This strange place, upon the south side of Maiden-lane, Covent Garden,

was opened about 1730, and is described as a "Midnight Concert Room,"

in _Adventures Underground_, 1750. Professor Porson was a great lover

of cider, the patronymic drink for which the cellar was once famed; it

became his nightly haunt, for wherever he spent the evening, he

finished the night at the Cider Cellar. One night, in 1795, as he sat

here smoking his pipe, with his friend George Gordon, he abruptly said,

"Friend George, do you think the widow Lunan an agreeable sort of

personage, as times go?" Gordon assented. "In that case," replied

Porson, "you must meet me to-morrow morning at St. Martin's-in-the-Fields,

at eight o'clock;" and without saying more, Porson paid his reckoning,

and went home. Next morning, Gordon repaired to the church, and there

found Porson with Mrs. Lunan and a female friend, and the parson

waiting to begin the ceremony. The service being ended, the bride and

her friend retired by one door of the church, and Porson and Gordon by

another. The bride and bridegroom dined together with friends, but

after dinner Porson contrived to slip away, and passed the rest of the

day with a learned friend, and did not leave till the family were

about to retire for the night, when Porson adjourned to the Cider

Cellar, and there stayed till eight o'clock next morning. One of his

companions here is said to have shouted before Porson, "Dick can beat

us all: he can drink all night and spout all day," which greatly

pleased the Professor.

We remember the place not many years after Porson's death, when it

was, as its name implied, _a cellar_, and the fittings were rude and

rough: over the mantelpiece was a large mezzotint portrait of Porson,

framed and glazed, which we take to be the missing portrait named by

the Rev. Mr. Watson, in his Life of the Professor. The Cider Cellar

was subsequently enlarged; but its exhibitions grew to be too

sensational for long existence.

OFFLEY'S, HENRIETTA-STREET.

This noted tavern, of our day, enjoyed great and deserved celebrity,

though short-lived. It was No. 23, on the south side of

Henrietta-street, Covent Garden, and its fame rested upon Burton ale,

and the largest supper-room in this theatrical neighbourhood; with no

pictures, placards, paper-hangings, or vulgar coffee-room finery, to

disturb one's relish of the good things there provided. Offley, the

proprietor, was originally at Bellamy's, and "as such, was privileged

to watch, and occasionally admitted to assist, the presiding priestess

of the gridiron at the exercise of her mysteries." Offley's chop was

thick and substantial; the House of Commons' chop was small and thin,

and honourable Members sometimes ate a dozen at a sitting. Offley's

chop was served with shalots shred, and warmed in gravy, and

accompanied by nips of Burton ale, and was a delicious after-theatre

supper. The large room at that hour was generally crowded with a

higher class of men than are to be seen in taverns of the present day.

There was excellent dining up-stairs, with wines really worth

drinking--all with a sort of Quakerly plainness, but solid comfort.

The fast men came to the great room, where the _spécialité_ was

singing by amateurs upon one evening of the week; and to prevent the

chorus waking the dead in their cerements in the adjoining churchyard,

the coffee-room window was double. The "professionals" stayed away.

Francis Crew sang Moore's melodies, then in their zenith; sometimes,

in a spirit of waggery, an amateur would sing "Chevy Chase" in full;

and now and then Offley himself trolled out one of Captain Morris's

lyrics. Such was this right joyously convivial place some

five-and-forty years since upon the singing night. Upon other

evenings, there came to a large round table (a sort of privileged

place) a few well-to-do, substantial tradesmen from the neighbourhood,

among whom was the renowned surgical-instrument maker from the Strand,

who had the sagacity to buy the iron from off the piles of old London

Bridge, and convert it (after it had lain for centuries under water)

into some of the finest surgical instruments of the day. Offley's,

however, declined: the singing was discontinued; Time had thinned the

ranks and groups of the bright and buoyant; the large room was mostly

frequented by quiet, orderly persons, who kept good hours; the

theatre-suppers grew few and far between; the merry old host

departed,--when it was proposed to have his portrait painted--but in

vain; success had ebbed away, and at length the house was closed.[39]

Offley's was sketched with a free hand, in _Horæ Offleanæ, Bentley's

Miscellany_, March, 1841.

