A wave of hysteria swept the Committee and the War Office and beat

fiercely upon Lincoln. The Board charged him to save the day by mulcting

the army of the Potomac of an entire corps, retaining it at Washington.

Lincoln met the Board in a long and troubled conference. His anxious

desire to do all he could for McClellan was palpable.(25) But what,

under the circumstances, could he do? Here was this new device for the

steadying of his judgment, this Council of Experts, singing the same old

tune, assuring him that McClellan was not to be trusted. Although in the

reaction from his momentary vengefulness he had undoubtedly swung far

back toward recovering confidence in McClellan, did he dare--painfully

conscious as he was that he "had no military knowledge"--did he dare go

against the Board, disregard its warning that McClellan's arrangements

made of Washington a dangling plum for Confederate raiders to snatch

whenever they pleased. His bewilderment as to what McClellan was really

driving at came back upon him in full force. He reached at last the

dreary conclusion that there was nothing for it but to let the new wheel

within the wheels take its turn at running the machine. Accepting the

view that McClellan had not kept faith on the basis of the orders of

March thirteenth, Lincoln "after much consideration" set aside his own

promise to McClellan and authorized the Secretary of War to detain a

full corps.(26)

McClellan never forgave this mutilation of his army and in time fixed

upon it as the prime cause of his eventual failure on the Peninsula. It

is doubtful whether relations between him and Lincoln were ever again

really cordial.

In their rather full correspondence during the tense days of April, May

and June, the steady deterioration of McClellan's judgment bore him

down into amazing depths of fatuousness. In his own way he was as much

appalled by the growth of his responsibility as ever Lincoln had been.

He moved with incredible caution.*

*Commenting on one of his moments of hesitation, J.S.

Johnston wrote to Lee: "No one but McClellan could have

hesitated to attack." 14 O. R., 416.

His despatches were a continual wailing for more men. Whatever went

wrong was at once blamed on Washington. His ill-usage had made him

bitter. And he could not escape the fact that his actual performance did

not come up to expectation; that he was constantly out-generaled. His

prevailing temper during these days is shown in a letter to his wife.

"I have raised an awful row about McDowell's corps. The President very

coolly telegraphed me yesterday that he thought I ought to break the

enemy's lines at once. I was much tempted to reply that he had better

come and do it himself." A despatch to Stanton, in a moment of disaster,

has become notorious: "If I save this army now, I tell you plainly I owe

no thanks to you or to any other persons in Washington. You have done

your best to sacrifice this army."(27)

Throughout this preposterous correspondence, Lincoln maintained the

even tenor of his usual patient stoicism, "his sad lucidity of soul."

He explained; he reasoned; he promised, over and over, assistance to the

limit of his power; he never scolded; when complaint became too absurd

to be reasoned with, he passed it over in silence. Again, he was

the selfless man, his sensibilities lost in the purpose he sought to

establish.

Once during this period, he acted suddenly, on the spur of the moment,

in a swift upflaring of his unconquerable fear for the safety of

Washington. Previously, he had consented to push the detained corps,

McDowell's, southward by land to cooperate with McClellan, who adapted

his plans to this arrangement. Scarcely had he done so, than

Lincoln threw his plans into confusion by ordering McDowell back to

Washington.(28) Jackson, who had begun his famous campaign of menace,

was sweeping like a whirlwind down the Shenandoah Valley, and in the

eyes of panic-struck Washington appeared to be a reincarnation of

Southey's Napoleon,--

"And the great Few-Faw-Fum, would presently come,

With a hop, skip and jump"

into Pennsylvania Avenue. As Jackson's object was to bring McDowell back

to Washington and enable Johnston to deal with McClellan unreinforced,

Lincoln had fallen into a trap. But he had much company. Stanton was

well-nigh out of his head. Though Jackson's army was less than fifteen

thousand and the Union forces in front of him upward of sixty thousand,

Stanton telegraphed to Northern governors imploring them to hasten

forward militia because "the enemy in great force are marching on

Washington."(29)

The moment Jackson had accomplished his purpose, having drawn a great

army northwestward away from McClellan, most of which should have been

marching southeastward to join McClellan, he slipped away, rushed his

own army across the whole width of Virginia, and joined Lee in the

terrible fighting of the Seven Days before Richmond.

