To what an illogical position we are driven by our fetish worship of

college 'amateur athletics'! We especially provide the summer vacation

as a period for play and recreation, and as a time when a majority of

students must earn a part of the expenses of the college year. For these

purposes we suspend all classes. Yet the student who uses this vacation

to play ball and thereby earn some money must either lie about it or be

condemned to outer darkness. There are no intercollegiate athletics for

him; he has become a 'professional.' It matters not how fine his ideals

of sport may be, how strong his character, or how high his scholarship.

These considerations are ignored. The honors all go to the athlete who

neglects his studies in order to make games his supreme interest during

that part of the twelve months which is specifically set apart for

studies.

Far more sensible would be an arrangement whereby, if we must have

intercollegiate athletics at all, the games could be scheduled in

vacation periods, and a part of the gate-receipts, if we must have them

at all, could be used for the necessary living expenses of worthy

students, instead of being squandered, as much of that money is

squandered to-day. That this will seem a preposterous plan to those who

are caught in the maelstrom of the present collegiate system need not

surprise us. An accurate record of the history of intercollegiate

athletics shows that, year in and year out, the arrangements desired by

students are those that interfere most seriously with study during the

days especially intended for study.

The maelstrom of college athletics! That would not seem too strong a

term if we could view the age in which we live in right perspective--an

age so unbalanced nervously that it demands perpetual excitement. We

have fallen into a vicious circle: the excesses of excitement create a

pathological nervous condition which craves greater excesses. The

advertisement of a head-on collision of two locomotives is said to have

drawn the largest crowd in the history of modern 'sport'; next in

attractiveness is an intercollegiate football game. It is unfortunate

that our universities, which should serve as balancing forces,--which

should inculcate the ideal of sport as a counterpoise to an overwrought

civilization,--are actually making conditions worse through cultivating,

by means of athletics as a business, that passion for excitement which

makes sustained thinking impossible and which is elsewhere kept at fever

heat by prize-fights, bullfights, and blood-curdling motion pictures.

V

But even if intercollegiate games are detrimental to the interests of

scholarship, is not the college spirit they create worth all they cost?

Perhaps so. A university is more than a curriculum and a campus. It is

more than the most elaborate student annual can depict. Even in

Carlyle's day, it was more than he called it: a true university was

never a mere 'collection of books.' It is the spirit that giveth life,

and 'college spirit' is certainly a name to conjure with. The first

question is what we mean by college spirit. A student may throw his hat

in the air, grab a megaphone, give 'three long rahs,' go through the

gymnastics of a cheer-leader,--putting the most ingenious mechanical

toys to shame,--and yet leave some doubt whether he has adequately

defined college spirit.

What is this college spirit that hovers over the paid coach and his

grandstand--this 'indefinable something,' as one writer calls it, 'which

is fanned into a bright flame by intercollegiate athletics'? Shall we

judge the spirit by its manifestations in an institution famed above all

else for its winning teams and its college spirit? In such an

institution, not long ago, every student was cudgeled or cajoled into

'supporting the team,' and many a callow youth acted as though he

thought he had reached the heights of self-sacrifice when he sat for

hours on the grandstand, watching practice, puffing innumerable

cigarettes, and laying up a stock of canned enthusiasm for the big game.

A student who would not support his team by betting on it was regarded

as deficient in spirit. Every intercollegiate game was the occasion of

general neglect of college courses. If the game was at a neighboring

city, the class-rooms were half empty for two days; but the bar-rooms of

that city were not empty, and worse places regularly doubled their rates

on the night of a big game. Some of the most enthusiastic supporters of

the team went to jail for disturbing the peace. If the contest took

place at home, returning alumni filled the fraternity houses and

celebrated with general drunkenness. 'An indefinable something'--consisting

of college property and that of private citizens--was 'fanned into a

bright flame' in celebration of the victory. Following this came the

spectacle of young men parading the streets in nightshirts. For

residents of the town who did not enjoy this particular kind of spirit,

the night was made hideous by the noises of revelry. All this and much

more was tolerated for years on the assumption that students, imbued

with college spirit, should not be subjected to the laws of decent

living that govern those members of civilized communities who have not

had the advantages of a higher education. The most serious difficulties

between faculties and students and between students and the police, the

country over, for the past twenty years, have arisen in connection with

displays of 'college spirit' after the 'big game.' Any college and any

community might cheerfully sacrifice this kind of college spirit.

