I. First, then, the text tells us, no inheritance without sonship.

In general terms, spiritual blessings can only be given to those who

are in a certain spiritual condition. Always and necessarily the

capacity or organ of reception precedes and determines the bestowment

of blessings. The light falls everywhere, but only the eye drinks it

in. The lower orders of creatures are shut out from all participation

in the gifts which belong to the higher forms of life, simply because

they are so made and organised as that these cannot find entrance

into their nature. They are, as it were, walled up all round; and the

only door they have to communicate with the outer world is the door

of sense. Man has higher gifts simply because he has higher

capacities. All creatures are plunged in the same boundless ocean of

divine beneficence and bestowment, and into each there flows just

that, and no more, which each, by the make and constitution that God

has given it, is capable of receiving. In the man there are more

windows and doors opened out than in the animal He is capable of

receiving intellectual impulses, spiritual emotions; he can think,

and feel, and desire, and will, and resolve: and so he stands on a

higher level than the beast below him.

Not otherwise is it in regard to God's kingdom, 'which is

righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.' The gift and

blessing of salvation is primarily a spiritual gift, and only

involves outward consequences secondarily and subordinately. It

mainly consists in the heart being at peace with God, in the whole

soul being filled with divine affections, in the weight and bondage

of transgression being taken away, and substituted by the impulse and

the life of the new love. Therefore, neither God can give, nor man

can receive, that gift upon any other terms, than just this, that the

heart and nature be fitted and adapted for it. Spiritual blessings

require a spiritual capacity for the reception of them; or, as my

text says, you cannot have the inheritance unless you are sons. If

salvation consisted simply in a change of place; if it were merely

that by some expedient or arrangement, an outward penalty, which was

to fall or not to fall at the will of an arbitrary judge, were

prevented from coming down, why then, it would be open to Him who

held the power of letting the sword fall, to decide on what terms He

might choose to suspend its infliction. But inasmuch as God's

deliverance is not a deliverance from a mere arbitrary and outward

punishment: inasmuch as God's salvation, though it be deliverance

from the penalty as well as from the guilt of sin, is by no means

chiefly a deliverance from outward consequences, but mainly a

removal of the nature and disposition that makes these outward

consequences certain,--therefore a man cannot be saved, God's love

cannot save him, God's justice will not save him, God's power stands

back from saving him, upon any other condition than this that his

soul shall be adapted and prepared for the reception and enjoyment of

the blessing of a spiritual salvation.

But the inheritance which my text speaks about is also that which a

Christian hopes to receive and enter upon in heaven. The same

principle precisely applies there. There is no inheritance of heaven

without sonship; because all the blessings of that future life are of

a spiritual character. The joy and the rapture and the glory of that

higher and better life have, of course, connected with them certain

changes of bodily form, certain changes of local dwelling, certain

changes which could perhaps be granted equally to a man, of whatever

sort he was. But, friends, it is not the golden harps, not the

pavement of 'glass mingled with fire,' not the cessation from work,

not the still composure, and changeless indwelling, not the society

even, that makes the heaven of heaven. All these are but the

embodiments and rendering visible of the inward facts, a soul at

peace with God in the depths of its being, an eye which gazes upon

the Father, and a heart which wraps itself in His arms. Heaven is no

heaven except in so far as it is the possession of God. That saying

of the Psalmist is not an exaggeration, nor even a forgetting of the

other elements of future blessedness, but it is a simple statement of

the literal fact of the case, 'I have none in heaven but Thee!' God

is the heritage of His people. To dwell in His love, and to be filled

with His light, and to walk for ever in the glory of His

sunlit face, to do His will, and to bear His character stamped upon

our foreheads--_that_ is the glory and the perfectness to which

we are aspiring. Do not then rest in the symbols that show us, darkly

and far off, what that future glory is. Do not forget that the

picture is a shadow. Get beneath all these figurative expressions,

and feel that whilst it may be true that for us in our present

earthly state, there can be no higher, no purer, no more spiritual

nor any truer representations of the blessedness which is to come,

than those which couch it in the forms of earthly experience, and

appeal to sense as the minister of delight--yet that all these things

are representations, and not adequate presentations. The inheritance

of the servants of the Lord is the Lord Himself, and they dwell in

Him, and _there_ is their joy.

Well then, if that be even partially true--admitting all that you may

say about circumstances which go to make some portion of the

blessedness of that future life--if it be true that God is the true

blessing given by His Gospel upon earth, that He Himself is the

greatest gift that can be bestowed, and that He is the true Heaven of

heaven--what a flood of light does it cast upon that statement of my

text, 'If children, then heirs'; no inheritance without sonship! For

who can possess God but they who love Him? who can love, but they who

know His love? who can have Him working in their hearts a blessed and

sanctifying change, except the souls that lie thankfully quiet

beneath the forming touch of His invisible hand, and like flowers

drink in the light of His face in their still joy? How can God dwell

in any heart except a heart which has in it a love of purity? Where

can He make His temple except in the 'upright heart and pure'? How

can there be fellowship betwixt Him and any one except the man who is

a son because he hath received of the divine nature, and in whom that

divine nature is growing up into a divine likeness? 'What fellowship

hath Christ with Belial?' is not only applicable as a guide for our

practical life, but points to the principle on which God's

inheritance belongs to God's sons alone. 'Blessed are the pure in

heart, for they shall see God'; and those only who love, and are

children, to them alone does the Father come and does the Father

belong.

