II. Be sure that, if there is to be enmity, it is all on one side.

'As much as in you lieth, be at peace with all.' These words are, I

think, unduly limited when they are supposed to imply that there are

circumstances in which a Christian has a right to be at strife. As if

they meant: Be peaceable as far as you can; but if it be impossible,

then quarrel. The real meaning goes far deeper than that. 'It takes

two to make a quarrel,' says the old proverb; it takes two to make

peace also, does it not? We cannot determine whether our relations

with men will be peaceful or no; we are only answerable for our part,

and for that we are answerable. 'As much as lieth in you' is the

explanation of 'if it be possible.' Your part is to be at peace; it

is not your part up to a certain point and no further, but always,

and in all circumstances, it is your part. It may not be possible to

be at peace with all men; there may be some who _will_ quarrel with

you. You are not to blame for that, but their part and yours are

separate, and your part is the same whatever they do. Be you at peace

with all men whether they are at peace with you or not. Don't you

quarrel with them even if they will quarrel with you. That seems to

me to be plainly the meaning of the words. It would be contrary to

the tenor of the context and the teaching of the New Testament to

suppose that here we had that favourite principle, 'There is a point

beyond which forbearance cannot go,' where it becomes right to

cherish hostile sentiments or to try to injure a man. If there be such

a point, it is very remarkable that there is no attempt made in the

New Testament to define it. The nearest approach to such definition

is 'till seventy times seven,' the two perfect numbers multiplied

into themselves. So I think that this injunction absolutely

prescribes persistent, patient peacefulness, and absolutely

proscribes our taking up the position of antagonism, and under no

circumstances meeting hate with hate. It does not follow that there

is never to be opposition. It may be necessary for the good of the

opponent himself, and for the good of society, that he should be

hindered in his actions of hostility, but there is never to be

bitterness; and we must take care that none of the devil's leaven

mingles with our zeal against evil.

There is no need for enlarging on the enormous difficulty of carrying

out such a commandment in our daily lives. We all know too well how

hard it is; but we may reflect for a moment on the absolute necessity

of obeying this precept to the full. For their own souls' sakes

Christian men are to avoid all bitterness, strife, and malice. Let us

try to remember, and to bring to bear on our daily lives, the solemn

things which Jesus said about God's forgiveness being measured by our

forgiveness. The faithful, even though imperfect, following of this

exhortation would revolutionise our lives. Nothing that we can only

win by fighting with our fellows is worth fighting for. Men will

weary of antagonism which is met only by the imperturbable calm of a

heart at peace with God, and seeking peace with all men. The hot fire

of hatred dies down, like burning coals scattered on a glacier, when

laid against the crystal coldness of a patient, peaceful spirit.

Watch-dogs in farmhouses will bark half the night through because

they hear another barking a mile off. It takes two to make a quarrel;

let me be sure that I am never one of the two!

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Romans Corinthians (To II Corinthians, Chap. V) · 第 161 / 301 题