Both sisters participated in the Stubland break back to colour, but

while Aunt Phyllis was a wit and her hats a spree Aunt Phœbe was

fantastically serious and her hats went beyond a joke. They got their

stuffs apparently from the shop of William Morris and Co., they had

their dresses built upon Pre-Raphaelite lines, they did their hair

plainly and simply but very carelessly, and their hats were noble

brimmers or extravagant toques. Their profiles were as fine almost as

Arthur’s, a type of profile not so suitable for young women as for

golden youth. They were bright-eyed and a little convulsive in their

movements. Beneath these extravagances and a certain conversational

wildness they lived nervously austere lives. They were greatly delighted

with Peter, but they did not know what to do with him. Phyllis held him

rather better than Phœbe, but Phœbe with her chatelaine amused him

rather more than Phyllis.

“How happy a tinker’s baby must be,” said Aunt Phœbe, rattling her

trinkets: “Or a tin-smith’s.”

“I begin to see some use in a Hindoo woman’s bangles,” said Aunt

Phyllis, “or in that clatter machine of yours, Phœbe. Every young mother

should rattle. Make a note of it, Phœbe dear, for your book....”

“Whatever you do with him, Dolly,” said Aunt Phœbe, “teach him anyhow to

respect women and treat them as his equals. From the Very First.”

“Meaning votes,” said Aunt Phyllis. “Didums _want_ give um’s mummy a

_Vote_ den.”

“Never let him touch butcher’s meat in any shape or form,” said Aunt

Phœbe. “Once a human child tastes blood the mischief is done.”

“Avoid patriotic songs and symbols,” prompted Aunt Phyllis, who had

heard these ideas already in the train coming down.

“And never buy him toy soldiers, drums, guns, trumpets. These things

soak deeper into the mind than people suppose. They make wickedness

domestic.... Surround him with beautiful things. Accustom him——”

She winced that Arthur should hear her, but she spoke as one having a

duty to perform.

“Accustom him to the nude, Dolly, from his early years. Associate it

with innocent amusements. Retrieve the fall. Never let him wear a hat

upon his head nor boots upon his feet. As soon tie him up into a

papoose. As soon tight-lace. A child’s first years should be one long

dream of loveliness and spontaneous activity.”

But at this point Peter betrayed signs that he found his aunts

overstimulating. He released his grip upon the thimble-case of the

chatelaine. His face puckered, ridges and waves and puckers of pink

fatness ran distractedly over it, and he threw his head back and opened

a large square toothless mouth.

“Mary,” cried Dolly, and a comfortable presence that had been hovering

mistrustfully outside the door ever since the aunts appeared, entered

with alacrity and bore Peter protectingly away.

“He must be almost entirely lungs,” said Aunt Phœbe, when her voice

could be heard through the receding bawl. “Other internal organs no

doubt develop later.”

“Come out to the stone table under the roses,” said Dolly. “We argue

there about Peter’s upbringing almost every afternoon.”

“Argue, I grant you,” said Aunt Phœbe, following her hostess and

dangling her chatelaine from one hand as if to illustrate her remarks,

“but argue rightly.”

When Oswald came over in the afternoon he was disposed to regard the two

aunts as serious reinforcements to Arthur’s educational heresies.

Phyllis and Phœbe were a little inclined to be shy with him as a strange

man, and he and Arthur did most of the talking, but they made their

positions plain by occasional interpolations. Arthur, supported by their

presence, was all for letting Peter grow up a wild untrammelled child of

nature. Oswald became genuinely distressed.

“But education,” he protested, “is as natural to a human being as nests

to birds.”

“Then why force it?” said Phyllis with dexterity.

“Even a cat boxes its kittens’ ears!”

“A domesticated cat,” said Phœbe. “A _civilized_ cat.”

“But I’ve seen a wild lioness——”

“Are we to learn how to manage our young from lions and hyenas!” cried

Phœbe.

They were too good for Oswald. He saw Peter already ruined, a fat,

foolish, undisciplined cub.

Dolly with sympathetic amusement watched his distress, which his living

half face betrayed in the oddest contrast to his left hand calm.

Arthur had been thinking gracefully while his sisters tackled their

adversary. Now he decided to sum up the discussion. His authoritative

manner on these occasions was always slightly irritating to Oswald. Like

so many who read only occasionally and take thought as a special

exercise, Arthur had a fixed persuasion that nobody else ever read or

thought at all. So that he did not so much discuss as adjudicate.

