The gentleman just alluded to being most sensibly affected by the

dejected and squalid appearance of Barrington, made a most successful

use of his influence with government to obtain Barrington’s release,

upon the condition that he should leave the kingdom. To this as

Barrington gladly assented, he generously supplied him with a sum of

money to defray the expense of his removal to Ireland, where it is

understood this unhappy offender always persisted in stating that he

had friends and relatives of credit and character. In London he did not

think proper to stay longer than was needful to procure necessaries for

his journey; he therefore took the Chester coach, and in the course of

a week was enabled to reach the Irish capital, where his fame having

arrived before, he was looked upon with such an eye of suspicion, that

he was shortly apprehended for picking the pocket of an Irish nobleman

of a gold watch and his money at one of the theatres, and was soon

after committed to the New Gaol to be tried upon the charge, but was

acquitted for want of evidence.

Though he was acquitted on this occasion, he was perfectly convinced

that the Irish capital would be too warm to retain him. He quickly

determined to leave Ireland, and accordingly removed to the northern

parts of that kingdom, through which he took his way to Edinburgh,

where he concluded that he might, for some time at least, commit his

depredations with greater safety and facility than he could do either

in London or Dublin.

But, in the opinion which he had formed of the character of the Scots,

he soon learned by experience that he was grossly mistaken; for he was

quickly observed in the capital of Scotland, where the police is more

vigilant and severe than in most other parts of the British dominions.

He therefore thought it prudent to depart from Edinburgh, where his

gleanings were comparatively small.

However, being determined to return to London, he took Chester in his

way, and it being fair-time there, he is said to have contrived to get

possession of the amount of six hundred pounds in cash and bank notes,

with which he got clear off.

Such are the delusions of vice and the fatal sweets of ill-gotten

wealth, that, though additional danger attended his public appearance,

from the infraction of the terms on which he was liberated from his

confinement on board the hulks, (which were those of his leaving the

kingdom and never more returning to it,) still he frequented the

theatres, the Opera House, and the Pantheon, with tolerable success.

But he was now too notorious to be long secure: he was closely watched

and well-nigh detected at the latter of these places; at least, such

strong suspicions were entertained by the magistrates of his conduct on

the occasion, that he was taken into custody, and committed to Newgate.

Here again, for want of evidence, he got clear of the charge brought

against him; but, notwithstanding this, he was unexpectedly detained

at the instance of Mr. Duncan Campbell, the superintendent of the

convicts, for having returned to England in violation of the condition

on which his majesty was pleased to grant him a remission of the

punishment which he was sentenced to undergo on board the hulks; and

the consequence of the detainer was, that he was made what is called

a _fine_ at Newgate, during the unexpired part of the time that he

was originally to have served on the Thames. When the period of his

captivity in this prison expired, he was, as a matter of course, set at

liberty; and as usual, no sooner obtained his liberty, than he returned

to his former practices. He, however, was now more cautious; and being

connected with some accomplices of his own cast, he was not so easily

detected as he might have been with others less experienced.

In a state of alarm and anxiety, he lived a considerable time in

the society of the most profligate and abandoned characters of the

metropolis, when he was seen to pick the pocket of Mr. Le Mesurier,

at Drury-lane playhouse, and was immediately apprehended. Charge of

him was given to one Blandy, a constable, who, through negligence or

corruption, suffered him to make his escape. The proceedings against

him were carried on to an outlawry, and various methods were made use

of to detect him, for nearly two years, without effect.

But while the lawyers were outlawing him, and the constables

endeavoring to take him, he was travelling in various disguises and

characters through the northern counties of this kingdom. He visited

the great towns in those parts as a quack-doctor, or as a clergyman;

sometimes he went with an E. O. table, and sometimes he pretended to

be a rider to a manufacturing house at Birmingham or Manchester; and

travelling on horseback, with a decent deportment and grave appearance,

the account which he thought proper to give of himself was credited,

without any difficulty, by those who questioned him.