But some men mean by college spirit something finer than lawlessness,

dissipation, and rowdyism. They mean the loyalty to an institution which

makes a student guard its good name by being manly and courteous in

conduct at all times and in all places. They mean the sense of

responsibility which aids a student in forming habits of temperance and

industry. They mean that eagerness to make a grateful use of his

opportunities which leads a student to keep his own body fit, through

moderate athletics, and a physical training that knows no season--is

never broken. By college spirit some men mean this and far more: they

mean that loyalty to a college which rivets a man to the severest tasks

of scholarship, through which he gains intellectual power and

enthusiasm, without which no graduate is an entire credit to any

college; and finally they mean that vision of an ideal life beyond

Commencement which shows a man that only through the rigid

subordination of transient and trivial pleasures can he hope to become

the only great victory a university ever wins--a trained, devoted, and

inspired alumnus, working for the welfare of mankind. There is no

evidence that the intercollegiate athletics of to-day inculcate in many

men this kind of college spirit.

Have I exaggerated the evils of intercollegiate athletics? Possibly I

have. Exceptions should be cited here and there. But I am convinced that

college faculties agree with me in my main contentions. My impression is

that at least three fourths of the teachers I have met the country over

believe that the American college would better serve its highest

purposes, if intercollegiate athletics were no more. At a recent dinner

of ten deans and presidents, they declared, one by one, in confidence,

that they would abolish intercollegiate athletics if they could

withstand the pressure of students and alumni.

Is it therefore necessary for all institutions to give up

intercollegiate athletics permanently? Probably not. Let our colleges

first adopt whatever measures may be necessary to make athletics yield

their educational values to all students and teachers. If

intercollegiate athletics can then be conducted as incidental and

contributory to the main purposes of athletics, well and good. But first

of all the question must be decisively settled, which aims are to

dominate--those of business or those of education. And it will be

difficult for a college already in the clutches of commercialism to

retain the system and at the same time cultivate a spirit antagonistic

to it. Probably the quicker and surer way would be to suspend all

intercollegiate athletics for a college generation by agreement of

groups of colleges--during which period every effort should be made to

establish the tradition of athletics for education. If an institution

could not survive such a period of transition, it is a fair question

whether the institution has any reason for survival.

Typically American though our frantic devotion to intercollegiate

athletics may be, we shall not long tolerate a system which provides

only a costly, injurious, and excessive regime of physical training for

a few students, especially those who need it least. The call to-day is

for inexpensive, healthful, and moderate exercise for all students,

especially those who need it most. Colleges must sooner or later heed

that call: their athletics must be for education, not for business.

[Illustration]

Car-Window Botany

By Lida F. Baldwin

One thinks of the botanist as in silence and solitude wandering by some

forest brook, or penetrating into almost impenetrable swamps, or

climbing rocky mountain paths, lured on by the hope of finding some rare

and curious flower. But I in my own experience have had some of my best

finds from the windows of a railway train.

It was with people sitting all around me, and the engine puffing noisily

away on an up grade, that my delighted eyes first fell on the

one-flowered pyrola. The railway cutting had been made in the heart of

the deep forest, and as the bank settled down, some of the rarer and

shyer forest growths, such as ground-pine, arbutus, and pyrola, in the

course of years had slipped over the brink of the cutting and were now

part way down the bank. Inside the car were tired and grimy faces; just

a few feet outside were forest freshness and greenness, and the white

blossoms of the pyrola with their delicate flush.

