CHAPTER XI

INSTINCTS, HABITS, AND ADAPTATIONS

=The Habits of Fishes.=--The habits of fishes can hardly be summarized

in any simple mode of classification. In the usual course of fish-life

the egg is laid in the early spring, in water shallower than that in

which the parents spend their lives. In most cases it is hatched as

the water grows warmer. The eggs of the members of the salmon and cod

families are, however, mostly hatched in cooling waters. The young

fish gathers with others of its species in little schools, feeds on

smaller fishes of other species or of its own, grows and changes until

maturity, deposits its eggs, and the cycle of life begins again, while

the old fish ultimately dies or is devoured.

=Irritability of Animals.=--All animals, of whatever degree of

organization, show in life the quality of irritability or response to

external stimulus. Contact with external things produces some effect

on each of them, and this effect is something more than the mere

mechanical effect on the matter of which the animal is composed. In the

one-celled animals the functions of response to external stimulus are

not localized. They are the property of any part of the protoplasm of

the body. In the higher or many-celled animals each of these functions

is specialized and localized. A certain set of cells is set apart for

each function, and each organ or series of cells is released from all

functions save its own.

=Nerve-cells and Fibres.=--In the development of the individual animal

certain cells from the primitive external layer or ectoblast of the

embryo are set apart to preside over the relations of the creature

to its environment. These cells are highly specialized, and while

some of them are highly sensitive, others are adapted for carrying

or transmitting the stimuli received by the sensitive cells, and

still others have the function of receiving sense-impressions and of

translating them into impulses of motion. The nerve-cells are receivers

of impressions. These are gathered together in nerve-masses or ganglia,

the largest of these being known as the brain, the ganglia in general

being known as nerve-centres. The nerves are of two classes. The one

class, called sensory nerves, extends from the skin or other organ of

sensation to the nerve-centre. The nerves of the other class, motor

nerves, carry impulses to motion.

=The Brain, or Sensorium.=--The brain or other nerve-centre sits

in darkness, surrounded by a bony protecting box. To this main

nerve-centre, or _sensorium_, come the nerves from all parts of the

body that have sensation, the external skin as well as the special

organs of sight, hearing, taste, and smell. With these come nerves

bearing sensations of pain, temperature, muscular effort--all kinds

of sensation which the brain can receive. These nerves are the sole

sources of knowledge to any animal organism. Whatever idea its brain

may contain must be built up through these nerve-impressions. The

aggregate of these impressions constitute the world as the organism

knows it. All sensation is related to action. If an organism is not to

act, it cannot feel, and the intensity of its feeling is related to its

power to act.

=Reflex Action.=--These impressions brought to the brain by the sensory

nerves represent in some degree the facts in the animal's environment.

They teach something as to its food or its safety. The power of

locomotion is characteristic of animals. If they move, their actions

must depend on the indications carried to the nerve-centre from the

outside; if they feed on living organisms, they must seek their food;

if, as in many cases, other living organisms prey on them, they must

bestir themselves to escape. The impulse of hunger on the one hand

and of fear on the other are elemental. The sensorium receives an

impression that food exists in a certain direction. At once an impulse

to motion is sent out from it to the muscles necessary to move the body

in that direction. In the higher animals these movements are more rapid

and more exact. This is because organs of sense, muscles, nerve-fibres,

and the nerve-cells are all alike highly specialized. In the fish the

sensation is slow, the muscular response sluggish, but the method

remains the same. This is simple reflex action, an impulse from the

environment carried to the brain and then unconsciously reflected back

as motion. The impulse of fear is of the same nature. Reflex action is

in general unconscious, but with animals, as with man, it shades by

degrees into conscious action, and into volition or action "done on

purpose."

=Instinct.=--Different animals show differences in method or degree of

response to external influences. Fishes will pursue their prey, flee

from a threatening motion, or disgorge sand or gravel swallowed with

their food. Such peculiarities of different forms of life constitute

the basis of instinct.

Instinct is automatic obedience to the demands of conditions external

to the nervous system. As these conditions vary with each kind of

animal, so must the demands vary, and from this arises the great

variety actually seen in the instincts of different animals. As the

demands of life become complex, so do the instincts. The greater the

stress of environment, the more perfect the automatism, for impulses to

safe action are necessarily adequate to the duty they have to perform.

If the instinct were inadequate, the species would have become extinct.

The fact that its individuals persist shows that they are provided with

the instincts necessary to that end. Instinct differs from other allied

forms of response to external condition in being hereditary, continuous

from generation to generation. This sufficiently distinguishes it from

reason, but the line between instinct and reason and other forms of

reflex action cannot be sharply drawn.

It is not necessary to consider here the question of the origin of

instincts. Some writers regard them as "inherited habits," while

others, with apparent justice, doubt if mere habits or voluntary

actions repeated till they become a "second nature" ever leave a trace

upon heredity. Such investigators regard instinct as the natural

survival of those methods of automatic response which were most useful

to the life of the animal, the individual having less effective methods

of reflex action perishing, leaving no posterity.

=Classification of Instincts.=--The instincts of fishes may be roughly

classified as to their relation to the individual into egoistic and

altruistic instincts.

_Egoistic instincts_ are those which concern chiefly the individual

animal itself. To this class belong the instincts of feeding, those

of self-defense and of strife, the instincts of play, the climatic

instincts, and environmental instincts, those which direct the animal's

mode of life.

