RT.

Warmington.

_Monumental Portraits_ (Vol. v., p. 349.).--Fully agreeing with my

friend H. H. in his opinion of the brass of the Abbess of Elstow,

considered as a portrait, I should yet be glad if your correspondents

would send to "N. & Q." the names of any effigies which may appear to

them exceptions to the rule of conventional portraiture, especially if

of earlier date than the latter half of the sixteenth century. H. H. has

mentioned one, Nicholas Canteys, 1431, at Margate: and I am inclined to

add another in the well-executed little brass of Robert de Brentingham

at East Horsley, Surrey; this is about the date of 1380. The artists of

that time, in brasses as well as in painted glass, wood-carving, &c.,

may have sometimes desired to produce a portrait, but certainly they

seldom succeeded: a religious severity of expression atoned for the

deficiency. In English coins it is well known that there is no

appearance of a portrait before the reign of Henry VII.

The particular _costume_, however, of the deceased was more attended to

in monumental effigies; and it is this fact which renders the study of

them so serviceable towards a knowledge of the manners and habits of our

ancestors. Care was even taken not to omit any peculiarity which may

have distinguished the deceased; of which the long beard of Sir Wm.

Tendring, at Stoke, by Layland, is perhaps an instance, and many others

might be quoted. If any decided portraits are known in _stone effigies_,

it would I think be desirable to communicate such to the pages of "N. &

Q."

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 132, May 8, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 123 / 164 题