CHAPTER I.

_FABLES AND FABULISTS._

[Device]

[Illustration: MERCURY BESTOWING ON THE YOUTHFUL ÆSOP THE INVENTION OF

THE APOLOGUE. (_See page 43._)]

FABLES AND FABULISTS:

_ANCIENT AND MODERN_.

BY

THOMAS NEWBIGGING,

_Author of

'The History of the Forest of Rossendale,' 'Old Gamul,' etc._

_CHEAP EDITION._

LONDON:

ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C.

1896.

[_All rights reserved._]

'I shall tell you

A pretty tale: it may be you have heard it;

But, since it serves my purpose, I will venture

To stale't a little more.'

SHAKESPEARE: _Coriolanus_.

'He sat among the woods; he heard

The sylvan merriment; he saw

The pranks of butterfly and bird,

The humours of the ape, the daw.

'And in the lion or the frog--

In all the life of moor and fen,

In ass and peacock, stork and log,

He read similitudes of men.'

ANDREW LANG.

'The fables which appeal to our higher moral sympathies may

sometimes do as much for us as the truths of science.'

MRS. JAMESON.

'The years of infancy constitute, in the memory of each of us, the

fabulous season of existence; just as in the memory of nations,

the fabulous period was the period of their infancy.'--GIACOMO

LEOPARDI.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER PAGE

I. DEFINITION OF FABLE 1

II. CHARACTERISTICS OF FABLES 7

III. THE MORAL AND APPLICATION OF FABLES 13

IV. FABULISTS AS CENSORS 19

V. LESSONS TAUGHT BY FABLES 25

VI. ÆSOP 33

VII. STORIES RELATED OF ÆSOP 42

VIII. THE ÆSOPIAN FABLES 52

IX. PHÆDRUS AND BABRIUS 63

X. THE FABLE IN HISTORY AND MYTH 68

XI. HINDOO, ARABIAN, AND PERSIAN FABLES.--PILPAY,

LOCMAN.--'THE GESTA ROMANORUM' 80

XII. MODERN FABULISTS: LA FONTAINE, GAY 96

XIII. MODERN FABULISTS: DODSLEY, NORTHCOTE 108

XIV. MODERN FABULISTS: LESSING, YRIARTE, KRILOF 115

XV. OTHER AND OCCASIONAL FABULISTS 125

XVI. CONCLUSION 143

INDEX 147

_FABLES AND FABULISTS_

CHAPTER I.

DEFINITION OF FABLE.

'Read my little fable,

He that runs may read.'

TENNYSON: _The Flower_.

'As clear as a whistle.'

BYRON: _The Astrologer_.

The term 'fable' is used in two senses, with two distinctive meanings.

First, as _fabulæ_, it is employed to denote the myths or fictions

which, by the aid of imagination and superstition, have clouded, or

have become blended with, the history of the remote past. Such are the

stories related of Scandinavian and Grecian heroes and gods; beings,

some of whom doubtless had an actual human existence, and were wise and

valiant and powerful, or the reverse, in their day, but around whose

names and persons have clustered all the marvellous legends that are to

be found in mythological lore. The better name for these is 'romance.'

Secondly, as _fabellæ_, it is used to signify a special branch of

literature, in which the imagination has full play, altogether

unassisted by superstition in any shape or form. The fabulist

confers the powers or gifts of reason and speech on the humbler

subjects over whom he exercises sway, and so has ample scope for his

imaginative faculty; but there is no attempt on his part at any serious

make-believe in his inventions. On the contrary, there is a tacit

understanding between him and his hearers and readers, that what he

narrates is only true in the sense of its application to corresponding

circumstances in human life and conduct.

It is with fable as understood in this latter sense that we propose to

deal.

The Fable or Apologue has been variously defined by different writers.

Mr. Walter Pater, paraphrasing Plato's definition, says that 'fables

are medicinable lies or fictions, with a provisional or economized

truth in them, set forth under such terms as simple souls can best

receive.'[1] The sophist Aphthonius, taking the same view, defines the

fable as 'a false discourse resembling truth.'[2] The harshness of both

these definitions is scarcely relieved by their quaintness. To assert

that the fable is a lie or a falsehood does not fairly represent the

fact. A lie is spoken with intent to deceive. A fable, in its relation,

can bear no such construction, however exaggerated in its terms or

fictitious in its characters. The meanest comprehension is capable of

grasping the humour of the situation it creates. Even the moral that

lurks in the narration is often clear to minds the most obtuse. This is

at least true of the best fables.

