THE SOIL--ITS CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERS.
No department of agricultural chemistry is surrounded with greater
difficulties and uncertainties than that relating to the properties of
the soil. When chemistry began to be applied to agriculture, it was not
unnaturally supposed that the examination of the soil would enable us to
ascertain with certainty the mode in which it might be most
advantageously improved and cultivated, and when, as occasionally
happened, analysis revealed the absence of one or more of the essential
constituents of the plant in a barren soil, it indicated at once the
cause and the cure of the defect. But the expectations naturally formed
from the facts then observed have been as yet very partially fulfilled;
for, as our knowledge has advanced, it has become apparent that it is
only in rare instances that it is possible satisfactorily to connect
together the composition and the properties of a soil, and with each
advancement in the accuracy and minuteness of our analysis the
difficulties have been rather increased than diminished. Although it is
occasionally possible to predicate from its composition that a
particular soil will be incapable of supporting vegetation, it not
unfrequently happens that a fruitful and a barren soil are so similar
that it is impossible to distinguish them from one another, and cases
even occur in which the barren appears superior to the fertile soil. The
cause of this apparently anomalous phenomenon lies in the fact that
analysis, however minute, is unable to disclose all the conditions of
fertility, and that it must be supplemented by an examination of its
physical and other chemical properties, which are not indicated by
ordinary experiments. Of late years very considerable progress has been
made in the investigation of the properties of the soil, and many facts
of great importance have been discovered, but we are still unable to
assert that all the conditions of fertility are yet known, and the
practical application of those recently discovered is still very
imperfectly understood.
It must not be supposed that a careful analysis of a soil is without
value, for very important practical deductions may often be drawn from
it, and when this is not practicable it is not unfrequently due to its
being imperfect or incomplete, for it is so complex that the cases in
which all the necessary details have been eliminated are even now by no
means numerous. In fact, the want of a large number of thorough analyses
of soils of different kinds is a matter of some difficulty, and so soon
as a satisfactory mode of investigation can be determined upon, a full
examination of this subject would be of much importance.
_Origin of Soils._--The constituents of the soil, like those of the
plant, may be divided into the great classes of organic and inorganic.
The origin of the former has been already discussed: they are derived
from the decay of plants which have already grown upon the soil, and
which, in various stages of decomposition, form the numerous class of
substances grouped together under the name of humus. The organic
substances may therefore be considered as in a manner secondary
constituents of the soil, which have been accumulated in it as the
consequence of the growth and decay of successive generations of plants,
while the primeval soil consisted of inorganic substances only.
The inorganic constituents of the soil are obtained as the result of a
succession of chemical changes going on in the rocks which protrude
through the surface of the earth. We have only to examine one of these
rocks to observe that it is constantly undergoing a series of important
changes. Under the influence of air and moisture, aided by the powerful
agency of frost, it is seen to become soft, and gradually to
disintegrate, until it is finally converted into an uniform powder, in
which the structure of the original rock is with difficulty, if at all
distinguishable. The rapidity with which these changes take place is
very variable; in the harder rocks, such as granite and mica slate it is
so slow as to be scarcely perceptible, while in others, such as the
shales of the coal formation, a very few years' exposure is sufficient
for the purpose. These actions, operating through a long series of
years, are the source of the inorganic constituents of all soils.
Geology points to a period at which the earth's surface must have been
altogether devoid of soil, and have consisted entirely of hard
crystalline rocks, such as granite and trap, by the disintegration of
which, slowly proceeding from the creation down to the present time, all
the soils which now cover the surface have been formed. But they have
been produced by a succession of very complicated processes; for these
disintegrated rocks being washed away in the form of fine mud, or at
least of minute particles, and being deposited at the bottom of the
primeval seas, have there hardened into what are called sedimentary
rocks, which being raised above the surface by volcanic action or other
great geological forces, have been again disintegrated to yield
different soils. Thus, then, all soils are directly or indirectly
derived from the crystalline rocks, those overlying them being formed
immediately by their decomposition, while those found above the
sedimentary rocks may be traced back through them to the crystalline
rocks from which they were originally formed.
Such being the case, the composition of different soils must manifestly
depend on that of the crystalline rocks from which they have been
derived. Their number is by no means large, and they all consist of
mixtures in variable proportions of quartz, felspar, mica, hornblende,
augite, and zeolites. With the exception of quartz and augite, these
names are, however, representatives of different classes of minerals.
There are, for instance, several different minerals commonly classified
under the name of felspar, which have been distinguished by
mineralogists by the names of orthoclase, albite, oligoclase, and
labradorite; and there are at least two sorts of mica, two of
hornblende, and many varieties of zeolites.
Quartz consists of pure silica, and when in large masses is one of the
most indestructible rocks. It occurs, however, intermixed with other
minerals in small crystals, or irregular fragments, and forms the entire
mass of pure sand.
The four kinds of felspar which have been already named are compounds of
silica with alumina, and another base which is either potash, soda, or
lime. Their composition is as follows, two examples of each being
given--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Orthoclase. | Albite. | Oligoclase. | Labradorite. |
------------------|--------------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
Silica | 65.72| 65.00| 67.99| 68.23| 62.70| 63.51| 54.66| 54.67|
Alumina | 18.57| 18.64| 19.61| 18.30| 23.80| 23.09| 27.87| 27.89|
Peroxide of iron | traces| 0.83| 0.70| 1.01| 0.62| -- | -- | 0.31|
Oxide of manganese| traces| 0.13| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lime | 0.34| 1.23| 0.66| 1.26| 4.60| 2.44| 12.01| 10.60|
Magnesia | 0.10| 1.03| -- | 0.51| 0.02| 0.77| -- | 0.18|
Potash | 14.02| 9.12| -- | 2.53| 1.05| 2.19| -- | 0.49|
Soda | 1.25| 3.49| 11.12| 7.99| 8.00| 9.37| 5.46| 5.05|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 100.00| 99.47|100.08| 99.83|100.79|101.37|100.00| 99.19 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is obvious that soils produced by the disintegration of these
minerals must differ materially in quality. Those yielded by orthoclase
must generally abound in potash, while albite and labradorite,
containing little or none of that element, must produce soils in which
it is deficient. The quality of the soil they yield is not however
entirely dependent on the nature of the particular felspar which yields
it, but is also intimately connected with the extent to which the
decomposition has advanced. It is observed that different felspars
undergo decomposition with different degrees of rapidity but after a
certain time they all begin to lose their peculiar lustre, acquire a
dull and earthy appearance, and at length fall into a more or less white
and soft powder. During this change water is absorbed, and, by the
decomposing action of the air, the alkaline silicate is gradually
rendered soluble, and at length entirely washed away, leaving a
substance which, when mixed with water, becomes plastic, and has all the
characters of common clay. The nature of this change will be best seen
by the following analysis of the clay produced during this composition,
which is employed in the manufacture of porcelain under the name of
kaolin, or china clay--
Silica 46.80
Alumina 36.83
Peroxide of iron 3.11
Carbonate of lime 0.55
Potash 0.27
Water 12.44
----
100.00
In this instance the decomposition of the felspar had reached its limit,
a mere trace of potash being left, but if taken at different stages of
the process, variable proportions of that alkali are met with. This
decomposition of felspar is the source of the great deposits of clay
which are so abundantly distributed over the globe, and it takes place
with nearly equal rapidity with potash and soda felspar. It is rarely
complete, and the soils produced from it frequently contain a
considerable proportion of the undecomposed mineral, which continues for
a long period to yield a supply of alkalies to the plants which grow on
them.
Mica is a very widely distributed mineral, and two varieties of it are
distinguished by mineralogists, one of which is characterised by the
large quantity of magnesia it contains. Different specimens are found to
vary very greatly in composition, but the following analyses may
represent their most usual composition:
MICA.
|----------------|
Potash. Magnesia.
Silica 46.36 42.65
Alumina 36.80 12.96
Peroxide of iron 4.53 ---
Protoxide of iron --- 7.11
Oxide of manganese 0.02 1.06
Magnesia --- 25.75
Potash 9.22 6.03
Hydrofluoric acid 0.70 0.62
Water 1.84 3.17
---- ----
99.47 99.35
Mica undergoes decomposition with extreme slowness, as is at once
illustrated by the fact that its shining scales may frequently be met
with entirely unchanged in the soil. Its persistence is dependent on the
small quantity of alkaline constituents which it contains; and for this
reason it is observed that the magnesian micas undergo decomposition
less rapidly than those containing the larger quantity of potash.
Eventually, however, both varieties become converted into clay, their
magnesia and potash passing gradually into soluble forms.
Hornblende and augite are two widely distributed minerals, which are so
similar in composition and properties that they may be considered
together. Of the former two varieties, basaltic and common have been
distinguished, and their composition is given below:--
Hornblende.
|----------------|
Common. Basaltic. Augite.
Silica 41.50 42.24 50.12
Alumina 15.75 13.92 4.20
Protoxide of iron 7.75 14.59 11.60
Oxide of manganese 0.25 0.33 --
Lime 14.09 12.24 20.55
Magnesia 19.40 13.74 13.70
Water 0.50 -- --
---- ---- ----
99.24 97.05 99.67
In these minerals alkalies are entirely absent, and their decomposition
is due to the presence of protoxide of iron, which readily absorbs
oxygen from the air, when the magnesia is separated and a ferruginous
clay left.
The minerals just referred to, constitute the great bulk of the mountain
masses, but they are associated with many others which take part in the
formation of the soil. Of these the most important are the zeolites
which do not occur in large masses but are disseminated through the
other rocks in small quantity. They form a large class of minerals of
which Thomsonite and natrolite may be selected as examples--
Thomsonite. Natrolite.
Silica 38.73 48.68
Alumina 30.84 26.36
Lime 13.43 --
Potash 0.54 0.23
Soda 3.85 16.00
Water 13.09 9.55
---- ----
100.48 100.83
They are chiefly characterized by containing their silica in a soluble
state, and hence may yield that substance to the plants in a condition
particularly favourable for absorption.
