T.

[Footnote 1: Satisfactions]

[Footnote 2: [For this Reason should they appear the least like what

they were so much used to laugh at, they would become the Jest of

themselves, and the Object of that Raillery they formerly bestowed on

others. To avoid &c.]

[Footnote 3: [by], and in first reprint.]

* * * * *

No. 237. Saturday, December 1, 1711. Addison.

Visu carentem magna pars veri latet.

Senec. in OEdip.

It is very reasonable to believe, that Part of the Pleasure which happy

Minds shall enjoy in a future State, will arise from an enlarged

Contemplation of the Divine Wisdom in the Government of the World, and a

Discovery of the secret and amazing Steps of Providence, from the

Beginning to the End of Time. Nothing seems to be an Entertainment more

adapted to the Nature of Man, if we consider that Curiosity is one of

the strongest and most lasting Appetites implanted in us, and that

Admiration is one of our most pleasing Passions; and what a perpetual

Succession of Enjoyments will be afforded to both these, in a Scene so

large and various as shall then be laid open to our View in the Society

of superior Spirits, who perhaps will join with us in so delightful a

Prospect!

It is not impossible, on the contrary, that Part of the Punishment of

such as are excluded from Bliss, may consist not only in their being

denied this Privilege, but in having their Appetites at the same time

vastly encreased, without any Satisfaction afforded to them. In these,

the vain Pursuit of Knowledge shall, perhaps, add to their Infelicity,

and bewilder them into Labyrinths of Error, Darkness, Distraction and

Uncertainty of every thing but their own evil State. _Milton_ has thus

represented the fallen Angels reasoning together in a kind of Respite

from their Torments, and creating to themselves a new Disquiet amidst

their very Amusements; he could not properly have described the Sports

of condemned Spirits, without that Cast of Horror and Melancholy he has

so judiciously mingled with them.

Others apart sate on a Hill retired,

In Thoughts more elevate, and reason'd high

Of Providence, Foreknowledge, Will, and Fate,

First Fate, Freewill, Foreknowledge absolute,

And found no End in wandring Mazes lost. [1]

In our present Condition, which is a middle State, our Minds are, as it

were, chequered with Truth and Falshood; and as our Faculties are

narrow, and our Views imperfect, it is impossible but our Curiosity must

meet with many Repulses. The Business of Mankind in this Life being

rather to act than to know, their Portion of Knowledge is dealt to them

accordingly.

From hence it is, that the Reason of the Inquisitive has so long been

exercised with Difficulties, in accounting for the promiscuous

Distribution of Good and Evil to the Virtuous and the Wicked in this

World. From hence come all those pathetical Complaints of so many

tragical Events, which happen to the Wise and the Good; and of such

surprising Prosperity, which is often the Lot[2] of the Guilty and the

Foolish; that Reason is sometimes puzzled, and at a loss what to

pronounce upon so mysterious a Dispensation.

_Plato_ expresses his Abhorrence of some Fables of the Poets, which seem

to reflect on the Gods as the Authors of Injustice; and lays it down as

a Principle, That whatever is permitted to befal a just Man, whether

Poverty, Sickness, or any of those Things which seem to be Evils, shall

either in Life or Death conduce to his Good. My Reader will observe how

agreeable this Maxim is to what we find delivered by a greater

Authority. _Seneca_ has written a Discourse purposely on this

Subject[3], in which he takes Pains, after the Doctrine of the

_Stoicks_, to shew that Adversity is not in itself an Evil; and mentions

a noble Saying of _Demetrius_, That _nothing would be more unhappy than

a Man who had never known Affliction_. He compares Prosperity to the

Indulgence of a fond Mother to a Child, which often proves his Ruin; but

the Affection of the Divine Being to that of a wise Father who would

have his Sons exercised with Labour, Disappointment, and Pain, that they

may gather Strength, and improve their Fortitude. On this Occasion the

Philosopher rises into the celebrated Sentiment, That there is not on

Earth a Spectator more worthy the Regard of a Creator intent on his

Works than a brave Man superior to his Sufferings; to which he adds,

That it must be a Pleasure to _Jupiter_ himself to look down from

Heaven, and see _Cato_ amidst the Ruins of his Country preserving his

Integrity.

