Chapter V.

A Babel of Tongues

The great family of languages.—Few languages in Europe not

belonging to the family.—The dying Celtic languages.—The three

branches of the Germanic family.—The influence of the Latin

tongue on the south of Europe.—The many Slavic peoples.—The map

as divided by kings without regard to peoples and languages.—The

strange mixture in Austria-Hungary.—The southeast of Europe.—The

Greeks and Dacians.—The Roman colonists.—The Slavs.—The

Volgars.—The Skipetars.—A hopeless mixture.

In Chapter II it was pointed out that almost all the peoples of

Europe were related, in one big family of tribes. It is likely

that the forefathers of the Celts, the Latins, the Germans, the

Greeks, and the Slavs belonged to one big tribe which had its

home back in the highlands of Central Asia. As a general rule,

the relationship of peoples to each other can be told by the

languages which they speak. If two tribes are related because

their forefathers once belonged to the same tribe, it is almost

certain that they will show this relationship in their languages.

The language of England a thousand years ago was very much like

the language of the Germans, for the English were originally

German tribes. Even today, it is easy to see that English is a

Germanic language. Take the English words house, father, mother,

brother, water, here, is, etc. The German words which mean the

same are _haus, vater, mutter, bruder, wasser, hier, ist_. It is

very plain that the two languages must have come from the same

source.

There are professors in European colleges who have spent their

whole lives studying this relationship of languages. These men

have proved not only that almost all the languages of Europe are

related, but that the language of the Persians, and that of some

of the old tribes in Hindustan also belong to one great family of

tongues. Let us take the word for mother. In one of the ancient

languages of Hindustan it was _matr_; in the Greek, it was

_mātār_; in the Latin _mater_ (mätār); in the Bohemian

_matka_; in the German _mu̠tter_; in the Spanish mädre; in the

Norwegian _mōder_, etc. This great family of languages is called

“the Indo-European group,” because the tribes which spoke them,

originally inhabitants of Asia, have scattered all over India and

Europe. The only peoples in Europe whose languages do not belong

to it are the Finns and Laplanders of the north, the Basques

(Bȧsks) of the Pyrenees Mountains, the Hungarians, the Gypsies,

and the Turks.

The descendants of the old Celtic peoples have not kept up the

Celtic languages to any great extent. The reason for this is that

first the Romans and then the Germanic tribes conquered most of

the lands where the Celts lived. In this way, Spain, Portugal,

France, and Belgium now talk languages that have grown from the

Latin, the language of Rome. The Celts in the British Isles now

all talk English, because the English, who were a Germanic

people, conquered them and forced them to use their language.

Patriotic Irishmen and Welshmen (who are descendants of the

Celtic tribes) are trying to keep alive the Irish and Welsh

languages, but all of the young people in the British Isles learn

English, and they are generally content to talk only one

language. The other Celtic languages which have existed within

the last one hundred years are the Gaelic of the north of

Scotland, the Breton of western France, and the Cornish of the

southwestern corner of England.

The Germanic languages (sometimes called Teutonic) are found in

three parts of Europe today. The Scandinavian languages, Danish,

Norwegian, and Swedish, belong to this family. Western Austria

and Germany form, with Holland and Western Belgium, a second

group of German-speaking nations. (The people of eastern Belgium

are Celts and talk a kind of French.) The third part of Europe

which uses a Germanic language is England.

In an earlier chapter we learned how the Celts in France, Spain,

and Portugal gave up their own languages and used the Latin.

Latin languages today are found also in the southern and western

parts of Switzerland, all over Italy, and in Roumania.

We learned also about the Slavs who lived to the eastward of the

Germanic tribes. When the Germans moved west, these Slavs

followed them and occupied the lands which had just been left

vacant. In this way, we find Slavic peoples talking Slavic

(sometimes called Slavonic) languages in the parts of Europe to

the east and south of the Germans. More than half of the

inhabitants of Austria-Hungary are Slavs, although the Austrians

proper are a Germanic people, and the Hungarians do not belong to

the Indo-European family at all. The Serbians and Montenegrins

are Slavs. The Poles and Russians are Slavs. The Bulgarians speak

a Slavic language and have some Slavic blood in them, although,

as will be pointed out later, originally they did not belong to

the Slavic family.

[Illustration: Map: Distribution Of Peoples According to Relationship]

The Greeks and Albanians belong to the great Indo-European family

of tribes, but their languages are not closely related to any of

the four great branches.

