L.

[Footnote 1: [These are what Aristotle means by the Fable and &c.]]

[Footnote 2: [Offspring]]

[Footnote 3: [Son of Aurora who has]]

[Footnote 4: [that his Poem]]

[Footnote 5: It was especially for the novelty of _Paradise Lost_, that

John Dennis had in 1704 exalted Milton above the ancients. In putting

forward a prospectus of a large projected work upon the Grounds of

Criticism in Poetry, he gave as a specimen of the character of his

work, the substance of what would be said in the beginning of the

Criticism upon Milton. Here he gave Milton supremacy on ground precisely

opposite to that chosen by Addison. He described him as

one of the greatest and most daring Genius's that has appear'd in the

World, and who has made his country a glorious present of the most

lofty, but most irregular Poem, that has been produc'd by the Mind of

Man. That great Man had a desire to give the World something like an

Epick Poem; but he resolv'd at the same time to break thro the Rules

of Aristotle. Not that he was ignorant of them, or contemned them....

Milton was the first who in the space of almost 4000 years resolv'd

for his Country's Honour and his own, to present the World with an

Original Poem; that is to say, a Poem that should have his own

thoughts, his own images, and his own spirit. In order to this he was

resolved to write a Poem, that, by virtue of its extraordinary

Subject, cannot so properly be said to be against the Rules as it may

be affirmed to be above them all ... We shall now shew for what

Reasons the choice of Milton's Subject, as it set him free from the

obligation which he lay under to the Poetical Laws, so it necessarily

threw him upon new Thoughts, new Images, and an Original Spirit. In

the next place we shall shew that his Thoughts, his Images, and by

consequence too, his Spirit are actually new, and different from those

of Homer and Virgil. Thirdly, we shall shew, that besides their

Newness, they have vastly the Advantage of _Homer and Virgil_.]

[Footnote 6: Paradise Lost, Book II.]

[Footnote 7: interwoven in]

[Footnote 8: Sir Samuel Garth in his _Dispensary_, a mock-heroic poem

upon a dispute, in 1696, among doctors over the setting up of a

Dispensary in a room of the College of Physicians for relief of the sick

poor, houses the God of Sloth within the College, and outside, among

other allegories, personifies Disease as a Fury to whom the enemies of

the Dispensary offer libation. Boileau in his _Lutrin_ a mock-heroic

poem written in 1673 on a dispute between two chief personages of the

chapter of a church in Paris, la Sainte Chapelle, as to the position of

a pulpit, had with some minor allegory, chiefly personified Discord, and

made her enter into the form of an old precentor, very much as in

Garths poem the Fury Disease

Shrill Colons person took,

In morals loose, but most precise in look.]

[Footnote 9: [that such]]

[Footnote 10: Poetics II. § 17; III. §6.]

[Footnote 11: [particular]]

[Footnote 12: 1 Poetics II. § ii. But Addison misquotes the first

clause. Aristotle says that when a wholly virtuous man falls from

prosperity into adversity, this is neither terrible _nor piteous_, but

([Greek: miaron]) shocking. Then he adds that our pity is _excited_ by

undeserved misfortune, and our terror by some resemblance between the

sufferer and ourselves.]

[Footnote 13: [have been still]]

* * * * *

No. 274. Monday, January 14, 1712. Steele.

Audire est operæ pretium, procedere recte

Qui moechis non vultis.

Hor.

I have upon several Occasions (that have occurred since I first took

into my Thoughts the present State of Fornication) weighed with my self,

in behalf of guilty Females, the Impulses of Flesh and Blood, together

with the Arts and Gallantries of crafty Men; and reflect with some Scorn

that most Part of what we in our Youth think gay and polite, is nothing

else but an Habit of indulging a Pruriency that Way. It will cost some

Labour to bring People to so lively a Sense of this, as to recover the

manly Modesty in the Behaviour of my Men Readers, and the bashful Grace

in the Faces of my Women; but in all Cases which come into Debate, there

are certain things previously to be done before we can have a true Light

into the Subject Matter; therefore it will, in the first Place, be

necessary to consider the impotent Wenchers and industrious Haggs, who

are supplied with, and are constantly supplying new Sacrifices to the

Devil of Lust. You are to know then, if you are so happy as not to know

it already, that the great Havock which is made in the Habitations of

Beauty and Innocence, is committed by such as can only lay waste and not

enjoy the Soil. When you observe the present State of Vice and Virtue,

the Offenders are such as one would think should have no Impulse to what

they are pursuing; as in Business, you see sometimes Fools pretend to be

Knaves, so in Pleasure, you will find old Men set up for Wenchers. This

latter sort of Men are the great Basis and Fund of Iniquity in the Kind

we are speaking of: You shall have an old rich Man often receive Scrawls

from the several Quarters of the Town, with Descriptions of the new

Wares in their Hands, if he will please to send Word when he will be

waited on. This Interview is contrived, and the Innocent is brought to

such Indecencies as from Time to Time banish Shame and raise Desire.

