THE LIFE OF CNAEUS JULIUS AGRICOLA.

[1] Rutilius was consul B.C. 104; and for his upright life and great

strictness was banished B.C. 92. Tacitus is the only writer who says he

wrote his own life. Athenaeus mentions that he wrote a history of the

affairs of Rome in the Greek language. Scaurus was consul B.C. 114, and

again B.C. 106. He is the same Scaurus whom Sallust mentions as having

been bribed by Jugurtha. As the banishment of Rutilius took place on the

accusation of Scaurus, it is possible that, when the former wrote his

life, the latter also wrote his, in order to defend himself from charges

advanced against him.

[2] _Venia opus fuit_. This whole passage has greatly perplexed the

critics. The text is disputed, and it is not agreed why Tacitus asks

indulgence. Brotier, Dronke, and others, say he asks indulgence for the

inferiority of his style and manner _(incondita ac rudi voce_, c. 3), as

compared with the distinguished authors (_quisque celeberrimus_) of an

earlier and better age. But there would have been no less occasion to

apologize for that, if the times he wrote of had not been so hostile to

virtue. Hertel, La Bletterie, and many French critics, understand

that he apologizes for writing the memoir of his father-in-law so late

(_nunc_), when he was already dead (_defuncti_), instead of doing it,

as the great men of a former day did, while the subject of their memoirs

was yet alive; and he pleads, in justification of the delay, that he

could not have written it earlier without encountering the dangers of

that cruel age (the age of Domitian). This makes a very good sense.

The only objection against it is, that the language, _opus fuit_, seems

rather to imply that it was necessary to justify himself for writing

it at all, by citing the examples of former distinguished writers of

biography, as he had done in the foregoing introduction. But why would

it have been unnecessary to apologize for writing the life of Agricola,

if the times in which he lived had not been so unfriendly to virtue?

Because then Agricola would have had opportunity to achieve victories

and honors, which would have demanded narration, but for which the

jealousy and cruelty of Domitian now gave no scope. This is the

explanation of Roth; and he supports it by reference to the fact,

that the achievements of Agricola in the conquest of Britain, though

doubtless just as Tacitus has described them, yet occupy so small

a space in general history, that they are not even mentioned by any

ancient historian except Dio Cassius; and he mentions them chiefly out

of regard to the discovery made by Agricola, for the first time, that

Britain was an island (Vid. R. Exc. 1.) This explanation answers all the

demands of grammar and logic; but as a matter of taste and feeling, I

cannot receive it. Such an apology for the unworthiness of his subject

at the commencement of the biography, ill accords with the tone of

dignified confidence which pervades the memoir. The best commentary I

have seen on the passage is that of Walther; and it would not, perhaps,

be giving more space to so mooted a question than the scholar requires,

to extract it entire:--"_Venia_," he says, "is here nothing else than

what we, in the language of modesty, call an apology, and has respect

to the very justification he has just offered in the foregoing exordium.

For Tacitus there appeals to the usage, not of remote antiquity only,

but of later times also, to justify his design of writing the biography

of a distinguished man. There would have been no need of such an apology

in other times. In other times, dispensing with all preamble, he would

have begun, as in c. 4, 'Cnaeus Julius Agricola,' &c., assured that no

one would question the propriety of his course. But now, after a long

and servile silence, when one begins again 'facta moresque posteris

tradere,' when he utters the first word where speech and almost

memory (c. 2) had so long been lost, when he stands forth as the first

vindicator of condemned virtue, he seems to venture on something so new,

so strange, so bold, that it may well require apology." In commenting

upon _cursaturus--tempora_, Walther adds: "If there is any boldness in

the author's use of words here, that very fact suits the connection,

that by the complexion of his language even, he might paint the audacity

'cursandi tam saeva et infesta virtutibus tempora'--of running over (as

in a race, for such is Walther's interpretation of _cursandi_) times

so cruel and so hostile to virtue. Not that those times could excite

in Tacitus any real personal fear, for they were past, and he could now

think what he pleased, and speak what he thought (Hist. i. 1). Still

he shudders at the recollection of those cruelties; and he treads with

trembling footstep, as it were, even the path lately obstructed by them.

He looks about him to see whether, even now, he may safely utter his

voice, and he timidly asks pardon for venturing to break the reigning

silence."--_Tyler_.