“Of course,” he said, “we have to be reasonable in these things. For men

a certain artificiality is undoubtedly natural. That is, so to speak,

the human paradox. But artificiality is the last resort. Instinct is our

basis. For the larger part the boy has just to grow. But We watch his

growth. Education is really watching—keeping the course. The human error

is to do too much, to distrust instinct too much, to over-teach,

over-legislate, over-manage, over-decorate——”

“No, you _don’t_, my gentleman,” came the voice of Mary from the shadow

under the old pear tree.

“Now I wonder——” said Arthur, craning his neck to look over the rose

bushes.

“Diddums then,” said Mary. “Woun’t they lettim put’tt in ’s mouf?

_Oooh!_”

“Trust her instinct,” said Dolly, and Arthur was restrained.

Oswald took advantage of the interruption to take the word from Arthur.

“We joke and sharpen our wits in this sort of talk,” he said, “but

education, you know, isn’t a joke. It might be the greatest power in the

world. If I didn’t think I was a sort of schoolmaster in Africa....

That’s the only decent excuse a white man has for going there.... I’m

getting to be a fanatic about education. Give me the schools of the

world and I would make a Millennium in half a century.... You don’t mean

to let Peter drift. You say it, but you can’t mean it. Drift is waste.

We don’t make half of what we _could_ make of our children. We don’t

make a quarter—not a tenth. They could know ever so much more, think

ever so much better. We’re all at sixes and sevens.”

He realized he wasn’t good at expressing his ideas. He had intended

something very clear and compelling, a sort of ultimatum about Peter.

“I believe in Sir Francis Galton,” Aunt Phœbe remarked in his pause;

saying with stern resolution things that she felt had to be said. They

made her a little breathless, and she fixed her eye on the view until

they were said. “Eugenics. It is a new idea. A revival. Plato had it.

Men ought to be bred like horses. No marriage or any nonsense of that

kind. Just a simple scientific blending of points. Then Everything would

be different.”

“Almost too different,” Arthur reflected....

“When I consider Peter and think of all one could do for him——” said

Oswald, still floundering for some clenching way of putting it....

§ 5

One evening Dolly caught her cousin looking at her husband with an

expression that stuck in her memory. It was Oswald’s habit to sit if he

could in such a position that he could rest the obliterated cheek of his

face upon a shadowing hand, his fingers on his forehead. Then one saw

what a pleasant-faced man he would have been if only he had left that

Egyptian shell alone. So he was sitting on this occasion, his elbow on

the arm of the settle. His brow was knit, his one eye keen and steady.

He was listening to his host discoursing upon the many superiorities of

the artisan in the middle ages to his successor of today. And he seemed

to be weighing and estimating Arthur with some little difficulty.

Then, as if it was a part of the calculation he was making, he turned to

look at Dolly. Their eyes met; for a moment he could not mask himself.

Then he turned to Arthur again with his expression restored to polite

interest.

It was the most trivial of incidents, but it stayed, a mental burr.

§ 6

A little accident which happened a few weeks after Oswald’s departure

put the idea of making a will into Arthur’s head. Dolly had wanted to

ride a bicycle, but he had some theory that she would not need to ride

alone or that it would over-exert her to ride alone, and so he had got a

tandem bicycle instead, on which they could ride together. Those were

the days when all England echoed to the strains of

“_Di_sy, _Di_sy, tell me your answer true;

I’m arf _crizy_

All fer the love of you-oo ...

Yew’d look sweet

Upon the seat

Of-a-bicycle-mide-fer-two.”

A wandering thrush of a cockney whistled it on their first expedition.

Dolly went out a little resentfully with Arthur’s broad back obscuring

most of her landscape, and her third ride ended in a destructive spill

down Ipinghanger Hill. The bicycle brake was still in a primitive stage

in those days; one steadied one’s progress down a hill by the art, since

lost to mankind again, of “back-pedalling,” and Dolly’s feet were

carried over and thrown off the pedals and the machine got away.

Arthur’s nerve was a good one. He fought the gathering pace and steered

with skill down to the very last bend of that downland descent. The last

corner got them. They took the bank and hedge sideways and the crumpled

tandem remained on one side of the bank and Arthur and Dolly found

themselves torn and sprained but essentially unbroken in a hollow of wet

moss and marsh-mallows beyond the hedge.

The sense of adventure helped them through an afternoon of toilsome

return....

