CHAPTER III.

RETURN OF GRIJALVA. A NEW EXPEDITION ORGANIZED.

1518.

REFUSAL OF GRIJALVA TO SETTLE—ALVARADO SENT BACK TO

CUBA—GRIJALVA CONTINUES HIS DISCOVERY—AFTER REACHING

THE PROVINCE OF PÁNUCO HE TURNS BACK—TOUCHING AT THE

RIO GOAZACOALCO, TONALÁ, THE LAGUNA DE TÉRMINOS, AND

CHAMPOTON, THE EXPEDITION RETURNS TO CUBA—GRIJALVA TRADUCED

AND DISCHARGED—A NEW EXPEDITION PLANNED—VELAZQUEZ SENDS

TO SANTO DOMINGO AND SPAIN—CHARACTERS OF VELAZQUEZ AND

GRIJALVA CONTRASTED—CANDIDATES FOR THE CAPTAINCY OF THE NEW

EXPEDITION—THE ALCALDE OF SANTIAGO SUCCESSFUL—HIS STANDING AT

THAT TIME.

At various places during this expedition, notably where is now

Vera Cruz, and at the River Tabasco, both in coming and returning,

Grijalva’s men begged permission to settle and subdue the country. In

their desire to remain they pictured to themselves all the pleasures

of the abandoned crew of Ulysses, in a land as happy as that of which

Horace sang, where Ceres decked untilled fields with sheaves and

Bacchus revelled under purple-clustered vines. And they were angry with

their commander for not breaking the instructions which forbade his

colonizing. Pedro de Alvarado was particularly chafed by the restraint,

though he kept his temper until he obtained permission to return to

Cuba with one of the vessels[37] which had become unseaworthy, so as

to report to the governor the progress of the discovery, and obtain

recruits and fresh supplies, with permission to found a colony.

Beside some fifty sick persons, all the gold, cotton, and other

articles obtained from the natives thus far were placed in Alvarado’s

ship, which sailed the 24th of June. The remainder of the expedition

continued its now north-westward course past Nautla,[38] which the

Spaniards called Almería, and with the mountains of Tuxpan[39] in full

view, advanced as far as Cabo Rojo, some say as far as the Rio de

Pánuco.[40] The entrance to the large lagoon now known as the Bahía

de Tanguijo, was mistaken for a river and named Rio de Canoas. On

anchoring here the ships of the Spaniards were fiercely attacked by

the occupants of twelve canoes,[41] which came out from a large city

compared by the worthy chaplain to Seville in size and magnificence,

in common with other towns along this seaboard; and as if this were

not strange enough, the same authority goes on to relate a miracle

which happened here because Grijalva refused the soldiers leave to

sack the place; how a star, poised above the fleet after sunset, shot

toward the town and hung over it invitingly, as if Jehovah signified

his pleasure that the Christians should seize the city.[42]

After beating back the canoes the Spaniards proceeded, but found

their course impeded by the currents off Cabo Rojo; from which

circumstance, together with the hostility of the natives, the rapidity

with which the season was advancing, and the condition of the ships,

they determined to return. Turning toward the southward, therefore,

they were carried past the River Goazacoalco by boisterous winds, and

entered Tonalá to careen and repair a leaky vessel.[43] Again the

men blasphemed and held the commander in derision because he would

not settle. After several failures in starting they continued the

voyage, encountered bad weather, touched at Deseado for water, engaged

in a parting fight with the natives of Champoton, sailed again, and

the fifth reached San Lázaro, where they were led into ambush while

searching for water, and attacked. After helping themselves to maize

they embarked, followed the shore past Rio de Lagartos, the Comi of

the natives, whence they sailed for Cuba, and arrived at Matanzas

about the first of November.[44]

When Grijalva cast anchor in the bay of Matanzas his heart beat high

with promise. He had returned successful from a brilliant discovery,

in which had begun that pronounced mastery of life which is the

dream of every chivalrous mind. There had been nothing in the least

irrational in his policy, or fickle or factious in his conduct. He

had used diligence and discretion, had been true to his companions,

and faithful to his king and to his chief. Surely his uncle would

praise him, his governor would reward him, and his king would intrust

him with new commissions. So he deserved; so he had every reason to

expect, and hence it was with pride and pleasure that he once more

set foot on Isla Fernandina.

