_Mephitis foetulenta_ Elliot, Field Columb. Mus., Publ. 32, zoöl.

ser., 1:269, March, 1899 (type from Laguna, near Port Angeles,

Clallam County, Washington).

_Chincha occidentalis spissigrada_ Howell, N. Amer. Fauna, 20:35,

August 31, 1901.

_Mephitis mephitis spissigrada_ Hall, Carnegie Inst. Publ. 473:67,

November 20, 1936.

_Type._--Obtained at Sumas [prairie], British Columbia, by A.

Brooks on September 30, 1895; type in Museum of Comparative

Zoölogy.

_Racial characters._--Similar to _hudsonica_ but larger; stripes

broader, usually diverging on shoulders; hairs of stripes often

cream color or yellowish near base; end of tail usually white.

_Measurements._--An adult male from 2-1/2 miles southeast of

Chinook, Pacific County, measures: total length 578; length of

tail 260; hind foot 30. A female from the same place and one from

Renton, King County, average: 575; 233; 72; 27.

_Distribution._--Lowlands of western Washington. This form rarely

goes far into the mountains except along the valleys of the larger

rivers. Marginal records are Skykomish (W. W. D.) and Washougal

River (W. W. D.).

=Taxidea taxus taxus= (Schreber)

Badger

_Ursus taxus_ Schreber, Saugethiere, 3:520, 1778.

_Taxidea taxus_ Rhoads, Amer. Nat., 28:524, June, 1894.

_Taxidea taxus neglecta_ Taylor and Shaw, Occ. Pap. Chas. R.

Conner Mus., no. 2:12, December, 1929.

_Taxidea taxus taxus_ Hall, Carnegie Inst. Washington, Publ.

473:78, November 20, 1936.

_Type._--None. Type locality probably southwest of Hudson Bay

(Hall, 1936: 78).

_Measurements._--Two males from northern Nevada measure,

respectively: total length 780, 762; length of tail 113, 150; hind

foot 136, 120; ear 55, 54; weight 15, 11 pounds.

_Distribution._--Of general distribution over open country east of

the Cascades. Marginal records are Wauconda (Taylor and Shaw,

1929: 12), Chelan (Taylor and Shaw, 1929: 13), Goldendale (W. W.

D.) and "Divide above Trout Lake" (trapper's photograph).

[Illustration: FIG. 66. Badger (_Taxidea taxus taxus_), tame animal in

Seattle, Washington. January 29, 1938. Captured at Lakeside, Chelan

County, and photographed at approximate age of ten months; subadult

male. (Eloise Kuntz photo.)]

_Description._--The badger is the size of a small dog, measuring up to

32 inches in total length and weighing up to 20 pounds. The body is

heavy, powerful and remarkably flat and compressed. The tail and legs

are short. The forelegs are thick and strong, armed with long heavy

claws for digging. The ears are wide and low. The color of the upper

parts is a grizzled yellowish brown, not unlike the color of the

yellow-bellied marmot. The underparts are buffy, often with a white area

on the abdomen. The legs, feet, top of head, ears, and small areas on

the cheeks are blackish. Triangular areas about the eyes are buffy. A

white stripe extends from the nose pad backwards, between the eyes, to

the shoulders and serves as the best recognition mark.

[Illustration: FIG. 67. Distribution of the badger, _Taxidea taxus

taxus_, in Washington.]

Badgers are found over central and western United States, Canada and

northern Mexico. They are commonest on the plains and desert,

principally because the burrowing mammals upon which they feed are most

abundant there. The badger is a powerful and rapid digger, being able to

overtake and capture mice, ground squirrels, and even pocket gophers.

Perry (1939: 49-53) in her interesting accounts of the habits of a pet

badger obtained at Lakeside, Chelan County, found the animal powerful

enough to dig through a concrete floor! Evidence of badger's activities

are usually seen at any ground squirrel colony in eastern Washington.

This evidence consists of large holes in the ground. Rarely a horizontal

tunnel begins at the depth of two to four feet and extends for an

unknown distance. Earth removed in excavating is heaped beside one or

both of the narrower sides of the surface opening.

In examining badger workings in ground squirrel colonies I have been

impressed by the fact that most of the holes ended not more than four or

five feet from the entrances--perhaps at the places where the ground

squirrel nests were located, although it may be that the digging of the

badger so terrified the squirrels that they dashed out in an attempt to

escape past the badger, before he reached the nests. Kangaroo rats and

pocket mice often attempt to escape by dashing past a person when he is

excavating their burrows.

