After some little delay, the Legislature, with one adverse m

Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images available at The Internet Archive)

[Illustration: THE ATLANTIC TELEGRAPH

BY W H RUSSELL, LLD

ILLUSTRATED BY ROBERT DUDLEY

DEDICATED BY SPECIAL PERMISSION TO HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS

ALBERT EDWARD, PRINCE OF WALES

DAY & SON LIMITED 6 GATE STREET LONDON

R. Dudley]

THE ATLANTIC

TELEGRAPH

(1865)

THE ATLANTIC

TELEGRAPH

(1865)

by

W. H. RUSSELL

NAVAL INSTITUTE PRESS

International Standard Book Number 0-87021-806-9

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 75-184620

First published in 1865

Published and Distributed in the

United States of America by the

Naval Institute Press

Printed in Great Britain

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Weighing anchor off the Maplin Sands, Nore, July 15, 1865 ii

OPPOSITE PAGE

The reels of gutta-percha-covered conducting-wire conveyed

into tanks at the works at Greenwich 14

Valentia in 1857-1858 at the time of the laying of the former

cable 15

Trinity Bay, Newfoundland: Exterior view of Telegraph House

in 1857-1858 26

Telegraph House, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland: Interior of

messroom, 1858 27

H.M.S. Agamemnon laying the Atlantic telegraph cable in 1858:

A whale crosses the line 30

Coiling the cable in the large tanks at the works at Greenwich 31

The cable passed from the works into the hulk lying in the

Thames at Greenwich 38

The old frigate with her freight of cable alongside the Great

Eastern at Sheerness 39

Paying-out machinery 40

Coiling the cable in the after-tank on board the Great Eastern

at Sheerness: Visit of H.R.H. The Prince of Wales on May 24 41

Foilhummerum Bay, Valentia, looking seawards from the point

at which the cable reaches the shore 44

The cliffs, Foilhummerum Bay: Point of the landing of the

shore end of cable, July 22 45

Foilhummerum Bay, Valentia, from Cromwell Fort: The

Caroline and boats laying the earth-wire, July 21 48

The Great Eastern under weigh, July 23: Escort and other

ships introduced being the Terrible, the Sphinx, the Hawk,

and the Caroline 49

Chart, showing the track of the steamship Great Eastern on

her voyage from Valentia to Newfoundland 56

Splicing the cable (after the first accident) on board the Great

Eastern, July 25 57

View (looking aft) from the port paddle-box of Great Eastern:

Showing the trough for cable, etc. 62

The forge on deck; Night of August 9: Preparing the iron

plating for capstan 63

Searching for fault after recovery of the cable from the bed of

the Atlantic, July 31 72

In the bows, August 2: The cable broken and lost: Preparing

to grapple 73

Getting out one of the large buoys for launching, August 2 80

General view of Port Magee, &c., from the heights below Cora

Beg: The Caroline laying the shore end of the cable, July 22 81

Interior of one of the tanks on board the Great Eastern:

Cable passing out 86

Launching buoy on August 8, in lat. 51° 25´ 30´´; long. 30° 56´

(marking spot where cable had been grappled) 87

Forward deck cleared for the final attempt at grappling,

August 11 92

THE

ATLANTIC TELEGRAPH.

I shall not detain the readers of this brief narrative with any sketch

of the progress of electrical science. There are text-books,

cyclopædias, and treatises full of information concerning the men who

worked in early days, and recording the labours of those who still toil

on, investigating the laws and developing the applications of the subtle

agency which has long attracted the attention of the most acute,

ingenious, and successful students of natural philosophy. For the last

two centuries the greater number of those whose names are known in

science have made electrical experiments a favourite pursuit, or turned

to them as an agreeable recreation from severer studies. The rapidity

with which electricity travels for considerable distances through

insulated conductors soon suggested its use as a means of transmitting

intelligence; but the high tension of the currents from friction

machines, and the difficulty of insulating the conductors, were

practical obstacles to the employment of the devices, some of them

ingenious, recommended for that purpose from year to year. Otto Von

Guericke, and his globe of sulphur; Grey, with his glass tube and silken

cords; and Franklin, with his kite, were, however, the precursors of the

philosophers who have done much, and whose successors may yet do much

more, for the world. It is not easy to decide whether it is the man who

gives a new idea to the world, or he who embodies that idea in a form

and turns it into a fact, who is deserving of the credit to be assigned

to any invention. A vague expression of belief that a certain end may be

attained at a future period by means then unknown does not constitute a

discovery, and does not entitle the person who utters it, verbally or in

writing, to the honour which is due to him who indicates specifically

the way of achieving the object, or who actually accomplishes it by

methods he has either invented or applied. The Marquis of Worcester

certainly did not invent the steam-engine; neither did Watson, Salva,

Sœmmering, or Ronalds, or any other of the many early experimentalists,

discover electric telegraphy. But there is a degree of credit due to

those who, contending with imperfect materials and want of knowledge,

persist in working out their ideas, and succeed in rescuing them from

the region of chimæras. The inventions of one render capable of

realisation the ideas of another, which but for them had remained dreams

and visions. The introduction of a novel product into commerce, or the

chance discovery of some property in a common material, may draw a

project out of the limbo of impracticabilities. A suggestion at one

period may be more valuable than an invention at another, and

adaptations may be more useful than discoveries. Indeed, when the

testimony on which men’s reputations, as finders or makers, rest, is

critically examined, a suspicion is often generated that there have been

many Vespuccis in the world who have given names to places they never

found, and taken or received credit for what they never did.

