HISTORY.

Inca conquest.

Chile was the recognized name of the country from the beginning of its

known history. The land was originally inhabited by tribes of Indians,

who, though not mere savages, were far below the level of civilization

distinguishing the races of Mexico and Peru. When the country first

became known to the Spaniards in the 16th century the northern tribes

were found to be more civilized and much more submissive than those of

the south. The difference was no doubt due to the invasion and conquest

of northern Chile in the 15th century by Yupanqui, Inca of Peru,

grandfather of Atahualpa, ruler of Peru at the time of its conquest by

Pizarro. The dominion of the Incas in Chile was probably bounded by the

Rapel river (lat. 34 deg. 10' S.), and, though their control of the country

was slight, the Peruvian influence led to the introduction of a higher

civilization, and, by weakening the power of the tribes, paved the way

for the invasion of the Spaniards. Beyond the limits of the Inca

conquest the Indians of Chile were distinguished by fierce independence

of character and by their warlike qualities. Rude and ignorant as they

were, they possessed a rough military organization; each community was

led by its _ulmen_ (chief), and in war the tribes fought together under

an elected leader (_toqui_). The name of the Araucanians, the most

powerful of the tribes, came to be applied to the whole confederation of

Indians living south of the Bio-bio river.

Spanish invasions.

The first Spanish invasion of Chile took place in 1535, when Diego de

Almagro, the companion and rival of Pizarro in the conquest of Peru,

marched into Chile in search of gold. Disappointed in his quest, and

meeting with obstinate resistance from the southern tribes, he returned

to Peru with his whole force in 1538. In 1540 Pizarro sent Pedro de

Valdivia to make a regular conquest and settlement of Chile. Valdivia

founded Santiago, the present capital of Chile, in February 1541, and

proceeded to build the towns of La Serena, Conception, Villarica,

Imperial, Valdivia and Angol, in order to secure his hold on the

country. But the Indians fought desperately for their independence, and

in 1553 a general rising of the tribes ended in the defeat and death of

Valdivia and in the destruction of most of his settlements. This was the

beginning of nearly a century of continuous warfare. As there was no

gold in the country the number of settlers was small, the loose tribal

organization of the natives made it impossible to inflict a vital defeat

on them, and the mountainous and thickly wooded country lent itself

admirably to a warfare of surprises and ambuscades. General after

general and army after army were despatched from Spain and Peru; Chile

was given a government independent of the viceroy of Lima; attack after

attack was made on the Indians, their lands were laid waste, and the

struggle was conducted with merciless ferocity: all in vain. Settlements

and forts were never free from assault and were taken and retaken; if

one Indian army was destroyed another took its place, if one _toqui_ was

killed another was chosen; when defeated, the Indians retired to their

forests, marshes and hills, recruited their forces, and fell on the

pursuing Spaniards. In 1612 an attempt was made by a Jesuit missionary

to negotiate a peace, but not till 1640 was the desperate struggle ended

by the treaty of Quillin, which left the Indians all the land south of

the Bio-bio river. Up to 1800 the peace was broken by three wars, in

1655, in 1723 and in 1766, the last ended by a treaty which actually

gave the Araucanians the right to have a minister at Santiago.

Colonial system.

It was this constant warfare with the Indians and the necessity for hard

continuous work, owing to the lack of precious metals in Chile, that no

doubt helped to produce in the settlers the strength and hardihood of

character that distinguishes the Chileans among South American races.

But not unnaturally the material condition of the country was the

reverse of prosperous. The expenditure far exceeded the revenue. The

Indian warfare occupied nearly the whole attention of the governors and

much of the time of the settlers. By the Spanish colonial system the

development of manufactures was prohibited and the trade of the colony

was limited not only to Spain but to the one port of Cadiz. Till the

18th century ships were not allowed to sail round Cape Horn, so that the

Chileans had to trade indirectly through Peru and the Argentine.

Agriculture was the one resource of the colony, and wheat was grown for

export to Peru, but the land was concentrated in the hands of a few big

landowners, and the cultivation of the vine and olive was forbidden. At

the end of the 17th century Santiago was a town of poor one-storeyed

houses and had only 8000 inhabitants; the other towns, Valparaiso,

Concepcion, La Serena, were only large villages. Books were not allowed

to be imported, and education was limited to such as was given here and

there by priests and monks. The Indians within the limits of the Spanish

colony were treated like slaves, and horribly mutilated to prevent their

escape; but at the same time a gradual fusion of races was taking place,

and the Chilean peasant (_peon_) of to-day is as much of Indian as of

Spanish descent. The Araucanians, however, continued to preserve their

independence; they jealously resented the introduction of Spanish

influence, and the missionary efforts of the Jesuits met with little

success.