But, unfortunately, this most virtuous cavalier was now destined

to reap the too common reward of honest service in the cause of a

vicious master. Scarcely had Grijalva landed, when a letter from

the governor was placed in his hand, ordering him to repair with his

ships at once to Santiago, and at the same time to notify his soldiers

that opportunity would be quickly given all who desired to embark in

a fresh adventure to New Spain, and that meanwhile they might rest

themselves at the governor’s farms in that vicinity. Then, too, he

first learned how Velazquez, ever fickle and distrustful as are all

timid and unscrupulous men, becoming nervous concerning the fleet,

had sent Cristóbal de Olid in a small vessel with seven soldiers

to search and report; and that on reaching the coast of Yucatan a

storm had obliged the explorer to part with his anchor and return

to Cuba.[45] Before the return of Olid, Alvarado had arrived with

the gold and good tidings from the armada, which gave the governor

unbounded joy. Grijalva had yet to learn, however, how Alvarado,

not forgetting the censure bestowed on him for disobedience, had not

failed to color the conduct of his commander to suit his own ends.

Grijalva’s repeated refusals to colonize were paraded as the gross

mistakes of a stubborn and spiritless man; the coolness and bravery

displayed at Champoton were made to appear as reckless imprudence; and

as the governor thought of the danger to which his adventure had there

been subjected, he became alarmed. “Had I lost all,” he muttered, “it

would have been a just penalty for sending such a fool.” And now both

Dávila and Montejo poured fresh poison into the ear of the governor

respecting his nephew, in revenge for similar fancied injuries; so

that when Grijalva reported himself to Velazquez at Santiago, he was

told to go his way, since the governor had no further use for him.

Indeed, this line of action had been for some time determined on.

Immediately upon the arrival of Alvarado, a new expedition had been

planned, in which Grijalva was not to participate. The latter was hurt,

almost to death. He had conferred a great benefit on this Tiberius

of an uncle; but as affection is heightened by the conferring of

benefits, so it is often lessened by the acceptance of them. Not long

after, Juan de Salcedo was sent to Santo Domingo for permission to

colonize New Spain, and Benito Martin, chaplain and man of business,

was despatched to Spain[46] with a full account of the discovery,

and with gold for the bishop of Búrgos. Haste seemed necessary to

Velazquez lest some one might anticipate and rob him of the honors

and emoluments won through Grijalva’s efforts. Nor were forgotten the

Licentiate Zapata and the Secretary Conchillos; and so happily were

distributed the Indian villages of Cuba among these conscientious men

of Spain, that Velazquez gained all his requests, with the title of

adelantado of Cuba added.

* * * * *

How different the quality of these two men, Velazquez and Grijalva,

and both so widely different from the phœnix now about to rise from

their ashes! The character of the governor was like a candle flame, hot

without and hollow within. Almost as much as gold he loved glory, the

brass and tinsel of it, but lacked both the ability and the courage

to achieve noble distinction. As easily worked upon by designing men

as Othello, there was in him none of the nobility of the Moor; and,

possessing no great integrity himself, he was very ready to suspect

treachery in others.

Grijalva, on the other hand, was the Lysander of New World discovery;

