ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

_Monday, May 12th_.--Lord FRENCH'S newspaper revelations were brought

to the notice of Mr. CHURCHILL, who adduced the cases of the late

Lords WOLSELEY and ROBERTS as evidence that Field-marshals, when

unemployed, have always been allowed considerable freedom of

criticism. The fact that Lord FRENCH is Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland and

(nominal) Commander-in-Chief of the considerable army employed in that

country makes no difference; but ordinary serving officers are still

subject to the Regulations and will take FRENCH leave at their peril.

In the course of a further discussion on milk--prices, about which the

West Country is still up in arms, Mr. MCCURDY dropped the remark that

it was impossible to control cream, owing, no doubt, to its notorious

insurrectionary tendencies; and Colonel WEIGALL removed a load of

suspicion from some of our minds by the emphatic declaration that "a

cow was not a pump, of which the supply could be turned off or on as

one liked."

The FIRST COMMISSIONER OF WORKS was not very hopeful about the removal

of the buildings which disfigure the Parks. The most he could say

was that he was doing his best to get the camouflage school out of

Kensington Gardens, and let nature have a chance.

_Tuesday, May 13th_.--The Lords defeated the Government by inserting

in the Ministry of Health Bill a provision that the new Minister

should have only one Parliamentary Secretary. In vain Lord SANDHURST

protested that the amendment would tie the PRIME MINISTER'S hands.

Lord MIDLETON was delighted to think that it would. Lord CREWE

declared that the creation of minor Ministers was becoming a disease

(possibly the Ministry of Health will include it among "notifiable"

epidemics?). Lord BLEDISLOE quoted the old tag about big fleas and

little fleas. But after all there must be some check to the inveterate

tendency to somnolence in the public offices.

When the Ways and Communications Bill was before the Commons the

Minister-Designate buttressed his case with the alarming statement

that there would be a deficit of one hundred millions this year on the

working of the railways. Members were therefore surprised to find in

the Budget that only sixty millions was provided to meet it. Even

in these days a discrepancy of forty millions does not pass entirely

unnoticed. When taxed with it, Mr. CHAMBERLAIN said he thought it was

due to Government traffic not having been allowed for in the original

calculation, but advised his questioner to ask Sir ERIC GEDDES to

explain. For some reason--can it be the formidable appearance of the

GEDDES chin?--Sir JOSEPH WALTON did not seem greatly pleased at the

prospect.

Like many another Chief Secretary before him, Mr. IAN MACPHERSON, who

reappeared in the House after a long absence in Ireland, had to

figure with a scourge in one hand and an olive branch in the other.

At Question-time he was the stern upholder of law and order, obliged

within the last few days to suspend a seditious newspaper and to

surround the Dublin Mansion House with soldiers. A few moments later

he was moving the Second Reading of a most generous Housing Bill,

under which Irish Corporations will be enabled to build thousands of

dwellings largely at the expense of the general taxpayer.

[Illustration: FAILING TO DIFFER.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, May 21, 1919 · 第 26 / 40 题