The Rapieff burner, employed in the 'Times' office, consists of four

carbon pencils, arranged thus [Symbol] (except that the two v's are

not in the same plane, but in planes at right angles to each other).

The spark crosses the space between the points of the v's, and

arrangements are made for keeping the two points at the right distance

from each other, and also for keeping the ends of the two pencils which

form each point in their proper position. If the current is from any

cause interrupted, an automatic arrangement is adopted to allow the

current to pass to the other lamps in the same circuit. There are

six lamps in circuit at the 'Times' office; and M. Rapieff has

exhibited as many as ten. The advantages claimed for this

light are the following:--'First, its production by any description

of dynamo-electric machine with either alternating or continuous

currents; secondly, great diversibility and complete independence

of the several lights, and long duration without change of carbons;

and lastly, the extreme facility with which any ordinary workman or

servant can renew the carbons when necessary, without extinguishing

the lights.' The last-named advantage results, it need hardly perhaps

be said, from the use of two carbons to form each point. One can be

removed, the other remaining to keep the voltaic arc intact until a

new carbon has been substituted for its fellow; then it in turn can be

replaced by a new carbon, the new carbon already inserted keeping the

voltaic arc intact.

The six lamps at the 'Times' office thoroughly illuminate the room, and

give light for working the eight Walter presses used in printing the

paper. The light has been thus used since the middle of last October,

and it is said that other rooms in the building are shortly to be

illuminated in the same manner. 'Each lamp is enclosed in an opal globe

of about four inches in diameter, and so little heat is given off, that

the hand can be placed on the globe without inconvenience, even after

the light has been burning for some time.'

In the Wallace lamp there are two horizontal plates of carbon, about

nine inches in diameter, instead of mere carbon points. When the

current is passing, these carbon plates are separated by a suitable

small distance which remains unchanged. The electric arc, being started

at the point along the edge of the carbons where there is least

resistance to the passage of the current, gradually passes along the

edge of the carbons as combustion goes on, changing the position of

the place of nearest approach and consequently of least resistance.

The light will thus burn for many hours (even for a hundred with large

carbon plates), and any number of lights up to ten can be worked from

the machine. The objection to the Wallace lamp is, that the light does

not remain at one point, but travels along the whole extent of the

carbons. It will not be easy to design a glass shade which will be

suitable for a light thus changing in position.

The Werdermann regulator is on an entirely new plan; but it has not yet

been submitted to the test of practical working outside the laboratory.

The positive carbon, which is lowest, ends in a sharp point, which

strangely enough retains its figure, while the carbon burns away at

the rate of about two inches per hour. The negative carbon is a block

having its under side, against which the positive carbon presses,

slightly convex. The positive carbon is pressed steadily against the

negative by the action of a weight. The increased resistance to the

passage of the current, at the sharp point of the positive carbon,

generates sufficient heat to produce a powerful light. The light

resembles a steadily radiant star, but 'with all its softness and

purity of tint, it is so intense, that adjacent gas-flames are thrown

on the wall as transparent shadows.' The light will last for fifteen

hours without attention, the positive carbon rod being used in lengths

of three feet. The carbon block hardly undergoes any change. When the

lamp has been burning a long time, a slight depression can be seen

at the place where the positive carbon touches it, but by shifting

the carbon in its holder this is easily remedied. Mr. Werdermann

lately exhibited a row of ten small lamps burning side by side at the

same time. 'The two wires from the machine,' says Mr. Hepworth, were

carried one on either side of this row of lamps, branch wires being led

from them for the service of each lamp. Mr. Werdermann says that his

perfected lamps will be furnished with keys, by which the current can

be turned on or off, as in the case of gas. We may say in fact, that

in the nature of its connections and various arrangements, it ("the

Werdermann lamp") most nearly comes up in convenience to the use of

gas.'

