CHAPTER VII

ANGLO-SAXON AND ANGLO-NORMAN ARCHITECTURE

In Great Britain, even more than on the Continent, the architecture of

the past reflects national character, its distinctive peculiarities

having been the outcome of local conditions differing widely from those

that obtained elsewhere, which largely modified the styles introduced

from without. On the arrival of the Romans in the first century of the

Christian era, there were, with the exception of the monoliths on

Salisbury plain known as Stonehenge and other prehistoric relics, the

origin of which has never yet been discovered, no buildings of greater

pretension than mud huts or circular stone or wooden houses with a hole

in the tapering roof through which air was admitted and smoke dispersed.

The houses, palaces, and churches erected by the invaders were, as

proved by the remains at Silchester, Wroxeter, and elsewhere, of the

type of those of Imperial Rome, and on them many British masons were

employed, who thus acquired a knowledge of the principles of

construction that stood their successors in good stead. Those

successors, however, showed no desire to perpetuate the style introduced

by the conquerors, and when the latter withdrew in the 5th century the

buildings they left behind them were allowed to fall into rapid decay.

[Illustration: Example of Saxon Arcading]

[Illustration: Example of Saxon Arcading]

Very quickly too did most of the converts to Christianity relapse into

heathenism, and although the lamp of faith was long kept burning in

Ireland and in Scotland, no trace exists of the churches in which the

little remnant of the followers of the Redeemer met for worship. Of

those built later under the auspices of Saints Augustine, Paulinus, and

other early bishops, not one escaped destruction, but there is strong

evidence to prove that they were of the basilican apsidal plan, that

never took very deep root in England, but was in many cases ousted by

the sanctuary with a square-shaped eastern extension.

It is usual to give the term Anglo-Saxon to all relics of buildings in

Great Britain, that can be proved to date from between the early 7th

century and 1066, but Pre-Conquest would be more strictly accurate,

Anglo-Saxon architects having contributed but little to the evolution of

style, for they were wanting in initiative, rarely trying experiments

with new features as was the constant custom of their Norman successors.

To this, however, there was one brilliant exception in Bishop Wilfrid of

York, who greatly improved the primitive church, built by King Edwin in

the capital of his see, that was later destroyed by fire, and erected

noble minsters at Hexham and Ripon, of which the fine crypts with

massive pillars still remain beneath the considerably later buildings.

In the south of England, too, there was considerable architectural

activity in the 7th and 8th centuries, whilst in the 9th the return of

King Egbert from his long exile at the Court of Charlemagne appears to

have led to the introduction in Wessex of the Oriental branch of the

Romanesque style to which the cathedral of Aix-la-Chapelle belongs.

[Illustration: Tower of Sompting Church, Sussex]

The chief characteristics of the so-called Anglo-Saxon style are the

great height in comparison with the length and breadth of a building, a

rectangular plan, massive square towers, unadorned angular or

semicircular arches, stunted clumsy-looking columns with roughly carved

or plain capitals, long narrow round-headed deeply recessed windows,

massive walls without internal decoration, with on the exterior a

somewhat ornate surface ornamentation, combined with a series of

peculiar clamps known as quoins at the angles of the walls, greatly

strengthening the structure. There were no aisles or transepts in early

Anglo-Saxon buildings, but the chancel was divided from the nave by an

arch sometimes with and sometimes without carving.

It is supposed that most of the early Anglo-Saxon churches were built of

wood, and at Greenstead in Essex an example remains of the mode in which

such buildings were constructed, though the probability is that none of

the original material remains. Of the stone buildings that succeeded

those in the more perishable material a few only are still in existence,

including the Abbey Church of Deerhurst near Towkesbury, the oldest

consecrated building still in use in England, the Tower of Earl's Barton

Church in Northamptonshire, parts of Barfreston Church, Kent, that has a

fine Norman doorway: Sompting Church, with the unusual feature of a

gabled tower with a spire, and that of Worth, both in Sussex, the latter

with rudimentary transepts and a semicircular apse, with which may be

mentioned S. Lawrence at Bradford-on-Avon, Wilts, of somewhat uncertain

but probably later date than any of these, for it has a square Eastern

end and decorative arcading on the upper portion of the walls, prophetic

of coming changes.

Certain portions of St. Martin's Church, Canterbury, notably a doorway

in the chancel and parts of the foundations, are supposed to have

belonged to a Saxon church of earlier date than the crypts of Hexham and

Ripon already referred to, and which was preceded by an even more

ancient building, one of the very first places of Christian worship

erected in England.

