MY EARLY FRIENDS.
ONE of the remotest visions of my infancy—dim as the pearly dawn
itself—is of two dogs called Flora and Danger, priest-grey and
brown-and-yellow terriers respectively, which filled a prominent
place in my baby regard. They soon vanished from the scene, and some
time elapsed before they were succeeded by Fido—a small, sleek,
short-haired, brown dog, resembling an English terrier, which was
partly my own property, and, much more than any doll or toy, the
darling of my early childhood.
I fancy Fido was not very well descended, and that his small size
was due to accident, or to some arresting process practised in his
puppyhood. But he was a well-made little dog; he had a keen tiny face,
with erect ears; and he was amazingly agile in his habits. In fact
his agility, together with his audacity, brought about his untimely
death—the manner of which remains, at this distance of time, more
impressed on my mind than any incident in his short life.
I remember the scene and circumstances as if the event had happened
yesterday. My mother had strolled beyond the garden to “the front of
the brae,” as it was called, or the brow of the green, grassy hill on
which the old white house was built. It commanded a wide stretch of
links or downs, met by the blue girdle of the Frith, having for its
fringe, all along the coast, clusters of ancient villages—fishing or
trading—with red-tiled or blue-slated houses, and round-belfried or
sharp-pointed steeples of parish kirks.
I think no place was ever fresher or sunnier than that “front of the
brae” on a summer morning, though in winter it was a bleak and windy
station enough. Some young colts, feeding, as they usually did, on the
links, had ventured to the summit of the brae, and were approaching the
stackyard. Fido was scampering among the yellow ragwort and purple bur
thistles in my mother’s vicinity, and on the impulse of the moment she
sent him after the young horses.
The rash suggestion was only too acceptable. Without a shade of
hesitation or fear, the morsel of a dog made a dart at the heels of
what were the hugest elephants to him, and though the colts had turned
to retreat, he reached them in time to be spurned by one of the flying
hoofs, and to fall down with his back or neck broken.
I have a vivid recollection of the consternation and grief of the
little group that gathered in the great kitchen, into which the
lifeless little dog was carried—of one of Fido’s young mistresses
wildly entreating to have wine put within the half-open jaws of
the dead dog—of the grave shake of the head with which some senior
negatived the desperate proposal, and of my mother’s kindly distress
at having caused the catastrophe, which had extinguished the spark of
life in one of God’s happy creatures, and occasioned such affliction to
the children.
I remember what a blight came over the bright day; how I rose from my
dinner in a passion of sorrow, because in a moment of forgetfulness
I had begun to lay aside some scrap for the dog which had ceased to
need scraps; and how I walked in the garden among the Maundy roses and
tall white Canterbury bells, and gathered—to store for a melancholy
memorial—some early seeds of the nasturtium with which the little
animal had been fond of playing, and in which there remained the marks
of his tiny teeth. I have had greater losses since then, but I have not
forgotten that first shock and stab of irretrievable separation.
To console us children for being deprived of our pet—and, I daresay,
as some small atonement in her own person—my mother furnished us with
money to buy another dog; an act in which there was a departure from
the family practice of not spending what little money was to spare
unnecessarily, and, above all, of not accustoming the children to
anything that could be regarded as extravagance or self-indulgence. In
our whole connection with dogs, this was the only instance in which one
became ours by purchase.
I cannot recall that it grated on my feelings that the empty place
of my dead pet should be filled up. I daresay I made some protest at
first—that I would not be consoled, and that I could never like (we say
_like_ in Scotland, where an English child would say _love_) another
doggie as I had liked Fido. But I was not then sufficiently faithful—or
shall I say proud and passionate enough?—to be long able to resist the
prospect of the dreary blank in the house and in my affections having
another occupant, with the wholesome hope that I might take to it and
be comforted, though I did not forget Fido.
I know I went in great glee, in the company of a sister a little older
than myself, to the village where we had heard of a suitable dog for
sale—indeed, I think we had gone and inspected it previously—and
where we were to pay down our purchase-money—it was no more than five
shillings—and receive our prize, which had belonged previously to a
tradesman.