It is obvious from what has been stated that all these minerals are
capable, by their decomposition, of yielding soft porous masses having
the physical properties of soils, but most of them would be devoid of
many essential ingredients, while not one of them would yield either
phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, or chlorine. It has, however, been
recently ascertained that certain of these minerals, or at least the
rocks formed from them, contain minute, but distinctly appreciable
traces of phosphoric acid, although in too small quantity to be detected
by ordinary analysis; and small quantities of chlorine and sulphuric
acid may also in most instances be found.
Still it will be observed that most of these minerals would yield a soil
containing only two or three of those substances, which, as we have
already learned, are essential to the plant. Thus, potash felspar, while
it would give abundance of potash, would be but an inefficient source
of lime and magnesia; and labradorite, which contains abundance of lime,
is altogether deficient in magnesia and potash.
Nature has, however, provided against this difficulty, for she has so
arranged it that these minerals rarely occur alone, the rocks which form
our great mountain masses being composed of intimate mixtures of two or
more of them, and that in such a manner that the deficiencies of the one
compensate those of the other. We shall shortly mention the composition
of these rocks.
Granite is a mixture of quartz, felspar, and mica in variable
proportions, and the quality of the soil it yields depends on whether
the variety of felspar present be orthoclase or albite. When the former
is the constituent, granite yields soils of tolerable fertility,
provided their climatic conditions be favourable; but it frequently
occurs in high and exposed situations which are unfavourable to the
growth of plants. Gneiss is a similar mixture, but characterised by the
predominance of mica, and by its banded structure. Owing to the small
quantity of felspar which it contains, and the abundance of the
difficulty decomposable mica, the soils formed by its disintegration are
generally inferior. Mica slate is also a mixture of quartz, felspar, and
mica, but consisting almost entirely of the latter ingredient, and
consequently presenting an extreme infertility. The position of the
granite, gneiss, and mica slate soils in this country is such that very
few of them are of much value; but in warm climates they not
unfrequently produce abundant crops of grain. Syenite is a rock similar
in composition to granite, but having the mica replaced by hornblende,
which by its decomposition yields supplies of lime and magnesia more
readily than they can be obtained from the less easily disintegrated
mica. For this reason soils produced from the syenitic rocks are
frequently possessed of considerable fertility.
The series of rocks of which greenstone and trap are types, and which
are very widely distributed, differ greatly in composition from those
already mentioned. They are divisible into two great classes, which have
received the names of diorite and dolerite, the former a mixture of
albite and hornblende, the latter of augite and labradorite, sometimes
with considerable quantities of a sort of oligoclase containing both
soda and lime, and of different kinds of zeolitic minerals. Generally
speaking, the soils produced from diorite are superior to those from
dolerite. The albite which the former contains undergoes a rapid
decomposition, and yields abundance of soda along with some potash,
which is seldom altogether wanting, while the hornblende supplies both
lime and magnesia. Dolerite, when composed entirely of augite and
labradorite, produces rather inferior soils; but when it contains
oligoclase and zeolites, and comes under the head of basalt, its
disintegration is the source of soils remarkable for their fertility;
for these latter substances undergoing rapid decomposition furnish the
plants with abundant supplies of alkalies and lime, while the more
slowly decomposing hornblende affords the necessary quantity of
magnesia. In addition to these, the basaltic rocks are found to contain
appreciable quantities of phosphoric acid, so that they are in a
condition to yield to the plant almost all its necessary constituents.
The different rocks now mentioned, with a few others of less general
distribution, constitute the whole of our great mountain masses; and
while their general composition is such as has been stated, they
frequently contain disseminated through them quantities of other
minerals which, though in trifling quantity, nevertheless add their
quota of valuable constituents to the soils. Moreover, the exact
composition of the minerals of which the great masses of rocks are
composed is liable to some variety. Those which we have taken as
illustrations have been selected as typical of the minerals; but it is
not uncommon to find albite containing 2 or 3 per cent of potash,
labradorite with a considerable proportion of soda, and zeolitic
minerals containing several per cent of potash, the presence of which
must of course considerably modify the properties of the soils produced
from them. They are also greatly affected by the mechanical influences
to which the rocks are exposed; and being situated for the most part in
elevated positions, they are no sooner disintegrated than they are
washed down by the rains. A granite, for instance, as the result of
disintegration, has its felspar reduced to an impalpable powder, while
its quartz and mica remain, the former entirely, the latter in great
part, in the crystalline grains which existed originally in the granite.
If such a disintegrated granite remains on the spot, it is easy to see
what its composition must be; but if exposed to the action of running
water, by which it is washed away from its original site, a process of
separation takes place, the heavy grains of quartz are first deposited,
then the lighter mica, and lastly the felspar. Thus there may be
produced from the same granite, soils of very different nature and
composition, from a pure and barren sand to a rich clay formed entirely
of felspathic debris.
The sedimentary or stratified rocks are formed of particles carried down
by water and deposited at the bottom of the primeval seas from which
they have been upheaved in the course of geological changes. The
process of their formation may be watched at the present day at the
mouths of all great rivers, where a delta composed of the suspended
matters carried down by the waters is slowly formed. The nature of these
rocks must therefore depend entirely on that of the country through
which the river flows. If its course runs through a country in which
lime is abundant, calcareous rocks will be deposited, and if it passes
through districts of different geological characters the deposit must
necessarily consist of a mixture of the disintegrated particles of the
different rocks the river has encountered. For this reason it is
impossible to enter upon a detailed account of their composition. It is
to be observed, however, that the particles of which they are composed,
though originally derived from the crystalline rocks, have generally
undergone a complex series of changes, geology teaching that, after
deposition, they may in their turn undergo disintegration and be carried
away by water, to be again deposited. Their composition must therefore
vary not merely according to the nature of the rock from which they have
been formed, but also according to the extent to which the decomposition
has gone, and the successive changes to which they have been exposed.
They may be reduced to the three great classes of clays, including the
different kinds of clay slates, shales, etc., sandstone and limestone.
It must be added also, that many of them contain carbonaceous matters
produced by the decomposition of early races of plants and animals, and
that mixtures of two or more of the different classes are frequent.
The purest clays are produced by the decomposition of felspar, but
almost all the crystalline rocks may produce them by the removal of
their alkalies, iron, lime, etc. Where circumstances have been
favourable, the whole of these substances are removed, and the clay
which remains consists almost entirely of silica and alumina, and yields
a soil which is almost barren, not merely on account of the deficiency
of many of the necessary elements of plants, but because it is so stiff
and impenetrable that the roots find their way into it with difficulty.
It rarely happens, however, that decomposition has advanced so far as to
remove the whole of the alkalies, which is exemplified by the following
analyses of the fire clay of the coal formation, and of transition clay
slate:--
Transition Fire Clay.
Clay Slate.
Silica 60.03 54.77
Alumina 14.91 28.61
Peroxide of iron 8.94 4.92
Lime 2.08 0.58
Magnesia 4.22 1.14
Potash 3.87 1.00
Soda -- 0.24
Carbonic acid } 5.67 8.24
Water }
---- ----
99.72 99.50
The sandstones are derived from the siliceous particles of granite and
other rocks, and consist in many cases of nearly pure silica, in which
case their disintegration produces a barren sand, but they more
frequently contain an admixture of clay and micaceous scales, which
sometimes form a by no means inconsiderable portion of them. Such
sandstones yield soils of better quality, but they are always light and
poor. Where they occur interstratified with clays, still better soils
are produced, the mutual admixture of the disintegrated rocks affording
a substance of intermediate properties, in which the heaviness of the
clay is tempered by the lightness of the sandstone.
Limestone is one of the most widely distributed of the stratified rocks,
and in different localities occurs of very different composition.
Limestones are divided into two classes, common and magnesian; the
former a nearly pure carbonate of lime, the latter a mixture of that
substance with carbonate of magnesia. But while these are the principal
constituents, it is not uncommon to find small quantities of phosphate
and sulphate of lime, which, however trifling their proportions, are not
unimportant in an agricultural point of view. The following analyses
will serve to illustrate the general composition of these two sorts of
limestone as they occur in the early geological formations:--
COMMON. MAGNESIAN.
|-------------------------| |----------------------|
Mid-Lothian. Sutherland. Sutherland. Dumfries.
Silica 2.00 7.42 6.00 2.31
Peroxide of iron } 0.45 0.76 1.57 2.00
and alumina }
Carbonate of lime 93.61 84.11 50.21 58.81
Carbonate of } 1.62 7.45 41.22 36.41
magnesia }
Phosphate of lime 0.56 ... ... ...
Sulphate of lime 0.92 ... ... 0.10
Organic matter 0.20 ... ... ...
Water 0.50 ... 0.69 ...
---- ---- ---- ----
99.86 99.74 99.69 99.63
These limestones are hard and possess to a greater or less extent a
crystalline texture. They are replaced in later geological periods by
others which are much softer, and often purer, of which the oolitic
limestones, so called from their resemblance to the roe of a fish, and
chalk are the most important. Other limestones are also known which
contain an admixture of clay. The soils produced by the disintegration
of limestone and chalk are generally light and porous, but when mixed
with clay, possess a very high degree of fertility, and this is
particularly the case with chalk, which yields some of the most valuable
of all soils. But it is true only of the common limestones, for
experience has shown that those which contain magnesia in large quantity
are often prejudicial to vegetation, and sometimes yield barren or
inferior soils.
Such are the general characters of the three great classes of stratified
rocks; any attempt to particularise the numerous varieties of each would
lead us far beyond the limits of the present work. It is necessary,
however, to remark, that in many instances one variety passes into the
other, or, more correctly speaking, sedimentary rocks occur, which are
mixtures of two or more of the three great classes. In fact, the name
given to each really expresses only the preponderating ingredient, and
many sandstones contain much clay, shales and clay slates abound in
lime, and limestones in sand or clay, so that it may sometimes be a
matter of some difficulty to decide to which class they belong. Such
mixtures usually produce better soils than either of their constituents
separately, and accordingly, in those geological formations in which
they occur, the soils are generally of excellent quality. The same
effect is produced where numerous thin beds of members of the different
classes are interstratified, the disintegrated portions being gradually
intermixed, and valuable soils formed.
