CHAPTER XXVIII

THE CYCLOSTOMES, OR LAMPREYS

=The Lampreys.=--Passing upward from the lancelets and setting aside

the descending series of Tunicates, we have a long step indeed to the

next class of fish-like vertebrates. During the period this great gap

represents in time we have the development of brain, skull, heart, and

other differentiated organs replacing the simple structures found in

the lancelet.

The presence of brain without limbs and without coat-of-mail

distinguishes the class of _Cyclostomes_, or lampreys (~kuklos~,

round; ~stoma~, mouth). This group is also known as _Marsipobranchi_

(~marsipion~, pouch; ~branchos~, gill); _Dermopteri_ (~derma~, skin;

~pteron~, fin); and _Myzontes_ (~myzaô~, to suck). It includes the

forms known as lampreys, slime-eels, and hagfishes.

=Structure of the Lamprey.=--Comparing a Cyclostome with a lancelet we

may see many evidences of specialization in structure. The Cyclostome

has a distinct head with a cranium formed of a continuous body of

cartilage modified to contain a fish-like brain, a cartilaginous

skeleton of which the cranium is evidently a differentiated part.

The vertebræ are undeveloped, the notochord being surrounded by its

membranes, without bony or cartilaginous segments. The gills have the

form of fixed sacs, six to fourteen in number, on each side, arranged

in a cartilaginous structure known as "branchial basket" (fig. 289_a_),

the elements of which are not clearly homologous with the gill-arches

of the true fishes. Fish-like eyes are developed on the sides of the

head. There is a median nostril associated with a pituitary pouch,

which pierces the skull floor. An ear-capsule is developed. The brain

is composed of paired ganglia in general appearance resembling the

brain of the true fish, but the detailed homology of its different

parts offers considerable uncertainty. The heart is modified to form

two pulsating cavities, auricle and ventricle. The folds of the dorsal

and anal fins are distinct, supported by slender rays.

The mouth is a roundish disk, with rasping teeth over its surface

and with sharper and stronger teeth on the tongue. The intestine is

straight and simple. The kidney is represented by a highly primitive

pronephros and no trace exists of an air-bladder or lung. The skin is

smooth and naked, sometimes secreting an excessive quantity of slime.

From the true fishes the Cyclostomes differ in the total absence of

limbs and of shoulder and pelvic girdles, as well as of jaws. It has

been thought by some writers that the limbs were ancestrally present

and lost through degeneration, as in the eels. Dr. Ayers, following

Huxley, finds evidence of the ancestral existence of a lower jaw. The

majority of observers, however, regard the absence of limbs and jaws in

Cyclostomes as a primitive character, although numerous other features

of the modern hagfish and lamprey may have resulted from degeneration.

There is no clear evidence that the class of Cyclostomes, as now known

to us, has any great antiquity, and its members may be all degenerate

offshoots from types of greater complexity of structure.

=Supposed Extinct Cyclostomes.=--No species belonging to the class

of Cyclostomes has been found fossil. We may reason theoretically

that the earliest fish-like forms were acraniate or lancelet-like,

and that lamprey-like forms would naturally follow these, but this

view cannot be substantiated from the fossils. Lancelets have no hard

parts whatever, and could probably leave no trace in any sedimentary

deposit. The lampreys stand between lancelets and sharks. Their teeth

and fins at least might occasionally be preserved in the rocks, but

no structures certainly known to be such have yet been recognized. It

is however reasonably certain that the modern lamprey and hagfish are

descendants, doubtless degraded and otherwise modified from species

which filled the gap between the earliest chordate animals and the

jaw-bearing sharks.

=Conodontes.=--Certain structures found as fossils have been from time

to time regarded as Cyclostomes, but in all such cases there is doubt

as to the real nature of the fossil relic in question or as to the

proper interpretation of its relationship.

Thus the _Conodontes_ of the Cambrian, Silurian, and Devonian have

been regarded as lingual teeth of extinct Cyclostomes. The _Cycliæ_

of the Devonian have been considered as minute lampreys, although the

vertebral segments are highly specialized, to a degree far beyond the

condition seen in the lampreys of to-day. The Ostracophores have been

regarded as monstrous lampreys in coat of mail, and the possibility of

a lamprey origin even for Arthrodires has been suggested. The _Cycliæ_

and _Ostracophori_ were apparently without jaws or limbs, being in this

regard like the _Cyclostomes_, but their ancestry and relationships are

wholly problematical.