The dog was a small black and white animal, with straight sleek hair,
and a pretty round face, set between pendant ears. I was a timid child,
and did not venture to lay hands on our purchase while it was yet
strange to us, and my sister undertook to carry it home in her arms.
On our way we encountered a gentleman who was an acquaintance of the
family, and who, not understanding how we were situated, insisted on
shaking hands with us children. My sister was compelled partly to let
go her captive—it did not escape, it only scrambled to her shoulder,
from which she was unable to dislodge it, and where, to our affront, it
stood barking wrathfully at the new-comer.
The dog had been named “Jessie Mackie,” a very human title, of which we
did not approve for a dog, and so we called her “Rona,” the name of a
dog of a friend’s friend. The title struck our fancy, and we believed
that it had belonged originally to an island on the west coast of
Scotland—rather a dignified source for a name. But I cannot say that I
ever met any person who had visited the island of Rona, or who could
tell exactly whereabouts in the Atlantic—from wild St. Kilda to wooded
Rothesay—it was to be found.
Rona answered our expectations, and soon took Fido’s position in
the house. She was a thoroughly worthy little dog; I don’t know
that she was very clever, but I can vouch that she was exceedingly
companionable. In her prime she was perfectly good-humoured to her
friends, though I do not think that she was ever very accessible to
strangers. She had queer ways of her own. She was very fond of fish,
to which, as an article of food, dogs have either a great liking or
loathing. She slept on the lower shelf of a cupboard, reserved for
her use, in a dressing-room attached to the nursery. She would retire
there for a morning snooze, and members of the family, unaware of
her proximity, would be startled, on going into the nursery, by loud
snores, exactly resembling those of a human being guilty of snoring,
proceeding from the dressing-room at high noon. She had been taught to
beg, and had great faith in the efficacy of the supplication. She would
be found in a room alone begging with great patience to a closed door,
and confidently expecting it would yield to the appeal.
Rona was peculiarly affected by certain kinds of music, as dogs
sometimes are. I have read different opinions expressed of the
impression made by music on dogs, with an attempt to decide whether it
is pain or pleasure which is produced on the creature by the melody
that awakens its attention and rouses its emotions. The preponderance
of evidence tends to indicate that it is pain, or at least some form
of fear or distress, which music causes in the dog. What I remember of
Rona’s behaviour when so excited confirms this idea, though we children
chose to class the performance as singing, and boasted loudly of it to
our companions, who used to wait breathlessly for it to begin, and
were filled with delighted wonder, amounting to awe, when the dog was
got to exhibit its talent. The sound of a piano or of singing did not
move her in the least, but an accordion drawn out, or a violin played,
touched the chord which vibrated to music in Rona’s composition. She
would generally retire beneath a chair or sofa, with a restless,
disturbed air (I suppose we made out her withdrawal to be the assumed
modesty of a great performer); and if the music were continued, she
would raise her head and utter in prolonged bays and howls what, I am
satisfied, was her protest against the sound which, for some occult
reason, both excited and rendered her miserable. It was an evident
relief to her when the concert, in which she had felt bound to bear a
part, was brought to a conclusion.
I think it was for Rona that we children first manufactured a set
of garments which figured on more than one dog. There was a pair of
flannel pantaloons, into which we inserted the dog’s unwilling legs,
fastening the pantaloons by strings across her back. There was a
flannel gown, which we called a dressing-gown, and suspended round her
shoulders. The costume was finished by a round cap, like a Highland
bonnet, which we put on her head, tying it under her chin—or jaw: on
high occasions we stuck a feather unto this cap.
Of course Rona objected strongly, in her own mind, to these incongruous
decorations, though she had to submit outwardly to our will on that
point. The pantaloons, after they had been donned, were least in her
way, and she would appear to forget them and run about in them without
protest for hours.
