Book 1914, pp. 330-362.

Dunn, Arthur W., "The Community and the Citizen," chaps, v, vi.

CHAPTER X

WHY GOVERNMENT HELPS IN HOME MAKING

Our nation requires healthy citizens, intelligent citizens,

prosperous and happy citizens. The home can do more to produce

them than any other community agency. Therefore the nation is wise

to look after its homes.

RELATION OF HOME CONDITIONS TO INDUSTRY

People cannot do their work well if they live in unwholesome or

unpleasant homes. This was made clear during the recent war. The

lack of suitable living places for workmen and their families was

one of the chief obstacles to shipbuilding and munitions

manufacture during the early part of the war. England found this

out as well as the United States, and one of the first things both

countries had to do was to take measures to provide proper home

conditions for those who were engaged in supplying the nation's

needs. During the first year of the war our Congress appropriated

$200,000,000 to build houses for industrial workers.

The problem of securing good physical conditions of home life has

naturally been greatest in crowded industrial centers, but it is

by no means absent in small communities, or even in the open

country. One writer describes a certain farmhouse where five

people were accustomed to sleep in one not very large bedroom,

which had only one small window, and even that was nailed shut,

one of these five had incipient tuberculosis. These people were

well-to-do farmers, living in a large twelve-room, stone house and

simply crowded into one room for the sake of mistaken economy--

presumably to save coal and wood.

Many such cases could be described, not only in the more remote

and backward regions, but even in prosperous farming communities.

What is the result of this overcrowding and lack of proper housing

in the country? Just exactly the same as in the great cities--lack

of efficiency, disease, and premature death to many ... While the

great majority of people subjected to overcrowding and bad housing

conditions do not prematurely die, yet they have a lessened

physical and mental vigor, are less able to do properly their

daily work, and not only become a loss to themselves and their

families, but to the state ... [Footnote: Bashore, "Overcrowding

and defective housing in the rural districts," quoted in Nourse,

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, pp. 118, 119, 121.]

STRENGTH OF THE NATION DEPENDS ON THE HOME

Some of our states and many of our cities have laws to regulate

housing conditions, but such laws seldom apply to small

communities. In cities where people live crowded together in

closely built city blocks, unsanitary conditions in one home

endanger the health of the entire community. There is also danger

from fire, and vice and crime may breed and spread quickly and

unseen. The community is driven, therefore, in its own defense, to

regulate the people's housing. In small communities, and

especially in rural communities, where homes are more widely

separated and in some cases quite isolated, it has seemed of

little concern to others how one citizen builds his home and what

he does in it. Thoughtful consideration of such cases as that

described above, however, must convince us that it IS a matter of

national concern what happens even in remote homes. Both the

physical and the economic strength of the nation are undermined by

unwholesome conditions in the separate homes of the land.

COMMUNITY PLANNING

Economic loss to the community may result not merely from

UNWHOLESOME home conditions, but also from INCONVENIENCE of

location and arrangement of the homes. A good deal of attention is

being given to "community planning" in the United States and

especially in England and other European countries. Community

planning includes not only provision for the proper location and

construction of public buildings and streets, for water supply,

lights, parks, etc., but also for the convenient, as well as

wholesome and pleasant location of homes. Large cities, like

London, New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago, have spent enormous

sums of money in city planning after they have already grown up

without plan. It has necessitated destroying old structures and

widening streets. Villages and small towns are in a position to

introduce a plan for future growth without this needless expense.

Our beautiful capital city of Washington has grown according to a

plan that was carefully laid out before a building was erected.

But even in Washington one of the greatest problems the city had

to face during the war was that of providing homes for the

enormous number of workers who came to the city to do the work of

the government.

PLANNING THE FARMSTEAD

"The need of careful arrangement in country homes is much more

urgent than in city homes for the reason that country people use

their homes as the business center of their profession," says

Prof. R.J. Pearce, of Iowa State College. "The farmer in his

business center must not only produce enough raw material to

provide for him self and family, but he needs to produce enough to

feed and clothe the entire human race." "CONSERVATION OF SPACE

must be taken into consideration to obtain the greatest results

from our high-priced land; CONVENIENCE must be a prime factor when

expensive labor is at a premium; and ATTRACTIVENESS must be one of

the chief motives not only to make farm property more saleable but

to give greater enjoyment to the owner and his family..." "A

farmstead is, but a unit in a farming community, yet travelers

form an impression of the entire community by individual farm

homes which they see in passing. Therefore, not only financial

consideration but personal pride and a feeling of community spirit

and enterprise should urge the farm owner to develop his farmstead

according to the best of modern methods."

What facts can you find in regard to what the government did to

provide homes for workers in shipbuilding or munitions plants

during the war?

In many of the war industries preference was given to men with

families in employing workmen. Why was this?

In some rural communities in the United States a "teacherage"

(home for the teacher) is provided. Of what advantage to the

community is this?

Is there a "housing problem" in your community?

Are there any laws in your state regulating the building of homes?

If so, what are some of them? Do they apply in your community? Are

they carefully observed and enforced?

Make a study of the arrangement of the buildings on farms with

which you are familiar, drawing diagrams, and report whether or

not they are well planned with reference to ECONOMY OF SPACE

occupied, CONVENIENCE, and ATTRACTIVENESS. Consider

(a) Are they properly placed with reference to the highway?

(b) Are they conveniently placed in relation to one another?

(c) Are they suitably protected from the prevailing winds? How?

(d) What makes them attractive or unattractive?

(e) Are the stables properly situated to protect the health of the

family? How?

Must a home be large and costly to be attractive?

What impression would a stranger get in regard to the "community

spirit" of your community from the appearance of its homes? Would

he be right?

THE HOME AND COMMUNITY STABILITY

Home ownership is one of the strongest influences that give

permanence and stability to the community. The census taken by the

United States government every ten years shows that home ownership

has been decreasing throughout the country as a whole. The

decrease has been greatest in cities, but it is true also of

farmhome ownership. In 1880 only 25% of the farms of the United

States were occupied by tenants (renters); in 1910, 37% were so

occupied. It is true that in the ten years from 1900 to 1910 there

was a slight increase in the proportion of farms owned by their

occupants in the New England and Middle Atlantic states, and in a

large part of the West; but the increase in these parts was more

than overbalanced by the decrease in the South Atlantic and Gulf

states and in the Mississippi Valley. The smallest proportion of

farm tenancy is found in New England (8%), and the largest in the

southern states (45.9% in the South Atlantic states, and more than

50% in the South central states). A large part of the farming in

the South is done by negroes, most of whom are either laborers on

the farms of the white population or tenants on small farms which

they usually work on shares. And yet the number of negro farm

owners in the South has been rapidly increasing in the last few

years, though not so rapidly as the number of tenants. In 1910

negro farm owners cultivated nearly 16,000,000 acres of land in

the South, all of which they have acquired since the Civil War.

EFFECTS OF DECLINE OF HOME OWNERSHIP

The decline in home ownership both in the cities and in the rural

districts of the United States has been observed with considerable

anxiety because of the effect upon our national welfare and upon

the citizenship of the country. One writer says:

Farming is a permanent business; it is no "fly by night"

occupation. ... No man can pull up stakes and leave a farm at the

close of the year without sacrificing the results of labor which

he has done ... The renter who ends harvest knowing that he will

move in the spring, will not do as good a job of hauling manure

and fall plowing as he would were he to stay; nor does he take as

good care of the buildings and other improvements ...

The cost to the farming business of the country each year for this

annual farm moving-week mounts into the millions of dollars. And

the pity of it all is that practically no one is the winner

thereby ... The renter loses, the landlord loses, the general

community and the nation at large lose. [Footnote: W.D. Boyce, in

an editorial in THE FARMING BUSINESS, February 26, 1916, quoted in

Nourse, AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, p. 651.]

Tenant farming also places obstacles in the way of community

progress in other ways.

The tenant takes little interest in community affairs. The

questions of schools, churches, or roads are of little moment to

him. He does not wish to invest in enterprises which will of

necessity be left wholly ... to his successor. In short, he is in

the community, but hardly of it. [Footnote: B.H. Hibbard, "Farm

Tenancy in the United States," in Annals of the American Academy

of Political and Social Science, March, 1912, p. 39.]

A family that owns its home feels a sense of proprietorship in a

part of the community land. The money value of a home increases in

proportion to the prosperity of the community as a whole; its

owner will therefore be inclined to do all he can to promote the

welfare of the community. A community that is made up largely of

homes owned by their occupants is likely to be more prosperous and

more progressive, and its citizens more loyal to it, than a

community whose families are tenants.

THE TENANT AS A CITIZEN

While all that has been said in the preceding paragraph is true,

it must not be thought that tenancy is necessarily a bad thing in

all cases, nor that a man who does not own his home cannot be a

thoroughly good citizen. There are circumstances that make it

necessary for many families to live in dwellings that they do not

own. Tenancy may be a step toward home ownership. A citizen may

have insufficient money to buy a farm, but enough to enable him to

rent one. By industry, economy, and intelligence, he may soon

accumulate means with which to buy the farm he occupies or some

other. The increase in the number of tenants in the Southern

States is due in large part to the breaking up of many larger

plantations into small farms which are occupied by tenants, many

of them negroes. That many of these tenants are on the road to

home ownership is indicated by the facts stated on page 117.

It is as much the duty of the home renter as it is of the home

owner to take an interest in the community life in which he and

his family share, and to cooperate with his neighbors for the

common good. While he lives in the community he is largely

dependent upon it, like any other citizen, for the satisfaction of

his wants. Its markets and its roads are his for the

transportation and disposal of his produce and stock. He gets the

benefit of its schools for the education of his children. He may

share in its social life if he cares to do so. His property is

protected by the same agencies that protect that of his neighbors.

He cannot, therefore, escape the responsibility of contributing to

the progress of his community to the extent of his ability.

TEAMWORK BETWEEN LANDLORD AND TENANT

It is as much the duty of the man who rents a farm as it is of the

man who owns one to make his farm produce to its full capacity, to

protect the soil from exhaustion and the buildings and fences from

destruction. But on the other hand, it is the duty of the

landlord, both as a good business man and as a good citizen, to

make such terms with his tenant that the latter will take an

interest in the farm and will find it profitable to farm properly.

There must be team work.

