2 This is John de la Barre, already alluded to in Tale I.

The _Journal d’un Bourgeois de Paris_ tells us that he was

born in Paris of poor parents, and became a favourite of

Francis I., who appointed him Bailiff of the capital,

without requiring him to pay any of the dues attaching to

the office. From the roll of the royal household for 1522,

we also find that he was then a gentleman of the bed chamber

with 1200 _livres_ salary, master of the wardrobe (a post

worth 200 _livres_) and governor of the pages, for the board

and clothing of whom he received 5000 _livres_ annually. In

1526 he became Provost as well as Bailiff of Paris, the two

offices then being amalgamated. He was further created Count

of Etampes, and acquired the lordship of Veretz, best

remembered by its associations with the murder of Paul Louis

Courier. La Barre fought at Pavia, was taken prisoner with

the King, and remained his constant companion during his

captivity. Several letters of his, dating from this period

and of great historical interest, are still extant; some of

them have been published by Champollion-Figeac (_Captivité

de François Ier_) and Génin (_Lettres de Marguerite, &c_).

Under date 1533 (o. s.) the “Bourgeois de Paris” writes in

his _Journal_: “At the beginning of March there died in

Paris, at the house of Monsieur Poncher, Monsieur le Prévost

de Paris, named de La Barre.... The King was then in Paris,

at his chateau of the Louvre, and there was great pomp at

the obsequies; and he was borne to his lordship of Veretz,

near Tours, that he might be buried there.” Numerous

particulars concerning La Barre will also be found in M. de

Laborde’s _Comptes des Bâtiments du Roi au XVIeme Siècle_.--

L. and Ed.

He told the latter his plan, which was approved both by the Prince and

by two other great personages of the Court, all three agreeing together

to share in the spoil.

While they were looking for a fourth comrade, there arrived a handsome

and honourable lord who was ten years younger than the others. He

was invited to the banquet, but although he accepted with a cheerful

countenance, in his heart he had no desire for it. For on the one part

he had a wife who was the mother of handsome children, and with whom he

lived in great happiness, and in such peacefulness that on no account

would he have had her suspect evil of him. And on the other hand he was

the lover of one of the handsomest ladies of her time in France, whom

he loved and esteemed so greatly that all other women seemed to him ugly

beside her.

In his early youth, before he was married, he had found it impossible to

gaze upon and associate with other women, however beautiful they might

be; for he took more delight in gazing upon his sweetheart, and in

perfectly loving her, than in having all that another might have given

him.

This lord, then, went to his wife and told her secretly of the

enterprise that his master had in hand, saying that he would rather die

than do what he had promised. For (he told her) just as there was no

living man whom he would not venture to attack in anger, although he

would rather die than commit a causeless and wilful murder unless his

honour compelled him to it; even so, unless driven by extreme love, such

as may serve to blind virtuous men, he would rather die than break his

marriage vow to gratify another.

On hearing these words of his, and finding that so much honour dwelt

in one so young, his wife loved and esteemed him more than she had ever

done before, and inquired how he thought he might best excuse himself,

since Princes often frown on those who do not praise what they like.

“I have always heard,” he replied, “that a wise man has a journey or

a sickness in his sleeve for use in time of need. I have therefore

resolved that I will feign a grievous sickness four or five days

beforehand, and in this matter your countenance may render me true

service.”

“Tis a worthy and holy hypocrisy,” said his wife, “and I will not fail

to serve you with the saddest face I can command; for he who can avoid

offending God and angering the Prince is fortunate indeed.”

As it was resolved, so was it done, and the King was very sorry to hear

from the wife of her husband’s sickness. This, however, lasted no

long time; for, on account of certain business which arose, the King

disregarded his pleasure to attend to his duty, and betook himself away

from Paris.

However, one day, remembering their unfinished undertaking, he said to

the young lord:--

“We were very foolish to leave so suddenly without seeing the four girls

who are declared to be the fairest in my kingdom.”

“I am very glad,” replied the young lord, “that you failed in the

matter, for I was in great fear that, by reason of my sickness, I should

be the only one to miss so pleasant an adventure.”

By reason of this answer the King never suspected the dissimulation of

the young lord, who was thenceforward loved by his wife more dearly than

he had ever been before.

