GOSPEL OAKS.

(Vol. v., pp. 157. 209.)

The replies of FABER, EXON., and P. T. to the inquiry of STEPHEN,

concerning the origin of Gospel Oaks, are not very explanatory.

The oak was consecrated to the god of thunder--Ang.-Sax., _Thunor_;

Gallic, _Taranis_; Irish, _Toran_; Anc. N. _Thorr_--as being more

generally struck by lightning than any other tree; and the acorn was

called by the Romans _Jovis glans_, the fruit of the supreme god.

"Quercus Jovi placuit."--_Phædrus_, III. 17.

"Magna Jovis antiquo robore quercus."--Virg. _Georg._ III. 332.

At Dodona stood the δρῦς ὑψίκομος Διός.--_Od._ XIV. 327.

Woods, groves, and trees were the temples and sacred emblems of the

Deity among the greater part of the Pagans, but especially among the

Teutonic and Celtic tribes. Maximus Tyrius, an author of the second

century, informs us, concerning the worship of the Celts:

"Κελτοὶ σέβουσι μὲν Δία, ἄγαλμα δὲ Διὸς Κελτικὸν ὑψηλὴ δρῦς."

And Tacitus gives us the oldest testimonies concerning the Germans,

_Germ._ 9.:

"Ceterum, nec cohibere parietibus Deos, neque in ullam humani oris

speciem assimulare, ex magnitudine coelestium arbitrantur. _Lucos

ac nemora consecrant_, Deorumque nominibus appellant secretum

illud, quod sola reverentia vident."

Vid. _Germ._ 39. cap. 40. cap. 43., &c.

Also, a passage of the later Claudian is to the same purpose:

Ut procul Hercyniæ per vasta silentia silvæ

Venari tuto liceat, lucosque vetusta

Religione truces, et _robora Numinis instar

Barbarici_, nostræ feriant impune bipennes.

_Cons. Stilich._ I. 288.

From these passages it will be seen that the gods dwelt in these groves,

and that sacred vessels and altars were placed there, but no images;

neither were temples erected.[2] The practice of worshipping the gods in

woods and trees continued for many centuries, till the introduction of

Christianity (Vid. Willibald, A.D. 786, _in Vita Bonifacii_), and the

converters did not disdain to adopt every means to raise Christian

cultus to higher authority than that of Paganism, by acting upon the

senses of the heathen, _e.g._ using white robes for those baptized,

lighting of candles, burning of incense, &c.; and they erected the

Christian churches, for the most part, upon the site of Pagan _tree_ or

temple; Sulp. _Severus_ (ed. Amst. 1665), p. 485.:

"Nam ubi fana destruxerat (Martinus), _statim ibi aut ecclesias

aut monasteria construebat_."

Dietm. _V. Merseb._, 7. 52., p. 859.:

"Fana idolorum destruens incendit, et mare dæmonibus cultum

inmissis quatuor lapidibus, sacro Chrismate perunctis et aqua

purgans benedicta, novam Domino ... plantationem eduxit."

[Footnote 2: Brissonius _De Regno Pers._ II. 28.: "Persæ diis suis

nulla templa vel altaria constituunt, nulla simulacra."]

The heathen gods were represented as impotent, in opposition to the true

God, though not as powerless in themselves, and were converted into

inimical evil powers, which must submit, but could nevertheless exercise

a certain hurtful influence.

Some heathen traditions and superstitions remained, their names only

being altered into those of Christ, Maria, and the saints. In this

manner they spared the assuefactions of the people, and made them

believe that the sacredness of the place was not lost, but henceforth

depended on the presence of the true God.

The above facts will perhaps sufficiently explain the origin of the

Gospel Oak.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 132, May 8, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 81 / 164 题