_Altruistic instincts_ are those which relate to parenthood and those

which are concerned with the mass of individuals of the same species.

The latter may be called the social instincts. In the former class, the

instincts of parenthood, may be included the instinct of courtship,

reproduction, home-making, nest-building, and care for the young. Most

of these are feebly developed among fishes.

The instincts of feeding are primitively simple, growing complex

through complex conditions. The fish seizes its prey by direct motion,

but the conditions of life modify this simple action to a very great

degree.

The instinct of self-defense is even more varied in its manifestations.

It may show itself either in the impulse to make war on an intruder

or in the desire to flee from its enemies. Among carnivorous forms

fierceness of demeanor serves at once in attack and in defense.

Herbivorous fishes, as a rule, make little direct resistance to their

enemies, depending rather on swiftness of movement, or in some cases on

simple insignificance. To the latter cause the abundance of minnows,

anchovies, and other small or feeble fishes may be attributed, for all

are the prey of carnivorous fishes, which they far exceed in number.

The instincts of courtship relate chiefly to the male, the female

being more or less passive. Among many fishes the male makes himself

conspicuous in the breeding season, spreading his fins, intensifying

his pigmented colors through muscular tension, all this supposedly to

attract the attention of the female. That this purpose is actually

accomplished by such display is not, however, easily proved. In the

little brooks in spring, male minnows can be found with warts on

the nose or head, with crimson pigment on the fins, or blue pigment

on the back, or jet-black pigment all over the head, or with varied

combination of all these. Their instinct is to display all these to

the best advantage, even though the conspicuous hues lead to their own

destruction.

The movements of many migratory animals are mainly controlled by the

impulse to reproduce. Some pelagic fishes, especially flying fishes

and fishes allied to the mackerel, swim long distances to a region

favorable for a deposition of spawn. Some species are known only in the

waters they make their breeding homes, the individuals being scattered

through the wide seas at other times. Many fresh-water fishes, as

trout, suckers, etc., forsake the large streams in the spring,

ascending the small brooks where they can rear their young in greater

safety. Still others, known as anadromous fishes, feed and mature in

the sea, but ascend the rivers as the impulse of reproduction grows

strong. An account of these is given in a subsequent paragraph.

[Illustration: FIG. 118.--Jaws of _Nemichthys avocetta_. Jordan and

Gilbert.]

=Variability of Instincts.=--When we study instincts of animals with

care and in detail, we find that their regularity is much less than has

been supposed. There is as much variation in regard to instinct among

individuals as there is with regard to other characters of the species.

Some power of choice is found in almost every operation of instinct.

Even the most machine-like instinct shows some degree of adaptability

to new conditions. On the other hand, in no animal does reason show

entire freedom from automatism or reflex action. "The fundamental

identity of instinct with intelligence," says Dr. Charles O. Whitman,

"is shown in their dependence upon the same structural mechanism (the

brain and nerves) and in their responsive adaptability."

=Adaptation to Environment.=--In general food-securing structures

are connected with the mouth, or, as in the anglers, are hung as

lures above it; spines of offense and defense, electric organs,

poison-glands, and the like are used in self-protection; the bright

nuptial colors and adornments of the breeding season are doubtfully

classed as useful in rivalry; the egg-sacs, nests, and other structures

or habits may serve to defend the young, while skinny flaps, sand

or weed-like markings, and many other features of mimicry serve as

concessions to the environment.

Each kind of fishes has its own ways of life, fitted to the conditions

of environment. Some species lie on the bottom, flat, as a flounder,

or prone on their lower fins, as a darter or a stone-roller. Some swim

freely in the depths, others at the surface of the depths. Some leap

out of the water from time to time, as the mullet (_Mugil_) or the

tarpon (_Tarpon atlanticus_).

[Illustration: FIG. 119.--Catalina Flying Fish, _Cypsilurus

californicus_ (Cooper). Santa Barbara.]

=Flight of Fishes.=--Some fishes called the flying-fishes sail through

the air with a grasshopper-like motion that closely imitates true

flight. The long pectoral fins, wing-like in form, cannot, however, be

flapped by the fish, the muscles serving only to expand or fold them.

These fishes live in the open sea or open channel, swimming in large

schools. The small species fly for a few feet only, the large ones for

more than an eighth of a mile. These may rise five to twenty feet above

the water.

The flight of one of the largest flying fishes (_Cypsilurus

californicus_) has been carefully studied by Dr. Charles H. Gilbert and

the writer. The movements of the fish in the water are extremely rapid.

The sole motive power is the action under the water of the strong tail.

No force can be acquired while the fish is in the air. On rising from

the water the movements of the tail are continued until the whole body

is out of the water. When the tail is in motion the pectorals seem in

a state of rapid vibration. This is not produced by muscular action

on the fins themselves. It is the body of the fish which vibrates,

the pectorals projecting farthest having the greatest amplitude of

movement. While the tail is in the water the ventral fins are folded.