[Illustration: FIG. 290.--_Polygnathus dubium_ Hinde. A Conodont from

the New York Devonian. (After Hinde.)]

The nature of the Conodontes is still uncertain. In form they resemble

teeth, but their structure is different from that of the teeth of any

fishes, agreeing with that of the teeth of annelid worms. Some have

compared them to the armature of Trilobites. Some fifteen nominal

genera are described by Pander in Russia, and by Hinde about Lake

Erie and Lake Ontario. Some of these, as _Drepaniodus_, are simple,

straight or curved grooved teeth or tooth-like structures; others, as

_Prioniodus_, have numerous smaller teeth or denticles at the base of

the larger one.

=Orders of Cyclostomes.=--The known Cyclostomes are naturally

divided into two orders, the _Hyperotreta_, or hagfishes, and the

_Hyperoartia_, or lampreys. These two orders are very distinct from

each other. While the two groups agree in the general form of the body,

they differ in almost every detail, and there is much pertinence in

Lankester's suggestions that each should stand as a separate class. The

ancestral forms of each, as well as the intervening types if such ever

existed, are left unrecorded in the rocks.

=The Hyperotreta, or Hagfishes.=--The _Hyperotreta_ (~hyperôa~,

palate; ~tretos~, perforate), or hagfishes, have the nostril highly

developed, a tube-like cylinder with cartilaginous rings penetrating

the palate. In these the eyes are little developed and the species are

parasitic on other fishes. In _Polistotrema stouti_, the hagfish of

the coast of California, is parasitic on large fishes, rockfishes, or

flounders. It usually fastens itself at the throat or isthmus of its

host and sometimes at the eyes. Thence it works very rapidly to the

inside of the body. It there devours all the muscular part of the fish

without breaking the skin or the peritoneum, leaving the fish a living

hulk of head, skin, and bones. It is especially destructive to fishes

taken in gill-nets. The voracity of the Chilean species _Polistotrema

dombeyi_ is equally remarkable. Dr. Federico T. Delfin finds that

in seven hours a hagfish of this species will devour eighteen times

its own weight of fish-flesh. The intestinal canal is a simple tube,

through which most of the food passes undigested. The eggs are large,

each in a yellowish horny case, at one end of which are barbed threads

by which they cling together and to kelp or other objects. In the

California hagfish, _Polistotrema stouti_, great numbers of these eggs

have been found in the stomachs of the males.

[Illustration: FIG. 291.--California Hagfish, _Polistotrema stouti_

Lockington.]

Similar habits are possessed by all the species in the two families,

_Myxinidæ_ and _Eptatretidæ_. In the _Myxinidæ_ the gill-openings

are apparently single on each side, the six gills being internal and

leading by six separate ducts to each of the six branchial sacs. The

skin is excessively slimy, the extensible tongue is armed with two

cone-like series of strong teeth. About the mouth are eight barbels.

Of _Myxine_, numerous species are known--_Myxine glutinosa_, in the

north of Europe; _Myxine limosa_, of the West Atlantic; _Myxine

australis_, and several others about Cape Horn, and _Myxine garmani_

in Japan. All live in deep waters and none have been fully studied. It

has been claimed that the hagfish is male when young, many individuals

gradually changing to female, but this conclusion lacks verification

and is doubtless without foundation.

In the _Eptatretidæ_ the gill-openings, six to fourteen in number, are

externally separate, each with its own branchial sac as in the lampreys.

The species of the genus _Eptatretus_ (_Bdellostoma_, _Heptatrema_,

and _Homea_, all later names for the same group) are found only in the

Pacific, in California, Chile, Patagonia, South Africa, and Japan. In

general appearance and habits these agree with the species of _Myxine_.

The species with ten to fourteen gill-openings (_dombeyi_: _stouti_)

are sometimes set off as a distinct genus (_Polistotrema_), but in

other regards the species differ little, and frequent individual

variations occur. _Eptatretus burgeri_ is found in Japan and

_Eptatretus forsteri_ in Australia.

