Moreover, it soon became evident that the Dissenters themselves did

not desire Comprehension. Their ministers were petted and made much of

by the well-to-do yeomen and the rich merchants in country and town.

They lived on the fat of the land, snapped up wealthy widows and

bought broad acres. Whereas the needy country parson was hard pressed

to wring the tithes from his parishioners. While the walls of

exclusion of Jericho stood, the rams' horns brayed against them daily,

and seven times on the Sabbath; but so soon as the walls were

prostrate, and every man could go up into the city and take up his

quarters there where he liked, the rams' horns would have to be laid

aside as superfluous lumber.

The King was disappointed and offended. What he did was to prorogue

Convocation for six weeks, and when those six weeks had expired, to

prorogue it again, and many years elapsed before it was again suffered

to assemble.

That Convocation of 1689 saved the Church of England from dissolution

into a formless, gelatinous, and invertebrate mass.

Burnet himself, though disappointed at the time, felt afterwards that

the determination of the Lower House had saved the Church at a time of

crisis. "There was," he says, "a very happy direction of the

providence of God observed in this matter. The Jacobite clergy who

were then under suspension were designing to make a schism in the

Church, whensoever they should be turned out and their places should

be filled up by others. They saw it would not be easy to make a

separation upon a private and personal account; they therefore wished

to be furnished with more specious pretences, and if we had made

alterations in the Rubrics and other parts of the Common Prayer, they

would have pretended that they still stuck to the ancient Church of

England, in opposition to those who were altering it and setting up

new models. And, as I do firmly believe that there is a wise

providence that watches upon human affairs, and directs them--so I

have observed this in many instances relating to the Revolution ... by

all the judgments we could afterwards make, if we had carried a

majority in the Convocation for alterations, they would have done us

more hurt than good."

Burnet was morally and intellectually incapable of seeing that it was

a case of conscience, of _stantis vel cadentis ecclesiæ_, and he

attributed the motives of the recalcitrant clergy to political

prejudice.

On Jane's return to Oxford, he found another opportunity of defending

the Church, by framing the decree of 1690, which condemned the "Naked

Gospel" of Arthur Burge.

Jane had no hopes whatever of preferment from William, if he cared for

it. In 1696 it was even rumoured that the King meditated turning him

out of his professorship, because he had not signed the "Association

for King William." But on Anne's accession, all his fears were at an

end. It would appear from a letter of Atterbury that at Oxford the

University desired to get rid of him, because he neglected giving

lectures on Divinity, and left the work to be discharged by a

subordinate named Smallridge.

In 1703 Bishop Trelawny appointed him to the Chancellorship of Exeter

Cathedral, which he exchanged for the precentorship in 1704, but he

retained his Regius professorship to the end. Undoubtedly it was a

great pleasure to him in the decline of his life to be back in the

West Country.

He resigned the precentorship of Exeter in 1706, and died on the 23rd

February, 1707, at Oxford, and was buried in Christ Church.

The writer of his life in the _Dictionary of National Biography_ sums

up his career with these words: "Jane was a clerical politician of a

low type; Calamy says of him, 'Though fond of the rites and ceremonies

of the Church, he was a Calvinist in the respect of doctrine,' and the

pleasantest thing recorded of him is his kindness shown at Oxford to

the ejected Presbyterian, Thomas Gilbert."

Calamy, as a Dissenter, was prejudiced against Jane; and I do not see

that he was of a low type of polemical cleric--because when he saw

that the theory of government he had embraced would not bear the test

of experience, he had the courage to reject it. Every man is liable to

make mistakes; it is only the brave man who can acknowledge that he

has been mistaken.

Nor was Jane alone. Compton, Bishop of London, and several other

bishops, had appealed to William of Orange to come over and help the

people and the Church of England to be free from a tyrannous and

subversive despotism. The Earl of Danby, under whose administration, and

with his sanction, a law had been proposed, which, if it had passed,

would have excluded from Parliament and office all who refused to

declare on oath that they thought resistance to the King in every case

unlawful--he had seen the mistake as well, and had invited William over.

