[82] In a remarkable article, the _Novoe Vremya_ makes known the

Russian discovery of “a new British intrigue.” It appears that Great

Britain, not content with the virtual annexation of Egypt and the

Sudan, is even, while carrying out her plans for the absorption of

the Transvaal and the advancement of her interests in Persia, busily

engaged in setting up a Mohammedan Power which is to rival that of

the Sultan, and is ultimately to be used as a means of menacing, if

not destroying, Russian authority in Central Asia. The puppet Prince

selected for this purpose is the Sherif of Mecca. According to the

_Novoe Vremya_, the Sherif has recently received from England a

letter stating that the British government, having decided to invest

a certain worthy but impecunious Mohammedan Sheikh with the Caliphate

of Zeila, on the borders of Somaliland, and recognizing the Sherif as

a descendant of the Prophet and great protector of Islam, considers

it desirable for the Sherif on the day of the appointment of the new

Caliph to issue a manifesto expressing his approval. In return for

this service, Great Britain will proclaim Mecca and Medina the private

property of the Sherif, will assure to him the greater part of the

revenues of the new Caliphate, and will defend him by diplomatic means,

or even by force of arms, against the interference of the Sultan or

any other Foreign Power. It is perhaps needless to say that the author

of this intrigue is said to be Mr. Chamberlain, who is described as

a man “without faith, without truth, capable of trampling under foot

every commandment, whether of God or man, in order to accomplish his

purpose of placing Great Britain at the head of the Powers of the

world.”—_Times_ of India, 1899.

[83] He speaks of it as follows in his Histoire des Langues Semitques,

p. 342 “Cette langue, auparavant inconnue, se montre à nous

soudainement dans toute sa perfection, avec sa flexibilite, sa richesse

infinie, tellemen-complete, en un mot, que depnis ce temps jusqu’a nos

jours elle n’a subi ancune modification importante. Il n’y a pour elle

ni enfance, ni vieillesse; une fois qu’on a signalé son apparition et

ses prodijieuses cont quêtes, tout est dit sur son compte. Je ne sais

si l’on trouverait un autre exemple d’un idiome entrant dans le monde

comme celui-ci, sans état archaïque, sans degrés intermediaires ni

tatonnements.”

[84] Von Kremer, Guidi, Hommel.

[85] Sayce, Sprenger, Schrader, De Goeje, Wright.

[86] Assyrian Grammar, p. 13.

[87] An account of this language or dialect was given by Surgeon H. J.

Carter in Journal Roy. Asiat. Soc., July, 1847.

[88] Lansing.

[89] Found in the _Edinburgh Review_ for July, 1866, article “Mohammed.”

[90] “It would take a long list to exhaust the religious, literary and

scientific contributions to the Arabic language from the missionaries

in Syria. They include the translation of the Scriptures and the

stereotyping of the same in numerous styles; the preparation of a

Scripture guide, commentaries, a concordance, and a complete hymn and

tune book; text-books in history, algebra, geometry, trigonometry,

logarithms, astronomy, meteorology, botany, zoölogy, physics,

chemistry, anatomy, physiology, hygiene, materia medica, practice of

physic, surgery, and a periodical literature which has proved the

stimulus to a very extensive native journalism. The Protestant converts

of the mission, educated by the missionaries, have written elaborate

works on history, poetry, grammar, arithmetic, natural science, and

the standard dictionary of the language, and a cyclopædia which will

make a library by itself, consisting of about twenty volumes of from

six hundred to eight hundred pages each.”—_Dr. G. E. Post, in New York

Evangelist_.

[91] Gen. xxv. 16.

[92] In the _Edinburgh Review_, July, 1866.

[93] International Routes of Asia, by Elisée Reclus, in New York

_Independent_, May 4, 1899.

[94] Smith’s Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia, pp. 9, 17, 131.

[95] What the boys and girls of the towns can study we have described

in our chapter on Mecca.

[96] This is the testimony of Burckhardt and Doughty.

[97] Arabia Deserta, Vol. I., p. 238.

[98] Translation from Mekka, Vol. II., p. 187.

[99] See Burckhardt’s book for further particulars.

[100] Signifying “Allah.”

[101] Baidhawi’s Commentary _in loco_.

[102] For on account of these ancient superstitions and idolatries

still practiced, see W. Robertson Smith’s “Religion of the Semites”

and his “Kinship and marriage in Early Arabia.” The mass of purely

Mohammedan superstition can be studied in books like the Arabian Nights

and Lane’s “Modern Egyptians.”

[103] This chapter is an enlargement of a paper on “The

Star-Worshippers of Mesopotamia” read before the Victoria Institute,

Adelphi Terrace, London, 1897.

[104] Kessler.

