IV

Those who are in the habit of gaging the drama by this literary quality

only are prone to deplore the bad taste of the public which flocks to

purely spectacular pieces. But this again is no new thing, and it does

not disclose any decline in the ability to appreciate the best. A

century ago in London, when Sarah Siddons and John Philip Kemble were in

the full plenitude of their powers, and when they were performing the

noblest plays of Shakspere, they were thrust aside for a season or two

while the theater was given up to empty melodramatic spectacles like

'Castle Specter' and the 'Cataract of the Ganges.' It was horrifying to

the lovers of the drama that these great actors in those great plays

should have to give way to the attraction exerted on the public by a

trained elephant, or by an imitation waterfall; but it is equally

horrifying to be informed that the theater in London for which Shakspere

wrote his masterpieces, and in which he himself appeared as an actor,

was also used for fencing-matches, and for bull-baitings and

bear-baitings, and that the theater in Athens for which Sophocles wrote

his masterpieces, and in which he may have appeared as an actor, was

also used for the annual cock-fight.

So strong is the popular appreciation of spectacle that the drama, the

true theater as distinguished from the mere show business, has always to

fight for its right to exist, and to hold its place in competition with

less intellectual and more sensational entertainments. The playhouses of

any American city are likely to have a lean week whenever the circus

comes to town, and perhaps the chief reason why the most of them now

close in summer is to be sought not so much in the frequent hot spells,

as in the irresistible attraction exerted by the base-ball games. The

drama in Spain, which flourished superbly in the days of Lope de Vega

and Calderon, sank into a sad decline when it had to compete with the

fiercer delights of the bullfight; and the drama in Rome was actually

killed out by the overpowering rivalry of the sports of the arena, the

combats of gladiators, and the matching of men with wild beasts. What is

known to the economists as Gresham's Law, according to which an inferior

currency always tends to drive out a superior, seems to have an analog

in the show business.

(1912.)

A Book About the Theater · 第 55 / 158 题