=The Hyperoartia, or Lampreys.=--In the order _Hyperoartia_, or

lampreys, the single nostril is a blind sac which does not penetrate

the palate. The seven gill-openings lead each to a separate sac, the

skin is not especially covered with mucus, the eyes are well developed

in the adult, and the mouth is a round disk armed with rasp-like

teeth, the comb-like teeth on the tongue being less developed than

in the hagfishes. The intestine in the lampreys has a spiral valve.

The eggs are small and are usually laid in brooks away from the sea,

and in most cases the adult lamprey dies after spawning. According to

Thoreau, "it is thought by fishermen that they never return, but waste

away and die, clinging to rocks and stumps of trees for an indefinite

period, a tragic feature in the scenery of the river-bottoms worthy to

be remembered with Shakespeare's description of the sea-floor." This

account is not far from the truth, as recent studies have shown.

The lampreys of the northern regions constitute the family of

_Petromyzonidæ_. The larger species (_Petromyzon_, _Entosphenus_) live

in the sea, ascending rivers to spawn, and often becoming land-locked

and reduced in size by living in rivers only. Such land-locked marine

lampreys (_Petromyzon marinus unicolor_) breed in Cayuga Lake and

other lakes in New York. The marine forms reach a length of three

feet. Smaller lampreys of other genera six inches to eighteen inches

in length remain all their lives in the rivers, ascending the little

brooks in the spring, clinging to stones and clods of earth till

their eggs are deposited. These are found throughout northern Europe,

northern Asia, and the colder parts of North America, belonging to the

genera _Lampetra_ and _Ichthyomyzon_. Other and more aberrant genera

from Chile and Australia are _Geotria_ and _Mordacia_, the latter

forming a distinct family, _Mordaciidæ_. In _Geotria_, a large and

peculiar gular pouch is developed at the throat. In _Macrophthalmia_

_chilensis_ from Chile the eyes are large and conspicuous.

=Food of Lampreys.=--The lampreys feed on the blood and flesh of

fishes. They attach themselves to the sides of the various species,

rasp off the flesh with their teeth, sucking the blood till the fish

weakens and dies. Preparations made by students of Professor Jacob

Reighard in the University of Michigan show clearly that the lamprey

stomach contains muscular tissue as well as the blood of fishes. The

river species do a great deal of mischief, a fact which has been the

subject of a valuable investigation by Professor H. A. Surface, who has

also considered the methods available for their destruction. The flesh

of the lamprey is wholesome, and the larger species, especially the

great sea lamprey of the Atlantic, _Petromyzon marinus_, are valued as

food. The small species, according to Prof. Gage, never feed on fishes.

[Illustration: FIG. 292.--Lamprey, _Petromyzon marinus_ L. Woods Hole,

Mass.]

=Metamorphosis of Lampreys.=--All lampreys, so far as known, pass

through a distinct metamorphosis. The young, known as the _Ammocoetes_

form, are slender, eyeless, and with the mouth narrow and toothless.

From Professor Surface's paper on "The Removal of Lampreys from the

Interior Waters of New York" we have the following extracts (slightly

condensed):

[Illustration: FIG. 293.--_Petromyzon marinus unicolor_ (De Kay). Mouth

of Lake Lamprey, Cayuga Lake. (After Gage.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 294.--_Lampetra wilderi_ Jordan & Evermann. Larval

Brook Lamprey in its burrow in a glass filled with sand. (After Gage.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 295.--_Lampetra wilderi_ Jordan & Evermann. Mouth

of Brook Lamprey. Cayuga Lake. (After Gage.)]

"In the latter part of the fall the young lampreys, _Petromyzon marinus

unicolor_, the variety land-locked in the lakes of Central New York,

metamorphose and assume the form of the adult. They are now about six

or eight inches long. The externally segmented condition of the body

disappears. The eyes appear to grow out through the skin and become

plainly visible and functional. The mouth is no longer filled with

vertical membranous sheets to act as a sieve, but it contains nearly

one hundred and fifty sharp and chitinous teeth, arranged in rows

that are more or less concentric and at the same time presenting the

appearance of circular radiation. These teeth are very strong, with

sharp points, and in structure each has the appearance of a hollow

cone of chitin placed over another cone or papilla. A little below the

center of the mouth is the oral opening, which is circular and contains

a flattened tongue which bears finer teeth of chitin set closely

together and arranged in two interrupted (appearing as four) curved

rows extending up and down from the ventral toward the dorsal side

of the mouth. Around the mouth is a circle of soft membrane finally

surrounded by a margin of fimbriæ or small fringe. This completes the

apparatus with which the lamprey attaches itself to its victims, takes

its food, carries stones, builds and tears down its nest, seizes its

mate, holds itself in position in a strong current, and climbs over

falls."