So much, then, for the first principle: No inheritance without

sonship.

II. Secondly, the text leads us to the principle that there is no

sonship without a spiritual birth.

The Apostle John in that most wonderful preface to his Gospel, where

all deepest truths concerning the Eternal Being in itself and in the

solemn march of His progressive revelations to the world are set

forth in language simple like the words of a child and inexhaustible

like the voice of a god, draws a broad distinction between the

relation to the manifestations of God which every human soul by

virtue of his humanity sustains, and that into which some, by virtue

of their faith, enter. Every man is lighted by the true light because

he is a man. They who believe in His name receive from Him the

prerogative to become the sons of God. Whatever else may be taught in

John's words, surely they do teach us this, that the sonship of which

he speaks does not belong to man as man, is not a relation into which

we are born by natural birth, that we _become_ sons after we

_are_ men, that those who become sons do not include all those

who are lighted by the Light, but consist of so many of that greater

number as receive Him, and that such become sons by a divine act, the

communication of a spiritual life, whereby they are born of God.

The same Apostle, in his Epistles, where the widest love is conjoined

with the most firmly drawn lines of moral demarcation between the

great opposites--life, light, love--death, darkness, hate--contrasts

in the most unmistakable antithesis the sons of God who are known for

such because they do righteousness, and the world which knew not

Christ, nor knows those who, dimly beholding, partially resemble Him.

Nay, he goes further, and says in strange contradiction to the

popular estimate of his character, but in true imitation of that

Incarnate love which hated iniquity, 'In this the children of God are

manifested and the children of the devil'--echoing thus the words of

Him whose pitying tenderness had sometimes to clothe itself in

sharpest words, even as His hand of powerful love had once to grasp

the scourge of small cords. 'If God were your Father, ye would love

Me: ye are of your father, the devil.'

These are but specimens of a whole cycle of Scripture statements

which in every form of necessary implication, and of direct

statement, set forth the principle that he who is born again of the

Spirit, and he only, is a son of God.

Nothing in all this contradicts the belief that all men are the

children of God, inasmuch as they are shaped by His divine hand and

He has breathed into their nostrils the breath of life. They who hold

that sonship is obtained on the condition which these passages seem

to assert, do also rejoice to believe and to preach that the Father's

love broods over every human heart as the dovelike Spirit over the

primeval chaos. They rejoice to proclaim that Christ has come that

all, that each, may receive the adoption of sons. They do not feel

that their message to, nor their hope for, the world is less blessed,

less wide, because while they call on all to come and take the things

that are freely given to them of God, they believe that those only

who do come and take possess the blessing. Every man may become a son

and heir of God by faith in Jesus Christ.

But notwithstanding all the mercies that belong to us all,

notwithstanding the divine beneficence, which, like the air and the

light, pervades all nature, and underlies all our lives,

notwithstanding the universal adaptation and intention of Christ's

work, notwithstanding the wooing of His tender voice and the

unceasing beckoning of His love, it still remains true that there are

men in the world, created by God, loved and cared for by Him, for

whom Christ died, who might be, but are not, sons of God.

Fatherhood! what does that word itself teach us? It speaks of the

communication of a life, and the reciprocity of love. It rests upon a

divine act, and it involves a human emotion. It involves that the

father and the child shall have kindred life--the father bestowing

and the child possessing a life which is derived; and because

derived, kindred; and because kindred, unfolding itself in likeness

to the father that gave it. And it requires that between the father's

heart and the child's heart there shall pass, in blessed interchange

and quick correspondence, answering love, flashing backwards and

forwards, like the lightning that touches the earth and rises from it

again. A simple appeal to your own consciousness will decide if that

be the condition of all men. Are you, my brother, conscious of

anything within you higher than the common life that belongs to you

because you are an immortal soul? Can you say, 'From God's hand I have

received the granting and implantation of a new and better life?' Is

your claim verified by this, that you are kindred with God in holy

affections, in like purposes, loving what He loves, hating what He

hates, doing what He wills, accepting what He sends, longing for

Himself, and blessed in His presence? Is your sonship proved by the

depth and sincerity, the simplicity and power, of your throbbing

heart of love to your Father in heaven? Or are all these emotions

empty words to you, things that are spoken in pulpits, but to which

you have nothing in your life corresponding? Oh then, my friend, what

am I to say to you? What but this? no sonship except by that

spiritual birth; and if not such sonship, then the spirit of bondage.

If not such sonship, why then, by all the tendencies of your nature,

and by all the affinities of your moral being, if you are not holding

of heaven, you are holding of hell; if you are not drawing your life,

your character, your emotions, your affections, from the sacred well

that lies up yonder, you are drawing them from the black one that

lies down there. There are heaven, hell, and the earth that lies

between, ever influenced either from above or from below. You are

sons because born again, or slaves and 'enemies by wicked works.' It

is a grim alternative, but it is a fact.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Romans Corinthians (To II Corinthians, Chap. V) · 第 107 / 301 题