During the 18th century the condition of the colony was improved in many

ways. The Bourbon kings of Spain were more liberal in their colonial

policy. Merchant-ships were allowed to sail direct to Chile, trade with

France was sometimes permitted, and a large batch of hardy emigrants was

sent out from the Biscay provinces of Spain. Freed from the

preoccupation of the Indian wars, the governors gave more attention to

the general welfare of the country: a university was started in Santiago

in 1747, many towns were built about the same time, agriculture and

industries were promoted and a coasting trade grew up. In 1778 Charles

III. threw open all the ports of Spain to the colonies and allowed

freedom of trade with France. But in general the administration of the

colony was burdensome, oppressive and inefficient. The people had no

voice in the government. Ruling with the help of the Royal Audience, the

governor was absolute master of the country, and regulated the smallest

details of life. Such time as the officials could spare from the main

object of enriching themselves by extortion and corruption was given up

to endless official and religious ceremonies and to petty disputes of

etiquette and precedence. All the high posts and offices were filled by

men sent from Spain, with the result that bitter jealousy reigned

between them and the native-born colonists (_criollos_). The _criollos_

as a rule filled the posts in the municipalities (_cabildos_), disposed

of by sale, so that when the revolution broke out the _cabildos_

naturally became the centres of the movement. As in all Spanish

colonies, so in Chile, the Church played a large part in the public

life. Chile was divided into the two bishoprics of Santiago and

Concepcion, and the Church managed to accumulate most of the wealth of

the country. At the same time the monks and Jesuits did useful work in

teaching industrial and agricultural arts, and in giving the people a

certain degree of education; but the influence of the Church was used to

bolster up the traditional narrow colonial system, and the constant

quarrels between the clergy and the secular powers often threw the

country into confusion.

At the opening of the 19th century Chile was a colony whose resources

had hardly been touched, with a population of about 500,000 persons, of

Spanish and mixed Spanish and Indian blood: a people endowed with the

vigour of character bred by a mountainous country and a bracing climate

and by a hard struggle for existence, but ignorant through lack of

education, shut out by a narrow-minded commercial system from knowledge

of the outside world, and destitute of the character-training that free

institutions afford.

Struggle for independence.

The national independence of Chile dates from the second decade of the

19th century. The revolt of England's North American colonies, and the

events of the French Revolution naturally suggested the idea of a

struggle for independence to the Spanish colonists, and the deposition

of Ferdinand VII. by Napoleon, and the ensuing disorganization of Spain,

supplied the desired opportunity. In 1809 risings took place in

Venezuela, in Ecuador, in Upper Peru and in the Argentine; the

revolutionary fever spread to Chile, and on the 18th of September 1810

the _cabildo_ of Santiago secured the resignation of the governor and

vested his powers in an elected _Junta_ (board) of seven members. This

event was the beginning of the independence of Chile. But it was some

time before independence was fully attained. The mass of the people were

ignorant, intercourse between them was slight, and there was a strong

section attached to the old regime. The party determined on independence

was at first small, and compelled to conceal its aims till the ground

had been prepared for open decisive action. Further, there were

divisions between the patriots of Santiago and those of Concepcion, and

bitter jealousies between the leaders, the chief of whom were Juan

Martinez de Rozas, Jose Miguel Carrera and Bernardo O'Higgins. Owing to

the apathy of the people and the enmities existing among the leaders,

the Spanish forces, sent by the viceroy of Peru to crush the

revolutionary movement, succeeded after two years' indecisive fighting

in completely defeating the patriots at Rancagua in 1814. For three

years the Spaniards maintained their hold on Chile, ruling the country

with tyrannical harshness, but in the spring of 1817 a patriot force

which had been organized at Mendoza in the Argentine by Jose de San

Martin, an Argentine officer, and by O'Higgins, crossed the Andes and

overwhelmed the royalists at the battle of Chacabuco. O'Higgins was

named director-general of Chile, while San Martin, realizing that the

independence of each colony depended on the Spanish being expelled from

the whole of South America, set about preparing an invasion of Peru. The

viceroy of Lima made one more effort to uphold the power of Spain in

Chile, but the army he despatched under Mariano Osorio, the victor of

Rancagua, was decisively defeated at the river Maipo on the 3rd of April

1818. By this battle the independence of Chile, formally proclaimed by

O'Higgins in the previous February, was finally secured.

The republic.

The next few years witnessed the expulsion of the royalists from the

south of Chile, the equipment of a small fleet, placed under the command

of Manuel Blanco Encalada and Lord Cochrane (earl of Dundonald), and the

invasion of Peru by San Martin with the help of the fleet, ending in the

proclamation of Peruvian independence in 1821; though the Spanish power

was not finally broken until Bolivar's victory at Ayacucho in 1824.

Relieved from all fear of Spanish attacks from the north, the new

republic of Chile entered upon a period of internal confusion and

dissension bordering upon anarchy. As soon as the necessity for

establishing a stable government arose the lack of training in

self-government among the Chileans became painfully obvious. O'Higgins

as director-general, rightly perhaps, considered that firm orderly

government was more important than the concession of liberal

institutions, but his administration roused strong hostility, and in

1823 he was compelled to resign. From that date up to 1830 there were no

less than ten governments, while three different constitutions were

proclaimed. The nation was divided into small mutually hostile parties;

there were ecclesiastical troubles owing to the hostility of the Church

to the new republic; there were Indian risings in the south and royalist

revolts in the island of Chiloe; the expenditure exceeded the revenue,

and the employment of the old Spanish financial expedients naturally

increased the general discontent. Up to 1830 the Liberal party, which

favoured a free democratic regime, held the upper hand, but in that year

the Conservatives, backed by a military rising led by General Joaquin

Prieto, placed themselves in power after a sanguinary battle at Lircay.

Prieto was elected president in 1831, and a new constitution was drafted

and promulgated in 1833, which, with some modifications, remains the

constitution of Chile at the present time. This constitution invested

the executive with almost dictatorial powers, and the Conservatives

entered upon a long term of office.

The aim of the Conservative policy was to secure above all a strong

administration; power was concentrated in the hands of a small circle;

public liberties were restricted and all opposition crushed by force.