This Thought will appear yet more reasonable, if we consider human Life

as a State of Probation, and Adversity as the Post of Honour in it,

assigned often to the best and most select Spirits.

But what I would chiefly insist on here, is, that we are not at present

in a proper Situation to judge of the Counsels by which Providence acts,

since but little arrives at our Knowledge, and even that little we

discern imperfectly; or according to the elegant Figure in Holy Writ,

_We see but in part, and as in a Glass darkly_. [It is to be considered,

that Providence[4]] in its Oeconomy regards the whole System of Time and

Things together, [so that] we cannot discover the beautiful Connection

between Incidents which lie widely separated in Time, and by losing so

many Links of the Chain, our Reasonings become broken and imperfect.

Thus those Parts in the moral World which have not an absolute, may yet

have a relative Beauty, in respect of some other Parts concealed from

us, but open to his Eye before whom _Past, Present_, and _To come_, are

set together in one Point of View: and those Events, the Permission of

which seems now to accuse his Goodness, may in the Consummation of

Things both magnify his Goodness, and exalt his Wisdom. And this is

enough to check our Presumption, since it is in vain to apply our

Measures of Regularity to Matters of which we know neither the

Antecedents nor the Consequents, the Beginning nor the End.

I shall relieve my Reader from this abstracted Thought, by relating here

a _Jewish_ Tradition concerning _Moses_ [5] which seems to be a kind of

Parable, illustrating what I have last mentioned. That great Prophet, it

is said, was called up by a Voice from Heaven to the top of a Mountain;

where, in a Conference with the Supreme Being, he was permitted to

propose to him some Questions concerning his Administration of the

Universe. In the midst of this Divine [Colloquy [6]] he was commanded to

look down on the Plain below. At the Foot of the Mountain there issued

out a clear Spring of Water, at which a Soldier alighted from his Horse

to drink. He was no sooner gone than a little Boy came to the same

Place, and finding a Purse of Gold which the Soldier had dropped, took

it up and went away with it. Immediately after this came an infirm old

Man, weary with Age and Travelling, and having quenched his Thirst, sat

down to rest himself by the Side of the Spring. The Soldier missing his

Purse returns to search for it, and demands it of the old Man, who

affirms he had not seen it, and appeals to Heaven in witness of his

Innocence. The Soldier not believing his Protestations, kills him.

_Moses_ fell on his Face with Horror and Amazement, when the Divine

Voice thus prevented his Expostulation: Be not surprised, _Moses_, nor

ask why the Judge of the whole Earth has suffer'd this Thing to come to

pass: The Child is the Occasion that the Blood of the old Man is spilt;

but know, that the old Man whom thou sawst, was the Murderer of that

Child's Father [7].

[Footnote 1: Paradise Lost, B. II. v. 557-561.]

[Footnote 2: In Saturdays Spectator, _for_ reward _read_ lot.

Erratum in No. 238.]

[Footnote 3: De Constantia Sapientis.]

[Footnote 4: [Since Providence, therefore], and in 1st rep.]

[Footnote 5: Henry Mores Divine Dialogues.]

[Footnote 6: [Conference]]

[Footnote 7: No letter appended to original issue or reissue. Printed in

Addison's Works, 1720. The paper has been claimed for John Hughes in the

Preface to his Poems (1735).]

* * * * *

No. 238. Monday, December 3, 1711. Steele.

Nequicquam populo bibulas donaveris Aures;

Respue quod non es.

Persius, Sat. 4.

Among all the Diseases of the Mind, there is not one more epidemical or

more pernicious than the Love of Flattery. For as where the Juices of

the Body are prepared to receive a malignant Influence, there the

Disease rages with most Violence; so in this Distemper of the Mind,

where there is ever a Propensity and Inclination to suck in the Poison,

it cannot be but that the whole Order of reasonable Action must be

overturn'd, for, like Musick, it

--So softens and disarms the Mind,

That not one Arrow can Resistance find.