In the midst of this furious confusion, the men surrounding Lincoln may

be excused for not observing a change in him. They have recorded his

appearance of indecision, his solicitude over McClellan, his worn and

haggard look. The changing light in those smoldering fires of his

deeply sunken eyes escaped their notice. Gradually, through profound

unhappiness, and as always in silence, Lincoln was working out of

his last eclipse. No certain record of his inner life during this

transition, the most important of his life, has survived. We can judge

of it only by the results. The outstanding fact with regard to it is a

certain change of attitude, an access of determination, late in June.

What desperate wrestling with the angel had taken place in the months of

agony since his son's death, even his private secretaries have not felt

able to say. Neither, apparently, did they perceive, until it flashed

upon them full-blown, the change that was coming over his resolution.

Nor did the Cabinet have any warning that the President was turning

a corner, developing a new phase of himself, something sterner, more

powerful than anything they had suspected. This was ever his way. His

instinctive reticence stood firm until the moment of the new birth. Not

only the Cabinet but the country was amazed and startled, when, late in

June, the President suddenly left Washington. He made a flying trip to

West Point where Scott was living in virtual retirement.(30) What passed

between the two, those few hours they spent together, that twenty-fourth

of June, 1862, has never been divulged. Did they have any eyes, that

day, for the wonderful prospect from the high terrace of the parade

ground; for the river so far below, flooring the valley with silver;

for the mountains pearl and blue? Did they talk of Stanton, of his

waywardness, his furies? Of the terrible Committee? Of the way Lincoln

had tied his own hands, brought his will to stalemate, through his

recognition of the unofficial councils? Who knows?

Lincoln was back in Washington the next day. Another day, and by a

sweeping order he created a new army for the protection of Washington,

and placed in command of it, a western general who was credited with

a brilliant stroke on the Mississippi.(31) No one will now defend the

military genius of John Pope. But when Lincoln sent for him, all the

evidence to date appeared to be in his favor. His follies were yet to

appear. And it is more than likely that in the development of Lincoln's

character, his appointment has a deep significance. It appears to mark

the moment when Lincoln broke out of the cocoon of advisement he had

spun unintentionally around his will. In the sorrows of the grim year,

new forces had been generated. New spiritual powers were coming to his

assistance. At last, relatively, he had found peace. Worn and torn as

he was, after his long inward struggle, few bore so calmly as he did

the distracting news from the front in the closing days of June and the

opening days of July, when Lee was driving his whole strength like

a superhuman battering-ram, straight at the heart of the wavering

McClellan. A visitor at the White House, in the midst of the terrible

strain of the Seven Days, found Lincoln "thin and haggard, but cheerful

. . . quite as placid as usual . . . his manner was so kindly and so

free from the ordinary cocksureness of the politician, and the vanity

and self-importance of official position that nothing but good will was

inspired by his presence."(32)

His serenity was all the more remarkable as his relations with

Congress and the Committee were fast approaching a crisis. If McClellan

failed-and by the showing of his own despatches, there was every reason

to expect him to fail, so besotted was he upon the idea that no one

could prevail with the force allowed him--the Committee who were leaders

of the congressional party against the presidential party might be

expected promptly to measure strength with the Administration. And

McClellan failed. At that moment Chandler, with the consent of the

Committee, was making use of its records preparing a Philippic against

the government. Lincoln, acting on his own initiative, without asking

the Secretary of War to accompany him, went immediately to the front.

He passed two days questioning McClellan and his generals.(33) But there

was no council of war. It was a different Lincoln from that other who,

just four months previous, had called together the general officers and

promised them to abide by their decisions. He returned to Washington

without telling them what he meant to do.