The landlord must be interested not only in his land but in his

tenant. The tenant must be interested not only in himself but in

his landlord and his land. A system that favors the tenant to the

injury of the land is bad. A system that favors the land to the

injury of the tenant is equally harmful. Either system will result

in the poverty of both the landlord and the tenant. [Footnote: Dr.

Seaman A. Knapp, quoted by Dr. Thomas Jesse Jones in "Negroes and

the Census of 1910," p 16. (Reprint from THE SOUTHERN WORKMAN for

August, 1912.)]

The fact remains, however, that home ownership contributes to the

permanence, the stability, and the progress of a community. It is

also a fact that conditions have developed in our country, both in

cities and in rural communities, which make home ownership

increasingly difficult. In another chapter (Chapter XIV) we shall

see what some of these conditions are, and what our government has

done and may do to overcome them.

THE HOME A SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP

One of the most important services performed for the community by

the home is that of training its members for citizenship. The

family has been called "a school of all the virtues" that go to

make good citizenship. It is a school in which not only the

children, but also the parents, not only the boys and men, but

also the girls and women, receive training by practice. In the

home are developed thoughtfulness for others, a spirit of self-

sacrifice for the common good, loyalty to the group of which the

individual is a member, respect for the opinions of others of long

experience, a spirit of teamwork, obedience to rules which exist

for the welfare of all. If these and other qualities of good

citizenship are not cultivated in the home, it is not in a healthy

condition nor performing its proper service to the community.

Moreover, the exercise of these virtues in the home is not only

training for good citizenship; it IS good citizenship. If the home

is as important a factor in our national life as this chapter has

indicated, then one of the greatest opportunities for good

citizenship, and one of the greatest duties of good citizenship,

is that of making the home what it should be; and in this each

member of the family has his or her share.

Make a study of farm tenancy in your locality (neighborhood,

township, or county).

How many of the farms of the locality are occupied and operated by

their owners? how many by tenants? What is the percentage of

tenancy?

To what extent are the tenants men who were formerly farm

laborers, but who by renting farms are making a start on their own

account? Is this a sign of progress?

What percentage of the tenants are white? negro?

To what extent are the tenants foreigners who have recently come

to the locality?

Are the tenant farms usually rented for long periods or for short

periods?

What is the system of tenancy in your locality (i.e. cash rental,

working on shares, partnership with the owner, etc.)? If more than

one exists, which seems to work best? Why?

Is tenancy increasing or decreasing in your locality? What reasons

are given for this?

Does experience in your locality support the statement that tenant

farmers are less likely than others to interest themselves in

community progress?

If you live or go to school in town, make a study of home

ownership in the town. (If a small community, the class may study

the entire area; if large, different sections may be studied by

different groups of pupils.) How many homes are occupied by their

owners? how many by tenants? What is the percentage of tenancy? Is

tenancy increasing or decreasing? For what reasons?

Is there some section of the community where most of the people

own their homes, and another section where most of the people

rent? If so, do you notice any difference in the general

appearance of the two sections? Do you think that the difference,

if any exists, is due in any part to the fact that some own and

others rent their homes?

Is there a tendency for the farmers of your locality to move into

town? If so, why? What becomes of their farms?

Review the points made in the discussion of topics 4 and 5 on page

38 (Chapter III). Continue to develop plans for cooperation in the

home and school.

What does it mean to be "in training" for athletics? In the light

of your answer to this question, what would it mean to be "in

training" for citizen ship?

READINGS

See Readings for Chapter IX. Also:

"Housing the Worker on the Farm," Department of Agriculture Year

Book, 1918, pp. 347-356.

"What the Department of Agriculture is Doing for the Housekeeper,"

Department of Agriculture Year Book, 1913, pp. 143-162.

"The Effect of Home Demonstration on the Community and the

County," Department of Agriculture Year Book, 1916, pp. 251-266.

"Farm Tenantry in the United States," Department of Agriculture

Year Book, 1916, pp. 321-346.

Lessons in Community and National Life: Series C, Lesson 32,

"Housing for Workers."

CHAPTER XI

EARNING A LIVING

LIVING, NOT EARNING, THE END IN VIEW

The most conspicuous activities that we see going on in the

community are usually those that have to do with earning a living

or the production of wealth. [Footnote: The activities by which we

earn a living are also the activities by which wealth is produced.

It is important to understand that when we speak of "wealth" we do

not necessarily mean GREAT wealth. A boy who has a fifty-cent

knife, or a girl who has a twenty-five-cent purse, has wealth as

truly as the man who owns a well-stocked farm. The difference is

merely in kind and amount. Food, clothing, houses, books, tools,

cattle, are all forms of wealth. ANY material thing, for which we

are willing to work and make sacrifices because it satisfies our

wants, is wealth. Earning a living is merely earning or producing

wealth to satisfy our wants and those of others.] Indeed, some

people become so absorbed in the business of earning a living that

they seem to be LIVING TO EARN rather than EARNING TO LIVE. It

does not do to forget that not EARNING, but LIVING, is the real

end in view. Unless we know how to use what we earn to provide

properly for all of our normal wants, the effort we spend in

earning is very largely wasted.

Nevertheless, before we can enjoy a living it has to be earned, by

ourselves or by someone else; and the activities by which it is

earned occupy so important a place in our lives, are so closely

dependent upon the community, have so much to do with our

citizenship, and receive so much attention from government, that

we must give them some consideration in this chapter and several

chapters following.

IMPORTANCE OF VOCATIONAL LIFE

While young people are spending most of their time at school or at

play, their fathers and other grown people are usually chiefly

occupied in the business of making a living or "earning money."

[Footnote: Gold and silver and paper and wood are forms of wealth.

Out of wood we make a yardstick or a peck measure with which TO

MEASURE QUANTITIES of cloth or grain. In a similar manner, out of

gold, silver, paper, and other materials, we make money, and for a

similar reason, viz. to MEASURE THE VALUE of wealth. When we speak

of a FIFTY-CENT KNIFE and a TWENTY-FIVE CENT PURSE, we measure the

value of these articles. It would take thousands of DOLLARS to

measure the value of a well-stocked farm.

When we say that a boy earns a dollar, or that a man earns $4.00 a

day, we measure the value of his work or his service. If a man

works for a farmer, he very likely receives his "board and

lodging" in part payment for his services; he makes a direct

exchange of his services for food and shelter. But he also

probably receives in addition an amount of money, because with the

money he can buy clothes and other things that the farmer cannot

give. He takes the money and buys with it these other things that

he needs to supply his wants. Thus money becomes something more

than a measure of wealth or of services; it is also A MEANS OF

EXCHANGING WEALTH OR SERVICES.

These are the two uses of money. Money has value only because of

what it represents in wealth, and wealth is useful because it

enables us to satisfy wants. These things are mentioned because it

is quite important that we should never forget that "money" and

"wealth" are worth working for only because of the "living," or

life, that they help us to attain.]

Children are, as a rule, wholly dependent upon their parents for

their living. But during their period of dependence they are

gaining skill and experience, in school and otherwise, that will

later enable them to earn their own living and that of other

people who may, in turn, become dependent upon them.

As adult life approaches, there comes an increasing desire for

independence of others, to have possessions, own property, or

accumulate wealth. Our VOCATIONS, or occupations, by which we earn

a livelihood, come to occupy a prominent place in our thought, and

to a large extent control our activity. Doubtless most of those

who read this chapter have begun to think more or less seriously

about what they are going to do for a living. Some may be already

doing so, in part, or helping to earn that of their families. Boys

and girls who live on farms are especially likely to have a share

in the work by which the family living is provided; but most boys

and girls have more or less regularly "earned money," even if they

have not considered it necessary for their living. An inquiry in a

large, first-year high school class disclosed the fact that the

girls of the class, quite as much as the boys, were thinking of

their choice of vocation. More avenues are open to girls to-day

than formerly by which to earn their living outside of the family;

but even the management of a home is a business as truly as the

management of a farm or factory, and is an exceedingly important

factor in the earning of the family living.

What part, if any, do you have in helping to earn the family

living?

What have you done during the past year to earn money (a) out of

school hours on school days, (b) on Saturdays, (c) in vacation

time? Tabulate the results for the entire class.

What vocation would you like to follow for life? Why?

If you have not decided upon some one vocation, name several that

seem attractive to you. Why are they attractive?

What do you know about the opportunities and the qualifications

necessary for success in the vocations you have named? How may you

proceed to find out more about them?

What vocations offer special opportunities for girls and women to-

day? How do these opportunities compare with those when your

mothers were girls?

Make a list of the occupations of the fathers (or other members of

the families) of the members of your class.

Make a list of as many occupations in your community (town or

county) as you can think of.

DEPENDENCE OF THE PIONEER

Our dependence upon others for a living by no means ends with

childhood. There is no such thing as an entirely "self-made man,"

by which is meant a man who has been successful entirely by his

own efforts. It is true that the primitive hunter and the pioneer

farmer were independent of others to an unusual extent. But their

living was a meager one, and they could not accumulate much

wealth. The very land that a pioneer occupies, even though it is

extensive and fertile, has little value as long as it is remote

from centers of population.

Even if a pioneer laid claim to a large tract of land, he could

produce little wealth from it in crops if he could get no help to

cultivate it, or if he had no improved machinery (made by others);

and whatever he produced, he and his family could eat but little

of the product. He could feed some to his few animals, and he

would save some for seed; but anything that he raised above what

he could actually use would have no value unless he could get it

to other people who wanted it. If he could not sell what he

produced, neither could he buy from others what they produced to

satisfy other wants than that for food. So the kind of living a

person enjoys, and the amount of wealth he accumulates, depend

largely upon other people, and upon the community in which he

lives.

DEPENDENCE OF THE MODERN FARMER

Under present-day conditions, a farmer who raises wheat probably

uses none of it himself. He sells his entire crop for the use of

others, while to supply himself and his family with bread he goes

to the store and buys flour that may have been milled in Minnesota

from wheat raised by other farmers, perhaps in North Dakota or

South Dakota. In exchange for his wheat he also gets clothing

manufactured in New York or New England from cotton raised in

Georgia or Texas, or from wool grown in Montana. He buys a wagon

made in Indiana from lumber cut in the South and iron mined in

Michigan and smelted in Ohio. Thus he earns his living by

producing food for other people, while the things he uses in

living are the product of labor expended by other people in the

effort to earn THEIR living. We noticed in Chapter II how many

people and occupations were concerned in producing a pair of

shoes.