Sometimes there is no bank on either side of the railway, and from the

car window one catches glimpses into the edges of forests, or looks

down upon swamps and small clear ponds, or gazes across broad level

meadows; but more often one's view from the car window is confined to

the narrow ditch of water just beyond the road-bed and to the sides of

the cutting just beyond the ditch. Even in that confined outlook there

are always possibilities; and it was in just such a ditch of water, as

our train slowed up on the outskirts of Buffalo, that I saw growing

great numbers of what looked like miniature calla lilies. There were the

same golden, erect spadix, and the same ivory-white spathe rolled back

in the very curve of the spathe of the calla lily; but the flower was

not one quarter the size of the calla. As usual my botany was in my

handbag; and the temptation to make a quick dash from the train, to try

to secure one specimen for analysis, was almost irresistible. But I did

resist the temptation; for the bank was quite steep, and I never could

have climbed back in time if the train had started while I was trying to

secure my flower; and a lonely woman would have been left in the dusk,

watching the train bearing her friends vanish in the deepening twilight.

But the small white beauties were never forgotten, and years afterwards

I found the flower, _arum palustris_, growing in a swamp not many miles

from my old home.

One July day I traveled from Quebec to Portland on the slowest of

trains. The road ran for much of the way, first on one side, then on

the other, of the Chaudiere River, but never far out of sight of its

clear brown waters. Fortunately for me, our locomotive used wood for

fuel, and consequently every few hours we would stop at some great

woodpile in a forest clearing while the trainmen threw a fresh supply of

wood into the tender; and some of the passengers took advantage of the

stop to make short explorations into the forest. About mid-day, as we

were riding slowly along, I began to notice a pink-purple flower that

was new to me, growing here and there in rather marshy places. Shortly

after I had first seen the flower the added slowness of the train showed

that we were coming to another woodpile. The instant the train stopped I

was out of the cars, over the low rail fence, and picking my way

carefully from grassy hummock to grassy hummock; and soon I had found a

specimen. Upon analysis it proved to be calopogon, familiar to all New

Englanders from childhood, but new to my Ohio eyes.

I have never made any formal herbarium, and the only botanical record I

have ever kept consists of the date and place of my first seeing the

flower written opposite its scientific name in the margin of the pages

of my old school-girl's copy of Gray's Botany. But that is the only

record one needs to whom all the flowers one knows are either old

friends or new acquaintances--in either case distinct individuals.

Often, as I have been turning the pages of the old botany in a bit of

analyzing, I have stopped at the page on which is written, opposite the

scientific name of the calopogon, 'Saint Henry's, Canada, July 11,

1884'; and across the more than twenty years that lie between, I smell

once more the balsam of the Canadian forest, and see the amber-brown

waters of the Chaudiere River, and hear the shouts of the trainmen as

they throw the great sticks of wood up to the tender; and giving color

to all this mental picture is the pink-purple blossom of the calopogon.

But all trains do not have the accommodating habit of stopping for wood

just after you have seen a strange flower; in that case, all that you

can do is, take the best mental landmarks you can, and then at the first

opportunity go back for your specimen. One summer I was going down on

the express from Philadelphia to Cape May. As you near the coast the

road runs through very level country, and between the railway and the

pine wood lies a strip of marshy ground about forty feet wide. Each

year, as I go back to the sea-coast, I watch eagerly for my first sight

of the two characteristic flowers of the Jersey coast, the swamp mallow

and the sabbatia. On this particular morning I had already seen many of

the great mallows with their rose-pink flowers, so like those of the

hollyhock that not even the most careless eye can fail to notice the

family resemblance; and I had welcomed them as a sure sign of the

fast-nearing seashore.