But, in spite of all these precautions, it sometimes happened that he

was known by gentlemen whom he met, once particularly in Lincolnshire;

yet no one offered to molest or intercept him, until he arrived at

Newcastle-upon-Tyne, where, on being recognised, he was suspected of

picking pockets, and, on inquiry, was discovered to be an outlaw:

upon which he was removed by a writ of habeas corpus to London, and

imprisoned in Newgate, where he arrived miserable and so dejected, that

on learning his circumstances, some of his friends made a subscription

for him, by which he was enabled to employ counsel, and to take legal

measures to have the outlawry against him reversed.

This being effected, he was tried for the original offence, that of

stealing Mr. Le Mesurier’s purse; but, through the absence of the Rev.

Mr. Adeane, a material witness for the prosecution, he was acquitted.

Being once more enlarged, he again set off for Ireland, in company with

a young man of the name of Hubert, well known in town for his fraud

on the duke of York. With this accomplice, he was so infatuated as to

endeavor to carry on his depredations in Dublin, where it was never

his fortune to remain for any length of time undetected; for, Hubert

being taken in the act of picking a gentleman’s pocket, and handing the

property to Barrington, he with great difficulty made his escape to

England, where he rambled about for some time previously to his arrival

in the capital, which he had scarcely entered, when he was taken into

custody for picking Mr. Henry Hare Townsend’s pocket of a gold watch.

Hubert, his accomplice, was tried at Dublin, and sentenced to

transportation for seven years; but he afterwards contrived to make his

escape.

On Wednesday morning, September 15th, 1790, Barrington was put to the

bar to be arraigned on an indictment charging him with stealing, on the

1st of September, 1790, in the parish of Enfield, a gold watch, chain,

and seals, the property of Henry Hare Townsend, Esq. Upon this occasion

Barrington displayed all the talents which it has been universally

admitted he possessed; but in spite of a long speech, which professed,

whether sincere or assumed, great contrition for his past offences, and

a determination to amend his life for the future, he was convicted, and

sentenced by the judge to seven years’ transportation.

During the voyage to Port Jackson, Barrington rendered an essential

service in quelling a mutiny in the vessel. Upon this occasion the

captain evinced his gratitude for the services he had performed, and

when they had reached the Cape, at the recommendation of the former, he

received a hundred dollars reward for his zeal and activity.

On their arrival at Port Jackson, Barrington having been recommended

to the governor, was placed in the first instance at Tamgabbe as a

subordinate, and was soon advanced to be a principal watchman, in which

situation he acquitted himself as a useful and active officer; insomuch

that the governor determined to withdraw him from the convicts; and at

the same time that he received his instrument of emancipation, he was

presented with a grant of thirty acres of land at Paramatta. He was

subsequently appointed superintendent of the convicts; and although not

permitted to return to England, was invested with all the immunities of

a freeman, a settler, and a civil officer, and had the satisfaction to

know that his diligence and activity were not only without suspicion,

but were fully appreciated.

It was here that Barrington resolved to revise the notes he had taken

during the voyage, and of describing more fully the places they had

touched at. He has accordingly produced a very useful and instructive

work.

In addition to this performance, he compiled a complete history of the

country itself, from its first discovery, comprehending an account

of its original inhabitants, their customs and manners, accompanied

with an historical detail of the proceedings of the colony from its

foundation to his own time.

He continued in the situation in which the governor had placed him till

his death; and performed the duties of his office with an unwearied

assiduity, which at last superinduced a general decay of nature, of

which he died in the year 1811.