As Macaulay says: "This theory (of passive obedience) at first

presented itself to the Cavalier as the very opposite of slavish. Its

tendency was to make him not a slave, but a free man and a master. It

exalted him by exalting one whom he regarded as his protector, as his

friend, as the head of his beloved party, and of his more beloved

Church. When Republicans were dominant the Royalist had endured wrongs

and insults which the restoration of the legitimate government had

enabled him to retaliate. Rebellion was therefore associated in his

imagination with subjection and degradation, and monarchical authority

with liberty and ascendancy. It had never crossed his imagination that

a time might come when a King, a Stuart, could prosecute the most

loyal of the clergy and gentry with more than the animosity of the

Rump or the Protector. That time had however arrived. Oppression

speedily did what philosophy and eloquence would have failed to do.

The system of Filmer might have survived the attacks of Locke; but it

never recovered from the death-blow given by James."

Jane changed his opinion indeed, but so did nearly the whole of the

Tory party and of the clergy of the Church.

THE PENNINGTONS

About seven years ago I attended the baptism of some bells for a new

church at Châteaulin, in Brittany. The ceremony was quaint, archaic,

and grotesque. The bells were suspended in the chancel "all of a row,"

dressed in white frocks with pink sashes round their waists. To each

was given god-parents who had to answer for them, and each was

actually baptized, after which each was made to speak for itself. The

ceremony evidently dates from a period when the bell was regarded as

anything but an inanimate object--it had its responsibilities, it did

its duties, it spoke in sonorous tones. The very inscriptions on them

to the present day prescribe something of this character--invest each

bell with a personality, as these:--

I sweetly tolling men do call

To taste of meats to feed the soul.

Also:--

I sound to bid the sick repent,

In hope of life when breath is spent.

As late as last century we find these:--

Both day and night I measure time for all,

To mirth and grief, to church I call.

And this in 1864:--

I toll the funeral knell,

I ring the festal day,

I mark the fleeting hours,

And chime the church to pray.

In the Western Counties bell-ringing was a favourite and delightful

pastime. Parties of ringers went about from parish to parish and rang

on the church bells, very generally for a prize--"a hat laced with

gold." At Launcells, where the bells are of superior sweetness, the

ringers who rang for the accession of George III rang for that of

George IV, there not having been a gap caused by death among them in

sixty years. No songs are so popular and well remembered at

bell-ringers' feasts as those that record the achievements of some who

went before them in the same office. I give one that has never before

been printed, that can be traced back to 1810, but is certainly older.

It relates to the ringers of Egloshayle.

1. Come all you ringers good and grave,

Come listen to my peal,

I'll tell you of five ringers brave

That lived in Egloshayle.

They bear the sway in ring array,

Where'er they chance to go;

Good music of melodious bells,

'Tis their delight to show.

2. The foreman gives the sigan-al,

He steps long with the toe,

He casts his eyes about them all,

And gives the sign to go.

Away they pull, with courage full,

The heart it do revive,

To hear them swing, and music ring,

One, two, three, four, and five.

3. There's Craddock the cordwainer first,

That rings the treble bell;

The second is John Ellery,

And none may him excel;

The third is Pollard, carpenter;

The fourth is Thomas Cleave;

Goodfellow is the tenor man,

That rings them round so brave.

4. They went up to Lanlivery,

They brought away the prize;

And then they went to San-Tudy,

And there they did likewise.

There's Stratton men, S. Mabyn men,

S. Issey and S. Kew,

But we five lads of Egloshayle

Can all the rest outdo.

5. Now, to conclude my merry task,

I' th' Sovereign's health we join;

Stand every man and pass the flask,

And drink his health in wine.

And here's to Craddock, Ellery,

And here's to Thomas Cleave,

To Pollard and the tenor man

That rings them round so brave.

Humphry Craddock died in 1839; John Ellery in 1845, aged 85 years;

John Pollard in 1825, aged 71; Thomas Cleave in 1821, aged 78; John

Goodfellow in 1846, aged 80.

But for bell-ringers there must be bells; and who cast those that have

been in past years and are still pealed so merrily? A great many were

cast by the Penningtons of Lezant, and latterly at Stoke Climsland.

The Penningtons were an ancient family in Bodmin, resident there in

the reign of Queen Elizabeth. Perhaps because not being landed gentry,

perhaps because they could not establish the right, they did not

record their arms or give their pedigree in the Heralds' Visitations.