Hereupon Parlamente began to laugh, and could not hold from saying--

“He would have loved his wife better if he had done this for love of her

alone. But in any case he is worthy of great praise.”

“It seems to me,” said Hircan, “that it is no great merit in a man

to keep his chastity for love of his wife, inasmuch as there are many

reasons which in a manner compel him to do so. In the first place, God

commands it; his marriage vow binds him to it, and, further, surfeited

nature is not liable to temptation or desire as necessity is. But when

the unfettered love that a man bears towards a mistress of whom he has

no delight, and no other happiness save that of seeing her and speaking

with her, and from whom he often receives harsh replies--when this love

is so loyal and steadfast that nothing can ever make it change, I say

that such chastity is not simply praiseworthy but miraculous.”

“‘Tis no miracle in my opinion,” said Oisille, “for when the heart is

plighted, nothing is impossible to the body.”

“True,” said Hircan; “to bodies which have become those of angels.”

“I do not speak only of those,” said Oisille, “who by the grace of God

are wholly transformed into Himself, but of the grosser spirits that

we see here below among men. And, if you give heed, you will find that

those who have set their hearts and affections upon seeking after the

perfection of the sciences, have forgotten not only the lust of the

flesh, but even the most needful matters, such as food and drink; for

so long as the soul is stirred within the body, so long does the flesh

continue as though insensible. Thence comes it that those who love

handsome, honourable and virtuous women have such happiness of spirit in

seeing them and speaking with them, that the flesh is lulled in all its

desires. Those who cannot feel this happiness are the carnally-minded,

who, wrapped in their exceeding fatness, cannot tell whether they have a

soul or not. But, when the body is in subjection to the spirit, it is

as though heedless of the failings of the flesh, and the beliefs of such

persons may render them insensible of the same. I knew a gentleman who,

to show that he loved his mistress more dearly than did any other man,

proved it to all his comrades by holding his bare fingers in the

flame of a candle. And then, with his eyes fixed upon his mistress, he

remained firm until he had burned himself to the bone, and yet said that

he had felt no hurt.”

“Methinks,” said Geburon, “that the devil whose martyr he was ought to

have made a St. Lawrence of him; for there are few whose love-flame is

hot enough to keep them from fearing that of the smallest taper. But

if a lady had suffered me to endure so much hurt for her sake, I should

either have sought a rich reward or else have taken my love away from

her.”

“So,” said Parlamente, “you would have your hour after the lady had

had hers? That was what was done by a gentleman of the neighbourhood

of Valencia in Spain, whose story was told to me by a captain, a right

worthy man.”

“I pray you, madam,” said Dagoucin, “take my place and tell it us, for I

am sure that it must be a good one.”

“This story, ladies,” said Parlamente, “will teach you both to think

twice when you are inclined to give a refusal and to lay aside the

thought that the present will always continue; and so, knowing that it

is subject to mutation, you will have a care for the time to come.”

[Illustration: 132.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 133a. The Lady Swooning in the Arms of the Gentleman of

Valencia who had become a Monk]

[The Lady Swooning in the Arms of the Gentleman of Valencia who had

become a Monk]

[Illustration: 133.jpg Page Image]

_TALE LXIV_.

_After a lady had for the space of five or six years made

trial of the love that a certain gentleman bore her, she

desired to have a still stronger proof of it, and reduced

him to such despair that he turned monk, on which account

she was not able to win him back again when she would fain

have done so_.

In the city of Valencia there lived a gentleman, who for the space of

five or six years had loved a lady so perfectly that the honour and

conscience of neither of them had taken any hurt; for his intent was

to have her as his wife, and this was reasonable, seeing that he was

handsome, rich and of good descent. But, before he became her lover, he

first inquired concerning her own mind, whereupon she declared herself

willing to marry according to the counsels of her kinsfolk. The

latter, being come together for the purpose, deemed the marriage a very

reasonable one provided that the maiden was herself disposed to it; but

she--whether because she thought to do better or because she wished to

hide her love for him---made some difficulty, and the company separated,

not without regret at having failed to conclude a match so well suited

to both parties.