I remember one day, during a period of rainy weather, when even the
sandy roads of that district were wet and miry, that an elder sister,
who had gone to make calls in the village, came back half-a-mile with
Rona. The dog had stolen out and kept at a safe distance in the rear,
till she considered that she was beyond the danger of being marched
home, when she capered to the front, and her unconscious companion not
only perceived who was her attendant, but discovered, to her mingled
diversion and chagrin, that the dog was dressed in that supremely
absurd pair of pantaloons, plentifully bespattered with mud.
By the time the younger members of the family were sent to school,
poor Rona was up in years, and had become peevish and snappish in her
growing infirmities, so that it was judged advisable that she should
be quietly put out of the way in her mistresses’ absence. When we came
home jubilant, we found no Rona waddling out to greet us, and I am
afraid we had so many to meet, and so much to occupy us, that we hardly
missed our humble friend.
A contemporary of Rona’s was a tall, gaunt, black—with silver hairs,
peculiarly ugly, and valuable sheep-dog, which was my father’s friend.
His ugliness was the result either of disease or of an accident, which
had removed a portion of the lip and exposed his teeth on one side,
but which did not impair his health, or detract from his merit as a
wise and an efficient collie. His name, which was not given by us, was
peculiar. I imagine it was either a mistake or a corruption. Instead of
being termed “Yarrow,” “Tweed,” or “Heather,” the traditional names for
Scotch collies, he was called “Gasto,” which I have a notion must have
been a perversion of “Gaston,” though how a Scotch collie came to bear
a chivalrous French Christian name I have not the faintest idea.
He was a dog that had his proper business to mind, and did not take
much account of us children. Shepherds who have the rearing of such
dogs do not encourage their association with children, and regard
it, where it occurs, as liable to be a source of deterioration in an
animal which is bred to endure hardship, and to live under a sense of
responsibility. And when the creature is trained to perfection, it is
as valuable and important a member of the establishment on a sheep-farm
as an ox or a horse on another farm. Gasto was one of the gravest dogs
I ever saw, far too sober for play of any kind. Looking back, I cannot
help associating him with wintry blasts and snow-drifts, in which he is
buffeting the blast and wading through the drift, intent on his calling.
Gasto knew but one master, my father, and for him he lived and
laboured with a still, deep devotion. On one occasion, when my father
was attacked by a dangerous illness, and confined to his room for a
time, the sheep-dog wandered about disconsolately, declining even to
attend to his ordinarily rigidly discharged office, at the bidding
of any other than his master. As the days wore on, about the time
that the disease approached its crisis, the dog stationed himself
on the garden wall, and in a manner foreign to his usually rather
impassive, preoccupied demeanour when he was not about his work, howled
dismally—conduct which, however well meant, was not calculated to cheer
the invalid, or the watchers in the sick-room. The dog then refused
to touch food, and it was feared he would die. After every other mode
of coaxing was tried, without effect, Gasto was taken into the room
where my father, by that time recovering, lay in bed—was shown his
master, and spoken to by him. I don’t think the dog attempted to leap
on the bed, or did more than wag his bushy tail with immense relief
and repressed gladness; but when a plate with his food was offered
to him in the loved presence, he ate it quietly without further
demur. Forthwith he went about his business, content to discharge it
faithfully, as a trust committed to him, and to wait hopefully for the
reappearance of his master.
Poor Gasto, to my father’s great regret and indignation, was cruelly
poisoned by some ill-disposed persons in the neighbourhood. Another dog
of ours fell a victim to their misdeeds. He was a huge, fawn-coloured,
young watch-dog, named “Neptune,” that was thus summarily cut
off before he had got the beyond boisterous uncouthness of this
hobble-de-hoyism.
I have come to the advent of a prized dog, so long a much esteemed
member of the household, that she was regarded, not only by ourselves
but our friends, as one of the family. She was a pure bred and
fine terrier, given when she was about a year old to my brother,
as the parting gift of a friend about to sail for Ceylon. She was
dear for his sake as well as for her own, but she soon needed no
external recommendation to make her a chief favourite. I have only a
hazy recollection of her introduction to us, but a fragment of her
illustrious pedigree, which was imparted with befitting seriousness,
lingers in my mind. “Her mother was a lineal descendant of the dog that
fought the lion at Warwick.” What sort of lion-baiting this was? how
it happened to take place at Warwick? what was the date of the event?
whether the whole story were not a tradition of the great Bevis?
were questions never answered. But we were accustomed to repeat the
assertion as a solemn attestation to Skatta’s claims to superiority.