When the action of the tail ceases the pectorals and ventrals are

spread out wide and held at rest. They are not used as true wings,

but are held out firmly, acting as parachutes, enabling the body to

skim through the air. When the fish begins to fall the tail touches

the water. As soon as it is in the water it begins its motion, and

the body with the pectorals again begins to vibrate. The fish may, by

skimming the water, regain motion once or twice, but it finally falls

into the water with a splash. While in the air it suggests a large

dragon-fly. The motion is very swift, at first in a straight line,

but is later deflected in a curve, the direction bearing little or no

relation to that of the wind. When a vessel passes through a school of

these fishes, they spring up before it, moving in all directions, as

grasshoppers in a meadow.

[Illustration: FIG. 120.--Sand-darter, _Ammocrypta clara_ (Jordan and

Meek). Des Moines River.]

=Quiescent Fishes.=--Some fishes, as the lancelet, lie buried in

the sand all their lives. Others, as the sand-darter (_Ammocrypta

pellucida_) and the hinalea (_Julis gaimard_), bury themselves in the

sand at intervals or to escape from their enemies. Some live in the

cavities of tunicates or sponges or holothurians or corals or oysters,

often passing their whole lives inside the cavity of one animal. Many

others hide themselves in the interstices of kelp or seaweeds. Some

eels coil themselves in the crevices of rocks or coral masses, striking

at their prey like snakes. Some sea-horses cling by their tails to

gulfweed or sea-wrack. Many little fishes (_Gobiomorus_, _Carangus_,

_Psenes_) cluster under the stinging tentacles of the Portuguese

man-of-war or under ordinary jellyfishes. In the tide-pools, whether

rock, coral, or mud, in all regions multitudes of little fishes abound.

As these localities are neglected by most collectors, they have proved

of late years a most prolific source of new species. The tide-pools of

Cuba, Key West, Cape Flattery, Sitka, Unalaska, Monterey, San Diego,

Mazatlan, Hilo, Kailua and Waiahæ in Hawaii, Apia and Pago-Pago in

Samoa, the present writer has found peculiarly rich in rock-loving

forms. Even richer are the pools of the promontories of Japan, Hakodate

Head, Misaki, Awa, Izu, Waka, and Kagoshima, where a whole new fish

fauna unknown to collectors in markets and sandy bays has been brought

to light. Some of these rockfishes are left buried in the rock weeds

as the tide flows, lying quietly until it returns. Others cling to the

rocks by ventral suckers, while still others depend for their safety on

their powers of leaping or on their quickness of their movements in the

water. Those of the latter class are often brilliantly colored, but the

others mimic closely the algæ or the rocks. Some fishes live in the sea

only, some prefer brackish-water. Some are found only in the rivers,

and a few pass more or less indiscriminately from one kind of water to

another.

[Illustration: FIG. 121.--Pearl-fish, _Fierasfer acus_ (Linnæus),

issuing from a _Holothurian_. Coast of Italy. (After Emery.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 122.--Portuguese Man-of-war Fish, _Gobiomorus

gronovii_. Family _Stromateidæ_].

=Migratory Fishes.=--The movements of migratory fishes are mainly

controlled by the impulse of reproduction. Some pelagic fishes,

especially those of the mackerel and flying-fish families, swim long

distances to a region favorable for the deposition of spawn. Others

pursue for equal distances the schools of menhaden or other fishes

which serve as their prey. Some species are known mainly in the waters

they make their breeding homes, as in Cuba, Southern California,

Hawaii, or Japan, the individuals being scattered at other times

through the wide seas.

=Anadromous Fishes.=--Many fresh-water fishes, as trout and suckers,

forsake the large streams in the spring, ascending the small brooks

where their young can be reared in greater safety. Still others, known

as _anadromous_ fishes, feed and mature in the sea, but ascend the

rivers as the impulse of reproduction grows strong. Among such fishes

are the salmon, shad, alewife, sturgeon, and striped bass in American

waters. The most remarkable case of the anadromous instinct is found in

the king salmon or quinnat (_Oncorhynchus tschawytscha_) of the Pacific

Coast. This great fish spawns in November, at the age of four years and

an average weight of twenty-two pounds. In the Columbia River it begins

running with the spring freshets in March and April. It spends the

whole summer, without feeding, in the ascent of the river. By autumn

the individuals have reached the mountain streams of Idaho, greatly

changed in appearance, discolored, worn, and distorted. The male is

humpbacked, with sunken scales, and greatly enlarged, hooked, bent, or

twisted jaws, with enlarged dog-like teeth. On reaching the spawning

beds, which may be a thousand miles from the sea in the Columbia, over

two thousand in the Yukon, the female deposits her eggs in the gravel

of some shallow brook. The male covers them and scrapes the gravel

over them. The female salmon does as much as the male in covering the

eggs. Then both male and female drift tail foremost helplessly down the

stream; none, so far as certainly known, ever survive the reproductive

act. The same habits are found in the five other species of salmon in

the Pacific, but in most cases the individuals do not start so early

nor run so far. The blue-back salmon or redfish, however, does not fall

far short in these regards. The salmon of the Atlantic has a similar

habit, but the distance traveled is everywhere much less, and most of

the hook-jawed males drop down to the sea and survive to repeat the

acts of reproduction.

[Illustration: FIG. 123.--Tide-pools of Misaki. The Misaki Biological

Station, from the north side.]

_Catadromous_ fishes, as the true eel (_Anguilla_), reverse this order,

feeding in the rivers and brackish estuaries, apparently finding their

usual spawning-ground in the sea.