The fertility of the soils formed from the stratified rocks is also
increased by the presence of organic remains which afford a supply of
phosphoric acid, and which are sometimes so abundant as to form a by no
means unimportant part of their mass. They do not occur in the oldest
sedimentary rocks, but as we ascend to the more recent geological
epochs, they increase in abundance, until, in the greensands and other
recent formations, whole beds of coprolites and other organic remains
are met with. Great differences are observed in the quality of the soils
yielded by different rocks. In general, those formed by the
disintegration of clay slates are cold, heavy, and very difficult and
expensive to work; those of sandstone light and poor, and of limestone
often poor and thin. These statements must, however, be considered as
very general; for individual cases occur in which some of these
substances may produce good soils, remarkable exceptions being offered
by the lower chalk and some of the shales of the coal formation. Little
is at present known regarding the peculiar nature of many of these
rocks, or their composition; and the cause of the differences in the
fertility of the soil produced from them is a subject worthy of minute
investigation.
_Chemical Composition of the Soil._--Reference has been already made to
the division of the constituents of the soil into the two great classes
of organic and inorganic. And when treating of the sources of the
organic constituents of plants, we entered with some degree of
minuteness into the composition and relations of the different members
of the former class, and expressed the opinion that they did not admit
of being directly absorbed by the plant. But though the parts then
stated lead to the inference that, as a direct source of these
substances, humus is unimportant, it has other functions to perform
which render it an essential constituent of all fertile soils. These
functions are dependent partly on the power which it has of absorbing
and entering into chemical composition with ammonia, and with certain of
the soluble inorganic substances, and partly on the effect which the
carbonic acid produced by its decomposition exerts on the mineral
matters of the soil. In the former way, its effects are strikingly seen
in the manner in which ammonia is absorbed by peat; for it suffices
merely to pour upon some dried peat a small quantity of a dilute
solution of ammonia to find its smell immediately disappear. This
peculiar absorptive power extends also to the fixed alkalies, potash and
soda, as well as to lime and magnesia, and has an important effect in
preventing these substances being washed out of the soil--a property
which, as we shall afterwards see, is possessed also by the clay
contained in greater or less quantity in most soils. On the other hand,
the air and moisture which penetrate the soil cause its decomposition,
and the carbonic acid so produced attacks the undecomposed minerals
existing in it, and liberate the valuable substances they contain.
In considering the composition of a soil, it is important to bear in
mind that it is a substance of great complexity, not merely because it
contains a large number of chemical elements, but also because it is
made up of a mixture of several minerals in a more or less decomposed
state. The most cursory examination shows that it almost invariably
contains sand and scales of mica, and other substances can often be
detected in it. Now it has been already observed that the minerals of
which soils are composed, differ to a remarkable extent in the facility
with which they undergo decomposition, and the bearing of this fact on
its fertility is a matter of the highest importance, for it has been
found that the mere presence of an abundant supply of all the essential
constituents of plants is not always sufficient to constitute a fertile
soil. Two soils, for instance, may be found on analysis to have exactly
the same composition, although in practice one proves barren and the
other fertile. The cause of this difference lies in the particular
state of combination in which the elements are contained in them, and
unless this be such that the plant is capable of absorbing them, it is
immaterial in what quantity they are present, for they are thus locked
up from use, and condemn the soil to hopeless infertility.
It is admitted that unless the substances be present in a state in which
they can be dissolved, the plant is incapable of absorbing them; but it
is a matter of doubt whether it is necessary that they be actually
dissolved in the water which permeates the soil, or whether the plant is
capable of exercising a directly solvent action. The latter view is the
most probable, but at the same time it cannot be doubted, that if they
are presented to the plant in solution, they will be absorbed in that
state in preference to any other. Hence it has been considered important
in the analysis of a soil, not to rest content with the determination of
the quantity of each element it contains, but to obtain some indication
of the state of combination in which it exists, so as to have some idea
of the ease or difficulty with which they may be absorbed. For this
purpose it is necessary to determine, _1st_, The substances soluble in
water; _2d_, Those insoluble in water, but soluble in acids; _3d_, Those
insoluble both in water and acids; and if to these the organic
constituents be added, there are four separate heads under which the
components of a soil ought to be classified. This classification is
accordingly adopted in the most careful and minute analyses; but the
difficulty and labour attending them has hitherto precluded the
possibility of making them except in a few instances; and, generally
speaking, chemists have been contented with treating the soil with an
acid, and determining in the solution all that is dissolved. Such
analyses are often useful for practical purposes, as for example, when
they show the absence of lime, or any other individual substance, by the
addition of which we may rectify the deficiency of the soil; but they
are of comparatively little scientific value, and throw but little light
on the true constitution of the soil, and the sources of its fertility.
Nor is it likely that much satisfactory information will be obtained
until the number of minute analyses is so far extended as to establish
the fundamental principles on which the various properties of the soil
depends.
The separation of the constituents of a soil into the four great groups
already mentioned, is effected in the following manner:--A given
quantity of the soil is boiled with three or four successive quantities
of water, which dissolves out all the soluble matters. These generally
amount to about one-half per cent of the whole soil, and consist of
nearly equal proportions of organic and inorganic substances. In very
light and sandy soils, it occasionally happens that not more than one or
two-tenths per cent dissolve in water, and in peaty soils, on the other
hand, the proportion is sometimes considerably increased, principally
owing to the abundance of soluble organic matters.
When the residue of this operation is treated with dilute hydrochloric
acid, the matters soluble in acids are obtained in the fluid. The
proportion of these substances is liable to very great variations, and
in some soils of excellent quality, and well adapted to the growth of
wheat, it does not exceed 3 per cent; while in calcareous soils, such as
those of the chalk formation, it may reach as much as 50 or 60 per cent.
In general, however, it amounts to about 10 per cent. The organic
constituents are also very variable in amount; ordinary soils of good
quality containing from 2 to 10 per cent, while in peat soils they not
unfrequently reach 30 or even 50 per cent. But these cannot be
considered _fertile_ soils. The insoluble constituents are likewise
subject to great variations, but, in the ordinary clay and sandy soils
of this country, they generally form from 70 to 85 per cent of the
whole.
The distribution of the constituents under these different heads will be
best illustrated by a few analyses of soils of good quality, and for
this purpose we shall select two, noted for the excellent crops of wheat
they produce, and for their general fertility. The analyses were made
from the upper 10 inches, and a quantity of the 10 inches immediately
subjacent was analysed as subsoil. The first is the ordinary wheat soil
of the county of Mid-Lothian, the other the alluvial soil of the Carse
of Gowrie in Perthshire, so celebrated for the abundance and luxuriance
of the crops it produces.
|------------------------------------------|-------------------
| | Mid-Lothian. | Perthshire.
|----------------------|-------------------|-------------------
| | Soil. | Subsoil. | Soil. | Subsoil.
|----------------------|--------|----------|---------|---------
|SUBSTANCES SOLUBLE | | | |
| IN WATER. | | | |
|Silica | 0.0149 | 0.0104 | 0.0072 | 0.0461
|Lime | 0.0300 | 0.0072 | 0.0184 | 0.0306
|Magnesia | 0.0097 | 0.0016 | 0.0040 | 0.0034
|Chlor. of magnesium | -- | -- | -- | 0.0033
|Potash | 0.0034 | 0.0037 | -- | --
|Soda | 0.0065 | 0.0049 | -- | --
|Chloride of potassium | -- | -- | 0.0088 | 0.0080
|Chloride of sodium | -- | -- | 0.0110 | 0.0166
|Sulphuric acid | 0.0193 | 0.0124 | 0.0089 | 0.0239
|Chlorine | trace | trace | -- | --
|Organic matters | 0.1481 | 0.2228 | 0.0608 | 0.1342
| | -------|----------|-------------------
| | 0.2319 | 0.2630 | 0.1191 | 0.2661
|----------------------|--------|----------|---------|---------
|SOLUBLE IN ACIDS. | | | |
|Silica | 0.1490| 0.0680 | 0.0482 | 0.1697
|Peroxide of iron | 5.1730| 3.4820 | 4.8700 | 4.6633
|Alumina | 2.1540| 1.8130 | 2.6900 | 3.9070
|Lime | 0.4470| 0.3810 | 0.3616 | 0.5050
|Magnesia | 0.4120| 0.2850 | 0.3960 | 0.9420
|Potash | 0.0650| 0.1650 | 0.3445 | 0.1670
|Soda | 0.0050| 0.0560 | 0.1242 | 0.1920
|Sulphuric acid | 0.0250| 0.0850 | 0.0911 | 0.0160
|Phosphoric acid | 0.4300| 0.1970 | 0.2400 | 0.2680
|Carbonic acid | -- | -- | 0.0500 | --
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
| | 8.8600| 6.5320 | 9.2156 |10.8300
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
|INSOLUBLE IN ACIDS. | | | |
|Silica | 71.3890| 82.5090 | 63.1400 |61.4200
|Alumina | 4.7810| 3.5120 | 11.3500 |10.3400
|Peroxide of iron | trace | trace | -- | 1.5670
|Lime | 0.7520| 0.5500 | 0.4500 | 0.7400
|Magnesia | 0.6610| 0.5500 | 0.6200 | 0.4450
|Potash | 0.2860| -- | 2.4500 | 2.0030
|Soda | 0.4220| -- | 1.3100 | 0.8440
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
| | 78.2910| 87.1210 | 79.3200 |77.3590
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
|ORGANIC MATTERS. | | | |
| | | | |
|Insoluble organic } | | | |
| matter } | 8.8777| 4.2370 | 7.7400 | 6.2910
|Humine | 0.8850| 0.3450 | 0.0700 | 0.0840
|Humic acid | 0.1340| 0.0310 | 0.6800 | 0.3600
|Apocrenic acid | 0.1533| -- | -- | 0.0929
|Water | 2.6840| 1.7670 | 2.7000 | 4.5750
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
| | 12.7340| 6.3800 | 11.1900 |11.4020
| |========|==========|=========|=======
|Sum of all the | | | |
| constituents |100.1169| 100.2960 | 99.8447 |99.8571
|
| AMOUNT OF CARBON, HYDROGEN, NITROGEN, AND OXYGEN
| CONTAINED IN 100 PARTS OF EACH SOIL.
|
|Carbon | 4.510 | 1.3060 | 2.55 | 2.03
|Hydrogen | 0.550 | 0.3324 | 0.71 | 0.53
|Nitrogen | 0.220 | 0.0973 | 0.21 | 0.17
|Oxygen | 4.918 | 3.1001 | 5.08 | 4.09
| |--------|----------|---------|-------
| | 10.198 | 4.8358 | 8.55 | 6.82
---------------------------------------------------------------
In examining these analyses, it is particularly worthy of notice that by
far the larger proportion of the substances soluble in water consists of
organic matter, lime, and sulphuric acid, the two last being in
combination as sulphate of lime, while some of those substances which
are usually considered to be the most important mineral constituents of
plants are present in very small quantity--potash, for instance, forming
not more than 1-25,000th of the whole soil, and phosphoric acid being
entirely absent. On the other hand, this portion contains the whole of
the chlorine which exists in the soil, and this might be anticipated
from the ready solubility in water of the compounds of that substance.
