CHAPTER XVI

A PROCEEDING OF SOME AMBASSADORS

I observe in my travels this custom, ever to learn something from the

information of those with whom I confer (which is the best school of all

others), and to put my company upon those subjects they are the best able

to speak of:--

“Basti al nocchiero ragionar de’ venti,

Al bifolco dei tori; et le sue piaghe

Conti’l guerrier; conti’l pastor gli armenti.”

[“Let the sailor content himself with talking of the winds; the

cowherd of his oxen; the soldier of his wounds; the shepherd of his

flocks.”--An Italian translation of Propertius, ii. i, 43]

For it often falls out that, on the contrary, every one will rather

choose to be prating of another man’s province than his own, thinking it

so much new reputation acquired; witness the jeer Archidamus put upon

Pertander, “that he had quitted the glory of being an excellent physician

to gain the repute of a very bad poet.--[Plutarch, Apoth. of the

Lacedaemonians, ‘in voce’ Archidamus.]--And do but observe how large and

ample Caesar is to make us understand his inventions of building bridges

and contriving engines of war,--[De Bello Gall., iv. 17.]--and how

succinct and reserved in comparison, where he speaks of the offices of

his profession, his own valour, and military conduct. His exploits

sufficiently prove him a great captain, and that he knew well enough; but

he would be thought an excellent engineer to boot; a quality something

different, and not necessary to be expected in him. The elder Dionysius

was a very great captain, as it befitted his fortune he should be; but he

took very great pains to get a particular reputation by poetry, and yet

he was never cut out for a poet. A man of the legal profession being not

long since brought to see a study furnished with all sorts of books, both

of his own and all other faculties, took no occasion at all to entertain

himself with any of them, but fell very rudely and magisterially to

descant upon a barricade placed on the winding stair before the study

door, a thing that a hundred captains and common soldiers see every day

without taking any notice or offence.

“Optat ephippia bos piger, optat arare caballus.”

[“The lazy ox desires a saddle and bridle; the horse wants to

plough.”--Hor., Ep., i. 14,43.]

By this course a man shall never improve himself, nor arrive at any

perfection in anything. He must, therefore, make it his business always

to put the architect, the painter, the statuary, every mechanic artisan,

upon discourse of their own capacities.

And, to this purpose, in reading histories, which is everybody’s subject,

I use to consider what kind of men are the authors: if they be persons

that profess nothing but mere letters, I, in and from them, principally

observe and learn style and language; if physicians, I the rather incline

to credit what they report of the temperature of the air, of the health

and complexions of princes, of wounds and diseases; if lawyers, we are

from them to take notice of the controversies of rights and wrongs, the

establishment of laws and civil government, and the like; if divines, the

affairs of the Church, ecclesiastical censures, marriages, and

dispensations; if courtiers, manners and ceremonies; if soldiers, the

things that properly belong to their trade, and, principally, the

accounts of the actions and enterprises wherein they were personally

engaged; if ambassadors, we are to observe negotiations, intelligences,

and practices, and the manner how they are to be carried on.

And this is the reason why (which perhaps I should have lightly passed

over in another) I dwelt upon and maturely considered one passage in the

history written by Monsieur de Langey, a man of very great judgment in

things of that nature: after having given a narrative of the fine oration

Charles V. had made in the Consistory at Rome, and in the presence of the

Bishop of Macon and Monsieur du Velly, our ambassadors there, wherein he

had mixed several injurious expressions to the dishonour of our nation;

and amongst the rest, “that if his captains and soldiers were not men of

another kind of fidelity, resolution, and sufficiency in the knowledge of

arms than those of the King, he would immediately go with a rope about

his neck and sue to him for mercy” (and it should seem the Emperor had

really this, or a very little better opinion of our military men, for he

afterwards, twice or thrice in his life, said the very same thing); as

also, that he challenged the King to fight him in his shirt with rapier

and poignard in a boat. The said Sieur de Langey, pursuing his history,

adds that the forenamed ambassadors, sending a despatch to the King of

these things, concealed the greatest part, and particularly the last two

passages. At which I could not but wonder that it should be in the power

of an ambassador to dispense with anything which he ought to signify to

his master, especially of so great importance as this, coming from the

mouth of such a person, and spoken in so great an assembly; and I should

rather conceive it had been the servant’s duty faithfully to have

represented to him the whole thing as it passed, to the end that the

liberty of selecting, disposing, judging, and concluding might have

remained in him: for either to conceal or to disguise the truth for fear

he should take it otherwise than he ought to do, and lest it should

prompt him to some extravagant resolution, and, in the meantime, to leave

him ignorant of his affairs, should seem, methinks, rather to belong to

him who is to give the law than to him who is only to receive it; to him

who is in supreme command, and not to him who ought to look upon himself

as inferior, not only in authority, but also in prudence and good

counsel. I, for my part, would not be so served in my little concerns.

We so willingly slip the collar of command upon any pretence whatever,

and are so ready to usurp upon dominion, every one does so naturally

aspire to liberty and power, that no utility whatever derived from the

wit or valour of those he employs ought to be so dear to a superior as a

downright and sincere obedience. To obey more upon the account of

understanding than of subjection, is to corrupt the office of command

--[Taken from Aulus Gellius, i. 13.]--; insomuch that P. Crassus, the same

whom the Romans reputed five times happy, at the time when he was consul

in Asia, having sent to a Greek engineer to cause the greater of two

masts of ships that he had taken notice of at Athens to be brought to

him, to be employed about some engine of battery he had a design to make;

the other, presuming upon his own science and sufficiency in those

affairs, thought fit to do otherwise than directed, and to bring the

less, which, according to the rules of art, was really more proper for

the use to which it was designed; but Crassus, though he gave ear to his

reasons with great patience, would not, however, take them, how sound or

convincing soever, for current pay, but caused him to be well whipped for

his pains, valuing the interest of discipline much more than that of the

work in hand.

Notwithstanding, we may on the other side consider that so precise and

implicit an obedience as this is only due to positive and limited

commands. The employment of ambassadors is never so confined, many

things in their management of affairs being wholly referred to the

absolute sovereignty of their own conduct; they do not simply execute,

but also, to their own discretion and wisdom, form and model their

master’s pleasure. I have, in my time, known men of command checked for

having rather obeyed the express words of the king’s letters, than the

necessity of the affairs they had in hand. Men of understanding do yet,

to this day, condemn the custom of the kings of Persia to give their

lieutenants and agents so little rein, that, upon the least arising

difficulties, they must fain have recourse to their further commands;

this delay, in so vast an extent of dominion, having often very much

prejudiced their affairs; and Crassus, writing to a man whose profession

it was best to understand those things, and pre-acquainting him to what

use this mast was designed, did he not seem to consult his advice, and in

a manner invite him to interpose his better judgment?

Essays of Michel de Montaigne — Complete · 第 16 / 73 章