THE PROROGATION OF THE ANTI-REFORM PARLIAMENT (1831).[5]

=Source.=--Molesworthy's _History of the Reform Bill_, London,

1866, p. 185.

Under these circumstances, ministers acted with promptitude and

decision. Their defeat had occurred on the morning of the 22nd of

April; on the same day summonses were issued, calling a Cabinet

Council at St. James's Palace. So short was the notice, that

the ministers were unable to attend, as was customary on such

occasions, in their court dresses.

At this council it was unanimously resolved that Parliament should

be prorogued the same day, with a view to its speedy dissolution,

and the royal speech, which had been prepared for the occasion,

was considered and adopted. All necessary arrangements having been

made, in order to take away from the King all pretext for delay,

Earl Grey and Lord Brougham were deputed to wait on the King, and

communicate to him the advice of the Cabinet. From what has been

already said, the reader will be prepared to anticipate that this

advice was far from palatable. The unusual haste with which it

was proposed to carry out that measure, naturally increased the

King's known objections to the proposed step, and furnished him

with a good excuse for refusing his assent to it. Earl Grey, the

pink and pattern of loyalty and chivalrous courtesy, shrunk from

the disagreeable errand, and requested his bolder and less courtly

colleague to introduce the subject, begging him at the same time to

manage the susceptibility of the King as much as possible.

The Chancellor accordingly approached the subject very carefully,

prefacing the disagreeable message with which he was charged, with

a compliment on the King's desire to promote the welfare of his

people. He then proceeded to communicate the advice of the Cabinet,

adding, that they were unanimous in offering it.

"What!" exclaimed the King, "would you have me dismiss in this

summary manner a Parliament which has granted me so splendid a

civil list, and given my Queen so liberal an annuity in case she

survives me?"

"No doubt, sire," Lord Brougham replied, "in these respects they

have acted wisely and honourably, but your Majesty's advisers are

all of opinion, that in the present state of affairs, every hour

that this Parliament continues to sit is pregnant with danger to

the peace and security of your kingdom, and they humbly beseech

your Majesty to go down this very day and prorogue it. If you do

not, they cannot be answerable for the consequences."

The King was greatly embarrassed; he evidently entertained the

strongest objection to the proposed measure, but he also felt the

danger which would result from the resignation of his ministers at

the present crisis. He therefore shifted his ground, and asked:

"Who is to carry the sword of state and the cap of maintenance?"

"Sire, knowing the urgency of the crisis and the imminent peril in

which the country at this moment stands, we have ventured to tell

those whose duty it is to perform these and other similar offices,

to hold themselves in readiness."

"But the troops, the life guards, I have given no orders for them

to be called out, and now it is too late."

This was indeed a serious objection, for to call out the guards was

the special prerogative of the monarch himself, and no minister

had any right to order their attendance without his express command.

"Sire," replied the Chancellor, with some hesitation, "we must

throw ourselves on your indulgence. Deeply feeling the gravity of

the crisis, and knowing your love for your people, we have taken

a liberty which nothing but the most imperious necessity could

warrant; we have ordered out the troops, and we humbly throw

ourselves on your Majesty's indulgence."

The King's eye flashed and his cheeks became crimson. He was

evidently on the point of dismissing the ministry in an explosion

of anger. "Why, my lords," he exclaimed, "this is treason! _high_

treason, and you, my Lord Chancellor, ought to know that it is."

"Yes, sire, I do know it, and nothing but the strongest conviction

that your Majesty's crown and the interests of the nation are at

stake, could have induced us to take such a step, or to tender the

advice we are now giving."

This submissive reply had the desired effect, the King cooled,

his prudence and better genius prevailed, and having once made

up his mind to yield with a good grace, he accepted, without any

objection, the speech which had been prepared for him, and which

the two ministers had brought with them, he gave orders respecting

the details of the approaching ceremonial, and having completely

recovered his habitual serenity and good humour, he dismissed the

two lords with a jocose threat of impeachment.

At half-past two o'clock the King entered his state carriage. It

was remarked that the guards on this occasion rode wide of it,

as if they attended as a matter of state and ceremony, and not

as being needed for the King's protection. Persons wishing to

make a more open demonstration of their feelings, were allowed

to pass between the soldiers and approach the royal carriage.