EARNING BY SERVICE

While the farmer or other worker may be interested primarily in

providing for his own wants and those of his family, he can do

this only by producing something or performing service for others;

and while each worker may be most concerned about WHAT HE RECEIVES

for his work, the community is most concerned about WHAT HE

PRODUCES. Earning a living has two sides to it: rendering service

to others and being paid for the service rendered. It is as if the

community entered into a sort of agreement with the worker to the

effect that it will provide him with a living in return for

definite service to the community or for the product of his labor.

What we call "business" is SELLING A SERVICE. It may be personal

service, such as teaching, or prescribing medicine, or nursing, or

giving legal advice, or cutting hair, or driving a team, or

running an automobile. Or it may be purchasing, storing,

retailing, and delivering things which have been produced perhaps

many hundreds or thousands of miles away. Or it may be raising

foodstuffs on the farm, or mining fuels and metals from the earth,

or cutting timber from the forest. Or it may be manufacturing--

buying materials and converting them into products serviceable to

others. Whatever it is, every man's business is also the

community's business, and the community has a right to expect

industry and honest, efficient work from every worker.

Discuss the occupations named in answer to the two questions on

page 26, from the point of view of their service to the community.

To what extent is your father's business or occupation dependent

upon the business or occupation of the fathers of other members of

the class?

Show how your father's business is also the community's business.

What is the price of land in your neighborhood? Consult your

father or friends in regard to the increase or decrease in price

in recent years and in regard to the reasons for it.

LIVING WITHOUT EARNING

There are exceptional cases where people RECEIVE a living without

EARNING it. One class of such people is represented by thieves,

gamblers, swindlers, and persons engaged in occupations that are

positively harmful to the community. Such people may be very

skillful and they may work hard enough, but they take what others

have earned without producing anything of value to the community.

Then there are those who are incapable of productive work because

of physical defects, or through the feebleness of old age. It is

the duty of every citizen to provide, as far as possible, during

his productive years, for the "rainy day" of misfortune or

advancing age. For those who cannot do so, the community must

provide.

Very young children are users of wealth produced by others. It is

expected, however, that children will in later years make return

to the community for what they have received during their period

of dependence.

INHERITED WEALTH

Some people inherit wealth, or otherwise come into possession of

it without effort on their part. The wealth so received, however,

has been earned by someone, or has come from the community in some

way. If the person who so receives it uses it in a way that is

highly useful to the community, he may in a sense earn it even

after he receives it; but if he uses it solely for his own

enjoyment, without effort to make it highly useful to the

community, he does not in any sense earn it, and places himself in

the class of those who are wholly dependent upon the community.

UNFAIR COMPENSATION FOR SERVICE

On the other hand, there are people who do not get for their work

a living that fairly compensates them for the service they render

by it to the community. If our community life were perfectly

adjusted in all its parts; if all the people clearly recognized

their common interests and their interdependence; if they had the

spirit of cooperation and were wise enough to devise smoothly

working machinery of cooperation;--then the returns that a worker

received for his work would be closely proportionate to the

service rendered by his work. That is, he would GET what he

EARNED, so far as wages or profits were concerned. But this is one

of the particulars in which our community life is still imperfect.

Where so many different kinds of workers are engaged in producing

shoes, for example, it is extremely difficult to determine how

much each should be paid for his share of the work. What WAGES

should be given to the different classes of workers who care for

cattle, make the leather, manufacture the machines with which the

shoes are made, operate the machines, mine the coal and iron for

the production of the machines, and so on? What PROFITS shall be

allowed to the men who raise the cattle, to the merchants who sell

the shoes and the machines, and to the transportation companies

that carry them from the factories to the dealers? What INTEREST

shall be received by the men who furnish the CAPITAL necessary to

run the factories and the farms? These questions relating to the

DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH that men produce have proved very difficult

to answer satisfactorily.

A very useful and interesting, but rather difficult, science has

grown up to explain the PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND USE OF

WEALTH. It is called the SCIENCE OF ECONOMICS. Of all the

divisions of this science, that relating to the distribution of

wealth is the most perplexing. It is the inequalities in the

distribution of wealth, the sense of injustice produced by these

inequalities, and sometimes a failure to understand what a fair

distribution is, that have caused all the labor disputes referred

to in Chapter VII (p. 71), and the discontent sometimes felt by

farmers and other producers in regard to the prices of their

products.

Have you ever heard any one say, "The world owes me a living"? Is

this a true statement? If so, in what sense do you think it is

true?

Which do you think is the truer statement: "I have a right to a

living," or "I have a right to earn a living"? Discuss the

difference.

A thief has been known to say, "I was brought into the world

without my own consent; therefore the world owes me a living, and

I owe the world nothing." Is this good argument? Did the people

upon whom he depends for a living have any more to say about their

being brought into the world than he had?

What things are you using to-day that were not provided for you by

others?

If a stranger should come to your community to-day to live, what

are some of the things that he would find already provided by the

community for his use in making a living?

Name five important inventions and state what they have done for

you.

Would you say that the world owes Thomas A. Edison and Luther

Burbank a living? Why?

How are you indebted for your living to the pioneers who settled

your state? to Robert Fulton? to the men who built the first

transcontinental railroad?

Can you think of some way in which your family is indebted for its

living to the British nation? to France? to ancient Greece? to the

Phoenicians? to the people of Brazil?

Which is the greater, the debt of your family to the world or the

debt of the world to your family?

What is a "parasite"? Could this term be appropriately applied to

any of the people referred to in the last few paragraphs of the

text above?

GOVERNMENT INTERESTED IN PRODUCTION

Each citizen has a right to feel that the government is interested

in his individual prosperity and happiness; and it is, for unhappy

and discontented citizens are seldom good citizens. But the

government represents community as a whole, and has the interest

of the community as a whole in its keeping rather than the

interest of particular individuals. Its interest is primarily in

what each citizen PRODUCES, for it is upon this that the strength.

of the nation depends.

THE "NATIONAL SERVICE ARMY" OF PRODUCERS

A few days after war was declared against Germany, the President

made an appeal to his fellow producers countrymen, in which he

said:

It is evident to every thinking man that our industries on the

farms, in the shipyards, in the mines, in the factories, must be

made more prolific and more efficient than ever and that they must

be more economically managed and better adapted to the particular

requirements of our task than they have been; and what I want to

say is that the men and women who devote their thought and their

energy to these things will be serving the country and conducting

the fight for peace and freedom just as truly and just as

effectively as the men on the battlefield or in the trenches. The

industrial forces of the country, men and women alike, will be a

great national, a great international Service Army,--a notable and

honored host engaged in the service of the nation and the world ...

Thousands, nay, hundreds of thousands, of men otherwise liable

to military service will of right and necessity be excused from

that service and assigned to the fundamental, sustaining work of

the fields and factories and mines, and they will be as much part

of the great patriotic forces of the nation as the men under fire.

He then appealed directly to every kind of worker in the country,

and to the farmers he said:

The supreme need of our own nation and of the nations with which

we are cooperating is an abundance of supplies, and especially of

foodstuffs. ... Without abundant food ... the whole great

enterprise upon which we have embarked will break down and fail ...

Upon the farmers of this country, therefore, in large measure,

rests the fate of the war and the fate of nations. Let me suggest,

also, that every one who creates or cultivates a garden helps, and

helps greatly, to solve the problem of the feeding of the nations;

and that every housewife who practices strict economy puts herself

in the ranks of those who serve the nation.

The nation needs the productive work of each citizen in time of

peace as truly as in time of war, although when it is not fighting

for its very life it is more tolerant of those who do not

contribute efficiently by their work to the common good. It

carries them along somehow. But such members of the community are

a burden and a source of weakness at all times. Therefore, for

example, there are in most of our communities laws against

vagrancy; that is, against willful and habitual idlers "without

visible means of support," such as beggars and tramps.

PROBLEM OF THE UNEMPLOYED

There are times when many men are "out of work." In times of

business depression the number may become very great, while in

prosperous times the number dwindles; but always there are some.

It is often through no fault of their own; it is another result of

the imperfect adjustment of our community life. It often happens

that while large numbers of men are unable to find work in

industrial centers, the farmers may be suffering for want of help.

This may be merely because there is no way by which to let workmen

know where they are needed, or of distributing them to meet the

need. Or, many of the unemployed may be unskilled, while the

demand is for skilled workmen; or they may be skilled in one line,

while the demand is in another line. Whatever the causes, the

"problem of the unemployed" is one of the most serious that the

community has to deal with. During the war the national government

sought to overcome these difficulties by the organization of an

employment service in the Department of Labor, and state and local

communities established employment bureaus.

Who have been some of the builders of your own community by reason

of their business life? Explain.

So far as you have observed, what boys have been most successful

after leaving school--those who make it a practice to do all they

can for their employers, or those who have tried to do the least

possible?

Is it true in your community that the most useful citizens are

those who care more about the excellence of their work than about

what they receive for it?

Are there many vagrants in your community? Are there laws against

vagrancy? If so, what are they?

Are there often many men out of work in your community? If so, why

is it?

Is it ever difficult to get farm labor in your locality? If so,

how do the farmers explain it?

What experience have the farmers of your locality had during and

since the war in getting labor when it was needed? Did the

government help them at that time? How?

It is of the greatest importance both to the individual and to the

community that every citizen: (1) should be continuously employed

in a useful occupation, (2) should be free and able to choose the

occupation for which he is best fitted, and in which he will be

happiest, and (3) should be thoroughly efficient in his work,

whatever it is.

THE RIGHT OF THE COMMUNITY TO INDUSTRY

(1) The community has a right to expect every citizen to be

industrious and productive, for only in this way can he be self-

sustaining and at the same time contribute his share to the well-

being of the community. Doubtless all who read this chapter are

desirous of doing useful work. At the same time, it is easy for

any of us to fall into the habit of thinking more about what we

can GET than about what we can GIVE. There ARE people who

habitually seek to do as little as possible for what they receive,

or to get all they can for the least possible service. This

applies not only to idlers who live entirely off the community

without any service on their part, but also to those who have

employment, but who seek to evade, by "time-serving" and otherwise

"slacking," the full responsibility of service. We sometimes hear

complaint in regard to public officials who draw good salaries

without rendering adequate or honest public service in return, and

to such we frequently apply the term of "grafter." But the

principle is exactly the same when any person who has undertaken

to do a piece of work fritters away his time or "loafs on the

job."

