INDIVIDUAL EFFORT IN TRADE EXPANSION

ADDRESS AT THE PAN AMERICAN COMMERCIAL CONFERENCE

WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 17, 1911

Governments may hold doors open all over the world, but if there is no

one to go through them it is an empty form, and people get tired of

holding doors open as an empty form. The claims of a government to

consideration soon come to be regarded as pretentious unless there are

really substantial interests behind the claims. No government, and least

of all our government, least of all a democratic republic, can make

commerce to go through open doors, to avail itself of fair and equal

treatment, and to give substance and reality to the theoretical increase

of amity and friendship between nations. The people of the country must

do it themselves, and they must do it by individual enterprise; they

must do it by turning their attention toward the opportunities that are

afforded by friendly governments, by availing themselves of those

opportunities, and by carrying on their business through availing

themselves of them. But while it is a matter of individual enterprise,

while that must be the basis of all development and progress, all

advance, all extension, nevertheless, there must be something besides

the individual enterprise. The great principle of organization which is

revolutionizing the business and the social enterprise of the world,

applies here as it applies elsewhere. No single business can make very

much advance except as all other business of the country makes advance.

No one can go into a new field very far in advance of others; and the

way for each man to make his business successful in a new field is to

do his share as a member of the community, as a citizen of his country,

as one of the great business organizations of his country, to advance

the trade, the commerce, the influence of his country as a whole, in the

field into which he wishes to enter. A recognition of the dependence of

each man's business for its prosperity and progress upon the prosperity

and progress of the business of all is necessary in order that there be

real progress.

Now, there are governments which undertake actively to lead in this

direction, and they are governments which are making enormous progress.

Germany, a country regarding which Mr. White has just spoken in such apt

and appropriate terms, leads, and to a considerable extent in various

directions, it requires the combination of her manufacturers, her

producers, and her commercial concerns. Japan practically does also.

There is solidarity brought about by the wonderful organization of that

combination; so that it is one for all, and all for one, under

government leadership. We cannot do it here. Our country cannot take

that kind of lead. Our people do not conceive of that as a function of

government, and as far as the activities of our government are

concerned, they are largely engaged in breaking up organizations which

do increase the industrial efficiency of our country. I do not want to

be understood as criticising that. It is all right to break them up when

they are taking too great a portion of the field for themselves. It is

all right and important to break them up when they are monopolizing the

means of subsistence that should be spread throughout the great body of

the people. But we must recognize the fact that when our government does

enforce the law--a just law, wise law--against our great commercial and

our great industrial organizations, it reduces the industrial efficiency

of the country. There is only one way to counteract that effect, not

violating any law, but securing through organization the united action,

and concentrated action of great numbers of Americans who have a common

purpose, substituting that kind of organization for the organizations

which it is the duty of our government to break up, because they are

contrary to our laws.

I am much gratified by this meeting and by the association of so many

practical men, business men, who, by uniting, are really creating a new

force in this direction, upon which I am sure we ought to move.

Let me say one thing about the practical direction of your efforts. The

so-called Ship Subsidy bill has been reduced now to nothing but the

proposition that the Government should be authorized to pay out of the

profits of the ocean mail service adequate compensation to procure the

carriage of the mails by American steamers to South America; that is

what it has come down to. It passed the Senate, as Mr. White has said,

only by the casting of the vote of the Vice-President, and I do not know

what will be done with it in the House. I am afraid in these last days

that it may be lost in the shuffle.

There are two reasons why that perfectly simple and reasonable

proposition failed to carry a great majority of the Senate, and

fails--if it does fail--to be certain of passing the House. One is

because there is a difference between the people who want to have the

thing accomplished about the way in which it should be accomplished.

That is one of the most common things in the world. A certain set of men

who want to have a revival of our merchant marine, say the way to do it

is to pay subsidies, the way to do it is to equalize the differences

between the cost of maintaining and running an American ship and the

cost of maintaining and running a foreign ship, and to equal the

subsidies paid by practically all the other great commercial nations to

their steamship lines. Another set of men who equally desire to restore

our merchant marine, say that is not the right way; the right way is to

throw open the doors and enable our people to buy their ships abroad.

Still others say the true way is to authorize our ships to employ crews

and officers of the low-priced men of the world, relieve them from the

obligations imposed upon them in respect of the employment of Americans,

people of the United States, who will require the high standard of

living that has been produced in the United States by the operation of

our protective system, relieve them from the obligations which are

imposed upon them by our laws in regard to the requirements of the crew,

the air space, the food, and the treatment that a crew is to receive, so

that it will be cheaper to run an American ship. Now, between these

different sets of people, having different ideas of the way to

accomplish a thing, nothing is done; and that situation which exists so

frequently regarding so many measures will exist forever, unless there

is put behind the proposition a force that gives it a momentum to carry

it over such obstacles. Put force enough behind it so that the gentlemen

in the Senate and House of Representatives understand that they are

going to be held responsible by the American people, going to be held

responsible for not doing the thing, for not finding out some way to do

it, and they will come to this sensible conclusion very shortly, and

that is:

"We will settle the controversy about the way it should be done by

trying one thing first, and if that does not work, we will try the

other."

