AFFIDAVIT

PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION

ON THE ASSASSINATION OF

PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, _ss_:

James D. Crowley, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

On August 13, 1961, he was duly appointed an officer in the Department

of State, as a specialist in intelligence matters; that he has

continued to serve in that capacity since that time, and that he has

personal knowledge of the matters related in this affidavit:

1. I am one of the officers in the Department of State responsible for

disseminating throughout the Department various reports, memoranda

and documents which are received from other United States Government

agencies.

2. The first time I remember learning of Oswald's existence was when I

received copies of a telegraphic message, dated October 10, 1963, from

the Central Intelligence Agency, which contained information pertaining

to his current activities. I requested that a search of the Office

of Security records be made on October 11, 1963, to determine if the

Department had received any information previously. Based on a quick

review of the Office of Security file on Oswald, I disseminated copies

of the Central Intelligence Agency message to the various offices

within the Department which were interested in receiving this type of

material.

3. I also briefly reviewed Oswald's Office of Security file on November

14, 1963. Although I am not certain, I believe the impetus for this

review was either my receipt of a Federal Bureau of Investigation

report dated October 31, 1963 on Lee Harvey Oswald or my receipt

of a Federal Bureau of Investigation report dated October 25, 1963

on the Fair Play for Cuba Committee--New Orleans Division. Both of

these reports were received in the Intelligence Processing Section on

November 8, 1963.

4. In both instances, I reviewed the Office of Security file in a

routine manner and had it returned to the Office of Security File Room

the same day in which it was charged to me.

Signed this 12th day of June 1964.

(S) James D. Crowley,

JAMES D. CROWLEY.

Transcriber's Notes:

Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant

preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed.

Misspellings in quoted evidence not changed; misspellings that could be

due to mispronunciations were not changed.

Some simple typographical errors were corrected.

Inconsistent hyphenation of compound words retained.

Ambiguous end-of-line hyphens retained.

Occasional uses of "Mr." for "Mrs." and of "Mrs." for "Mr." corrected.

Dubious repeated words, (e.g., "What took place by way of of

conversation?") retained.

Several unbalanced quotation marks not remedied.

Occasional periods that should be question marks not changed.

Occasional periods that should be commas, and commas that should be

periods, were changed only when they clearly had been misprinted (at

the end of a paragraph or following a speaker's name in small-caps at

the beginning of a line). Some commas and semi-colons were printed so

faintly that they appear to be periods or colons: some were found and

corrected, but some almost certainly remain.

In the source for this Volume, the name "De Mohrenschildt" sometimes

is printed in quoted material or Affidavits as "de Mohrenschildt"

or "deMohrenschildt", and all variations have been retained here.

In another Volume, which contained testimony from Mr. and Mrs. De

Mohrenschildt, "De" always was capitalized and was a separate word.

Footnotes have been repositioned to immediately follow the Affidavits

or other information that reference them.

The Index and illustrated Exhibits volumes of this series may not be

available at Project Gutenberg.

The Preface and Contents refer to "Mrs. J. V. Allen" but the name in her

Affidavit is "Mrs. J. U. Allen". None of these were changed here.

Page 67: "enclosed is an envelope" probably should be "in".

Page 70: "Mr. Pic. Is just a letter marked Exhibit No. 34." is a

misprint for "Mr. Jenner."

Page 94: "merely to with the argument" probably should be "to win".

Page 212: "Out Intourist Guide's name" was printed that way.

Page 282: "ribbons in here hair" was printed that way.

Page 288: "I wasn't in her being down there at the time." was printed

that way.

Page 301: "The testimony of Maj. Eugene D. Anderson was taken" was

misprinted with the initial "A" instead of "D"; changed here for

consistency with other instances.

Page 373: "put an Americano came too" possibly should be "name".

Page 437: "from a 22 caliber rifle" was printed without a period

before "22".

Page 439: "carlot" was printed that way.

Page 473: "Jack W. Bucham" was printed with that way, not as "Burcham".

Warren Commission (11 of 26): Hearings Vol. XI (of 15) · 第 297 / 297 题