SATISFACTION IN SERVICE

After all, the chief return that we get for our work is not the

wages or the profits, important as they are to us, but the

satisfaction of doing something that is worthwhile. If this

pleasure is absent from the work we do, no amount of money returns

can compensate us for it. The happy man is a busy man, an

industrious man; and his happiness is more in the doing than in

the mere fact of money returns.

IMPORTANCE OF A RIGHT CHOICE

(2) The value of our work to the community and the pleasure that

we derive from it both depend to a large extent upon our fitness

for it. It is important to choose our work carefully. There are

four important considerations in choosing a vocation: (a) its

usefulness to the community, (b) one's own fitness for it, (c)

one's happiness in it, and (d) whether it offers an adequate

living to one's self and dependents. The last of these is, of

course, a most important consideration. What a person receives for

his work ought to be determined by the first two considerations,

i.e. the usefulness of the work to the community and one's fitness

for it. We have seen that this is not always true. In such cases

it often becomes necessary to make a further choice--a choice

between working primarily for one's own profit and working

primarily for the satisfaction that comes from important service

well rendered. It is not always easy to make this choice; but

there are many people who have sacrificed large incomes for the

sake of doing work that the community needs and for which they

consider themselves well fitted.

A CHOICE OF VOCATION IS INEVITABLE

Many people seem to have little choice in the matter of vocation.

The farmer's boy has to work on the farm whether he wants to or

not; and many a man is a farmer apparently for no other reason

than that he was raised on the farm and has seen no opportunity to

do anything else. Other people seem to be forced into other

occupations by circumstances or drift into them by chance. But

even in these cases there is something of a choice. The farmer's

boy "chooses" to remain on the farm rather than to take the

chances involved in running away, or because he would rather be at

home than in a strange city. The discontented farmer might have

chosen to be a lawyer if he had been willing to make enough

sacrifices to get ready for it; and even now he "chooses" to

remain on the farm in spite of his dislike for it because to do

otherwise would mean sacrifice of some kind or other that he is

unwilling to make.

THE MEANING OF OUR WORK TO THE COMMUNITY

The pleasure and effectiveness of ANY work, however, are increased

if its importance to the community or to the world is clearly

understood; for ALL productive work is important. There is no more

terrible work than that of the soldier in the trenches. No man

would voluntarily choose it for his own pleasure. But millions of

men have gone into it joyfully because of the results to be

attained for their country and the world. Other millions of men

and women, and even children, on the farms, in the mines, in the

shops, and in the homes, worked and sacrificed during the war with

Germany as they had never worked and sacrificed before, produced

results such as had never been produced before, and doubtless

experienced a satisfaction in their toil that they had never

experienced before, because each one saw more definitely than

before the relation of his work to the great national and world

purpose. An understanding of the meaning of our work in its

relation to community welfare goes a long way toward "transmuting

days of dreary work into happier lives."

FREEDOM, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE

The opportunity to choose one's calling, to decide what service

one will fit himself for, the right of "self-determination" with

regard to what one's work shall be--this is what "freedom" means.

This is why men are happier when they are free. The "equality" and

"justice" that all men want mean EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE

that which they like to do, and AN EQUAL CHANCE TO MAKE A LIVING,

or to obtain compensation for their labor or enterprise. It is for

these things more than for anything else that people have left

old-world conditions and come to America. The ability to make a

living under conditions of freedom and justice depends in part

upon the common wants of the community, and upon the willingness

of members of the community to pay for the satisfaction of their

wants enough to enable those who perform service for them also to

satisfy theirs. But it also depends upon the ability of the

individual to make a choice, and upon his willingness to spend

years in preparation, if need be, to enable him to offer a service

of the kind he likes to render, and for which others are glad to

pay well.

A DAY OF SPECIALISTS

We are living in a day of specialists. The very nature of our

interdependent life makes it necessary for each worker to do one

thing and to do it exceedingly well. Even farming is broken up to

a considerable extent into special kinds of farming. Moreover,

since the worker must be a specialist, requiring long, special

training, it is more difficult than it used to be for him to

change from one occupation to another after he has once started.

Each person, therefore, owes it both to himself and to the

community to choose his vocation carefully, so far as he has

opportunity to make a choice. The schools are more and more making

it their business to give boys and girls the knowledge and the

experience that will enable them to choose wisely their mode of

earning a living.

THE NECESSITY FOR TRAINING

(3) Whether a citizen follows a vocation of his own voluntary

choice, or one into which he has fallen by chance or by force of

circumstances, he is under obligation to the community as well as

to himself to do his work well. In these days of specialization

this inevitably means preparation, training. If the community

expects the citizen to perform efficient service, it must afford

him a fair opportunity for preparation. During the war the

government made special provision for training, not only for

military service, but also for the industrial occupations that the

nation needed. Vocational training is now receiving great

attention from the schools and from government.

HASTY ENTRANCE UPON VOCATIONAL LIFE

As in the choice of a vocation, so in preparation for it the

individual has his share of responsibility. It is always a

temptation for young people to get out into the active work of the

world at the earliest possible moment. The desire to be

independent, to earn one's own living, to "make money," is strong.

It leads many boys and girls to leave school even before they have

finished their elementary education. In the great majority of

cases this results in serious economic loss both to the boy or

girl and to the community. The charts on page 137 furnish evidence

of this.

PATRIOTISM IN VOCATIONAL LIFE

We call it patriotism when a man gives all that he has, even his

life if necessary, for the good of his country, without stopping

to consider whether or not he will receive an equal benefit in

return. There is no higher type of patriotism than that which

prompts a citizen to perform his best service for the community in

his daily calling, not for what he can get for it, but for what he

can give. This patriotism is shared by the young citizen who is

willing to defer an apparent immediate gain to himself in order to

prepare himself thoroughly for more effective service later.

If your father had his life to live over again, would he choose

the same vocation that he is now following? Consult him as to his

reasons.

What special kinds of farming exist in your locality? Is there a

tendency in your community toward specialization in farming, or

toward general farming? Reasons?

To what extent is "scientific farming" practiced in your locality?

What does it mean?

Make a study of the extent to which specialization is necessary in

the industries of your town.

Does your school offer any vocational training or vocational

guidance?

Is there a tendency in your school for boys and girls to quit

before completing the course? At what grades do pupils begin to

drop out in considerable numbers? Why do they leave? What sort of

work do they do when they leave school?

At what ages does the law in your state permit boys and girls to

go to work? Show how this restriction of freedom now increases

freedom later on.

READINGS

In Lessons in Community and National Life:

Series A: Lesson 3, The cooperation of specialists in modern society.

Lesson 5, The human resources of a community.

Lesson 7, Organization.

Lesson 8, The rise of machine industry.

Lesson 9, Social control.

Lesson 10, Indirect costs.

Lesson 11, Education as encouraged by industry.

Lesson 23, The services of money.

Lesson 28, The worker in our society.

Series B: Lesson 8, Finding a job.

Lesson 11, The work of women.

Lesson 28, Women in industry.

Series C: Lesson 9, Inventions.

Lesson 11, The effects of machinery on rural life.

Lesson 21, Before coins were made.

Lesson 22, The minting of coins.

Lesson 23, Paper money.

Lesson 24, Money in the community and the home.

Lesson 29, Child labor.

In Long's American Patriotic Prose:

Frank A. Vanderlip, "Service Leads to Success," pp. 347-348.

Charles M. Schwab, "Opportunity is Plentiful in America," pp. 348-

350.

Tufts, The Real Business of Living, Chapters viii-x; xv-xxviii.

The following books relating to vocational life may be helpful and

stimulating if available:

Gowin and Wheatley, Occupations (Ginn & Co.).

Giles, Vocational Civics (Macmillan).

Gulick, The Efficient Life (Doubleday, Page & Co.).

Reid and others, Careers for the Coming Men (Saalfield Pub Co.,

Akron, Ohio).

Marden, Choosing a Career (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis).

Marden, Talks with Great Workers (Thos. Y. Crowell).

Bok, Successward (Doubleday, Page & Co.).

Williams, How it Is Made, How it Is Done, How it Works (Thos.

Nelson & Sons).

Fowler, Starting in Life (Little, Brown & Co.).

Parsons, Choosing a Vocation (Houghton Mifflin Co.).

Carnegie, The Empire of Business, (Doubleday Page & Co.).

CHAPTER XII

GOVERNMENT AS A MEANS OF COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE

GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

According to the census of 1910, somewhat more than 38 million of

the 92 million people of our country at that time were engaged in

"gainful occupations"; that is, in earning their living and that

of the remaining 54 million people who were dependent upon them.

Of the 38 million, more than 13 1/2 million were producing wealth

directly from the land, in agriculture, forest industries, mining

industries, and fishing. About 10 1/2 million were engaged in

manufacturing and mechanical trades, by which the materials

extracted from the land are transformed into articles of use. The

remainder of the "breadwinners" were engaged in trade and

transportation, and in professional, personal, and public service.

IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE

Of the 13 1/2 million people gaining their living directly from

the land, more than 12 1/2 million were engaged in agricultural

pursuits. At the present time (1919) probably one half of the

population, including women and children, is directly dependent

upon agriculture as a means of livelihood, while the other half,

as well, is dependent upon it for food supply and the materials

for clothing.

In view of the fact that agriculture is the source of the nation's

food supply and of a large part of the national wealth, and that

so large a part of the people are engaged in it as a means of

livelihood, it is not surprising to find our government deeply

interested in it and performing a vast amount of service for its

promotion.

STATE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE

The government of every state in the Union has an organization to

protect and promote the farming industry and the welfare of the

farmer. This organization differs in its form and in the extent of

service performed in the several states, due partly to the varying

importance of agriculture in the different states, and partly to

the varying success with which the people and their

representatives have dealt with the problem. In some of the states

there are departments of agriculture, equal in dignity and power

with the other main divisions of the government. In others

agricultural interests are placed in the hands of subordinate

boards, bureaus, or commissions. In some cases the officials in

charge of the organization, such as the commissioner of

agriculture, are elected directly by the people, while in others

they are appointed by the governor of the state or by the

legislature. Often the department is organized in numerous

branches with specialists at the head of each. Thus, there are

dairy commissioners, horticultural boards, livestock sanitary

boards, foresters, entomologists (specialists in insect life in

its relation to agriculture), and others, to look after every

aspect of farming. In a constantly decreasing number of states the

powers of the agricultural officers are slight and their work

ineffectual; but in others the organization is thorough and the

work efficiently done and of the greatest value to the state.