of a modest though manly spirit, obedient to customs and superior

authority, preferring honor and duty to self and pleasure, native

to generous action, the very faults brought out by his enemies shine

brilliant as virtues. He was as chivalrous as any Spaniard that ever

drew steel on naked savage, as brave and talented as any. But he

lacked the unscrupulous positiveness inseparable here from permanent

success. He was resolute in overcoming difficulties, and he was

strong and shrewd enough in the prosecution of any high enterprise,

particularly so long as fortune favored him; but he was no match for

the subtle-minded of his own nation, who overwhelmed him in their show

of learning, backed by imposing forms. All contemporary writers speak

well of him; likewise all the chroniclers, except Gomara, who permits

chivalry no place save in his pet and patron, Cortés. The soldier

Bernal Diaz pronounces him a most worthy officer. The historians

Oviedo and Herrera call him a comely man, thoroughly loyal, and never

backward at fighting. Yet we are told that some censured him, while

others cursed him outright for his conscientiousness, because he did

not break orders and seize opportunity. So ready were they to engage

in the fallacious argument that it was right to do wrong if good might

come of it. To disobey Velazquez, they said, was to break no divine

law; forgetting that the governor derived his authority from the king,

and the king from the Almighty. Of a truth, when force alone is the

standard of right, then honesty is not the best policy. For a time he

carried himself with a brave front, conscious of his integrity, yet

we may say he was laid low forever by the blow misfortune here gave

him.[47] Meanwhile patience, good governor! For soon enough will arise

an agent capable of playing shrewd tricks to your ample contentment.

Before the return of Grijalva, interest in the new expedition had

already raised itself into a whirl of excitement; and as volunteers

pressed forward, the captaincy became an apple of discord among

aspirants. Chief among these were Vasco Porcallo a near relative of the

count of Feria, Antonio Velazquez,[48] and Bernardino Velazquez, the

last two kinsmen of the governor. Another was Baltasar Bermudez,[49]

from Velazquez’ own town, and his intimate friend. None of these

suited. Then followed for the governor nights of troubled dreams and

days of irritable indecision. It was a peculiar personage Velazquez

wanted. He must be, in Mexico, courageous, wise, and prudent; in

Cuba, obedient, teachable. He must be able to command men, to brave

the proudest barbarian, and so fired by enthusiasm in the field as

cheerfully to endure hardships and risk life; his work successfully

accomplished, he must return humbly to Santiago, and lay his trophies

at the feet of his master. Grijalva was most nearly such a man; but

he lacked that subtle second sense which should tell him when it was

the governor’s pleasure to have his orders disobeyed. Porcallo was

competent, but Velazquez was afraid of him. He was scarcely farther

from the throne than himself; and in reporting any important conquest

to the king would prove the greater of the two. The relatives present

were worse, if anything, than Grijalva; besides, they had no means,

and to this position the successful aspirant must bring money as well

as courage and discretion. Bermudez might be eligible, but for his

services, in braving the dangers, and bringing the results of the

expedition to Velazquez, he had the temerity to demand three thousand

ducats. The proposition was not for a moment to be entertained; the

job must be accomplished for less money.

Watchful eyes saw the governor’s dilemma, and artful tongues wagged

opportunely. Near to him in their daily vocations were two men, both

small in stature, but large of head, and broad in experience and

sagacity. One was the governor’s secretary, Andrés de Duero, and

the other the royal contador, Amador de Láres. Both possessed rare

attainments; they were skilled in every artifice, and could make

their master see white or black; while Láres could not write, he had

not failed to profit by a twenty-two years’ career in Italy, during

which time he rose to the honorable distinction of chief butler to the

Gran Capitan, and he seldom found it difficult to move the unstable

Velazquez to his purposes, although they were not always the purest and

best.[50] Following the example of the governor, these two worthies

were not averse to improving their fortunes by securing, at little

risk or expense, an interest in the New Spain conquest; and so they

gave heed when the alcalde of Santiago softly insinuated that he was

the man for the emergency, and that if they would help him to the

command they should share the profits.[51]

* * * * *

The alcalde of Santiago bore a fair reputation, considering the

time and place; for comparatively few names in the New World were

then wholly free from taint. In the prime of manhood, his age being

thirty-three, of full medium stature, well proportioned and muscular,

with full breast, broad shoulders, square full forehead, small straight

spare compact body and well turned limbs, though somewhat bow-legged,

he presented a pleasing rather than imposing front. His portraits

show fine antique features, bearing a somewhat sad expression, which

was increased by the grave tenderness of the dark oval eyes. The full

though thin beard, cut short, counteracted to some extent the effect

of the small ash-colored face, and served to cover a deep scar on

the lower lip, the memento of a duel fought in behalf of a certain

frail fair one.