“But we might both have been killed that time,” said Arthur with a

certain gusto.

“If we had,” said Arthur presently, expanding that idea, “what would

have become of Peter?”...

They had both made simple wills copied out of _Whitaker’s Almanack_,

leaving everything to each other; it had not occurred to them before

that two young parents who cross glaciers together, go cycling together,

travel in the same trains, cross the seas in the same boats, might very

easily get into the same smash. In that case the law, it appeared,

presumed that the wife, being the weaker vessel, would expire first, and

so Uncle Rigby, who had relapsed more and more stuffily into evangelical

narrowness since his marriage, would extend a dark protection over

Peter’s life. “Lucy wouldn’t even feed him properly,” said Dolly. “She’s

so close and childlessly inhuman. I can’t bear to think of it.”

On the other hand, if by any chance Dolly should show a flicker of life

after the extinction of Arthur, Peter and all his possessions would fall

under the hand of Dolly’s shady brother, the failure of the family, a

being of incalculable misdemeanours, a gross, white-faced literary man,

an artist in parody (itself a vice), who smelt of tobacco always, and

already at thirty-eight, it was but too evident, preferred port and old

brandy to his self-respect.

“We ought to remake our wills and each appoint the same guardian,” said

Arthur.

It was not very easy to find the perfect guardian.

Then as Arthur sat at lunch one day the sunshine made a glory of the

little silver tankard that adorned the Welsh dresser at the end of the

room.

“Dolly,” he said, “old Oswald would like this job.”

She’d known that by instinct from the first, but she had never expected

Arthur to discover it.

“He’s got a sort of fancy for Peter,” he said.

“I think we could trust him,” said Dolly temperately.

“Poor old Oswald,” said Arthur; “he’s a tragic figure. That mask of his

cuts him off from so much. He idolizes you and Peter, Dolly. You don’t

suspect it, but he does. He’s our man.”

CHAPTER THE THIRD

ARTHUR OR OSWALD?

§ 1

Destiny is at times a slashing sculptor. At first Destiny seemed to have

intended Oswald Sydenham to be a specimen of the schoolboy hero; he made

record scores in the school matches, climbed trees higher than any one

else did, and was moreover a good all-round boy at his work; he was

healthy, very tall but strong, dark, pleasant-looking, and popular with

men and women and—he was quite aware of these facts. He shone with equal

brightness as a midshipman; he dared, he could lead. Several women of

thirty or thereabouts adored him—before it is good for youth to be

adored. He had a knack of success, he achieved a number of things; he

judged himself and found that this he had done “pretty decently,” and

that “passing well.” Then Destiny decided apparently that he was not

thinking as freshly or as abundantly as he ought to do—a healthy,

successful life does not leave much time for original thinking—and

smashed off the right side of his face. In a manner indeed quite

creditable to him. It was given to few men in those pacific days to get

the V.C. before the age of twenty-one.

He lay in hospital for a long spell, painful but self-satisfied. The

nature of his injuries was not yet clear to him. Presently he would get

all right again. “V.C.,” he whispered. “At twenty. Pretty decent.”

He saw himself in the looking-glass with half his face bandaged, and

there was nothing very shocking in that. Then one day came his first

glimpse of his unbandaged self....

“One must take it decently,” he said to himself again and again through

a night of bottomless dismay.

And, “How can I look a woman in the face again?”

He stuck to his bandages as long as possible.

He learnt soon enough that some women could not look him in the face

anyhow, and among them was one who should have hidden her inability from

him at any cost.

And he was not only disfigured; he was crippled and unserviceable; so

the Navy decided. Something had gone out of his eyesight; he could no

longer jump safely nor hit a ball with certainty. He could not play

tennis at all; he had ten minutes of humiliation with one of the nurses,

protesting all the time. “Give me another chance and I’ll begin to get

into it. Let me get my eye in—my only eye in. Oh, the devil! give a chap

a chance!... Sorry, nurse. Now!... _Damn!_ It’s no good. Oh God! it’s no

good. What shall I do?” Even his walk had now a little flavour of

precaution. But he could still shoot straight up to two or three hundred

yards.... These facts formed the basis for much thinking on the part of

a young man who had taken it for granted that he was destined to a

bright and leading rôle in the world.

When first he realized that he was crippled and disabled for life, he

thought of suicide. But in an entirely detached and theoretical spirit.