But the coat they bore or assumed was a goodly one and simple, and

therefore ancient--_or_, in fesse five lozenges _azure_. Robert

Pennington, of Bodmin, had two sons--John, baptized in 1595, and

Bernard two years later. John married at Bodmin, and had seven sons

baptized there, one of whom was probably the progenitor of the

Penningtons of Lezant and Stoke Climsland. The pedigree of the Exeter

bell-founders of the family has not been made out; but that they

belonged to the stock that sprang up at Bodmin cannot be doubted.

Bernard Pennington, baptized in 1605, was Mayor of Bodmin in 1666, and

was a bell-founder. He died in 1674. His son Christopher Pennington,

baptized 1631, was also a bell-founder. He died in 1696. Christopher's

son of the same name was Mayor of Bodmin in 1726, 1727, and 1733. He

died in 1749. The Penningtons seem to have abandoned the bell-casting

business at the beginning of the nineteenth century; but, as Sir

William Maclean says, "between 1702 and 1818 these popular founders

cast nearly five hundred bells in the county of Devon, and, it is

believed, as many in Cornwall."[14]

There are sixty-six in Devon cast by John Pennington, of Exeter. The

earliest that is dated is at Payhembury, 1635, and the latest 1690 at

Kentisbeare. In 1669 T. P. and I. P. appear together on a bell at

Merton, as if they were partners; and ninety-five bear the trade-mark of

Thomas and John Pennington--large Roman initials with a bell in outline

between. The earliest is found at Eggesford, 1618. Sometimes they

impressed the coin then current. At Ottery S. Mary, 1671, and at S.

Martin's, Exeter, 1675, they used a satirical medal representing a pope

and a king under one face, another representing a cardinal and a bishop.

Besides two generations of Penningtons in Exeter, there was, as

already stated, Christopher Pennington, who cast a bell at Stowford

dated 1710, and one at Philleigh, in Roseland, with C. P. and the

skeleton of a bell between, as did the other Pennington. But his

earliest known is at Fremington, 1702. He was succeeded by FitzAnthony

Pennington, of Lezant, who in 1768, whilst crossing the Tamar in the

Antony ferry with a bell he had cast to be set up at Landulph, was

drowned. He is buried in the tower of Landulph, and on a mural tablet,

beside his age, which was thirty-eight, and the date of his death,

April 30th, 1768, are these lines:--

Tho' boisterous winds and billows sore

Hath toss'd me to and fro,

By God's decree, in spite of both,

I rest now here below.

After his death we have the initials of the three brothers, John,

Christopher, and William. From their head-quarters, first at Lezant

and then at Stoke Climsland, they itinerated through Cornwall and

Devon, casting bells wherever they could find deep clay, and

sufficient bell-metal was provided by the parish that desired to have

a bell in its tower, and generally the bell was cast near the church

for which it was intended.[15]

There are as many as 480 bells by this Cornish family from 1710-1818;

their latest are at Bridgerule and Bovey Tracey, at this last date.

William Pennington, son of the second Christopher, entered Holy Orders

and became vicar of Davidstowe. His progenitors had furnished the

voices calling to church from the village towers, and now this member

sounded within the church also calling to prayer and praise. His son,

William Pennington, purchased the site of the Priory, Bodmin, in 1788,

having rebuilt the house some twenty years previously under a lease.

He was mayor of Bodmin 1764, 1774, 1787, and died without issue in

1789, bequeathing his possessions to his niece Nancy Hosken, daughter

of his sister Susanna, who had married Anthony Hosken, vicar of

Bodmin and rector of Lesneuth. Nancy married Walter Raleigh Gilbert,

one of the gentlemen of the bedchamber, and descended from the ancient

Devonshire family of Compton Castle. As Mr. Gilbert died without

issue, the Priory passed to his brother, and, consequently, wholly

away from the Penningtons.

FOOTNOTES:

[14] _Deanery of Trigg Minor_, I, p. 301.

[15] At S. Breward the bells were cast in a small garden outside the

churchyard fence, since called "Bell garden."

DOCTOR GLYNN-CLOBERY

This amiable and good man was born at Helland, 5th August, 1719, and was

the son of Robert Glynn, by Lucy, fourth daughter of John Clobery, of

Bradstone, in Devon. A singular fatality attended this ancient family,

that possessed a very interesting Elizabethan mansion. John Clobery had

eight daughters and only one son and heir, and that son died without

issue, and only three of the daughters married. Lucy had but the one

son, Robert Glynn, and the fifth daughter, Mary, also only a son; and as

these sons died unmarried, the estate passed to remote connections.