With these Preparatives the Haggs break their Wards by little and

little, till they are brought to lose all Apprehensions of what shall

befall them in the Possession of younger Men. It is a common Postscript

of an Hagg to a young Fellow whom she invites to a new Woman, _She has,

I assure you, seen none but old Mr. Such-a-one_. It pleases the old

Fellow that the Nymph is brought to him unadorned, and from his Bounty

she is accommodated with enough to dress her for other Lovers. This is

the most ordinary Method of bringing Beauty and Poverty into the

Possession of the Town: But the particular Cases of kind Keepers,

skilful Pimps, and all others who drive a separate Trade, and are not in

the general Society or Commerce of Sin, will require distinct

Consideration. At the same time that we are thus severe on the

Abandoned, we are apt to represent the Case of others with that

Mitigation as the Circumstances demand. Calling Names does no Good; to

speak worse of any thing than it deserves, does only take off from the

Credit of the Accuser, and has implicitly the Force of an Apology in the

Behalf of the Person accused. We shall therefore, according as the

Circumstances differ, vary our Appellations of these Criminals: Those

who offend only against themselves, and are not Scandals to Society, but

out of Deference to the sober Part of the World, have so much Good left

in them as to be ashamed, must not be huddled in the common Word due to

the worst of Women; but Regard is to be had to their Circumstances when

they fell, to the uneasy Perplexity under which they lived under

senseless and severe Parents, to the Importunity of Poverty, to the

Violence of a Passion in its Beginning well grounded, and all other

Alleviations which make unhappy Women resign the Characteristick of

their Sex, Modesty. To do otherwise than thus, would be to act like a

Pedantick Stoick, who thinks all Crimes alike, and not like an impartial

SPECTATOR, who looks upon them with all the Circumstances that diminish

or enhance the Guilt. I am in Hopes, if this Subject be well pursued,

Women will hereafter from their Infancy be treated with an Eye to their

future State in the World; and not have their Tempers made too

untractable from an improper Sourness or Pride, or too complying from

Familiarity or Forwardness contracted at their own Houses. After these

Hints on this Subject, I shall end this Paper with the following genuine

Letter; and desire all who think they may be concerned in future

Speculations on this Subject, to send in what they have to say for

themselves for some Incidents in their Lives, in order to have proper

Allowances made for their Conduct.

_Mr_. SPECTATOR, _January_ 5, 1711.

The Subject of your Yesterdays Paper is of so great Importance, and

the thorough handling of it may be so very useful to the Preservation

of many an innocent young Creature, that I think every one is obliged

to furnish you with what Lights he can, to expose the pernicious Arts

and Practices of those unnatural Women called Bawds. In order to this

the enclosed is sent you, which is _verbatim_ the Copy of a Letter

written by a Bawd of Figure in this Town to a noble Lord. I have

concealed the Names of both, my Intention being not to expose the

Persons but the Thing.

_I am,

SIR,

Your humble Servant_.

_My Lord_,

I having a great Esteem for your Honour, and a better Opinion of

you than of any of the Quality, makes me acquaint you of an Affair

that I hope will oblige you to know. I have a Niece that came to

Town about a Fortnight ago. Her Parents being lately dead she came

to me, expecting to a found me in so good a Condition as to a set

her up in a Milliners Shop. Her Father gave Fourscore Pounds with

her for five Years: Her Time is out, and she is not Sixteen; as

pretty a black Gentlewoman as ever you saw, a little Woman, which I

know your Lordship likes: well shaped, and as fine a Complection for

Red and White as ever I saw; I doubt not but your Lordship will be

of the same Opinion. She designs to go down about a Month hence

except I can provide for her, which I cannot at present. Her Father

was one with whom all he had died with him, so there is four

Children left destitute; so if your Lordship thinks fit to make an

Appointment where I shall wait on you with my Niece, by a Line or

two, I stay for your Answer; for I have no Place fitted up since I

left my House, fit to entertain your Honour. I told her she should

go with me to see a Gentleman a very good Friend of mine; so I

desire you to take no Notice of my Letter by reason she is ignorant

of the Ways of the Town. My Lord, I desire if you meet us to come

alone; for upon my Word and Honour you are the first that ever I

mentioned her to. So I remain,

_Your Lordships

Most humble Servant to Command._

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 126 / 384 题