[Illustration: FIG. 124.--Squaw-fish, _Ptychocheilus oregonensis_

(Richardson). Columbia River.]

=Pugnacity of Fishes.=--Some fishes are very pugnacious, always

ready for a quarrel with their own kind. The sticklebacks show this

disposition, especially the males. In Hawaii the natives take advantage

of this trait to catch the Uu (_Myripristis murdjan_), a bright

crimson-colored fish found in those waters. The species lives in

crevices in lava rocks. Catching a live one, the fishermen suspend it

by a string in front of the rocks. It remains there with spread fins

and flashing scales, and the others come out to fight it, when all are

drawn to the surface by a concealed net. Another decoy is substituted

and the trick is repeated until the showy and quarrelsome fishes are

all secured.

In Siam the fighting-fish (_Betta pugnax_) is widely noted. The

following account of this fish is given by Cantor:[11]

"When the fish is in a state of quiet, its dull colors present nothing

remarkable; but if two be brought together, or if one sees its own

image in a looking-glass, the little creature becomes suddenly excited,

the raised fins and the whole body shine with metallic colors of

dazzling beauty, while the projected gill membrane, waving like a black

frill round the throat, adds something of grotesqueness to the general

appearance. In this state it makes repeated darts at its real or

reflected antagonist. But both, when taken out of each other's sight,

instantly become quiet. The fishes were kept in glasses of water, fed

with larvæ of mosquitoes, and had thus lived for many months. The

Siamese are as infatuated with the combats of these fish as the Malays

are with their cock-fights, and stake on the issue considerable sums,

and sometimes their own persons and families. The license to exhibit

fish-fights is farmed, and brings a considerable annual revenue to

the king of Siam. The species abounds in the rivulets at the foot

of the hills of Penang. The inhabitants name it 'Pla-kat,' or the

'fighting-fish'; but the kind kept especially for fighting is an

artificial variety cultivated for the purpose."

A related species is the equally famous tree-climber of India (_Anabas

scandens_). In 1797 Lieutenant Daldorf describes his capture of an

_Anabas_, five feet above the water, on the bark of a palm-tree. In the

effort to do this, the fish held on to the bark by its preopercular

spines, bent its tail, inserted its anal spines, then pushing forward,

repeated the operation.

=Fear and Anger in Fishes.=--From an interesting paper by Surgeon

Francis Day[12] on Fear and Anger in Fishes we may make the following

extracts, slightly condensed and with a few slight corrections in

nomenclature. The paper is written in amplification of another by Rev.

S. J. Whitmee, describing the behavior of aquarium fishes in Samoa.

[Illustration: FIG. 125.--Squaw-fish, _Ptychocheilus grandis_ Agassiz.

Running up a stream to spawn, the high water, after a rain, falling,

leaves the fishes stranded. Kelsey Creek, Clear Lake, California, April

29, 1899. (Photograph by O. E. Meddaugh.)--Page 164.]

The means of expression in animals adverted to by Mr. Darwin (excluding

those of the ears, which would be out of place in fishes) are: sounds,

vocally or otherwise produced; the erection of dermal appendages under

the influence of anger or terror, which last would be analogous to

the erection of scales and fin-rays among fishes. Regarding special

expressions, as those of joy, pain, astonishment, etc., we could

hardly expect such so well marked in fishes as in some of the higher

animals, in which the play of the features often affords us an insight

into their internal emotions. Eyes[13] destitute of movable eyelids,

cheeks covered with scales, or the head enveloped in dermal plates, can

scarcely mantle into a smile or expand into a broad grin. We possess,

however, one very distinct expression in fishes which is absent or but

slightly developed in most of the higher animals, namely, change of

color. All are aware that when a fish sickens, its brilliant colors

fade, but less so how its color may be augmented by anger, and a loss

of it be occasioned by depression, the result of being vanquished by a

foe. Some forms also emit sounds when actuated by terror, and perhaps

in times of anger; but of this last I possess no decided proofs.

Similar to the expression of anger in _Betta_ is that of the

three-spined stickleback (_Gasterosteus aculeatus_).[14] After a fight

between two examples, according to Couch, "a strange alteration takes

place almost immediately in the defeated party: his gallant bearing

forsakes him; his gay colors fade away; he becomes again speckled and

ugly; and he hides his disgrace amongst his peaceable companions who

occupy together that part of the tub which their tyrants have not taken

possession of; he is, moreover, for some time the constant object of

his conqueror's persecution."

Fear is shown by fish in many ways. There is not an angler unacquainted

with the natural timidity of fishes, nor a keeper in charge of a

salmon-pass, who does not know how easy it is for poachers to deter the

salmon from venturing along the path raised expressly for his use.

Among the coral reefs of the Andaman Islands I found the little

_Chromis lepisurus_ abundant. As soon as the water was splashed

they appeared to retire for safety to the branching coral, where no

large fish could follow them; so frightened did they become that on

an Andamanese diving from the side of the boat, they at once sought

shelter in the coral, in which they remained until it was removed

from the sea. In Burma I observed, in 1869, that when weirs are not

allowed to stretch across the rivers (which would impede navigation),

the open side as far as the bank is studded with reeds; these, as the

water passes over them, cause vibration, and occasion a curious sound

alarming the fishes, which, crossing to the weired side of the river,

become captured.