First we flatter ourselves, and then the Flattery of others is sure of

Success. It awakens our Self-Love within, a Party which is ever ready to

revolt from our better Judgment, and join the Enemy without. Hence it

is, that the Profusion of Favours we so often see poured upon the

Parasite, are represented to us, by our Self-Love, as Justice done to

Man, who so agreeably reconciles us to our selves. When we are overcome

by such soft Insinuations and ensnaring Compliances, we gladly

recompense the Artifices that are made use of to blind our Reason, and

which triumph over the Weaknesses of our Temper and Inclinations.

But were every Man perswaded from how mean and low a Principle this

Passion is derived, there can be no doubt but the Person who should

attempt to gratify it, would then be as contemptible as he is now

successful. Tis the Desire of some Quality we are not possessed of, or

Inclination to be something we are not, which are the Causes of our

giving ourselves up to that Man, who bestows upon us the Characters and

Qualities of others; which perhaps suit us as ill and were as little

design'd for our wearing, as their Cloaths. Instead of going out of our

own complectional Nature into that of others, twere a better and more

laudable Industry to improve our own, and instead of a miserable Copy

become a good Original; for there is no Temper, no Disposition so rude

and untractable, but may in its own peculiar Cast and Turn be brought to

some agreeable Use in Conversation, or in the Affairs of Life. A Person

of a rougher Deportment, and less tied up to the usual Ceremonies of

Behaviour, will, like _Manly_ in the Play,[1] please by the Grace which

Nature gives to every Action wherein she is complied with; the Brisk and

Lively will not want their Admirers, and even a more reserved and

melancholy Temper may at some times be agreeable.

When there is not Vanity enough awake in a Man to undo him, the

Flatterer stirs up that dormant Weakness, and inspires him with Merit

enough to be a Coxcomb. But if Flattery be the most sordid Act that can

be complied with, the Art of Praising justly is as commendable: For tis

laudable to praise well; as Poets at one and the same time give

Immortality, and receive it themselves for a Reward: Both are pleased,

the one whilst he receives the Recompence of Merit, the other whilst he

shews he knows now to discern it; but above all, that Man is happy in

this Art, who, like a skilful Painter, retains the Features and

Complection, but still softens the Picture into the most agreeable

Likeness.

There can hardly, I believe, be imagin'd a more desirable Pleasure, than

that of Praise unmix'd with any Possibility of Flattery. Such was that

which _Germanicus_ enjoyed, when, the Night before a Battle, desirous of

some sincere Mark of the Esteem of his Legions for him, he is described

by _Tacitus_ listening in a Disguise to the Discourse of a Soldier, and

wrapt up in the Fruition of his Glory, whilst with an undesigned

Sincerity they praised his noble and majestick Mien, his Affability, his

Valour, Conduct, and Success in War. How must a Man have his Heart

full-blown with Joy in such an Article of Glory as this? What a Spur and

Encouragement still to proceed in those Steps which had already brought

him to so pure a Taste of the greatest of mortal Enjoyments?

It sometimes happens, that even Enemies and envious Persons bestow the

sincerest Marks of Esteem when they least design it. Such afford a

greater Pleasure, as extorted by Merit, and freed from all Suspicion of

Favour or Flattery. Thus it is with _Malvolio_; he has Wit, Learning,

and Discernment, but temper'd with an Allay of Envy, Self-Love and

Detraction: _Malvolio_ turns pale at the Mirth and good Humour of the

Company, if it center not in his Person; he grows jealous and displeased

when he ceases to be the only Person admired, and looks upon the

Commendations paid to another as a Detraction from his Merit, and an

Attempt to lessen the Superiority he affects; but by this very Method,

he bestows such Praise as can never be suspected of Flattery. His

Uneasiness and Distastes are so many sure and certain Signs of anothers

Title to that Glory he desires, and has the Mortification to find

himself not possessed of.