Now, with my face, as usual, close to the window, I was watching the

sparse marsh-grass most narrowly to see if I could detect amidst it the

pink star-shaped flower of the sabbatia. Suddenly the marsh-grass was

set thick with spikes of yellow flowers, just rising above the level of

the grass. There was only that one hurried look as the train went by;

but from that look I felt almost certain of two things: the first was

that I had never seen that flower before, and the second, that it must

be close of kin to an old flower friend of mine, the white

fringed-orchis.

Then and there I determined to get that flower, and the first thing was

to make sure of its location. At first this seemed almost hopeless,

since for miles back we had had that narrow strip of marsh-grass flanked

by the unchanging pine woods; but in a few minutes our road passed under

another railway; here was one landmark, and in a couple of minutes more

we went past a way-station slowly enough for me to read the name on the

board; now I knew that I could find my plant. The next day we took one

of the local trains from Cape May, got off at the station whose name I

had read, and started down the track. After a walk of a mile we passed

under that other railroad; and about two miles farther down the track I

saw again the yellow spikes of the flowers barely o'er-topping the

grass.

It had been a hot July morning with a sultry land breeze blowing, and as

we walked the three miles down the unshaded track, we had weariedly and

unavailingly slapped at mosquitoes at every step. All of these

discomforts together had not daunted my courage; but the swarms of

mosquitoes that arose buzzing at my first step into the marsh-grass made

me draw back to the comparative security of the railway track, with the

feeling that no flower could repay one for facing those swarms. A second

look at the yellow flowers growing not thirty feet away gave me fresh

courage and I started again. I was as quick as possible; but when I was

back once more on the track, this time with my hands full of the

flowers, face and hands and arms were one mass of blotches from the

mosquito bites.

Upon analysis the flower proved to be the yellow fringed-orchis, the

handsomest species of its genus, and the one most closely allied to the

white fringed-orchis. Our train had been running about forty miles an

hour; I had never even known that there was a yellow orchid, but in that

one quick glance from the express train the unmistakable family look of

the orchis had shown.

Success and pleasure in car-window botany depend not so much on a

scientific knowledge of structural details as on the ability of the eye

to recognize at a glance the characteristic effect produced by a mass of

details. It is this ability which enables you to be sure that you

recognize the faces of old flower friends in the hurried glance cast

from the window; which enables you to tell with certainty gray-blue

clump of houstonias from gray-blue clump of hepaticas, wind-swept bank

of purplish phlox from wind-swept bank of wild geranium; and it is that

same ability to recognize the characteristic effect produced by a group

of structural details which enables one to place without analysis the

new flower in the right family.

I have always been secretly very proud of the certainty with which at

the first sight of the yellow flower I felt that it was an orchis, but

all my feeling in connection with it is not that of pleasure. Certain

flowers always recall to me certain sounds; in most cases the sound

associated with a flower is the one heard at the time at which I first

saw the flower; and to this day, with the thought of the yellow

fringed-orchis is inseparably joined that most persistent and irritating

of sounds, the buzzing of the mosquito.

But the true history of a car-window botanist is not always a record of

successful achievement, of the triumphant finding of his flower; he also

has his haunting disappointments, his glimpses of strange flowers which

he is never afterwards able to place. One July day, riding through

northern New Hampshire, I saw just over the fence at the edge of the

woods a tall plant--evidently some kind of a lily. It bore a single dark

orange-red flower, which did not droop as do the flowers of the meadow

lily, but stood stiffly erect. I have never seen that lily since; though

never does a July come, especially if it is to be spent in a new place,

that I do not think, 'Maybe this year I shall find my lily.' Perhaps,

after all, such experiences are not to be classed with the

disappointments either of life or of car-window botany--is it not rather

true that to both they give zest and expectancy?