Inaugurated under General Prieto's administration (1831-1841) by his

able minister Diego Portales, this policy was continued by his

successors General Manuel Bulnes (1841-1851) and Manuel Montt

(1851-1861), each of whom like Prieto was elected to a double term of

office. In spite of the discontent of the Liberals, the Conservative

ascendancy secured a long period of firm stable government, which was

essential to put an end to the confusion in public life and to give time

for the people to awake to a fuller realization of the duties and

responsibilities of national independence. The internal peace of the

country was only disturbed three times, by Liberal risings in 1835, in

1851 and in 1859, all of which were crushed, but not without severe

fighting. In 1836 Chile also became involved in a war with a

confederation of Peru and Bolivia, which ended in the victory of Chile

and the dissolution of the confederation.

While refusing to allow the people any share in, or control over, the

government, the Conservative leaders devoted themselves to improving the

condition of the people and of the country, and under their firm rule

Chile advanced rapidly in prosperity. The government established a

department for education, a training college for teachers, and numerous

schools and libraries; literary magazines were started and a school of

art and an academy of music founded. By the consolidation of the foreign

debt, by the regular payment of interest, by the establishment of

several banks, and by the negotiation of commercial treaties, the

financial position of the country was improved. Internal development was

promoted by the working of the silver mines of Copiapo and the coal

mines of Lota, by the building of railways and erection of telegraphs,

and by the colonization of the rich Valdivia province with German

settlers.

The Straits of Magellan were occupied; under an American engineer,

William Wheelwright, a line of steamers was started on the coast, and,

by a wise measure allowing merchandise to be landed free of duty for

re-exportation, Valparaiso became a busy port and trading centre; while

the demand for food-stuffs in California and Australia, following upon

the rush for gold, gave a strong impetus to agriculture. A code of law

was drawn up and promulgated, and the ecclesiastical system was

organized under an archbishop appointed by the pope. To Montt, as

minister under Bulnes and afterwards as president, must be given the

main credit for the far-seeing policy which laid the foundations of the

prosperity of Chile; and though the administration was in many ways

harsh and narrow, firm government, rather than liberty that would have

tended to anarchy, was essential for the success of the young republic.

After 1861, however, a Liberal reaction set in, aided by divisions in

the Conservative party arising mainly over church questions. Montt's

successors, Jose Joaquin Perez (1861-1871), Federico Errazuriz

(1871-1876) and Anibal Pinto (1876-1881), abandoned the repressive

policy of their predecessors, invited the co-operation of the Liberals,

and allowed discontent to vent itself freely in popular agitation. Some

democratic changes were made in the constitution, notably a law

forbidding the re-election of a president, and the gradual and peaceful

transition to a Liberal policy was a proof of the progress which the

nation had made in political training. Outside the movement for

constitutional reform, the most important internal question was the

successful Liberal attack on the privileged position and narrow views of

the Church, which led to the birth of a strong ultra-montane party among

the clergy. The government continued to be animated by a progressive

spirit: schools, railways, telegraphs were rapidly extended; a steamship

mail service to Europe was subsidized, and the stability of the

government enabled it to raise new foreign loans in order to extinguish

the old high interest-bearing loans and to meet the expenses of public

works. In 1877 a financial crisis occurred, met by the emission of paper

money, but the depression was only temporary, and the country soon

rallied from the effects.

During this period there was desultory fighting with the Indians; there

was a long boundary dispute with the Argentine, settled in 1880; and in

1865 Chilean sympathy with Peru in a quarrel with Spain led to a foolish

war with Spain. The blockade of their ports and the bombardment of

Valparaiso by a Spanish squadron impressed the Chileans with the

necessity of possessing an adequate fleet to defend their long

coast-line; and it was under President Errazuriz that the ships were

obtained and the officers trained that did such good service in the

great war with Peru. With a population of over two millions, a rapidly

increasing revenue, ruled by a government that was firm and progressive

and that enjoyed the confidence of all classes, Chile was well equipped

for the struggle with Peru that began in 1879.

Close of the war with Peru.

The war of 1879-82 between Chile and Peru is the subject of a separate

article (see CHILE-PERUVIAN WAR). By the beginning of 1881 the war had

reached a stage when the final struggle was close at hand. On the 13th

of January of that year the Chilean forces under command of General

Baquedano attacked the entrenched positions of the Peruvians at daybreak

in the vicinity of Chorillos, a village some few miles from Lima, and

forming the outer line of defence for the capital. After a stubborn

fight the day ended in victory for the attacking forces; but the losses

on both sides were great, and on the following day negotiations for

peace were attempted by the representatives of the foreign powers in

Lima, the object being to avoid, if possible, any further bloodshed.