Skatta, like Rona, was named for an island in the West—an island which
has a substantial existence. Yet though we were told, and implicitly
believed for many a day, that the dog was of Western origin, a Skye
terrier, this was ultimately disputed. I have been assured that she
was a fine Dandie Dinmont terrier, of the renowned mustard species,
and that she and her forbears ought to have been traced to pastoral
Liddesdale in the South, and not to the corries of Cuchullin in
the Land of Mist. I am sorry that I am not possessed of sufficient
erudition to settle the point.
In the eyes of connoisseurs Skatta was a beautiful dog, though I am
doubtful whether the uninitiated world would have perceived the extent
of her claims. Her colour hovered between a sulphur yellow and a buff.
She was short in the legs and rather long in the body, but not with
such an ungainly length as I am told a true Skye terrier should show,
just as a genuine Belgian canary-bird ought to be slightly hump-backed.
The hair on her back was rough and wiry—one of her good points in our
estimation; it was softer on her breast, legs, and feathery tail,
and on her head, especially in the case of an admired lock that lay
on her forehead, the texture of which was almost as fine as that of
floss-silk. Her acute ears were of course erect. Her subtlest of noses
was, in accordance with her complexion, red, not black. Her honest
affectionate eyes were of warm hazel.
Skatta was by instinct alone an excellent game dog, and her glory
was to be in attendance on the taking down of a stack in the yard,
to sit watching with all her wits about her, and to pounce on and
despatch each rat as it appeared. There were rabbit warrens in the
neighbourhood, not without danger to the terrier. In her hot pursuit
of the rabbits, she would follow them into their burrows by passages
and windings too narrow for her to turn herself in, while the sandy
soil fell down behind her, and she was detained till her absence was
remarked. The dog’s half-suffocated yelps indicated her subterranean
place of imprisonment, when aid was speedily lent to restore her to the
upper world.
On other occasions Skatta’s feet were caught in the traps set by the
rabbit-catchers, and though her bones were strong enough to resist
the pressure, and she was not maimed, as so many of our cats became,
but generally freed herself after a struggle, and returned home
triumphantly without much injury, in two instances she was a serious
sufferer from the accident. In the first it was not known that she had
been caught in a trap, and nobody guessed why she paid such sedulous
attention to one of her front paws, till after an interval of weeks,
in the face of an impending lameness, a close examination detected
a portion of brass-wire bound tightly round, and eating into the
festering flesh. At a much later date, when Skatta was an old dog, her
master missed her from his heel after crossing one of these warrens.
It was a dark night, and he could not stay to search for her, even if
it had been possible to find her. He trusted that, if she had been
caught in a trap, she would free herself, as she had been wont to do,
and follow on his steps. As she remained absent, however, the entire
night—an unexampled incident in her history—my brother started early
next morning in search of her, and found her lying unable to stir, with
one of her legs terribly lacerated. She was carried carefully home, and
after being tended for weeks, during which she showed great patience
and gratitude, she was restored to the full use of her limbs.
In spite of the danger, the rabbit-haunted links, with their wild
thyme, cowslips, and harebells in the seasons, presented the utmost
fascination in life to Skatta. After the links, she cared for the
weasel and rat-frequented fields and ditches of the strath, with their
bugloses and poppies, brooklime and irises; but the links formed _par
excellence_ her happy hunting-ground. I have heard her master say that
on returning home, or taking a stroll before retiring to rest on a
summer night, her mute entreaty was sometimes so irresistible, that he
would turn away from the house and take the path to the solemn sea and
the silent links, to grant her the half-hour’s indulgence she besought.
