What do we find, here in America, in the field of "politics?"

We find first a party system which is the technical arrangement to carry

on a fight. It is perfectly conceivable that a flourishing democratic

government be carried on _without any parties at all;_ public

functionaries being elected on their merits, and each proposed measure

judged on its merits; though this sounds impossible to the androcentric

mind.

"There has never been a democracy without factions and parties!" is

protested.

There has never been a democracy, so far--only an androcracy.

A group composed of males alone, naturally divides, opposes, fights;

even a male church, under the most rigid rule, has its secret

undercurrents of antagonism.

"It is the human heart!" is again protested. No, not essentially the

human heart, but the male heart. This is so well recognized by men in

general, that, to their minds, in this mingled field of politics and

warfare, women have no place.

In "civilized warfare" they are, it is true, allowed to trail along and

practice their feminine function of nursing; but this is no part of war

proper, it is rather the beginning of the end of war. Some time it will

strike our "funny spot," these strenuous efforts to hurt and destroy,

and these accompanying efforts to heal and save.

But in our politics there is not even provision for a nursing corps;

women are absolutely excluded.

"They cannot play the game!" cries the practical politician. There

is loud talk of the defilement, the "dirty pool" and its resultant

darkening of fair reputations, the total unfitness of lovely woman to

take part in "the rough and tumble of politics."

In other words men have made a human institution into an ultra-masculine

performance; and, quite rightly, feel that women could not take part

in politics _as men do._ That it is not necessary to fulfill this

human custom in so masculine a way does not occur to them. Few men

can overlook the limitations of their sex and see the truth; that this

business of taking care of our common affairs is not only equally open

to women and men, but that women are distinctly needed in it.

Anyone will admit that a government wholly in the hands of women would

be helped by the assistance of men; that a gynaecocracy must, of its own

nature, be one sided. Yet it is hard to win reluctant admission of the

opposite fact; that an androcracy must of its own nature be one sided

also, and would be greatly improved by the participation of the other

sex.

The inextricable confusion of politics and warfare is part of the

stumbling block in the minds of men. As they see it, a nation is

primarily a fighting organization; and its principal business is

offensive and defensive warfare; therefore the ultimatum with which they

oppose the demand for political equality--"women cannot fight, therefore

they cannot vote."

Fighting, when all is said, is to them the real business of life; not to

be able to fight is to be quite out of the running; and ability to solve

our growing mass of public problems; questions of health, of education,

of morals, of economics; weighs naught against the ability to kill.

This naive assumption of supreme value in a process never of the first

importance; and increasingly injurious as society progresses, would be

laughable if it were not for its evil effects. It acts and reacts upon

us to our hurt. Positively, we see the ill effects already touched on;

the evils not only of active war; but of the spirit and methods of war;

idealized, inculcated and practiced in other social processes. It

tends to make each man-managed nation an actual or potential fighting

organization, and to give us, instead of civilized peace, that "balance

of power" which is like the counted time in the prize ring--only a rest

between combats.

It leaves the weaker nations to be "conquered" and "annexed" just as

they used to be; with tariffs instead of tribute. It forces upon

each the burden of armament; upon many the dreaded conscription; and

continually lowers the world's resources in money and in life.

Similarly in politics, it adds to the legitimate expenses of governing

the illegitimate expenses of fighting; and must needs have a "spoils

system" by which to pay its mercenaries.

In carrying out the public policies the wheels of state are continually

clogged by the "opposition;" always an opposition on one side or the

other; and this slow wiggling uneven progress, through shorn victories

and haggling concessions, is held to be the proper and only political

method.

"Women do not understand politics," we are told; "Women do not care for

politics;" "Women are unfitted for politics."

It is frankly inconceivable, from the androcentric view-point, that

nations can live in peace together, and be friendly and serviceable

as persons are. It is inconceivable also, that in the management of a

nation, honesty, efficiency, wisdom, experience and love could work out

good results without any element of combat.

The "ultimate resort" is still to arms. "The will of the majority" is

only respected on account of the guns of the majority. We have but a

partial civilization, heavily modified to sex--the male sex.

The Man-Made World; Or, Our Androcentric Culture · 第 25 / 29 题