This attempt to end the conflict proved, however, abortive, and on the

15th of January at 2 P.M. hostilities recommenced in the neighbourhood

of Miraflores. After severe fighting for some four hours the Chileans

again proved victorious, and drove the Peruvians from the second line of

defence back upon the city of Lima. Lima was now at the mercy of the

Chileans, and on the 17th of January a division of 4000 men of all arms,

under the command of General Cornelio Saavedra, was sent forward to

occupy the Peruvian capital and restore order within the town limits. A

portion of the Chilean forces was shortly afterwards withdrawn from

Peru, and the army of occupation remaining in the conquered country was

in charge of Admiral Patricio Lynch, an officer who had been specially

promoted for distinguished services during the war. President Anibal

Pinto of Chile now set about to find means to conclude a treaty of peace

with Peru, but his efforts in this direction were frustrated by the

armed resistance offered in the country districts to the Chilean

authorities by the remainder of the Peruvian forces under command of

General Caceres. So matters continued--the Chileans administering on the

seaboard and in the principal towns, the Peruvians maintaining a

guerilla warfare in the mountainous districts of the interior. In

September 1881 the term of office of president Pinto expired, and he was

succeeded in the post of chief executive of Chile by President Domingo

Santa Maria. Ex-President Pinto died three years later in Valparaiso,

leaving a memory respected and admired by all political parties in his

country. The name of Pinto will always occupy a prominent place in the

annals of Chilean history, not only because the war with Peru took place

during his term of office, but also on account of the fact that it was

largely due to the intelligent direction of all details by the president

during the struggle that the Chilean arms proved so absolutely

successful by land and sea.

President Santa Maria.

Senor Domingo Santa Maria, who now acceded to the presidency of Chile,

was a Liberal in politics, and had previously held various important

posts under the government. Under the rule of President Montt he had

been an active member of the opposition and involved in various

revolutionary conspiracies; for his participation in these plots he was

at one time exiled from the country, but returned and received official

employment under President Perez. The principal task confronting

President Santa Maria on assuming the presidency was to negotiate a

treaty of peace with Peru and provide for the evacuation of the Chilean

army of occupation. The presence of the Peruvian general Caceres and his

forces in the interior of Peru prevented for some two years the

formation of any Peruvian national administration in Lima with which the

Chilean authorities could deal. In August of 1883 the Peruvians were

defeated by the forces commanded by Admiral Lynch, and a government was

then organized under the leadership of General Iglesias. A provisional

treaty of peace was then drawn up and signed by General Iglesias and the

Chilean representative, and this was finally ratified by the Chilean and

Peruvian congresses respectively in April 1884. By the terms of this

treaty Peru ceded to Chile unconditionally the province of Tarapaca, and

the provinces of Tacna and Arica were placed under Chilean authority for

the term of ten years, the inhabitants having then to decide by a

general vote whether they remained a part of Chile or elected to belong

once more to Peru. In the event of the decision being favourable to Peru

a sum of 10,000,000 dollars was to be paid by Peru to Chile. On the

ratification of this treaty the Chilean forces were immediately

withdrawn from Lima and other points of occupation in Peruvian

territory. The government of Bolivia also attempted to negotiate a

treaty of peace with Chile in 1884, and for this purpose sent

representatives to Santiago. No satisfactory terms, however, could be

arranged, and the negotiations ended in only an armistice being agreed

to, by which Chile remained in occupation of the Bolivian seaboard

pending a definite settlement at some future period.

The administration of President Santa Maria met with violent opposition

from the Conservatives, who included the Clerical party in their ranks,

and also from a certain section of the Liberals. The dislike of the

Conservatives to President Santa Maria was occasioned by his

introduction of the law of civil marriage, the civil registration of

births and deaths, and the freeing of the cemeteries. Hitherto no

marriage was legal unless celebrated according to the rites of the

Roman Catholic religion, and all registers of births and deaths were

kept by the parish priests. Civil employees were now appointed under the

new laws to attend to this work. Formerly the cemeteries were entirely

under the control of the Church, and, with the exception of a few places

specially created for the purpose, were reserved solely for the burial

of Roman Catholics. Under the new regime these cemeteries were made

common to the dead of all religions. Under President Perez, in 1865, a

clause in the law of constitution had been introduced permitting the

exercise of all creeds of religion, and this was now put into practice,

all restrictions being removed. On several occasions, notably in 1882

and 1885, President Santa Maria used his influence in the elections of

senators and deputies to congress for the purpose of creating a

substantial majority in his favour. He was induced to take this course

in consequence of the violent opposition raised in the chambers by the

liberal policy he pursued in connexion with Church matters. This

intervention caused great irritation amongst the Conservatives and

dissentient Liberals, and the political situation on more than one

occasion became so strained as to bring the country to the verge of

armed revolution. No outbreak, however, took place, and in 1886 the five

years of office for which President Santa Maria had been elected came to

an end, and another Liberal, Senor Jose Manuel Balmaceda, then succeeded

to power.

Balmaceda elected president.

Revolution of 1891.

The election of Balmaceda was bitterly opposed by the Conservatives and

dissentient Liberals, but was finally successfully carried by the

official influence exercised by President Santa Maria. On assuming

office President Balmaceda endeavoured to bring about a reconciliation

of all sections of the Liberal party in congress and so form a solid

majority to support the administration, and to this end he nominated as

ministers representatives of the different political groups. Six months

later the cabinet was reorganized, and two most bitter opponents to the

recent election of President Balmaceda were accorded portfolios.

Believing that he had now secured the support of the majority in

congress on behalf of any measures he decided to put forward, the new

president initiated a policy of heavy expenditure on public works, the

building of schools, and the strengthening of the naval and military

forces of the republic. Contracts were given out to the value of

L6,000,000 for the construction of railways in the southern districts;

some 10,000,000 dollars were expended in the erection of schools and

colleges; three cruisers and two sea-going torpedo boats were added to

the squadron; the construction of the naval port at Talcahuano was

actively pushed forward; new armament was purchased for the infantry and

artillery branches of the army, and heavy guns were acquired for the

purpose of permanently and strongly fortifying the neighbourhoods of

Valparaiso, Talcahuano and Iquique. In itself this policy was not

unreasonable, and in many ways extremely beneficial for the country.