The power of the short, thick and slightly bowed foreleg of the badger

is tremendous. The claws are stout and fully an inch long. The animal is

able to break up and remove at a scoop, the baked, claylike loess of the

Columbian Plateau. Clods of this same material are so firm that only by

twisting and exerting considerable power was I able to break them. The

soil a foot beneath the sunbaked crust is softer and more easily worked.

It is difficult to estimate the size of badger populations. In the arid

land of eastern Washington their diggings may exist almost unchanged for

many years. Interviews with professional trappers serve to indicate

their range and numbers as follows: southeastern edge of the Cascades

and Yakima Valley, not common, rarely straying up into

mountains--average trapper's catch, only one to three a year; Okanogan

Valley and northeastern edge of Cascades, not common--average trapper's

catch is six to ten a year, occasional trappers catching as many as 35;

Columbia, Kettle River, and other valleys in northeastern Washington,

uncommon, a few records only; Columbian Plateau, fairly common--average

professional trapper's yearly catch includes 10 to 20 badgers;

southeastern Washington, now rare because of overtrapping, formerly

common.

Trappers state that the badgers taken in northeastern Washington are

usually classified as "hair badger" by fur buyers and bring only a

dollar or two. The badgers of the eastern Cascades are "fur" badgers but

do not bring top prices. The badgers of the Columbian Plateau bring the

best prices. Seemingly some geographic variation exists among badgers in

Washington. Those from the more humid areas of northeastern Washington

and the eastern Cascades are darker and bring poorer prices than the

paler "silver" badgers of the more open desert areas.

The principal food of the badger in Washington seems to be ground

squirrels, _Citellus washingtoni_, _townsendii_, _columbianus_, or

_saturatus_, depending on locality. Pocket mice, gophers, and other

mammals are also eaten, as are grasshoppers, sword-tailed crickets,

other insects, and birds.

Young of badgers number 3 to 5 and are born in late April, May, or early

June.

=Vulpes fulva cascadensis= Merriam

Red fox

_Vulpes cascadensis_ Merriam, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 2:665,

December 28, 1900.

_Vulpes fulvus cascadensis_ Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 55:281, August

29, 1936.

_Type._--Obtained at Trout Lake, Klickitat County, Washington, by

P. Schmid on March 3, 1898; type in United States National Museum.

_Racial characters._--Skull heavy, narrow; color yellowish.

_Measurements._--A male from Crater Lake, Klamath County, Oregon,

measures: total length 1113; length of tail 441; hind foot 180;

ear 112; weight 9 pounds.

_Distribution._--From Trout Lake northward, through the higher

Cascades, to Loomis (Taylor and Shaw, 1929: 13).

_Description._--The red fox of the Cascades is large and measures about

4 feet in total length, of which the tail comprises 15 inches. The body

is slender and doglike; the legs long and slim; the tail thick and

bushy, and the ears are large and erect. In the red phase the red fox of

the Cascades is distinctly more yellowish than the red fox of the

eastern United States; the head is especially yellow. The body has more

red on the shoulder area than posteriorly, and is darkest on the rump.

The tail is rather pale with a dusky, not black, area distally and a

white tip. The ears are dusky. The lower legs and feet are black. The

throat, chest and underparts are white. The "cross" phase, according to

Cowan (1938: 202-206), is rather common in the Cascades. In cross foxes

the color is darker, brown rather than yellowish, and the area from the

nape of the neck back between the shoulders, including a bar across the

shoulders, is deep blackish or grayish brown. In a pelt that is

stretched out a cross is formed by the dark areas. The black and silver

phases of the red fox are also said by Cowan to be relatively common in

the Cascades, constituting 48 per cent of the population. Of 3,163 foxes

traded at Fort Colville, in northeastern Washington, only 19 per cent

were silver or cross. One fox, trapped in Okanogan County, is said by

its captor to have been black above and straw colored beneath, with no

white on the body.

Red foxes range from Alaska and northern Canada well southward into the

United States. Related forms occur in Eurasia.

The red fox of Washington is an alpine animal, ranging at or slightly

below timber-line. Here food is abundant in summer and fall but must be

scarce in winter. In winter its habitat is difficult for man to reach

and few persons penetrate the dangerous terrain where the fox lives. A

few professional trappers regularly catch foxes in the Cascades but know

little of their habits.

The feces of red foxes examined by Taylor and Shaw on Mt. Rainier

contained remains of insects and berries (Taylor and Shaw, 1927: 43).

The red fox is rare in Washington; it lives in inaccessible territory

and its fur is not especially valuable. The animal is of relatively

little economic importance.