[Illustration: Distribution Of Languages]

The two maps on pages 65 and 66 are very much alike and yet in

some respects very different. The first shows how Europe is

largely inhabited by peoples of the great Indo-European family.

Those who are descended from the Celts are marked Celtic even

though today they have given up their Celtic language, as have

the Cornish in England and the inhabitants of Spain, France,

eastern Belgium, and the greater part of Ireland. The Bulgarians

are marked as not belonging to the great family, although they

speak a Slavic language.

In the second map, the distribution of languages is shown. You

will notice that the Celtic languages are found only in small

parts of the British Isles, and in the westernmost point of

France. The Bulgarians are here marked Slavic because their

language belongs to that branch. One of the most curious things

about the two maps is the presence of little spots like islands,

particularly made up of German-speaking peoples. There are

several of these little islands in Russia. They have been there

for nearly two hundred years. A traveler crossing the southern

part of Russia is astonished to find districts as large as an

American county where not a word of Russian is spoken. The people

are all of Germanic blood, although they live under the

government of Russia. In the same way, there is a large German

island in the midst of the Roumanians in Transylvania and another

between the Slovaks and Poles at the foot of the Carpathian

Mountains. There is a large Hungarian island in Transylvania

also, entirely surrounded by Germans and Roumanians. The table on

the opposite page shows the main branches of the Indo-European

family that are found in Europe.

The Indo-European Family of Languages

(_a_) Hindu branch

(_b_) Persian branch

(_c_) Celtic branch

Gāe′lic (northern Scotland) Welsh Cornish (dead)

Erse (Irish) Brē′ton (western France)

(_d_) Latin branch

Portuguese Spanish French Romansh (southeastern Switzerland)

Italian Roumanian

(_e_) Germanic branch

Norwegian Danish Swedish Dutch Flemish (Belgium)

Low German High German English

(_f_) Slavonic branch

Russian Polish Lettish Lithuanian Old Prussian (dead) Czech

(Bohemian [pronounced Chĕck]) Slō vak′ (northern Hungary)

Serbian Bulgarian Slove′nian (southwestern Austria)

Crōa′tian (southern Austria)

Ruthē′nian (northeastern Austria-Hungary, and southwestern

Russia)

} } Baltic states of Russia }

(_g_) Greek

(_h_) Albā′nian

The main source of the present trouble in Europe is that kings

and their ministers and generals, like their ancestors, the

feudal lords, never considered the wishes of the people when they

changed the boundaries of kingdoms. Austria-Hungary is a good

example. The Austrians and Hungarians were two very different

peoples. They had nothing in common and did not wish to be joined

under one ruler, but a king of Hungary, dying, left no son to

succeed him, and his only daughter was married to the archduke of

Austria. This archduke of Austria (a descendant of the counts of

Hapsburg) was also emperor of Germany and king of Bohemia,

although the Bohemian people had not chosen him as their ruler.

The Hungarians, before their union with Austria, had conquered

certain Slavic tribes and part of the Roumanians. Later Austria

annexed part of Poland. In this way, the empire became a jumble

of languages and nationalities. When its congress is called

together, the official announcement is read in eleven different

languages. Forty-one different dialects are talked in an area not

as large as that of the state of Texas.

We must remember that besides the literary or written languages

of each country there are several spoken dialects. A man from

Devonshire, England, meeting a man from Yorkshire in the north of

the same country, has difficulty in understanding many words in

his speech. The language of the south of Scotland also is

English, although it is very different from the English that we

in America are taught. A Frenchman from the Pyrenees Mountains

was taught in school to speak and read the French language as we

find it in books. Yet besides this, he knows a dialect that is

talked by the country people around him, that can not be

understood by the peasants from the north of France near the

Flemish border. The man who lives in the east of France can

understand the dialect of the Italians from the west of Italy

much better than he can that of the Frenchman from the Atlantic

coast.

In America, with people moving around from place to place by

means of stage coach, steamboat, and railroad, there has been no

great chance to develop dialects, although we can instantly tell

the New Englander, the southerner, or the westerner by his

speech. It should be remembered that in Europe, for centuries,

the people were kept on their own farms or in their own towns.

The result of this was that each little village or city has its

own peculiar language. It is said that persons who have studied

such language matters carefully, after conversing with a man from

Europe, can tell within thirty miles where his home used to be in

the old country. There are no sharply marked boundaries of

languages. The dialects of France shade off into those of Spain

on the one hand and into those of the Flemish and the Italian on

the other.