The next day closed a chapter and opened a chapter in the history of

the Federal army. Stanton's brief and inglorious career as head of the

national forces came to an end. He fell back into his rightful

position, the President's executive officer in military affairs. Lincoln

telegraphed another Western general, Halleck, ordering him to Washington

as General-in-Chief.(34) He then, for a season, turned his whole

attention from the army to politics. Five days after the telegram to

Halleck, Chandler in the Senate, loosed his insatiable temper in what

ostensibly was a denunciation of McClellan, what in point of fact was a

sweeping arraignment of the military efficiency of the government.(35)

XXII. LINCOLN EMERGES

While Lincoln was slowly struggling out of his last eclipse, giving

most of his attention to the army, the Congressional Cabal was laboring

assiduously to force the issue upon slavery. The keen politicians who

composed it saw with unerring vision where, for the moment, lay their

opportunity. They could not beat the President on any one issue then

before the country. No one faction was strong enough to be their

stand-by. Only by a combination of issues and a coalition of

factions could they build up an anti-Lincoln party, check-mate the

Administration, and get control of the government. They were greatly

assisted by the fatuousness of the Democrats. That party was in a

peculiar situation. Its most positive characters, naturally, had taken

sides for or against the government. The powerful Southerners who had

been its chief leaders were mainly in the Confederacy. Such Northerners

as Douglas and Stanton, and many more, had gone over to the Republicans.

Suddenly the control of the party organization had fallen into the hands

of second-rate men. As by the stroke of an enchanter's wand, men of

small caliber who, had the old conditions remained, would have lived

and died of little consequence saw opening before them the role of

leadership. It was too much for their mental poise. Again the subjective

element in politics! The Democratic party for the duration of the war

became the organization of Little Men. Had they possessed any great

leaders, could they have refused to play politics and responded to

Lincoln's all-parties policy, history might have been different. But

they were not that sort. Neither did they have the courage to go to the

other extreme and become a resolute opposition party, wholeheartedly and

intelligently against the war. They equivocated, they obstructed, they

professed loyalty and they practised-it would be hard to say what! So

short-sighted was their political game that its effect continually

was to play into the hands of their most relentless enemies, the grim

Jacobins.

Though, for a brief time while the enthusiasm after Sumter was still at

its height they appeared to go along with the all-parties program, they

soon revealed their true course. In the autumn of 1861, Lincoln still

had sufficient hold upon all factions to make it seem likely that his

all-parties program would be given a chance. The Republicans generally

made overtures to the Democratic managers, offering to combine in a

coalition party with no platform but the support of the war and the

restoration of the Union. Here was the test of the organization of

the Little Men. The insignificant new managers, intoxicated by

the suddenness of their opportunity, rang false. They rejected the

all-parties program and insisted on maintaining their separate party

formation.(1) This was a turning point in Lincoln's career. Though

nearly two years were to pass before he admitted his defeat, the

all-parties program was doomed from that hour. Throughout the winter,

the Democrats in Congress, though steadily ambiguous in their statements

of principle, were as steadily hostile to Lincoln. If they had any

settled policy, it was no more than an attempt to hold the balance of

power among the warring factions of the Republicans. By springtime the

game they were playing was obvious; also its results. They had prevented

the President from building up a strong Administration group wherewith

he might have counterbalanced the Jacobins. Thus they had released the

Jacobins from the one possible restraint that might have kept them from

pursuing their own devices.

The spring of 1862 saw a general realignment of factions. It was

then that the Congressional Cabal won its first significant triumph.

Hitherto, all the Republican platforms had been programs of denial.

A brilliant new member of the Senate, john Sherman, bluntly told his

colleagues that the Republican party had always stood on the defensive.

That was its weakness. "I do not know any measure on which it has taken

an aggressive position."(2) The clue to the psychology of the moment

was in the raging demand of the masses for a program of assertion, for

aggressive measures. The President was trying to meet this demand with

his all-parties program, with his policy of nationalism, exclusive of

everything else. And recently he had added that other assertion, his

insistence that the executive in certain respects was independent of the

legislative. Of his three assertions, one, the all-parties program,

was already on the way to defeat Another, nationalism, as the President

interpreted it, had alienated the Abolitionists. The third, his argument

for himself as tribune, was just what your crafty politician might

twist, pervert, load with false meanings to his heart's content. Men

less astute than Chandler and Wade could not have failed to see where

fortune pointed. Their opportunity lay in a combination of the two

issues. Abolition and the resistance to executive "usurpation." Their

problem was to create an anti-Lincoln party that should also be a

war party. Their coalition of aggressive forces must accept the

Abolitionists as its backbone, but it must also include all violent

elements of whatever persuasion, and especially all those that could be

wrought into fury on the theme of the President as a despot. Above all,

their coalition must absorb and then express the furious temper so dear

to their own hearts which they fondly believed-mistakenly, they were

destined to discover-was the temper of the country.