Unfortunately corruption crept into the expenditure of the large sums

necessary to carry out this programme. Contracts were given by favour

and not by merit, and the progress made in the construction of the new

public works was far from satisfactory. The opposition in congress to

President Balmaceda began to increase rapidly towards the close of 1887,

and further gained ground in 1888. In order to ensure a majority

favourable to his views, the president threw the whole weight of his

official influence into the elections for senators and deputies in 1888;

but many of the members returned to the chambers through this official

influence joined the opposition shortly after taking their seats. In

1889 congress became distinctly hostile to the administration of

President Balmaceda, and the political situation became grave, and at

times threatened to involve the country in civil war. According to usage

and custom in Chile, a ministry does not remain in office unless

supported by a majority in the chambers. Balmaceda now found himself in

the impossible position of being unable to appoint any ministry that

could control a majority in the senate and chamber of deputies and at

the same time be in accordance with his own views of the administration

of public affairs. At this juncture the president assumed that the

constitution gave him the power of nominating and maintaining in office

any ministers he might consider fitting persons for the purpose, and

that congress had no right of interference in the matter. The chambers

were now only waiting for a suitable opportunity to assert their

authority. In 1890 it was stated that President Balmaceda had determined

to nominate and cause to be elected as his successor at the expiration

of his term of office in 1891 one of his own personal friends. This

question of the election of another president brought matters to a head,

and congress refused to vote supplies to carry on the government. To

avoid trouble Balmaceda entered into a compromise with congress, and

agreed to nominate a ministry to their liking on condition that the

supplies for 1890 were voted. This cabinet, however, was of short

duration, and resigned when the ministers understood the full amount of

friction between the president and congress. Balmaceda then nominated a

ministry not in accord with the views of congress under Senor Claudio

Vicuna, whom it was no secret that Balmaceda intended to be his

successor in the presidential chair, and, to prevent any expression of

opinion upon his conduct in the matter, he refrained from summoning an

extraordinary session of the legislature for the discussion of the

estimates of revenue and expenditure for 1891. When the 1st of January

1891 arrived, the president published a decree in the _Diario Oficial_

to the effect that the budget of 1890 would be considered the official

budget for 1891. This act was illegal and beyond the attributes of the

executive power. As a protest against the action of President Balmaceda,

the vice-president of the senate, Senor Waldo Silva, and the president

of the chamber of deputies, Senor Ramon Barros Luco, issued a

proclamation appointing Captain Jorje Montt in command of the squadron,

and stating that the navy could not recognize the authority of Balmaceda

so long as he did not administer public affairs in accordance with the

constitutional law of Chile. The majority of the members of the chambers

sided with this movement, and on the 7th of January Senores Waldo Silva,

Barros Luco and a number of senators and deputies embarked on board the

Chilean warship "Blanco Encalada," accompanied by the "Esmeralda" and

"O'Higgins" and other vessels, sailing out of Valparaiso harbour and

proceeding northwards to Tarapaca to organize armed resistance against

the president (see CHILEAN CIVIL WAR). It was not alone this action of

Balmaceda in connexion with congress that brought about the revolution.

He had alienated the sympathy of the aristocratic classes of Chile by

his personal vanity and ambition. The oligarchy composed of the great

landowners have always been an important factor in the political life of

the republic; when President Balmaceda found that he was not a _persona

grata_ to this circle he determined to endeavour to govern without their

support, and to bring into the administration a set of men who had no

traditions and with whom his personality would be all-powerful. The

Clerical influence was also thrown against him in consequence of his

radical ideas in respect of Church matters.

Immediately on the outbreak of the revolution President Balmaceda

published a decree declaring Montt and his companions to be traitors,

and without delay organized an army of some 40,000 men for the

suppression of the insurrectionary movement. While both sides were

preparing for extremities, Balmaceda administered the government under

dictatorial powers with a congress of his own nomination. In June 1891

he ordered the presidential election to be held, and Senor Claudio

Vicuna was duly declared chosen as president of the republic for the

term commencing in September 1891. The resources of Balmaceda were

running short on account of the heavy military expenses, and he

determined to dispose of the reserve of silver bullion accumulated in

the vaults of the Casa de Moneda in accordance with the terms of the law

for the conversion of the note issue. The silver was conveyed abroad in

a British man-of-war, and disposed of partly for the purchase of a fast

steamer to be fitted as an auxiliary cruiser and partly in payment for

other kinds of war material.

The organization of the revolutionary forces went on slowly. Much

difficulty was experienced in obtaining the necessary arms and

ammunition. A supply of rifles was bought in the United States, and

embarked on board the "Itata," a Chilean vessel in the service of the

rebels. The United States authorities refused to allow this steamer to

leave San Diego, and a guard was stationed on the ship. The "Itata,"

however, slipped away and made for the Chilean coast, carrying with her

the representatives of the United States. A fast cruiser was immediately

sent in pursuit, but only succeeded in overhauling the rebel ship after

she was at her destination. The "Itata" was then forced to return to San

Diego without landing her cargo for the insurgents. The necessary arms

and ammunition were arranged for in Europe; they were shipped in a

British vessel, and transferred to a Chilean steamer at Fortune Bay, in

Tierra del Fuego, close to the Straits of Magellan and the Falkland

Islands, and thence carried to Iquique, where they were safely

disembarked early in July 1891. A force of 10,000 men was now raised by

the _junta_ of the revolution, and preparations were rapidly pushed

forward for a move to the south with the object of attacking Valparaiso

and Santiago. Early in April a portion of the revolutionary squadron,

comprising the "Blanco Encalada" and other ships, was sent to the

southward for reconnoitring purposes and put into the port of Caldera.