DUTIES OF STATE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE

In general, state departments of agriculture have had two kinds of

duties: first, regulative and administrative duties, such as the

enforcement of laws relating to agriculture passed by the state

legislature, enforcing quarantine against diseased animals,

establishing standards for the grading of grain, making and

enforcing rules for the control of animal and plant diseases, and

similar matters. Second, investigative and educational duties,

such as the investigation of animal and plant diseases, crop

conditions, and other agricultural problems; and the distribution

of information to the farmers and to the people of the state

generally, relating to agricultural matters. Reports and bulletins

on special subjects are published and farmers' institutes are

conducted.

AGRICULTURAL COLLEGES AND EXPERIMENT STATIONS

The practice is growing, however, to transfer the work of

investigation and education to the STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGES AND

EXPERIMENT STATIONS which have been established and are conducted

with the cooperation of the national Department of Agriculture.

These institutions have a corps of highly trained specialists and

educators and are equipped with laboratories and experimental

farms where research may be carried on under the most favorable

conditions. The agricultural colleges not only educate young men

and women within their walls in agriculture and related subjects,

but carry on EXTENSION WORK throughout the state for the benefit

of the farmers and the people of rural communities. With the

development of these institutions the state department of

agriculture is left with almost purely administrative and

regulative duties. This seems to be the wiser plan of

organization.

Write to your state commissioner of agriculture or to the

secretary of your state board of agriculture for a copy of the

law, or other published document, containing a description of the

organization of your state department of agriculture and its work.

Also ask for, if available, a list of publications issued by the

department, from which you may later select such as may seem to be

useful.

Write to your state agricultural college, or to the experiment

station, for its latest report showing the work that it has done,

and for a list of available publications.

In writing to public officials for materials for class use, it is

well to send but ONE letter for the class or school, and to

request THE SMALLEST NUMBER OF COPIES that will serve the purposes

of the class. Public officials are busy people, and the

publications for which you ask cost the people of the community

money.

The members of the class may compete, if desired, in formulating a

suitable letter, and a class committee may select the best, or

formulate one on the basis of suggestions from the class.

Materials collected in this way should become school property, and

the class should be conscious that it is accumulating a library

for later classes as well as for themselves. Study and report on

the following:

The organization of your state department of agriculture, its

officers and how chosen, its divisions and their work.

The work done at your state experiment station (individual reports

may be made on the several important lines of work, or on

particular investigations or discoveries of interest).

The character of the extension courses offered by your state

agricultural college. Courses given in your own community.

Instances of regulative work done in your state and county by your

state department of agriculture.

Instances in which your county or locality has been served by your

state agricultural college or by the experiment station.

The difficulty of the farmer in coping with animal disease or

plant disease by his own effort.

Facts to show that money has been saved to your community by the

state agricultural department or experiment station.

Why the people of the cities of your state should pay taxes to

support the department of agriculture.

Facts to show that your state department of agriculture and your

experiment station are really "means of cooperation" in your state

and county.

Extent to which the farmers of your locality actually cooperate

through the governmental machinery of the department of

agriculture.

Consult your parents or farmer friends as to ways in which the

work of your state department of agriculture, agricultural

college, or experiment station should be extended.

Sentiment among the people of your locality, especially the

farmers, as to the usefulness of your department of agriculture,

experiment station and agricultural college.

Get information from your county agent, or from your state

agricultural college, as to the states having the best organized

departments of agriculture, and then get information as to their

points of excellence.

The advantage of a state fair (A) to the farmer, (B) to the state.

The fair as a means of cooperation.

The management of your county fair (if any).

AGRICULTURE A NATIONAL ENTERPRISE

It does one state very little good to fight hog cholera or the

boll weevil unless neighboring states do likewise. Inferior

service in one state by its department of agriculture is a

detriment not only to the farmers of that state, but to those of

other states and of the country as a whole. States gradually learn

from one another and frequently adopt from one another the best

methods that are developed. This is a slow process. The

agriculture of our nation must be considered as a great national

enterprise, and not as forty-eight separate enterprises. This was

made evident during the recent war. Hence the necessity for

national control.

EARLY NATIONAL SUPPORT OF AGRICULTURE

Washington and Jefferson, like other founders of our nation, took

the keenest interest in agriculture. But in the early years of our

history little was done by the national government for its

promotion, except by a rather generous policy of disposing of the

public lands (see Chapter XIV). In 1820 a committee on agriculture

was for the first time created in the House of Representatives,

and in 1825 a similar committee in the Senate. In 1839 Congress

made its first appropriation for agricultural purposes, $1000, to

be spent in gathering information about crops and other

agricultural matters. This was a small beginning when compared

with the $37,000,000 appropriated by Congress for agricultural

purposes in 1918.

CREATION OF DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

The United States Department of Agriculture was created by

Congress in 1862, though it was not placed on an equality with the

other executive departments of the national government, with a

member of the President's cabinet at its head, until 1889. While

it has some very important regulatory powers, that is, powers to

enforce laws and otherwise to control the practice of the people,

its service has been largely by way of scientific investigation of

the problems of agriculture and the distribution of the

information so acquired. Its policy has been one of cooperation

with state authorities.

NATIONAL COOPERATION WITH THE STATES

In 1862 Congress gave to the several states portions of the public

lands, the proceeds from which were to be used for the

establishment and support of the agricultural colleges of which

mention has been made. Again, in 1887, Congress made

appropriations for the establishment of the agricultural

experiment stations, which are conducted cooperatively by the

state and national governments. In 1914 the Smith-Lever Act was

passed by Congress, making appropriations for agricultural

extension work to be conducted by the state agricultural colleges

with the cooperation of the Department of Agriculture. By the

terms of this act each state must appropriate a sum of money for

the extension work equal to that received from the national

government.

THE STATES RELATIONS SERVICE of the Department of Agriculture

supervises and administers these cooperative relations with the

states under the terms of the Smith-Lever Act. In each state there

is a director of extension work who represents both the United

States Department of Agriculture and the state agricultural

college. Under him there is usually a state agent or leader,

district agents, county agents, and specialists of various kinds.

The county agents conduct agricultural demonstration work in their

counties and assist in organizing rural communities for

cooperation. Women county agents, or home demonstration agents,

are rapidly being installed also, to conduct extension work in

home economics and organize cooperation among the women.

In the Southern States during 1915 about 110,000 farmers carried

out demonstration work under the supervision of county agents.

Each such farm demonstration serves as an object lesson for the

entire community. These demonstrations included corn raising in

446,000 acres, cotton in 202,000 acres, tobacco in 2630 acres,

small grains in 196,000 acres, and many other products in hundreds

of thousands of acres. Stumps were removed from more than 70,000

acres, 220,000 acres were drained, and there were 29,000

demonstrations in home gardens. Sixty-four thousand improved

implements were bought. Work was done with orchards involving more

than 2,000,000 trees, 29,000 farmers were instructed in the care

of manure with an estimated saving of more than 3,000,000 tons.

Farmers in 678 cooperative community organizations were advised

with regard to the purchase of fertilizers with a saving in cost

of $125,000. One thousand six hundred fifty-four community

organizations were formed to study local problems and to meet

local business needs. Nearly 63,000 boys were enrolled in corn

clubs.

There were also in the Southern States 368 counties with home

demonstration agents, who gave instruction to 32,613 girls and

6871 women. Each of the girls produced a one tenth acre home

garden of tomatoes and other vegetables. They put up more than

2,000,000 cans of fruit and vegetables worth $300,000. There were

nearly 10,000 members in poultry clubs and 3000 in bread clubs.

Two hundred fifty women's community clubs were formed.

Similar work was done in the Northern States, where 209,000 boys

and girls were enrolled in club work. Nearly 25,000 of these were

engaged in profit-making enterprises in which they produced food

worth more than $500,000. Reports from 3155 homes show 546,515

quarts of fruits and vegetables canned, about half of which

consisted of vegetables, windfall apples, and other products that

frequently go to waste.

How much money does your state receive from the national treasury

under the terms of the Smith-Lever Act? (Discuss at home, consult

your county agent.)

Find out from your county agent, and from your home demonstration

agent (if there is one), what their work includes and how it is

done. Invite them to speak to your school on the subject.

What demonstration work is being carried on in your county for men

and women? Results achieved?

With the help of your county agent, make a map of your county

showing the distribution of his demonstration work.

Report on boys' and girls' club work in your county. Describe

particularly any such work in which you are engaged.

What are some of the problems in regard to which the farmers of

your community need help?

Make a report on George Washington the Farmer; on Thomas

Jefferson's contributions to agriculture.

THE OFFICE OF MARKETS AND RURAL ORGANIZATION promotes the

organization of rural communities for cooperation in buying and

selling, in obtaining rural credits and insurance (see Chapter

XIII), in developing means of communication (Chapter XVIII), and

in providing for social needs. It investigates markets and methods

of marketing, and transportation and storage facilities.

It seeks to establish standards for grading and packing fruits,

vegetables, and other products.

THE OFFICE OF FARM MANAGEMENT investigates and promotes the

application of business methods to farm management and farm

practice. It studies the cost and profitableness of producing

particular crops, livestock, and dairy products, the use of the

woodlot, the most economic and effective farm equipment. It

investigates the cost of the farmer's living, methods of keeping

accounts, the methods and results of tenantry.

THE BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY investigates the causes, prevention,

and treatment of diseases of domestic animals, and has done much

to eradicate them. It studies methods of dairying and dairy

manufacturing, of breeding and feeding livestock, of producing

wool and other animal fibers, of poultry raising. It cooperates

with the States Relations Service and the state agricultural

colleges in educational work, conducting livestock demonstration

work and advising with regard to the establishment and management

of creameries and cheese factories. It promotes the organization

of pig clubs to stimulate interest in swine production.

THE BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY investigates the causes, prevention,

and treatment of plant diseases, including those of fruit, shade,

and forest trees. It has introduced over 43,000 varieties of

foreign seeds and plants, from which many new industries have

grown up amounting in value to many millions of dollars each year.