The most grieved of all was the poor gentleman, who would have borne

his misfortune with patience had he thought that the fault lay with the

kinsfolk and not with her; but he knew the truth, and the knowledge was

to him worse than death. So, without speaking to his sweetheart or to

any other person, he withdrew to his own house, and, after setting his

affairs in order, betook himself to a solitary spot, where he strove to

forget his love and change it wholly to that love of our Lord which were

truly a higher duty than the other.

During this time he received no tidings of his mistress or her kindred,

and he therefore resolved that, since he had failed to obtain the

happiest life he could hope for, he would choose the most austere and

disagreeable that he could imagine. With this sad intent, which

might well have been called despair, he went and became a monk in the

monastery of St. Francis. This monastery was not far from the dwellings

of divers of his kinsfolk, who, on hearing of his desperate condition,

did all that in them lay to hinder his purpose; but this was so firmly

rooted in his heart that it was not possible to turn him from it.

Nevertheless, as the source of his distemper was known to them, they

determined to seek the cure, and so repaired to her who was the cause

of his sudden devoutness. She was greatly astonished and grieved by this

mischance, for, in refusing for a time, she had thought only to test his

affection, not to lose it for ever. Seeing now the evident risk that she

ran of doing this last, she sent him a letter, which, ill-translated,

was as follows:--

“Since love, if tested not full needfully,

Steadfast and faithful is not shown to be,

By length of time my heart would that assay

Whereon itself was set to love alway--

To wit, a husband with that true love filled

Such as no lapsing time has ever killed.

This, then, was the sole reason that I drew

My kin to hinder for a year or two

That closest tie which lasts till life is not,

And whereby woe is oftentimes begot.

Yet sought I not to have you wholly sent

Away; such was in no wise my intent,

For none save you could I have e’er adored

Or looked to as my husband and my lord.

But woe is me, what tidings reach mine ear!

That you, to lead the cloistered life austere,

Are gone with speech to none; whereat the pain

That ever holds me, now can brook no rein,

But forces me mine own estate to slight

For that which yours aforetime was of right;

To seek him out who once sought me alone,

And win him who myself has sometimes won.

Nay then, my love, life of the life in me,

For loss of whom I fain would cease to be,

Turn hither, graciously, those eyes of pain

And trace those wandering footsteps back again.

Leave the grey robe and its austerity,

Come back and taste of that felicity

Which often you desired, and which to-day

Time has nor slain, nor swept away.

For you alone I’ve kept myself; and I,

Lacking your presence, cannot choose but die.

Come back then; in your sweetheart have belief,

And for past memories find cool relief

In holy marriage-ties. Ah! then, my dear,

To me, not to your pride give ready ear,

And rest of this assured, I had no thought

To give, sweetheart, to you offence in aught,

But only yearned your faithfulness to prove

And then to make you happy with my love.

But now that through this trial, free from scathe,

Are come your steadfastness and patient faith,

And all that loyal love to me is known,

Which at the last has made me yours alone,

Come, my beloved, take what is your due

And wholly yield to me, as I to you!”

This letter, brought by a friend of hers with every remonstrance that it

was possible to make, was received and read by the gentleman friar with

such sadness of countenance, such sighs and such tears, that it seemed

as though he would drown and burn the poor epistle. But he made no

reply to it, except to tell the messenger that the mortification of his

exceeding passion had cost him so dear as to have taken from him both

the wish to live and the fear to die. He therefore requested her who

had been the cause of this, that since she had not chosen to satisfy

his passionate longings, she would, now that he was rid of them, abstain

from tormenting him, and rest content with the evil which was past. For

that evil he could find no remedy but the choice of an austere life,

which by continual penance might bring him to forget his grief, and, by

fasts and disciplines, subdue his body, till the thought of death should

be to him but a sovereign consolation. Above all, he begged that he

might never hear of her, since he found the mere remembrance of her name

a purgatory not to be endured.

The gentleman went back with this mournful reply, and reported it to the

maiden who did not hear it without intolerable sorrow. But Love, which

will not suffer the spirit utterly to fail, gave her the thought that,

if she could see him, her words and presence might be of more effect

than the writing. She therefore, with her father and the nearest of her

kin, went to the monastery where he abode. She had left nothing in her

box that might set off her beauty, for she felt sure that, could he but

once look at her and hear her, the fire that had so long dwelt in both

their hearts must of necessity be kindled again in greater strength than

before.