The brood den of a red fox found by Livezey and Evendan (1943: 500) near

Corvallis, Oregon, was two-thirds of the way up a 300-foot hill in a

strip of oaks (_Quercus garryana_). Well-packed trails led to an

entrance concealed in poison oak (_Rhus diversiloba_). Remains of a

turkey, 5 ground squirrels, and a jack rabbit were found near the den.

The entrance was 8 inches wide and 15 inches high. The tunnel tapered to

5 inches in diameter and was 47 feet long. Seven pups, 4 males and 3

females, were found in the den.

[Illustration: FIG. 68. Distribution of the red fox in Washington. A.

_Vulpes fulva cascadensis._ B. _Vulpes fulva macroura._ (See p. 450.)]

=Canis latrans= Say

Coyote

_Description._--The coyote is a large carnivore, about the size and

general proportions of a small collie dog but with bushier tail, and

more slender body. Adults measure about four feet in length, of which

the tail comprises a fourth. Adult males weigh about 30 pounds. The

color is somewhat variable, yellowish, buffy, or grayish. The muzzle and

backs of the ears are more reddish, and the legs brown. The tail is

yellowish gray with a dusky tip. The throat, chest and underparts are

white.

[Illustration: FIG. 69. Coyote (_Canis latrans lestes_), in trap, 5

miles southeast of McKenna, Washington, April 10, 1924. (Fish and

Wildlife Service photo by G. R. Bach, No. 26901.)]

The coyote ranges from Alaska southward, over western North America, to

Central America.

At the present time the coyote ranges over almost all of Washington,

except for the highest parts of the mountains and the dense forest areas

of western Washington. According to available information it was not

found about Puget Sound or the Olympic Peninsula until relatively recent

times. Some old trappers are of the opinion that coyotes did not come

into western Washington until the timber wolves became rare there. The

scarcity of the timber wolves seems to coincide with settlement,

clearing and lumbering. Probably coyotes did not become common in

western Washington until lumbering provided extensive clearings and open

areas more suitable to them than forest. Certainly coyotes and wolves

existed together in eastern Washington.

It is difficult to determine whether coyotes were completely absent from

western Washington in the early days or simply scarce. The glacial

prairies of the Puget Sound area provide suitable habitat for coyotes

and coyotes are abundant there at the present time. If coyotes were

present at all in western Washington in the early days it is reasonable

to suppose that they would have been common on the prairies. Yet I was

told by an old trapper who had lived near Scotts Prairie, Mason County,

for many years, that he had never seen or _heard_ coyotes there until

about 1910. Although a coyote might be mistaken for a small wolf, the

call, as this trapper pointed out, is distinctive.

The principal habitat requirement of the coyote seems to be extensive

areas of open country. This it finds in the desert area of the Columbian

Plateau, the open forests of northeastern Washington and the eastern

Cascades, and in the extensive timbered and burned-over lands in western

Washington. In summer coyotes range well up into the Hudsonian Life-zone

of the Cascade and Olympic mountains. Their principal range is lower, in

the Transition and Upper Sonoran life-zones.

The coyotes are both nocturnal and diurnal. In the vicinity of human

habitations they are most active at night. In the heat of the day they

take refuge in brushy areas or small gullies. Many actions of the coyote

are doglike, and were it not for the large, round, bushy tail, a coyote

might easily be mistaken for a dog. The tail is carried in a drooped

position with the tip bowed slightly backwards. When badly frightened

and running at full speed the tail is stretched out straight behind. The

ordinary gait is a purposeful trot with the head held erect, the ears

pricked up, and the legs moving smoothly and effortlessly. Near Moses

Lake, Grant County, I watched a coyote trot along the side of one of a

series of small sand dunes. At the report of the small shotgun fired at

it, the coyote's dignified trot changed to terrified bounds, its feet

dug into the dune, throwing showers of sand into the air, as it crossed

several successive dunes in full flight before turning to take advantage

of the shelter of a draw between two dunes. A coyote chased by an

automobile attained a speed of 43 miles an hour for a short distance

(Zimmerman, 1943: 400).

I have not watched a coyote stalk game, but as described to me it creeps

up to within a few yards of its prey and catches it with a sudden dash.

In hunting a jack rabbit, the coyote is said to pursue it, taking

advantage of short cuts, until close enough to seize it.

Better known than the coyote itself is its howl--several doglike barks,

each successive one of a series shorter and higher pitched, the last one

ending in a long, drawn-out howl. In the winter of 1936 the coyotes near

Cottage Lake, King County, were especially vociferous. They ordinarily

began to howl about 9 p.m., but could be induced to howl earlier by

imitating their call. Their howling was a signal for all nearby

ranchers' dogs to howl in reply. In the desert areas of eastern

Washington I heard coyotes most often just at dusk or at dawn.