Another difficulty about this measure is that there is a difference in

appreciation of its importance in different parts of the country. Down

here on the seaboard I think most people do appreciate it. You

appreciate it; all the people who are concerned, or wish to be

concerned, in South American trade, or the trade of the Orient,

appreciate it; but you go back into the interior of the country, into

the great agricultural states of the Northwest, and the farther Middle

West, states along in the valley of the Mississippi and the Missouri,

and the people there are thinking about other things, and they have a

natural dislike for subsidies, and when told that a measure means giving

somebody else something for nothing, they express and impress upon their

representatives a great dislike for it. The way for us to get something

done is not for us who are in favor of it to talk to each other about

it. We can do that indefinitely without getting much farther. The way is

to take steps to bring to the minds of the people of the valley of the

Missouri and the Northwest, and those great agricultural states the

importance to them, as well as to us, of having our merchant marine

restored.

I noticed the other day that the people of San Francisco were justifying

their confidence in themselves by procuring all their business

correspondents in the state of New York to write letters to me in favor

of having the great "Exposition and Celebration of the Opening of the

Canal in San Francisco"; and these letters came in by the thousand from

my constituents. They became so tiresome that I came very near voting

against the project as a measure of revenge; but it showed the San

Francisco people understood where to go in order to preach their

doctrine. They did not talk to each other on the Pacific coast about it.

They came to New York and got their business correspondents interested

in it, and got them to talk to their representatives about it. That is

what you want to do in Kansas and Nebraska and Iowa and the Dakotas--you

want, through all the relations that you have, and by every means in

your power, to represent to the people of those great interior states,

who have but little direct relation with the ocean commerce of the

world, the real conditions under which we exist, and the importance to

the whole country of doing something; and if they do come to appreciate

the importance to the country of doing what you are talking about, then

they will be for it, for they are sincere, patriotic Americans.

There is but one thing more I want to say regarding the relations which

underlie the success of such an enterprise as you are now engaged in. Of

course, you have had a great amount of advice, and a great many speakers

have told you a great many things you know, and I am going to put myself

in line with the distinguished gentlemen who have preceded me by doing

the same thing. At the basis of all intercourse, commercial as well as

social, necessarily lies a genuine good understanding. That cannot be

simulated; the pretense of it is in general, in the long run, futile.

People trade with those with whom they have sympathy; they tend to trade

with their friends. The basis of all permanent commercial intercourse is

benefit to both parties--not that cut-throat relation which may exist

between enemies, where one is trying to do the other--and a relation

founded upon mutual respect, good understanding, sympathy, and

friendship; and the way to reach the condition which is thus essential

is by personal intercourse and acquaintance between the men of

Anglo-Saxon or German or Norse, or whatever race they may be, peopling

the United States, and the men of the Latin American race peopling the

countries of the South.

This is something, my friends, in which our people are very deficient.

So long have we been separated from the other nations of the earth that

one of our faults is a failure to appreciate the qualities of the people

who are unlike us. I have often had occasion to quote something that

Bret Harte said about the people of a frontier western camp, to whom

came a stranger who was regarded by them as having "the defective moral

quality of being a foreigner." Difference from us does not involve

inferiority to us. It may involve our inferiority to somebody else. The

sooner our business men open their minds to the idea that the peoples of

other countries, different races and speaking different languages and

with different customs and laws, are quite our equals, worthy of our

respect, worthy of our esteem, regard, and affection, the sooner we

shall reach a basis on which we can advance our commerce all over the

world. A little more modesty is a good thing for us occasionally; a

little appreciation of the good qualities of others--and let me tell you

that nowhere on earth are there more noble, admirable and lovable

qualities to be found among men than you will find among the people of

Latin America.

Gentlemen, I hope for you the effectiveness of a great and permanent

organization, and that you may advance the time when through more

perfect knowledge, through broader sympathies and a better

understanding, ties of commerce may bind together all our countries,

advance our wealth and prosperity and well-being with equal step as they

advance the wealth and prosperity and well-being of all those with whom

we deal, and increase the tie of that perfect understanding of other

peoples which is the condition of unbroken and permanent peace.

WELCOME TO THE LATIN AMERICAN PUBLICISTS TAKING PART IN THE SECOND PAN

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS

Latin America and the United States Addresses by Elihu Root · 第 224 / 229 题