The Church Machine

The Catholics of His time came to Jesus and said, "Master, we

would have a sign of Thee"--meaning that they wanted him to do

some magic, to prove to their vulgar minds that his power came

from God. He answered by calling them an evil and adulterous

generation--which is exactly what I have said about the Papal

machine. The Baptists and Methodists and Presbyterians and other

book-worshippers of his time accused him of violating the sacred

commands so definitely set down in their ancient texts, and to

them he answered that the Sabbath was made for man and not man

for the Sabbath; he called them hypocrites, and quoted Karl Marx

at them--"This people honoreth me with their lips, but their

heart is far from me." Because he despised the company of the

respectables, and went among the humble and human folk of his own

class in the places where they gathered--the public houses--the

churchly scandal-mongers called him "a man gluttonous and a

wine-bibber, a friend of publicans and sinners"--precisely as in

the old days they used to sneer at the Socialists for having

their meetings in the back-rooms of saloons, and precisely as

they still denounce us as free-lovers and atheists.

But the longing for justice between man and man, which is the

Kingdom of Heaven on earth, is the deepest instinct of the human

heart, and the voice of the carpenter cannot be confined within

the thickest church-walls, nor drowned by all the pealing organs

in Christendom. Even in these days, when the power of Mammon is

more widespread, more concentrated and more systematized than

ever before in history--even in these days of Morgan and

Rockefeller, there are Christian clergymen who dare to preach as

Jesus preached. One by one they are cast out of the

Church--Father McGlynn, George D. Herron, Alexander Irvine, J.

Stitt Wilson, Austin Adams, Algernon Crapsey, Bouck White; but

their voices are not silenced they are like the leaven, to which

Jesus compared the kingdom of God--a woman took it and hid it in

three measures of meal till the whole was leavened. The young

theological students read, and some of them understand; I know

three brothers in one family who have just gone into the Church,

and are preaching straight social revolution--and the scribes and

the pharisees have not yet dared to cast them out.

In this book I have portrayed the Christian Church as the servant

and henchman of Big Business, a part of the system of Mammon.

Every church is necessarily a money machine, holding and

administering property. And it is not alone the Catholic Church

which is in politics, seeking favors from the state--the

exemption of church property from taxation, exemption of

ministers from military service, free transportation for them and

their families on the railroads, the control of charity and

education, laws to deprive people of amusements on Sunday--so on

through a long list. As the churches have to be built with money,

you find that in them the rich possess the control and demand the

deference, while the poor are humble, and in their secret hearts

jealous and bitter; in other words, the class struggle is in the

churches, as everywhere else in the world, and the social

revolution is coming in the churches, just as it is coming in

industry.

It is a fact of deep significance that the majority of ministers

are proletarians, eking out their existence upon a miserable

salary, and beholden in all their comings and goings to the

wealthy holders of privilege. Even in the Roman Catholic Church

that is true. The ordinary priest is a man of the working class,

and knows what working people suffer and feel. So in the Catholic

Church there are proletarian rebellions; there is many a priest

who does not carry out the political orders of his superiors, but

goes to the polls and votes for his class instead of for his

pope. In Ireland, as I write, the young priests are defying their

bishops and joining the Sinn Fein, a non-religious movement for

an Irish Republic.

What is it that keeps the average workingman in subjection to the

exploiter? Simply terror, the terror of losing his job. And if

you could get into the inmost soul of Christian ministers, you

would find that precisely the same force is keeping many of them

slaves to Tradition. They are educated men, and thousands of them

must resent the dilemma which compels them to be either fools or

hypocrites. They have caught enough of the spirit of their time

not to enjoy having to pose as miracle-mongers, rain-makers and

witch-doctors; they would like to say frankly that they do not

believe that Jonah ever swallowed the whale, and even that they

are dubious about Hercules and Achilles and other demigods. But

they are part of a machine, and the old men and the rich men who

run the machine have laid down the law. Those who find themselves

tempted to think, remember suddenly that they have wives and

children; they have only one profession, they have been unfitted

for any other by a life-time of study of dead things, as well as

by the practice of altruism.

But now the Social Revolution is coming; coming upon swift

wings--it may be here before this book sees the light. And who

knows but then we may see in America that wonderful sight which

we saw in Russia, when Christian monks assembled and burned their

holy books, and petitioned the state to take them in as citizens

and human beings? It is my belief that when the power of

exploitation is broken, we shall see the Dead Hand crumble into

dust, as a mummy crumbles when it is exposed to the air. All

those men who stay in the Church and pretend to believe nonsense,

because it affords an easy way to earn a living, will suddenly

realize that it is possible to earn a living outside; that any

man can go into a factory, clean and well-ventilated and humanly

run, and by four hours work can earn the purchasing power of ten

or fifteen dollars. Do you not think that there may be some who

will choose freedom and self-respect on those terms?

And what of those thousands and tens of thousands who join the

church because it is a part of the regime of respectability, a

way to make the acquaintance of the rich, to curry favor and

obtain promotion, to get customers if you are a tradesman, to

extend your practice if you are a professional man? And what

about the millions who go to church because they are poor, and

because life is a desperate struggle, and this is one way to keep

the favor of the boss, to get a little better chance for the

children, to get charity if you fall into need; in short, to

acquire influence with the well-to-do and powerful, who stand

together, and like to see the poor humble and reverent, contented

in that state of life to which it has pleased God to call them?

The Profits of Religion: An Essay in Economic Interpretation · 第 111 / 117 题