If any person takes an interest in determining who was the inventor of

electric telegraphy, he should study the works and mark the improvements

of the natural philosophers of the last as well as of the present,

century, and he can then arrive at some result without exciting national

jealousy, or injuring individual susceptibilities. Humboldt assigns the

credit of making the first electric telegraph to Salva, who constructed

a line 26 miles long, from Madrid to Aranjuez, in 1798. Russia claims

the honour of having invented aerial telegraphic lines, because Baron

Von Schilling proposed a line for the Emperor from St. Petersburg to

Peterhoff, below Cronstadt, in 1834, and was laughed at by scientific

Muscovites for his pains. But the Baron certainly did transmit messages

along wires supported by poles in the air. The Count du Moncel, in his

recent “Traité de Télégraphie Electrique,” gives to Mr. Wheatstone the

palm as the original inventor of submarine Cables, to which award, no

doubt, there will be some dissent. Mr. Wheatstone, however, as early as

1840, brought before the House of Commons the project of a cable, to be

laid between Dover and Calais, though he does not seem to have had at

the time any decided views as to the mode in which insulation was to be

obtained. In 1843, Professor Morse, detailing the results of some

experiments with an electric magnetic telegraph between Washington and

Baltimore, in a letter to the Secretary of the United States, wrote:

“The practical inference from this law is that a telegraphic

communication on the electric-magnetic plan, may with certainty be

established across the Atlantic Ocean. Startling as this may seem now,

I am confident the time will come when this project will be realised.”

But for the experiments and discoveries of Oersted, Sturgeon, Ampére,

Davy, Henry, and Faraday, and a long list of others, such suggestions

would have remained as little likely to be realised as the Bishop of

Llandaff’s notions of a flying-machine, or the crude theories of the

alchemists. He who first produces a practical result--something which,

however imperfect, gives a result to be seen and felt, and appreciated

by the senses--is the true [Greek: poiêtês ποιἡτης]--the maker and

inventor, whom the world should recognise, no matter how much may be

done by others to improve his work, each of those improvers being, after

his kind, deserving of recognition for what he does. A year before

Professor Morse wrote the letter to Mr. Spencer, he took some steps to

show that which he prophesied was practicable. In the autumn of the year

1842 he stretched a submarine cable from Castle Garden to Governor’s

Island in the harbour of New York, demonstrated to the American

Institute the possibility of effecting electric communication through

the sea, and submitted that telegraphic communication might with

certainty be established across the Atlantic. Later in the same year he

sent a current across the canal at Washington. But that was not the

first current transmitted under water, for as early as 1839, Sir W.

O’Shaughnessy, the late Superintendent of Electric Telegraphs in India,

hauled an insulated wire across the Hooghly at Calcutta, and produced

electrical phenomena at the other side of the river. In 1846, Col. Colt,

the patentee of the revolver, and Mr. Robinson, of New York, laid a wire

across the river from New York to Brooklyn, and from Long Island to

Coney Island. In 1849, Mr. Walker sent messages to shore through two

miles of insulated wire from a battery on board a steamer off

Folkestone.

It was in 1851 that an electric cable was actually laid in the open sea,

and worked successfully; and the wire which then connected Dover with

Calais was beyond question the first important line of submarine

telegraph ever attempted. In the year 1850, Mr. Brett obtained a

concession from the French Government for effecting this object,--an

object regarded at the time as one purely chimerical, and decried by the

press as a gigantic swindle. The cable which was made for the purpose

consisted of a solid copper wire, covered with gutta percha. When tested

by Mr. Woollaston, it was found to be so imperfect from air holes in the

gutta-percha, that the water found its way to the copper wire,--an

imperfection which was however shortly repaired. This cable was

manufactured at the Gutta Percha works, on the Wharf Road, City Road,

under the superintendence of the late Mr. Samuel Statham; was then

coiled on a drum, and conveyed by steam-tug to Dover, and in the year

1850 was payed out from Dover to Calais. The landing-place in France was

Cape Grisnez, from which place a few messages passed, so as to comply

with the terms of the concession and test the accuracy of the principle.

The communication thus established between the Continent and England

was, after a few hours, abruptly stopped. A diligent fisherman, plying

his vocation, took up part of the cable in his trawl, and cut off a

piece, which he bore in triumph to Boulogne, where he exhibited it as a

specimen of a rare seaweed, with its centre filled with gold. It is

believed that this “pescatore ignobile” returned again and again to

search for further specimens of this treasure of the deep: it is, at all

events, perfectly certain that he succeeded in destroying the submarine

cable.