Robert Glynn assumed his mother's name and succeeded to the estates on

the death of his uncle, William Clobery. Robert Glynn was an M.D. and

a Fellow of King's College, Cambridge, where he resided. He was a

simple-minded man, and was completely taken in by the Chatterton

forgeries, and for some time strenuously defended them. On which

account Horace Walpole speaks of him with great contempt as "an old

doting physician and Chattertonian at Cambridge." "I neither answer

Dr. Glynn, nor a _poissarde_. Twenty years ago I might have laughed at

both, but they are too small fry, and I am too old to take notice of

them. Besides, when leviathans and crocodiles and alligators tempest

and infest the ocean, I shall not go a-privateering in a cockboat

against a smuggling pinnace." That was in August, 1792.

Dr. Glynn was very fond of seeing young gownsmen at his rooms, and had

tea for them and conversed with them; but he never drank tea himself.

C. Carlyon says: "His custom was to walk about the room and talk most

agreeably upon such topics as he thought likely to interest his

company, which did not often consist of more than two or three

persons. As soon as the tea-table was set in order, and the boiling

water ready for making the infusion, the fragrant herb was taken, not

from an ordinary tea-caddy, but from a packet, consisting of several

envelopes curiously put together, in the centre of which was the tea.

Of this he used, at first, as much as would make a good cup for each

of the party; and, to meet fresh demands, I observed that he

invariably put an additional teaspoonful in the teapot; the excellence

of the beverage, thus prepared, ensuring him custom. He had likewise a

superior knack of supplying each cup with sugar from a considerable

distance, by a jerk of the hand which discharged it from the

sugar-tongs into the cup with unerring certainty, as he continued his

walk around the table, scarcely seeming to stop whilst he performed

these and other requisite evolutions of the entertainment."

Dr. Glynn or Clobery would only eat when his appetite summoned him

imperiously for a meal. A faithful old servant was in constant

attendance upon him, and, whenever his master called out for food, he

was prepared to set before him some plain dish and a pewter of porter.

Nothing would induce the doctor to believe that gout was hereditary.

He once took occasion to mark this with peculiar emphasis, when a

writer signing himself W. A. A. consulted him in his first attack,

then in his nineteenth year. He observed, "My young friend, you call

this gout! Pooh, pooh! You have not yet earned the costly privilege;

you must drink your double hogshead first."

"But my father, sir; it is in my blood by right of inheritance."

His reply was, "You talk nonsense. You may as well tell me you have a

broken leg in your veins by inheritance."

One Sunday morning he met an undergraduate of his acquaintance on his

way to S. Mary's Church, and said to him--

"Well, my master, and whither are you going?"

"I am going to S. Mary's," replied the young gownsman.

"And who is the preacher to-day?"

"I don't know."

"Not know who is the preacher? Then, upon my word, you have no small

merit in taking pot-luck at S. Mary's."

During a long illness the good old doctor attended a poor man, of

whose family party a pert, talkative magpie made one; and as the

patient observed that Dr. Glynn always, when paying a visit, had some

joke with the bird, he thought that perhaps the doctor might like to

possess it. Accordingly, when the poor man was well again, with

overflowing gratitude, but with no money to pay a bill, he thought he

could do no better than make his kind friend a present of the magpie;

and sure enough the prisoner in its cage was conveyed to his rooms in

King's College. There the bearer met with a very kind reception, but

was desired to carry back the bird with him. "I cannot," said the

doctor, "take so good care of it as can you; but I shall consider it

mine, and I entrust it to you to keep for me; and, as long as it

lives, I will pay you half-a-crown weekly for its maintenance."

The anecdote was turned into verse by Mr. Plumtre, and is given in

Gunning's _Reminiscences of Cambridge_. When Dr. Glynn assumed the

name of Clobery he assumed also the Clobery arms--three bats; and no

animal could better symbolize the man, with his curious blindness to

what was obvious to most--that the Chatterton papers were forgeries.

He went down to Bristol on purpose to examine the chest with its MS.

contents. The fact that in one of them the invention of heraldry was

ascribed to Hengest, and that of painted glass to an unknown monk in

the reign of King Edmund, did not disturb his faith. He entered into

vehement controversy with George Steevens, in his endeavour to

establish their genuineness. He waxed hot over it, and it took a good

deal to put Glynn-Clobery out of his usual placidity and coolness.