He was an exceedingly popular alcalde; there was nothing staid or

sombre in his method of administering justice. The law was less to

him than expediency, and his standard of right was easily shifted,

according to circumstances. In wit and vivacity he was a Mercutio.

Astute of intellect, discreet, of a cheerful, even jovial disposition,

with brilliant intuitions and effervescent animal spirits, he knew

how to please, how to treat every man as best he liked to be treated.

A cavalier of the Ojeda and Balboa type, he was superior to either.

He would not, like the former, woo danger for the mere pleasure of

it, nor, like the latter, tamely trust his forfeited head to any

governor. Life was of value to him; yet adventure was the rhythm of

it, and the greater the peril the greater the harmony secured. An

hidalgo of respectable antecedents, whatever he might have been,

or might be, he now played the part of magistrate to perfection.

As a matter of course, he was in entire sympathy with the religious

views of the day, as well as with the leading men among the clergy.

Indeed the friars ever praised him, believing him to be a zealous and

conscientious man; he made it a point that they should. The moral

ideal of the Japanese is politeness. Politeness is virtue. They do

not say that lying and stealing are wrong, but impolite. While the

alcalde if pressed must confess himself an optimist, believing that

whatever is, is best, yet in practice that best he would better, and

whatsoever his strength permitted, it was right for him to do. He was

a sort of Mephistopheles, decked in manners and guided by knowledge.

Besides the world, he knew books, and how to make somewhat of them.

Earnestly devoted to the service of the church, many of his acts yet

met with its most unqualified condemnation. Possessed of vehement

aspirations, his ambition was of the aggressive kind; not like that

of Velazquez, mercenary and timid. Like Tigellinus Sophonius, it was

to his pleasing person and unscrupulous character that the alcalde

owed his rise from poverty and obscurity; and now, like Phaethon,

if for one day he might drive the governor’s sun-chariot across the

heavens, it would be his own fault if he were not a made man. This

much at this time we may say of Hernan[52] Cortés, for such was the

alcalde’s name; which is more than he could say for himself, not

knowing himself as we know him, and more than his associates could say

of him. Hereafter as his character develops we shall become further

acquainted with him. It is as difficult to detect the full-grown

plant in a seed as in a stone, and yet the seed will become a great

tree, while the stone remains a stone.

And so, with the aid of his loving friends Duero and Láres, whose

deft advice worked successfully on the plastic mind of Velazquez, and

because he possessed some money and many friends, as well as courage

and wisdom, the alcalde of Santiago was proclaimed captain-general of

the expedition.[53] And now, while the heathen wail let the Spaniards

rejoice. Yes. Noble Castilian! cry aloud! for gold shall fill the

coffers of your king as they were never filled before, and great

shall be the glory of your kingdom; and if the sight of the blood

your captains shall draw from the hapless savages, even more freely

than gold is drawn, does not spoil your appetite for the game, then

whet your swords for the grand pacification.

FOOTNOTES

[37] Herrera says it was the _San Sebastian_; Oviedo, the

_Trinidad_.

[38] Town and river given both by Cortés and Orontius. Colon

writes _R: de almeria_; Ribero, _almera_; Vaz Dourado,

_allmeira_; Hood, _Almeria_; nos. vi. and vii., _Munich

Atlas_, _rio de almeria_, and Mercator, _Almeria_. Ogilby

places north of _Lhanos de Almeria_ a large gulf labelled

_R. de S Pº y S Paulo_, and south of it _Toluia_, and _Tore

Branco_. Dampier lays down _Almeria I._ opposite _Tispe_

and _Haniago Isle_ on the mainland. Laet gives _Naothlan

ó Almeria_, and _Lhanos de Almeria_.

[39] ‘Vimos las sierras de Tusta, y mas adelante de a hi á

otros dos dias vimos otros sierras muy altas, q̄ agora se

llamã las sierras de Tuspa;’ so called, Bernal Diaz says,

_Hist. Verdad._, 10, from the towns lying at their base.