Hooker, alluding to gulls, terns, wild geese, and pelicans in the

Ganges Valley, observes: "These birds congregate by the sides of pools

and beat the water with violence, so as to scare the fish, which then

become an easy prey--a fact which was, I believe, first indicated by

Pallas during his residence on the banks of the Caspian Sea."[15]

Fishes, under the influence of terror, dash about with their fins

expanded, and often run into places which must destroy them. Thus

droves and droves of sardines in the east, impelled by the terror

of pursuing sharks, bonitos, and other voracious fishes, frequently

throw themselves on the shores in enormous quantities. Friar Odoric,

who visited Ceylon about 1320, says: "There are fishes in those seas

which come swimming towards the said country in such abundance, that

for a great distance into the sea nothing can be seen but the backs

of fishes, which, casting themselves on the shore, do suffer men for

the space of three days to come, and to take as many of them as they

please, and then they return again into the sea."[16]

Pennant tells us that the river bullhead (_Cottus gobio_) "deposits

its spawn in a hole it forms in the gravel, and quits it with great

reluctance." General Hardwicke tells how the gouramy (_Osphromenus

gouramy_), in the Mauritius, forms a nest amongst the herbage growing

in the shallow water in the sides of tanks. Here the parent continues

to watch the place with the greatest vigilance, driving away any

interloping fish. The amphibious walking-fish of Mysore (_Ophiocephalus

striatus_) appears to make a nest very similar to that of the gouramy,

and over it the male keeps guard; but should he be killed or captured,

the vacant post is filled by his partner. (Colonel Puckle.) When very

young the fishes keep with and are defended by their parents, but so

soon as they are sufficiently strong to capture prey for themselves

they are driven away to seek their own subsistence. (See Fishes of

India, p. 362.) But it is not only these monogamous amphibious fishes

which show an affection for their eggs and also for their fry, but even

the little _Etroplus maculatus_ has been observed to be equally fond of

its ova. "The eggs are not very numerous and are deposited in the mud

at the bottom of the stream, and, when hatched, both parents guard the

young for many days, vigorously attacking any large fish that passes

near them."[17]

Although the proceedings of the members of the marine and estuary genus

of sea-cat (_Tachysurus_) and its allies show not quite so distinctly

signs of affection, still it must be a well-developed instinct which

induces the male to carry about the eggs in its mouth until hatched,

and to remove them in this manner when danger is imminent. I have taken

the ova just ready for the young to come forth out of the mouth and

fauces of the parent (male) fish; and in every animal dissected there

was no trace of food in the intestinal tract.

=Calling the Fishes.=--At many temples in India fishes are called to

receive food by means of ringing bells or musical sounds. Carew, in

Cornwall, is said to have called the gray mullet together by making a

noise like chopping with a cleaver. Lacépède relates that some fishes,

which had been kept in the basins out of the Tuileries for more than a

century, would come when called by their names, and that in many parts

of Germany trout, carp, and tench are summoned to their food by the

sound of a bell. These instances are mostly due to the fishes having

learned by experience that on the hearing certain sounds they may

expect food. But Lacépède mentions that some were able to distinguish

their individual names; and the same occurs in India. Lieutenant

Connolly[18] remarked upon seeing numerous fishes coming to the ghaut

at Sidhnath to be fed when called; and on "expressing our admiration

of the size of the fish, 'Wait,' said a bystander, 'until you have

seen Raghu.' The Brahmin called out his name in a peculiar tone of

voice; but he would not hear. I threw in handful after handful of

ottah (flour) with the same success, and was just leaving the ghaut,

despairing and doubting, when a loud plunge startled me. I thought

somebody had jumped off the bastion of the ghaut into the river, but

was soon undeceived by the general shout of 'Raghu, raghu,' and by

the fishes, large and small, darting away in every direction. Raghu

made two or three plunges, but was so quick in his motions that I was

unable to guess at his species." [It may be said in relation to these

stories quoted by Dr. Day, that they probably belong to the mythology

of fishes. It is very doubtful if fishes are able to make any such

discrimination among sounds in the air.]

=Sounds of Fishes.=--Pallegoix states that in Siam the dog's-tongue

(_Cynoglossus_) is a kind of sole; it attaches itself to the bottom of

boats, and makes a sonorous noise, which is more musical when several

are stuck to the same boat and act in concert (vol. i. p. 193). These

noises can scarcely be due to anger or fear. Sir J. Bowring (vol. ii.

p. 276) also remarks upon having heard this fish, "which sticks to the

bottoms of the boats, and produces a sound something like that of a

jew's-harp struck slowly, though sometimes it increases in loudness,

so as to resemble the full tones and sound of an organ. My men have

pointed me out a fish about four inches long as the author of the

music."

Some years since, at Madras, I (Dr. Day) obtained several specimens

of a fresh-water Siluroid fish (_Macrones vittatus_) which is termed

the "fiddler" in Mysore. I touched one which was on the wet ground, at

which it appeared to become very irate, erecting its dorsal fin, making

a noise resembling the buzzing of a bee. Having put some small carp

into an aquarium containing one of these fishes, it rushed at a small

example, _seized it by the middle of its back_, and shook it like a dog

killing a rat; at this time its barbels were stiffened out laterally

like a cat's whiskers.