=Mischief Done by Lampreys.=--"The most common economic feature in

the entire life history of these animals is their feeding habits in

this (spawning) stage, their food now consisting wholly of the blood

(and flesh) of fishes. A lamprey is able to strike its suctorial mouth

against a fish, and in an instant becomes so firmly attached that it

is very rarely indeed that the efforts of the fish will avail to rid

itself of its persecutor. When a lamprey attaches itself to a person's

hand in the aquarium, it can only be freed by lifting it from the

water. As a rule it will drop the instant it is exposed to the open

air, although often it will remain attached for some time even in the

open air, or may attach itself to an object while out of water.

"Nearly all lampreys that are attached to fish when they are caught

in nets will escape through the meshes of the nets, but some are

occasionally brought ashore and may hang on to their victim with

bulldog pertinacity.

"The fishes that are mostly attacked are of the soft-rayed species,

having cycloid scales, the spiny-rayed species with ctenoid scales

being most nearly immune from their attacks. We think there may be

three reasons for this: 1st, the fishes of the latter group are

generally more alert and more active than those of the former, and may

be able more readily to dart away from such enemies; 2d, their scales

are thicker and stronger and appear to be more firmly imbedded in the

skin, consequently it is more difficult for the lampreys to hold on and

cut through the heavier coat-of-mail to obtain the blood of the victim;

3d, since the fishes of the second group are wholly carnivorous and in

fact almost exclusively fish-eating when adult, in every body of water

they are more rare than those of the first group, which are more nearly

omnivorous. According to the laws and requirements of nature the fishes

of the first group must be more abundant, as they become the food for

those of the second, and it is on account of their greater abundance

that the lampreys' attacks on them are more observed.

"There is no doubt that the bullhead, or horned pout (_Ameiurus

nebulosus_), is by far the greatest sufferer from lamprey attacks in

Cayuga Lake. This may be due in part to the sluggish habits of the

fish, which render it an easy victim, but it is more likely due to

the fact that this fish has no scales and the lamprey has nothing to

do but to pierce the thick skin and find its feast of blood ready for

it. There is no doubt of the excellency of the bullhead as a food-fish

and of its increasing favor with mankind. It is at present the most

important food- and market-fish of the State (New York), being caught

by bushels in the early part of June when preparing to spawn. As we

have observed at times more than ninety per cent. of the catch attacked

by lampreys, it can readily be seen how very serious are the attacks

of this terrible parasite which is surely devastating our lakes and

streams."

=Migration or "Running" of Lampreys.=--"After thus feeding to an

unusual extent, their reproductive elements (gonads) become mature

and their alimentary canals commence to atrophy. This duct finally

becomes so occluded that from formerly being large enough to admit a

lead-pencil of average size when forced through it, later not even

liquids can pass through, and it becomes nearly a thread closely

surrounded by the crowding reproductive organs. When these changes

commence to ensue, the lampreys turn their heads against the current

and set out on their long journeys to the sites that are favorable for

spawning, which here may be from two to eight miles from the lake. In

this migration they are true to their instincts and habits of laziness

in being carried about, as they make use of any available object, such

as a fish, boat, etc., that is going in their direction, fastening to

it with their suctorial mouths and being borne along at their ease.

During this season it is not infrequent that as the Cornell crews

come in from practice and lift their shells from the water, they find

lampreys clinging to the bottoms of the boats, sometimes as many as

fifty at one time. They are likely to crowd up all streams flowing

into the lake, inspecting the bed of the stream as they go. They do

not stop until they reach favorable spawning sites, and if they find

unsurmountable obstacles in their way, such as vertical falls or dams,

they turn around and go down-stream until they find another, up which

they go. This is proved every spring by the number of adult lampreys

which are seen temporarily in Pall Creek and Cascadilla Creek. In each

of these streams, about a mile from its mouth, there is a vertical fall

over thirty feet in height which the lampreys cannot surmount, and in

fact they have never been seen attempting to do so. After clinging with

their mouths to the stones at the foot of the falls for a few days,

they work their way down-stream, carefully inspecting all the bottom

for suitable spawning sites. They do not spawn in these streams because

there are too many rocks and no sand, but finally enter the only stream

(the Cayuga Lake inlet) in which they find suitable and accessible

spawning sites.