The coyote is principally carnivorous, feeding on any mammals and birds

easy to kill. It willingly eats carrion, even when much decayed. Large

insects such as grasshoppers and crickets are eaten when they are

abundant and easily caught. Fruit and berries are eaten when available.

Sperry (1941) reported on the analysis of the contents of 8,339 coyote

stomachs from various places in the United States, 1,186 of the stomachs

being from Washington. The following information is from his report on

all of the 8,339 stomachs: rabbits formed one-third of the food;

_Microtus_ was found in 7 per cent of the stomachs; _Peromyscus_ in 6

per cent; _Neotoma_ in 4 per cent. _Reithrodontomys_ were found in 53 of

the 8,339 stomachs and in insignificant numbers. _Onychomys_ occurred in

11 of the 8,339 stomachs; _Clethrionomys_ in 8. _Ondatra_ occurred in 8

of the 8,339. Two muskrats were in stomachs obtained from Washington.

_Citellus_ (exclusive of _beecheyi_, _lateralis_, and _saturatus_) were

found in 4 per cent and were locally important; _Citellus beecheyi_

occurred in 84 stomachs, including 1 from Washington; _Citellus

lateralis_ and _saturatus_ occurred in 50 stomachs, including 5 from

Washington. _Marmota_ were found in 1 per cent of the stomachs. They

were included in stomachs from Washington but the number was not

reported. _Tamias_ (= _Eutamias_) were found in 43 stomachs from western

United States and were present in 1 per cent of the 1,186 stomachs from

Washington. _Sciurus_ and _Tamiasciurus_ occurred in 33 stomachs.

Included were 3 _Tamiasciurus douglasii_, a _Tamiasciurus hudsonicus_,

and a _Sciurus griseus_ from Washington. _Glaucomys_ occurred in 6

Washington-taken coyotes, of a total of 11 from the entire United

States. _Perognathus_ occurred in 3 per cent of the stomachs, and 274

individuals were represented. They were found in 10 per cent of the

1,186 Washington stomachs. _Thomomys_ occurred in 4 per cent of the

stomachs examined and in 7 per cent of the stomachs from Washington.

_Erethizon_ appeared in 2 per cent of the stomachs (135 records),

including some from Washington. _Aplodonta_ occurred in only 11

stomachs, all taken in Washington. Locally, it is concluded, mountain

beavers are important coyote food. House mice occurred in but five

stomachs, including 2 from Washington. _Zapus_ did not occur in coyote

stomachs from Washington. Domestic sheep and goats formed 7 per cent of

the food of Washington coyotes. Calves occurred in 3 stomachs of coyotes

from Washington. Pigs occurred in 8. Deer formed 3 per cent, by volume,

of coyote food in Washington. A part of the stock and deer reported was

doubtless carrion.

One shrew was found in the stomach of a coyote from Washington, and two

stomachs contained moles. A house cat was eaten by one Washington

coyote, and another coyote had eaten a raccoon. Birds occurred in 13 per

cent of the stomachs examined but formed only a small part by volume.

Poultry formed one-fourth of this volume. Reptiles formed 0.08 per cent

of the food eaten by coyotes and occurred in 3 per cent of the stomachs.

A coyote from Washington had eaten a garter snake. No frogs were found

in coyote stomachs. A coyote from Washington had eaten a salamander.

Another had eaten a fish. Insects formed 1.08 per cent of the total food

eaten by coyotes. Fruit formed 3.63 per cent. Carrion constituted 25.2

per cent of the total food eaten.

It is extremely difficult to draw conclusions regarding the economic

value of any species. Much depends on the outlook of the individual, his

occupation, the locality where the animal occurs and local conditions

there. Furthermore it is impossible to understand and fairly weigh all

the factors involved.

Coyotes destroy game and stock. They also eat carrion and destroy sick

animals, thus preventing the spread of disease. They eat jack rabbits

which are pests, and snowshoes and cottontails which are game. They eat

mice, which are a pest in agricultural areas, a benefit on rangelands

where they destroy weed seeds, and of neutral importance elsewhere. To

analyze the economic value of the coyote, the economic importance of

all animals on which it feeds must be considered and the "good" and

"bad" balanced--a well-nigh impossible task.

In any event, the coyote has been judged and found guilty. Coyotes are

controlled by poison, trapping, and bounty. In spite of control measures

the coyote is holding its own in numbers or increasing.

Stimulated in part by the bounty, professional trappers take many

coyotes each year in Washington. The pelts fluctuate in value from year

to year but a large, prime skin usually brings from 5 to 10 dollars.

[Illustration: FIG. 70. Distribution of the coyote in Washington. A.