We do not yet know certainly what arrangement Mr. Edison employs to

obtain the light of which so much has been heard. It is asserted that

his light is obtained from the incandescence of an alloy of iridium and

platinum, which will bear without fusion a heat[26] of 5,000 degrees

Fahrenheit. It would be unsafe, however, to assume that this account is

trustworthy, or to infer (as we might in the case of almost any other

inventor), that such being the nature of his plan, it could lead to no

result of practical value. As has been well remarked by a contemporary

writer, whatever Edison's invention may be, 'it is certain to be

something to command respect, even if it does not quite come up to the

glowing accounts which have reached us in advance.'

The following passage from one of these accounts, which appeared in the

'New York Herald,' will be read with interest, and may be accepted as

trustworthy so far as it goes. 'The writer last night saw the invention

in operation in Mr. Edison's laboratory. The inventor was deep in

experimental researches. What he called the apparatus consisted of a

small metal stand placed on the table. Surrounding the light was a

small glass globe. Near by was a gas jet burning low. The Professor

looked up from his work, to greet the reporter, and in reply to a

request to view the invention, waved his hand towards the light, with

the exclamation, "There she is!" The illumination was such as would

come from a brilliant gas jet surrounded with ground glass, only that

the light was clearer and more brilliant. "Now I extinguish it and

light the gas, and you can see the difference," said Mr. Edison, and

he touched the spring. Instantly all was darkness. Then he turned on

the gas. The difference was quite perceptible. The light from the gas

appeared in comparison tinted with yellow. In a moment, however, the

eye had become accustomed to it, and the yellowish tint disappeared.

Then the Professor turned on the electric light, giving the writer the

opportunity of seeing both, side by side. The electric light seemed

much softer; a continuous view of it for three minutes did not pain

the eye; whereas looking at the gas for the same length of time caused

some little pain and confusion of sight. One of the noticeable features

of the light, when fully turned on, was that all the colours could

be distinguished as readily as by sunlight. "When do you expect to

have the invention completed, Mr. Edison?" asked the reporter. "The

substance of it is all right now," he answered, putting the apparatus

away and turning on the gas. "But there are the usual little details

that must be attended to before it goes to the people. For instance, we

have got to devise some arrangement for registering a sort of meter,

and again, there are several different forms that we are experimenting

on now, in order to select the best." "Are the lights to be all of the

same degree of brilliancy?" asked the reporter. "All the same!" "Have

you come across any serious difficulties in it as yet?" "Well, no,"

replied the inventor, "and that's what worries me, for in the telephone

I found about a thousand;[27] and so in the quadruplex. I worked on

both over two years before I overcame them."'

Other methods, as the Sawyer-Man system, and the Brush system, need not

at present detain us, as little is certainly known respecting them. In

the former it is said that the light is obtained from an incandescent

carbon pencil, within a space containing nitrogen and no oxygen, so

that there is no combustion. In the latter the carbon points are placed

as in the ordinary electric lamp, but are so suspended in the clasp of

a regulator, that they burn 14 inches of carbon without adjustment, the

carbons lasting eight hours, and producing a flood of intense white

light, estimated as equivalent to 3,000 candles.

I have little space to consider the cost of electric lighting, even

if the question were one which could be suitably dealt with in these

pages. Opinions are very much divided as to the relative cost of

lighting by gas and by electricity; but the balance of opinion seem to

be in favour of the belief that in America and France certainly, and

probably in this country, where gas is cheap, electric lighting will

on the whole be as cheap as lighting by gas. It should be noticed,

in making a comparison between this country and others in which coal

is dearer, that the cheapness of coal here, though favourable in the

main to gas illumination, is also favourable, though in less degree

(relatively) to electric lighting. Machines for generating electricity

can be worked more cheaply here than in America. Nay, it has even

been found advantageous in some cases to use a gas engine to generate

electricity. Thus Mr. Van der Weyde used an Otto gas engine driven

at the cost of 6_d._ an hour for gas, to produce the light which he

exhibited publicly on the night of November 9. So that the cheapness of

gas may make the electric light cheaper. Then it is to be remembered

that important though the question of cost is, it is far from being

all-important. The advantages of electric lighting for many purposes,

as in public libraries, in cases where many persons work together

under conditions rendering the vitiation of the air by gas lighting

exceedingly mischievous, and in cases where the recognition of delicate

differences of tint or texture is essential, must far more than

compensate for some slight difference in cost. The possibility (shown

by actual experience to be real) of employing natural sources of power

to drive machines for generating electricity, is another interesting

element of the subject, but could not be properly dealt with save in

greater space than this here available.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 23: It is supposed by many, that when the spark is long