This accident caused the attention of scientific men to be directed to

the discovery of some mode of preserving submarine cables from similar

casualties, and a suggestion was made by Mr. Küper, who was engaged in

the manufacture of wire ropes, to Mr. Woollaston and to Mr. T. R.

Crampton, that the wire insulated with gutta-percha should form a core

or centre to a wire rope, so as to give protection to it during the

process of paying out and laying down, as well as to guard it from the

anchors of vessels and the rocks, and to secure a perfect electrical

continuity.

Mr. Crampton, who had already accepted the contract for laying the cable

between England and France, and had given up much of his time to the

study of the subject, adopted this idea, and in 1851 he and several

gentlemen associated for the purpose laid the cable between Dover and

Calais, where it has since remained in perfect order, constituting the

great channel of electrical communication between England and the

Continent. It was made by Wilkins & Weatherly, Newall & Co., Küper &

Co., and Mr. Crampton. The exertions of the last-named eminent engineer

in laying the first cable under water, and his devotion to an object

towards which he largely contributed in money, are only known to a few,

and have never been adequately acknowledged.

The success of that form of cable having been thus completely

established, several lines of a similar character were laid during the

following years between England and Ireland and parts of the Continent:

one, 18 miles long, across the Great Belt, made by Newall & Co.; one

from Dover to Ostend, by the same makers and by Küper & Co.; one from

Donaghadee to Portpatrick, by Newall & Co.; one from Holyhead to Howth;

and one from Orfordness to the Hague.

The superiority of a line with wire-rope cover to other descriptions of

cable was illustrated in 1853. At that period the Electric and

International Telegraph Company determined upon laying down four wires

between England and the Continent, but they rejected the heavy cable,

and adopted the suggestion of their engineer to use four separate

cables of light wire. The cost of maintaining these light cables from

injury by anchors, &c., was so great that they were picked up, and heavy

cables of great strength were substituted, which have given no trouble

or anxiety, and have always been in good order.

The Old World had twelve lines of submarine cable laid ere the United

States turned their attention to the uses of such forms of telegraph.

Italy had been connected with Corsica by a line 110 miles long, and

Denmark had joined one of her little islands to the other, ere the Great

Republic gave a thought to the matter. But there were excuses for such

indifference. The Telegraphic system, to which Morse, Bain, House, and

others, had given such development, although the first line was not

constructed till 1844, extended rapidly all over the vast extent of the

Atlantic and Gulf States. The people were on the same continent, the

land was all their own, their greatest rivers could be traversed by

wires; and so it was that, whilst Mr. Morse was engaged in protecting

his patents, and the Americans, self-contained, were not looking beyond

the limits of their shores, a British North American Province took the

first step which was made at the other side of the Atlantic to lay down

a submarine cable. In 1851-2 a project was started in Newfoundland, to

run a line of steamers between Galway and St. John’s in connection with

a telegraph to Cape Ray, where a submarine Cable was to be laid to Cape

Breton, and thence the news was to be carried by means of another cable

from New Brunswick to Prince Edward’s Island. The Roman Catholic Bishop

of Newfoundland is stated to have been the original proposer of a scheme

for connecting the island with the United States, but the credit of

actually laying down the first submarine cable at the other side of the

Atlantic belongs to Mr. F.N. Gisborne, an English engineer. He had been

previously engaged in the telegraph department at Montreal, and had some

knowledge of the subject, but he happened to be in London at the time of

Brett’s success. On his return to America he applied himself to get up a

Company for the purpose of facilitating telegraphic communication

between Europe and the United States. After much difficulty the Company

was formed, and an Act was passed by the Legislature of Newfoundland, in

1852, conferring the important privileges upon it, in event of the

completion of the project in Newfoundland, which are now possessed by

the Atlantic Telegraph Company. Mr. Gisborne was superintendent and

engineer of the Company, and he set to work with energy to construct a

road from St John’s to Cape Ray, over a barren and resourceless tract of

400 miles, and made a survey of the coast line, during which he was

exposed to great hardships. He succeeded at last in laying an insulated

cable, made by Newall & Co., from New Brunswick to Prince Edward’s

Island across the Straits of Northumberland, 11 miles long, in 22

fathoms of water; but was not successful in a similar attempt to connect

Newfoundland with Cape Breton. Meantime the Company became involved in

pecuniary difficulties, and Mr. Gisborne, early in 1854, on the

suspension of the works, proceeded to New York, where he hoped to find

money to enable him to carry out the telegraphic scheme among the keen

speculators and large-pursed merchants. Through an accidental

conversation at the hotel in which he was staying, he obtained an

interview with Mr. Cyrus Field. He laid his plans before that gentleman,

who had no desire to resume an active career, having just returned from

travelling in South America, with the intention of enjoying the fortune

his industry and sagacity had secured ere he had arrived at the middle

term of life. But Mr. Field listened to Mr. Gisborne with attention, and

then began to think over the project--“To lay these submarine cables so

as to connect Newfoundland with Maine?--Good. To run a line of steamers

from St. John’s to Galway?--Certainly. It would shorten the time of

receiving news in New York from Europe four or five days.” And so the

brain worked and thought. Then suddenly, “But if a cable can be laid in

the bed of these seas--if the Great Atlantic itself could be spanned?”

