Mr. JENNER. This was in New Orleans on Monday the 25th of----

Mr. THORNLEY. This was on an afternoon. Does he have the time down?

Mr. JENNER. 25th of November.

Mr. THORNLEY. That was Secret Service, wasn't it? Let's see, the 22d,

23d, 24th.

Mr. JENNER. This was Special Agent Merwin Alderson and Special Agent

Richard Farrell. It was the Monday following the assassination.

Mr. THORNLEY. What I believe happened is--I believe they arrived in

Arnaud's Restaurant where I was working at the time about midnight

Sunday night so it would actually be Monday, yes, sir, that they talked

to me. I gathered at the time these gentlemen were from the Secret

Service, but those are the gentlemen.

Mr. JENNER. Did you say to them in connection with this sudden

termination of the relationship between yourself and Oswald "that you

had made this comment to Oswald, that he was a Communist and that

things would be different when the revolution came"?

Mr. THORNLEY. No; I didn't tell them he was a Communist; no. But

Oswald, certainly that was his reason for his anger. There was an

implied accusation of communism in my saying, "Comes the revolution you

will change all that."

Mr. JENNER. Yes.

Mr. THORNLEY. You see, he wasn't understanding the comments I was

making in relation to "1984" at all, our traditional meeting ground

here. He was interpreting them in light of his alleged communism, and

that is why he became angry. But no; I didn't say to him, "You are a

Communist"--ever.

Mr. JENNER. It is your explanation.

Mr. THORNLEY. This was not my opinion.

Mr. JENNER. You are saying that he interpreted your comment to be that

you accused him of being a Communist, and then he made the remark, "Not

you, too."

Mr. THORNLEY. I am sure he interpreted that that way but I certainly

didn't think he was a Communist and I certainly didn't tell him so.

Mr. JENNER. To what did you attribute this inability of his to maintain

reasonably cordial or at least military-service family relations with

his fellow marines?

Mr. THORNLEY. Well, at the time I just thought--well, the man is a

nut--at the very moment it happened, I dismissed it without thinking

about it.

Mr. JENNER. See if you can articulate a little more, when you say "a

nut," a lot of people will interpret the expression "a nut" differently.

Mr. THORNLEY. I understand that. I was just trying to give you my

first impression first: that he was some kind of a nut, and I stopped

thinking about it.

Mr. JENNER. You mean a nut in the sense of an extremist, not an

organized thinker?

Mr. THORNLEY. I didn't think about that enough to classify it. I just

thought, "something is wrong with him, maybe something is bugging him

today, maybe he is crazy, I don't know what," but I just wasn't at that

moment--it wasn't that important to me, I didn't feel much better than

he did that morning, I am sure, so I just shrugged it off.

Later, I did reflect on it, and that, combined with his general

habits in relation to his superiors, and to the other men in the

outfit, caused me to decide that he had a definite tendency toward

irrationality at times, an emotional instability. Once again right

away, I didn't know exactly what was the cause of this. A couple of

years later I had good reason to think about it some more, at which

time I noticed----

Mr. JENNER. Now when please? Before the assassination?

Warren Commission (11 of 26): Hearings Vol. XI (of 15) · 第 75 / 297 题