Suicide had no real attraction for him. He meant to live anyhow. The

only question therefore was the question of what he was to do. He would

lie awake at nights sketching out careers that did not require

athleticism or a good presence. “I suppose it’s got to be chiefly using

my brains,” he decided. “The great trouble will be not to get fat and

stuffy. I’ve never liked indoors....”

He did his best to ignore the fact that an honourable life before him

meant a life of celibacy. But he could not do so. For many reasons

arising out of his temperament and the experiences those women

friendships had thrust upon him, that limitation had an effect of

dismaying cruelty upon his mind. “Perhaps some day I shall find a blind

girl,” he said, and felt his face doubtfully. “Oh, damn!” He perceived

that the sewing up of his face was a mere prelude to the sewing up of

his life. It distressed him beyond measure. It was the persuasion that

the deprivation was final that obsessed him with erotic imaginations.

For a time he was obsessed almost to the verge of madness.

He had moods of raving anger on account of this extravagant and

uncontrollable preoccupation. He would indulge secretly in storms of

cursing, torrents of foulness and foul blasphemies that left him

strangely relieved. But he had an unquenchable sense of the need of a

fight.

“I’ll get square with this damned world somehow,” he said. “I won’t be

beaten.”

There were some ugly and dismal aspects in his attempt not to be beaten,

plunges into strange mires with remorse at the far side. They need not

deflect our present story.

“What’s the whole beastly game about anyhow?” he asked. “Why are we made

like this?”

Meanwhile his pride kept up a valiant front. No one should suspect he

was not cheerful. No one should suspect he felt himself to be a thing

apart. He hid his vicious strain—or made a jest of it. He developed a

style of humour that turned largely on his disfigurement. His internal

stresses reflected a dry bitterness upon the world.

It was a great comfort presently to get hints that here and there other

souls had had to learn lessons as hard as his own. One day he chanced

upon the paralyzed Heine’s farewell to beauty. “Perhaps,” he said, “I’ve

only got by a short cut to where a lot of people must come out sooner or

later. Every one who lives on must get bald and old—anyhow.” He took a

hint from an article he found in some monthly review upon Richard

Crookback. “A crippled body makes a crippled mind,” he read. “Is that

going to happen to me?”

Thence he got to: “If I think about myself now,” he asked, “what else

_can_ happen? I’ll go bitter.”

“Something I can do well, but something in which I can forget myself.”

That, he realized, was his recipe.

“Let’s find out what the whole beastly game _is_ about,” he decided—a

large proposition. “And stop thinking of _my_ personal set-back

altogether.”

But that is easier said than done.

§ 2

He would, he decided, “go in for science.”

He had read about science in the magazines, and about its remorseless

way with things. Science had always had a temperamental call upon his

mind. The idea of a pitiless acceptance of fact had now a greater

fascination than ever for him. Art was always getting sentimental and

sensuous—this was in the early ’eighties; religion was mystical and

puritanical; science just looked at facts squarely, and would see a

cancer or a liver fluke or a healing scar as beautiful as Venus.

Moreover it told you coldly and correctly of the skin glands of Venus.

It neither stimulated nor condemned. It would steady the mind. He had an

income of four hundred a year, and fairly good expectations of another

twelve hundred. There was nothing to prevent him going in altogether for

scientific work.

Those were the great days when Huxley lectured on zoology at South

Kensington, and to him Oswald went. Oswald did indeed find science

consoling and inspiring. Scientific studies were at once rarer and more

touched by enthusiasm a quarter of a century ago than they are now, and

he was soon a passionate naturalist, consumed by the insatiable craving

to know how. That little, long upper laboratory in the Normal School of

Science, as the place was then called, with the preparations and

diagrams along one side, the sinks and windows along the other, the row

of small tables down the windows, and the ever-present vague mixed smell

of methylated spirit, Canada balsam, and a sweetish decay, opened vast

new horizons to him. To the world of the eighteen-eighties the story of

life, of the origin and branching out of species, of the making of

continents, was still the most inspiring of new romances. Comparative

anatomy in particular was then a great and philosophical “new learning,”

a mighty training of the mind; the drift of biological teaching towards

specialization was still to come.

For a time Oswald thought of giving his life to biology. But biology

unhappily had little need of Oswald. He was a clumsy dissector because

of his injury, and unhandy at most of the practical work, he had to work

with his head on one side and rather close to what he was doing, but it

dawned upon him one day as a remarkable discovery that neither personal

beauty nor great agility are demanded from an explorer or collector. It

was a picture he saw in an illustrated paper of H. M. Stanley traversing

an African forest in a litter, with a great retinue of porters, that

first put this precious idea into his head. “One wants pluck and a

certain toughness,” he said. “I’m tough enough. And then I shall be out

of reach of—Piccadilly.”