JAMES PORTER

Was an Irishman, and a weaver by trade. He had been a robber in his

own country. We know not what events induced him to seek a refuge

in America, or what were his first adventures on this side of the

Atlantic. We first find him in Philadelphia, ostensibly working

at his trade, but in reality gaining his livelihood by dishonest

practices. He had two accomplices, George Wilson and Abraham Poteet,

weavers, who had learned their trade in the penitentiary. The former

was but twenty-three years of age; yet, though his days were few,

his iniquities were many. Poteet had been convicted at the Baltimore

city court of stealing four handkerchiefs, for which he was sentenced

to five years’ imprisonment. For a second theft he was sentenced

to imprisonment. He had also been convicted of breaking prison, of

attempting a stage robbery and wounding the driver, and of shooting at

the keeper of the Baltimore penitentiary. He was a native of Baltimore,

and Wilson also was an American. They became acquainted in the

penitentiary, and were jointly concerned in the attempt to break out,

in which the life of the keeper was endangered. Such were James Porter

and his associates.

Porter and Poteet became tired of stealing _wee things_, for so silver

spoons were denominated by Porter, and resolved to rob the Reading

mail, in order to make their fortune at once. To prepare for this

exploit Porter and Wilson crossed the Schuylkill, on the 20th of

November, 1829, and broke into the shop of Mr. Watt, a gunsmith. They

took thence five pistols and two powder-flasks. After this the three

companions repeatedly practised with their pistols to ascertain their

qualities.

On the 6th of December, the mail stage started from Philadelphia at two

in the morning, driven by one Samuel M’Crea. There were nine passengers

inside, and another on the box with the driver. The night was dark and

cloudy. When the stage had got two miles from the city and was nearly

opposite Turner’s lane, Porter started from the road-side, took the off

leading horse by the head and turned him round. At the same time Wilson

and Poteet came up, one on each side of the coach, with presented

pistols, bidding the driver stop, “or they would blow his d--d brains

out.” He struck the horses with his whip, but could not make them go

forward. Poteet then ordered the driver and the passenger who sat

beside him to come down. The driver obeyed, and the passenger was about

descending, when Porter swore at his comrades for not putting out the

lamps. Poteet put out the lamp on his side with the butt of his pistol:

Wilson merely broke the glass of the lamp next him. Porter then left

the horses’ heads, ran up and dashed the light out with his pistol. He

asked the passenger if he had any weapons, and being answered in the

negative, took his handkerchief and tied his hands with it. The robbers

then rifled the passenger and bound the driver. Poteet asked the driver

if he did not think this a very rough introduction. He answered that it

was. The robber then asked him if he got his living by stage driving,

and he replied that he did, and “it was a hard way too.” “Well,” said

the ruffian, “this is the way we get our living, and ’tis very hard

with us sometimes.” While these matters were going on Poteet and Wilson

held their pistols in their hands, but Porter, more collected, thrust

his into his bosom.

This done, Porter and Poteet went to the doors, while Wilson watched

the two bondmen. Porter told the passengers they should receive no

injury if they did not resist. A Mr. Clarke proposed to attack the

robbers, but was overruled by the rest of the passengers. The gentlemen

then concealed some of their valuables. Porter asked if any of them

were armed, and being answered in the negative, answered sneeringly,

that “it was a pity.”

The thieves next compelled the true men to alight, one by one. Porter

searched them, and tied their hands with their kerchiefs. As fast as

he tied them he turned them over to Poteet, who kept them quiet with

his pistol. One of the passengers, after being tied, asked the robbers

for a quid of tobacco, which was put into his mouth by Poteet. Another

was very reluctant to part with his watch, which he said had been long

in his family, and at his urgent entreaty Poteet restored it. From

another, who was a physician, Poteet took the seal of a corporation and

a case of lancets, but put them back into the doctor’s pockets on being

told what they were. The gentleman then asked Porter for half a dollar

to pay for his breakfast, and the robber complied. Another of the

passengers asked Porter to restore his papers. “O,” said the ruffian,

“I dare say all this business will be published, and then I shall know

where to direct the papers. I will send you a letter.”