Many fish when captured make noises, perhaps due to terror. Thus the

_Carangus hippos_, _Tetraodon_, and others grunt like a hog. Darwin

(Nat. Journ., vol. vii) remarks on a catfish found in the Rio Paraná,

and called the armado, which is remarkable for a harsh grating noise

when caught by hook and line; this noise can be distinctly heard when

the fish is beneath the water.

The cuckoo-gurnard (_Trigla pini_) and the maigre (_Pseudosciæna

aquila_) utter sounds when taken out of the water; and herrings,

when the net has been drawn over them, have been observed to do the

same: "this effect has been attributed to an escape of air from the

air-bladder; but no air-bladder exists in the _Cottus_, which makes a

similar noise."

The lesser weaver (_Trachinus_) buries itself in the loose soil at the

bottom of the water, leaving only its head exposed, and awaits its

prey. If touched, it strikes upwards or sideways; and Pennant says it

directs its blows with as much judgment as a fighting-cock. (Yarrell,

vol. i. p. 26.) Fishermen assert that wounds from its anterior dorsal

spines are more venomous than those caused by the spines on its

gill-covers.

As regards fighting, I should suppose that, unless some portion of the

body is peculiarly adapted for this purpose, as the rostrum of the

swordfish, or the spine on the side of the tail in the lancet-fishes,

we must look chiefly to the armature or covering of the jaws for

weapons of offense.

=Lurking Fishes.=--Mr. Whitmee supposes that most carnivorous fish

capture their prey by outswimming them; but to this there are numerous

exceptions; the angler or fishing-frog (_Lophis piscatorius_), "while

crouching close to the ground, by the action of its ventral and

pectoral fins stirs up the sand and mud; hidden by the obscurity thus

produced, it elevates its anterior dorsal spines, moves them in various

directions by way of attraction as a bait, and the small fishes,

approaching either to examine or to seize them, immediately become the

prey of the fisher." (Yarrell.) In India we find a fresh-water Siluroid

(_Chaca lophioides_) which "conceals itself among the mud, from which,

by its lurid appearance and a number of loose filamentous substances

on its skin, it is scarcely distinguishable; and with an immense open

mouth it is ready to seize any small prey that is passing along." (Ham.

Buchanan.) In March, 1868, I obtained a fine example of _Ichthyscopus

lebeck_ (Fishes of India, p. 261), which I placed in water having a bed

of mud; into this it rapidly worked itself, first depressing one side

and then another, until only the top of its head and mouth remained

above the mud, whilst a constant current was kept up through its gills.

It made a noise, half snapping and half croaking, when removed from its

native element.

In the Royal Westminster Aquarium, says Dr. Day, is a live example

of the electric eel (_Electrophorus electricus_) which has in its

electric organs the means of showing when it is affected by anger or

terror. Some consider this curious property is for protection against

alligators: it is certainly used against fishes for the purpose of

obtaining food; but when we remember how, when the Indians drive in

horses and mules to the waters infested by the eels, they immediately

attack them, we must admit that such cannot be for the purpose of

preying upon them, but is due to anger or terror at being disturbed.

(DAY.)

=Carrying Eggs in the Mouth.=--Many catfishes (_Siluridæ_) carry their

eggs in the mouth until hatched. The first and most complete account

of this habit of catfishes is that by Dr. Jeffries Wyman, which he

communicated to the Boston Society of Natural History at its meeting on

September 15, 1857. In 1859, in a paper entitled "On Some Unusual Modes

of Gestation," Dr. Wyman published a full account of his observations

as follows, here quoted from a paper on Surinam fishes by Evermann and

Goldsborough:

"Among the Siluroid fishes of Guiana there are several species which,

at certain seasons of the year, have their mouths and branchial

cavities filled either with eggs or young, and, as is believed, for the

purpose of incubation. My attention was first called to this singular

habit by the late Dr. Francis W. Cragin, formerly United States consul

at Paramaribo, Surinam. In a letter dated August, 1854, he says:

"'The eggs you will receive are from another fish. The different

fishermen have repeatedly assured me that these eggs in their nearly

mature state are carried in the mouths of the parent till the young are

relieved by the bursting of the sac. Do you either know or believe this

to be so, and, if possible, where are the eggs conceived and how do

they get into the mouth?'

"In the month of April, 1857, on visiting the market of Paramaribo, I

found that this statement, which at first seemed to be very improbable,

was correct as to the existence of eggs in the mouths of several

species of fish. In a tray of fish which a negro woman offered for

sale, I found the mouths of several filled with either eggs or young,

and subsequently an abundance of opportunities occurred for repeating

the observation. The kinds most commonly known to the colonists,

especially to the negroes, are _jara-bakka_, _njinge-njinge_, _koepra_,

_makrede_, and one or two others, all belonging either to the genus

_Bagrus_ or one nearly allied to it. The first two are quite common in

the market, and I have seen many specimens of them; for the last two I

have the authority of negro fishermen, but have never seen them myself.

The eggs in my collection are of three different sizes, indicating so

many species, one of the three having been brought to me without the

fish from which they were taken.

"The eggs become quite large before they leave the ovaries, and are

arranged in three zones corresponding to three successive broods, and

probably to be discharged in three successive years; the mature eggs

of a jara-bakka 18 inches long measure three-fourths of an inch in

diameter; those of the second zone, one-fourth; and those of the third

are very minute, about one-sixteenth of an inch.