One of these, a rough sailor-like person, pulled off his hat,

and waving it around his head, shouted lustily, "Turn out the

rogues, your Majesty." Notwithstanding the suddenness with which

the resolution to dissolve had been taken, the news had already

spread through the metropolis, an immense crowd was assembled, and

the King was greeted throughout his whole progress with the most

enthusiastic shouts. He was exceedingly fond of popularity, and

these acclamations helped to reconcile him to the step he had been

compelled to take, and to efface the unpleasant impression which

the scene which had so recently occurred could not fail to leave

behind it.

Meanwhile, another scene of a far more violent kind was taking

place in the House of Lords. The Chancellor on leaving the King

went down to the House to hear appeals. Having gone through the

cause list he retired, in the hope that he should thereby prevent

Lord Wharncliffe from bringing forward his motion. But the

opposition lords had mustered in great force, and the House was

full in all parts. It is usual on the occasion of a prorogation

by the sovereign, for the peers to appear in their robes, and

most of those present wore theirs, but owing to the precipitation

with which the dissolution had been decided on, several peers,

especially on the opposition side of the House, were without them.

A large number of peeresses in full dress, and of members of the

House of Commons were also present. And now a struggle commenced

between the two parties into which the House was divided. The

object of the opposition was to press Lord Wharncliffe's motion

before the King's arrival; the supporters of the ministry wished to

prevent it from being passed. The firing of the park guns announced

that the King was already on his way down to the House, and told

the opposition they had no time to lose. On the motion of Lord

Mansfield, the Earl of Shaftesbury presided, in the absence of the

Lord Chancellor.

The Duke of Richmond, in order to baffle the opposition, moved

that the standing order which required their lordships to take

their places should be enforced. The opposition saw at once

that this motion was made for the sake of delay, and angrily

protested against it; whereupon the duke threatened to call for

the enforcement of two other standing orders which prohibited the

use of intemperate and threatening language in the House. Lord

Londonderry, furious with indignation, broke out into a vehement

tirade against the conduct of the ministry, and thus effectually

played the game of his opponents. So violent was the excitement

which prevailed at this time in the House, that the ladies present

were terrified, thinking that the peers would actually come to

blows. At length Lord Londonderry was persuaded to sit down, and

Lord Wharncliffe obtained a hearing. But it was too late to press

his motion, and he contented himself with reading it, in order that

it might be entered on the journals of the House.

At this conjuncture, the Lord Chancellor returned, and the moment

the reading of the address was concluded, he exclaimed in a

vehement and emphatic tone:

"My lords, I have never yet heard it doubted that the King

possessed the prerogative of dissolving Parliament at pleasure,

still less have I ever known a doubt to exist on the subject at

a moment when the lower House have thought fit to refuse the

supplies." Scarcely had he uttered these words when he was summoned

to meet the King, who had just arrived and was in the robing room;

he at once quitted the House which resounded on all sides with

cries of "hear" and "the King."

The tumult having in some degree subsided, Lord Mansfield addressed

the House, regretting the scene which had just occurred, and

condemning the dissolution, which he qualified as an act by which

the ministers were making the sovereign the instrument of his own

destruction.

He was interrupted by another storm of violence and confusion,

which was at length appeased by the announcement that the King was

at hand. When he entered, the assembly had recovered its usual calm

and decorous tranquillity. The members of the House of Commons

having been summoned to the bar, the King, in a loud and firm

voice, pronounced his speech, which commenced with the following

words:

"My lords and gentlemen,

"I have come to meet you for the purpose of proroguing this

Parliament, with a view to its immediate dissolution.

"I have been induced to resort to this measure for the purpose

of ascertaining the sense of my people, in the way in which it

can be most constitutionally and authentically expressed, on

the expediency of making such changes in the representation as

circumstances may appear to require, and which, founded on the

acknowledged principles of the constitution, may tend at once to

uphold the just rights and prerogatives of the crown, and to give

security to the liberties of the people."

Peace and Reform (1815-1837) · 第 73 / 86 题