During the night of the 23rd of April, and whilst the "Blanco Encalada"

was lying quietly at anchor, a torpedo boat called the "Almirante

Lynch," belonging to the Balmaceda faction, steamed into the bay of

Caldera and discharged a torpedo at the rebel ship. The "Blanco

Encalada" sank in a few minutes and 300 of her crew perished.

Defeat and suicide of Balmaceda.

In the middle of August 1891 the rebel forces were embarked at Iquique

(where a provisional government under Captain Jorje Montt had been set

up), numbering in all about 9000 men, and sailed for the south. On the

20th of August the congressist army was disembarked at Quinteros, about

20 m. north of Valparaiso, and marched to Concon, where the Balmacedists

were entrenched. A severe fight ensued, in which the troops of President

Balmaceda were defeated with heavy loss. This reverse roused the worst

passions of the president, and he ordered the arrest and imprisonment of

all persons suspected of sympathy with the revolutionary cause. The

population generally were, however, distinctly antagonistic to

Balmaceda; and this feeling had become accentuated since the 17th of

August 1891, on which date he had ordered the execution of a number of

youths belonging to the military college at San Lorenzo on a charge of

seditious practices. The shooting of these boys created a feeling of

horror throughout the country, and a sensation of uncertainty as to what

measures of severity might not be practised in the future if Balmaceda

won the day. After the victory at Concon the insurgent army, under

command of General Campos, marched in a southerly direction towards Vina

del Mar, and thence to Placilla, where the final struggle in the

conflict took place. Balmaceda's generals Barbosa and Alcerrica had here

massed their troops in a strong position. The battle, on the 28th of

August, resulted in victory for the rebels. Both the Balmacedist

generals were killed and Valparaiso was at once occupied. Three days

later the victorious insurgents entered Santiago and assumed the

government of the republic. After the batile of Placilla it was clear to

President Balmaceda that he could no longer hope to find a sufficient

strength amongst his adherents to maintain himself in power, and in view

of the rapid approach of the rebel army he abandoned his official duties

to seek an asylum in the Argentine legation. The president remained

concealed in this retreat until the 18th of September. On the evening of

that date, when the term for which he had been elected president of the

republic terminated, he committed suicide by shooting himself. The

excuse for this act, put forward in letters written shortly before his

end, was that he did not believe the conquerors would give him an

impartial trial. The death of Balmaceda finished all cause of contention

in Chile, and was the closing act of the most severe and bloodiest

struggle that country had ever witnessed. In the various engagements

throughout the conflict more than 10,000 lives were lost, and the joint

expenditure of the two governments on military preparations and the

purchase of war material exceeded L10,000,000 sterling.

An unfortunate occurrence soon after the close of the revolution brought

strained relations for a short period between the governments of the

United States and Chile. A number of men of the U.S.S. "Baltimore"

having been given liberty on shore, an argument arose between some of

them and a group of Chilean sailors in a drinking den in Valparaiso.

Words led to blows. The Americans were badly handled, one of their

number being killed and others severely hurt. The United States

government characterized the affair as an outrage, demanding an

indemnity as satisfaction. The Chilean authorities demurred at this

attitude, and attempted to argue the matter. James G. Elaine, then

secretary of state, refused peremptorily to listen to any explanations.

In the end Chile paid an indemnity of $75,000 as asked, but the affair

left bad feeling in its train.

President Jorje Montt.

The close of the revolution against Balmaceda left the government of

Chile in the hands of the _junta_ under whose guidance the military and

naval operations had been organized. Admiral Jorje Montt had been the

head of this revolutionary committee, and he acted as president of the

provisional government when the administration of the country changed

hands after the victory of the Congressional party. An election was now

immediately ordered for the choice of a president of the republic and

for representatives in the senate and chamber of deputies. Admiral

Montt, as head of the executive power, stanchly refused to allow

official influence to be brought to bear in any way in the presidential

campaign. The great majority of the voters, however, required no

pressure to decide who was in their opinion the man most fitted to

administer the affairs of the republic. For the first time in the

history of Chile a perfectly free election was held, and Admiral Montt

was duly chosen by a nearly unanimous vote to be chief magistrate for

the constitutional term of five years. The senate and chamber of

deputies were formally constituted in due course, and the government of

the republic resumed normal conditions of existence. The new president

showed admirable tact in dealing with the difficult problem he was

called upon to face. Party feeling still ran high between the partisans

of the two sides of the recent conflict. Admiral Montt took the view

that it was politic and just to let bygones be bygones, and he acted

conscientiously by this principle in all administrative measures in

connexion with the supporters of the late President Balmaceda. Early in

1892 an amnesty was granted to the officers of the Balmaceda regime, and

they were freely permitted to return to Chile without any attempt being

made to molest them. The first political act of national importance of

the new government was the grant of control to the municipalities, which

hitherto had possessed little power to direct local affairs, and were

not even permitted to dispose of the municipal revenues to any important

amount without first obtaining the consent of the central government.

