IV. Lastly, we are debtors by injuries inflicted.

Many subject-races seem destined to fade away by contact with our

race; and if we think of the nameless cruelties, and the iliad of

woes which England's possession of this great Colonial Empire has had

accompanying it, we may feel that the harm in many aspects outweighs

the good, and that it had been better for these men to be left

suckled in creeds outworn, and ignorant of our civilisation, than to

receive from us the fatal gifts that they often have received. I do

not wish to exaggerate, but if you will take the facts of the case as

brought out by people that have no Christian prejudices to serve, I

think you will acknowledge that we as a nation owe a debt of

reparation to the barbarians and the unwise.

What about killing African tribes by the thousand with the vile stuff

that we call rum, and send to them in exchange for their poor

commodities? What about introducing new diseases, the offspring of

vice, into the South Sea Islands, decimating and all but destroying

the population? Is it not true that, as the prophet wailed of old

about a degenerate Israel, we may wail about the beach-combers and

other loafers that go amongst savage lands from England--'Through you

the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles.' A Hindoo once said

to a missionary, 'Your Book is very good. If you were as good as your

Book you would conquer India in five years.' That may be true or it

may not, but it gives us the impression that is produced by godless

Englishmen on heathen peoples. We are taking away their religion from

them, necessarily, as the result of education and contact with

European thought. And if we do not substitute for it the one faith

that elevates and saves, the last state of that man will be worse

than the first.

We can almost hear the rattle of the guns on the north-west frontier

of India to-day. There is another specimen of the injuries inflicted.

This is not the place to talk politics, but I feel that this is the

place to ask this question, 'Are Christian principles to have

anything to do in determining national actions?' Is it Christian to

impose our yoke on unwilling tribes who have as deep a love for

independence as the proudest Englishmen of us all, and as good a

right to it? Are punitive expeditions and Maxim guns instalments of

our debt to all men? I wonder what Jesus Christ, who died for Afridis

and Orakzais and all the rest of them, thinks about such conduct?

Brethren, we are debtors to all men. Let us do our best to influence

national action in accordance with the brotherhood which has been

revealed to us by the Elder Brother of us all; and let us, at least

for our own parts, recognise, and, as much as in us is, discharge the

debt which, by our common humanity, and by our possession of the

universal Gospel we owe to all men, and which is made more weighty by

the benefits we receive from many, and by the injuries which England

has inflicted on not a few. Else shall we hear rise above all the

voices that palliate crime, on the plea of 'State necessity,' the

stern words of the Master, 'In thy skirts is found the blood of the

souls of poor innocents.' We are debtors; let us pay our debts.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Romans Corinthians (To II Corinthians, Chap. V) · 第 63 / 301 题