Mr. Clarke was the last but one who came out of the coach. As Porter

was plundering him he said, that if the other passengers had followed

his advice they would not have been robbed. “Well done!” replied the

robber. “I like to see a man of spunk.” After being tied, Mr. Clarke

walked up to Poteet, in order to be able to recognise him if they

should meet again. The rogue bade him stand off. “I hope,” said Mr.

Clarke, “you are not afraid of a small man, and he bound too.” “No,

sir,” said Poteet, “but I don’t want to be better acquainted with

you.” “I hope,” rejoined Mr. Clarke, “that we shall have a longer

acquaintance than this yet.” “I hope not, sir,” said Poteet. On Mr.

Clarke’s again observing that the passengers would have done better

to resist, Porter remarked that if they had, they would have seen the

consequences.

After the passengers had all been examined, the robbers took the

baggage out of the coach and from before and behind it. They then tried

to open the boot in which the mail bags were contained, but finding

some difficulty, they compelled the driver to do it. Mr. Clarke now

remarked that another stage would soon be along, and this intelligence

quickened their proceedings. One of them busied himself in rifling the

mails and trunks, while the other two put the passengers into the coach

again without untying them. They tied the driver again and lifted him

into his seat, after which they tied the leading horses to the fence by

the road side. This done, the robbers went off, so softly that neither

the driver nor any of the passengers were aware of their departure.

The gentlemen sat still in the coach some minutes after they were gone,

till one of them contrived to untie himself, and unbound the rest.

After some consultation, it was thought best to return to the city.

When they arrived at the post-office a person was despatched to the

scene of the robbery, where he found the mail bags cut open and the

packages and newspapers scattered around, but the villains had carried

away the letters.

On the 16th of December, Wilson carried one of the watches they had

taken to Crosswell Holmes, a pawnbroker, and pledged it for twenty

dollars. He said he was a carpenter unable to get employment, and

was therefore obliged to raise money on his watch. He agreed to pay

Mr. Holmes in -- days, with two dollars commission, and signed the

obligation “John James, North Second street.”

On the 21st, Porter carried another watch (a golden one) to a Mr.

Prentiss, a pawnbroker, and asked sixty dollars on it. Mr. Prentiss

refused to advance more than forty-five, when Porter left him, saying

he could get fifty anywhere. On this occasion he represented himself as

a carpenter, who wanted money to repair his house. The next day Wilson

called on Mr. Prentiss with the same watch, saying the gentleman who

owned it had made up his mind to take the forty-five dollars offered,

and that he would act as his agent. Mr. Prentiss gave him the money,

and wrote a receipt, which Wilson signed “George Brown, for John Keys.”

Nothing occurred to direct suspicion to either of our rogues as the

robbers of the mail till the middle of January, when a Mr. Jeffers, a

police officer of Baltimore, found reason to believe that Poteet and

Wilson were the persons who shot at the keeper of the penitentiary and

at the stage driver before mentioned. He sought them, and found Wilson

first, in a tavern. The robber drew a pistol from his pocket and bade

Mr. Jeffers stand off, but the latter seized him by the wrist and

collar and held him till the landlord came into the room. The landlord

took the pistol from Wilson at the request of Jeffers, who then asked

the culprit for the other, but he denied having any. However, after the

police officer had nearly strangled him he gave up another. Mr. Jeffers

thrust him into a chair, when he said, “Let me stand up, and I’ll give

it to you.” With the landlord’s assistance, Mr. Jeffers took him to a

magistrate’s office. He was committed to prison.

The next day Mr. Jeffers visited him, and told him he had heard that

two men had offered to pawn a gold watch, and he believed from the

description that he was one of them. At the same time he gave Wilson a

description of the other man. Wilson replied that it was Porter, and

but for him, he, Wilson, would not have been in this difficulty. He

added that Porter had a better right to suffer than himself, and he

would therefore disclose the whole matter. His story, as told to Mr.

Jeffers, was as follows.