At one period she walked with the women of the family every afternoon,
and amused them by her uncontrollable disappointment and chagrin—though
she was for the most part a modest, reasonable dog—when they resorted
to the rocks and the sands as their place of promenade. She would sit
down beside them while they rested, and begin to shiver, though she was
in perfect health, and to whimper under her breath a reproach for their
perversity. Why were they so provoking? Why could they not have walked
on the springy turf of the links, or by the pleasant field path? Then
she might have hunted to her heart’s content, and still have been in
their company.
When my brother was at home, Skatta made a marked distinction between
him and the rest of the family, acknowledging him pointedly as her
master, and electing herself his constant companion. When he first left
home, she was very disconsolate for a few days, and sat a good deal on
the garden wall, howling as Gasto did when my father was ill. After a
time she seemed to make up her mind to the separation, and transferred
her primary allegiance in a measure, and for the moment, to my father.
(Though she was of the female sex herself, she gave no support to the
rights of women, farther than being social and happy with us girls.)
Her real master’s absence was sometimes for many months, and lasted
over a period of years; but the moment he reappeared on the scene
she returned unfailingly to her first love. So perfect was the good
understanding between man and dog, and so blameless was the conduct of
the latter as a rule, that I have heard my brother say he only struck
his dog twice in the whole course of their long connection. On the
first occasion the blow was administered to correct a fault, but on
the second his stick fell on the wrong dog in a combat which had been
thrust on Skatta, and which he was trying to stop. He averred that he
could not bear to look his dog in the face afterwards, because of the
meek wonder with which she submitted to the unjust stroke, and, as he
complained, he had not the comfort of explaining to her that it was all
a mistake.
Skatta was never more than friendly to people outside her family,
and there was one family friend whom she, like most reflective dogs,
held in abhorrence. She hated the doctor, and laid aside her peaceful
character to growl out her enmity every time she was in his company.
I have heard various reasons assigned for the dislike of dogs to
doctors.[C] Do their delicate noses detect and find fault with any
subtle aroma hanging about the man who orders drugs? Are the dogs’
affectionate hearts moved by sympathy with the signs of suffering and
anxiety, which they are quick to read, in the faces of the family?
The dumb animals are clever enough to connect these tokens with
the presence of the doctor, while they are not sufficiently well
informed—given to leap at conclusions as they are—to comprehend that he
is there to relieve distress instead of being its author.
If dogs detest doctors, they do not often extend their dislike to
clergymen. Skatta was not only on perfectly civil terms with the
“minister” of her master’s kirk, she herself knew the Sunday, and was
disposed to respect its observance like a true-blue Presbyterian.
She did not, to be sure, go to the kirk like the dog of one of the
ministers in the village,[D] but she consented to stay at home without
any protest, and only burst out and greeted her family rather
uproariously on their return in the ranks of their fellow-worshippers.
On other occasions, to stay at home when her friends were going
abroad, or to submit to confinement, was so severe a trial of Skatta’s
philosophy, that it was the one decree which found and left her
rebellious. It was no easy task to detain a dog that, when shut into a
room on the second floor of the house, with the windows closed, broke
through a pane of glass, and precipitated herself twelve or fifteen
feet to the ground; and with such rapidity did she clear the glass in
taking the leap, that she was not punished for her defiant temerity by
more than a few inconsiderable scratches and bruises.
She once walked a distance of fifteen miles with her master, and at
the end of the journey was tied up in a stable, since he was going
where she could not conveniently accompany him. I need not say that she
gnawed through the string, seized an opportunity, when the stable-door
was open, to make her escape, and, not being able to trace her master,
ran the whole way home again, and arrived in the course of two more
hours, very travel-stained, tired, and hungry, but content. This is
nothing of a feat compared to that performed by an Argyleshire terrier,
which, having been conveyed in a carriage through one of the passes
into an entirely different district, set off at the first available
moment, and crossed a great solitary mountain range—taking a week to do
it—arriving at last, a gaunt but happy skeleton, at what it persisted
in regarding as its own door. How the poor animal subsisted in the
meantime was only known to Him who feedeth the young ravens when they
cry.
