Ovid. [1]]

I have been very often tempted to write Invectives upon those who have

detracted from my Works, or spoken in derogation of my Person; but I

look upon it as a particular Happiness, that I have always hindred my

Resentments from proceeding to this extremity. I once had gone thro

half a Satyr, but found so many Motions of Humanity rising in me towards

the Persons whom I had severely treated, that I threw it into the Fire

without ever finishing it. I have been angry enough to make several

little Epigrams and Lampoons; and after having admired them a Day or

two, have likewise committed them to the Flames. These I look upon as so

many Sacrifices to Humanity, and have receiv'd much greater Satisfaction

from the suppressing such Performances, than I could have done from any

Reputation they might have procur'd me, or from any Mortification they

might have given my Enemies, in case I had made them publick. If a Man

has any Talent in Writing, it shews a good Mind to forbear answering

Calumnies and Reproaches in the same Spirit of Bitterness with which

they are offered: But when a Man has been at some Pains in making

suitable Returns to an Enemy, and has the Instruments of Revenge in his

Hands, to let drop his Wrath, and stifle his Resentments, seems to have

something in it Great and Heroical. There is a particular Merit in such

a way of forgiving an Enemy; and the more violent and unprovoke'd the

Offence has been, the greater still is the Merit of him who thus

forgives it.

I never met with a Consideration that is more finely spun, and what has

better pleased me, than one in Epictetus [2], which places an Enemy in a

new Light, and gives us a View of him altogether different from that in

which we are used to regard him. The Sense of it is as follows: Does a

Man reproach thee for being Proud or Ill-natured, Envious or Conceited,

Ignorant or Detracting? Consider with thy self whether his Reproaches

are true; if they are not, consider that thou art not the Person whom he

reproaches, but that he reviles an Imaginary Being, and perhaps loves

what thou really art, tho he hates what thou appearest to be. If his

Reproaches are true, if thou art the envious ill-natur'd Man he takes

thee for, give thy self another Turn, become mild, affable and obliging,

and his Reproaches of thee naturally cease: His Reproaches may indeed

continue, but thou art no longer the Person whom he reproaches.

I often apply this Rule to my self; and when I hear of a Satyrical

Speech or Writing that is aimed at me, I examine my own Heart, whether I

deserve it or not. If I bring in a Verdict against my self, I endeavour

to rectify my Conduct for the future in those particulars which have

drawn the Censure upon me; but if the whole Invective be grounded upon a

Falsehood, I trouble my self no further about it, and look upon my Name

at the Head of it to signify no more than one of those fictitious Names

made use of by an Author to introduce an imaginary Character. Why should

a Man be sensible of the Sting of a Reproach, who is a Stranger to the

Guilt that is implied in it? or subject himself to the Penalty, when he

knows he has never committed the Crime? This is a Piece of Fortitude,

which every one owes to his own Innocence, and without which it is

impossible for a Man of any Merit or Figure to live at Peace with

himself in a Country that abounds with Wit and Liberty.

The famous Monsieur Balzac, in a Letter to the Chancellor of France, [3]

who had prevented the Publication of a Book against him, has the

following Words, which are a likely Picture of the Greatness of Mind so

visible in the Works of that Author. If it was a new thing, it may be I

should not be displeased with the Suppression of the first Libel that

should abuse me; but since there are enough of em to make a small

Library, I am secretly pleased to see the number increased, and take

delight in raising a heap of Stones that Envy has cast at me without

doing me any harm.

The Author here alludes to those Monuments of the Eastern Nations, which

were Mountains of Stones raised upon the dead Body by Travellers, that

used to cast every one his Stone upon it as they passed by. It is

certain that no Monument is so glorious as one which is thus raised by

the Hands of Envy. For my Part, I admire an Author for such a Temper of

Mind as enables him to bear an undeserved Reproach without Resentment,

more than for all the Wit of any the finest Satirical Reply.

Thus far I thought necessary to explain my self in relation to those who

have animadverted on this Paper, and to shew the Reasons why I have not

thought fit to return them any formal Answer. I must further add, that

the Work would have been of very little use to the Publick, had it been

filled with personal Reflections and Debates; for which Reason I have

never once turned out of my way to observe those little Cavils which

have been made against it by Envy or Ignorance. The common Fry of

Scriblers, who have no other way of being taken Notice of but by

attacking what has gain'd some Reputation in the World, would have

furnished me with Business enough, had they found me dispos'd to enter

the Lists with them.

I shall conclude with the Fable of Boccalini's Traveller, who was so

pester'd with the Noise of Grasshoppers in his Ears, that he alighted

from his Horse in great Wrath to kill them all. This, says the Author,

was troubling himself to no manner of purpose: Had he pursued his

Journey without taking notice of them, the troublesome Insects would

have died of themselves in a very few Weeks, and he would have suffered

nothing from them.

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 278 / 384 题