[Illustration: FIG. 296.--Kamchatka Lamprey, _Lampetra camtschatica_

(Tilesius). Kamchatka.]

"The three-toothed lampreys (_Entosphenus tridentatus_) of the West

Coast climb low falls or rapids by a series of leaps, holding with

their mouths to rest, then jumping and striking again and holding, thus

leap by leap gaining the entire distance.

"The lampreys here have never been known to show any tendency or

ability to climb, probably because there are no rapids or mere low

falls in the streams up which they would run. In fact, as the inlet

is the only stream entering Cayuga Lake in this region which presents

suitable spawning conditions and no obstructions, it can be seen

at once that all the lampreys must spawn in this stream and its

tributaries.

[Illustration: FIG. 297.--Oregon Lamprey, _Entosphenus tridentatus_,

ascending a brook. (Modified from a photograph by Dr. H. M. Smith.

Published by Prof. H. A. Surface.) Willamette River, Oregon.]

"In 'running' they move almost entirely at night, and if they do not

reach a suitable spawning site by daylight, they will cling to roots

or stones during the day and complete their journey the next night.

This has been proven by the positive observation of individuals. Of

the specimens that run up early in the season, about four-fifths are

males. Thus the males do not exactly precede the females, because we

have found the latter sex represented in the stream as early in the

season as the former, but in the earlier part of the season the number

of the males certainly greatly predominates. This proportion of males

gradually decreases, until in the middle of the spawning season the

sexes are about equally represented, and toward the latter part of the

season the females continue to come until they in turn show the greater

numbers. Thus it appears very evident in general that the reproductive

instinct impels the most of the males to seek the spawning ground

before the most of the females do. However, it should be said that

neither the males nor the females show all of the entirely sexually

mature features when they first run up-stream in the beginning of the

season, but later they are perfectly mature and 'ripe' in every regard

when they first appear in the stream. When they migrate, they stop

at the site that seems to suit their fancy, many stopping near the

lake, others pushing on four or five miles farther up-stream. We have

noted, however, that later in the season the lower courses become more

crowded, showing that the late comers do not attempt to push up-stream

as far as those that came earlier. Also it thus follows, from what was

just said about late-running females, that in the latter part of the

season the lower spawning beds are especially crowded with females. In

fact, during the early part of the month of June we have found, not

more than half a mile above the lowest spawning bed, as many as five

females on a spawning nest with but one male; and in that immediate

vicinity many nests indeed were found at that time with two or three

females and but one male.

"Having arrived at a shoal which seems to present suitable conditions

for a spawning nest, the individual or pair commences at once to move

stones with its mouth from the centre to the margin of an area one or

two feet in diameter. When many stones are thus placed, especially

at the upper edge, and they are cleaned quite free of sediment and

algæ, both by being moved and by being fanned with the tail, and when

the proper condition of sand is found in the bottom of the basin thus

formed, it is ready to be used as a spawning bed or nest. A great

many nests are commenced and deserted. This has been left as a mystery

in publications on the subject, but we are well convinced that it is

because the lampreys do not find the requisites or proper conditions

of bottom (rocks, sand, etc., as given below) to supply all their

needs and fulfill all conditions for ideal sites. This desertion of

half-constructed nests is just what would be expected and anticipated

in connection with the explanation of 'Requisite Conditions for

Spawning,' given below, because some shallows contain more sand and

fewer stones, and others contain many larger stones but no sand, while

others contain pebbles lying over either rocks or sand. The lampreys

remove some of the material, and if they do not find all the essentials

for a spawning nest, the site is deserted and the creatures move on."

=Requisite Conditions for Spawning with Lampreys.=--"For a spawning

site two conditions are immediately essential--proper conditions of

water and suitable stream bed or bottom. Of course with these it is

essential that no impassable barriers (dam or falls) exist between

the lake and the spawning sites to prevent migration at the proper

'running' season. Lampreys will not spawn where there is no sand lying

on the bottom between the rocks, as sand is essential in covering the

eggs (see remarks on the 'Spawning Process'); neither will they spawn

where the bottom is all sand and small gravel, as they cannot take

hold of this material with their mouths to construct nests or to hold

themselves in the current, and they would not find here pebbles and

stones to carry over the nest while spawning, as described elsewhere.