I remember Skatta’s being lent to a sportsman, who was very desirous
of availing himself of her powers; but no bribe of game or sport would
detain her from her friends. So soon as she was let loose, she broke
away and rushed back to them, the quick pattering of her feet sounding
in every room of the house, her gleaming eyes and vibrating tail
appealing to each member of the family in turn with a “Here I am, you
see; I could not and I would not stay away.”
The pertinacity with which Skatta followed her master sometimes
produced awkward results. He was attending the funeral of an old
retainer of the family, to whom he desired to pay particular respect.
He believed that the dog was safe at a distance when he was motioned
to a place of honour close to the open grave. He observed a little
disturbance among the ring of mourners, and, to his horror, discovered
Skatta in the centre, by his side, with her head poked inquisitively
forward over what was to her a great black hole.
Skatta came to us when some of us were young enough to dress her in
Rona’s cast-off clothes; she lived sufficiently long with us to see
the steps of the youngest grow slow, and care settling on their brows.
She was a silent witness to many changes—to the passing away of one
honoured face, the breaking up of the old home, the dispersion of the
family. She herself was so old that both her sight and hearing were
nearly gone, and she could hardly answer to the signal of the master
she had loved so well. Her life was becoming a burden to her—she was
getting diseased as well as infirm. It was feared she would prove
dangerous to a child in the house where she lived, as she had always
been jealous of children where her master was concerned, disliking to
see him take them into his arms, sniffing and growling at them if
they came too near him according to her ideas, and fiercely resenting
any liberty taken with herself under the circumstances. So old Skatta
was sentenced—with what regret may be imagined—to a death quick and
painless, for the sake of higher humanity.
A contemporary of Skatta’s was a huge black and white watch-dog, named
“Foam,” a good-natured, but formidable creature, which, when it was
let loose, used to come bounding to greet us, and such was its impetus
that, when it planted a paw on each shoulder, it caused each one of us
to reel and stagger under its caress.
An interregnum in our connection with dogs occurred, during which,
as I have heard masters and mistresses say after the loss of a
confidential and trusty servant, various unavailable retainers passed
across the domestic stage without making a lengthened stay, or filling
successfully the vacant post.
There was “James Craig,” a white, straight-haired terrier, boasting the
becoming contrast of lively black eyes and a black nose. His temper
was irascible, and his life was rendered so unendurable to him by the
mischievous attentions of several lads, whose office chanced to be in
the vicinity of his home, and who insisted on stamping their feet at
him, that he in turn made life unbearable to his human neighbours, and
had to be banished from the establishment. His fate was hard. He was
always an excitable dog, and he managed, while quite in his senses, to
inspire some credulous panic-stricken people with the notion that he
was mad, under which delusion he was stoned to death.
There was “Bobby,” a pretty, but weak-minded black spaniel, which also
suffered a violent death. He had not the sense to get out of the way of
a coach which drove over him.
There was a poor dog—the very name of which I have forgotten—that was
summarily shot by a sanguinary gamekeeper for deserting his master’s
side, for one brief moment, to encroach on a jealously guarded preserve.
There was “Massey Redan,” a promising little pepper-and-salt terrier,
that was picked up at the door of the house in the town where we then
lived, and driven off in a “cadger’s” cart by a company of successful
amateur dog-stealers.
There was “Juno,” a brown retriever, so crazy about taking to the water
that she would desert her master to spend the whole day by the sea,
plunging in for whatever stick or stone the children, who delighted in
her swimming powers, might throw her.
There was “William Alexander,” another retriever, a handsome, powerful,
jet-black dog, which had a predilection for nuts, and would pounce on a
sack in a grocer’s shop, abstract, crack, and eat the contents for her
delectation. She used to sit up on her haunches by her master’s side
while he sat writing or reading, and when William Alexander thought
they had both had enough of the work, he would slap his master smartly
on the arm with his paw in order to call his attention to the fact.
His master had trained the dog to bring him his boots every morning;
but so headlong was William Alexander’s race with them, up and down
stairs, that he would have thrown to the ground any unhappy individual
who had happened to impede his progress. Indeed there was always
something of a whirlwind about the dog, and when to his restlessness
and boisterousness were added the reflection of the same qualities in a
child visitor, the house seemed too small to hold the two.