FOOTNOTE:

[39] Walks and Talks about London, 1865, pp. 180-182.

THE RUMMER TAVERN.

The locality of this noted tavern is given by Cunningham, as "two

doors from Locket's, between Whitehall and Charing Cross, removed to

the water-side of Charing Cross, in 1710, and burnt down Nov. 7th,

1750. It was kept in the reign of Charles II., by Samuel Prior, uncle

of Matthew Prior, the poet, who thus wrote to Fleetwood Shephard:

"My uncle, rest his soul! when living,

Might have contriv'd me ways of thriving:

Taught me with cider to replenish

My vats, or ebbing tide of Rhenish.

So when for hock I drew prickt white-wine,

Swear't had the flavour, and was right wine."

The Rummer is introduced by Hogarth into his picture of "Night." Here

Jack Sheppard committed his first robbery by stealing two silver

spoons.

The Rummer, in Queen-street, was kept by Brawn, a celebrated cook, of

whom Dr. King, in his _Art of Cookery_, speaks in the same way as

Kit-Kat and Locket.

King, also, in his _Analogy between Physicians, Cooks, and

Playwrights_, thus describes a visit:--

"Though I seldom go out of my own lodgings, I was prevailed on the

other day to dine with some friends at the Rummer in Queen-street....

Sam Trusty would needs have me go with him into the kitchen, and see

how matters went there.... He assured me that Mr. Brawn had an art,

etc. I was, indeed, very much pleased and surprised with the

extraordinary splendour and economy I observed there; but above all

with the great readiness and dexterity of the man himself. His motions

were quick, but not precipitate; he in an instant applied himself from

one stove to another, without the least appearance of hurry, and in

the midst of smoke and fire preserved an incredible serenity of

countenance."

Beau Brummel, according to Mr. Jesse, spoke with a relish worthy a

descendant of "the Rummer," of the savoury pies of his aunt Brawn, who

then resided at Kilburn; she is said to have been the widow of a

grandson of the celebrity of Queen-street, who had himself kept the

public-house at the old Mews Gate, at Charing Cross.--See _Notes and

Queries_, 2nd S., no. xxxvi.

We remember an old tavern, "the Rummer," in 1825, which was taken down

with the lower portion of St. Martin's-lane, to form Trafalgar-square.

SPRING GARDEN TAVERNS.

Spring Garden is named from its water-spring or fountain, set playing

by the spectator treading upon its hidden machinery--an eccentricity

of the Elizabethan garden. Spring Garden, by a patent which is extant,

in 1630 was made a bowling-green by command of Charles I. "There was

kept in it an ordinary of six shillings a meal (when the king's

proclamation allows but two elsewhere); continual bibbing and drinking

wine all day under the trees; two or three quarrels every week. It was

grown scandalous and insufferable; besides, my Lord Digby being

reprehended for striking in the king's garden, he said he took it for

a common bowling-place, where all paid money for their coming

in."--_Mr. Garrard to Lord Strafford._

In 1634 Spring Garden was put down by the King's command, and ordered

to be hereafter no common bowling-place. This led to the opening of "a

New Spring Garden" (Shaver's Hall), by a gentleman-barber, a servant

of the lord chamberlain's. The old garden was, however, re-opened; for

13th June, 1649, says Evelyn, "I treated divers ladies of my

relations in Spring Gardens;" but 10th May, 1654, he records that

Cromwell and his partisans had shut up and seized on Spring Gardens,

"w'ch till now had been ye usual rendezvous for the ladys and

gallants at this season."