A good Name is fitly compared to a precious Ointment,[2] and when we are

praised with Skill and Decency, tis indeed the most agreeable Perfume,

but if too strongly admitted into a Brain of a less vigorous and happy

Texture, twill, like too strong an Odour, overcome the Senses, and

prove pernicious to those Nerves twas intended to refresh. A generous

Mind is of all others the most sensible of Praise and Dispraise; and a

noble Spirit is as much invigorated with its due Proportion of Honour

and Applause, as tis depressed by Neglect and Contempt: But tis only

Persons far above the common Level who are thus affected with either of

these Extreams; as in a Thermometer, tis only the purest and most

sublimated Spirit that is either contracted or dilated by the Benignity

or Inclemency of the Season.

Mr. SPECTATOR,

The Translations which you have lately given us from the _Greek_, in

some of your last Papers, have been the Occasion of my looking into

some of those Authors; among whom I chanced on a Collection of Letters

which pass under the Name of _Aristaenetus_. Of all the Remains of

Antiquity, I believe there can be Nothing produc'd of an Air so

gallant and polite; each Letter contains a little Novel or Adventure,

which is told with all the Beauties of Language and heightened with a

Luxuriance of Wit. There are several of them translated,[3] but with

such wide Deviations from the Original, and in a Style so far

differing from the Authors, that the Translator seems rather to have

taken Hints for the expressing his own Sense and Thoughts, than to

have endeavoured to render those of _Aristænetus_. In the following

Translation, I have kept as near the Meaning of the _Greek_ as I

could, and have only added a few Words to make the Sentences in

_English_ fit together a little better than they would otherwise have

done. The Story seems to be taken from that of _Pygmalion_ and the

Statue in _Ovid_: Some of the Thoughts are of the same Turn, and the

whole is written in a kind of Poetical Prose.

Philopinax to Chromation.

"Never was Man more overcome with so fantastical a Passion as mine.

I have painted a beautiful Woman, and am despairing, dying for the

Picture. My own Skill has undone me; tis not the Dart of _Venus_,

but my own Pencil has thus wounded me. Ah me! with what Anxiety am I

necessitated to adore my own Idol? How miserable am I, whilst every

one must as much pity the Painter as he praises the Picture, and own

my Torment more than equal to my Art. But why do I thus complain?

Have there not been more unhappy and unnatural Passions than mine?

Yes, I have seen the Representations of _Phædra, Narcissus,_ and

_Pasiphæ_. _Phædra_ was unhappy in her Love; that of _Pasiphæ_ was

monstrous; and whilst the other caught at his beloved Likeness, he

destroyed the watery Image, which ever eluded his Embraces. The

Fountain represented _Narcissus_ to himself, and the Picture both

that and him, thirsting after his adored Image. But I am yet less

unhappy, I enjoy her Presence continually, and if I touch her, I

destroy not the beauteous Form, but she looks pleased, and a sweet

Smile sits in the charming Space which divides her Lips. One would

swear that Voice and Speech were issuing out, and that ones Ears

felt the melodious Sound. How often have I, deceived by a Lovers

Credulity, hearkned if she had not something to whisper me? and when

frustrated of my Hopes, how often have I taken my Revenge in Kisses

from her Cheeks and Eyes, and softly wooed her to my Embrace, whilst

she (as to me it seem'd) only withheld her Tongue the more to

inflame me. But, Madman that I am, shall I be thus taken with the

Representation only of a beauteous Face, and flowing Hair, and thus

waste myself and melt to Tears for a Shadow? Ah, sure tis something

more, tis a Reality! for see her Beauties shine out with new

Lustre, and she seems to upbraid me with such unkind Reproaches. Oh

may I have a living Mistress of this Form, that when I shall compare

the Work of Nature with that of Art, I may be still at a loss which

to choose, and be long perplex'd with the pleasing Uncertainty.

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 77 / 384 题