The so-called Pyx House in Westminster Abbey, a low narrow

solemn-looking vaulted room with a row of massive pillars in the centre,

and a single archway in the south transept, are all that are left of the

noble sanctuary built under the direction of the last of the Saxon

kings, but these relics, with a few conventual buildings, suffice to

connect with Anglo-Saxon times a church that is perhaps more intimately

associated than any other with the history of England from the close of

the 11th to the middle of the 16th century, it having been added to

under every successive occupant of the throne.

The Anglo-Norman style, that succeeded the Saxon, prevailed in Great

Britain from the conquest to the last decade of the 12th century,

becoming at that time either merged in or superseded by the earliest

phase of the Gothic.

Always most enthusiastic builders, the Normans found in the land of

their adoption fuller scope for their energies than in their own, and

before they became absorbed in the race they had conquered, they left

their impress throughout the length and breadth of their new domain,

monasteries, cathedrals, and parish churches, castles, and dwelling

houses rising up in every direction, all stamped with a most distinctive

character, the result of the welding into one of Anglo-Saxon and Norman

traditions, and the modification of a foreign style by local conditions

of material and environment. In many cases somewhat crude and heavy,

Norman work has yet always an imposing dignity, and is, as a general

rule, admirably suited to the site it occupies and the purpose for which

it is intended.

[Illustration: Plan of Norman Church]

[Illustration: Norman Capital. White Tower, London]

[Illustration: Base and Capital of Norman Pillar]

[Illustration: Norman Capital]

[Illustration: Norman Arcading]

[Illustration: Norman Window]

[Illustration: Norman Arcading]

[Illustration: Norman Window]

[Illustration: Norman Window]

The chief characteristics of Anglo-Norman ecclesiastical buildings are a

cruciform plan; the great length in comparison with the breadth of the

nave, which joins the choir without the intervention of a screen, such

screens as are _in situ_ being of much later date than the churches in

which they are found; columns of greater girth and height than the Saxon

type, some circular, others six or eight sided, the circular type

occasionally clustered in groups of six or more, with roughly carved

capitals of which the so-called cushion form is of most frequent

occurrence, upholding arches of wide span, massive walls, those of the

nave with rows of purely ornamental arcading, beautifully proportioned

triforia and clerestories; long, narrow, round-headed windows, two or

three being often grouped together; deeply recessed and finely decorated

doorways; strong external buttresses; twin western towers and a loftier

central one rising from the intersection of nave and transepts. With

certain notable exceptions referred to below, Norman churches have flat

timber roofs, but those of the crypt beneath them are generally of

groined stone with plain or only slightly ornamented ribs.

[Illustration: Norman Window]

[Illustration: Norman Doorway]

Another very distinctive characteristic of the Norman style is the

richness of the surface decoration of the interiors of cathedrals and

churches, the bases, shafts, and capitals of the columns, the arches,

headings of windows, mural arcades, &c. being all enriched with

mouldings of an infinite variety of form, including the so-called cable

resembling a rope, the billet not unlike short bits of rounded wood, the

chevron or zig-zag, the fret or fillet, the lozenge, the trellis, the

cone, the scollop, and wave with the so-called torus, a convex swelling,

and the cavetto, a hollow moulding, the last two used almost exclusively

on the bases of columns.

[Illustration: Norman Buttress]

[Illustration: Cable Moulding]

[Illustration: Billet Moulding]

[Illustration: Chevron or Zig-zag Moulding]

[Illustration: Diamond or Lozenge Moulding]

[Illustration: Trellis Moulding]

[Illustration: Cone Moulding]

[Illustration: Scollop Moulding]

Among noteworthy existing examples of the Anglo-Norman style are the

nave, transepts and western doorway of Hereford Cathedral; the choir,

transepts, and nave of Peterborough Cathedral; the naves of Gloucester,

Exeter, Chichester, and Ely Cathedrals; certain portions of Canterbury

Cathedral, including the choir chapels, part of the cloisters, the

baptistery tower, S. Anselm's Tower, and a fine staircase leading up

from the Close; the Chapter House of Worcester Cathedral; the greater

part of Norwich Cathedral, which, though it has the French chevet at the

eastern end, combines with it the distinctive English characteristics of

a nave of great length and long transepts, the former with fourteen

noble bays; the naves of S. Alban's Abbey, Southwell Minster, and the

Priory Church of Christchurch, Hants; portions of the nave and transepts

and the central tower of Christchurch Cathedral, Oxford; the beautiful

portal of Tewkesbury Abbey, the finest in England, and the doorway of

Hales Church, Norfolk, on which may be seen many of the characteristic

mouldings enumerated above.