Spring Garden was, however, once more re-opened; for, in _A Character

of England_, 1659, it is described as "The inclosure not disagreeable,

for the solemnness of the grove, the warbling of the birds, and as it

opens into the spacious walks at St. James's.... It is usual to find

some of the young company here till midnight; and the thickets of the

garden seem to be contrived to all advantages of gallantry, after they

have refreshed with the collation, which is here seldom omitted, at a

certain cabaret in the middle of this paradise, where the forbidden

fruits are certain trifling tarts, neats' tongues, salacious meats,

and bad Rhenish."

"The New Spring Garden" at Lambeth (afterwards Vauxhall) was

flourishing in 1661-3; when the ground at Charing Cross was built

upon, as "Inner Spring Garden" and "Outer Spring Garden."

Buckingham-court is named from the Duke of Buckingham, one of the

rakish frequenters of the Garden; and upon the site of Drummond's

banking-house was "Locket's Ordinary, a house of entertainment much

frequented by gentry," and a relic of the Spring Garden gaiety:

"For Locket's stands where gardens once did spring."

Dr. King's _Art of Cookery_, 1709.

Here the witty and beautiful dramatist, Mrs. Centlivre, died, December

1, 1723, at the house of her third husband, Joseph Centlivre, "Yeoman

of the Mouth" (head cook) "to Queen Anne."[40] In her Prologue to

_Love's Contrivances_, 1703, we have

"At Locket's, Brown's, and at Pontack's enquire

What modish kickshaws the nice beaux desire,

What famed ragouts, what new invented sallad,

Has best pretensions to regain the palate."

Locket's was named from its first landlord:[41] its fame declined in

the reign of Queen Anne, and expired early in the next reign.

FOOTNOTES:

[40] Curiosities of London, pp. 678, 679.

[41] Edward Locket, in 1693, took the Bowling-green House, on Putney

Heath, where all gentlemen might be entertained. In a house built on

the site of the above, died, Jan. 23, 1806, the Rt. Hon. William Pitt.

"HEAVEN" AND "HELL" TAVERNS, WESTMINSTER.

At the north end of Lindsay-lane, upon the site of the Committee-rooms

of the House of Commons, was a tavern called "Heaven;" and under the

old Exchequer Chamber were two subterraneous passages called "Hell"

and "Purgatory." Butler, in _Hudibras_, mentions the first as

"False Heaven at the end of the Hell;"

Gifford, in his notes on Ben Jonson, says: "Heaven and Hell were two

common alehouses, abutting on Westminster Hall. Whalley says that they

were standing in his remembrance. They are mentioned together with a

third house, called Purgatory, in a grant which I have read, dated in

the first year of Henry VII."

Old Fuller quaintly says of Hell: "I could wish it had another name,

seeing it is ill jesting with edged tools. I am informed that formerly

this place was appointed a prison for the King's debtors, who never

were freed thence until they had paid their uttermost due demanded of

them. This proverb is since applied to moneys paid into the Exchequer,

which thence are irrecoverable, upon what plea or pretence whatever."

Peacham describes Hell as a place near Westminster Hall, "where very

good meat is dressed all the term time;" and the Company of Parish

Clerks add, it is "very much frequented by lawyers." According to Ben

Jonson, Hell appears to have been frequented by lawyers' clerks; for,

in his play of the _Alchemist_, Dapper is forbidden

"To break his fast in Heaven or Hell."

Hugh Peters, on his Trial, tells us that he went to Westminster to

find out some company to dinner with him, and having walked about an

hour in Westminster Hall, and meeting none of his friends to dine with

him, he went "to that place called Heaven, and dined there."

When Pride "purged" the Parliament, on Dec. 6, 1648, the forty-one he

excepted were shut up for the night in the Hell tavern, kept by a Mr.

Duke (_Carlyle_); and which Dugdale calls "their great victualling-house

near Westminster Hall, where they kept them all night without any

beds."