The Rio de Tuxpan is supposed to be the _San Pedro y San

Pablo_ of early days. ‘Da das Peter-und-Pauls-Fest auf den

29 Juni.’

[40] Kohl thinks Grijalva did not pass Cabo Rojo, the

_C:. roxo_ of Vaz Dourado, and Hood, and I am inclined to

agree with him. Bernal Diaz says, _Hist. Verdad._, 10, ‘Y

esto es ya en la Provincia de Panuco: é yendo por nuestra

nauegaciõ llegamos á vn rio grande, que le pusimos por nõbre

Rio de Canoas.’ The nomenclature of this stream is quite

regular in the several times and places. Cortés gives _Rio

Panuco loaton_; Colon, _R: panuco_; Ribero and Vaz Dourado,

_panuco_; Orontius, _R. panico_; Hood, _Panuço_; Baptista

Agnese, _panucho_, and _rio panucho_; no. vi. _Munich

Atlas_ the same; Ptolemy, 1530, in _Munster_, _Panuco_;

Mercator, river and town _Panuco_, and next town south

_Chila_. And so on with Hondius, Ogilby, Dampier, and the

rest. See _Goldschmidt’s Cartog. Pac. Coast_, MS., i. 578.

Upon the hypothesis that the San Pedro y San Pablo and the

Tuxpan were two streams, the latter may have been the Rio

de Canoas of Grijalva and the Pánuco discovered by Montejo

and Alaminos the year following, as Kohl surmises, but not

otherwise. Herrera says the expedition did not pass Cabo

Rojo; Bernal Diaz speaks of a wide projecting cape, which

does not exist beyond the Pánuco River. Yet both affirm

that the province of Pánuco was reached, and we well know

that little would be said to strangers of an aboriginal

province by its inhabitants before its great town, or its

great river, was approached. Hence the general impression

that Grijalva on this occasion coasted as far as Tampico,

and that the Pánuco was his Rio de Canoas. It is my opinion

that the entrance to the Bahia de Tanguijo, mistaken for

a river, was the Rio de Canoas of Grijalva, and that Cabo

Rojo was his ultimate point of discovery.

[41] Some say sixteen.

[42] In questo giorno sul tardi vedessemo miracolo ben grande

el qual fu che apparve una stella incima la nave dapoi el

tramontar del sole et partisse sempre buttando razi fino che

se pose sopra quel vilagio over populo grande et lasso uno

razo ne laiere che duro piu de tre hore grande et anchora

vedessimo altri signal ben chiari dove comprendessemo che

dio volea per suo servitio populassemo la dicta terra.

_Itinerario_, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, i. 302.

[43] Bernal Diaz claims to have planted here the first

orange-seeds sown in New Spain. It was at the base of a

temple, on whose summit he had enjoyed a refreshing sleep,

above the clouds of mosquitoes, and through gratitude

he sowed these seed, which he had brought from Cuba. He

tells, likewise, of obtaining here by barter 4,000 pesos,

which, with the 16,000 pesos Alvarado carried home, made

20,000 pesos secured during the voyage. Among the treasures

were some copper hatchets, which the Spaniards took to

be an inferior kind of gold. Las Casas gives a detailed

description of the treasures obtained by this expedition,

among which was an emerald worth 2,000 ducats, from the

mainland opposite Isla de Sacrificios.

[44] This, following Oviedo, who in 1523 visited Velazquez,

and was told these things. Other authors give widely

different accounts of Grijalva’s return, most of them

taking him at once from Tonalá to Matanzas, but allowing

forty days for the voyage. Oviedo dates Grijalva’s arrival

at the River Goazacoalco July 9; at Deseado, August 17;

at Champoton, September 1; San Lázaro, September 5, and

Matanzas, October 8, which is too early, according to the

date of Cortés’ instructions.

[45] Oviedo says that Olid went to Cozumel and took

possession of the island, thinking he had discovered it;

then coasting north and westward to a port, Laguna de

Términos, and finding no traces of Grijalva, and having

lost his anchors, he returned to Matanzas eight days before

Grijalva; but in this statement he is sustained neither by

his contemporaries nor by his own collateral statements.