He had gone out three several times with Porter to rob the Lancaster

mail, but his heart failing him, they returned without effecting their

purpose. When Porter and Poteet proposed to rob the Reading mail, he

would have had nothing to do with it, had he not feared that Porter

would kill him if he refused. He then described the robbery, and the

part each had taken in it, pretty much as we have related above. While

the pillage was going on, he said, he was very anxious to get away, but

Porter declared he would not hurry himself. He added that he was sorry

he had ever seen Porter. He was steady at work in Philadelphia till he

came and seduced him from his employment. He believed Porter would as

lief kill a man as eat his breakfast. All this confession took place

without any inducement on the part of Jeffers.

This confession put the police of Baltimore on the look-out for Porter

and Poteet. On the ninth of February, Mr. Stewart, a constable, met

Porter in the street, and accosted him with a question concerning his

health. He added that he had been looking for him all day, and must

now take him with him. Porter asked him what he wanted, and on what

authority he arrested him. The officer replied that he carried his

authority in his face, and then asked if he knew Wilson or Poteet, or

could tell where they might be found. He denied all knowledge of them,

but followed Mr. Stewart quietly to his house. The officer searched

him, and took from him a powder-flask and a pair of pistols. Porter

asked if he meant to keep them, and the constable replied that he did.

Porter very sternly said, “I hope I shall live to buy another pair for

somebody.” He admitted before a magistrate that he knew Poteet.

Mr. Stewart conducted Wilson to Philadelphia first, and Porter

afterwards. After they got into the stage, Wilson said that he believed

his case was hopeless, and that he would plead guilty to every charge

brought against him. Mr. Stewart asked him if he were not afraid to

undertake to rob a stage so full of passengers. “No,” replied the

villain, “three good men could rob a dozen at any time.”

Poteet was also arrested, and consented to save his own life by

becoming state’s evidence.

Porter’s demeanor after his arrest was marked by that cool courage that

seems to have been the only favorable trait in his character. He spoke

freely of his past life, without showing the least compunction, and

said that if the passengers had resisted, he would not have scrupled to

shed blood.

On the 26th of April, 1830, James Porter and George Wilson were brought

before the circuit court, and the grand jury presented six bills of

indictment against them.

They pleaded not guilty to all these indictments, and applied for

separate trials, which was granted.

On the trial Wilson was identified as one of the robbers, by the

evidence of some of the passengers, as well as that of Poteet. The

watches taken from the passengers, and pawned by him, were produced in

court and sworn to. So were the weapons stolen from Mr. Watt’s shop.

The other facts relating to the robbery were proved, in substance, as

we have given them.

The jury found a verdict of guilty.

Porter was next arraigned, and found guilty on the same evidence.

Sentence of death was passed upon him and Wilson. After sentence Porter

showed contrition, but suffered with the same hardihood that he had

exhibited throughout. We can accord him no pity. He was the master

spirit, the ringleader, the captain of a band of highway robbers. He

had collected a gang about him, drilled, marshalled, and equipped them,

and led them forth to an unholy warfare against the peace and interest

of society.

Wilson was pardoned by president Jackson; for what reason, we cannot

pretend to divine. The pardon set forth that certain disclosures were

expected from him but we never heard that he made any.

Transcriber’s Notes

Obvious errors in punctuation were fixed.

Some of the illustrations were relocated to be closer to the relevant

content.

Page 38: “not much dis-disposed” changed to “not much disposed”

Page 74: “question whe- the loss” changed to “question whether the loss”

Page 115: “he ad not made a word” changed to “he had not made a word”

Page 186: “he barricadoed” changed to “he barricaded”

Page 193: “two of the villians” changed to “two of the villains”

Page 233: “considerable innkeeqer” changed to “considerable innkeeper”

Lives and exploits of the most noted highwaymen, robbers and murderers of all nations Drawn from the most authentic sources and brought down to the present time · 第 21 / 21 段