I. So, first, look at the two Queens who rule over human life.

Sin and Grace are both personified; and they are both conceived of as

female figures, and both as exercising dominion. They stand face to

face, and each recognises as her enemy the other. The one has

established her dominion: 'Sin _hath_ reigned.' The other is

fighting to establish hers: 'That Grace _might_ reign.' And the

struggle is going on between them, not only on the wide field of the

world; but in the narrow lists of the heart of each of us.

Sin reigns. The truths that underlie that solemn picture are plain

enough, however unwelcome they may be to some of us, and however

remote from the construction of the universe which many of us are

disposed to take.

Now, let us understand our terms. Suppose a man commits a theft. You

may describe it from three different points of view. He has thereby

broken the law of the land; and when we are thinking about that we

call it crime. He has also broken the law of 'morality,' as we call

it; and when we are looking at his deed from that point of view, we

call it vice. Is that all? He has broken something else. He has

broken the law of God; and when we look at it from that point of view

we call it sin. Now, there are a great many things which are sins

that are not crimes; and, with due limitations, I might venture to

say that there are some things which are sins that are not to be

qualified as vices. Sin implies God. The Psalmist was quite right

when he said; 'Against Thee, Thee only have I sinned'; although he

was confessing a foul injury he had done to Bathsheba, and a glaring

crime that he had committed against Uriah. It was as to God, and in

reference to Him only, that his crime and his vice darkened and

solidified into sin.

And what is it, in our actions or in ourselves considered in

reference to God, that makes our actions sins and ourselves sinners?

Remember the prodigal son. 'Father! Give me the portion of goods that

falleth to me.' There you have it all. He went away, and 'wasted his

substance in riotous living.' To claim myself for my own; to act

independently of, or contrary to, the will of God; to try to shake

myself clear of Him; to have nothing to do with Him, even though it

be by mere forgetfulness and negligence, and, in all my ways to

comport myself as if I had no relations of dependence on and

submission to him--that is sin. And there may be that oblivion or

rebellion, not only in the gross vulgar acts which the law calls

crimes, or in those which conscience declares to be vices, but also

in many things which, looked at from a lower point of view, may be

fair and pure and noble. If there is this assertion of self in them,

or oblivion of God and His will in them, I know not how we are to

escape the conclusion that even these fall under the class of sins.

For there can be no act or thought, truly worthy of a man, situated

and circumstanced as we are, which has not, for the very core and

animating motive of it, a reference to God.

Now, when I come and say, as my Bible teaches me to say, that this is

the deepest view of the state of humanity that sin reigns, I do not

wish to fall into the exaggerations by which sometimes that statement

has been darkened and discredited; but I do want to press upon you,

dear brethren, this, as a matter of _personal_ experience, that

wherever there is a heart that loves, and leaves God out, and

wherever there is a will that resolves, determines, impels to action,

and does not bow itself before Him, and wherever there are hands that

labour, or feet that run, at tasks and in paths self-chosen and

unconsecrated by reference to our Father in heaven, no matter how

great and beautiful subsidiary lustres may light up their deeds, the

very heart of them all is transgression of the law of God. For this,

and nothing else or less, is His law: 'Thou shalt love the Lord thy

God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy

strength, and with all thy mind.' I do not charge you with crimes.

You know how far it would be right to charge you with vices. _I_

do not charge you with anything; but I pray you to come with me and

confess: 'We all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.'

I suppose I need not dwell upon the difficulty of getting a lodgment

for this conviction in men's hearts. There is no sadder, and no more

conclusive proof, of the tremendous power of sin over us, than that

it has lulled us into unconsciousness, hard to be broken, of its own

presence and existence. You remember the old stories--I suppose there

is no truth in them, but they will do for an illustration--about some

kind of a blood-sucking animal that perched upon a sleeping man, and

with its leathern wings fanned him into deeper drowsiness whilst it

drew from him his life-blood. That is what this hideous Queen does

for men. She robes herself in a dark cloud, and sends out her behests

from obscurity. And men fancy that they are free whilst all the while

they are her servants. Oh, dear brethren! you may call this theology,

but it is a simple statement of the facts of our condition. 'Sin hath

reigned.'

And now turn to the other picture, 'Grace might reign.' Then there is

an antagonistic power that rises up to confront the widespread

dominion of this anarch of old. And this Queen comes with twenty

thousand to war against her that has but ten thousand on her side.

Again I say, let us understand our terms. I suppose, there are few of

the keywords of the New Testament which have lost more of their

radiance, like quicksilver, by exposure in the air during the

centuries than that great word Grace, which is always on the lips of

this Apostle, and to him had music in its sound, and which to us is a

piece of dead doctrine, associated with certain high Calvinistic

theories which we enlightened people have long ago grown beyond, and

got rid of. Perhaps Paul was more right than we when his heart leaped

up within him at the very thought of all which he saw to lie

palpitating and throbbing with eager desire to bless men, in that

great word. What does he mean by it? Let me put it into the shortest

possible terms. This antagonist Queen is nothing but the love of God

raying out for ever to us inferior creatures, who, by reason of our

sinfulness, have deserved something widely different. Sin stands

there, a hideous hag, though a queen; Grace stands here, 'in all her

gestures dignity and love,' fair and self-communicative, though a

sovereign. The love of God in exercise to sinful men: that is what

the New Testament means by grace. And is it not a great thought?

Notice, for further elucidation of the Apostle's conception, how he

sacrifices the verbal correctness of his antithesis in order to get

to the real opposition. What is the opposite of Sin? Righteousness.

Why does he not say, then, that 'as Sin hath reigned unto death, even

so might Righteousness reign unto life'? Why? Because it is not man,

or anything in man, that can be the true antagonist of, and victor

over, the regnant Sin of humanity; but God Himself comes into the

field, and only He is the foe that Sin dreads. That is to say, the

only hope for a sin-tyrannised world is in the out-throb of the love

of the great heart of God. For, notice the weapon with which He

fights man's transgression, if I may vary the figure for a moment. It

is only subordinately punishment, or law, or threatening, or the

revelation of the wickedness of the transgression. All these have

their places, but they are secondary places. The thing that will

conquer a world's wickedness is nothing else but the manifested love

of God. Only the patient shining down of the sun will ever melt the

icebergs that float in all our hearts. And wonderful and blessed it

is to think that, in whatsoever aspects man's sin may have been an

interruption and a contradiction of the divine purpose, out of the

evil has come a good; that the more obdurate and universal the

rebellion, the more has it evoked a deeper and more wondrous

tenderness. The blacker the thundercloud, the brighter glows the

rainbow that is flung across it. So these two front each other, the

one settled in her established throne--

'Fierce as ten furies, terrible as hell--'

the other coming on her adventurous errand to conquer the world to

herself, and to banish the foul tyranny under which men groan. 'Sin

hath reigned.' Grace is on her way to her dominion.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Romans Corinthians (To II Corinthians, Chap. V) · 第 94 / 301 题