He had excellent reasons for disliking the West End. It lured him, it

exasperated him, it demoralized him and made him ashamed. He got and

read every book of African travel he could hear of. In 1885 he snatched

at an opportunity and went with an expedition through Portuguese East

Africa to Nyasa and Tanganyika. He found fatigue and illness and

hardship there—and peace of nerve and imagination. He remained in that

region of Africa for three years.

But biology and Africa were merely the fields of human interest in which

Oswald’s mind was most active in those days. Such inquiries were only a

part of his valiant all-round struggle to reconstruct the life that it

had become impossible to carry on as a drama of the noble and

picturesque loves and adventures of Oswald Sydenham. His questions led

him into philosophy; he tried over religion, which had hitherto in his

romantic phase simply furnished suitable church scenery for meetings and

repentances. He read many books, listened to preachers, hunted out any

teacher who seemed to promise help in the mending of his life,

considered this “movement” and that “question.” His resolve to find what

“the whole beastly game was about,” was no passing ejaculation. He

followed the trend of his time towards a religious scepticism and an

entire neglect of current politics. Religion was then at the nadir of

formalism; current politics was an outwardly idiotic, inwardly

dishonest, party duel between the followers of Gladstone and Disraeli.

Social and economic questions he was inclined to leave to the

professors. Those were the early days of socialist thought in England,

the days before Fabianism, and he did not take to the new teachings very

kindly. He was a moderate man in æsthetic matters, William Morris left

him tepid, he had no sense of grievance against machinery and aniline

dyes, he did not grasp the workers’ demand because it was outside his

traditions and experiences. Science seemed to him more and more plainly

to be the big regenerative thing in human life, and the mission

immediately before men of energy was the spreading of civilization, that

is to say of knowledge, apparatus, clear thought, and release from

instinct and superstition, about the world.

In those days science was at its maximum of aggressive hopefulness. With

the idea of scientific progress there was also bound up in many British

minds the idea of a racial mission. The long Napoleonic wars had cut off

British thought from the thought of the continent of Europe, and this

separation was never completely healed throughout the nineteenth

century. In spite of their world-empire the British remained remarkably

self-centred and self-satisfied. They were a world-people, and no other

people were. They were at once insular and world-wide. During the

nineteenth century until its last quarter there was no real challenge to

their extra-European ascendancy. A man like Sydenham did not so much

come to the conclusion that the subjugation and civilization of the

world by science and the Anglican culture was the mission of the British

Empire, as find that conclusion ready-made by tradition and

circumstances in his mind. He did not even trouble to express it; it

seemed to him self-evident. When Kipling wrote of the White Man’s

Burden, Briton was understood. Everywhere the British went about the

world, working often very disinterestedly and ably, quite unaware of the

amazement and exasperation created in French and German and American

minds by the discovery of these tranquil assumptions.

So it was with Oswald Sydenham for many years. For three years he was in

the district between Bangweolo and Lake Nyasa, making his headquarters

at Blantyre, collecting specimens and learning much about mankind and

womankind in that chaos of Arab slavers, Scotch missionaries, traders,

prospectors, native tribes, Zulu raiders, Indian store-keepers, and

black “Portuguese”; then, discovering that Blantyre had picked up a

nickname from the natives of “Half Face” for him, he took a temporary

dislike to Blantyre, and decided to go by way of Tanganyika either to

Uganda or Zanzibar, first sending home a considerable collection of

specimens by way of Mozambique. He got through at last to Uganda, after

some ugly days and hours, only to learn of a very good reason why he

should return at once to the southern lakes. He heard that a new British

consul was going up the Zambesi to Nyasaland with a British protectorate

up his sleeve, and he became passionately anxious to secure a position

near the ear of this official. There were many things the man ought to

know at once that neither traders nor mission men would tell him.

To get any official position it was necessary for Oswald to return to

London and use the influence of various allied Sydenhams. He winced at

the thought of coming back to England and meeting the eyes of people who

had known him before his disfigurement, but the need to have some sort

of official recognition if he was to explain himself properly in

Nyasaland made it necessary that he should come. That was in the summer

of 1889.

Joan and Peter: The story of an education · 第 2 / 49 段