Here was an idea indeed. Deep and broad seas had been traversed in

Europe, but here was one of the great oceans of the world, of depth but

faintly guessed at, and of nigh 2000 miles span from shore to shore!

Would it be within the limits of human resources to let down a line into

the watery void, and to connect the Old World with the New? What a

glorious thought! Was it a vision, or was it one of those inspirations

from which originate grand enterprises and results which change the

destinies of the world? Mr. Field terminated his reflections that night

by an eminently practical measure. Ere he retired to rest he sat down

and wrote two letters,--one to Lieut. Maury, U.S.N., to ask his opinion

concerning the possibility of laying down a cable in the bottom of the

Atlantic; the other to Professor Morse, to inquire whether he thought it

practicable to send an electric current through a wire between Europe

and America. Lieut Maury, in answering in the affirmative, wrote,

“Curiously enough, when your letter came I was looking over my letter to

the Secretary of the Navy on that very subject.” And, in fact, on the

22nd February, 1854, Lieut. Maury made a long communication to Mr.

Dobbin, Secretary, United States Navy, from the Observatory, Washington,

respecting a series of deep-sea soundings made by Lieut. Berryman,

U.S.N., brig Dolphin, from Newfoundland to Ireland, in connection with

researches on the winds and currents, carried on for the National

Observatory. It is obvious that Lieut. Maury, as well as many others

probably, had thought of the same idea as Mr. Field. He says, “The

result is highly interesting, in so far as the bottom of the sea is

concerned, upon the question of a submarine telegraph across the

Atlantic;” and he goes on to make it the subject of a special report, in

which occur the following passages;--

“This line of deep-sea soundings seems to be decisive of the question as

to the practicability of a Submarine Telegraph between the two

continents, in so far as the bottom of the deep sea is concerned. From

Newfoundland to Ireland, the distance between the nearest points is

about 1,600 miles;[1] and the bottom of the sea between the two places

is a plateau, which seems to have been placed there especially for the

purpose of holding the wires of a Submarine Telegraph, and of keeping

them out of harm’s way. It is neither too deep nor too shallow; yet it

is so deep that the wires, but once landed, will remain for ever beyond

the reach of vessels’ anchors, icebergs, and drifts of any kind, and so

shallow that the wires may be readily lodged upon the bottom. The depth

of this plateau is quite regular, gradually increasing from the shores

of Newfoundland to the depth of from 1,500 to 2000 fathoms as you

approach the other side. The distance between Ireland and Cape St.

Charles, or Cape St. Lewis, in Labrador, is somewhat less than the

distance from any point of Ireland to the nearest point of Newfoundland.

But whether it would be better to lead the wires from Newfoundland or

Labrador is not now the question; nor do I pretend to consider the

question as to the possibility of finding a time calm enough, the sea

smooth enough, a wire long enough, a ship big enough, to lay a coil of

wire 1,600 miles in length; though I have no fear but that the

enterprise and ingenuity of the age, whenever called on with these

problems, will be ready with a satisfactory and practical solution of

them.

“I simply address myself at this time to the question in so far as the

bottom of the sea is concerned, and as far as that the greatest

practical difficulties will, I apprehend, be found after reaching

soundings at either end of the line, and not in the deep sea. * *

Therefore, so far as the bottom of the deep sea between Newfoundland, or

the North Cape, at the mouth of the St. Lawrence, and Ireland, is

concerned, the practicability of a Submarine Telegraph across the

Atlantic is proved.”

Professor Morse, in 1843, indicated his conviction that a magnetic

current could be conveyed across the Atlantic, and his reply to Mr.

Field was now given with increased confidence to the same effect. Thus

encouraged, Mr. Field took measures to form a Company to purchase the

rights of the Newfoundland Company, and to connect Newfoundland with

Ireland by means of a submarine telegraph across the Atlantic. He

entered into an agreement with Mr. Gisborne for the purchase of the

privileges of the Company for 8000_l._, under certain conditions. Then

he put down the names of ten of the principal capitalists in New York,

and proceeded to unfold his project to each in succession; and having

secured the adhesion of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Roberts, Mr. White,

and the advice of his brother, Mr. D. Field, he called a meeting of

these gentlemen at his house on 7th March. Similar meetings took place

at his residence on 8th, 9th, and 10th, and after full discussion and

consideration it was resolved to form “The New York, Newfoundland, and

London Telegraph Company,” of which Peter Cooper was President; Moses

Taylor, Treasurer; Cyrus Field, C. White, M. O. Roberts, Directors; and

D. D. Field, Counsel. Mr. C. Field, his brother, and Mr. White were

commissioned to proceed to Newfoundland, to obtain from the Legislature

an act of incorporation, and set out for that purpose on March 15th. On

their arrival at St. John’s, the Governor convoked the Executive

Council. He also sent a special message to the Legislature, then in

session, recommending them to pass an act of incorporation, with a

guarantee of interest on the Company’s bonds to the amount of

50,000_l._, and to make them a grant of fifty square miles of land on

the island of Newfoundland, conditional on the completion of the

Telegraph.

