Envoi

I have come to the end of my task; but one question troubles me.

I think of the "young men and maidens meek" who will read this

book, and I wonder what they will make of it. We have had a lark

together; we have gone romping down the vista of the ages,

swatting*, every venerable head that showed itself, beating the

dust out of ancient delusions. You would like all your life to be

that kind of lark; but you may not find it so, and perhaps you

will suffer disillusionment and vexation.

I have known hundreds of young radicals in my life; they have

nearly all been gallant and honest, but they have not all been

wise, and therefore not so happy as they might have been. In the

course of time I have formulated to myself the peril to which

young radicals are exposed. We see so much that is wrong in

ancient things, it gets to be a habit with us to reject them. We

have only to know that a thing is old to feel an impulse of

impatient scorn; on the other hand, we are tempted to welcome

anything which can prove itself to be unprecedented. There is a

common type of radical whose aim in life is to be several jumps

ahead of mankind; whose criterion of conduct is that it shocks

the bourgeois. If you do not know that type, you may find

him--and her--in the newest of the Bohemian cafes, drinking the

newest red chemicals, smoking the newest brand of cigarettes, and

discussing the newest form of psycopathia sexualis. After you

have watched them a while, you realize that these ultra-new

people have fallen victim to the oldest form of logical fallacy,

the non sequitur, and likewise to the oldest form of slavery,

which is self-indulgence.

If it is true that much in the old moral codes is based upon

ignorance, and cultivated by greed, it is also true that much in

the old moral codes is based upon facts which will not change so

long as man is what he is--a creature of impulses, good and bad,

wise and foolish, selfish and generous, and compelled to make

choice between these impulses; so long as he is a material body

and a personal consciousness, obliged to live in society and

adjust himself to the rights of others. What I would like to say

to young radicals--if there is any way to say it without seeming

a prig--is that in choosing their own path through life, they

will need not merely enthusiasm and radical fervor, but wisdom

and judgment and hard study.

It is our fundamental demand that society shall cease to repeat

over and over the blunders of the past, the blunders of tyranny

and slavery, of luxury and poverty, which wrecked the ancient

societies; and surely it is a poor way to begin by repeating in

our own persons the most ancient blunders of the moral life. To

light the fires of lust in our hearts, and let them smoulder

there, and imagine we are trying new experiments in psychology!

Who does not know the radical woman who demonstrates her

emancipation from convention by destroying her nerves with

nicotine? Who does not know the genius of revolt who demonstrates

his repudiation of private property by permitting his lady loves

to support him? Who does not know the man who finds in the

phrases of revolution the most effective devices for the seducing

of young girls?

You will have read this book to ill purpose if you draw the

conclusion that there is anything in it to spare you the duty of

getting yourself moral standards and holding yourself to them. On

the contrary, because your task is the highest and hardest that

man has yet undertaken--for this reason you will need standards

the most exacting ever formulated. Let me quote some words from a

teacher you will not accuse of holding to the slave-moralities:

Free dost thou call thyself? Thy ruling thoughts will I hear, and

not that thou hast escaped a yoke.

Art thou such a one that can escape a yoke?

Free from what? What is that to Zarathustra! Clear shall your eye

tell me: free to what?

Canst thou give to thyself thy good and thine evil, and hang thy

will above thee as thy law? Canst thou be thine own judge, and

avenger of thy law?

Fearful it is to be alone with the judge and the avenger of thy

law. So is a stone flung out into empty space and into the icy

breath of isolation.

Out of the pit of ignorance and despair we emerge into the

sunlight of knowledge, to take control of a world, and to make it

over, not according to the will of any gods, but according to the

law in our own hearts. For that task we have need of all the

resources of our being; of courage and high devotion, of faith in

ourselves and our comrades, of clean, straight thinking, of

discipline both of body and mind. We go to this task with a

knowledge as old as the first moral impulse of mankind--the

knowledge that our actions determine the future of life, not

merely for ourselves but for all the race. For this is one of the

laws of the ancient Hebrews which modern science has not

repealed, but on the contrary has reinforced with a thousand

confirmations--that the sins of the fathers are visited upon the

children unto the third and fourth generations.

I get letters from the readers of my books; nearly always they

are young people, so I feel like the father of a large family. I

gather them now about my knee, and pronounce upon them a

benediction in the ancient patriarchal style. Children and

grandchildren of my hopes, for ages men suffered and fought, so

that the world might be turned over to you. Now the day is

coming, the glad, new day which blinds us with the shining of its

wings; it is coming so swiftly that I am afraid of it. I thought

we should have more time to get ready for the taking over of the

world! But the old managers of it went insane, they took to

tearing each other's eyes out, and now they lie dead about us.

So, whether we will or not, we have to take charge of the world;

we have to decide what to do with it, even while we are doing it.

Let us not fail, young comrades; let us not write on the scroll

of history that mankind had to go through yet new generations of

wars and tumults and enslavements, because the youth of the

international revolution could not lift themselves above those

ancient personal vices which wrecked the fair hopes of their

fathers--bigotry and intolerance, vindictiveness and vanity,

envy, hatred and malice and all uncharitableness!

Reader:

For twenty years I have been haunted by the dream that I might

some day be my own publisher. I was waiting till I could afford

the luxury; but many a man has put off a bold action till he

died, so I am publishing this book without being able to afford

it.

The reason is that I do not want to be a writer for the rich. I

want to be read by working-boys and girls, and by poor students.

I offer the book at a low price. In the hope of tempting you to

go out and get your friends to read it, I have made a price in

quantities which will allow no profit at all. A margin has been

figured to cover postage, stationery, circulars, and the cost of

a clerical assistant; but nothing for interest on capital, which

is a gift, nor for the rent of an office, which is my home, nor

for the services of manager and press agent, which is myself.

You have read the book, and its fate is yours to decide. If it

seems worth while, pass it on to someone else. If you can afford

it, order a number of copies and give them away. If you can't

afford it, give your time and be a book-agent.

The Profits of Religion: An Essay in Economic Interpretation · 第 117 / 117 题