[105] Surah ii. 59; v. 73; xxii. 17

[106] According to Gesenius, Sabeans should be _Tsabians_ from

_tsabaoth_, the “host of heaven.” Nöldeke and others say it comes from

a root _subba_ to wash, baptise, and refers to the manner of their

worship. Gibbon is perhaps correct when, on the authority of Pocock,

Hettinger, and D’Herbelot, he states the origin of their other name

thus: “A slight infusion of the gospel had transformed the last remnant

of the Chaldean polytheists into the Christians of St. John at Bussora.”

In regard to their name _Sabeans_, Lane’s Arabic dictionary says that

it comes from a root meaning “one who has departed from one religion

to another religion.” The Arabs used to call the prophet _as-Sabi_,

because he departed from the religion of the Koreish to El-Islam.

Nasoreans is the name given them by some authors. According to

Petermann they themselves give this title only to those of their number

who are distinguished for character or knowledge. It doubtless comes

from [Greek: Nazôrãioi], the early half-Christian sect of Syria.

[107] The only grammar of the language is the elaborate _Mandäische

Grammatik_ of the indefatigable scholar Nöldeke. One great drawback of

the book however is that the _Hebrew_ character is used throughout and

not the Mandâitic.

[108] Leviticus xiv. 4-7, 49-53.

[109] Cf. Job xxxi. 26-28.

[110] The first printed and translated edition of the _Sidra Rabba_

was by Math. Norberg (Copenhagen, 1815-16), but it is said to be so

defective that it is quite useless critically; Petermann reproduced the

Paris MSS. in two volumes at Leipsic, 1867. Besides the _Sidra Rabba_

there are: _Sidra d’Yaheya_ or Book of St. John, also called _Drasche

d’Malek_ (discourse of the King); The _Diwan_; The _Sidra Neshmata_, or

book of souls; and last, but not least, the books of the zodiac called

_Asfar Malwashee_. Except for the _small_ portion of the _Sidra Rabba_

found in Brandt’s recently published _Mandäische Schriften_ (1895) all

of the above still await critical study and editing.

[111] See the history of Gnostic teaching, especially that of the

Ophites and Sethians. All the evil characters in the Old Testament,

with Cain at their head, were set forth as spiritual heroes. Judas

Iscariot was represented as alone knowing the truth. I find no large

account of the serpent in the Sabean system; this may be otherwise

accounted for.

[112] Gibbon.

[113] Sale’s Koran.

[114] Galatians i. 17.

[115] Gal. i. 18; Acts ix. 9, 25.

[116] Many others, including Hilary, Jerome, Theodoret and the

Occumenian commentators are stated by Rawlinson (St. Paul in Damascus

and Arabia, p. 128), to hold the same opinion. Porter, not alone

of modern writers, puts forth the same view in his “Five Years in

Damascus,” and supposes that Paul’s success was great enough to provoke

the hostility of Aretas and make him join the later persecution.

[117] “Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia,” p. 214.

[118] Koran, Surah vii. 71.

[119] Desert of the Exodus, p. 50.

[120] Acts xvii. 26.

[121] Acts xvii. 29.

[122] Acts xvii. 31.

[123] Acts xvii. 25.

[124] Acts xx. 20, 27.

[125] Wright’s “Early Christianity in Arabia,” 1855.

[126] Buchanan’s Christian Researches.

[127] Wright, p. 77.

[128] The latest version of his life is by Nöldeke in his “Sketches

from Eastern History.” (London, 1892.)

[129] Wright, p. 144.

[130] Kurtz’ “Church History,” Vol. I., p. 386.

[131] See however, _Christianity in China, Tartary and Tibet_, by Abbe

Huc, Vol. I., p. 88 (New York, 1857). He speaks of Christians in Nejran

as late as the tenth century.

[132] See Smith’s “Short History of Missions.” Peroquet, Vie de Raymund

Lull (1667). Low de Vita Ray. Lull (Halle, 1830). Helfferich Raymund

Lull (Berlin, 1858). Dublin _Univ. Mag._, Vol. LXXVIII., p. 43, “His

Life and Work.”

[133] O merciful God, who hast made all men, and hatest nothing that

Thou hast made, nor wouldest the death of a sinner, but rather that

he should be converted and live: have mercy upon all Jews, _Turks_,

Infidels, and Heretics, and take from them all ignorance, hardness of

heart, and contempt of Thy Word, and so fetch them home, blessed Lord,

to Thy flock, that they may be saved among the remnant of the true

Israelites, and be made one fold under one Shepherd, Jesus Christ our

Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Spirit, one God,

world without end. Amen.

[134] “Life of Henry Martyn,” by George Smith, C. I. E., LL. D., (1892)

p. 226.

[135] Journal of Mr. Anthony N. Groves, Missionary to and at Bagdad.

(London, 1831.)

[136] George Smith’s Life of Martyn, p. 563.