Velazquez’ instructions to Cortés are dated the 23d of

October, at which time neither Olid nor Grijalva had

returned, since Cortés is told to search for them; both

arrived, however, before he sailed.

[46] It was in May, 1519, according to Oviedo, that Benito

Martin—some call him Martinez—sailed for Spain, Grijalva

having arrived at Santiago late in the October previous.

By reference to a Velazquez memorial, in iv. 233-4, _Col.

Doc. Inéd._, we find that before this, upon the strength

of Córdoba’s discovery, the king, on the 13th of November,

1518, at Saragossa, made Velazquez adelantado of what he

had discovered, or might discover. Thus far he claimed as

having found, at his own cost, Cozumel and Yucatan, the Santa

María de los Remedios of the Spaniards, which was not true.

Indeed, these memorials of the descendants of conquerors

are, as a rule, widely different from the facts; instance

this one again, which gives Olid seventy men instead of

seven. As a matter of course, the honor of the discovery is

claimed wholly for the governor of Cuba, to the prejudice

of others who ventured more than he. See _Carta del Ayunt.

de Vera Cruz_, in _Col. Doc. Inéd._, i. 418-9. Instance

further a _Memorial del negocio de D. Antonio Velazquez de

Basan_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, x. 80-6,

in which Grijalva is given five ships and a year and a half,

and Olid three ships and seventy men. In the _Instruccion

que dió el adelantado Diego Velazquez á Hernan Cortés_,

in _Col. Doc. Inéd._, xii. 226-46, the little boat of Olid

has grown into a caravel with 80 or 90 men.

[47] Las Casas saw him at Santo Domingo in 1523. He was

reduced to penury. Proceeding thence to Panamá, he was

sent by Pedrarias to Nicaragua, where he was killed. So

perished the best and morally bravest of cavaliers, while

unscrupulous tricksters flourished. Prior to his departure

from Cuba, however, and notwithstanding the vile treatment

of the governor, at Velazquez’ request, Grijalva wrote a

narrative of his expedition, which was lost by Oviedo in

its transmission to the king. It is embodied, however, in

substance, in _Oviedo_, i. 502-37. One of the most original

and complete accounts of Grijalva’s expedition extant is

that by the priest Juan Diaz, _Itinerario de Larmata del

Re Catholico in India verso la Isola de Iuchathan del anno

M. D. XVIII, alla qual fu Presidente & Capitan Generale

Ioan de Grisalva; el qual e facto per el capellano maggior

de dicta Armata a sua Altezza_, published in Italian, at

Venice, in 1520, in French by Ternaux-Compans, in 1838, the

former being copied and quoted in manuscript by Prescott. The

issue at Venice was as the second part of the _Itinerario de

Ludovico de varthema Bolognese nello Egitto, nella Soria_,

etc., and was there begun, _Qui comincia lo Itinerario de

Lisola de Iuchatan nouamente ritrouata per il signor Gioan

de Grisalue_, etc. By far the best edition is that given

with a Spanish translation by Icazbalceta, in his _Col.

Doc._, i. 281-308, printed in Mexico in 1858. Next is the

account by Bernal Diaz, who, like the chaplain, accompanied

the expedition, thus giving us narratives by eye-witnesses

at once from ecclesiastical and secular stand-points. The

statements of Gomara, _Hist. Ind._, 56-8, and _Hist. Mex._, 9-11,

must be taken with allowance. Worse still are the memorials

of the relatives of Velazquez to sovereign majesty, such

as that found in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, x.

80-6, which are little better than tissues of misstatements

and exaggerations. Solis, _Hist. Mex._, i. 24-40, gives

a fair, full, and graphic statement of particulars. The

_Instruccion que dió el adelantado Diego Velazquez á Hernan

Cortés_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xii.