Pepys, in his _Diary_, thus notes his visit: "28 Jan. 1659-60. And so

I returned and went to Heaven, where Ludlin and I dined." Six years

later, at the time of the Restoration, four days before the King

landed, in one of these taverns, Pepys spent the evening with Locke

and Purcell, hearing a variety of brave Italian and Spanish songs, and

a new canon of Locke's on the words, "Domine salvum fac Regem." "Here,

out of the windows," he says, "it was a most pleasant sight to see the

City, from one end to the other, with a glory about it, so high was

the light of the bonfires, and thick round the City, and the bells

rang everywhere."

After all, "Hell" may have been so named from its being a prison of

the King's debtors, most probably a very bad one: it was also called

the Constabulary. Its Wardenship was valued yearly at the sum of

11_s._, and Paradise at 4_l._

Purgatory appears also to have been an ancient prison, the keys of

which, attached to a leathern girdle, says Walcot's _Westminster_, are

still preserved. Herein were kept the ducking-stools for scolds, who

were placed in a chair fastened on an iron pivot to the end of a long

pole, which was balanced at the middle upon a high trestle, thus

allowing the culprit's body to be _ducked_ in the Thames.

"BELLAMY'S KITCHEN."

In a pleasantly written book, entitled _A Career in the Commons_, we

find this sketch of the singular apartment, in the vicinity of the

(Old) House of Commons called "the Kitchen." "Mr. Bellamy's beer may

be unexceptionable, and his chops and steaks may be unrivalled, but

the legislators of England delight in eating a dinner in the place

where it is cooked, and in the presence of the very fire where the

beef hisses and the gravy runs! Bellamy's kitchen seems, in fact, a

portion of the British Constitution. A foreigner, be he a Frenchman,

American, or Dutchman, if introduced to the 'kitchen,' would stare

with astonishment if you told him that in this plain apartment, with

its immense fire, meatscreen, gridirons, and a small tub under the

window for washing the glasses, the statesmen of England very often

dine, and men, possessed of wealth untold, and with palaces of their

own, in which luxury and splendour are visible in every part, are

willing to leave their stately dining-halls and powdered attendants,

to be waited upon, while eating a chop in Bellamy's kitchen, by two

unpretending old women. Bellamy's kitchen, I repeat, is part and

parcel of the British Constitution. Baronets who date from the

Conquest, and squires of every degree, care nothing for the unassuming

character of the 'kitchen,' if the steak be hot and good, if it can be

quickly and conveniently dispatched, and the tinkle of the

division-bell can be heard while the dinner proceeds. Call England a

proud nation, forsooth! Say that the House of Commons is aristocratic!

Both the nation and its representatives must be, and are,

unquestionable patterns of republican humility, if all the pomp and

circumstance of dining can be forgotten in Bellamy's kitchen!"[42]

FOOTNOTE:

[42] At the noted Cat and Bagpipes tavern, at the south-west corner of

Downing-street, George Rose used to eat his mutton-chop; he

subsequently became Secretary to the Treasury.

A COFFEE-HOUSE CANARY-BIRD.

Of "a great Coffee-house" in Pall Mall we find the following amusing

story, in the _Correspondence of Gray and Mason_, edited by Mitford:

"In the year 1688, my Lord Peterborough had a great mind to be well

with Lady Sandwich, Mrs. Bonfoy's old friend. There was a woman who

kept a great Coffee-house in Pall Mall, and she had a miraculous

canary-bird that piped twenty tunes. Lady Sandwich was fond of such

things, had heard of and seen the bird. Lord Peterborough came to the

woman, and offered her a large sum of money for it; but she was rich,

and proud of it, and would not part with it for love or money.