The portion soluble in acids consists of alumina and oxide of iron, both
of which are comparatively unimportant to the plant, but very important,
as we shall afterwards see, in relation to the physical properties of
the soil. The remainder of the substances soluble in acids, amounting to
from 1 and 2 per cent, is composed of some of the most essential
constituents of plants. Lime, magnesia, potash, and soda, appear again
in larger quantity than in the soluble part, and along with them we have
the phosphoric acid to the amount of from 0.2 to 0.4 per cent of the
whole soil, and sulphuric acid in much smaller quantity.
The insoluble matters differ remarkably in the two soils, that from the
Carse of Gowrie being characterised by a large quantity of potash and
soda, indicating an important difference in the materials from which
they have been formed. In the Perthshire soil it is obvious that the
felspathic element has been abundant, and that its decomposition has
been arrested at a time, when it still contained a large quantity of
alkalies. And this difference is of great practical importance, because
those soils, which contain a large quantity of potash in their insoluble
portion, have within them a source of permanent fertility, the alkali
being gradually liberated by the decomposition which is constantly in
progress, owing to the air and moisture permeating the soil. As regards
the special distribution of the inorganic matters, it is to be observed
that some of them occur in each of the three heads under which they are
arranged, while others are confined to one or two. Silica and the
alkalies occur generally, though not invariably, in all three. Chlorine
is met with only in the part soluble in water, phosphoric acid only in
that soluble in acids, while sulphuric acid occurs in both the
last-named divisions.
The greater part of the organic matters are insoluble both in water and
acids. At least it is generally believed that any portion dissolved by
strong acids, in the course of analysis, has been entirely decomposed,
and is in a completely different state from that in which it existed
actually in the soil.
As an example of a calcareous soil, forming a striking contrast to those
given above, we select one from the island of Antigua, from which very
large crops of sugar-cane are obtained. The soil is of great depth, and
analyses of the subsoil at the depth of 18 inches and 5 feet are given.
These last analyses are not so minute as that of the soil itself, the
soluble matters not having been separately determined, but included in
that soluble in acids.
+-----------------------------+---------+-----------+--------+
| | Surface | 18 inches | 5 feet |
| | Soil. | deep. | deep. |
+-----------------------------+---------+-----------+--------+
| SOLUBLE IN WATER. | | | |
| | | | |
| Lime | 0.07 | ... | ... |
| Magnesia | trace | ... | ... |
| Potash | 0.06 | ... | ... |
| Soda | 0.04 | ... | ... |
| Chlorine | 0.05 | ... | ... |
| Organic matter | 0.15 | ... | ... |
| | ---- | | |
| | 0.37 | | |
| SOLUBLE IN ACIDS. | | | |
| | | | |
| Silica | 0.74 | ... | ... |
| Peroxide of iron | 2.22 | 1.67 | 1.87 |
| Protoxide of iron | 0.77 | 9.05 | 3.10 |
| Alumina | 1.90 | 2.52 | 4.21 |
| Lime | 10.43 | 3.04 | 25.75 |
| Magnesia | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.51 |
| Potash | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Soda | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.16 |
| Sulphuric acid | trace | 0.02 | 0.13 |
| Phosphoric acid | 0.14 | trace | 0.04 |
| Carbonic acid | 7.38 | 0.82 | 20.23 |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| | 23.83 | 18.06 | 56.28 |
| | | | |
| INSOLUBLE IN ACIDS. | | | |
| | | | |
| Silica | 41.44 | 51.24 | 27.67 |
| Protoxide of iron | 3.24 | 0.26 | 1.40 |
| Alumina | 9.00 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| Lime | 0.08 | 0.88 | trace |
| Magnesia | 0.80 | 0.54 | trace |
| Potash | ... | 0.74 | ... |
| Soda | ... | 0.25 | ... |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| | 54.56 | 55.41 | 30.07 |
| ORGANIC MATTERS. | | | |
| | | | |
| Humine | 1.58 }| | |
| Humic acid | 1.15 }| 12.05 | 7.49 |
| Insoluble organic matters | 7.66 }| | |
| Water | 11.13 | 14.69 | 6.06 |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| | 21.52 | 26.74 | 13.55 |
| +---------+-----------+--------+
| Sum of all the constituents | 100.28 | 100.21 | 99.90 |
| |=========|===========|========|
+-----------------------------+---------+-----------+--------+
In this soil there is a general resemblance in the composition of the
portion soluble in water to those of the wheat soils. But the part
soluble in acids is distinguished by the great abundance of carbonate of
lime.
The subsoil contains also a large quantity of protoxide of iron, a
substance frequently found in subsoils containing much organic matter,
and to which the air has imperfect access. Under these circumstances
peroxide of iron is reduced to protoxide; and when present abundantly in
the soil in that form, iron has been found to exercise a very injurious
influence on vegetation; and it has frequently happened that when
subsoils containing it have been brought up to the surface, they have in
the first instance caused a manifest deterioration of the soil, although
after some time, when it had become peroxidised by the action of the
air, it ceased to be injurious.
The soil of Holland, from the neighbourhood of the Zuider Zee, which is
an alluvial deposit from the waters of the Rhine, and produces large
crops, gave the results which follow--
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
| | Surface. | 15 inches | 30 inches |
| | | deep. | deep. |
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
| Insoluble silica | 57.646 | 51.706 | 55.372 |
| Soluble silica | 2.340 | 2.496 | 2.286 |
| Alumina | 1.830 | 2.900 | 2.888 |
| Peroxide of iron | 9.039 | 10.305 | 11.864 |
| Protoxide of iron | 0.350 | 0.563 | 0.200 |
| Oxide of manganese | 0.288 | 0.354 | 0.284 |
| Lime | 4.092 | 5.096 | 2.480 |
| Magnesia | 0.130 | 0.140 | 0.128 |
| Potash | 1.026 | 1.430 | 1.521 |
| Soda | 1.972 | 2.069 | 1.937 |
| Ammonia | 0.060 | 0.078 | 0.075 |
| Phosphoric acid | 0.466 | 0.324 | 0.478 |
| Sulphuric acid | 0.896 | 1.104 | 0.576 |
| Carbonic acid | 6.085 | 6.940 | 4.775 |
| Chlorine | 1.240 | 1.302 | 1.418 |
| Humic acid | 2.798 | 3.991 | 3.428 |
| Crenic acid | 0.771 | 0.731 | 0.037 |
| Apocrenic acid | 0.107 | 0.160 | 0.152 |
| Other organic matters and } | | | |
| Combined water } | 8.324 | 7.700 | 9.348 |
| Loss | 0.540 | 0.611 | 0.753 |
| | ------- | ------- | ------- |
| | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 |
| |==========|===========|===========|
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
It is unnecessary to multiply analyses of fertile soils, those now given
being sufficient to show their general composition. They are all
characterised by the presence, in considerable quantity, of all the
essential constituents of plants, in a state in which they may be
readily absorbed. The absence of one or more of these substances
immediately diminishes or altogether destroys the fertility of the soil;
and the extent to which this occurs is illustrated by the following
analysis of a soil from Pumpherston, Mid-Lothian, forming a small patch
in the lower part of a field, and on which nothing would grow. Being
naturally wet, it had been drained and sowed with oats, which died out
about six weeks after sowing, and left a bare soil on which weeds did
not show the slightest disposition to grow.
SOLUBLE IN ACIDS.
Soluble silica 0.173
Peroxide of iron 6.775
Alumina 1.150
Oxide of manganese trace
Carbonate of lime 0.856
Magnesia 0.099
Potash 0.132
Soda 0.123
Phosphoric acid trace
Chlorine trace
---- 9.308
Silica 73.096
Peroxide of iron 1.371
Alumina 4.263
Lime 0.858
Magnesia 0.520
---- 80.108
Organic matter 8.012
Water 2.391
---- 10.403
------
99.819
In this instance the barrenness of the soil is distinctly traceable to
the deficiency of phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, and chlorine. There
is also a remarkably large quantity of oxide of iron, which, when acted
on by the humic acid, is well known to be highly prejudicial to
vegetation, and that this took place was shown by the fact that the
drains, a couple of months after being laid, were almost stopped up by
humate of iron. Still more striking are the following analyses:--
+----------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------+
| | Moorland soil | Sandy soil | Soil from |
| | near Aurich, | near | near |
| | East Friesland. | Wettingen. | Muhlhausen. |
+----------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------+
| Silica and sand | 70.576 | 96.000 | 77.490 |
| Alumina | 1.050 | 0.500 | 9.490 |
| Oxide of iron | 0.252 | 2.000 | 5.800 |
| Oxide of manganese } | trace | { trace | 0.105 |
| Lime } | | { 0.001 | 0.866 |
| Magnesia | 0.012 } | | 0.728 |
| Potash } | } | | { trace |
| Soda } | trace } | trace | { |
| Phosphoric acid } | } | | 0.003 |
| Sulphuric acid } | } | | trace |
| Carbonic acid | ... | ... | 0.200 |
| Chlorine | trace | trace | trace |
| Humic acid | 11.910 | 0.200 | 0.732 |
| Insoluble humus | 16.200 | 1.299 | 0.200 |
| Water | ... | ... | 4.096 |
| |-----------------+------------|-------------|
| | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 |
+----------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------+
The results contained in these analyses are peculiarly remarkable, for
they indicate the almost total absence of all those substances which the
plant requires. They must, however, be considered as in a great measure
exceptional cases, as it is but rarely that so large a number of
constituents is absent, and it is much more frequent to find the
deficiency restricted to one or two substances. They are illustrations
of barrenness dependent on different circumstances. The first shows the
unimportance of the organic matters of the soil, which are here
unusually abundant, without in any way counteracting the infertility
dependent on the absence of the other constituents. The second is that
of a nearly pure sand; and the third, though it contains a greater
number of the essential ingredients of the ash, is still rendered
unfruitful by the deficiency of alkalies, sulphuric acid, and chlorine.