After some little delay, the Legislature, with one adverse member only,

granted the valuable privileges to the Company which were subsequently

transferred to the Atlantic Telegraph Company. They constitute, in fact,

a monopoly of telegraphic rights in Newfoundland, the value of which was

enhanced afterwards by similar concessions from the state of Maine, Nova

Scotia, Prince Edward’s Island; and liberal encouragement from Canada.

There is much to be said against concessions, and monopolies, and

patents, on abstract grounds; but it is quite clear that in certain

circumstances men will not venture money and spend time, without the

prospect of the ulterior advantages such protection is calculated to

ensure. The Government has, however, informed Colonial and Provincial

Legislatures that in future Her Majesty will be advised not to give her

ratification to the creation of similar monopolies. By their chartered

rights the new Company obtained the exclusive privilege for fifty years

of landing cables on Newfoundland and Labrador, which embraces a coast

extending southwardly to Prince Edward’s Island, Cape Breton, Nova

Scotia, the State of Maine, and their respective dependencies; and

westwardly to the very entrance of Hudson’s Straits. The Company also

secured a grant of fifty square miles of land on the completion of

Telegraph to Cape Breton; a similar concession of additional fifty

square miles when the Cable shall have been laid between Ireland and

Newfoundland; a guarantee of interest for twenty years at 5 per cent.

on 50,000_l._; a grant of 5000_l._ in money towards building a road

along the line of the Telegraph; and the remission of duties on the

importation of all wires and materials for the use of the Company.

The Company also obtained from the Legislature of Prince Edward’s

Island, in May, 1854, the exclusive privilege for fifty years of landing

cables on the coast; a free grant of one thousand acres of land; and a

grant of 300_l._ currency per annum for ten years.

From Canada the Company obtained an Act authorising the building of

telegraph lines throughout the Provinces, accompanied by the remission

of duties on all wires and materials imported for the use of the

Company.

Nova Scotia, in 1859, gave the Company a grant of exclusive privilege,

for twenty-five years, of landing telegraphic cables from Europe on the

shores of the Province.

The State of Maine accorded the Company a grant of the exclusive

privilege, for twenty-five years, of landing European telegraph cables

on the seaboard.

From Great Britain eventually the Company obtained an annual subsidy of

14,000_l._ sterling until the net profits of the Company should reach 6

per cent. per annum, on the whole capital of 350,000_l._ sterling, the

grant to be then reduced to 10,000_l._ sterling per annum, for a period

of twenty-five years; two of the largest steamships in the navy to lay

the cable, and two steamers to aid them; and a careful examination of

the soundings by vessels of the Royal Navy.

From the United States the Company obtained an annual subsidy of $70,000

until the net profits yielded 6 per cent. per annum, then to be reduced

to $50,000 per annum, for a period of twenty-five years, subject to

termination of contract by Congress after ten years, on giving one

year’s notice. The United States government also granted the steamship

Arctic to make soundings, and steam-ships Niagara and Susquehanna to

assist in laying the cable. A government steamer was also ordered to

make further soundings on the coast of Newfoundland.

Long ere the Company had been placed in possession of such beneficial

rights, and obtained such a large amount of favour, Mr. Field, who threw

every energy of body and mind into the work, and was entrusted by his

brother directors with the general management of affairs, proceeded to

carry out the engagements the Company had entered into with the local

legislatures. It has been said that the greatest boons conferred on

mankind have been due to men of one idea. If the laying of the Atlantic

Cable be among these benefits, its consummation may certainly be

attributed to the man who, having many ideas, devoted himself to work

out one idea with a gentle force and a patient vigour which converted

opposition and overcame indifference. Mr. Field may be likened either to

the core, or to the external protection, of the Cable itself. At times

he has been its active life; again he has been its iron-bound guardian.

Let who will claim the merit of first having said the Atlantic Cable was

possible, to Mr. Field is due the inalienable credit of having made it

possible, and of giving to an abortive conception all the attributes of

healthy existence.

The first step in the great enterprise, now fairly inaugurated, was the

connection of St. John’s with the telegraphic lines already in operation

in Canada and the United States.

Mr. Field was despatched to England, as there were no firms established

for the manufacture of submarine cables in the United States, to order

the necessary work to be done, and to raise money. He previously ordered

specimens of cable to be made, so that when he landed in England they

were ready for his inspection; and soon after his arrival he entered

into a contract with Messrs. Küper & Co. (subsequently Glass, Elliot, &

Co.) for a cable to be laid across the Gulf of St. Lawrence. He held

interviews with eminent engineers and electricians, among whom were Mr.