However, he watched the bird narrowly, observed all its marks and

features, went and bought just such another, sauntered into the

coffee-room, took his opportunity when no one was by, slipped the

wrong bird into the cage and the right into his pocket, and went off

undiscovered to make my Lady Sandwich happy. This was just about the

time of the Revolution; and, a good while after, going into the same

coffee-house again, he saw his bird there, and said, 'Well, I reckon

you would give your ears now that you had taken my money.' 'Money!'

says the woman, 'no, nor ten times that money now, dear little

creature! for, if your lordship will believe me (as I am a Christian,

it is true), it has moped and moped, and never once opened its pretty

lips since the day that the poor king went away!"

STAR AND GARTER, PALL MALL. FATAL DUEL.

Pall Mall has long been noted for its taverns, as well as for its

chocolate- and coffee-houses, and "houses for clubbing." They were

resorted to by gay nobility and men of estate; and, in times when

gaming and drinking were indulged in to frightful excess, these

taverns often proved hot-beds of quarrel and fray. One of the most

sanguinary duels on record--that between the Duke of Hamilton and Lord

Mohun--was planned at the Queen's Arms, in Pall Mall, and the Rose in

Covent Garden; at the former, Lord Mohun supped with his second on the

two nights preceding the fatal conflict in Hyde Park.

Still more closely associated with Pall Mall was the fatal duel

between Lord Byron and Mr. Chaworth, which was _fought in a room_ of

the Star and Garter, when the grand-uncle of the poet Lord killed in a

duel, or rather scuffle, his relation and neighbour, "who was run

through the body, and died next day." The duellists were neighbours in

the country, and were members of the Nottinghamshire Club, which met

at the Star and Garter once a month.

The meeting at which arose the unfortunate dispute that produced the

duel, was on the 26th of January, 1765, when were present Mr. John

Hewet, who sat as chairman; the Hon. Thomas Willoughby; Frederick

Montagu, John Sherwin, Francis Molyneux, Esqrs., and Lord Byron;

William Chaworth, George Donston, and Charles Mellish, junior, Esq.;

and Sir Robert Burdett; who were all the company. The usual hour of

dining was soon after four, and the rule of the Club was to have the

bill and a bottle brought in at seven. Till this hour all was jollity

and good-humour; but Mr. Hewet, happening to start some conversation

about the best method of preserving game, setting the laws for that

purpose out of the question, Mr. Chaworth and Lord Byron were of

different opinions; Mr. Chaworth insisting on severity against

poachers and unqualified persons; and Lord Byron declaring that the

way to have most game was to take no care of it at all. Mr. Chaworth,

in confirmation of what he had said, insisted that Sir Charles Sedley

and himself had more game on five acres than Lord Byron had on all his

manors. Lord Byron, in reply, proposed a bet of 100 guineas, but this

was not laid. Mr. Chaworth then said, that were it not for Sir Charles

Sedley's care, and his own, Lord Byron would not have a hare on his

estate; and his Lordship asking with a smile, what Sir Charles

Sedley's manors were, was answered by Mr. Chaworth,--Nuttall and

Bulwell. Lord Byron did not dispute Nuttall, but added, Bulwell was

his; on which Mr. Chaworth, with some heat, replied: "If you want

information as to Sir Charles Sedley's manors, he lives at Mr.

Cooper's, in Dean Street, and, I doubt not, will be ready to give you

satisfaction; and, as to myself, your Lordship knows where to find me,

in Berkeley Row."

The subject was now dropped; and little was said, when Mr. Chaworth

called to settle the reckoning, in doing which the master of the

tavern observed him to be flurried. In a few minutes, Mr. Chaworth

having paid the bill, went out, and was followed by Mr. Donston, whom

Mr. C. asked if he thought he had been short in what he had said; to

which Mr. D. replied, "No; he had gone rather too far upon so trifling

an occasion, but did not believe that Lord Byron or the company would

think any more of it." Mr. Donston then returned to the club-room.

Lord Byron now came out, and found Mr. Chaworth still on the stairs:

it is doubtful whether his Lordship called upon Mr. Chaworth, or Mr.