Its explorers have brought new varieties of cereals from Russia

and Siberia; alfalfas from Siberia; date palms from North Africa,

Arabia, and Persia; the pistachio nut from Greece and Sicily;

vanilla and peaches from Mexico; barleys and hops from Europe;

rices and matting rushes from Japan; forage grasses from India;

tropical fruits from South America. It experiments in the breeding

of hardy and disease-resisting grains, fruits, and vegetables,

studies soil fertility, investigates the medicinal qualities of

plants, tests seeds, and improves agricultural implements. Its

experiments are conducted in experimental gardens in Washington,

D.C., at Arlington, Va., and at the experiment stations

distributed widely over the United States.

This bureau does much educational work, instructing farmers how to

control plant diseases and how to organize for cooperation in the

breeding of disease-resisting plants, and conducting

demonstrations on reclaimed lands in arid regions. During 1916 it

distributed, through members of Congress, 356,000 tulip and

narcissus bulbs, 96,000 strawberry plants of 15 varieties, 14,000

packages of lawn grass seed, and more than 16,000,000 packages of

vegetable and flower seeds.

THE BUREAU OF CHEMISTRY studies the influence of environment on

crops and plants; investigates the quality of mill products, the

methods of bread making, of tanning leather, and of paper making.

It tests the food values of all kinds of products, the keeping

quality of poultry, eggs, and fish in the course of

transportation, and the composition of drugs. It is called upon by

other departments of government to make chemical analysis of many

articles.

THE BUREAU OF SOILS investigates the quality of soils and their

adaptation to different kinds of crops, and the fertilizer sources

of the country.

THE BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY is concerned with the study of insects

and their relation to agriculture, including those that are

destructive to fruit, shade, and forest trees. Its work includes

the study and promotion of bee culture. It has carried on a

campaign for the eradication of such diseases as spotted fever,

malaria, and typhoid which are carried by ticks, mosquitoes,

flies, and other insects (see Chapter XX).

THE BUREAU OF BIOLOGICAL SURVEY maintains game, mammal, and bird

reservations, including among others the Montana National Bison

Range, the winter elk refuge in Wyoming, the Sully's Hill National

Game Preserve in South Dakota, and the Aleutian Islands

Reservation in Alaska. It studies the food habits of North

American birds and mammals in relation to agriculture,

horticulture, and forestry, and the habits, geographical

distribution, and migrations of animals and plants. It conducts

experiments and demonstrations in destroying animals harmful to

agriculture and animal husbandry and in connection with rearing

fur-bearing animals. It cooperates with local authorities in the

protection of migratory birds.

THE BUREAU OF CROP ESTIMATES gathers and publishes data regarding

agriculture, and particularly estimates relating to crop and

livestock, production.

THE WEATHER BUREAU is in charge of the forecasting of the weather,

the issuing of storm warnings, the display of weather and flood

signals for the benefit of commerce, agriculture, and navigation

(see Chapter XVI).

THE FOREST SERVICE has in its keeping the great national forests

(see Chapter XV).

THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC ROADS AND RURAL ENGINEERING administers the

work of the federal government for road improvement, and studies

farm engineering problems such as those relating to sanitation and

water supply (see Chapters XVII and XX).

REGULATORY POWERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

The Department of Agriculture has certain important powers of

regulation and control. Animals are inspected at market centers to

discover the presence of disease, and localities infected are

quarantined.

In 1915 more than 15 million sheep were inspected and nearly 4

million dipped to cure scabies. As a result nearly one and one

half million square miles of land were released from quarantine.

In the same year more than a million square miles were released

from quarantine against scabies in cattle.

In quarantining a state, or portion of a state, the Department

acts by authority of laws passed by Congress under its power to

regulate interstate and foreign commerce (Constitution, Art. I,

Sec. 8, cl. 3). By the same authority, all cattle for export and

all imported from foreign countries are inspected and those

diseased excluded. Slaughter houses and meat-packing

establishments where meat is packed for interstate or foreign

commerce are inspected; meat that is unfit for use being

condemned, while that which is good has the government stamp

placed upon it. Such measures are primarily health measures (see

Chapter XX), but they have great economic value.

In a similar manner imported seeds, plants, and plant products are

inspected to prevent the importation of plant diseases and plant

pests, and also to prevent adulteration of plant products.

Warehouses are inspected and licenses granted to those that are

suitable for the proper storage of cotton, grains, tobacco,

flaxseed, and wool. The Department enforces the laws that fix the

standards for grading cotton and grain, and licenses grain

inspectors. It also enforces the Food and Drugs Act (see Chapter

XX).

Topics for investigation:

Difficulties experienced by farmers in your locality in marketing

produce or livestock.

Assistance received from the United States Department of

Agriculture to overcome the difficulties.

Experiments in cooperative marketing in your locality.

Products of your locality that require storage facilities.

Adequacy of storage facilities.

Transportation needs of your locality. Improvements in

transportation facilities in recent years.

Consult your county agent, or write to the Office of Farm

Management, for publications relating to farm management, farm

accounting, etc.

Discuss with farmers of your acquaintance the extent to which they

find farm accounts and farm records useful.

Diseases of livestock prevalent in your locality and state.

Experiments in cooperation to eradicate these diseases. Assistance

received from the Department of Agriculture.

Crops of foreign origin raised in your locality. Countries from

which introduced.

Destructive plant diseases and plant pests of your locality.

Efforts to combat them.

Importance of bird migrations to the farmers of your locality.

Extent of protection afforded birds. How you cooperate in this

matter.

Importance of these various farmers' problems to the people in

town--the housekeeper, the merchant, the manufacturer, the

railroad companies.

Cases of animal quarantine occurring in your locality.

Why warehouses for food products, cotton, etc., should be

licensed. What "licensing" means.

How grain, cotton, or other products are "graded." The reason for

grading. Why there needs to be a law on the subject.

SERVICE OF OTHER DEPARTMENTS OF GOVERNMENT

While the business interests of the farmer, and indeed many of his

other interests, such as health, education, and social life, are

especially looked after by the Department of Agriculture, he

shares with all other citizens the services of all the other

departments of government, each of which also has its elaborate

organization (see Chapter XXVII). It is the Treasury Department,

for example, acting under authority given to it by Congress, that

provides the people with their system of money and with a banking

system, both of which are great cooperative devices. The

Department of Commerce serves the farmer directly by discovering

markets for his products in every part of the world, and

indirectly by everything it does to promote the country's

commerce. The rural mail delivery, the parcel post, and the motor

truck service of the Post Office Department are of untold value to

the farmer (see Chapter XVIII). The Department of the Interior has

supervision over the public lands, the reclamation of arid lands,

and the development of mineral resources (Chapters XIV, XV).

THE QUESTION OF LABOR SUPPLY

The question of labor supply is one of the most serious questions

which the farmer has to face. It is one that he must help to solve

for himself:

As soon as work on the farms is organized, and employment is made

steady for all help, just so soon will a better class of laborers

be attracted to the farm. As the farm-owner wishes life to be free

from eternal drudgery for himself and family, yielding the fruits

of happiness, leisure, and culture, he would do well to consent

and arrange to give the farm hand who shares the shelter of his

roof a fair chance at the same benefits. The laborer wants regular

hours, a chance for recreation, a good place to live in, and

enough wages to maintain a family according to American standards.

[Footnote: W.J. Dougan and M.W. Leiserson in "Rural Social

Problems," Fourth Annual Report Wisconsin Country Life Conference,

quoted in Nourse, AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS pp. 258-260.]

But there are aspects of the labor problem over which the farmer

by his own unaided efforts can have little control. One of these

is the problem of bringing the laborer and the job together (see

Chapter XI, p. 133). The work of the Employment Service in the

Department of Labor during the recent war affords a striking

illustration of cooperation secured through an agency of

government.

THE UNITED STATES EMPLOYMENT SERVICE

The Employment Service had been created in 1914, but was rapidly

developed during the war to meet the demand for farm labor to

provide a food supply adequate to war needs. The main offices of

Employment Service were with the Department of Labor in

Washington. But each state had a federal director of employment,

and branch offices were established in local communities. The

success of the whole scheme depended, first of all, upon

cooperation between national, state, and local governments.

Thousands of county agents and local rural community organizations

discovered and reported local needs to local employment offices,

which in turn distributed the information by means of the

district, state, and national organizations. Fifty-five thousand

post offices became farm-labor employment agencies, postmasters

and rural carriers acting as agents. Railroads cooperated both in

reporting needs for the districts through which they run and in

distributing labor to the points where needed. Newspaper offices

served as employment bureaus. The operators of nearly 8000 rural

telephone companies weekly called up the homes of two million

farmers to inquire as to needs. State and county councils of

defense, chambers of commerce, labor unions, farmers'

organizations, and other volunteer agencies afforded channels

through which the farmer and the laborer were brought together.

From January to the end of October 1918, approximately 2,500,000

workers were directed to employment (not all farm workers). In

that year the enormous wheat crop of the western states was

entirely harvested by labor forces organized and moving northward

as the harvest ripened. "Teamwork between the county agricultural

agents and farm-help specialists of the Department of Agriculture

and the harvest emergency force of the United States Employment

Service is considered largely responsible for the excellent

results." In a similar manner assistance was given in harvesting

the corn and cotton crops, the fruits of orchards and vineyards,

and the vegetable crops of the country.

The Boys' Working Reserve constituted one division of the

Employment Service. In 1918, 210,000 boys between the ages of 16

and 20 were enrolled for work on the farms during the summer. The

Reserve was responsible in 1917 and 1918 for saving millions of

dollars worth of crops. It is estimated that in 1918 it raised

enough food to feed a million soldiers for one year.

EMPLOYMENT SERVICE IN PEACE TIME

With the passing of the war emergency, the elaborate machinery of

the Employment Service was in large measure allowed to fall to

pieces through lack of appropriations for its maintenance. This is

true of much of the emergency organization of government developed

during the war period. It illustrates the tendency in our country

to leave business control as fully as possible to individual

initiative excepting in times of great emergency. So important is

the problem of bringing the worker and the job together that many

believe that the Employment Service organization should be revived

and continued.