Almost absolute power was now given these corporations to manage their

own concerns, and the organization of the police was placed in their

hands; at a later period, however, it was found necessary to modify this

latter condition.

President Montt next turned his attention towards the question of how

best to repair the damage occasioned to the country by eight months of

civil warfare. The plan of public works authorized in 1887 was

reconsidered, and the construction of portions of the various

undertakings recommenced. The army and navy were reorganized. Additional

instructors were brought from Germany, and all arms of the military

service were placed on a thoroughly efficient footing in matters of

drill and discipline. Several new and powerful cruisers were added to

the navy, and the internal economy of this branch of the national

defence was thoroughly inspected and many defects were remedied.

President Montt then took in hand the question of a reform of the

currency, the abolition of inconvertible paper money, and the

re-establishment of a gold basis as the monetary standard of the

republic. This reform of the currency became the keynote of the

president's policy during the remainder of his term of office. Great

opposition was raised by the representatives of the debtor class in

congress to the suppression of the inconvertible paper money, but in the

end President Montt carried the day, and on the 11th of February 1895 a

measure finally became law establishing a gold currency as the only

legal tender in Chile. In July 1896 the Conversion Act was put in force,

a dollar of 18d. being the monetary unit adopted. In 1895 relations with

the neighbouring republic of Argentina began to become somewhat strained

in regard to the interpretation of the treaty concerning the boundary

between the two countries. The treaties of 1881, 1893 and 1895 left

doubts in the minds of both Chileans and Argentines as to the position

of the frontier line. On the 17th of April 1896 another protocol was

drawn up, by which the contending parties agreed to submit any

differences to the arbitration of Great Britain, at the instance of one

or both governments. President Montt had now fulfilled his term of

office, and on the 18th of September 1896 he handed over the

presidential power to his successor, Senor Federico Errazuriz, who had

been duly elected in the month of June previously.

President Errazuriz.

Crisis with Argentina.

The election for the position of president of the republic was closely

contested in 1896 between Senor Errazuriz and Senor Reyes, and ended in

the triumph of the former candidate by the narrow majority of one vote.

The father of the new president had been chief magistrate of Chile from

1871 to 1876, and his administration had been one of the best the

country had ever enjoyed; his son had therefore traditions to uphold in

the post he was now called upon to fill. At the beginning of 1897 the

public attention was absorbed by foreign political questions. The

problems to be solved were the frontier difficulty with Argentina, the

question of the possession of Tacna and Arica with Peru, and the

necessity of fulfilling the obligation contracted with Bolivia to give

that country a seaport on the Pacific coast. The treaty made in 1896

with the Argentine government, referring to the arbitration of disputed

points concerning the boundary, became practically for the moment a dead

letter, and both Argentines and Chileans began to talk openly of an

appeal to arms to settle the matter once for all. The governments of

both countries began to purchase large supplies of war material, and

generally to make preparations for a possible conflict. In these

circumstances no final settlement with Peru and Bolivia was possible,

the authorities of those republics holding back to see the issue of the

Chile-Argentine dispute, and Chile being in no position at the time to

insist on any terms being arranged. So matters drifted until the

beginning of 1898. In July of that year the crisis reached an acute

stage. Both Chile and Argentina put forward certain pretensions to

territory in the Atacama district to the north, and also to a section of

Patagonia in the south. Neither side would give way, nor was any

disposition exhibited to refer the matter to arbitration under the

protocol of 1896. The cry of an acute financial crisis emanating from

the fear of war with Argentina was now raised in Chile. The president

was advised that the only way of averting the financial ruin of the

banking institutions of the republic was to suspend the conversion law

and lend from the national treasury inconvertible notes to the banks.

Senor Errazuriz weakly gave way, and a decree was promulgated placing

the currency once more on an inconvertible paper money basis until 1902.

In August of 1898 the Chilean government determined to insist upon the

terms of the protocol of 1896 being acted upon, and intimated to

Argentina that they demanded the fulfilment of the clause relating to

arbitration on disputed points. This was practically an ultimatum, and a

refusal on the part of the Argentine government to comply with the terms

of the 1896 agreement meant a declaration of war by Chile. For a few

days the issue hung in the balance, and then the Argentine government

accepted the provisions made in 1896 for arbitration. The dispute

concerning the Atacama district was submitted to an arbitration

tribunal, consisting of the representative of the United States in

Argentina, assisted by one Argentine and one Chilean commissioner. This

tribunal, after due investigation, gave their decision in April 1899,

and the verdict was accepted unreservedly by both governments. The

dispute regarding the Patagonian territory was submitted to the

arbitration of Great Britain, and a commission--consisting of Lord

Macnaghten, Sir John Ardagh and Sir T.H. Holdich--was appointed in 1899

to hear the case.

The Argentine difficulty was ended, but Chile still had to find a

settlement with Peru and Bolivia. The treaty made with the former

country in 1893 was not ratified, as it was thought to concede too much

to Peru, and the subsequent _ad referendum_ treaty was rejected on

account of Peru claiming that only Peruvians, and not all residents,

should have the right to vote in the plebiscite to be taken by the terms

of the treaty of 1883 for the possession of Tacna and Arica. By the

terms of the armistice of 1883 between Chile and Bolivia, a three years'

notice had to be given by either government wishing to denounce that

agreement. By the protocol of 1895 Chile agreed to give to Bolivia the

port of Arica, or some other suitable position on the seaboard. On these

lines a settlement was proposed. Vitor, a landing-place a little to the

south of Arica, was offered by the Chilean government to Bolivia, but

refused as not complying with the conditions stated in the protocol of

1895; the Bolivians furthermore preferred to wait and see if Arica was

finally ceded by Peru to Chile, and if so to claim the fulfilment of the

terms of the protocol.