It can thus be seen that, as suggested above, the reason they do not

spawn in Fall Creek and Cascadilla Creek, between the lake and the

falls, is that the beds of these streams are very rocky, being covered

only with large stones and no sand. There is no doubt that the lampreys

find here suitable conditions of water, but they do not remain to

spawn on account of the absence of the proper conditions of stream

bed. Again, they do not spawn in the lower course of the inlet for

a distance of nearly two miles from the lake, because near the lake

the bed of the stream is composed of silt, while for some distance

above this (up-stream) there is nothing but sand. Farther up-stream

are found pebbles and stones commingled with sand, which combination

satisfies the demands of the lampreys for material in constructing

nests and covering eggs. The accessibility of these sites, together

with their suitable conditions, render the inlet the great and perhaps

the only spawning stream of the lake; and, doubtless, all the mature

lampreys come here to spawn, excepting a few which spawn in the lower

part of Six-mile Creek, a tributary of the inlet.

"As the course of the stream where the beds abound is divided into

pools, separated by stony ripples or shallows, the nests must be made

at the ends of the pools. Of the spawning beds personally observed

during several seasons, nine-tenths of the entire number were formed

just above the shallows at the lower ends of the pools, while only a

few were placed below them. An advantage in forming the nest above the

shoals rather than below it is that in the former place the water runs

more swiftly over the lower and middle parts of such a bed than at its

upper margin, since the velocity decreases in either direction from the

steeper part of the shallows; and any organic material or sediment that

would wash over the upper edge of the nest is thus carried on rather

than left as a deposit. When formed below the shallows, owing to the

decreased velocity at the lower part of the nest compared with that

at the upper, the sediment is likely to settle in the hollow of the

nest, and, through the process of decay of the organic material, prove

disastrous or unfavorable for the developing embryos.

"The necessity of sand in the spawning bed indicates the explanation of

why we see so many shallows which have no spawning lampreys upon them,

while there are others in the same vicinity that are crowded. There

will be no nests formed if there is too little or too much sand, not

enough or too many stones, or stones that are all too small or all too

large. The stones must vary from the size of an egg to the size of a

man's hand, and must be intermingled with sand without mud or rubbish.

"The lampreys choose to make their spawning nests just where the water

flows so swiftly that it will carry the sand a short distance, but

will not sweep it out of the nest. This condition furnishes not only

force to wash the sand over the eggs when laid, but also keeps the

adult lampreys supplied with an abundance of fresh water containing the

dissolved air needed for their very rapid respiration. Of course in

such rapid water the eggs are likely to be carried away down-stream,

but Nature provides against this by the fact that they are adhesive,

and the mating lampreys stir up the sand with their tails, thus

weighing down the freshly laid eggs and holding them in the nest. Hence

the necessity of an abundance of sand at the spawning site."

=The Spawning Process with Lampreys.=--"There is much interest in the

study of the spawning process, as it is for the maintenance of the

race that the lampreys risk and end their lives; and as they are by

far the lowest form of vertebrates found within the United States,

a consideration of their actions and apparent evidences of instinct

becomes of unusual attraction. Let us consider one of those numerous

examples in which the male migrates before the female. When he comes

to that portion of the stream where the conditions named above are

favorable, he commences to form a nest by moving and clearing stones

and making a basin with a sandy bottom about the size of a common

wash-bowl. Several nests may be started and deserted before perfect

conditions are found for the completion of one. The male may be joined

by a female either before or after the nest is completed. There is

at once harmony in the family; but if another male should attempt to

intrude, either before or after the coming of the female, he is likely

to be summarily dealt with and dismissed at once by the first tenant.

As soon as the female arrives she too commences to move pebbles and

stones with her mouth.