enough we can note the direction in which it travels; and observations

of the motion of lightning from the earth to the cloud have been

collected, as showing that the usually observed direction of the flash

is sometimes reversed. In reality, no one has ever seen a lightning

flash travel either one way or the other. If the attention is fixed

on the storm cloud, as usual when a lightning storm is watched, every

flash appears to pass from the cloud to the earth. If, on the contrary,

at the moment when the attention is fixed on some terrestrial object

the lightning flashes near that particular object, the flash will seem

to pass from the object to the cloud. In either case the motion is

apparent only. If there is motion at all, the passage of the electric

spark occupies less than the 100,000th part of a second, and of course

it is utterly impossible that any eye could tell at which end of its

track the flash first appeared. In every case the flash seems to travel

from the end to which attention was more nearly directed. The apparent

motion corresponds to the chance direction of the eye.]

[Footnote 24: The extremity of the wire connected with the metal least

affected by the acid solution is called the positive pole, that of the

wire connected with the metal most affected by the solution is called

the negative pole.]

[Footnote 25: So called, though in reality the best magnets gradually

lose force.]

[Footnote 26: My occasional use of the word 'heat' where in scientific

writing 'temperature' would be the word used, has exposed me to

peevish, not to say petulant comments from Professor P.G. Tait, who

has denounced half the mathematical world for using the word 'force,'

in the sense in which Newton used it, and has spoken of an eminent

physicist as one deserving universal execration and opprobrium for

not explaining, when speaking of work done against gravity, that

terrestrial gravity was meant, and not gravity on the sun, or Jupiter,

or Mars, or anywhere in the heavens above or in the earth beneath,

but only at the earth's surface. Where there is no risk of confusion,

the word 'heat' may be used either to signify temperature, as when

in ordinary speech and writing we talk of blood-heat, fever-heat,

summer-heat, and so forth. Science, indeed, very properly forbids

the use of the word in any sense save one. But outside the pages of

scientific treatises, there is no inaccuracy in using a word in a sense

popularly attributed to it, when no mistake can possibly arise. No one

can suppose, when I speak of a heat of so many degrees Fahrenheit or

Centigrade, that I mean anything but such and such a degree of heat,

any more than if I spoke of the intense heat of that _savant entêté_,

Professor P.G. Tait, any one would imagine that I referred to his

calorific condition.]

[Footnote 27: The comments made by one of Mr. Edison's assistants

on this point are interesting and instructive. 'Mr. Batchelor, the

Professor's assistant, who here joined in the conversation,' proceeds

the report of the _Herald_, 'said, "Many a time Mr. Edison sat down

almost on the point of giving up the telephone as a lost job; but at

the last moment, he would see light." "Of all things that we have

discovered, this is about the simplest," continued Mr. Edison, "and the

public will say so when it is explained. We have got it pretty well

advanced now, but there are some few improvements I have in my mind.

You see, it has got to be so fixed that it cannot get out of order.

Suppose when one light only is employed it got out of order once a

year, where two were used it would get out of order twice a year, and

where a thousand were used you can see there would be much trouble in

looking after them. Therefore, when the light leaves the laboratory, I

want it to be in such a shape that it cannot get out of order at all,

except of course by some accident."']

PRINTED BY

SPOTTISWOODE AND CO. LTD., NEW-STREET SQUARE

LONDON

Trascribers Note:

Original spelling has been retained.

End of Project Gutenberg's Rough Ways Made Smooth, by Richard A. Proctor

Rough Ways Made Smooth: A series of familiar essays on scientific subjects · 第 26 / 26 段