THE THREE TRIBUNALS

'But with me it is a very small thing that I should be

judged of you, or of man's judgment: yea, I judge not

mine own self. 4. For I know nothing by myself; yet am

I not hereby justified; but he that judgeth me is the

Lord.'--1 COR. iv. 3, 4.

The Church at Corinth was honeycombed by the characteristic Greek

vice of party spirit. The three great teachers, Paul, Peter, Apollos,

were pitted against each other, and each was unduly exalted by those

who swore by him, and unduly depreciated by the other two factions.

But the men whose names were the war-cries of these sections were

themselves knit in closest friendship, and felt themselves to be

servants in common of one Master, and fellow-workers in one task.

So Paul, in the immediate context, associating Peter and Apollos with

himself, bids the Corinthians think of '_us_' as being servants

of Christ, and not therefore responsible to men; and as stewards of

the mysteries of God, that is, dispensers of truths long hidden but

now revealed, and as therefore accountable for correct accounts and

faithful dispensation only to the Lord of the household. Being

responsible to Him, they heeded very little what others thought about

them. Being responsible to Him, they could not accept vindication

by their own consciences as being final. There was a judgment beyond

these.

So here we have three tribunals--that of man's estimates, that of our

own consciences, that of Jesus Christ. An appeal lies from the first

to the second, and from the second to the third. It is base to depend

on men's judgments; it is well to attend to the decisions of

conscience, but it is not well to take it for granted that, if

conscience approve, we are absolved. The court of final appeal is

Jesus Christ, and what He thinks about each of us. So let us look

briefly at these three tribunals.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Romans Corinthians (To II Corinthians, Chap. V) · 第 240 / 301 题