"Sometimes the nest is made large enough to contain several pairs, or

often unequal numbers of males and females; or they may be constructed

so closely together as to form one continuous ditch across the

stream, just above the shallows. Many stones are left at the sides

and especially at the upper margin of the nest, and to these both

lampreys often cling for a few minutes as though to rest. While the

female is thus quiet, the male seizes her with his mouth at the back

of her head, clinging as to a fish. He presses his body as tightly as

possible against her side, and loops his tail over her near the vent

and down against the opposite side of her body so tightly that the

sand, accidentally coming between them, often wears the skin entirely

off of either or both at the place of closest contact. In most observed

instances the male pressed against the right side of the female,

although there is no unvarying rule as to position. The pressure of the

male thus aids to force the eggs from the body of the female, which

flow very easily when ripe. The vents of the two lampreys are thus

brought into close proximity, and the conspicuous genital papilla of

the male serves to guide the milt directly to the issuing spawn. There

appears to be no true intromission, although definite observation of

this feature is quite difficult, and, in fact, impossible. During the

time of actual pairing, which lasts but a few seconds, both members

of the pair exhibit tremendous excitement, shaking their bodies in

rapid vibrations and stirring up such a cloud of sand with their

tails that their eggs are at once concealed and covered. As the eggs

are adhesive and non-buoyant, the sand that is stirred up adheres to

them immediately and covers most of them before the school of minnows

in waiting just below the nest can dart through the water and regale

themselves upon the eggs of these enemies of their race; but woe to the

eggs that are not at once concealed. We would suggest that the function

of the characteristic anal fin, which is possessed only by the female,

and only at this time of year, may be to aid in this vastly important

process of stirring up the sand as the eggs are expelled; and the

explanation of the absence of such a fin from the ventral side of the

tail of the male may be found in the fact that it could not be used for

the same purpose at the instant when most needed, since the male is

just then using his tail as a clasping organ to give him an essential

position in pairing. As soon as they shake together they commence to

move stones from one part of the nest to another, to bring more loose

sand down over their eggs. They work at this from one to five minutes,

then shake again, thus making the intervals between mating from one to

five minutes, with a general average of about three and a half minutes.

"Although their work of moving stones does not appear to be systematic

in reference to the placing of the pebbles, or as viewed from the

standpoint of man, it does not need to be so in order to perfectly

fulfill all the purposes of the lampreys. As shown above in the remarks

on the spawning habits of the brook lampreys, the important end which

they thus accomplish is the loosening and shifting of the sand to cover

their eggs; and the more the stones are moved, even in the apparently

indiscriminate manner shown, the better is this purpose achieved. Yet,

in general, they ultimately accomplish the feat of moving to the lower

side of the nest all the stones they have placed or left at the upper

margin. At the close of the spawning season when the nest is seen with

no large pebbles at its upper margin, but quite a pile of stones below,

it can be known that the former occupants completed their spawning

process there; but if many small stones are left at the upper edge and

at the sides, and a large pile is not formed at the lower edge, it can

be known that the nest was forsaken or the lampreys removed before the

spawning process was completed. The stones they move are often twice

as heavy as themselves, and are sometimes even three or four times as

heavy. Since they are not attempting to build a stone wall of heavy

material, there is no occasion for their joining forces to remove

stones of extraordinary size, and they rarely do so, although once

during the past spring (1900) we saw two lake lampreys carrying the

same large stone down-stream across their nest. Although this place

was occupied by scores of brook lampreys, there were but three pairs

of lake lampreys seen here. It is true that one of these creatures

often moves the same stone several times, and many even attempt many

times to move a stone that has already been found too heavy for it; but

sooner or later the rock may become undermined so that the water will

aid them, and they have no way of knowing what they can do under such

circumstances until they try. Also, the repeated moving of one stone

may subserve the same purpose for the lamprey in covering its eggs with

sand as would the less frequent removal of many.

"When disturbed on the spawning nest, either of the pair will return

to the same nest if its mate is to be found there; but if its mate

is in another place, it will go to it, and if its mate is removed or

killed, it is likely to go to any part of the stream to another nest.

When disturbed, they often start up-stream for a short distance, but

soon dart down-stream with a velocity that is almost incredible. They

can swim faster than the true fishes, and after they get a start are

generally pretty sure to make good their escape, although we have seen

them dart so wildly and frantically down-stream that they would shoot

clear out on the bank and become an easy victim of the collector. This

peculiar kind of circumstance is most likely to happen with those

lampreys that are becoming blinded from long exposure to the bright

light over the clear running water. If there is a solitary individual

on a nest when disturbed, it may not return to that nest, but to any

that has been started, or it may stay in the deep pool below the

shallows until evening and then move some distance up-stream. When

the nest is large and occupied by several individuals, those that

are disturbed may return to any other such nest. We have never seen

evidence of one female driving another female out of a spawning-nest;

and from the great number of nests in which we have found the numbers

of the females exceeding those of the males, we would be led to infer

that the former live together in greater harmony than do the males.