William Alexander had a remarkable objection to seeing any of his
friends ill in bed, and on such occasions would begin to growl as at a
personal offence.
The dog had a trick, in accordance with his species, of bringing
everything to his master. Once, when a pet canary-bird got out of its
cage, and began flying wildly about the room, William Alexander caught
it, closing his great jaws upon it with a snap, so that it was lost to
sight, and the spectators never doubted killed on the instant. But when
he delivered up the bird to his master, it was uninjured save by fright.
Poor William Alexander tried this trick once too often. He was caught
attempting to lift a baby, which happened to be in the same house with
him, by the breast of its white frock, to take it to his master. He was
conducting the operation with the greatest gentleness and care, but
naturally the baby’s mother had an insuperable prejudice against the
performance, and William Alexander too had to be sent away.
[Illustration]
Marcus Ward & Co., Royal Ulster Works, Belfast.
FOOTNOTES:
[C] I need not say this has no reference to dogs which have doctors for
their masters, or that belong to any member of the family of a medical
man.
[D] This dog, a collie, had been reared in a pastoral parish, where
such dogs often accompany the shepherds to the kirk, and lie at their
masters’ feet during the service. The collie in question had been the
favourite of a bachelor clergyman, and was in the habit of walking
sedately at his heels into his church, ascending the pulpit stairs and
disposing itself quietly outside the pulpit door, to wait there till
the “diet of worship” had terminated. The congregation were so used to
the proceeding that it offended nobody’s sense of propriety. In course
of time the clergyman took to himself a wife, who rather objected to
his intrusive four-footed companion. In consequence of her sentiments
the dog was thrown a good deal on its own devices, and thought fit to
get up a friendship with a clergyman of a rival denomination in the
place. This worthy gentleman threw his people into a ferment by walking
up the aisle of his church one morning, followed unconsciously by his
professional opponent’s dog, which thus publicly showed that it had
seceded from one religious body and joined another.
List of New Books
JUST PUBLISHED BY
MARCUS WARD & CO.
_Floral Poetry and the Language of Flowers._ A collection of choice
poems on Flowers with most complete Indexes to the Language of Flowers
and eight exquisite Chromographs. Small quarto, cloth elegant, gilt
edge, 10/6.
_English Echoes of German Song._ Translated by Dr. R. E. WALLIS, Dr.
J. D. MORELL, and F. D’ANVERS. Edited by N. D’ANVERS. With Twelve
beautiful engravings on Steel. Small quarto, cloth elegant, gilt edges,
10/6.
_Childhood a Hundred Years Ago._ By SARAH TYTLER, Author of “Papers for
Thoughtful Girls,” &c., &c. With Six Chromos, after Paintings by Sir
JOSHUA REYNOLDS. Small quarto, cloth elegant, gilt edges, 10/6.
_Landseer’s Dogs and their Stories._ By SARAH TYTLER, Author of
“Childhood a Hundred Years Ago,” &c., &c. With Six Chromos, after
Paintings by Sir EDWIN LANDSEER. Small quarto, cloth elegant, gilt
edges, 10/6.
_Stories of Roman History for the Little Ones._ By CHARLOTTE M.
YONGE, Author of “Stories of Greek History for the Little Ones,” &c.
Illuminated Frontispiece and Title-page, and numerous Woodcuts. Square
octavo, cloth extra, bevelled boards, gilt edges, 6/-.
_Last Cruise of the Ariadne._ By S. WHITCHURCH SADLER, Author of
“The Ship of Ice,” “Perilous Seas,” &c. Coloured Frontispiece and
Illustrations. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 5/-.
_Three Years at Wolverton: a Public School Story._ By a Wolvertonian.
Coloured Frontispiece and Illustrations. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 5/-.
_India, Historical and Descriptive._ With an Account of the Sepoy
Mutiny of 1857-58, by C. H. EDEN. 66 Illustrations, Map, and Coloured
Frontispiece. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 3/6.