"A careful examination of eight specimens of njinge-njinge about 9

inches long gave the following results:

"The eggs in all instances were carried in the mouths of the males.

This protection, or gestation of the eggs by the males, corresponds

with what has been long noticed with regard to other fishes, as, for

example, _Syngnathus_, where the marsupial pouch for the eggs or

young is found in the males only, and _Gasterosteus_, where the male

constructs the nest and protects the eggs during incubation from the

voracity of the females.

"In some individuals the eggs had been recently laid, in others they

were hatched and the foetus had grown at the expense of some other food

than that derived from the yolk, as this last was not proportionally

diminished in size, and the foetus weighed more than the undeveloped

egg. The number of eggs contained in the mouth was between twenty

and thirty. The mouth and branchial cavity were very much distended,

rounding out and distorting the whole hyoid and branchiostegal region.

Some of the eggs even partially protruded from the mouth. The ova were

not bruised or torn as if they had been bitten or forcibly held by the

teeth. In many instances the foetuses were still alive, though the

parent had been dead for many hours.

"No young or eggs were found in the stomach, although the mouth was

crammed to its fullest capacity.

"The above observations apply to njinge-njinge. With regard to

jarra-bakka, I had but few opportunities for dissection, but in several

instances the same conditions of the eggs were noticed as stated above;

and in one instance, besides some nearly mature foetuses contained in

the mouth, two or three were squeezed apparently from the stomach,

but not bearing any marks of violence or of the action of the gastric

fluid. It is probable that these found their way into that last cavity

after death, in consequence of the relaxation of the sphincter which

separates the cavities of the mouth and the stomach. These facts lead

to the conclusion that this is a mouth gestation, as the eggs are found

there in all stages of development, and even for some time after they

are hatched.

"The question will be very naturally asked, how under such

circumstances these fishes are able to secure and swallow their food. I

have made no observations bearing upon such a question. Unless the food

consists of very minute particles it would seem necessary that during

the time of feeding the eggs should be disgorged. If this supposition

be correct, it would give a very probable explanation of the only fact

which might be considered at variance with the conclusion stated above,

viz., that we have in these fishes a mouth gestation. In the mass

of eggs with which the mouth is filled I have occasionally found the

eggs, rarely more than one or two, of another species. The only way in

which their presence may be accounted for, it seems to me, is by the

supposition that while feeding the eggs are disgorged, and as these

fishes are gregarious in their habits, when the ova are recovered the

stray eggs of another species may be introduced into the mouth among

those which naturally belong there."

One of the earliest accounts of this curious habit which we have seen

is that by Dr. Günther, referring to specimens of _Tachysurus fissus_

from Cayenne received from Prof. R. Owen:

"These specimens having had the cavity of the mouth and of the gills

extended in an extraordinary manner, I was induced to examine the cause

of it, when, to my great surprise, I found them filled with about

twenty eggs, rather larger than an ordinary pea, perfectly uninjured,

and with the embryos in a forward state of development. The specimens

are males, from 6 to 7 inches long, and in each the stomach was almost

empty.

"Although the eggs might have been put into the mouth of the fish by

their captor, this does not appear probable. On the other hand, it

is a well-known fact that the American Siluroids take care of their

progeny in various ways; and I have no doubt that in this species and

in its allies the males carry the eggs in their mouths, depositing them

in places of safety and removing them when they fear the approach of

danger or disturbance."

=The Unsymmetrical Eyes of Flounders.=--In the two great families of

flounders and soles the head is unsymmetrically formed, the cranium

being twisted and both eyes placed on the same side. The body is

strongly compressed, and the side possessing the eyes is uppermost in

all the actions of the fish. This upper side, whether right or left, is

colored, while the eyeless side is white or very nearly so.

It is well known that in the very young flounder the body rests

upright in the water. After a little there is a tendency to turn to

one side and the lower eye begins its migration to the other side, the

interorbital bones or part of them moving before it. In most flounders

the eye seems to move over the surface of the head, before the dorsal

fin, or across the axil of its first ray. In the tropical genus

_Platophrys_ the movement of the eye is most easily followed, as the

species reach a larger size than do most flounders before the change

takes place. The larva, while symmetrical, is in all cases transparent.

[Illustration: FIG. 126.]

[Illustration: FIG. 127.

FIGS. 126, 127.--Larval stages of _Platophrys podas_, a flounder of the

Mediterranean, showing the migration of the eye. (After Emery.)]

In a recent study of the migration of the eye in the winter flounder

(_Pseudopleuronectes americanus_) Mr. Stephen R. Williams reaches the

following conclusions:

1. The young of _Limanda ferruginea_ (the rusty dab) are probably in

the larval stage at the same time as those of _Pseudopleuronectes

americanus_ (the winter flounder).

2. The recently hatched fish are symmetrical, except for the relative

positions of the two optic nerves.

3. The first observed occurrence in preparation for metamorphosis in

_P. americanus_ is the rapid resorption of the part of the supraorbital

cartilage bar which lies in the path of the eye.

4. Correlated with this is an increase in distance between the eyes

and the brain, caused by the growth of the facial cartilages.

