CONNECTION OF LANGUAGE AND PHYSICAL CONFORMATION.

That we spoke at all might rightly be called a work of nature, _opera

naturale_, as Dante said long ago; but that we spoke thus or thus,

_cosi o cosi_, that, as the same Dante said, depended on our

pleasure--that was our work. To imagine, therefore, that as a matter

of necessity, or as a matter of fact, dolichocephalic skulls had

anything to do with Aryan, mesophalic with Semitic, or brachycephalic

with Turanian speech, was nothing but the wildest random thought. It

could convey no rational meaning whatever; we might as well say that

all painters were dolichocephalic, and all musicians brachycephalic,

or that all lophocomic tribes worked in gold, and all lisocomic tribes

in silver. If anything must be ascribed to prehistoric times, surely

the differentiation of the human skull, the human hair and the human

skin would have to be ascribed to that distant period. No one, he

believed, had ever maintained that a mesocephalic skull was split or

differentiated into a dolichocephalic and a brachycephalic variety in

the bright sunshine of history. Nevertheless, he had felt for years

that knowledge of languages must be considered in future as a _sine

qua non_ for every anthropologist. How few of the books in which we

trusted with regard to the characteristic peculiarities of savage

races had been written by men who had lived among them for ten or

twenty years, and who had learned their languages till they could

speak them as well as the natives themselves. It was no excuse to say

that any traveler who had eyes to see and ears to hear could form a

correct estimate of the doings and sayings of savage tribes.

Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891 · 第 47 / 59 题