It can not be said that this was the Republican program. The

President's program, fully as positive as that of the Cabal, had as good

a right to appropriate the party label--as events were to show, a better

right. But the power of the Cabal was very great, and the following it

was able to command in the country reached almost the proportions of the

terrible. A factional name is needed. For the Jacobins, their allies in

Congress, their followers in the country, from the time they acquired a

positive program, an accurate label is the Vindictives.

During the remainder of the session, Congress may be thought of as

having--what Congress seldom has--three definite groups, Right, Left and

Center. The Right was the Vindictives; the Left, the irreconcilable

Democrats; the Center was composed chiefly of liberal Republicans but

included a few Democrats, those who rebelled against the political

chicanery of the Little Men.

The policy of the Vindictives was to force upon the Administration the

double issue of emancipation and the supremacy of Congress. Therefore,

their aim was to pass a bill freeing the slaves on the sole authority of

a congressional act. Many resolutions, many bills, all having this end

in view, were introduced. Some were buried in committees; some were

remade in committees and subjected to long debate by the Houses; now

and then one was passed upon. But the spring wore through and the

summer came, and still the Vindictives were not certainly in control

of Congress. No bill to free slaves by congressional action secured a

majority vote. At the same time it was plain that the strength of the

Vindictives was slowly, steadily, growing.

Outside Congress, the Abolitionists took new hope. They had organized a

systematic propaganda. At Washington, weekly meetings were held in

the Smithsonian Institute, where all their most conspicuous leaders,

Phillips, Emerson, Brownson, Garret Smith, made addresses. Every Sunday

a service was held in the chamber of the House of Representatives and

the sermon was almost always a "terrific arrangement of slavery."

Their watch-word was "A Free Union or Disintegration." The treatment of

fugitive slaves by commanders in the field produced a clamor. Lincoln

insisted on strict obedience to the two laws, the Fugitive Slave Act and

the First Confiscation Act. Abolitionists sneered at "all this gabble

about the sacredness of the Constitution."(3) But Lincoln was not to

be moved. When General Hunter, taking a leaf from the book of Fremont,

tried to force his hand, he did not hesitate. Hunter had issued a

proclamation by which the slaves in the region where he commanded were

"declared forever free."

This was in May when Lincoln's difficulties with McClellan were at their

height; when the Committee was zealously watching to catch him in any

sort of mistake; when the House was within four votes of a majority for

emancipation by act of Congress;(4) when there was no certainty whether

the country was with him or with the Vindictives. Perhaps that new

courage which definitely revealed itself the next month, may be first

glimpsed in the proclamation overruling Hunter:

"I further make known that whether it be competent for me, as

Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy, to declare the slaves of any

State or States free, and whether at any time, in any case, it shall

have become a necessity indispensable to the maintenance of the

government to exercise such supposed power, are questions which,

under my responsibility, I reserve to myself, and which I can not feel

justified in leaving to the decision of commanders in the field."(5)

The revocation of Hunter's order infuriated the Abolitionists. It deeply

disappointed the growing number who, careless about slavery, wanted

emancipation as a war measure, as a blow at the South. Few of either of

these groups noticed the implied hint that emancipation might come by

executive action. Here was the matter of the war powers in a surprising

form. However, it was not unknown to Congress. Attempts had been made to

induce Congress to concede the war powers to the President and to ask,

not command, him to use them for the liberation of slaves in the Seceded

States. Long before, in a strangely different connection, such vehement

Abolitionists as Giddings and J. Q. Adams had pictured the freeing of

slaves as a natural incident of military occupation.