After the accession to office of President Errazuriz there was no

stability of any ministry. Political parties in congress were so evenly

balanced and so subdivided into groups that a vote against the ministry

was easy to obtain, and the resignation of the cabinet immediately

followed in accordance with the so-called parliamentary system in vogue

in Chile. The president of the republic has no power to dissolve the

chambers, to endeavour to remedy the evil by one or another political

party obtaining a substantial working majority, but must wait to see the

results of the triennial elections. As a consequence of these conditions

Conservative, Liberal and coalition ministries held office at short

intervals. These unsettled political circumstances checked any

continuity of policy, and tended to block the passage of all useful

legislation to help forward the economic development of the country and

inhabitants; on the other hand, the financial situation was better by

the end of 1899 than in the previous year, since all proposals for a

fresh paper issue had been vetoed; and the elections for congress and

municipal office at the opening of 1900 returned a majority favourable

to a stable currency policy.

In September 1900 a fresh outburst of hostile feeling against Chile was

created in Argentina by a note addressed by the Chilean government to

Bolivia, intimating that Chile was no longer inclined to hand over the

port of Arica or any other port on the Pacific, but considered the time

ripe for a final settlement of the questions connected with the Chilean

occupation of Bolivian territory, which had now been outstanding for

sixteen years. The foreign policy of Chile, as indicated by this note,

was considered by Argentina to be grasping and unconciliatory, and there

were rumours of an anti-Chilean South American federation. Chile

disclaimed any aggressive intentions; but in December the Bolivian

congress declined to relinquish their claim to a port, and refused to

conclude a definite treaty of peace. The year closed with a frontier

incident between Chile and Argentina in the disputed territory of Ultima

Esperanza, where some Argentine colonists were ejected by Chilean

police; but both governments signed protocols agreeing not to take

aggressive action in consequence.

President Riesco.

At the opening of 1901 the country was chiefly interested in the

forthcoming presidential election, for which the candidates were Don

Pedro Montt (Conservative and Clerical) and Senor German Riesco

(Liberal). The relations between President Errazuriz and congress became

rather strained, owing to the former's inclination to retain in office a

ministry on which congress had passed a vote of censure; but Errazuriz

had been in ill-health for more than a year, and on the 1st of May he

resigned, and died in July. At the ensuing election Riesco was elected

president. The attitude of Chile towards the Pan-American Congress at

Mexico became a matter of interest in the autumn, particularly in

connexion with the proposal for compulsory arbitration between all

American governments. The Chilean government made it quite clear that

they would withdraw from the congress if this proposal was meant to be

retroactive; and their unyielding attitude testified to the

apprehensions felt by Chile concerning United States interference. In

October the Chilean government announced that the contemplated

conversion scheme, for which gold had been accumulated, would be

postponed for two years (till October 1903), the gold being held as a

reserve fund pending the result of the arbitration over the Argentine

frontier. This was generally considered to be a reasonable and

statesmanlike course. Unfortunately, a recrudescence of the excitement

over the boundary dispute was occasioned by the irritation created in

Argentina by the fact that, pending a decision, Chile was constructing

roads in the disputed territory. During December 1901 relations were

exceedingly strained, and troops were called out on both sides. But at

the end of the month it was agreed to leave the question to the British

arbitrators, and the latter decided to send one of their number, Sir

T.H. Holdich, to examine the territory.

Argentine boundary award.

The survey occupied some eight months, and it was not until the autumn

that Sir T.H. Holdich returned to England to make his report. The

difficulty of ascertaining the true line watershed had been very great,

but the result was eminently successful. The award of King Edward was

signed on the 20th of November 1902, and both parties to the litigation

were satisfied. In order that future disputes might be amicably settled,

a treaty was signed by which it was agreed that any question that might

arise should be submitted to the arbitration of Great Britain or in

default of that power to the Swiss Confederation. The removal of this

source of irritation and the restoration of friendly relations between

the two republics was a great relief to the finance of Chile. Had it not

been for the political instability of the country, the effects of the

diminution of expenditure on military and naval preparations would have

effected a rapid improvement in its financial position. The constant

change of ministry (there being no stable majority in the congress)

prevented during 1903 any settled policy, or that confidence in the

government which is the basis of commercial prosperity. In 1904,

however, both trade and revenue showed signs of improvement, and the

sale of the warships "Esmeralda" and "Chambuco" for L1,000,000 furnished

a surplus, which was devoted to the improvement of the port of

Valparaiso. This was the beginning of a period of steady industrial

growth and development. The settlement of the long outstanding dispute

with Bolivia in a treaty of peace signed on the 17th of October 1905 was

very advantageous to both countries. By this treaty Bolivia ceded all

claims to a seaport and strip of the coast, on condition that Chile

constructed at her own charges a railway to Lapaz from the port of

Arica, giving at the same time to Bolivia free transit across Chilean

territory to the sea. A cash indemnity of L300,000 was also paid, and

certain stipulations were made with regard to the construction of other

railways giving access from Chile to the Bolivian interior.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Chicago, University of" to "Chiton" Volume 6, Slice 2 · 第 9 / 44 题