Coming thus into the monastery towards the end of vespers, she sent for

him to come to her in a chapel that was in the cloister. He, knowing not

who it was that sought him, went in all ignorance to the sternest battle

in which he had ever been. When she saw him so pale and wan that she

could hardly recognise him, yet filled with grace, in no whit less

winning than of yore, Love made her stretch out her arms to embrace him,

whilst her pity at seeing him in such a plight so enfeebled her heart,

that she sank swooning to the floor.

The poor monk, who was not void of brotherly charity, lifted her up and

set her upon a seat in the chapel. Although he had no less need of

aid than she had, he feigned to be unaware of her passion, and so

strengthened his heart in the love of God against the opportunities now

present with him, that, judging by his countenance, he seemed not to

know what was actually before him. Having recovered from her weakness,

she turned upon him her beautiful, piteous eyes, which were enough to

soften a rock, and began to utter all such discourse as she believed apt

to draw him from the place in which he now was. He replied as virtuously

as he was able; but at last, finding that his heart was being softened

by his sweetheart’s abundant tears, and perceiving that Love, the cruel

archer whose pains he long had known, was ready with his golden dart to

deal him fresh and more deadly wounds, he fled both from Love and from

his sweetheart, like one whose only resource lay, indeed, in flight.

When he was shut up in his room, not desiring to let her go without some

settlement of the matter, he wrote her a few words in Spanish, which

seem to me so excellent in their matter that I would not by translating

them mar their grace. These were brought to her by a little novice,

who found her still in the chapel and in such despair that, had it been

lawful, she too would have remained there and turned friar. But when she

saw the words, which were these--

“Volvete don venesti, anima mia,

Que en las tristas vidas es la mia,” (1)

she knew that all hope was gone, and she resolved to follow the advice

of him and her friends, and so returned home, there to lead a life as

melancholy as that of her lover in his monastery was austere.

1 “Return whence thou earnest, my soul,

for among the sad lives is mine.”’

“You see, ladies, what vengeance the gentleman took upon his harsh

sweetheart, who, thinking to try him, reduced him to such despair that,

when she would have regained him, she could not do so.”

“I am sorry,” said Nomerfide, “that he did not lay aside his gown and

marry her. It would, I think, have been a perfect marriage.”

“In good sooth,” said Simontault, “I think he was very wise. Anyone who

well considers what marriage is will deem it no less grievous than

a monkish life. Moreover, being so greatly weakened by fasts and

abstinence, he feared to take upon him a burden of that kind which lasts

all through life.”

“Methinks,” said Hircan, “she wronged so feeble a man by tempting him

to marriage, for ‘tis too much for the strongest man alive; but had she

spoken to him of love, free from any obligation but that of the will,

there is no friar’s cord that would not have been untied. However, since

she sought to draw him out of purgatory by offering him hell, I think

that he was quite right to refuse her, and to let her feel the pain that

her own refusal had cost him.”

“By my word,” said Ennasuite, “there are many who, thinking to do better

than their fellows, do either worse or else the very opposite of what

they desire.”

“Truly,” said Geburon, “you remind me--though, indeed, the matter is

not greatly to the point--of a woman who did the opposite of what she

desired, and so caused a great uproar in the church of St. John of

Lyons.”

“I pray you,” said Parlamente, “take my place and tell us about it.”

“My story,” said Geburon, “will not be so long or so piteous as the one

we have heard from Parlamente.”

[Illustration: 141.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 143a. The Old Woman startled by the Waking of the Soldier]

[The Old Woman startled by the Waking of the Soldier]

[Illustration: 143.jpg Page Image]

_TALE LXV_.

_Though the priests of St. John of Lyons would fain have

concealed it, the falsity of a miracle was brought to light

through an old woman’s folly becoming known_. (1)

In the church of St. John of Lyons there is a very dark chapel, and

inside it a stone tomb with figures of great personages raised life-like

upon it, whilst several men-at-arms lie all around it.

1 We believe that the incident here narrated occurred early

in 1525, when Margaret is known to have been at Lyons. She

and her husband (on his return from Pavia) resided there at

the house of the Obédiencier de St. Just, and it was in the

church of St. Just that the Duke of Alençon was buried.