"Under the subject of the number of eggs laid, we should have said

that at one shake the female spawns from twenty to forty. We once

caught in fine gauze twenty-eight eggs from a female at one spawning

instant. In accordance with the frequency of spawning stated, and the

number of eggs contained in the body of one female, the entire length

of time given to the spawning process would be from two to four days.

This agrees with the observed facts, although the lampreys spend much

time in moving stones and thoroughly covering the nests with sand. Even

after the work of spawning and moving stones is entirely completed,

they remain clinging to rocks in various parts of the stream, until

they are weakened by fungus and general debility, when they gradually

drift down-stream.

"In forming nests there is a distinct tendency to utilize those sites

that are concealed by overhanging bushes, branches, fallen tree-tops,

or grass or weeds, probably not only for concealment, but also to avoid

the bright sunlight, which sooner or later causes them to go blind, as

it does many fishes when they have to live in water without shade.

Toward the end of the spawning season, it is very common to see blind

lampreys clinging helplessly to any rocks on the bottom, quite unable

to again find spawning-beds. However, at such times they are generally

spent and merely awaiting the inevitable end.

"As with the brook lamprey, the time of spawning and duration of the

nesting period depend upon the temperature of the water, as does also

the duration of the period of hatching or development of the embryo.

They first run up-stream when the water reaches a temperature of 45°

or 48° Fahr., and commence spawning at about 50°. A temperature of

60° finds the spawning process in its height, and at 70° it is fairly

completed. It is thus that the rapidity with which the water becomes

heated generally determines the length of time the lampreys remain in

the stream. This may continue later in the season for those that run

later, but usually it is about a month or six weeks from the time the

first of this species is seen on a spawning-nest until the last is

gone."

=What becomes of Lampreys after Spawning?=--"There has been much

conjecture as to the final end of the lampreys, some writers contending

that they die after spawning, others that they return to deep water

and recuperate, and yet others compromise these two widely divergent

views by saying that some die and others do not. The fact is that the

spawning process completely wears out the lampreys, and leaves them in

a physical condition from which they could never recover. They become

stone-blind; the alimentary canal suffers complete atrophy; their

flesh becomes very green from the katabolic products, which find the

natural outlet occluded; they lose their rich yellow color and plump,

symmetrical appearance; their skin becomes torn, scratched, and worn

off in many places, so that they are covered with sores, and they

become covered with a parasitic or sarcophytic fungus, which forms a

dense mat over almost their entire bodies, and they are so completely

debilitated and worn out that recovery is entirely out of the question.

What is more, the most careful microscopical examination of ovaries and

testes has failed to reveal any evidence of new gonads or reproductive

bodies. This is proof that reproduction could not again ensue without

a practical rebuilding of the animals, even though they should regain

their vitality. A. Mueller, in 1865, showed that all the ova in the

lamprey were of the same size, and that after spawning no small

reproductive bodies remained to be developed later. This is strong

evidence of death after once spawning.

"One author writes that an argument against the theory of their dying

after spawning can be found in the fact that so few dead ones have been

found by him. However, many can be found dead if the investigator only

knows how and where to look for them. We should not anticipate finding

them in water that is shallow enough for the bottom to be plainly seen,

as there the current is strong enough to move them. It is in the deep,

quiet, pools where sediment is depositing that the dead lampreys are

dropped by the running water, and there they sink into the soft ooze.

"The absence of great numbers of dead lampreys from visible portions

of the stream cannot be regarded as important evidence against the

argument that they die soon after spawning once, as the bodies are

very soon disintegrated in the water. In the weir that we maintained

in 1898, a number of old, worn-out, and fungus-covered lampreys were

caught drifting down-stream; some were dead, some alive, and others

dying and already insensible, but none were seen going down that

appeared to be in condition to possibly regain their strength."

[Illustration: FIG. 297_a_.--Brook Lamprey, _Lampetra Wilderi_. (After

Gage.)]

A Guide to the Study of Fishes, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 28 / 35 章