Chaworth called upon Lord Byron; but both went down to the first

landing-place--having dined upon the second floor--and both called a

waiter to show an empty room, which the waiter did, having first

opened the door, and placed a small tallow-candle, which he had in his

hand, on the table; he then retired, when the gentlemen entered, and

shut the door after them.

In a few minutes the affair was decided: the bell was rung, but by

whom is uncertain: the waiter went up, and perceiving what had

happened, ran down very frightened, told his master of the

catastrophe, when he ran up to the room, and found the two antagonists

standing close together: Mr. Chaworth had his sword in his left hand,

and Lord Byron his sword in his right; Lord Byron's left hand was

round Mr. Chaworth, and Mr. Chaworth's right hand was round Lord

Byron's neck, and over his shoulder. Mr. C. desired Mr. Fynmore, the

landlord, to take his sword, and Lord B. delivered up his sword at the

same moment: a surgeon was sent for, and came immediately. In the

meantime, six of the company entered the room; when Mr. Chaworth said

that "he could not live many hours; that he forgave Lord Byron, and

hoped the world would; that the affair had passed in the dark, only a

small tallow-candle burning in the room; that Lord Byron asked him, if

he addressed the observation on the game to Sir Charles Sedley, or to

him?--to which he replied, 'If you have anything to say, we had better

shut the door;' that while he was doing this, Lord Byron bid him draw,

and in turning he saw his Lordship's sword half-drawn, on which he

whipped out his own sword and made the first pass; that the sword

being through my Lord's waistcoat, he thought that he had killed him;

and, asking whether he was not mortally wounded, Lord Byron, while he

was speaking, shortened his sword, and stabbed him in the belly."

When Mr. Mawkins, the surgeon, arrived, he found Mr. Chaworth sitting

by the fire, with the lower part of his waistcoat open, his shirt

bloody, and his hand upon his belly. He inquired if he was in

immediate danger, and being answered in the affirmative, he desired

his uncle, Mr. Levinz, might be sent for. In the meantime, he stated

to Mr. Hawkins, that Lord Byron and he (Mr. Chaworth) entered the room

together; that his Lordship said something of the dispute, on which

he, Mr. C., fastened the door, and turning round, perceived his

Lordship with his sword either drawn or nearly so; on which he

instantly drew his own and made a thrust at him, which he thought had

wounded or killed him; that then perceiving his Lordship shorten his

sword to return the thrust, he thought to have parried it with his

left hand, at which he looked twice, imagining that he had cut it in

the attempt; that he felt the sword enter his body, and go deep

through his back; that he struggled, and being the stronger man,

disarmed his Lordship, and expressed his apprehension that he had

mortally wounded him; that Lord Byron replied by saying something to

the like effect; adding that he hoped now he would allow him to be as

brave a man as any in the kingdom.

After a little while, Mr. Chaworth seemed to grow stronger, and was

removed to his own house: additional medical advice arrived, but no

relief could be given him: he continued sensible till his death. Mr.

Levinz, his uncle, now arrived with an attorney, to whom Mr. Chaworth

gave very sensible and distinct instructions for making his will. The

will was then executed, and the attorney, Mr. Partington, committed to

writing the last words Mr. Chaworth was heard to say. This writing was

handed to Mr. Levinz, and gave rise to a report that a paper was

written by the deceased, and sealed up, not to be opened till the time

that Lord Byron should be tried; but no paper was written by Mr.

Chaworth, and that written by Mr. Partington was as follows: "Sunday

morning, the 27th of January, about three of the clock, Mr. Chaworth

said, that my Lord's sword was half-drawn, and that he, knowing the

man, immediately, or as quick as he could, whipped out his sword, and

had the first thrust; that then my Lord wounded him, and he disarmed

my Lord, who then said, 'By G--, I have as much courage as any man in

England.'"

Club Life of London, Vol. 2 (of 2) With Anecdotes of the Clubs, Coffee-Houses and Taverns of the Metropolis During the 17th, 18th, and 19th Centuries · 第 13 / 20 段