Doubtless it was during his illness that the _novena_

alluded to in the final tale of the _Heptameron_ was

performed by Queen Margaret at the church of St. John of

Lyons, where the two most important chapels, according to

Quincarnon’s _Antiquités et la fondation de la Métropole

des Gaules, &c._, Lyons, 1673, were the Most Holy Eucharist,

or Bourbon chapel, built in 1449 by Charles de Bourbon,

Primate of Gaul, and the Holy Sepulchre, or Good Friday

chapel, erected at the beginning of the fifteenth century by

Philip de Turey, Archbishop of Lyons. Unfortunately the

church of St. John was in 1652 devastated by the Huguenots,

who in their insensate fury destroyed almost all the tombs.

It is therefore now impossible to identify the chapel and

tomb to which the Queen of Navarre refers in the above

story, though her allusion to the dimness of the light would

incline us to place the incident she recounts in the

Chapelle du St. Sépulcre.--L. and Ed.

One day a soldier, walking in the church at the very height of summer,

felt inclined to sleep, and, looking at this dark, cool chapel, resolved

to go and guard the tomb in sleep like the rest; (2) and accordingly he

lay down beside them. Now it chanced that a very pious old woman came

in while his sleep was the soundest, and having performed her devotions,

holding a lighted taper in her hand, she sought to fix this taper to the

tomb. Finding that the sleeping man was nearest to her, she tried to set

it upon his forehead, thinking that it was of stone; but the wax would

not stick to such stone as this, whereupon the worthy dame, believing

that the reason of it was the coldness of the statue, applied the flame

to the sleeper’s forehead, that she might the better fix the taper on

it. At this, however, the statue, which was not without feeling, began

to cry out.

2 Meaning the recumbent statues of the men-at-arms.--Ed.

The good woman was then in exceeding fear, and set herself to shout, “A

miracle! a miracle!” until all who were in the church ran, some to ring

the bells, and the rest to view the miracle. The good woman forthwith

took them to see the statue that had stirred, whereupon many found food

for laughter; though the greater number were unable to feel any content,

inasmuch as they had really determined to make profit out of the tomb,

and to gain as much money by it as by the crucifix on their pulpit,

which is said to have spoken. (3) But when the woman’s folly became

known the farce came to an end. If all knew of their follies, they would

not be accounted holy nor their miracles true. And I would beg you,

ladies, to see henceforward to what saints you offer your candles. (4)

3 The crucifix in the church of St. John was mainly of

silver, and, according to Quincarnon, at the time of a

Huguenot outbreak at Lyons it was thrown to the ground by a

Calvinist minister named Ruffy, who, after reducing it to

fragments, carried all the precious metal away with him.--M.

4 The latter portion of this story and all the dialogue

that follows it are omitted by Boaistuau in his edition.

Gruget inserted the dialogue, but he did not dare to print

the passage respecting the talking crucifix.--L.

“‘Tis notable,” said Hircan, “that, whatever the matter in question may

be, women always do wrong.”

“Is it wrong,” asked Nomerfide, “to bring candles to a tomb?”

“Yes,” said Hircan, “if the flame be turned against a man’s forehead;

for nothing good should be called good if it be attended with evil. You

may be sure that the poor woman thought she had made a fine gift to God

with her little candle.”

“I look not to the gift,” said Oisille, “but to the heart that offers

it. Perhaps this worthy woman had more love for God than those who offer

great torches; for, as the Gospel says, she gave of her need.”

“Still, I no not believe,” said Saffredent, “that God, who is sovereign

wisdom, can be pleased with the foolishness of women. Although

simplicity is pleasing to Him, I see from the Scriptures that He

despises the ignorant; and if He commands us to be as harmless as the

dove, He none the less commands us to be wise like the serpent.”

“For my part,” said Oisille, “I do not call the woman ignorant who

brings her candle or burning taper into the presence of God, and makes

amends for her wrongdoing on bended knees before her sovereign Lord,

confessing her unworthiness and with steadfast hope seeking pity and

salvation.”

“Would to God,” said Dagoucin, “that all understood it in the same way

as you; but I do not believe that these poor fools do it with the intent

you say.”

“The women,” said Oisille, “who are least able to speak are just those

who are most sensible of the love and will of God; wherefore ‘tis well

to judge none but ourselves.”

The Tales of the Heptameron, Vol. 5 (of 5) · 第 6 / 11 段