[3] A passage in Dio excellently illustrates the fact here referred

to: "He (Domitian) put to death Rusticus Arulenus, because he studied

philosophy, and had given Thrasea the appellation of holy; and Herennius

Senecio, because, although he lived many years after serving the office

of quaestor, he solicited no other post, and because he had written

the Life of Helvidius Priscus." (lxvii. p. 765.) With less accuracy,

Suetonius, in his Life of Domitian (s. 10), says: "He put to death

Junius Rusticus, because he had published the panegyrics of Paetus

Thrasea and Helvidius Priscus, and had styled them most holy persons;

and on this occasion he expelled all the philosophers from the city,

and from. Italy." Arulenus Rusticus was a Stoic; on which account he was

contumeliously called by M. Regulus "the ape of the Stoics, marked with

the Vitellian scar." (Pliny, Epist. i. 5.) Thrasea, who killed Nero, is

particularly recorded in the Annals, book xvi.

[4] The expulsion of the philosophers, mentioned in the passage above

quoted from Suetonius.

[5] This truly happy period began when, after the death of Domitian,

and the recision of his acts, the imperial authority devolved on Nerva,

whose virtues were emulated by the successive emperors, Trajan, Hadrian,

and both the Antonines.

[6] _Securitas publica_, "the public security," was a current expression

and wish, and was frequently inscribed on medals.

[7] The term of Domitian's reign.

[8] It appears that at this time Tacitus proposed to write not only the

books of his History and Annals, which contain the "memorial of past

servitude," but an account of the "present blessings" exemplified in the

occurrences under Nerva and Trajan.

[9] There were two Roman colonies of this name; one in Umbria, supposed

to be the place now called Friuli; the other in Narbonnensian Gaul, the

modern name of which is Frejus. This last was probably the birth-place

of Agricola.

[10] Of the procurators who were sent to the provinces, some had the

charge of the public revenue; others, not only of that, but of the

private revenue of the emperor. These were the imperial procurators. All

the offices relative to the finances were in the possession of the Roman

knights; of whom the imperial procurators were accounted noble. Hence

the equestrian nobility of which Tacitus speaks. In some of the lesser

provinces, the procurators had the civil jurisdiction, as well at the

administration of the revenue. This was the case in Judaea.

[11] Seneca bears a very honorable testimony to this person, "If," says

he, "we have occasion for an example of a great mind, let us cite that

of Julius Graecinus, an excellent person, whom Caius Caesar put to death

on this account alone, that he was a better man than could be suffered

under a tyrant." (De Benef. ii. 21.) His books concerning Vineyards are

commended by Columella and Pliny.

[12] Caligula.

[13] Marcus Silanus was the father of Claudia, the first wife of Caius.

According to the historians of that period, Caius was jealous of him,

and took every opportunity of mortifying him. Tacitus (Hist. iv. 48)

mentions that the emperor deprived him of the military command of the

troops in Africa in an insulting manner. Dion (lix.) states, that when,

from his age and rank, Silanus was usually asked his opinion first in

the senate, the emperor found a pretext for preventing this respect;

being paid to MS worth. Suetonius (iv. 23) records that the emperor one

day put to sea in a hasty manner, and commanded Silanus to follow him.

This, from fear of illness, he declined to do; upon which the emperor,

alleging that he stayed on shore in order to get possession of the

city in case any accident befell himself, compelled him to cut his own

throat. It would seem, from the present passage of Tacitus, that there

were some legal forms taken in the case of Silanus, and that Julius

Graecinus was ordered to be the accuser; and that that noble-minded

man, refusing to take part in proceedings so cruel and iniquitous, was

himself put to death.

[14] Of the part the Roman matrons took in the education of youth,

Tacitus has given an elegant and interesting account, in his Dialogue

concerning Oratory, c. 28.

[15] Now Marseilles. This was a colony of the Phocaeans; whence it

derived that Grecian politeness for which it was long famous.

[16] It was usual for generals to admit young men of promising

characters to this honorable companionship, which resembled the office

of an aide-de-camp in the modern service. Thus, Suetonius informs us

that Caesar made his first campaign in Asia as tent-companion to Marcus

Thermus the praetor.