Brunel, Mr. (now Sir C.) Bright, Mr. Brett, and Mr. Whitehouse,

respecting his larger project, which led to extended and valuable

experiments. The cable for Newfoundland was formed in three strands, and

had three conducting wires; and Mr. Field undertook to lay it, under the

direction of Mr. Canning. In August, 1855, the first attempt was made;

but off Cape Ray a violent gale arose, and it was deemed necessary by

the master of the vessel to cut the cable. This disappointment was not

in the least a discouragement. Another contract was made by Mr. Field

with Messrs. Küper & Co. to make and lay a cable at their own risk,

which was executed by Mr. Canning in the Propontis the following year.

The station is at Point-au-Basque, near the western extremity of

Newfoundland, and the telegraph runs across the island to Trinity Bay.

The opportunities for scientific experiments afforded by the manufacture

of these cables were not neglected. The possibility of transmitting

signals under water without fatal loss of power from the increased

length of circuit was the first fact determined. The attention of the

experimentalists was then directed to ascertain whether, having regard

to existing theories, it would be possible to carry even a single

conductor across the Atlantic without the aid of a cable so ponderous

and so costly as to render it useless in a commercial point of view. A

series of direct experiments were at once undertaken, which resulted in

the establishment of the following facts:--first, that retardation of

movement, in consequence of increasing distance, did not occur at a rate

which could seriously affect a cable across the Atlantic; secondly, that

increased dimensions in insulated marine conductors augmented the

difficulties in obtaining velocity, so that bulk in a cable would not be

requisite; and, thirdly, that a velocity and facility which would

satisfy all mere commercial and financial requirements in a line

crossing the Atlantic, might be attained in the largest circuits. The

next step was to actually make signals through 2000 miles of wire. This

was accomplished through the kindness of the directors of the English

and Irish Magnetic Company, who placed at the disposal of the

experimentalists 5000 miles of under-ground wire. On the 9th of October,

1856, in the quiet of the night time, the experiment was tried

successfully. Signals were distinctly and satisfactorily telegraphed

through 2000 miles of wire, at the rate of 210, 241, and 270 per minute.

There was still a matter of the last importance to be determined. Was

the state of the bed of the Atlantic really such as to warrant the

conclusion that a wire 2000 miles long could be deposited and remain

there without injury?

Mr. Field, in order to ascertain this fact, obtained from the government

of America the assistance of Lieut. Berryman, U.S.N., in the steam-ship

Arctic, who succeeded, in July, 1856, in taking soundings across the

Atlantic at distances varying from 30 to 50 miles, and, by means of

scoops, or quills, bringing up specimens of the bottom, which, upon

microscopic examination, proved to be composed of fine shells and sand.

As capital was needed for the execution of the enterprise which the

confidence of moneyed men in the United States did not induce them to

supply, and as it was desirable to enlist the support of the capitalists

of Great Britain, Mr. Field was now authorised to form a company, with

branches in both countries. Having secured the services of Mr. Brett,

Mr. (now Sir C.) Bright, Mr. Woodhouse, and others, on the 1st of

November, 1856, as Vice-President of the New York, Newfoundland, and

London Telegraph Company, he issued an elaborate, able, and

argumentative circular in London, headed, “Atlantic Telegraph,” and made

a tour through the great towns, addressing meetings in support of the

project.

On the 6th of November, 1856, the prospectus was issued, with a nominal

capital of 350,000_l._, represented by 350 shares of 1000_l._ each, and

within one month the entire of the capital had been subscribed for, and

the first instalment of 70.000_l._ paid up.

One hundred and six shares were taken in London, eighty-eight in the

United States, eighty-six in Liverpool, thirty-seven in Glasgow, and the

remainder in other parts of England. Mr. Field stood as subscriber of

88,000_l._, and represented all America.

But it was not only from the public of Great Britain the project met

encouragement. Ere the new company was formed, Mr. Field (13th

September, 1855) addressed Lord Clarendon, requesting aid, and

protection and privileges, and on the 20th November received a reply

from the Secretary to the Treasury, engaging to furnish ships for

soundings, and to consider favourably any request for help in laying the

Cable, to pay 14,000_l._ (4 per cent. on capital) as remuneration for

Government messages, till the net profits were 6 per cent., when the

payment was to become 10,000_l._ for twenty-five years, and the Royal

assent was given to the Act of Incorporation of the Company July 27th,

1857.

Mr. Field received far more encouragement in Great Britain, in

Parliament and out of it, than he did at home. His bill was nearly

rejected in the United States Senate, and it is stated only twenty-seven

shares of the first stock were at first subscribed for in the States. On

the motion of Mr. Seward, a resolution was passed in the Senate, United

States, on the 23rd December, in compliance with which the President

transmitted a copy of an application from the New York Office of the New

York, Newfoundland, and London Telegraph Company, dated December 15th,

in which the Directors set forth “their earnest desire to secure for the

United States Government equal privileges with those stipulated for by

the British Government in a work prosecuted thus far with American

capital,” and then recounted the terms agreed to by the Lords of the

Treasury. On January 9th, 1857, Mr. Seward introduced a bill in the

Senate to give and receive precisely the same privileges on the part of

the United States Government. It was violently opposed, was only carried

by one vote, and was not approved till March 3rd following.