5. The migrating eye moves through an arc of about 120 degrees.

[Illustration: FIG. 128.--_Platophrys lunatus_ (Linnæus), the Wide-eyed

Flounder. Family _Pleuronectidæ_. Cuba. (From nature by Mrs. H. C.

Nash.)]

6. The greater part of this rotation (three-fourths of it in _P.

americanus_) is a rapid process, taking not more than three days.

7. The anterior ethmoidal region is not so strongly influenced by the

twisting as the ocular region.

[Illustration: FIG. 129.--Young Flounder, just hatched, with

symmetrical eyes. (After S. R. Williams.)]

8. The location of the olfactory nerves (in the adult) shows that the

morphological midline follows the interorbital septum.

9. The cartilage mass lying in the front part of the orbit of the adult

eye is a separate anterior structure in the larva.

10. With unimportant differences, the process of metamorphosis in the

sinistral fish is parallel to that in the dextral fish.

11. The original location of the eye is indicated in the adult by the

direction first taken, as they leave the brain, by those cranial nerves

having to do with the transposed eye.

12. The only well-marked asymmetry in the adult brain is due to the

much larger size of the olfactory nerve and lobe of the ocular side.

13. There is a perfect chiasma.

14. The optic nerve of the migrating eye is always anterior to that of

the other eye.

[Illustration: FIG. 130.--Larval Flounder, _Pseudopleuronectes

americanus_. (After S. R. Williams.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 131.--Larval Flounder, _Pseudopleuronectes

americanus_. (After S. R. Williams.)]

"The why of the peculiar metamorphosis of the _Pleuronectidæ_ is an

unsolved problem. The presence or absence of a swim-bladder can have

nothing to do with the change of habit of the young flatfish, for _P.

americanus_ must lose its air-bladder before metamorphosis begins,

since sections showed no evidence of it, whereas in _Lophopsetta

maculata_, 'the windowpane flounder,' the air-sac can often be seen

by the naked eye up to the time when the fish assumes the adult

coloration, and long after it has assumed the adult form.

"Cunningham has suggested that the weight of the fish acting upon the

lower eye after the turning would press it toward the upper side out

of the way. But in all probability the planktonic larva rests on the

sea-bottom little if at all before metamorphosing. Those taken by Mr.

Williams into the laboratory showed in resting no preference for either

side until the eye was near the midline.

"The fact that the change in all fishes is repeated during the

development of each individual fish has been used to support the

proposition that the flatfishes as a family are a comparatively recent

product. They are, on the other hand, comparatively ancient. According

to Zittel flatfishes of species referable to genera living at present,

_Rhombus_ (_Bothus_) and _Solea_, are found in the Eocene deposits.

These two genera are notable in that _Bothus_ is one of the least and

_Solea_ the most unsymmetrical of the _Pleuronectidæ_.

[Illustration: FIG. 132.--Face view of recently hatched Flounder.

(After S. R. Williams.)]

"The degree of asymmetry can be correlated with the habit of the

animal. Those fishes, such as the sole and shore-dwelling flounders,

which keep to the bottom are the most twisted representatives of the

family, while the more freely swimming forms, like the sand-dab, summer

flounder, and halibut, are more nearly symmetrical. Asymmetry must be

of more advantage to those fishes which grub in the mud for their food

than to those which capture other fishes; of the latter those which

move with the greatest freedom are the most symmetrical.

"This deviation from the bilateral condition must have come about

either as a 'sport' or by gradual modification of the adults. If by the

latter method--the change proving to be advantageous--selection favored

its appearing earlier and earlier in ontogeny, until it occurred in the

stages of planktonic life. Metamorphosis at a stage earlier than this

would be a distinct disadvantage, because of the lack of the customary

planktonic food at the sea-bottom. At present some forms of selection

are probably continually at work fixing the limit of the period of

metamorphosis by the removal of those individuals which attempt the

transformation at unsuitable epochs; for instance, at the time of

hatching. That there are such individuals is shown by Fullarton, who

figures a fish just hatched 'anticipating the twisting and subsequent

unequal development exhibited by the head of Pleuronectids.' Those

larvæ which remain pelagic until better able to compete at the

sea-bottom become the adults which fix the time of metamorphosis on

their progeny." (S. R. WILLIAMS.)

So far as known to the writer, the metamorphosis of flounders always

occurs while the individual is still translucent and swimming at the

surface of the sea before sinking to the bottom.

FOOTNOTES:

[11] Cantor, Catal. Malayan Fishes, 1850, p. 87. Bowring, Siam, p. 155,

gives a similar account of the battles of these fishes.

[12] Francis Day, on Fear and Anger in Fishes, Proc. Zool. Society,

London, Feb. 19, 1878, pp. 214-221.

[13] Couch (Illustrations, etc., p. 305) says: "The faculty of giving

forth brilliant light from the eyes is said to have been observed by

fishermen in the blue shark, as in a cat."

[14] Couch, "British Fishes," 1865, vol. iv. p. 172.

[15] Himalayan Journals, vol. i. p. 80.

[16] Hakluyt, vol. ii. p. 37.

[17] Jerdon, "Madras Journal of Literature and Science," 1849, p. 143.

[18] "Observations on the Past and Present Condition of Onjein,"

Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vi, p. 820.

A Guide to the Study of Fishes, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 11 / 35 章