The central office at Washington is still maintained. In most

states there are still (1919) state directors. The local machinery

has been largely discontinued except in cities where volunteer

agencies, such as the Red Cross and other welfare organizations,

have taken over the work, chiefly to find employment for

discharged soldiers and sailors. A few states have made

appropriations to continue the Boys' Working Reserve.

NATIONAL VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE

One division of the Employment Service is the Junior Section, for

the guidance of boys and girls from 16 to 21 years of age seeking

employment. Local junior sections were organized as branches of

local employment offices and in schools. A "junior counselor" was

placed in charge of each local junior section to study the needs

and qualifications of those who applied for employment, and to

give them advice. The Junior Section is still maintained with a

director in the Washington office. The duties of the junior

counselor are stated as follows:

To influence boys and girls to remain in school as long as

possible.

To give aid toward the right start for those who have to leave

school to go to work.

To arouse the ambitions of the boys and girls to fit themselves

for definite careers.

To direct youth who are employed toward some form of trade,

technical, or business school for special training.

To promote the opportunities for vocational education.

To follow up all applicants in their training and at their work to

see that they have the best available advantages of study and

labor.

GOVERNMENT ALWAYS AT OUR SERVICE

The array of facts contained in the foregoing paragraphs is given,

not with the expectation that those who read will memorize them,

but to suggest the enormous amount of work that the United States

government is doing in the interest of agriculture and the farmer,

and the extensive machinery necessary to do it. The facts given

are only a few of those that might be given. The detailed story of

how much of this work is done is fascinating, and often of

thrilling interest. All around us may be seen, if our eyes are

open, the evidences of the work of our government. Always the

governmental machinery is at hand to serve us in a thousand ways,

if we are wise enough to use it. The more we study its work, the

more we shall be impressed by the fact that its greatest service

is in opening the way for cooperation, and in providing the

organization and the leadership for such cooperation.

Topics for investigation:

How money serves as a means of cooperation.

How a bank serves as a means of cooperation.

The attractiveness of the conditions of living for farm laborers

in your community. How they could be improved.

The farm labor supply in your locality and state.

The work of the United States Employment Service in your state and

community.

Employment agencies in your community at the present time. By whom

conducted. Are they free, or run for profit? Advantages and

disadvantages of the two kinds.

Harvesting the wheat crop in war time.

The Boys' Working Reserve in your locality. The experience of the

farmers of your locality as to its value. Possible objections

raised to it. Its continuance since the war.

The Junior Section of the Employment Service.

Junior counselors in your community.

READINGS

Procure from the State Department of Agriculture, the State

Agricultural College, and the State Experiment Station,

publications relating to their work.

Send to the U. S. Department of Agriculture for its List of

Publications Available for Distribution; or for publications

relating to particular topics. Among the useful publications of

the Department are:

Farmers' Bulletins (covering a wide variety of subjects).

States Relations Service Circulars.

The Year Book.

Annual Reports of the Secretary of Agriculture.

Program of Work of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (1917 or

later years).

Report on Agricultural Experiment Stations and Cooperative

Agricultural Extension Work (1915 or later years).

A very useful publication is the "Guide to United States

Government Publications," published by the U.S. Bureau of

Education as Bulletin, 1918, No. 2. It not only describes the

publications of each department of government, but also the

organization and work of each department and its subdivisions.

(Government Printing Office, 20 cents.)

More recent and equally useful is "The Federal Executive

Departments as Sources of Information for Libraries," also

published by the Bureau of Education, Bulletin, 1919, No. 74

(Government Printing Office, 25 cents). The work of each

Department and its subdivisions is described in some detail.

In Lessons in Community and National Life:

Series B: Lesson 30, Employment agencies.

Series C: Lesson 12, Patents and inventions.

Lesson 13, Market reports on fruits and vegetables.

CHAPTER XIII

THRIFT

"THRIFT IS GOOD MANAGEMENT OF THE BUSINESS OF LIVING."

NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF THRIFT

This definition is taken from "Ten Lessons in Thrift," issued by

the Treasury Department of the United States Government (February,

1919). The United States Government sent out these lessons because

"America to-day stands in the position in which all her economic

problems must be solved through thrift ... Unless our people gain

a deep, sincere appreciation of the absolute necessity for thrift,

we cannot hope to hold the proud position we occupy as the flag

bearer of nations ..." [Footnote: S.W. Strauss, President American

Society for Thrift, in "The Patriotism of War Savings" (National

Education Association pamphlet, THRIFT, 1918)]

LESSONS OF THE WAR

The great war taught us some lessons about the importance of

thrift to the nation. The enormous expenses of the war were paid

and the armies and the civilian populations of the countries at

war were fed very largely by the combined small savings of our

people. Nearly 20 million people contributed to the fourth liberty

loan, by which almost seven billion dollars were raised, an

average of about $350 for each contributor. Almost every one

bought war savings stamps, by which about a billion dollars were

raised in 1918. Practically all this money came from savings.

Enormous sums were also given to the Red Cross and other causes.

To do this people saved and sacrificed "until it hurt." The

provisioning of our armies and of the needy peoples of Europe was

made possible by the saving, in American homes, of slices of

bread, of teaspoonfuls of sugar, of small portions of meat and

fats.

THRIFT AS PATRIOTISM

Thrift, however, is not merely a war necessity. "The time when

thrift shall not be needed--needed as vitally as food itself--will

never come ... Through thrift alone can the rebuilding come--the

rebuilding of America--the rebuilding of the world ... Thrift is

patriot ism because it is the elimination of every element that

tends to retard..." [Footnote: S W Strauss, "The Patriotism of War

Savings"]

Thrift is necessary both for individual success and for good

citizenship. It is only by thrift that the individual may in some

measure repay others for the care he himself received during

dependent childhood, and provide, during his productive years, for

the "rainy day" of sickness and old age. It is by thrift that

CAPITAL is accumulated with which to carry on the world's work.

The citizen who saves and invests his savings in a home, in

business enterprises, in bonds or savings stamps, not only makes

his own future secure, but becomes identified with the community

and takes a greater interest in it. The thrifty citizen inspires

the confidence of the community, and acquires an influence in

community affairs that the unthrifty citizen does not enjoy.

Finnish farmers in a certain section of New England are said to be

able to obtain credit from neighboring bankers and businessmen

more easily than many of their neighbors, and to be considered as

especially desirable citizens, because of their reputation for

thrift and honesty. Thrift is often confused with stinginess and

selfish ness. On the contrary it alone makes generosity and

service possible.

THRIFT, "THE ESSENCE OF DEMOCRACY"

"Thrift is the very essence of democracy." For democracy means

freedom, equality of opportunity, "self-determination." No man is

a greater slave than one who is bound and driven by financial

necessity. By thrift the mind is "unfettered by the petty

annoyances that result from improvident ways." Thrift means

providing for the future. There is nothing in the world that will

so establish one's faith in the future and that will, therefore,

give that freedom of spirit upon which democracy depends, as the

wise use of to-day and of to-day's resources.

THRIFT A RIGHT AS WELL AS A DUTY

"Every man must practice thrift and every man must have the CHANCE

of practicing it." It is a RIGHT as well as a duty. Before the war

it was said that four fifths of the wage earners of our country

received less than $750 a year for their labor. Studies in various

cities also showed that an average family of five could not

maintain health and efficiency on an income of less than from $750

to $1000. Under such circumstances thrift is the strictest

necessity, but it is a thrift that means pinching economy and the

sacrifice of health and efficiency. It is not the thrift that

provides for the future and gives freedom to the individual, the

thrift that is "the essence of democracy itself." Every man should

have an opportunity to earn a "living wage," which includes an

opportunity to provide for the future. Democracy is not complete

until that opportunity is afforded.

Thrift, or the good management of the business of living, is shown

(1) in earning, (2) in spending, (3) in saving, and (4) in

investing.

THRIFT IN EARNING

(1) Since the earning of a living was the subject of Chapter XI,

we need not dwell upon it now except to note that a thrifty person

is an industrious person--he makes wise use of his time; and also

to note that many of those who are now in want, or who, in

advanced years, are receiving small wages, owe their condition to

a failure at some time or other to make use of the opportunity for

thrift. Many people do not recognize the opportunity when it is

presented, or lack the wisdom or the courage to seize it. Thrift

involves MAKING A CHOICE, and in many cases a wise choice requires

courage as well as wisdom. It is a choice between the satisfaction

of present wants and the sacrifice of present enjoyment for the

sake of greater satisfaction and service in the future.

When a boy in school has a chance to take a job that will pay him

wages, he has to make a choice between it and remaining in school.

It may seem to be the thrifty thing to go to work; but real thrift

is shown by careful choice of vocation, and by thorough

preparation for it, even though it requires sacrifices that seem

difficult (see pp. 137, 139).

We may note here, also, that physical fitness is essential if

earning power, which means power to perform service, is to be

fully developed. The "conservation" of health and life is so

important that a chapter is devoted to it later (Chapter XX).

THRIFT IN SPENDING

(2) After money has been earned, thrift shows itself first of all

in the way the money is spent; and many of us have the spending of

the money that some one else has earned. Every time we spend a

nickel or a dollar we make a choice--we choose to spend or not to

spend, how much we shall spend, for what we shall spend.

A lawyer in a small town reports that in one month he made out the

necessary papers to enable 75 men to mortgage their homes to buy

automobiles.

Butchers say that during the war they more often sold expensive

cuts of meat to wage earners who were by no means well-to-do, but

who happened for the time to be getting good wages, than to people

of larger means. One reason, perhaps, for extravagance in food and

clothing on the part of unintelligent people who find themselves

unusually prosperous, is that they see no better way to spend

their money. Those who find pleasure in books, in education for

their children, in travel, in investing money in serviceable

enterprises, and in the higher things of life, have to make A

CHOICE in regard to what they shall enjoy, and as a rule prefer to

sacrifice the grosser pleasures.

CHOOSING WHAT TO SPEND

People, and especially young people, need a certain amount of

sweets in their diet. But when we know that the candy bill of the

people of the United States amounts to $400,000,000 a year, that

this is almost as much as the total amount spent for public

education, that it is about double the amount used to keep Belgium

supplied with food for a year during the war, or that it will buy

234 million bushels of corn at $1.70 a bushel, we may well think

twice before deciding to spend MUCH money for candy.