[137] In 1876, after the death of Dr. Wilson, Mr. and Mrs. Stothert of

the Free Church Mission arranged to take a trip up the Persian Gulf as

far as Bagdad. They were deeply impressed by the spiritual needs of the

whole of Eastern Arabia. On the way they sold Scriptures and on their

return called attention to the needs of Bagdad. For twenty-five years

special prayer was offered for Eastern Arabia every Monday by these two

missionaries!

[138] _Church Missionary Intelligencer_ for May and June, 1887.

[139] The General also published an account of his journey in Yemen

from a geographical standpoint in the _Geographical Journal_, Vol. IX.,

p. 479. See also _The Missionary Review of the World_, October, 1895.

[140] “The Missionary Expansion since the Reformation.”—Graham, p. 19.

“Life and Letters of Rev. A. Stern.”

[141] On Van Tassel’s work and experiences see “North Africa” (21

Linton Road, Barking, London), Vol. for 1890, pp. 4, 21, 43, 59, 78;

Vol for 1891, pp. 2, 14, 27, 31 and 50.

[142] Mackay of Uganda, by his sister, (New York, 1897) pp. 417-430

gives the article in full.

[143] The text of this resolution is quoted at the head of chapter

thirty-five.

[144] See “Memorials of the Hon. Ion Keith Falconer.”—Robert Sinker

(6th Edition Cambridge 1890) and Ion Keith Falconer, Pioneer in Arabia

by Rev. A. T. Pierson, D. D. (Oct. 1897, _Missionary Review of the

World_).

[145] Kalilah and Dimnah, or The Fables of Bidpai, by I. G. N. Keith

Falconer, Cambridge, 1885.

[146] Life and Correspondence of T. V. French, First Bishop of Lahore,

by Rev. Robert Birks, (Murray, London, 1895). 2 vols.

[147] The letters appeared in the _Church Missionary Intelligencer_,

for May and July, 1891.

[148] An able plea for the acceptance of the Mission by the Church was

made by Rev. J. A. Davis, in the _Christian Intelligencer_, N. Y.,

September 18, 1889.

[149] This meeting with General Haig was described by him in an account

in the London _Christian_ (June, 1891).

[150] The Mohammedan Missionary Problem.—H. H. Jessup, D.D., 1879.

[151] Vol. II., pp. 503-529.

[152] Notes on Islam: A Hand-book for Missionaries.—Rev. Arthur

Brinckman. London, 1868.

[153] Reprinted in “North Africa” (April, 1892), under the title:

_Preaching, not Controversy_.

[154] History of the Church Missionary Society, Vol. II., p. 155.

[155] The Mohammedan Controversy and other articles—Sir Wm. Muir,

Edinburgh, 1897.

[156] _Missionary Review_, October, 1893, p. 727, in article by “C. H.”

[157] Christianity, Islam and the Negro Race, by E. W. Blyden, London,

1888.

[158] Missions in Sumatra, Dr. A. Schreiber, “North Africa,” May, 1896.

[159] Gen. xii. 3, xviii. 8, xxii. 18, xxvi. 4, xxviii. 14; Num. xiv.

21; Forty-three of the Psalms; Isaiah ii. 2, 18, etc., etc.; Jeremiah

iii. 17; Dan. vii. 13, 14; Joel ii. 28; Jonah, iii., iv.; Micah v. 4;

Hab. ii. 14; Zeph. ii. 11; Hag. ii. 6, 7; Zech. ix. 10, xiv. 9; Mal. i.

11.

[160] See Isaiah xxxv. 1-3, xl. 3, xli. 19, xliii. 19, li. 3; Ezekiel

xxxiv. 25, xlvii. 8; Ps. lxxii. 9, etc.

[161] According to Gesenius this is Suez, while Keil identifies it with

Jifar, a site in the northwestern part of Arabia near Egypt.

[162] Compare Rom. iv. 11, and Gal. iii. 17.

[163] Gen. xxi. 9-22.

[164] Gen. xxv. 11-18, and 1 Chron. i. 28.

[165] Isaiah xxi. 13-17 and Jer. xlix. 28-33.

[166] See Smith’s Bible Dictionary.

[167] Cf. Exodus xxiii. 31 and Deut. xi. 24.

[168] _The Christian Intelligencer_ (N. Y.), March 15, 1899.

[169] Consult Bibliographies of Palestine and Syria with inference to

Nomad life; also D. Islam.

[170] Consult also list in Gilman’s Saracens.

[171] Consult British and Foreign Bible Society Reports for account

of Scripture circulation; the _Free Church of Scotland Monthly_

for reports of Keith Falconer Mission; the _Church Missionary

Intelligencer_, 1887, vol. xii., pp. 215, 273, 346, 408; _Missionary

Review of the World_, 1892-1899, October numbers, and _Record of the

American Bible Society_, 1898-1900.

End of Project Gutenberg's Arabia: The Cradle of Islam, by S. M. Zwemer

Arabia: The Cradle of Islam Studies in the Geography, People and Politics of the Peninsula, with an Account of Islam and Mission-Work. · 第 34 / 34 段