CHAPTER XVI

A Few Letters--J. M. Barrie--George Meredith--Advice on

Going to America--A Statue to Washington--Sir Arthur Conan

Doyle and the Rt. Hon. Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.--Robert

Louis Stevenson--Mr Edmund Gosse on the Neo-Scottish School--

_My Contemporaries in Fiction_--Sir A. Conan Doyle--Mr.

Joseph Hocking--Robert Buchanan--Mr. E. Marshall Hall, K.C.

[Illustration: Meredith1]

[Illustration: Meredith2]

[Illustration: Meredith3]

[Illustration: Meredith4]

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray. 15th December

1893._

My Dear Christie Murray,--Your book (my book) followed me up

here, where I had to come unexpectedly two days after our

dinner. It is delightful. I accept your challenge, and do

hereby undertake to talk to you at tremendous length the

first time we meet again about the making of another

novelist. Not that he, worse luck, has had anything like

such varied experiences. I hope you will go on with the

second volume you promise. You will find a capital chapter

for it in the _Pall Mall Magazine_ Xmas number. I thought

that dog worth all the Xmas tales I have read this year. Its

death is almost unbearably pathetic, and so comic all the

time. The illustrator rose to his chances in one picture,

when Punch struts past the bull-dog. The one thing I wonder

at is what you say of acting, I would argue that everyone

with imagination must find delight in the stage, but I can't

understand the author of _Aunt Rachel_ having a desire, or

rather a passion, to exchange a greater art for a smaller

one. It is not smaller, you hold. But surely it is, as the

pianist is less than the composer. I need not tell you again

what it is to me to have the dedication. The whole

arrangement of this house has been altered to give the book

its place of honour, the positions of hundreds of books has

been altered, the bringing of a small bookcase into a

different room led to the alteration of heavy furniture in

the other room, a sofa is where was a cupboard, flowerpots

have been brought inside, and red curtains have given place

to green. This is a fact.

I hope you are flourishing, and with best regards to Mrs.

Murray,--Yours ever,

(Sgd.) J. M. Barrie.

_Letter of Advice sent by a Distinguished American to David

Christie Murray prior to a visit to America on a Lecturing

Tour_.

Friday, 7th September.

My Dear Old Friend,--I am sending.... some letters for you

by this same post. They are to three splendid fellows, full

of power to help you, and certain to be eager to use it

If I could have seen you personally, I had it in mind to say

many things which don't lend themselves to pen and ink. Some

of them perhaps can be put down with a minimum of

awkwardness.

You are primarily, in the American mind, an eminent

novelist. They have read you (in printed cheap editions) by

the score of thousands. They think of you as a cousin of

Dickens, Thackeray, Reade and the rest. Now that is your

rôle marked out for you by God. Stick to it, wear reasonably

conventional clothes, cultivate an intelligently conventional

aspect, and do not for your life say anything about the

stage or the latter-day hard luck you have had, or anything

else which will not commend itself to a popular sense which,

although artistic on one side is implacably Philistine on

the other. They have a tremendous regard for Reade. Carry

yourself as if you were the undoubted inheritor of the Reade

traditions. Think how Reade himself would have borne

himself--then strike out from it all the bumptious and

aggressive parts--and be the rest.

Two things destroy a man in America. One is the

suggestion of personal eccentricity, Bohemianism, etc. The

other is a disposition for criticism and controversy on

their own subjects. The latter is the more dangerous of the

two. It is a people devoured by the newspaper habit, like

the Irish or the old Greeks of the Areopagus. They ask every

few minutes “What is the news?” Thousands of smart young men

are hustling about fifteen hours a day to answer that

ceaseless question. If it occurs to any one of them anywhere

to say: “Well, here is a cocky Englishman who is over here

to make some money, but who is unable to resist the

temptation to harangue us on our shortcomings”--just that

minute you are damned--irrevocably damned. That one sniff of

blood will suffice. The whole pack will be on your shoulders

within twenty-four hours.

Yet, don't mistake me. These same newspaper men are nice

fellows, kindly to a fault, if you avoid rubbing them the

wrong way. Swear to yourself that you will be genial and

affable with every human soul you meet, and that you will

never be betrayed into an argument--on _any American

subject_, mind--with any living being, from the bartender

up. It is not so hard a rule, old man, and observing it

vehemently day and night will make all the wide difference

to you between miserable failure and a fine and substantial

success.