The money being now forthcoming, the Provisional Directors of the

Company proceeded to order the Atlantic Cable. Mr. Field was anxious

that the order should be given to the firm which had manufactured the

St. Lawrence Cable, but the Board thought it would be better to divide

the contract, and on the 6th December, 1856, they entered upon

agreements with the Gutta Percha Company for the supply of 2,500 miles

of core, consisting of copper wire, with a triple covering of insulating

substance, at 40_l._ per mile; and also with Messrs. Glass, Elliot, &

Co., of East Greenwich, and Messrs. Newall & Co., of Birkenhead,

respectively, for the supply from each of 1,250 miles of the completed

Cable for 62,000_l._ Within six months from that day, namely, on the 6th

of July, 1857, the entire Cable was completed.

The policy of dividing the contract for the manufacture of the Cable was

questioned at the time. When one portion of the Cable was to be made at

East Greenwich and the other at Birkenhead, how was it possible that

there could be any uniformity of supervision, any integrity of design,

or any individual responsibility? Again, how was it possible that the

textile strength or conducting power of the Cable could be tested as

satisfactorily as would have been the case were its manufacture

entrusted to one firm? And, as it happened, the twist ran from right to

left in one half, and from left to right in the other half of the Cable.

Before the prospectus was issued, every attention was paid that the

characteristics of the Cable should be suited to its work; that it

should not be too dense, lest its weight should render it unmanageable

in the sea--nor too light, lest it should be at the mercy of the

currents as it went down. It was decided that it should weigh a ton per

mile, should be just so much heavier than the water which it displaced

in sinking, and of such structure as could be easily coiled and yet be a

rigid line, while its centre should be composed of wire capable of

conveying electrical symbols through an extent of more than 2000 miles,

and should retain complete insulation when immersed in the ocean. It was

a subject of close and anxious inquiry how to obtain a Cable of this

form and character. No fewer than sixty-two different kinds of rope were

tested before one was determined on.

In the Cable finally adopted, the central conducting wire was a strand

made up of seven wires of the purest copper, of the gauge known in the

trade as No. 22. The strand itself was about the sixteenth of an inch in

diameter, and was formed of one straightly drawn wire, with six others

twisted round it; this was accomplished by the central wire being

dragged from a drum through a hole in a horizontal table, while the

table itself revolved rapidly, under the impulse of steam, carrying near

its circumference six reels or drums each armed with copper wire. Every

drum revolved upon its own horizontal axis, and so delivered its wire as

it turned. This twisted form of conducting wire was first adopted for

the rope laid across the Gulf of St. Lawrence in 1856, and was employed

with a view to the reduction to the lowest possible amount of the chance

of continuity being destroyed in the circuit. It seemed improbable in

the highest degree that a fracture could be accidentally produced at

precisely the same spot in more than one of the wires of this twisted

strand. All the seven wires might be broken at different parts of the

strand, even some hundreds of times, and yet its capacity for the

transmission of the electric current not destroyed, or reduced in any

inconvenient degree. The copper used in the formation of these wires was

assayed from time to time during the manufacture to insure absolute

homogeneity and purity. The strand itself, when subjected to strain,

stretched 20 per cent. of its length without giving way, and indeed

without having its conducting power much modified or impaired.

The copper strand of the Cable was rolled up on drums as it was

completed, and was then taken from the drums to receive a coating of

three separate layers of refined gutta percha; these brought its

diameter up to about three-eighths of an inch. The coating of gutta

percha was made unusually thick, for the sake of diminishing the

influence of induction, and in order that the insulation might be

rendered as perfect as possible. This latter object was also furthered

by the several layers of the insulating material being laid on in

succession; so that if there were accidentally any flaw in the one coat,

the imperfection was sure to be removed when the next deposit was added.

To prove the efficacy of the proceeding, a great number of holes were

made near together in the first coating of a fragment of the wire, and

the second coat was then applied in the usual way. The insulation of the

strand was found to be perfect under these circumstances, and continued

so even when the core was subjected to hydraulic pressure, amounting to

five tons on the square inch. The gutta percha which was employed for

the coating of the conducting strand, was prepared with the utmost

possible care. Lumps of the crude substance were first rasped down by a

revolving toothed cylinder, placed within a hollow case, the whole piece

of apparatus somewhat resembling the agricultural turnip machine in its

mode of action. The raspings were then passed between rollers, macerated

in hot water, and well churned. They were next washed in cold water, and

driven at a boiling-water temperature, by hydraulic power, through

wire-gauze sieves, attached to the bottom of wide vertical pipes. The

gutta percha came out from the sieves in plastic masses of exceeding

purity and fineness, and those masses were then squeezed and kneaded for

hours by screws, revolving in hollow cylinders, called masticators; this

was done to get the water out, and to render the substance of the gutta

percha sound and homogeneous everywhere. At each turn of the screw, the

plastic mass protruded itself through an opening left for feeding in the

upper part of the masticator, and was then drawn back as the screw

rolled on. When the mechanical texture of the refined mass was perfected

by masticating and kneading, it was placed in horizontal cylinders,

heated by steam, and squeezed through them by screw pistons, driven down

by the machinery very slowly, and with resistless force. The gutta

percha emerged, under this pressure, through a die, which received the

termination of both cylinders, and which at the same time had the strand

of copper wire moving along through its centre. The strands were drawn

by revolving drums between the cylinders, and through the die. They

entered the die naked bright copper wire, and issued from it thick,

dull-looking cords, a complete coating of gutta percha having been

attached to them as they traversed the die. Six strands were coated

together, ranging along side by side at the first covering. Then a

series of three lengths of the strand received the second coat together.