Dr. Johnson, in his 'Life of Gay,' remarks that 'A fable or epilogue

seems to be, in its genuine state, a narrative in which beings

irrational, and sometimes inanimate--_quod arbores loquantur, non

tantum feræ_[3]--are, for the purpose of moral instruction, feigned to

act and speak with human interests and passions.'

Dodsley says that ''tis the very essence of a fable to convey some

moral or useful truth beneath the shadow of an allegory.'[4] Boothby

defines the fable as 'a maxim for the use of common life, exemplified

in a short action, in which the inhabitants of the visible world are

made the moral agents.' G. Moir Bussey states that 'the object of the

author is to convey some moral truth to the reader or auditor, without

usurping the province of the professed lecturer or pedant. The lesson

must therefore be conveyed in an agreeable form, and so that the

moralist himself may be as little prominent as possible.'[5] Mr. Joseph

Jacobs says that 'the beast fable may be defined as a short humorous

allegorical tale, in which animals act in such a way as to illustrate a

simple moral truth or inculcate a wise maxim.'[6]

These various definitions or descriptions apply more especially to the

Æsopian fable (and it is with this that we are dealing at present),

which is _par excellence_ the model of this class of composition.

Steele declares that 'the virtue which we gather from a fable or an

allegory is like the health we get by hunting, as we are engaged in

an agreeable pursuit that draws us on with pleasure, and makes us

insensible of the fatigues that accompany it.'[7] This is applied to

the longer fable or epic, such as the 'Iliad' and 'Odyssey' of Homer,

or the 'Faerie Queen' of Spenser, rather than to the fable as the term

is generally understood, otherwise the simile is somewhat inflated.

One more definition may be attempted:

The Æsopian fable or apologue is a short story, either fictitious or

true, generally fictitious, calculated to convey instruction, advice or

reproof, in an interesting form, impressing its lesson on the mind more

deeply than a mere didactic piece of counsel or admonition is capable

of doing. We say a short story, because if the narration is spun out

to a considerable length it ceases to be a true fable in the ordinary

acceptation of the term, and becomes a tale, such, for example, as a

fairy tale. Now, a fairy or other fanciful tale usually or invariably

contains some romance and much improbability; it often deals largely in

the superstitious, and it is not necessarily the vehicle for conveying

a moral. The very opposite holds good of a fable. Although animals

are usually the actors in the fable, there is an air of naturalness

in their assumed speech and actions. The story may be either highly

imaginative or baldly matter-of-fact, but it never wanders beyond the

range of intuitive (as opposed to actual or natural) experience, and

it always contains a moral. In a word, a fable is, or ought to be, the

very quintessence of common sense and wise counsel couched in brief

narrative form. It partakes somewhat of the character of a parable,

though it can hardly be described as a parable, because this is more

sedate in character, has human beings as its actors, and is usually

based on an actual occurrence.

Though parables are not fables in the strict and limited meaning of the

term, they bear a close family relationship to them. Parables may be

defined as stories in allegorical dress. The Scriptures, both old and

new, abound with them. The most beautiful example in the Old Testament

is that of Nathan and the ewe lamb,[8] in which David the King is made

his own accuser. This was a favourite mode of conveying instruction and

reproof employed by our Lord. Christ often 'spake in parables'; and

with what feelings of reverential awe must we regard the parables of

the Gospels, coming as they did from the lips of our Saviour!

FOOTNOTES:

[1] 'Plato and Platonism,' by Walter Pater. London: Macmillan and Co.,

1893, p. 225.

[2] Aphthonius flourished at Antioch, at what time is uncertain. Forty

of his Æsopian fables, with a Latin version by Kimedoncius, were

printed from a MS. in the Palatine Library at the beginning of the

seventeenth century. 'The Æsopian Fable,' by Sir Brooke Boothby, Bart.

Edinburgh: Constable and Co., 1809. Preface, p. xxxi.

[3] 'Even trees speak, not only wild beasts.'--Phædrus, Book i.,

Prologue.

[4] 'Essay on Fable.'

[5] 'Fables Original and Selected,' by G. Moir Bussey. London:

Willoughby and Co., 1842.

[6] 'The Fables of Æsop,' as first printed by William Caxton in 1484.

London: David Nutt, 1889, vol. i., p. 204.

[7] 'The Tatler,' No. 147, vol. iii., p. 205.

[8] 2 Samuel xii. 1-7.

Fables and Fabulists: Ancient and Modern · 第 1 / 16 章