SIR,

The charitable construction which has been put upon your _grammatical_

epistle, has _rendered_ me _declinable_ to your complex proposition. As

your presumptuous address, wholly precludes the necessity of an apology

for this abrupt preface; I shall be thereby relieved from an

embarrassment, which the delicacy of the subject would have otherwise

occasioned. The various contradictions visible in your letter, argue a

defect of sincerity. In the first place, you say you would be

_superlatively_ happy to _agree_ with me in the _subjunctive mood_; then

you seem disposed, with an assuming air, so throw in a _conjunction

disjunctive_, and disunite us into various _moods_ and _tenses_. Again

you say that you do not wish to be a _noun adjective_; then, that it is

the _optative_ of your soul, to become a _relative_.--What is a

_relative_ pray, but a _noun adjective?_ You say also, that you trust I

will not opiniate you _singular_: if you are not in the _singular

number_, you must necessarily be in the _plural_. If, then, you have

already formed the _plural number_, by the _interjection_ of a

_copulative conjunction_, connecting you to a _noun substantive_, you

cannot expect, or even wish from me, an accession to your _proposition_.

I candidly declare to you, that a _noun substantive_ in the _singular

number_, is the only _part of speech_ to which I would willingly

_subjoin_ a _copulative conjunction_. Lest you should be disposed to

charge me with assuming the prerogative of your own sex, I shall pass

over many expressions in your letter, which might properly afford a

field for criticism. But let me add, Sir, that as it was an impolite, so

was it a very impolitic thing for you to make use of such unwarranted

freedom, as to make proposals of so immensely great consequence, to a

person, with whom you had so slight an acquaintance. If, previous to the

exhibition of your bold letter, you had perfectly learned my

_disposition_, you must have been sensible, that it would be far from

being _consonant_ with my feelings to admit of a _concord_ with you,

upon conditions so disagreeable as those you offered. Beside, it would

have been by no means a bad plan for you, to have been a little

conversant with my sister _analogy_; as she might have been of

considerable advantage to you in an attempt of this nature: She might,

at least, have supplied you with a _rule_, by which two _noun

substantives_ might have _agreed_ with each other, without transforming

either into a _noun adjective_.

The New-York Weekly Magazine, or Miscellaneous Repository Forming an Interesting Collection of Original and Select Literary Productions in Prose and Verse · 第 550 / 844 题