226-51, also important, as furnishing original collateral

light. Las Casas, _Hist. Ind._, iv. 16, 421-4, though full,

is specially inaccurate and weak, not only in his facts,

but in his deductions. Nor is Peter Martyr, dec. iv. cap.

iii., any stronger. _Clavigero_, _Storia Mess._, iii. 4-6,

_De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii_, in _Icazbalceta_,

_Col. Doc._, i. 341-6, and _Landa_, _Rel. de Yuc._, 21,

are mediocre; and _Herrera_, dec. ii. lib. iii. cap. i.

and ix., is quite full and very valuable. Cogolludo, _Hist.

Yucathan_, 8-16, gives a fair résumé, but a far better one

is Torquemada’s, i. 351-7. Prescott’s account, _Mex._, i.

224-9, is meagre and imperfect, though his deductions are

much more sound than those of Robertson’s _Hist. Am._, i.

240-3. One of the most superficial of the modern narratives

of this expedition is given by Zamacois, _Hist. Méj._,

ii. 236-52. Those by Morelet, _Voy. dans l’Am. Cent._, i.

179-85, and Fancourt’s _Hist. Yuc._, 9-18, are valuable. A

collection of extracts from several letters to Charles V.,

referring to Yucatan, and forming ‘an account of a recently

discovered island, describing its locality, the customs

and habits of its inhabitants,’ was printed at Nuremberg,

by Frederick Peypus, in 1520, under title beginning _Ein

auszug ettlicher sendbrieff dem aller durchleüchtigisten_.

Carbajal Espinosa, _Hist. Mex._, i. 51-65, ii. 21, and

Ramirez, in his Mexican edition of Prescott, i. 132 and 135,

beside narratives, give portraits of Velazquez, Córdoba, and

Grijalva. _Sahagun_, _Hist. Conq._, 9-13, and _Brasseur de

Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, iv. 27-50, are most valuable

from an aboriginal stand-point. Alaman, in his _Disert._,

i. 49-91, treats of both Córdoba’s and Grijalva’s voyages.

Among the many allusions to these two expeditions of no

special significance are those found in _Ogilby’s Am._, 76-8;

_Purchas, His Pilgrimes_, v. 858; _Oveido_, _Sommario_,

in _Ramusio_, _Viaggi_, iii. 182-9; _Soc. Mex. Geog._,

_Boletin_, iii. 242-3; _Robertson’s Visit Mex._, i. 143;

_Voy., Cur. and Ent._, 471-9; _World Displayed_, i. 166-79;

_Voy., A New Col._, i. 189-98; _Sammlung aller Reisebesch._,

xiii. 254-64; _Laharpe_, _Abrégé_, ix. 219-31; _Kerr’s

Voy._, ii. 70-1, and iii. 416-53; _Klemm_, _Allgemeine

Cultur-Geschichte_, 219; _Cordua_, _Scheeps-Togt_, 3-18, and

35-89, in _Aa_, _Naaukeurige Versameling, Montanus, Nieuwe

Weereld_, 72-5; _Gottfried_, _Reysen_, iii.; _Folsom_,

in _Cortés’ Despatches_, 6-8; _Howitt’s Hist. U. S._, i.

8-9; _Lardner’s Hist. Discov._, ii. 43-4; _Span. Conq. in

Am._, ii. 3-9; _Vetancvrt_, _Teatro Mex._, pt. iii., 106-9;

_Larenaudière_, _Mex. et Guat._, 53-4; _Calle_, _Mem. y

Not._, 81-2; _Mayer’s Mex. Aztec_, i. 14-15; _Hassel_,

_Mex. Guat._, 6; _Holmes’ An. Am._, i. 35-7; _Galvano’s

Discov._, 130-2; _Corradi_, _Descub. de la Am._, ii. 7-19;

_Dalton’s Conq. Mex. and Peru_, 47-9; _Span. Emp. in Am._,

27-8; _Snowden’s Am._, 77-9; _Raynal_, _Hist. Phil._, iii.

246-7; _Descripcion de Am._, MS., 112-13; _Gordon’s Hist.

Am._, 112-13; _Malte-Brun_, _Yucatan_, 23-4; _Wilson’s Conq.