The charm of such botanizing is not alone in finding or in hoping to

find some new flower: even more enduring is the pleasure that comes from

the recognition of the faces of old friends in new surroundings. An

April day's journey was made one long pleasure; for the swamplike ditch

just below the road-bed shone golden with the intense yellow of the

marsh-marigold, an old friend from my earliest childhood; and when the

railway ran half-way up a hillside, I spied, amid the dead leaves of

last year, the little clumps of the clustering blue hepaticas, and

recognized even in those fleeting glances the singularly starry effect

produced by the numerous white stamens; and as the train crossed over

the creeks, that flow over rocky bottoms from out the hemlock woods, I

saw in the opening up of the creek bed the June-berry trees in showers

of white bloom, looking doubly white against the dark green of the

hemlocks, just as I had seen them the day before in the hemlock woods of

Mill Creek at my own home.

One of the keenest pleasures of the railway botanist comes from his

enjoyment of the massed color of great quantities of flowers of the same

kind. One morning our train was running along through the level Jersey

country; it was at that wretched hour of the morning when you have just

taken your place in someone else's seat while the porter is getting your

own ready, and you have that all-over miserable feeling that comes from

a night's ride in a stuffy sleeper. In an instant all discomfort was

forgotten in the sight of a wide salt meadow which seemed one mass of

the pink swamp-mallows. The gray morning mist was turned silvery white

by the rising sun, and giving color to it all were the wide stretches of

the flowers. It was all one shimmering mass of misty silvery-gray,

sunlight radiance, and rose-color as delicate as that of the lining of

some seashells.

Once again, this time on one of our home roads near Pittsburg, I felt

the beauty of the color of great masses of flowers. The railway runs

along about half-way up the bluffs by the side of the Beaver River; as

we rounded a curve, the steep bank above me turned suddenly intensely

red with the vivid color of the scarlet campion. Only those who notice

most closely have any idea how rare a color in our wild flowers any

shade of true red is. Nearly all the flowers that are commonly spoken of

as red are in reality purplish pink or reddish lilac. Indeed I know only

two wild flowers whose color is a true red. One of these is the cardinal

lobelia, whose petals are of the darkest, clearest, most velvety red;

and the other flower is the scarlet campion. The color of this latter is

true scarlet, and the river bluff that June morning fairly glowed with

its bloom. It is Holmes who compares the color of the cardinal flower

to that of drops of blood new fallen from a wounded eagle's breast; but

any true comparison for the color of this other flower must be founded

on life, and on life when it is at its fullest of strength and of

enjoyment.

Even the most ardent of car-window botanists will not claim that the

only place from which the beauty of the color of flowers in mass can be

appreciated is the window of a railway train. To all there come memories

of fitful spring days when in long country drives they have seen partly

worn-out meadows and barren hillsides turned to the softest blue-gray

mist by the delicate color of countless blossoms of houstonia. And as

they drove slowly along the partly dried, muddy roads of mid-April the

effect of every varying phase of the spring weather on the massed color

sank slowly into their consciousness. They had time to notice how blue

was the color-mist lying on the sheltered meadows in the sunshine, and

how coldly gray it grew as it crept up the hillsides across which the

chill spring wind was blowing.

And if one lives in a country where there are chestnut ridges, one looks

forward through all the spring to that one week of late June and

earliest July when the chestnut trees will be in bloom. The long

staminate flowers of the chestnut are a soft cream-yellow with a

greenish tint; and on the ridges where the trees grow in abundance the

great irregular masses of their blossoming tops do not stand out

against their background of the dark green foliage of midsummer, but

blend softly with it, giving to all such an indescribable effect of

lightness and airiness that the whole wooded ridge seems not to be

fastened securely to the earth, but to be floating cloud-like above it.

During that one week of the chestnut-blossoming one stops at door or at

window in the midst of the early morning work to watch for the moment

when the first rays of the rising sun, falling on the cream-yellow of

the chestnut tops, turn them into their own deep gold; and at the

restful close of day one lingers on the doorstep through the long June

twilight till their blossoming tops can no longer be distinguished from

the dark foliage of the other trees in the gathering darkness.

Atlantic Classics, Second Series · 第 9 / 17 段