C. L. Greaves, Esq., Fulham, Lay Fellow.

T. Dodd, Esq., Curator to the Bodleian Library, Oxford, Lay

Fellow.

W. F. Harrison, Esq., Rochester, Lay Fellow.

R. Call, Esq., of Tavistock Street, Bedford Square, Lay Fellow,

and Professor of Architectural Acoustics.

Mr. W. H. Rogers, of Great Newport Street, Illuminator.

We recommend architects, architectural students, and patrons of

architecture to join this institution, the advantages of which promise to

be great, and the costs small.

PUBLIC FOOTPATHS, &c.

The following letter is so generally applicable to the subject of the

management of the roads and footways in the environs of large towns, that

we insert it as much on that account as for the particular drift which

recommends it to the attention of our metropolitan readers:—

_To the Editor of the Morning Herald._

“Sir,—The readiness with which you insert notices of public

grievances, and the effect which these notices always have

in drawing attention to them, induces me to state to you a

serious inconvenience to which the inhabitants of Bayswater are

subject, in the hope that it may through your pages attract the

attention of the Metropolitan Road Commission.

“It is simply this that the footpath of a considerable portion

of the Bayswater-road, between the end of Oxford-street and

the door into Kensington-gardens, is during wet weather,

and especially after frost, in a worse state than any other

footpath, as far as I know, in the neighbourhood of London;

in fact, though in the immediate suburbs of the metropolis,

it has, with its wide and deep open ditch, and rough hedge

bank, all the characteristics of a footpath in a remote

rural district. It requires only to be inspected, to produce

conviction that it ought no longer to remain in its present

disgraceful state. On the other side of the road, approaching

the door into Kensington-gardens, there is another open

ditch, which serves as a common sewer to the houses in its

neighbourhood; and the fœtid exhalations from this ditch in

the warm weather, and the filthy appearance of the water in it

at all times, are disgraceful to the public authorities; more

especially in these days, when so much attention is being paid

to public drainage, and other sanitary measures.

“The parish authorities have been repeatedly applied to,

but their answer is, that it is the business of the Road

Commissioners to attend to these footpaths and ditches.

“As to the footpaths, they ought to be paved, or laid with

asphalte; but if it be too expensive to pave the whole width

of the footpath, a strip of two feet wide, along the middle,

would be a great accommodation to females and aged persons,

and to workmen going to and returning from their work in the

morning and evenings. Some years ago you published a letter

of mine, in which I endeavoured to point out the advantages

that would result from paving a narrow strip along the middle

of the footpaths, or two separate strips along such as were

much frequented, on all the footpaths round London for several

miles distant. Besides the obvious accommodation to females and

infirm persons which this strip of pavement or asphalte would

afford, it would enable mechanics going to their work to walk

nearly as fast again as they do now, and consequently they

might have their dwellings farther out in the country, where

they would pay lower rents, and sleep in better air. Strips of

Yorkshire pavement two feet wide might be laid down at 1s. 3d.

per foot in length, or cheaper if the contract were made for

laying down several miles of it.

“As for the ditches on the Bayswater-road, they require only an

18-inch barrel-drain, and filling up to the level of the path.

“If I might farther trespass on your pages, I would direct

public attention to the manner in which the trees and

shrubs along footpaths are cut and mangled by the parochial

road-surveyors in the suburbs of London. On the south side

of roads lying in the direction of east and west, it may be

advantageous to cut off all those branches which overhang the

footpath, the better to admit the sun and wind to act on its

surface; but surely the Act of Parliament which directs the

lopping of trees overhanging roads, need not be so rigidly

enforced in the case of streets running in the direction from

north to south, along the whole surface of which the sun shines

a portion of every day throughout the year when he appears;

whereas on the south sides of east and west streets, during a

portion of every day in the year, he does not shine at all.

The street from which I date this letter consists of detached

houses, each surrounded by a garden, the low trees and large

shrubs in which slightly overhang the footpath, or rather, I

should say, break and vary the line of the front palisades,

and render the street one of the most picturesque in the

immediate neighbourhood of town; but of late a new parochial

road-surveyor acting, no doubt with the best intentions,

according to the letter of the law, has given notice to all

the occupants to cut off the overhanging branches, which

having been done by the greater number of occupants, even to

the cutting off of the projecting tufts of ivy, has produced

a formal line of amputation which disfigures the street,

without doing any good whatever. In the case of a north and

south street, it is surely sufficient to cut off all branches

that would impede a tall person carrying an umbrella, or which

reach as far as the curb-stone, and might be in the way of

the cart or carriage taking up or setting down. I understand

that in such a case as this there is no appeal, except to the

magistrates, who of course can only point to the law.

“I hope this last subject may be considered as coming within

the province of the Metropolitan Commission for Improvements

lately formed, and if so, I hope they will consider this letter

as an appeal to them.

“It never can be the intention of the Legislature to disfigure

any public road or street when doing so is attended with no

public good whatever.

“Apologizing for the length of this letter, and hoping you will

be able to spare room for it,

“I remain, Sir, your obedient servant,

“J. C. LOUDON.

“No. 3, Porchester-terrace, Bayswater,

“February 14th, 1843.”

The Builder, No. 2, February 18, 1843 · 第 15 / 31 题