_Notes of Travel in Egypt and Nubia._ By J. L. STEPHENS. Revised and
enlarged, with an Account of the Suez Canal. 71 Illustrations, Map, and
Coloured Frontispiece. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 3/6.
_Fairy Land: Tales and Legends of Dwarfs, Fairies, Water-Sprites,
Elves, &c._ From the German of Villamaria. 25 Illustrations and
Coloured Frontispiece. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 3/6.
_Robinson Crusoe._ By DANIEL DE FOE. A new and beautiful edition, with
numerous Illustrations, Coloured Frontispiece and Title. Crown octavo,
cloth extra, 3/6.
_The Vicar of Wakefield._ By OLIVER GOLDSMITH. Numerous Illustrations,
Coloured Frontispiece and Title. Crown octavo, cloth extra, 3/6.
_Mildred’s Mistake._ A Still-Life Study. By F. LEVIEN, Author of
“Little Ada’s Jewels,” &c. Coloured Frontispiece and Illustrations.
Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_Kaspar and the Seven Wonderful Pigeons of Wurzburg._ By JULIA GODDARD.
Coloured Frontispiece and Illustrations. Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_Nanny’s Treasure._ Nineteen full-page Illustrations and Coloured
Frontispiece. Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_The Little Head of the Family._ Fourteen full-page Illustrations and
Coloured Frontispiece. Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_Where the Rail Runs Now: a Story of the Coaching Days._ By F.
FRANKFORT MOORE. With Illustrations. Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_Dobbie and Dobbie’s Master: a Peep into the Life of a very little
Man._ By N. D’ANVERS, Author of “Little Minnie’s Troubles,” &c. With
Illustrations. Small octavo, cloth extra, 2/6.
_Animals of the Farm: their Structure and Physiology._ A Handbook for
Agricultural Students and Farmers. By JOHN F. HODGES, M.D., F.C.S., &c.
Second Edition, revised by the Author. Numerous Illustrations. Small
octavo, cloth, 2/6.
_Aunt Charlotte’s Stories of Bible History for the Little Ones._ By
C. M. YONGE. School Edition. Numerous Illustrations. Neatly bound in
cloth, 2/-.
_Wildflower Win: the Journal of a Little Girl._ By KATHLEEN KNOX.
Numerous Illustrations. Cloth extra, 1/6.
_My Dolly._ By H. RUTHERFURD RUSSELL, Author of “Tom,” “Tom Seven Years
Old,” &c. Coloured Frontispiece and Numerous Illustrations. Cloth
extra, 1/6.
_Language and Poetry of Flowers._ Pocket Edition, Illustrations in Gold
and Colours. Cloth extra, 1/-.
IN THE PRESS.
_Japan, Historical and Descriptive._ Map and numerous Illustrations.
Uniform with “India, Historical and Descriptive.” Crown octavo, cloth
extra, 3/6.
_The Mythology of Greece and Rome, with special reference to its use
in Art._ From the German of O. Seemann. Edited by G. H. BIANCHI, B.A.,
late Scholar of S. Peter’s College, Cambridge; Brotherton Sanskrit
Prizeman, 1875. 64 Illustrations.
_Bards and Blossoms._ With Twelve Floral Plates, illuminated in Gold
and Colours. By F. E. HULME, F.L.S., F.S.A., Marlborough College;
Author of “Plants: their Natural Growth and Ornamental Treatment,” &c.
A complete Catalogue of Marcus Ward & Co.’s Publications may be had,
free by post, on application.
* * * * *
Transcriber’s Notes:
Obvious punctuation errors repaired.
Page 54, “Methusaleh” changed to “Methuselah” (age of Methuselah)
Page 96, “Fotheringay” changed to “Fotheringhay” (the block at
Fotheringhay)
Page 125, “rot” changed to “trot” (and trot after Dick)
Advertisement:
Page 1, Landseer’s name was changed from plain case to “by Sir EDWIN
LANDSEER” to match the rest of the listings’ style.
End of Project Gutenberg's Landseer's Dogs and Their Stories, by Sarah Tytler