The third coat was communicated to a solitary strand. The strand and

its triple coating of gutta percha were together designated “the core.”

[Illustration: F. Jones, lith from a drawing by R. Dudley

London, Day & Sons, Limited, Lith.

THE REELS OF GUTTA PERCHA COVERED CONDUCTING WIRE CONVEYED INTO TANKS AT

THE WORKS AT GREENWICH.]

[Illustration: R. M. Bryson, lith from a drawing by R. Dudley London,

Day & Sons, Limited, Lith.

VALENCIA IN 1857-1858 AT THE TIME OF THE LAYING OF THE FORMER CABLE.]

The copper strand was formed and coated with gutta percha in two mile

lengths. Each of these lengths, when completed, was immersed in water,

and then carefully tested to prove that its continuity and insulation

were both perfect. The continuity was ascertained by passing a voltaic

current of low power through the strand from a battery of a single pair

of plates, and causing it to record a signal after issuing from the

wire. A different and very remarkable plan was adopted to determine the

amount of insulation. One pole of a voltaic battery, consisting of 500

pairs of plates, was connected with the earth; the other pole was united

to a wire which coiled round the needle of a very sensitive horizontal

galvanometer, and then ran on into the insulated strand of the core, the

end of which was turned up into the air, and left without any conducting

communication. If the insulation was perfect, the earth would form one

pole of the battery, and the end of the insulated strand the other pole,

and the circuit be quite open and uninterrupted; consequently no current

would pass, and the needle of the galvanometer would not be deflected in

the slightest degree. If on the other hand there was any imperfection,

or permeability in the sheath of gutta percha, a portion of the

electricity would force its way from the strand through the faulty

places and surrounding water to the earth, a current would be set up,

and the needle of the galvanometer deflected; the deflection being in

proportion to the current which passed, and therefore its degree would

become a measure of the amount of imperfection.

When about fifty of the two-mile lengths of core were ready, these were

placed in the water of the canal which ran past the gutta percha works,

and were joined up by their ends into one continuous strand of 100

miles, the joints being covered with gutta percha. The hundred-mile

length was then put through a careful scrutiny in the same way that the

smaller portions were tried,--and next it was halved, quartered, and

separated into groups of twenty, ten, and finally two miles, and each of

these were again separately examined, and tested in comparison with

similar lengths previously approved.

Whenever separate lengths of the gutta percha covered core were to be

joined together, the gutta percha was scraped away for a short distance

from the ends, and these were made to overlap. A piece of copper wire

was then attached by firm brazing, an inch or two beyond the joint on

one side, tightly bound round until it reached to the same extent on the

other side, and then was there firmly brazed on again. A second binding

was next rolled over the first in the same fashion, and extended a

little way beyond it, and finally several layers of gutta percha were

carefully laid over, and all round the joint by the agency of hot irons.

If the core on each side of the joint was dragged opposite ways until

the joint yielded, the outer investment of the wire unrolled spirally as

the ends were pulled asunder, and so the conducting continuity of the

strand was maintained, although the mechanical continuity of the strand

itself was broken.

The two-mile coils of completed and proved core were wound on large

drums with projecting flanges on each side, the rims of which were shod

with iron tires, so that they might be rolled about as broad wheels, and

made to perform their own locomotive offices as far as possible. When

the core was in position on these channelled drums, the circumference of

the drum was closed in carefully by a sheet of gutta percha, which thus

constituted its core-filled channel a sort of cylindrical box or packing

case. In this snug nest each completed coil of core was wheeled and

dragged away to be transferred to the manufactory, either at Birkenhead

or Greenwich.

The core-filled drums, having arrived at the factory of the Cable, the

drums were mounted by axles, and kept ready so that one extremity of the

length of core might be attached to the Cable as it was spun out, when

the drum previously in use had been exhausted. During the unrolling of

the core from the drum, it was wound tightly round by a serving of hemp,

saturated with a composition made chiefly of pitch and tar, the winding

being effected by revolving bobbins as the core was drawn along. This

hempen serving constituted a bed for the external coat of metallic

wires, and prevented the insulating sheath of gutta percha from being

injured by pressure during the final stage of the construction. Each new

length of core was attached to the Cable by precisely the same operation

as that used at the gutta percha works in joining the two-mile coils for

testing; shortly before an old drum was exhausted, its remainder was

rapidly pulled off and placed in the joiner’s hands, so that it might be

made continuous with the core on a new drum, before the outgoing Cable

began to draw upon it.

The Atlantic Telegraph (1865) · 第 1 / 13 段