WHY ARE ALL MEN GAMBLERS?

The annual report of the gambling house at Monte Carlo shows a

profit of about $5,000,000.

A large collection of human beings travel from all parts of the

world to Monte Carlo for the sake of giving $5,000,000 to the

gambling concern there.

Wherever you look on earth to-day or in the past you find human

beings gambling, and you will find the gambling instinct stronger

than any other--stronger than the love of drink, infinitely

stronger than the love of normal, honest gain.

* * *

Christopher Columbus's sailors gambled on the way over, and the

Indians on this side were gambling while waiting to be

discovered.

In an office overlooking Trinity graveyard, in New York City, an

old man, past eighty, with a fortune of at least $50,000,000,

gambles every day with all the excitement of youth. The

fluctuations in his game bring to his sallow cheeks the color

that no other human emotion could bring there.

On his way home this old man passes crowds of children in the

streets and looks down, concerned and sorrowful, to find that

they, too, are gambling.

They are matching pennies or shaking dice.

* * *

Clergymen are startled and amazed to find that women are gambling

heavily.

They have gambled heavily ever since civilization has progressed

far enough to give them large sums to gamble with.

Marie Antoinette staked thousands of louis at a time at

Versailles.

She was so wrapped up in gambling she could not see that her neck

was in danger.

When the lava came down from Vesuvius it buried Pompeiians who

were gambling.

The men who dig up the old monuments in Africa find gambling

instruments crumbling away side by side with appliances for

taking human life.

* * *

Nowhere in the lower forms of animal life, so far as we know, is

there the slightest indication of the gambling instinct.

The monkey, the elephant, love whiskey, and easily become

drunkards.

The passion for alcohol seems innate in animal life; even the

wise ant can be readily induced to disgrace himself if alcohol is

put near him.

For all the human weaknesses and mainsprings--ambition,

affection, vanity, drunkenness, ferocity, greediness, cunning--we

can find beginnings among the lower animals.

But man appears to have evolved from within himself the gambling

instinct for his own especial damnation.

Where did the instinct come from? Why was it planted in us?

Like every other instinct with which intelligent nature endows

us, it must have its good purpose, and it must not be judged

merely in the corrupted form in which we study it at Monte Carlo

or in Wall Street.

Perhaps the spirit of gambling is really only an atrophied,

perverted form of the spirit of adventure.

Columbus staked his life and gambled, when he started across the

water.

The leaders of the American Revolution expressly staked their

lives, their fortunes and their "sacred honor" in signing the

Declaration of Independence. They were noble gamblers, working

for the welfare of their fellows.

Perhaps gambling is only a perverted form of intelligent

ambition--we are all natural gamblers because we have within us

the quality which makes us willing to risk our own comfort,

security and present happiness for a result that seems better

worth while.

The universality of the gambling instinct in human beings is

certainly worthy of our study.

NO MAN UNDERSTANDS IRON

HOW CAN WE HOPE TO UNDERSTAND GOD?

Is there laughter in heaven--or can nothing move the eternal

heavenly calm?

If mirth exists among the perpetually blissful, how must the

angels laugh when in idle moments they listen to our speculations

concerning the Divinity? They peer down at us as we look at ants

dragging home a fragment of dead caterpillar. They hear us say

things like this:

If God exists, why does He not reveal himself to ME?

How could God exist before He created the world? Force cannot

exist or demonstrate its existence without matter. How could a

creator exist except with creation around him?

Where did He live before He made heaven?

If He is all-powerful, could He in five seconds make a six

months' old calf? If He made it in five seconds it would not be

six months old.

Nonsense more subtle comes from the educated, from those who know

enough to be preposterous in a pretentious way.

Hear the wise man:

God does not exist, because I cannot prove His existence: I can

prove everything else. With my law of gravitation I point to a

speck in space and say: "You'll find a new planet there," and

you find it. If a God existed could I not also point to Him? If

I can trace a comet in its flight, could I not trace the comet's

maker?

Huxley says: "The cosmic process has no sort of relation to

moral ends." That's a philosopher's way of saying something

foolish. Lalande, the astronomer, remarked that he had swept the

entire heavens with his telescope and found no God there. That's

funnier than any ant who should say: "I've searched this whole

dead caterpillar and found no God, so THERE IS NO GOD." The

corner of space which our telescopes can "sweep" is smaller,

compared to the universe, than a dead caterpillar compared with

this earth.

Moleschott, an able physiologist, believed that phosphorus was

essential to mental activity. Perhaps he did prove that. But he

said: "No thought without phosphorus," and thought he had wiped

the human soul out of existence. Philosophers do not laugh at

Moleschott. But they would laugh at a savage who would say:

"I have discovered that there is a catgut in a fiddle. No fiddle

without catgut--no music without cats. Don't talk to me about

soul or musical genius--it's all catgut."

We peek out at this universe from our half-developed corner of

it. We see faintly the millions of huge suns circling with their

planet families billions of miles away. We see our own little

sun rise and set; we ask ourselves a thousand foolish questions

of cause and Ruler--and because we cannot answer, we decry faith.

Wise doubter, look at a small piece of iron. It looks solid.

You suppose that its various parts touch. But submit it to cold.

You make it smaller. Then the particles did not touch. Do they

touch now? No; relatively they are farther apart than this

planet from its nearest neighbor.

That piece of iron, apparently solid, consists of clusters of

atoms wonderfully grouped, each cluster called a molecule. The

molecular cluster is invisible, millions of clusters in the

smallest visible fragment. The atom is accepted by science as

the final particle of matter. Its name indicates that it is

supposed to be indivisible. When science gets to the atom it

calmly gives up and says: "That is so small that it can no

longer be divided." A reasonable enough conclusion on the

surface, considering that you might have millions of atoms of

iron in one corner of your eye and not know it.

But why should the atom be incapable of further division? If it

is any size at all it can be thought of as split.

Where does the divisibility of matter end, if anywhere? What is

there SOLID about iron? Nothing in reality, except that it seems

to us solid. Already, with the X-ray, we can look through it.

Forces such as heat and electricity pass through it more readily

than through free air.

Science, which gradually finds things out, denying as it goes

along everything one step beyond, tells you truly that the

clusters of atoms in iron float in a sea of ether, just as do our

planets going round the sun. Heat the iron intensely. What

happens? You get what you call white heat. The white heat and

the white light come from the increase of wave motion in this

ether, and this ether, absolutely imponderable, of a tenuity

inconceivable, possesses elasticity greater and more powerful

than that of coiled steel. ----

So much for one small piece of iron, such as you would kick to

one side in a junk heap. If it interests you, read pages 159 to

162 of John Fiske's admirable little book, "Through Nature to

God." You will finish the book the day you get it.

If you are surprised to learn how much you did not know about

iron--after living near bits of iron all your life--is it not

just possible that your mind may be too feeble to conceive of

God?

For the fly buzzing about the edge of Niagara Falls, the falls do

not exist. The fly's brain cannot grasp their grandeur. It can

understand only the speck of spray that falls on its wing.

You live with God around you, hopelessly incapable of perceiving

His existence save through that faint spark of unconscious faith

that was mercifully planted in you. Snuff that out with dull

efforts at reason, and you have nothing.

Editorials from the Hearst Newspapers · 第 2 / 133 题