No. 236. Friday, November 30, 1711. Steele

--Dare Jura maritis.

Hor.

_Mr_. SPECTATOR,

You have not spoken in so direct a manner upon the Subject of

Marriage as that important Case deserves. It would not be improper to

observe upon the Peculiarity in the Youth of _Great Britain_, of

railing and laughing at that Institution; and when they fall into it,

from a profligate Habit of Mind, being insensible of the [Satisfaction

[1]] in that Way of Life, and treating their Wives with the most

barbarous Disrespect.

Particular Circumstances and Cast of Temper, must teach a Man the

Probability of mighty Uneasinesses in that State, (for unquestionably

some there are whose very Dispositions are strangely averse to

conjugal Friendship;) but no one, I believe, is by his own natural

Complexion prompted to teaze and torment another for no Reason but

being nearly allied to him: And can there be any thing more base, or

serve to sink a Man so much below his own distinguishing

Characteristick, (I mean Reason) than returning Evil for Good in so

open a Manner, as that of treating an helpless Creature with

Unkindness, who has had so good an Opinion of him as to believe what

he said relating to one of the greatest Concerns of Life, by

delivering her Happiness in this World to his Care and Protection?

Must not that Man be abandoned even to all manner of Humanity, who can

deceive a Woman with Appearances of Affection and Kindness, for no

other End but to torment her with more Ease and Authority? Is any

Thing more unlike a Gentleman, than when his Honour is engaged for the

performing his Promises, because nothing but that can oblige him to

it, to become afterwards false to his Word, and be alone the Occasion

of Misery to one whose Happiness he but lately pretended was dearer to

him than his own? Ought such a one to be trusted in his common

Affairs? or treated but as one whose Honesty consisted only in his

Incapacity of being otherwise?

There is one Cause of this Usage no less absurd than common, which

takes place among the more unthinking Men: and that is the Desire to

appear to their Friends free and at Liberty, and without those

Trammels they have so much ridiculed. [To avoid [2]] this they fly

into the other Extream, and grow Tyrants that they may seem Masters.

Because an uncontroulable Command of their own Actions is a certain

Sign of entire Dominion, they wont so much as recede from the

Government even in one Muscle, of their Faces. A kind Look they

believe would be fawning, and a civil Answer yielding the Superiority.

To this must we attribute an Austerity they betray in every Action:

What but this can put a Man out of Humour in his Wife's Company, tho

he is so distinguishingly pleasant every where else? The Bitterness of

his Replies, and the Severity of his Frowns to the tenderest of Wives,

clearly demonstrate, that an ill-grounded Fear of being thought too

submissive, is at the Bottom of this, as I am willing to call it,

affected Moroseness; but if it be such only, put on to convince his

Acquaintance of his entire Dominion, let him take Care of the

Consequence, which will be certain, and worse than the present Evil;

his seeming Indifference will by Degrees grow into real Contempt, and

if it doth not wholly alienate the Affections of his Wife for ever

from him, make both him and her more miserable than if it really did

so.

However inconsistent it may appear, to be thought a well-bred Person

has no small Share in this clownish Behaviour: A Discourse therefore

relating to good Breeding towards a loving and a tender Wife, would be

of great Use to this Sort of Gentlemen. Could you but once convince

them, that to be civil at least is not beneath the Character of a

Gentleman, nor even tender Affection towards one who would make it

reciprocal, betrays any Softness or Effeminacy that the most masculine

Disposition need be ashamed of; could you satisfy them of the

Generosity of voluntary Civility, and the Greatness of Soul that is

conspicuous in Benevolence without immediate Obligations; could you

recommend to Peoples Practice the Saying of the Gentleman quoted in

one of your Speculations, _That he thought it incumbent upon him to

make the Inclinations of a Woman of Merit go along with her Duty_:

Could you, I say, perswade these Men of the Beauty and Reasonableness

of this Sort of Behaviour, I have so much Charity for some of them at

least, to believe you would convince them of a Thing they are only

ashamed to allow: Besides, you would recommend that State in its

truest, and consequently its most agreeable Colours; and the Gentlemen

who have for any Time been such professed Enemies to it, when Occasion

should serve, would return you their Thanks for assisting their

Interest in prevailing over their Prejudices. Marriage in general

would by this Means be a more easy and comfortable Condition; the

Husband would be no where so well satisfied as in his own Parlour, nor

the Wife so pleasant as in the Company of her Husband: A Desire of

being agreeable in the Lover would be increased in the Husband, and

the Mistress be more amiable by becoming the Wife. Besides all which,

I am apt to believe we should find the Race of Men grow wiser as their

Progenitors grew kinder, and the Affection of the Parents would be

conspicuous in the Wisdom of their Children; in short, Men would in

general be much better humoured than they are, did not they so

frequently exercise the worst Turns of their Temper where they ought

to exert the best.

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 74 / 384 题