What induced Lincoln to throw out this hint of a possible surrender on

the subject of emancipation? Again, as so often, the silence as to his

motives is unbroken. However, there can be no doubt that his thinking

on the subject passed through several successive stages. But all his

thinking was ruled by one idea. Any policy he might accept, or any

refusal of policy, would be judged in his own mind by the degree to

which it helped, or hindered, the national cause. Nothing was more

absurd than the sneer of the Abolitionists that he was "tender" of

slavery. Browning spoke for him faithfully, "If slavery can survive the

shock of war and secession, be it so. If in the conflict for liberty,

the Constitution and the Union, it must necessarily perish, then let it

perish." Browning refused to predict which alternative would develop.

His point was that slaves must be treated like other property. But, if

need be, he would sacrifice slavery as he would sacrifice anything else,

to save the Union. He had no intention to "protect" slavery.(6)

In the first stage of Lincoln's thinking on this thorny subject, his

chief anxiety was to avoid scaring off from the national cause those

Southern Unionists who were not prepared to abandon slavery. This was

the motive behind his prompt suppression of Fremont. It was this that

inspired the Abolitionist sneer about his relative attitude toward

God and Kentucky. As a compromise, to cut the ground from under the

Vindictives, he had urged the loyal Slave States to endorse a program

of compensated emancipation. But these States were as unable to see the

handwriting on the wall as were the Little Men. In the same proclamation

that overruled Hunter, while hinting at what the Administration might

feel driven to do, Lincoln appealed again to the loyal Slave States to

accept compensated emancipation. "I do not argue," said he, "I beseech

you to make the argument for yourselves. You can not, if you would, be

blind to the signs of the times. . . . This proposal makes common cause

for a common object, casting no reproaches upon any. It acts not the

Pharisee. The change it contemplates would come gently as the dews of

heaven, not rending or wrecking anything."(7)

Though Lincoln, at this moment, was anxiously watching the movement

in Congress to force his hand, he was not apparently cast down. He was

emerging from his eclipse. June was approaching and with it the final

dawn. Furthermore, when he issued this proclamation on May nineteenth,

he had not lost faith in McClellan. He was still hoping for news of a

crushing victory; of McClellan's triumphal entry into Richmond. The

next two months embraced both those transformations which together

revolutionized his position. He emerged from his last eclipse; and

McClellan failed him.

When Lincoln returned to Washington after his two days at the front, he

knew that the fortunes of his Administration were at a low ebb.

Never had he been derided in Congress with more brazen injustice. The

Committee, waiting only for McClellan's failure, would now unmask their

guns-as Chandler did, seven days later. The line of Vindictive criticism

could easily be foreshadowed: the government had failed; it was

responsible for a colossal military catastrophe; but what could you

expect of an Administration that would not strike its enemies through

emancipation; what a shattering demonstration that the Executive was not

a safe repository of the war powers.

Was there any way to forestall or disarm the Vindictives? His silence

gives us no clue when or how the answer occurred to him--by separating

the two issues; by carrying out the hint in the May proclamation; by

yielding on emancipation while, in the very act, pushing the war powers

of the President to their limit, declaring slaves free by an executive

order.

The importance of preserving the war power of the President had become

a fixed condition of Lincoln's thought. Already, he was looking forward

not only to victory but to the great task that should come after

victory. He was determined, if it were humanly possible, to keep that

task in the hands of the President, and out of the hands of Congress.

A first step had already been taken. In portions of occupied territory,

military governors had been appointed. Simple as this seemed to the

careless observer, it focussed the whole issue. The powerful, legal mind

of Sumner at once perceived its significance. He denied in the Senate

the right of the President to make such appointments; he besought the

Senate to demand the cancellation of such appointment. He reasserted the

absolute sovereignty of Congress.(8) It would be a far-reaching stroke

if Lincoln, in any way, could extort from Congress acquiescence in his

use of the war powers on a vast scale. Freeing the slaves by executive

order would be such a use.

Lincoln; An Account of his Personal Life, Especially of its Springs of Action as Revealed and Deepened by the Ordeal of War · 第 16 / 30 段