You will meet two classes of men--scholarly men like my

friends, who will take you to clubs where writers, thinkers,

students, etc., congregate, and less scholarly but not

less likeable ordinary newspaper men. Live your life as

much as possible among these two classes. You will catch

swiftly enough the shades of difference between the two. It

is the difference between, say, the Athenaeum and the

Savage. Only there is next to no caste spirit, and points of

similarity or even community crop up there between the two

which couldn't be here. The golden key to both is unvarying

amiability.

You are better calculated than most men I know to charm and

captivate them all. They will delight in your conversation

and in you, and they will see to it that you have a perfect

time and coin money--if only you lay yourself out to be

uniformly nice to them, and watch carefully to see that you

seem to be doing about as they do.

A good many minor people--hotel baggagemen, clerks, etc.,

tram conductors, policemen and the like--will seem to you

to be monstrously rude and unobliging. You will be right;

they are undoubtedly God-damned uncivil brutes. That is one

of the unhappy conditions of our life there. _Don't_ be

tempted even to wrangle with them or talk back to them. Pass

on, and keep still. If you try to do anything else, the

upshot will be your appearing somewhere in print as a damned

Britisher for whom American ways are not good enough. The

whole country is one vast sounding board, and it vibrates

with perilous susceptibility in response to an English

accent.

Don't mention the word Ireland. Perhaps that is most

important of all. You will hear lots of Americans--good men,

too--damning the Irish. Listen to this, and say nothing,

unless something amiable about the Irish occurs to you.

Because here is a mysterious paradox. The America always

damns the Irishman. It is his foible. But if an Englishman

joins in, instantly every American within earshot hates him

for it. I plead with you to avoid that pitfall. The bottom

of it is paved with the bones of your compatriots.

So I could go on indefinitely, but I have already taxed your

patience. Briefly then--

1. Express no opinions on American subjects, political,

social or racial-save in praise.

2. Be polite and ready to talk affably wit everybody;

men who speak to you in a railway train, or the bar

tender or the bootblack, quite as much as the rest.

3. Avoid like poison eccentricities of dress and all

contact with actors an theatrical people.

4. Rebuff no interviewer. Be invariably affable

and reserved with him talk literature to him, and

reminicences of Reade, Matthew Arnold, Dean Stanley,

anybody you like especially mention things in America

which you like, and shut-up about what you don't like.

5. Keep appointments to a minute. No one else

will, but they respect immensely in others.

6. Bear in mind always that people think of you as a

big novelist, and will be only too glad to treat you at

your own valuation, gently exhibited or rather

suggested by courteous reserve. There is nothing they

won't do for you, if only you impress them as liking

them, and appreciating their kindliness, and being

studious of their sensibilities.

Take this all, my dear Christie, as from one who sincerely

wishes you well, and believes that you can and should do

well. It lies absolutely in your own hands to make a fine

personal and professional reputation in America, and to come

back with a solid bank account and a good, clear, fresh

start. You have lots of years before you; lots of important

work; lots of honest happiness. You were started once fair

on the road to the top of the tree. Here is the chance to

get back again on to that road. I am so fearfully anxious

that you should not miss it, that I take large liberties in

talking to you as I find I have done. Write to me at

Attridge's Hotel, Schull, County Cork, where I shall be from

14th to 20th September, to tell me that you are not

offended. Or if you are offended, still write to me. And I

should prize highly the chance of hearing from you from the

other side, after you have started in.

And so God be with you.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray, 8th May 1896_.

My Dear Christie Murray,--I have been in Egypt and have only

just got back and received your note. Poor Holmes is dead

and damned. I couldn't revive him if I would (at least not

for years), for I have had such an overdose of him that I

feel towards him as I do towards _pâté de foie gras_, of

which I once ate too much, so that the name of it gives me a

sickly feeling to this day. Any old Holmes story you are, of

course, most welcome to use.

I am house-hunting in the country, which means continual

sallies and alarms, but I should much like to meet you

before I go away, to talk over our American experiences. I

do hope you are not going to allow lecturing to get in the

way of your writing. We have too few born story-tellers.--

With all kind regards. Yours very truly,

(Sgd.) A. Conan Doyle.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray (undated)_.

My Dear Sir,--I think that your idea of a statue to

Washington to be erected by public subscription in London is

an admirable one. The future of the world belongs to the

Anglo-Celtic races if they can but work in unison, and

everything which works for that end makes for the highest. I

believe that the great stream which bifurcated a century ago

may have re-united before many more centuries have passed,

and that we shall all have learned by then that patriotism

is not to be limited by flags or systems, but that it should

embrace all of the same race and blood and speech. It would

be a great thing--one of the most noble and magnanimous

things in the history of the world--if a proud people should

consent to adorn their capital with the statue of one who

bore arms against them. I wish you every success in your

idea, and shall be happy to contribute ten guineas towards

its realisation.--Yours very truly,

(Sgd.) A. Conan Doyle.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray, 6th May 1897_.