_Canis latrans lestes._ B. _Canis latrans incolatus._]

=Canis latrans lestes= Merriam

_Canis lestes_ Merriam, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 11:25, March

15, 1897.

_Canis latrans lestes_ Taylor and Shaw, Mamm. and Birds Mt.

Rainier Nat. Park, p. 41, 1927.

_Type._--Obtained in the Toyabe Mountains near Cloverdale, Nye

County, Nevada, by V. Bailey on November 21, 1890; type in United

States National Museum.

_Racial characters._--Frontal region of skull only slightly

concave.

_Measurements._--A male from 20 miles south of Ephrata, Grant

County, on the Columbian Plateau, measures: total length 1185;

length of tail 365; hind foot 198; ear 125; weight 26-1/2 lbs. A

female from 10 miles northeast of Goldendale, Klickitat County, in

the southern Cascades, measured: 1105; 280; 197; weight 19 lbs. A

female from Cashmere, Chelan County, in the northern Cascades,

measured: 1209; 410; 210; 131. A female from the middle fork of the

Nooksack River, Whatcom County, in western Washington, measured:

total length 1185; length of tail 358.

_Distribution._--Suitable areas of the entire state, except for

northeastern Washington.

_Remarks._--Pending a revision of the coyotes, those of western

Washington are referred to _lestes_.

=Canis latrans incolatus= Hall

_Canis latrans incolatus_ Hall, Univ. California Publ. Zoöl.,

40:369, November 5, 1934.

_Type._--Obtained at Isaacs Lake, 3,000 ft. elevation, Bowron Lakes

Region, British Columbia, by T. T. and E. B. McCabe on October 23,

1928; type in Museum of Vertebrate Zoölogy.

_Racial characters._--Similar to _lestes_ but frontal region more

concave.

_Measurements._--A male from 20 miles east of Tonasket, Okanogan

County, measures: total length 1033; length of tail 291; hind foot

163; ear 110.

_Distribution._--Northeastern Washington, west to Okanogan and

Conconully (W. W. D.).

_Remarks._--Several series of coyote skulls from northeastern

Washington are more variable than series of _lestes_ from

California and _incolatus_ from British Columbia. The "dish-faced"

character of _incolatus_ is more strongly represented in some

coyotes from northeastern Washington than in topotypes of

_incolatus_ but others are more like _lestes_. In average

measurements they are nearer _incolatus_.

=Canis lupus fuscus= Richardson

Timber Wolf

_Canis lupus_ var. _fusca_ Richardson, Mammalia, Zoölogy, Captain

Beechey's voyage of the Blossom, p. 5, 1839.

_Lupus gigas_ Townsend, Jour. Acad. Sci. Philadelphia, 2:75,

November, 1850 (type from near Vancouver, Clark County,

Washington).

_Canis gigas_ Miller, Smithsonian Misc. Coll., 59 (no. 15):4, June

8, 1912.

_Canis occidentalis gigas_ Taylor and Shaw, Birds and Mamm. Mt.

Rainier Nat. Park, p. 39, 1927.

_Canis lycaon gigas_ Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 55:272, August 29,

1936.

_Type locality._--Banks of the Columbia below The Dalles in Oregon

or Washington.

_Racial characters._--A large, relatively dark colored wolf with

wide skull and heavy dentition.

_Distribution._--Probably occurred from the eastern base of the

Cascades westward to the Pacific. Now extinct over most of its

range.

[Illustration: FIG. 71. Probable past distribution of the wolf in

Washington. A. _Canis lupus fuscus._ B. _Canis lupus columbianus._ C.

_Canis lupus irremotus._]

_Description._--The wolf is a large carnivore of the general proportions

of a large collie dog. Wolves closely resemble coyotes but are larger,

with stouter body, larger feet, thicker muzzle and more massive,

powerful skull and teeth. The fur of wolves is long and rather stiff.

In general color of the body they resemble coyotes, but the underparts

are less white and the legs and feet are more contrastingly reddish.

Wolves of the species _Canis lupus_ range over the northern parts of

both the Old and New World. In America they are found from the Arctic

south into Mexico.

Wolves occurred in western, northeastern and southeastern Washington.

They seem not to have occurred on the Columbian Plateau. Wolves are

generally associated with the larger, hooved mammals upon which they

feed. In Washington these probably once included the elk, deer, mountain

sheep and mountain goat. Hooved animals, except mountain sheep and deer,

may not have occurred on the Columbian Plateau in historic times, and

even the deer and sheep probably were scarce. There was probably little

food for wolves on the Plateau.

Mammals of Washington, Volume 2 University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History · 第 18 / 36 段