[Illustration: Southeastern Europe, 600 B.C.]

The British Isles furnish us with four or five different

nationalities. The people of the north of Ireland are really

lowland Scotch of Germanic descent, while the other three-fourths

of Ireland is inhabited by Celts. To make the difference all the

greater, the Celts are almost universally Catholics, while the

Scotch-Irish are Protestants. The people of the north of Scotland

are Gaels, a Celtic race having no connection in language or

blood with the people of the southern half of that country. The

Welsh are a Celtic people, having no relationship with the

English, who are a Germanic people. The Welsh and the Cornish of

Cornwall and the people of highland Scotland are the descendants

of the ancient Britons and Gaels who inhabited the island when

Julius Caesar and the Romans first landed there. Then five

hundred years afterwards, as has already been told, came great

swarms of Germans (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes), who drove the

Britons to the west and north, and settled the country now known

as England. After these, you will recall, came a number of Danes,

another Germanic people, who settled the east coast of England.

Two hundred years later, the Normans came from France. These

Normans had been living in France for a century or two, but had

come originally from Norway. Normans, Danes, Angles, and Saxons

all mixed to make the modern English. Together, they fought the

Scotch, the Welsh and the Irish, and having conquered them,

oppressed them harshly for many centuries.

[Illustration: Southeastern Europe, 975 A.D.]

But it is in the southeastern corner of Europe that one finds the

worst jumble of nationalities. Six hundred years before Christ,

the Greeks and their rougher cousins, the Thracians, Macedonians,

and Dacians inhabited this district. When one of the Roman

Emperors conquered the Dacians about 100 A.D., he planted a large

Roman colony north of the Danube River. Then came the West Goths,

who swept into this country, but soon left it for the west of

Europe. Next came the Slavic tribes who are the ancestors of the

modern Serbs. Following these, came a large tribe which did not

belong to the Indo-European family, but was distantly related to

the Finns and the Turks. These people were called the Volgars,

for they came from the country around the River Volga. Before

long, we find them called the Bulgars. (The letters B and V are

often interchanged in the languages of south-eastern Europe. The

people of western Europe used to call the country of the Serbs

Servia, but the Serbs objected, saying that the word _servio_, in

Latin, means “to be a slave,” and that as they were not slaves,

they wanted their country to be called by its true name, Serbia.

The Greeks, on the other hand, pronounce the letter B as though

it were V.)

A strange thing happened to the Volgars or Bulgars. They

completely gave up their Asiatic language and adopted a new one,

which became in time the purest of the Slavic tongues. They

intermarried with the Slavs around them and adopted Slavic names.

They founded a flourishing nation which lay between the kingdom

of Serbia and the Greek Empire of Constantinople.

North of the Bulgars lay the country of the Roumani (ro͞o

mä′nï). These people claimed to be descended from the Roman

Emperor’s colonists, as was previously told, but the reason their

language is so much like the Italian is that a large number of

people from the north of Italy moved into the country nearly a

thousand years after the first Roman colonists settled there.

From 900 to 1300 A.D., south-eastern Europe was inhabited by

Serbians, Bulgarians, Roumanians, and Greeks.

[Illustration: A Typical Bulgarian Family]

A fifth people perhaps ought to be counted here, the Albanians.

(See map) This tribe is descended from the Illyrians, who

inhabited the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea even before the

time of the Roman Empire. Their language, like the Greek, is a

branch of the Indo-European family which is neither Latin,

Celtic, Germanic, nor Slavic. They are distant cousins of the

Italians and are also slightly related to the Greeks. They are a

wild, fierce, uncivilized people, and have never known the

meaning of law and order. Robbery and warfare are common. Each

village is always fighting with the people of the neighboring

towns. The Albanians, or Skipetars (skïp′ĕtars) as they call

themselves, were Christians until they were conquered by the

Turks about 1460. Since that time, the great majority of them

have been staunch believers in the Mohammedan religion.

Questions for Review

Where did the great Indo-European family of languages have

its beginning?

Why is it that the Celtic languages are dying out?

What killed the Celtic languages in Spain and France?

What are the three parts of Europe where Germanic languages

are spoken?

In what parts of Europe are languages spoken which are

descended from the Latin?

Explain the presence in Austria-Hungary of eleven different

peoples?

Are the Bulgarians really a Slavic people?

The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of Europe · 第 5 / 26 章