Dear Sir,--I have to acknowledge with thanks the receipt of

your letter of May 1st I thoroughly appreciate the spirit of

your suggestion, but am inclined to doubt its wisdom at the

present time. I do not see how any human being on either

side of the Atlantic can dispute the good-feeling already

entertained towards the United States by every class of the

population here. I am afraid, however, that it is not

generally reciprocated, and the Americans are apt to

misunderstand some of our efforts to conciliate them, and to

attribute them to less worthy motives. I have heard several

distinguished Americans protest against the “gush,” as they

call it, in which we indulge. Under these circumstances, I

think the project of a statue to George Washington should

be, for the present, postponed,--I am, yours truly,

(Sgd.) Joseph Chamberlain.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray, 22nd February

1897_.

29 Delamere Terrace, Westbourne Sq., W.

My Dear Sir,--May a delighted reader of your articles in the

_Sun_ presume on a very slight acquaintance with their

author to say how greatly he admires them? The paper on

Dickens seemed to me to dissolve that writer's peculiar

charm with a truer alchemy than any criticism I had ever

read. And now that with such splendid courage you tilt

against the painted bladder-babies of the neo-Scottish

school,--with so much real moderation too, with such a

dignified statement of the reasons for such a judgment,--I

cannot rest, I must say “Bravo.” The distinction between the

false North Britons (mere phantoms) and the true Stevenson

and Barrie (real creatures of the imagination, if sometimes,

in their detail, a little whimsical, even a little

diminutive) is put so admirably as I had not yet seen it

put.

I am eager for next Sunday's article, and as long as these

papers continue I shall read them with avidity. I detect in

every paragraph that genuine passion for literature which is

so rare, and which is the only thing worth living the life

of letters for.

Pardon my intrusion, and accept my thanks once more.--

Believe me to be, faithfully yours,

(Sgd.) Edmund Gosse.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray (undated)_.

Undershaw, Hindhead, Haslemere

My Dear Murray,--I shall be delighted and honoured to have a

first glance at the ms. I never read anything of yours which

I did not like, so I am sure I shall like it, but there are

degrees of liking, and I will tell you frankly which degree

I register.

Now you will bear that visit in mind and write to me when

you are ready and your work done.--With all kind regards,

yours very truly,

(Sgd.) A. Conan Doyle.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray (undated)_.

Undershaw, Hindhead, Haslemere.

My Dear Murray,--I have just finished your critical book and

think it most excellent and useful. I couldn't help writing

to you to say so. It is really fine--so well-balanced and

clear-sighted and judicial. For kind words about myself many

thanks. I don't think we are suffering from critical

kindness so much as _indiscriminate_ critical kindness. No

one has said enough, as it seems to me, about Barrie or

Kipling. I think they are fit--young as they are--to rank

with the highest, and that some of Barrie's work, _Margaret

Ogilvy_ and _A Window in Thrums_, will endear him as Robert

Burns is endeared to the hearts of the future Scottish race.

I have just settled down here and we are getting the

furniture in and all in order. In a week or so it will be

quite right. If ever you should be at a loose end at a week-

end, or any other time, I wish you would run down. I believe

we could make you happy for a few days. Name your date and

the room will be ready. Only from the 16th to the 26th it is

pre-empted.--With all kind remembrances, yours very truly,

(Sgd.) A. Conan Doyle

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray. 9th Sept. 1897_.

148 Todmorden Road, Burnley, Lanes.

My Dear Sir,--Will you kindly excuse the liberty I take in

writing? I have just bought and read your new book _My

Contemporaries in Fiction_. and feel that I must thank you.

The task you assumed was, I think, necessary, and your

estimate of the various writers just, and on the whole

generous. I know my opinion is of little value, but I have

long felt that several of our modern novelists were

appraised miles beyond their merits, and I have often wished

that some man of position, one who could speak candidly

without fear of being accused of being envious, would give

to the world a fair and fearless criticism of the works of

novelists about whom some so-called critics rave. Thousands

will be glad that you have done this, and I hope your book

will have the success it deserves.

It will be a matter for thankfulness, too, that you have

tried to do justice to George Macdonald, and to give him the

place he deserves. To read the fulsome stuff which is so

often written about Crockett, and then to think that

Macdonald is quietly shelved, is enough to make one sick at

heart Certainly, I shall do all that lies in my power to

make your work known.