An examination of the foregoing analyses indicates pretty clearly some
of the conditions of fertility of the soil, which must obviously
contain all the constituents of the plants destined to grow upon it. But
it by no means exhausts the subject, for numerous instances are known of
soils containing all the essential elements of plants in abundance, but
on which they nevertheless refuse to grow. In these instances the defect
is due either to the presence of some substance injurious to the plant,
or to the state of combination of those it requires being such as to
prevent their absorption. Reference has been already made to the bad
effects of protoxide of iron, and it would appear that organic matter is
sometimes injurious. Even water, by excluding air, and so preventing
those decompositions which play so important a part in liberating the
essential elements from their more permanent compounds, although it
cannot render a soil absolutely barren, not unfrequently materially
diminishes its fertility.
The state of combination of the soil constituents unquestionably
exercise a most important influence on its fertility. That this must be
the case is an inference which may be easily drawn from the statements
already made regarding the different minerals from which it is directly
or indirectly produced. If, for instance, a soil consist to a large
extent of mica, it would be found on analysis to contain abundance of
potash and some other matters, and yet our knowledge of the difficulty
with which that mineral is decomposed, would enable us to pronounce
unfavourably of the soil; and practical experience here fully confirms
the scientific inference.
The forms of combination most favourable to fertility is a subject on
which our information is at present comparatively limited. It was at one
time believed that solubility in water was an indispensable requisite,
but recent investigations appear to lead to a directly contrary
conclusion. The analyses of soils already given, show that the part
directly soluble in water embraces only a certain number of the
constituents of the plant, and of those dissolved the quantity is very
small. This becomes still more apparent if we estimate from the analyses
the actual quantities of those substances contained in an acre of soil.
It is generally assumed that the soil on an imperial acre of land 10
inches deep weighs in round numbers about 1000 tons; and calculating
from this, we find that the quantity of potash soluble in water in the
Mid-Lothian wheat soil, amounts to no more than 70 lb. per acre. But a
crop of hay carries off from the soil about 38 lb. of potash, and one of
turnips, including tops, not less than 200 lb., so that if only the
matters soluble in water could be taken up by the plant, such soils
could not possess the amount of fertility which they are actually found
to have.
It is to be remembered, also, that in these analyses the experiment is
made under the most favourable circumstances for ascertaining the whole
quantity of matters which are capable of dissolving in water; that
practically dissolved is very different. The recent analysis by Krocker
and Way of the drainage water of soils afford a means of estimating
this. Way found in one gallon of the drainage water from seven different
fields, collected in the end of December--
+-------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
+-------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Potash, |trace |trace | 0.02 | 0.05 |trace | 0.22 |trace |
| Soda, | 1.00 | 2.17 | 2.26 | 0.87 | 1.42 | 1.40 | 3.20 |
| Lime, | 4.85 | 7.19 | 6.05 | 2.26 | 2.52 | 5.82 |13.00 |
| Magnesia, | 0.68 | 2.32 | 2.48 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.93 | 2.50 |
| Iron and Alumina, | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.10 | none | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.50 |
| Silica, | 0.95 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 1.20 | 1.80 | 0.65 | 0.85 |
| Chlorine, | 0.70 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 0.81 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 2.62 |
| Sulphuric acid, | 1.65 | 5.15 | 4.40 | 1.71 | 1.29 | 3.12 | 9.51 |
| Phosphoric acid, |trace | 0.12 |trace |trace | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Ammonia, | 0.018| 0.018| 0.018| 0.012| 0.018| 0.006| 0.018|
| Nitric acid, | 7.17 |14.74 |12.72 | 1.95 | 3.45 | 8.05 |11.45 |
| Organic matter, | 7.00 | 7.40 |12.50 | 5.60 | 5.70 | 5.80 | 7.40 |
+-------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
Some of the soils from which these waters were obtained had been manured
with unusually large quantities of nitrogenous matters, which accounts
for the large amount of nitric acid, as well as the lime which that acid
has extracted. Dr. Krocker's analyses were made on soils less highly
manured, and the water was collected in summer.
+-----------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | IN 10,000 PARTS. |
| +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------|
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+
| Organic matter | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| Carbonate of lime | 0.84 | 0.84 | 1.27 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| Sulphate of lime | 2.08 | 2.10 | 1.14 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| Nitrate of lime | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Carbonate of magnesia | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.47 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.16 |
| Carbonate of iron | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Potash | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Soda | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Chloride of sodium | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Silica | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+
In order to obtain from these experiments an estimate of the quantity of
the substances actually dissolved, we shall select the results obtained
by Way. The average rainfall in Kent, where the waters he examined were
obtained, is 25 inches. Now, it appears that about two-fifths of all the
rain which falls escapes through the drains, and the rest is got rid of
by evaporation. An inch of rain falling on an imperial acre weighs
rather more than a hundred tons; hence, in the course of a year, there
must pass off by the drains about 1000 tons of drainage water, carrying
with it, out of the reach of the plants, such substances as it has
dissolved, and 1500 tons must remain to give to the plant all that it
holds in solution. These 1500 tons of water must, if they have the same
composition as that which escapes, contain only two and a half pounds of
potash, and less than a pound of ammonia. It may be alleged that the
water which remains, lying longer in contact with the soil, may contain
a larger quantity of matters in solution; but even admitting this to be
the case, it cannot for a moment be supposed that they can ever amount
to more than a very small fraction of what is required for a single
crop. It may therefore be stated with certainty that solubility in water
is not essential to the absorption of substances by the plant, which
must possess the power of itself directly attacking, acting chemically
on, and dissolving them. The mode in which it does this is entirely
unknown, but it in all probability depends on very feeble chemical
actions, and hence the importance of having the soil constituents, not
in solution, but in such a state that they may be readily made soluble
by the plants. Many of the minerals from which fertile soils are formed
are probably not attackable by plants when in their natural condition,
and even after disintegration the quantity of the essential elements of
their food, which are present in an easily assimilable state, is at no
one time very large. But this is of comparatively little importance, for
the soil is not an inert unchangeable substance; it is the theatre of an
important series of chemical changes effected by the action of air and
moisture, and producing a continued liberation of its constituents. This
decomposition is effected partly by the carbonic acid of the atmosphere,
but to a much larger extent by its oxygen acting upon the organic
matters of the soil, and causing a constant though slow evolution of
that acid, which in its turn attacks the mineral matters. Boussingault
and Levy have illustrated the extent of this action by examining the
composition of the air contained in the pores of different soils, and
have obtained the following results:--
+--------------------+------------+---------------+---------------------------+
| Nature of | Crop. | No. of cubic |100 VOLUMES OF AIR CONTAIN |
| Soil. | | inches of air +--------+--------+---------+
| | | in 34 cubic |Carbonic| Oxygen.|Nitrogen.|
| | | inches of soil| acid. | | |
+--------------------+------------+---------------+--------+--------+---------+
|Light sandy soil, | | | | | |
| newly manured | ... | 8.0 | 2.17 | ... | ... |
| Do. manured | | | | | |
| 8 days before | ... | ... | 1.54 | 18.80| 79.66 |
| Do. long |Yellow | | | | |
| after manuring | turnip | 7.9 | 0.93 | 19.50| 79.57 |
|Very sandy |Vineyard | 9.6 | 1.06 | 19.72| 79.22 |
|Sandy, with many | | | | | |
| stones |Forest | 4.0 | 0.87 | 19.61| 79.52 |
|Loamy | ... | 2.4 | 0.46 | ... | ... |
|Sandy, subsoil | | | | | |
| of the last | ... | 3.0 | 0.24 | ... | ... |
|Sandy soil, long | | | | | |
| after manuring |Trefoil | 7.6 | 0.74 | 19.02| 80.24 |
| Do. Recently | | | | | |
| manured | ... | ... | 0.85 | 19.41| 79.74 |
| Do. manured 8 | | | | | |
| days before | ... | ... | 1.54 | 18.80| 79.66 |
|Heavy clay |Jerusalem | 7.0 | 0.66 | 19.99| 79.35 |
| | artichoke | | | | |
|Fertile soil (moist)|Meadow | 5.5 | 1.79 | 19.41| 78.80 |
+--------------------+------------+---------------+--------+--------+---------+
From these analyses it appears that the air contained in the pores of
the soil is much richer in carbonic acid than the atmosphere, the
poorest soil containing about 25 times, and a recently manured soil 250
times as much. This carbonic acid, which is obviously produced by the
decomposition of the vegetable matters and manure, acting partly as gas
and partly dissolved in the soil water, exerts a solvent action on its
constituents. And, though a very feeble acid, its continuous action
produces in the course of time a large effect; while, during the
interval, the constituents of the soil are safely stored up, and
liberated only as the plant requires them, by which bountiful provision
of nature they are exposed to fewer risks of loss than if they had been
all along in a state in which they could be absorbed. Carbonic acid not
only assists in effecting the decomposition of the minerals of the soil,
but its aqueous solution acts as a solvent of many substances, which
are quite insoluble in pure water. It is in this way that much of the
lime contained in natural waters is held in solution, and it has been
ascertained that magnesia, iron, and even phosphate of lime, may also be
dissolved by it. It is probable that when these substances are
dissolved, the plants will take them from solution in place of
themselves attacking the insoluble matters; but of the extent to which
this may occur nothing is yet known--the action of solvents on the soil
being a subject which is as yet scarcely examined.
Carbonic acid is, however, a most important agent in producing the
chemical changes in the soil, and the particular value of humus lies in
its affording a supply of that substance exactly when it is wanted; but
the carbonic acid of the atmosphere also takes part in these changes,
although with different degrees of rapidity according to the character
of the soil, acting rapidly in light, and slowly in stiff, clay soils.