He set up to be a poet. His Seatonian prize poem on the "Day of

Judgment" was thought much of at the time. Previously Christopher

Smart had won the prize over and over again. Glynn wrested the laurels

from him. This is not saying much; his poem was not much better, and

not at all worse, than the general run of these prize poems. But it

had the advantage of pleasing, and has been repeatedly republished,

and has even obtained for the old doctor a niche in the temple of

Poesy--a notice in a _Biographical Dictionary of Poets_.

He died at Cambridge on February 8th, 1800, and at his own desire was

buried at midnight in King's College Chapel.

THREE MEN OF MOUSEHOLE

In the year 1849, Captain Allen Gardiner, an intrepid sailor and a

religious enthusiast, formed the plan of converting the natives of

Terra del Fuego and of Patagonia. He knew nothing of their language or

habits, nothing indeed of their land. He was, however, possessed with

the idea that he was called to be an apostle of those bleak and

fog-wrapped regions. Of all inhabited spots on the earth, the Terra

del Fuego is the most miserable. Cold, whirlwinds and tempests of snow

and hail, frozen fogs with but rare glimpses of sunshine, form its

climate; and the natives are utterly barbarous, apparently the

refugees from the Continent, driven out of the somewhat less desolate

peninsula of Patagonia by the giants that now possess it, and in their

misery sinking to the lowest depths to which man can descend.

During a year or more Captain Gardiner's efforts to rouse interest in

his scheme, sufficient interest to make the money flow, had met with no

success. He applied to the Moravian Brethren to take up the mission;

they declined. Then he placed the matter before the Scottish

Establishment, but the canny Scotchmen would nae think ov it. At last a

lady at Cheltenham furnished him with £700, and this, with £300 from his

own private purse, formed all the resources on which he acted. As he

could not afford to charter a schooner, he had four open boats built for

him at Liverpool. Two of these were launches of considerable size, to

which he gave the names of the _Speedwell_ and the _Pioneer_; the other

two were small dinghies, to be used as tenders or luggage boats.

[Illustration: DOROTHY PENTREATH of MOUSEHOLE in CORNWALL

_the last Person who could converse in the Cornish language?_]

Captain Gardiner now looked about him for enthusiasts like himself to

share the perils and the possible glories of spreading the gospel over

Terra del Fuego, in which not a cross had been planted nor the Word of

God proclaimed.

He secured the services of a surgeon, a missionary, and from

Mousehole, near Penzance, drew three sturdy Cornish sailors, or

fishermen--John Pearce, John Badcock, and John Davy Bryant--who little

knew what risks they ran.

The party left England on September 27th, 1850, in the ship _Ocean

Queen_, bound from Liverpool to California, taking with them their

boats and six months' provisions. They were landed on the inhospitable

foreign shore on the 5th December.

Pinkerton, in his _Modern Geography_, thus graphically describes the

scene of their projected labours:--

"A broken series of wintry islands, called Terra del Fuego, from two

or more volcanoes which vomit flames amidst the dreary wastes of ice.

Terra del Fuego is divided by narrow straits into eleven islands of

considerable size. In their zeal for Natural History, Sir Joseph Banks

and Doctor Solander had nearly perished amid the snows of this

horrible land; but they found a considerable variety of plants. The

natives are of a middle stature, with broad flat faces, high cheeks,

and flat noses, and they are clothed in the skins of seals. The

villages consist of miserable huts in the form of a sugar loaf, and

the only food seems to be shell-fish."

The lack of common prudence, of common sense, exhibited by Captain

Gardiner is astounding. Here was he, with a party whom he had

beguiled to attend him, dropped in this barren country wrapped in snow

and fog, without an interpreter, and consequently without the means of

communication with the inhabitants should they come across them. From

the moment that the sails of the _Ocean Queen_ disappeared behind the

rocks on her way to double Cape Horn, the eye of no civilized man ever

saw these brave sailors and missionaries alive. All that is known of

them has been gathered from the papers subsequently found.

Seven men in all, with four open boats, were left on the most

inhospitable coast that could be found, where there is little food to

be got, where vegetation is scarce. Their resolution was heroic, but

the whole enterprise was madness.

Cornish Characters and Strange Events · 第 15 / 55 段