Mex._, 291; _Castellanos_, _Varones ilustres de Indias_, 71;

_Peter Martyr_, dec. iv., cap. i.-v., _Dufey_, _Résumé_, i.

97-103; _Mavor’s Hist._, xxiv. 65-6; _Gregory’s Hist. Mex._,

19-20; _Norman’s Rambles_, 95; _Wilson’s Mex. and Reg._,

18; _Colton’s Jour. Geog._, No. vi. 84; _Newe Zeittung von

Jucatan_, 1, etc.; _Monglave_, _Résumé_, 41-6; _March y

Labores_, _Marina Española_, i. 463-4; _Cortesii_, _von dem

Newen Hisp._, pt. ii. 2-5; _Morelli_, _Fasti Novi Orbis_,

16; _Armin_, _Alte Mex._, 77-8; _Touron_, _Hist. Gen. Am._,

iii. 58-78; _Bussierre_, _l’Empire Mex._, 193-9; _Sandoval_,

_Hist. Carlos V._, i. 161-2; _Cortés_, _Hist. Mex._, 30-110;

_Campe_, _Hist. Descub. Am._, ii. 7-19; _Cortés_, _Aven. y

Conq._, 12-13; _Stephens’ Incid. of Travel in Yuc._, ii.

366-9; _Drake’s Voy._, 161-3; _Hart’s Tabasco_, 4-5; _La

Cruz_, v. 541-4; _Nouvelles An. des Voy._, xcvii. 30-1,

and clxiv. 101; and _Manzi_, _Conq. di Mess._, 1-3.

[48] Called Borrego, says Torquemada, i. 361. Bernal Diaz

gives Borrego as the second surname.

[49] Bernal Diaz says Augustin Bermudez.

[50] Las Casas regarded him as a schemer, and often warned

Velazquez against ‘Veintidos años de Italia.’ _Hist. Ind._,

iv. 447. He calls him likewise ‘Burgalés’ and ‘hombre

astutísimo.’

[51] ‘Que partirian,’ says Bernal Diaz, _Hist. Verdad._, 13,

‘entre todos tres la ganancia del oro, y plata, y joyas,

de la parte que le cupiesse á Cortés,’ and also, growls

Las Casas, _ubi supra_—knowledge of the facts as yet being

but rumor—what Cortés could steal from the king and the

governor was subject to division, beside what he would rob

from the natives.

[52] Hernan, Hernando, Fernan, Fernando, Ferdinando. The

names are one. With no special preference, I employ the

first, used by the best writers. Among the early authorities,

Solis, the Spanish translator of _De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi

Cortesii_, and many others, write Hernan; Pizarro y Orellana,

_Varones Ilvstres_, Fernan; Bernal Diaz and Oviedo, Hernando;

Gomara, Fernando. In accordance with the Spanish usage of adding

the mother’s surname, he is sometimes, though rarely, called

Cortés y Pizarro. For portrait and signature I refer the

reader to _Alaman_, _Disert._, i. app. i. 15-16; portrait

as an old man; _Clavigero_, _Storia Mess._, iii. 6-8;

_Prescott’s Mex._, iii. 1; _Id._, (ed. Mex., 1846, iii.

210-11); _Armin_, _Alte Mex._, 82, plate from the painting

in the Concepcion Hospital at Mexico; _March y Labores_,

_Marina Española_, i. 466.

[53] In making out the commission Duero stretched every

point in favor of his friend, naming him captain-general

of lands discovered and to be discovered, as well as of

the fleet. _Solis_, _Hist. Mex._, i. 47; for the greater

the share of Cortés, the greater Duero’s share. Gomara says,

_Hist. Mex._, 12, ‘Hablo a Fernâdo Cortés para q̄ armassen

ambos a medias, porq̄ tenia dos mil Castellanos de oro,’

etc.; but 2000 castellanos alone would not purchase a half

interest in this undertaking. Las Casas, loc. cit., states

that Velazquez, for reasons that will appear in the next

chapter, was very cautious in intercourse with Cortés until

his scruples were overcome by advisers.

History of Mexico, Volume 1, 1516-1521 · 第 3 / 34 章