The solvent action of the carbonic acid is, no doubt, principally
exerted on the substances soluble in acids, but not entirely, for it is
known that the insoluble part is gradually being disintegrated and made
soluble; and hence it is that the composition of that part of the soil
which resists the action of acids, and which at first sight might appear
of no moment, is really important. It is obvious that this circumstance
must at once confer on the soil of the Carse of Gowrie a great
superiority over those of Mid-Lothian and most other districts; for it
contains in its insoluble part a quantity of alkalies which must
necessarily form a source of continued fertility. Accordingly,
experience has all along shown the great superiority of that soil, and
of alluvial soils generally, which are all more or less similar to it.
The facility with which these matters are attackable by carbonic acid is
also an important element of the fertility of a soil, and it is to the
existence of compounds which are readily decomposed by it that we
attribute the high fertility of the trap soils.
By a further examination of the analyses of fertile soils, it is at once
apparent that the most essential constituents of plants are by no means
very abundant in them. In fact, phosphoric and sulphuric acids, lime,
magnesia, and the alkalies, which in most instances make up nine-tenths
of the ash of plants, form but a small portion of even the most fertile
soils; while silica, which, except in the grasses, occurs in small
quantity, oxide of iron which is a limited, and alumina a rare,
constituent of the ash, constitute by far their larger part. Thus the
total amount of potash, soda, lime, magnesia, phosphoric and sulphuric
acids and chlorine, contained in the Mid-Lothian wheat soil amounts only
to 3.5888 per cent, and in the Perthshire to 6.4385, the entire
remainder being substances which enter into the plant for the most part
in much smaller quantity. And, as these small quantities of the more
important substances are capable of supplying the wants of the plant, it
must be obvious that a very small fraction of the silica, oxide of iron,
and alumina, which the soils contain, would afford to it the whole
quantity of these substances it requires, and that the remainder must
have some other functions to perform.
The soil must be considered not merely as the source of the inorganic
food of plants, for it has to act also as a support for them while
growing, and to retain a sufficient quantity of moisture to support
their life; and unless it possess the properties which fit it for this
purpose, it may contain all the elements of the food of plants, and yet
be nearly or altogether barren.
The adaptation of the soil to this function is dependent to a great
extent on its mechanical texture, and on this considerable light is
frequently thrown by a kind of mechanical analysis.
If a soil be shaken up with water and allowed to stand for a few
minutes, it rapidly deposits a quantity of grains which are at once
recognised as common sand; and if the water be then poured off into
another vessel and allowed to stand for a longer time, a fine soft
powder, having the properties and composition of common clay, is
deposited, while the clear fluid retains the soluble matters. By a more
careful treatment it is possible to distinguish and separate humus, and
in soils lying on chalk or limestone, calcareous matter or carbonate of
lime.
In this way the components can be classified into four groups, a mixture
of two or more of which in variable proportions is found in all soils.
The relative proportions in which these substances exist in soils are,
as we shall afterwards see, the foundation of their classification into
the light, heavy, calcareous, and other sub-divisions. But they are also
intimately connected with certain chemical and mechanical peculiarities
which have an important bearing on its fertility. It is a familiar fact,
that particular soils are specially adapted to the growth of certain
crops; and we talk of a wheat or a turnip soil as readily
distinguishable. It is to be observed, however, that in many such
instances the mere analysis may show no difference, or, at least, none
sufficient to account for the peculiarity. A remarkable illustration is
offered by the following analyses of two soils, on one of which red
clover grows luxuriantly, while on the other it invariably fails.
Clover fails. Clover succeeds.
Insoluble silicates 83.90 81.34
Soluble silica 0.08 0.02
Peroxide of iron 4.45 6.68
Alumina 2.40 3.00
Lime 1.23 1.33
Magnesia 0.45 0.25
Potash 0.20 0.22
Soda 0.07 0.09
Sulphuric acid 0.05 0.08
Phosphoric acid 0.38 0.07
Carbonic acid 0.09 0.34
Chlorine trace trace
Humic acid 0.42 0.43
Humine ... 0.10
Insoluble organic matters 3.70 3.61
Water 2.54 2.52
---- ----
99.96 100.08
Nitrogen 0.15 1.15
In this instance such difference as exists is rather in favour of the
soil on which clover fails, but it is exceedingly trifling; and it is
necessary to seek an explanation in the special properties of its
mechanical constituents.
These properties are partly mechanical and partly chemical, and in both
ways exercise an important influence on the fertility of the soil.
Sand and clay, the most important of the mechanical constituents, confer
on the soil diametrically opposite properties; the former, when present
in large quantity, producing what are designated as light, the latter
stiff or heavy soils. The hard indestructible siliceous grains, of which
sand is composed, form a soil of an open texture, through which water
readily permeates; while clay, from its fine state of division, and
peculiar adhesiveness or plasticity, gives it a close-textured and
retentive character, and their proper intermixture produces a light
fertile loam, each tempering the peculiar properties of the other.
Indeed, their mixture is manifestly essential, for sand alone contains
little or none of the essential ingredients of plants; and if present in
large quantity, the openness of the soil is excessive, water flows
through it with rapidity, manures are rapidly wasted, and on the
accession of drought, the plants growing upon it soon languish and die.
Clay, on the other hand, is by itself equally objectionable; the
closeness of its texture prevents the spreading of the roots of plants,
and the access of carbonic acid, which, as we have already seen, is so
important an agent in the changes occurring in the soil. In fact, a pure
clay, that is to say, a clay unmixed with sand, even though it may
contain all the essential constituents of the plant, is for this reason
unfertile. Practically, of course, these extreme cases rarely occur; the
heaviest clay soils being mixtures of true clay with sand, and the most
sandy containing their proportion of clay; but frequently the
preponderance of the one over the other is so great, as to produce soils
greatly inferior to those in which the mixture is more uniform.
It is easy to understand how the proportions in which sand and clay are
mixed must affect the suitability of soils to particular crops, and that
an open soil must be favourable to the turnip, and a heavy clay, owing
to the resistance it offers to the expansion of the bulbs, unfavourable.
But these substances also exercise an important chemical action on the
soluble constituents of the food of plants, combining with them, and
converting them into an insoluble, or nearly insoluble state, so as to
prevent their being washed away by the rain or other water which
percolates through the soil. It has long been known to chemists that
clay has a tendency to absorb a small proportion of ammonia, and even
when brought up from a great depth frequently contains that substance.
It is to Mr. Thompson of Moat Hall, however, that we owe the important
observation, that arable soils rapidly remove ammonia from solution, and
Way, who pursued this investigation, showed that not only ammonia, but
potash, and several of the other important elements of the food of
plants, are thus absorbed. The removal of these substances from solution
is easily illustrated by a simple experiment. It suffices to take a tall
cylindrical vessel open at both ends, and filled with the soil to be
operated upon, which is retained by a piece of rag tied over its lower
end. A quantity of a dilute solution of ammonia being then poured upon
the surface of the soil, and allowed to percolate, the first quantity
which flows away is found to have entirely lost its peculiar smell and
taste; and in a similar manner the removal of potash may be illustrated.
This action is by no means confined to those substances when in the free
state, but is equally marked when they are combined with acids in the
form of salts, and in the latter case the absorption is attended with a
true chemical decomposition, the base only being retained, and the acid
escaping most commonly in combination with lime. Thus, if sulphate of
ammonia be employed, the water which flows from the soil contains
sulphate of lime, and if muriate of ammonia be used, it is muriate of
lime which escapes.
This absorbent action is most remarkably manifested in the case of
ammonia and potash, but it takes place also with magnesia and soda. With
the latter, however, it is incomplete, only a half or a fourth of the
soda being removed from solution, the difference depending to some
extent on the acid with which it is in combination. The extent to which
absorption takes place varies also with the nature of the soil, and the
state of combination of the substance used. Exact experiments have
hitherto been chiefly confined to ammonia, potash, and lime in the free
state, and as bicarbonate; and the following table gives the results
obtained by Way, with solutions containing about 1 per cent of these
substances in solution:--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Loamy | Red soil,| Pure | Subsoil |
| | soil, | Berkshire.| clay. | clay, |
| |Dorsetshire.| | | Somersetshire.|
------------------------|------------------------|----------|---------------|
|Ammonia, caustic | 0.3438 | 0.1570 | ... | ... |
| " from muriate | 0.3478 | 0.1966 | 0.2847| 0.0818 |
|Potash, caustic | ... | ... | 1.050 | 2.087 |
| " from nitrate | ... | ... | 0.4980| ... |
|Lime, caustic | ... | ... | 1.468 | ... |
| " from bicarbonate | ... | ... | 0.731 | ... |
------------------------|------------|-----------|----------|---------------
From these numbers it appears that very great differences exist in the
absorbent power of different soils, the first of those experimented on
being capable of taking more than twice as much ammonia as the second,
and nearly four times as much as the subsoil clay. It appears also, as
far as absorption goes, to be immaterial whether the ammonia is free or
combined. But it is different with potash, which is absorbed from the
nitrate to the extent of about O.6 per cent, and from a caustic solution
of potash to double that amount.
The circumstances under which absorption takes place modify, in a manner
which cannot well be explained, the amount absorbed by the same soil. It
is found generally to be most complete with very dilute solutions, and
if a soil be agitated with a quantity of ammonia larger than it can
take up, it will absorb only a certain amount of that substance, but by
a further increase of the amount of ammonia a still larger quantity will
be absorbed.
It is important to observe that when a salt is used, the base only is
absorbed, and the acid escapes in combination with lime; even nitric
acid, notwithstanding its importance as a food of plants, being in this
predicament. From this it may be gathered that lime is not readily
absorbed from solutions of its salts; indeed, it would appear that the
only salt of that substance liable to absorption is the bicarbonate,
from which it is taken to the extent of 1.4 per cent by the soil. The
absorption of lime from this salt, and that of phosphoric acid, which
takes place to a considerable extent, probably occurs, however, quite
independently of the clay present in the soil, and is occasioned by its
_lime_, which forms an insoluble compound with phosphoric acid, and by
removing half the carbonic acid of the bicarbonate of lime converts it
also into an insoluble state.
In addition to these mineral substances, organic matters are also
removed from solution. This is conspicuously seen in the case of putrid
urine, which not only loses its ammonia, but also its smell and colour,
when allowed to percolate through soil; and an equally marked result was
obtained with flax water, from which the organic matter was entirely
abstracted.
The cause of this absorptive power is still very imperfectly known. Mr.