I do wish, however that you had devoted a few pages to one

who, a few years ago, loomed large in the literary horizon.

I mean Robert Buchanan. I know that during these last few

years he has poured out a great deal of drivel, but I cannot

forget books like _The New Abelard_, and especially, _God

and the Man_. It is a matter of surprise and regret that one

of Buchanan's undoubted powers should have thrown himself

away as he has done. All the same, the man who wrote _God

and the Man_ and _The Shadow of the Sword_, hysterical as

the latter may be, deserves a place in such a book as yours,

and an honest criticism, such as I am sure you could give,

might lead him, even yet, to give us a work worthy of the

promise of years ago.

I am afraid you will regard this letter as presumptuous,

nevertheless, I am prompted by sincere admiration. Years ago

I read _Joseph's Coat_ and _Aunt Rachel_, and still think

the latter to be one of the tenderest and most beautiful

things in fiction. I also remember the simple scene which

gave the title to the book called _A Bit of Human Nature_,

and shall never cease to admire what seems to me a flash of

real genius. Consequently, when I stood close by you at a

“Vagabond's” dinner, on the ladies' night some months ago, I

was strongly impelled to ask for an introduction, but lacked

the necessary audacity to carry out my one time

determination.

Again thanking you for a book which has afforded me a

genuine pleasure to read, besides giving me much mental

stimulus,--I am, dear sir, yours very truly,

(Sgd.) Joseph Hocking.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray. 17th June 1897_.

Dear Murray,--I am getting so weary of controversy that I

must decline to take part, directly or indirectly, in any

more. Possibly, in the heat of annoyance, I may have said

harsh things about Mr Scott, but if so, I have forgotten

them, and I think all harsh things are better forgotten. I

am sorry, therefore, to hear that you are on the war-path,

and wish I could persuade you to turn back to the paths of

peace. You are too valuable to be wasted in this sort of

warfare. I daresay you will smile at such advice from _me_,

of all men, but believe me, I speak from sad experience.

I was sorry to hear about the fate of your play, but 'tis

the fortune of war, and I hope it will only stir you to

another effort which may possess, not more merit, possibly,

but better _luck_, which now-a-days counts more than merit.

--With all good wishes, I am, yours truly,

(Sgd.) Robert Buchanan.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray, Sept. 1st_.

“Merliland,” 25 Maresfield Gardens, South Hampstead, N.W.

Dear Christie Murray,--I thank you for your kind breath of

encouragement, and am very glad that my _Outcast_ contains

anything to awaken a response in so fine a nature as your

own. It was very good of you to think of writing to me on

the subject at all.

I can't help thinking that men who still hold to the old

traditions should stick together and form some kind of a

phalanx. I was not sorry, therefore, to hear that you had

expressed yourself freely about the craze of a noisy

minority for formlessness and ugliness in realistic

literature. Ibsen's style, regarded merely as style, bears

the same relation to good writing that the _Star_ newspaper

does to a Greek statue. I don't myself much mind what morals

a man teaches, so long as he preserves the morality of

beautiful _form_, but at the rate we are now going,

literature seems likely to become a series of _causes

célèbres_ chronicled in the language of the penny-a-liner.

And over and above this is the dirty habit, growing upon

many able men, of examining their secretions, always an

evident sign of hypochondria.

I am awaiting with much interest your further steps on the

plane dramatic. Meantime, I hope I shall see more of you and

yours. With kind regards.--Truly yours,

(Sgd.) Robert Buchanan.

_Copy of Letter to David Christie Murray. 17th January

1905_.

75 Cambridge Terrace, W.

Dear Sir,--I trust you will forgive my writing you, but I

cannot make use of another man's brains without some

acknowledgment. For years I have been a reader of the

_Referee_, and of late years nothing has interested me more

than the articles above the name of Merlin on the front

page. This week you have put the real issue so clearly and

so freely, that I am going to avail myself of it tonight in

my speech at Blandford, and I hope I have your permission so

to do. If only a few more men would grasp difficult subjects

as boldly and broadly as you do, we should be a better and a

happier people.--Yours very faithfully,

(Sgd.) E. Marshall Hall.

[Illustration: Stevenson1]

[Illustration: Stevenson2]

[Illustration: Stevenson3]

[Illustration: Stevenson4]

Recollections With Photogravure Portrait of the Author and a number of Original Letters, of which one by George Meredith and another by Robert Louis Stevenson are reproduced in facsimile · 第 16 / 17 章