[Illustration: Norman Church at Kilpeck]

Somewhat later in date and even more distinctively Anglo-Norman than the

examples quoted above, is the noble Cathedral of Durham, in which the

style reached its fullest culmination. It remains, with the exception of

the so-called Chapel of the Nine Altars that replaces the original apse,

very much what it was when first completed, and reflects the national

unity that was becoming ever more and more complete whilst it was being

erected. A very noteworthy feature of this most effective building, in

which every detail is subordinated to the general effect, is the vaulted

roof of the nave, one of the very few dating from Norman times,

significant of the approaching revolt against the flat roofs that had so

long been looked upon as essential. In spite of certain crudities of

structure it harmonises well alike with the vaulting of the aisles and

transepts of earlier, and of the choir of somewhat later date. The great

clustered piers alternating with cylindrical columns, the fine arches

spanning them, the beautiful triforia and clerestories, and above all

the long vista of nave and choir, combine to place Durham Cathedral in

the very highest rank amongst contemporary buildings either in England

or on the Continent, whilst in the Galilee Chapel, to which a porch,

replacing an earlier entrance, gives access, the details of the

transitional Norman style can be very clearly studied, the graceful

intersecting arches, upheld by slender coupled columns, recently

supplemented by additional supports, enriched with characteristic

mouldings, shadowing forth the approaching change to the early English

phase of Gothic.

Winchester Cathedral, originally a very typical Norman building designed

by William of Wykeham, retains its Norman framework, covered over, as it

were, with a drapery of detail in the latest development of English

Gothic, and with it may be named as characteristic Norman buildings with

Gothic additions, Peterborough Cathedral, all Norman except the west

front and eastern extremity of the choir; Malmesbury Abbey, with a

flat-roofed nave and vaulted aisles, the latter with pointed arches; the

Cathedral of Exeter; the Minster of Sherbourne; and portions of

Westminster Abbey.

Many parish churches, too, including those of Kilpeck in Herefordshire,

a very typical Norman building; Tickencote in Lincolnshire, with

intersecting pointed arches; S. Peter's in the East, Oxford, with a

groined vaulted roof; Barfreston Church, Kent, with a very beautiful

recessed doorway; Goring and Iffley in Oxfordshire; and above all, S.

Bartholomew's in London, date from Norman times, and, though they have

all been more or less modified by restoration, retain the general

characteristics of the period to which they belong.

[Illustration: Plan of Peterborough Cathedral]

Anglo-Norman secular architecture is characterised by much the same

qualities as ecclesiastical, the castles and residences of the

sovereigns and the nobles having been of dignified and impressive

appearance, well proportioned, and thoroughly in harmony with their

surroundings. During the reigns of the Conqueror and his successors many

noble strongholds were erected on points of vantage. The most important

feature, and in every case the first to be built, having been the lofty

central keep or donjon, the home of its owner in peace, and the last

refuge of a besieged garrison in time of war. In it was a fine hall, in

which the host received his guests, with a raised platform known as the

dais for the use of those of high rank, and the approach to it was

protected by a complex series of defences, including deep ditches or

fosses, walls with towers and turrets at intervals, forming two distinct

enclosures known as the outer and inner baileys, often covering a vast

extent of ground, the whole encircled by a deep moat that could be

filled with water when necessary. The great main entrance was flanked by

towers, and in connection with the heavy doors of solid oak was a

portcullis, that is to say, a grating of timber and iron bristling with

spikes, that could be drawn up from within, cutting off all access to

the inner precincts.

Some few Norman castles, all considerably modified to suit modern

requirements, are still in use as residences or public buildings,

including those of Windsor, Warwick (both specially typical), Norwich,

Dover, Richmond in Yorkshire, and the Tower of London; the keep of the

last named (known as the White Tower) and the chapel dedicated to S.

John being amongst the best examples of the Anglo-Norman style in

existence; whilst at Rochester, Colchester, Croft, Headingham, and

Kenilworth are extensive remains of other strongholds, that before they

fell into decay, must have equalled in grandeur those of Windsor and

Warwick. A very remarkable example of a private residence dating from

Norman times is Haddon Hall in Derbyshire, the seat of the Duke of

Rutland, which retains the original great hall with a dais and

minstrels' gallery, and a number of fine suites of rooms to which

various wings were added during the 13th, 14th, and 15th centuries,

affording an excellent opportunity for the study of the development of

English domestic architecture.

Architecture(#33589) · 第 7 / 11 章