TESTS FOR SPENDING

The few cents difference in the price of two articles between

which we must choose, and the nickels we spend for immediate

enjoyment, may seem to amount to very little; but the New York

City street railways collected in a year $95,000,000 in five-cent

fares, and the Woolworth Building in New York, one of the largest

office buildings in the United States, was built from the profits

of "5 and 10 Cent Stores." One thrift stamp a week amounts in five

years to $65, and 14 cents a day at 4 per cent interest amounts in

twenty years to more than $1500. In one of the "Ten Lesson in

Thrift," the following "tests in buying" are given:

Do I need it?

Do I need it now?

Do I need something else more?

Will it pay for itself in the end?

Do I help or injure the community in buying this?

Do you have instruction in your school in home economics that

relates to wise spending or buying?

If you do not have such instruction, apply to the home

demonstration agent in your county (if there is one), or write to

your state agricultural college, or to the States Relations

Service, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., for

circulars or bulletins relating to thrift in buying food,

clothing, etc.

In writing for such material, why is it an example of thrift to

ask for ONE copy of EACH publication for your CLASS or for your

SCHOOL, rather than to ask for a copy for each pupil?

In what ways is thrift shown by having a class committee write one

letter making the request for the class instead of having each

member of the class write?

Has any home demonstration work relating to thrift been conducted

in your community? What methods were employed, and what results

achieved?

Who in your family makes most of the expenditures for the family

living?

For what items in the family living is most of the money spent?

What are some of the things that have to be considered in buying

food? clothing? house furnishings? books? amusements?

Discuss the topics mentioned in the following statement of "values

in buying" (from "Ten Lessons in Thrift"):

Food: nutrition, healthfulness, cleanliness, attractiveness,

flavor, quality, price, economy in preparation (of time, strength,

fuel, utensils), buying from bulk or in package, buying in

quantity or small unit, buying for the day or laying in stores,

calculation of portions, calculation of meals, varied diet.

Clothing: design related to material, color, and becomingness;

style, durability; adaptability to fine or rough wear, to repair

and remaking; suitability to season, health, occupation, comfort;

home-made VERSUS ready-made; conditions of manufacture, use of

child labor, the sweat shop, the living wage, health.

Make a study at the grocery of the relative prices of articles

bought in small and large quantities: for example, laundry soap by

the bar, by the quarter's worth, by the box; canned goods by the

can, by the dozen, and by the case; flour by the pound, by the 25-

pound sack, 50-pound sack, by the barrel; etc.

Make a study of the relative prices of articles in bulk and in

package; for example, vinegar by the bottle and by the gallon;

bacon in bulk and in jars, etc.

Why may it be economy to buy some food articles in packages rather

than in bulk, even at a higher price? Give examples.

Which is likely to be more economical, to buy groceries by

telephone or in person? To buy by mail order or at the store in

town? Why?

At Christmas time the Park View community center in Washington,

D.C., ordered 140 turkeys from a rural neighborhood center in

Maryland. The turkeys were brought by the producers to the

schoolhouse of the rural neighborhood, taken by a postal service

motor-truck to the schoolhouse of the Park View center in

Washington, and from there distributed to the 140 families. The

city buyers paid an average of 15 cents a pound less than the

price prevailing in the Washington markets, and the producers

received 6 cents a pound more than the Washington markets were

paying.

Why was there a saving to both producer and consumer in the above

case? What costs of marketing were cut out or reduced?

What is the "middleman"? Does he perform a real service to the

community? Should he be paid for his service? Why? Is it just that

the middleman should be "eliminated" by cooperative marketing and

buying organizations? Why?

Is there any cooperative buying organization in your community? If

so, how has it benefited the community? If not, why? (Consult your

parents, your county agent, and others.)

Get publications from your state agricultural college relating to

cooperative buying and selling.

THRIFT IN MANAGEMENT

Wise expenditures depend not only upon knowledge of prices and

qualities, but also upon good management, as in planning ahead.

One plan that has been the means of lifting many individuals and

families out of financial difficulties and of enabling them to lay

by as savings a portion of their income, however small the latter

may be, is the BUDGET, which means the apportionment of

expenditures according to a plan laid out in advance. No budget

can apply to all families alike, but the following illustrates the

principle:

House (rent, taxes, insurance, repairs)........................25%

Food (all expenditures for the table, ice, etc.)...............30%

Clothing (materials and making, repairing, cleaning, pressing,

millinery, shoes)..............................................13%

Housekeeping (labor and materials for laundry, fuel and light,

telephone, supplies, and furnishings)..........................12%

Educational (school and school books, club dues, church and charity

contributions, gifts, books, magazines, newspapers, amusements,

medical and dental treatment)...................................6%

Luxuries (all items not necessaries and not coming under

"educational," such as candies, etc.)...........................4%

Savings........................................................10%

Total.........................................................100%

Before a budget can be planned, and in order to know whether it is

being lived up to, it is necessary to keep accounts of receipts

and expenditures. With such accounts, it is possible to determine

where savings can be made under some heads and where, perhaps, it

is necessary or advisable to spend more.

Is a budget used in your home? Find out from your parents their

reason for using, or not using it.

Could you use a budget in your own personal affairs?

Find out whether a budget system is used by your local government

and your state government in apportioning expenditures.

How may we "budget" our time? Is the time you spend in school

"budgeted"? Make a daily time budget for yourself.

When is clothing a necessity and when a luxury? [Footnote: This

and the following topics are adapted from "Ten Lessons in

Thrift."]

When is food a necessity and when an amusement?

When is amusement education and when a frivolity?

When is fuel an item in rent and when current housekeeping

expense?

When are club dues education and when amusement?

When is vacation health and when amusement?

When is the theater amusement and when indulgence?

When is rent a necessity and when an extravagance?

[Footnote: From "Suggestion for Home Demonstration Agents

regarding Methods of Teaching Thrift," States Relations Service

Circular, Dec. 27, 1918.]

THRIFT IN SAVING

(3) The object of thrift in spending is both to get the greatest

value for our money now and to insure savings that will provide

for the future. Every budget should make as definite provision for

savings as for rent or clothing. The purpose of a budget and of

accounts is to assure a surplus rather than a deficit. Successful

men and women make it a practice always to spend less than they

earn, no matter how little they earn, and they cannot be sure of

this without planning ahead and keeping accounts. Saving in this

way is largely a matter of habit; but it is astonishing how many

fail to form the habit. Court records show that out of every 100

men who die, 82 leave no income-producing estates, or that about

85 per cent who reach the age of 65 are dependent upon relatives

or upon the community. "Out of every 100 widows, only 18 are left

in comfortable circumstances, while 47 are obliged to go to work

and 35 are left in absolute want." [Footnote: S.W. Strauss, "The

Greater Thrift," National Education Association PROCEEDINGS, 1916,

p. 278.]

AMERICAN EXTRAVAGANCE

Wise buying means saving money; and so does the wise use of what

we buy. It is said that an American ship can be distinguished from

the ships of other nations in harbor by the flocks of gulls that

hover around to feast on the food thrown overboard. Whether this

is true or not, Americans have a reputation for wastefulness. It

has been called our chief national sin. It is said that a family

in France can live in comfort on what an American family in the

same circumstances ordinarily throws away. An average load of

garbage in New York City has been shown to contain fifty dollars'

worth of good food materials.

WHAT SMALL SAVINGS WILL DO

Investigations by the Food Administration showed that there is

enough glycerine in a ton of garbage to make explosives for 14

shells, enough fat and acid to make 75 bars of soap, and enough

fertilizer to grow 8 bushels of wheat. It is said that 24 cities

wasted enough garbage to make 4 million pounds of nitroglycerine,

40 million cakes of soap, and fertilizer for 3 million bushels of

wheat. On the other hand, 300 cities produced 52 million pounds of

pork by feeding their garbage to hogs.

The Department of Agriculture has shown that the waste of a half-

cup of milk daily by each of the 20 million families in the United

States would equal in a year the total production of 400 thousand

cows; that one ounce of meat or fat saved daily would in a year

mean 875 thousand steers, or a million hogs; and that if 81

percent of the whole wheat were used in bread instead of 75

percent, the saving in a year would feed 12 million people. During

the war our government organized a campaign for the salvage of

"junk," and the total amount collected had a value of 1 1/2

billion dollars. The school children of Des Moines, Iowa, are

reported to have gathered and sold two thousand dollars' worth of

waste paper in one week, and those of many other communities

obtained similar results.

VALUE OF BY-PRODUCTS

Every successful business man is constantly vigilant to discover

and remedy waste in his business--waste of materials, time, and

effort. Many of the most valuable products in certain industries

are "by-products,"--that is, products produced as an incident to

the main industry and from materials that otherwise would have

been wasted. In the manufacture of gas from coal, for example,

important by-products are coke, tar, and ammonia. There has been

great waste in the lumber industry, but now practically every

scrap from the tree may be used. In the Forestry Products

Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin, a process has been

discovered of producing from 15 to 25 gallons of wood alcohol from

a ton of sawdust--and sawdust has many other uses. These are only

illustrations. Scientists and inventors, many of them employed by

the government, are constantly at work finding uses for waste

products.

WASTEFULNESS IN FARMING

Wastefulness is found in great variety in farming activities. For

example:

Why plant seed only 60 or 70 per cent of which will germinate

when, for a few dollars extra and a little work, seed may be

procured that will average 90 to 95 per cent in the germination

test? Why purchase or cultivate a worthless crab apple tree or a

hybrid when Rome Beauty, Northern Spy, or Grimes Golden, and other

standard varieties of apples may be secured for a few additional

cents? Why feed and care for a "scrub" pig, calf, or colt when it

will bring at maturity only half or two thirds the price of a

thoroughbred? ... It is not thrift to invest money in second-rate

products.

Some farmers are so careless ... that they do not husk their corn

in the fall but leave it standing in the field until late winter

or early spring. By this time the fodder is somewhat decayed and

unfit for feeding purposes. Possibly a third of the corn has been

eaten by the birds, a third of it has rotted, and a third of it

remains in a damp and moldy condition. ... Many boys could make

good wages by going over the corn field at cutting time and

collecting the ears lying on the ground. ... Often a farmer will

cut down his hay, paying no attention whatever to the reports of

the weather bureau ... Apples shaken from the trees by the wind

decay on the ground ...

Community Civics and Rural Life · 第 11 / 16 章