Way having observed that sand has no such property, while clay, even
when obtained from a considerable depth, always possesses it, supposed
that the absorption was entirely due to that substance. A difficulty,
however, presents itself in explaining how it should happen that while a
pure clay absorbs only 0.2847 of ammonia, a loamy soil, of which
one-half probably is sand, should absorb a larger quantity. The
inference is, that the effect cannot be due to the clay as a whole, and
Mr. Way has sought to explain it by supposing that there exist in the
soil particular double silicates of alumina and lime. He has shown that
felspar and the other minerals from which the soil is produced have no
absorbent power, but that artificial compounds can be formed which act
upon solutions of ammonia and potash in a manner very similar to the
soil; but there is not the slightest evidence that these compounds exist
in the soil, and in the year 1853[I] I pointed out the probability that
clay is not the only agent at work, but that the organic matters take
part in the process. So powerful indeed is the affinity of these
substances for ammonia, that chemists are at one as to the difficulty of
obtaining humic and other similar acids pure, owing to the obstinacy
with which they retain it; and there cannot be a doubt that in many
soils these substances are in this point of view of much importance.
This is particularly the case in peat soils, which, though naturally
barren, may be made to produce good crops by the application of sand or
gravel; and as neither of these can cause any absorption of the valuable
matters, we must attribute this effect to the organic matter. Referring
to an earlier series of experiments made in 1850, I showed that, if a
quantity of dry peat be taken and ammonia poured on it, its smell
disappears; and this may be continued until upwards of 1.5 per cent of
dry ammonia has been absorbed, and this quantity is _retained_ by the
peat.
In this case pure ammonia was used, but Way's experiments having shown
that this alkali is not absorbed from its salts by organic matters, I
expressed the opinion that humate of lime (which certainly exists in
most soils) ought on chemical grounds to decompose the salts of ammonia
and cause the retention of their base. The recent researches of
Brustlein have shown that lime does cause the organic matters to absorb
ammonia from its salts. He confirms the fact that pure ammonia is
absorbed by peat, and shows that decayed wood has the same effect,
although both are without action on solutions of its salts. A stiff
clay, on the other hand, containing organic matters and much carbonate
of lime, readily absorbed ammonia, both when pure and combined; but
after extracting the lime by means of a dilute acid, it lost the power
of taking it from its salts, although it retained the free alkali as
completely as before. On the addition of a small quantity of lime, it
again acquired the power of withdrawing ammonia from its compounds.
These experiments may be explained, either on the supposition of the
presence of humate of lime, or by supposing that the carbonate of lime
first decomposed the salts of ammonia, and that the liberated alkali
combined with the organic matter. It must be admitted, however, that it
is very doubtful whether the ammonia and other substances are fixed in
the soil by a true chemical combination. They are certainly retained by
a very feeble attraction, for it appears from Brustlein's experiments
that ammonia may be, to a considerable extent, removed by washing with
abundance of water, and that if the soil which has absorbed ammonia be
allowed to become dry in the air, it loses half its ammonia, and after
four times moistening and drying, three-fourths have disappeared. These
facts are certainly not incompatible with the presence of a true
chemical compound, for the humate of ammonia is not absolutely
insoluble, and many cases occur of actions taking place in the presence
of water, which are entirely reversed when that fluid is removed; and it
is quite possible that when humate of ammonia is dried in contact with
carbonate of lime, it may be decomposed, and carbonate of ammonia
escape. There are other circumstances, however, which render it, on the
whole, most probable that the combination is not wholly chemical, but
rather of a physical character, among which may be more especially
mentioned the fact, that the quantity of the substances retained by the
soil is dependent on the degree of dilution of the fluid from which they
are taken; and that the quantity absorbed never exceeds a very small
fraction of the weight of the soil.
The practical inferences to be drawn from these facts regarding the
value of soils are of the highest importance. It is obvious that two
soils having exactly the same chemical composition may differ widely in
absorptive power, and that which possesses it most largely must have the
highest agricultural value. The examination of different soils, in this
point of view, is a subject of much importance, and deserves the best
attention of both farmers and chemists, although little has as yet been
done in regard to it, and the results which have been obtained are not
of a very satisfactory character. Liebig states, that in his
experiments, all the arable soils examined possessed the same absorptive
power, whether they contained a large or a small proportion of lime or
alumina. It can scarcely be expected, however, that this should be true
in all cases, and there are many facts which seem to indicate that
differences must exist. It is well known that there are some soils in
which the manure is very rapidly exhausted, and it is more than probable
that this effect is due to deficient absorptive power, which leaves the
soluble matters at the mercy of the weather, and liable at any moment
to be washed out by a heavy fall of rain.
The more strictly mechanical properties of the soil, such as its
relations to heat and moisture, are not less important than its chemical
composition. It is known that soils differ so greatly in these respects
as sometimes materially to affect their productive capacity. Thus, for
instance, two soils may be identical in composition, but one may be
highly hygrometric, that is, may absorb moisture readily from the air,
while the other may be very deficient in that property. Under ordinary
circumstances no difference will be apparent in their produce, but in a
dry season the crop upon the former may be in a flourishing condition,
while that on the latter is languishing and enfeebled, merely from its
inability to absorb from the air, and supply to the plant the quantity
of water required for its growth. In the same way, a soil which absorbs
much heat from the sun's rays surpasses another which has not that
property; and though in many cases this effect is comparatively
unimportant, in others it may make the difference between successful and
unsuccessful cultivation in soils which lie in an unfavourable climate
or exposure.
The investigation of the physical characters of soils has attracted
little attention, and we owe all our present knowledge of the subject to
a very elaborate series of researches on this subject, published by
Schuebler, nearly thirty years ago. He determined _1st_, The specific
gravity of the soils; _2d_, The quantity of water which they are capable
of imbibing; _3d_, The rapidity with which they give off by evaporation
the water they have imbibed; that is, their tendency to become dry;
_4th_, The extent to which they shrink in drying; _5th_, Their
hygrometric power; _6th_, The extent to which they are heated by the
sun's rays; _7th_, The rapidity with which a heated soil cools down,
which indicates its power of _retaining_ heat; _8th_, Their tenacity, or
the resistance they offer to the passage of agricultural implements;
_9th_, Their power of absorbing oxygen from the air. Each of these
experiments was performed on several different soils, and on their
mechanical constituents. Schuebler's experiments are undoubtedly
important, and though the methods employed are some of them not
altogether beyond cavil, they have apparently been performed with great
care. It is nevertheless desirable that they should be repeated, for
such facts ought not to rest on the authority of one experimenter,
however skilful and conscientious, nor on a single series of soils,
which may not give a fair representation of their general physical
properties. In fact, Schuebler appears to imagine that having once
determined the extent to which the sand, clay, and other mechanical
constituents of the soil possess these properties, we are in a condition
to predicate the effect of their mixture in variable proportions,
although this is by no means probable.
In examining these properties, Schuebler selected for experiment, pure
siliceous sand, calcareous sand (carbonate of lime in coarse grains),
finely powdered carbonate of lime, pure clay, humus, and powdered
gypsum. He used also a heavy clay consisting of 11 per cent of sand and
89 of pure clay, a somewhat stiff clay containing 24 per cent of sand
and 76 of clay, a light clay with 40 per cent of sand and 60 of pure
clay, a garden soil consisting of 52.4 per cent of clay, 36.5 of
siliceous sand, 1.8 of calcareous sand, 2 per cent of finely divided
carbonate of lime, and 7.2 of humus, and two arable soils, one from
Hoffwyl, and one from a valley in the Jura, the former a somewhat stiff,
the latter a light soil.
+-------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+------------+
| | | | Of 100 | |
| | | | parts of | Diminution |
| | | Water | water | in bulk |
| | | absorbed | absorbed | during |
| | | by 100 | there | drying of |
| | Specific | parts | evaporate | 100 parts |
| | gravity. | per cent. | in four | moist |
| | | | hours | soil |
| | | | at 66 deg. | |
+-------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+------------+
| Siliceous sand | 2.753 | 25 | 88.4 | 0.0 |
| Calcareous sand | 2.822 | 29 | 75.9 | 0.0 |
| Light clay | 2.701 | 40 | 52.0 | 6.0 |
| Stiff clay | 2.652 | 50 | 45.7 | 8.9 |
| Heavy clay | 2.603 | 61 | 34.9 | 11.4 |
| Pure clay | 2.591 | 70 | 31.3 | 18.3 |
| Carbonate of lime | 2.468 | 85 | 28.0 | 5.0 |
| Humus | 1.225 | 190 | 20.5 | 20.0 |
| Gypsum | 2.358 | 27 | 71.7 | 0.0 |
| Garden soil | 2.332 | 96 | 24.5 | 14.9 |
| Soil from Hoffwyl | 2.401 | 52 | 32.0 | 12.0 |
| Soil from Jura | 2.526 | 47 | 40.1 | 9.5 |
+-------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+------------+
+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+------------+
| | Quantity | Power of |
| | of | retaining |
| | hygrometric water absorbed | heat. |
| | by 77.165 grains of the soil spread on | Calcareous |
| | a surface of 141.48 square inches. | sand, |
--------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+ 100. |
| | 12 hours.| 24 hours.| 48 hours.| 72 hours.| |
--------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+-------------
| Siliceous sand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95.6 |
| Calcareous sand | 0.154 | 0.231 | 0.231 | 0.231 | 100.0 |
| Light clay | 1.617 | 2.002 | 2.156 | 2.156 | 76.9 |
| Stiff clay | 1.925 | 2.310 | 2.618 | 2.695 | 71.1 |
| Heavy clay | 2.310 | 2.772 | 3.080 | 3.157 | 68.4 |
| Pure clay | 2.849 | 3.234 | 3.696 | 3.773 | 66.7 |
| Carbonate of lime | 2.002 | 2.387 | 2.695 | 2.695 | 61.8 |
| Humus | 6.160 | 7.469 | 8.470 | 9.240 | 49.0 |
| Gypsum | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 73.2 |
| Garden soil | 2.695 | 3.465 | 3.850 | 4.004 | 64.8 |
| Soil from Hoffwyl | 1.232 | 1.771 | 1.771 | 1.771 | 70.1 |
| Soil from Jura | 1.078 | 1.463 | 1.540 | 1.540 | 74.3 |
--------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+------------+
|------------------+------------+-----------------|
| | | Quantity of |
| | | oxygen absorbed |
| | | by |
| | | 77.165 grains |
| | | of the moist |
| | | soil in 30 |
| | Tenacity | days, from 15 |
| | of the | cubic inches |
| | soils. | of atmospheric |
| | Pure clay, | air. |
| | 100. | Expressed in |
| | | cubic inches. |
+-----------------+|------------|-----------------|
|Siliceous sand | 0 | 0.24 |
|Calcareous sand | 0 | 0.84 |
|Light clay | 57.3 | 1.39 |
|Stiff clay | 68.8 | 1.65 |
|Heavy clay | 83.3 | 2.04 |
|Pure clay | 100.0 | 2.29 |
|Carbonate of lime | 5.0 | 1.62 |
|Humus | 8.7 | 3.04 |
|Gypsum | 7.3 | 0.40 |
|Garden soil | 7.6 | 2.60 |
|Soil from Hoffwyl | 33.0 | 2.43 |
|Soil from Jura | 22.0 | 2.25 |
---------------------------------------------------
The experiments detailed in the preceding table speak in a great measure
for themselves, and scarcely require detailed comment. It may be
remarked, however, that the columns illustrating the relations of the
soil to water are probably more important than the others. The
superiority of a retentive over an open soil is sufficiently familiar in
practice, and though this is no doubt partly due to the former absorbing
and retaining more completely the ammonia and other valuable
constituents of the manures applied to it, it is also dependent to an
equal if not greater extent upon the power it possesses of retaining
moisture. A reference to the table makes it apparent that this power is
presented under three different heads, which are certainly related to
one another, but are not identical. In the second column of the table is
given the quantity of water absorbed by the soil, determined by placing
a given weight of the perfectly dry soil in a funnel, the neck of which
is partially stopped with a small piece of sponge or wool, pouring water
upon it, and weighing it after the water has ceased to drop from it.
