A. STROLLO.

It may, and probably will, appear to the reader that a clearer case of

guilt could hardly be established, but the action of juries is always

problematical, and this was a case composed entirely of circumstantial

evidence. The jury would be obliged to find that no reasonable

hypothesis consistent with the innocence of the accused could be

formulated upon the evidence. Thus, even in the face of the facts proven

against him, some "freak" juryman might still have said, "But, after

all, how do you _know_ that Strollo killed him? Some _other_ fellow

might have done it." Even the "faking" of a defence does not prove the

defendant guilty, but merely that he fears conviction, and is ready to

resort to feigned testimony to secure his freedom. Many innocent men

convict themselves in precisely this way.

Accordingly it was by no means with confidence that the People went to

trial, but throughout this remarkable case it seemed as if it must have

been preordained that Strollo should not escape punishment for his

treacherous crime. No defence was possible, not even the partially

prepared alibi was attempted, and the only thing that savored of a

defence was the introduction of a letter alleged to have been received

by the defendant while in the House of Detention, and which, if genuine,

would have apparently established that the crime had been perpetrated by

the "Black Hand."

The offering of this letter was a curious and fatal blunder, for it was

later proven by the People to be in Strollo's own handwriting. It was

his last despairing effort to escape the consequences of his crime.

Headed with a cross drawn in blood it ran as follows:

I swear upon this cross, which is the blood of my veins, Strollo is

innocent. I swear upon the cross the revengeful Black Hand could

save me. New York, Oct. 12, 1905. Sir Strollo, knowing you only by

name, eight days after that I leave this letter will be sent to

you. I leave at seven o'clock with the Steamer Britain the Harbor.

Therefore I leave betraying my oath that I have held for the last

three years belonging to the Black Hand. I will leave three

letters, one to you, one to the Police Officer Capri, and the other

to the law, 300 Mulberry Street. All what I am saying I have sworn

to before God. Therefore your innocence will be given you, first by

God and then by the law, capturing the true murders. I am sure that

they already captured the murderer of Torsielli. Who lured you to

come to New York was Giuseppi Rosa, who knew you for nearly two

years, and who comes from Lambertville, came among us and played

you a trick. He is a Calabrise and has a mighty grudge. He and four

others are averse to them. Announce the name of the man who stabbed

you with the knife was Antonio Villa. He had to kill _you_, but

_you_ was fortunate. He is in jail for the present time and I don't

know for how long, but I know that he was arrested. Nothing else to

say. I have done my duty in giving you all the information. 407 2nd

St., Jersey.

[Illustration: First page of the "Black Hand" letter written by Strollo,

and put in evidence at his trial, placing the murder of Torsielli upon

members of that imaginary secret organization. This letter convicted

him.]

It is clear from the letter that Strollo had formed a vague plan for his

defence, which should, in part, consist of the claim that he, as well

as Torsielli, had been marked for death by the Black Hand, and that

while both had been induced to come to New York, the plans of the

assassins had in his case miscarried.

The reader has already observed that purely for the purpose of securing

his continued interest in the present narrative the writer has, as it

were, told his story backward, reserving as long as possible the fact

that the finding of the beloved Vito was a pure fiction invented by the

murderer. At the trial, however, the jury listened breathlessly while

bit by bit the whole pathetic story was painted before them, like a

mosaic picture. They heard first the story of the mushroom digger, there

of the expedition of Petrosini to Lambertville, of the identification of

Torsielli's body, of the elaborate fabrications of Strollo, and in due

course, of the tell-tale letter in the murderer's pocket. Gradually the

true character of the defendant's crime came over them and they turned

from him in aversion. The natural climax in the evidence was Miss

Phillip's extraordinary identification of the defendant sitting at the

bar as the man who had mailed upon the 26th of July, at the Lambertville

post-office, the envelope purporting to come from Yonkers and containing

the forged letter from the imaginary Vito.

Strollo remained almost to the last confident that he could never be

convicted, but when his own letters in prison were introduced in

evidence he turned ashen pale and stared fixedly at the judge. The jury

deliberated but fifteen minutes, their functions consisting of but a

single ballot, followed by a prayer for the wretched murderer's soul.

Then they filed slowly back and, in the waning light of the summer

afternoon just one year after the murder, and at the precise hour at

which Strollo had killed his victim, pronounced him guilty of murder in

the first degree. In due course his conviction was sustained by the

Court of Appeals, and on March 11th, 1908, he paid the penalty for his

crime in the electric

chair.

True Stories of Crime From the District Attorney's Office · 第 70 / 70 题