This may be considered as representing the quantity of water retained by
these different soils when thoroughly saturated by long continued rains.
The column immediately succeeding gives the quantity of that water which
escapes by evaporation from the same soil after exposure for four hours
to dry air at the temperature of 66 deg.. The fifth, sixth, seventh, and
eighth columns indicate the quantity of moisture absorbed, when the
soil, previously artificially dried, is exposed to moist air for
different periods. These characters are dependent principally, though
not entirely, on the porosity of the soil. The last may also be in some
measure due to the presence of particular salts, such as common salt,
which has a great affinity for moisture, but is chiefly occasioned by
their peculiar structure. It is to be remarked that clay and humus are
two of the most highly hygrometric substances known, and it is
peculiarly interesting to observe, that by a beneficent provision of
nature, they also form a principal part of all fertile soils. The
quantity of water imbibed by the soil is important to its fertility, in
so far as it prevents it becoming rapidly dry after having been
moistened by the rains. It is valuable also in another point of view,
because if the soil be incapable of absorbing much water, it becomes
saturated by a moderate fall of rain, and when a larger quantity falls,
the excess of necessity percolates through the soil, and carries off
with it a certain quantity of the soluble salts. Important as this
property is, however, it must not be possessed in too high a degree, but
must permit the _evaporation_ of the water retained with a certain
degree of rapidity. Soils which do not admit of this taking place are
the cause of much inconvenience and injury in practice. By becoming
thoroughly saturated with moisture during winter, they remain for a long
time in a wet and unworkable condition, in consequence of which they
cannot be prepared and sown until late in the season, and though
chemically unexceptionable, they are always disadvantageous, and in some
seasons greatly disappoint the hopes of the farmer.
The extent to which the imbibition and evaporation of water takes place
is very variable, but they are obviously related to one another, the
soils which absorb it least abundantly parting with it again with the
greatest, facility; for it appears that siliceous sand absorbs only
one-fourth of its weight of water, and again gives off in the course of
four hours four-fifths of that it had taken up, while humus, which
imbibes nearly twice its weight, retains nine-tenths of that quantity
after four hours' exposure. Long-continued and slow evaporation of the
water absorbed by a soil is injurious in another way, for it makes the
soil "cold"--a term of practical origin, but which very correctly
expresses the peculiarity in question. It is due to the fact, that when
water evaporates it absorbs a very large quantity of heat, which
prevents the soil acquiring a sufficiently high temperature from the
sun's rays. The soils which have absorbed a large quantity of moisture
shrink more or less in the process of drying, and form cracks, which
often break the delicate fibres of the roots of the plants, and cause
considerable injury: the extent of this shrinking is given in the fourth
column.
The relation of the soils to heat divides itself into two
considerations: the amount of heat absorbed by the soil, and the degree
in which it is retained. Of these the latter only is illustrated in the
table. The former is dependent on so many special considerations, that
the results cannot be tabulated in a satisfactory manner. It is
independent of the chemical nature of the soil, but varies to a great
extent according to its colour, the angle of incidence of the sun's
rays, and its state of moisture. It is, however, an important character,
and has been found by Girardin to exercise a considerable influence on
the rapidity with which the crop ripens. He found in a particular year
that, on the 25th of August, 26 varieties of potatoes were ripe on a
very dark-coloured sandy vegetable mould, 20 on an ordinary sandy soil,
19 on a loamy soil, and only 16 on a nearly white calcareous soil.
The tenacity of the soil is very variable, and indicates the great
differences in the amount of power which must be expended in working
them. According to Schuebler, a soil whose tenacity does not exceed 10,
is easily tilled, but when it reaches 40 it becomes very difficult and
heavy to work.
On examining the table it becomes manifest, that as far as its
mechanical properties are concerned, humus is a substance of the very
highest importance, for it confers on the soil, in a high degree, the
power of absorbing and retaining water, diminishes its tenacity and
permits its being more easily worked, adds to its hygrometric power and
property of absorbing oxygen from the air, and finally, from its dark
colour, causes the more rapid absorption of heat from the sun's rays. It
will be thus understood, that though it does not directly supply food to
the plant, it ministers indirectly in a most important manner to its
well-being, and that to so great an extent that it must be considered an
indispensable constituent of a fertile soil. But it is important to
observe that it must not be present in too large a quantity, for an
excess does away with all the good effects of a smaller supply, and
produces soils notorious for their infertility.
Such are the important physical properties of the soil, and it is
greatly to be desired that they should be more extensively examined. The
great labour which this involves has, however, hitherto prevented its
being done, and will, in all probability, render it impossible except in
a limited number of cases. Some of these characters are, however, of
minor importance, and for ordinary purposes it might be sufficient to
determine the specific gravity of the soil in the dry and moist state,
the power of imbibing and retaining water, its hygrometric power, its
tenacity, and its colour. With these data we should be in a condition to
draw probable conclusions regarding the others; for the higher the
specific gravity in the dry state, the greater is the power of the soil
to retain heat, and the darker its colour the more readily does it
absorb it. The greater its tenacity the more difficult is it to work,
and the greater difficulty will the roots of the young plant find in
pushing their way through it. The greater the power of imbibing water,
the more it shrinks in drying; and the more slowly the water evaporates,
the colder is the soil produced. The hygrometric power is so important a
character that Davy and other chemists have even believed it possible to
make it the measure of the fertility of a soil; but though this may be
true within certain limits, it must not be too broadly assumed, the
results of recent experiments by no means confirming the opinion in its
integrity, but indicating only some relation between the two.
_The Subsoil._--The term soil is strictly confined to that portion of
the surface turned over by the plough working at ordinary depth; which,
as a general rule, may be taken at 10 inches. The portion immediately
subjacent is called the subsoil, and it has considerable agricultural
importance, and requires a short notice. In many instances, soil and
subsoil are separated by a purely imaginary line, and no striking
difference can be observed either in their chemical or physical
characters. In such cases it has been the practice with some persons not
to limit the term soil to the upper portion, but to apply it to the
whole depth, however great it may be, which agrees in characters with
the upper part, and only to call that subsoil which manifestly differs
from it. This principle is perhaps theoretically the more correct, but
great practical advantages are derived from limiting the name of soil to
the depth actually worked in common agricultural operations. The subsoil
is always analogous in its general characters to a soil, but it may be
either identical with that which overlies it or not. Of the former,
striking illustrations are seen in the wheat subsoils, the analyses of
which have been already given. In the latter case great differences may
exist, and a heavy clay is often found lying on an open and porous sand,
or on peat, and _vice versa_. Even where the characters of the subsoil
appear the same as those of the soil, appreciable chemical differences
are generally observed, especially in the quantity of organic matter,
which is increased in the soil by the decay of plants growing upon it
and by the manure added. In general, then, all that we have said
regarding the characters of soils both chemically and physically, will
apply to the subsoils, except that, owing to the difficulty with which
the air reaches the latter, some minor peculiarities are observed. The
most important is the effect of the decay of vegetable matter, without
access of air, which is attended by the reduction of the peroxide of
iron to the state of protoxide, and not unfrequently by the production
of sulphuret of iron, compounds which are extremely prejudicial to
vegetation, and occasionally give rise to some difficulties when the
subsoil is brought to the surface, as we shall afterwards have to
notice.
The physical characters of the subsoil are often of much importance to
the soil itself. As, for instance, where a light soil lies on a clay
subsoil, in which case its value is much higher than if it reposed on an
open or sandy subsoil. And in many similar modes an important influence
is exerted; but these belong more strictly to the practical department
of agriculture, and need not be mentioned here.
_Classification of Soils._--Numerous attempts have been made to form a
classification of soils according to their characters and value, but
they have not hitherto proved very successful; and the result of more
recent chemical investigations has not been such as to encourage a
farther attempt. We have not at present data sufficient for the purpose,
nor, if we had, would it be possible to arrange any soil in its class
except after an elaborate chemical examination. The only classification
at present possible must be founded on the general physical characters
of the soil; and the ordinary mode followed in practice of dividing them
into clays, loams, etc. etc., which we need not here particularize,
fulfils all that can be done until we have more minute information
regarding a large number of soils. Those of our readers who desire more
full information on this point are referred to the works of Thaer,
Schuebler, and others, where the subject is minutely discussed.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote I: Transactions of the Highland and Agricultural Society, vol.
vi., p. 317.]