[17] This was the fate of the colony of veterans at Camalodunum, now

Colchester or Maldon. A particular account of this revolt is given in

the 14th book of the Annals.

[18] This alludes to the defeat of Petilius Cerialis, who came with the

ninth legion to succor the colony of Camalodunum. All the infantry were

slaughtered; and Petilius, with the cavalry alone, got away to the camp.

It was shortly after this, that Suetonius defeated Boadicea and her

forces.

[19] Those of Nero.

[20] The office of quaestor was the entrance to all public employments.

The quaestors and their secretaries were distributed by lot to the

several provinces, that there might be no previous connections between

them and the governors, but they might serve as checks upon each other.

[21] Brother of the emperor Otho.

[22] At the head of the praetors, the number of whom was different at

different periods of the empire, were the Praetor Urbanus, and Praetor

Peregrinus. The first administered justice among the citizens, the

second among strangers. The rest presided at public debates, and had the

charge of exhibiting the public games, which were celebrated with

great solemnity for seven successive days, and at a vast expense. This,

indeed, in the times of the emperors, was almost the sole business of

the praetors, whose dignity, as Tacitus expresses it, consisted in the

idle trappings of state; whence Boethius justly terms the praetorship

"an empty name, and a grievous burthen on the senatorian rank."

[23] Nero had plundered the temples for the supply of his extravagance

and debauchery. See Annals, xv. 45.

[24] This was the year of Rome 822; from the birth of Christ, 69.

[25] The cruelties and depredations committed on the coast of Italy by

this fleet are described in lively colors by Tacitus, Hist. ii. 12, 13.

[26] Now the county of Vintimiglia. The attack upon the municipal town

of this place, called Albium Intemelium, is particularly mentioned in

the passage above referred to.

[27] In the month of July of this year.

[28] The twentieth legion, surnamed the Victorious, was stationed in

Britain at Deva, the modern Chester, where many inscriptions and other

monuments of Roman antiquities have been discovered.

[29] Roscius Caelius. His disputes with the governor of Britain,

Trebellius Maximus, are related by Tacitus, Hist. i. 60.

[30] The governors of the province, and commanders in chief over all the

legions stationed in it.

[31] He had formerly been commander of the ninth legion.

[32] The province of Aquitania extended from the Pyrenean mountains to

the river Liger (Loire).

[33] The governors of the neighboring provinces.

[34] Agricola was consul in the year of Rome 830, A.D. 77, along with

Domitian. They succeeded, in the calends of July, the consuls Vespasian

and Titus, who began the year.

[35] He was admitted into the Pontifical College, at the head of which

was the Pontifex Maximus.

[36] Julius Caesar, Livy, Strabo, Fabius Rusticus, Pomponius Mela,

Pliny, &c.

[37] Thus Caesar: "One side of Britain inclines towards Spain, and the

setting sun; on which part Ireland is situated."--Bell. Gall. v. 13.

[38] These, as well as other resemblances suggested by ancient

geographers, have been mostly destroyed by the greater accuracy of

modern maps.

[39] This is so far true, that the northern extremity of Scotland is

much narrower than the southern coast of England.

[40] The Orkney Islands. These, although now first thoroughly known to

the Romans, had before been heard of, and mentioned by authors. Thus

Mela, in. 6: "There are thirty of the Orcades, separated from each other

by narrow straits." And Pliny, iv. 16: "The Orcades are forty in number,

at a small distance from each other." In the reign of Claudius, the

report concerning these islands was particularly current, and adulation

converted it into the news of a victory. Hence Hieronymus in his

Chronicon says, "Claudius triumphed over the Britons, and added the

Orcades to the Roman empire."

[41] Camden supposes the Shetland Islands to be meant here by Thule;

others imagine it to have been one of the Hebrides. Pliny, iv. 16,

mentions Thule as the most remote of all known islands; and, by placing

it but one day's sail from the Frozen Ocean, renders it probable that

Iceland was intended. Procopius (Bell. Goth, ii. 15) speaks of another

Thule, which must have been Norway, which many of the ancients thought

to be an island. Mr. Pennant supposes that the Thule here meant was

Foula, a very lofty isle, one of the most westerly of the Shetlands,

which might easily be descried by the fleet.

[42] As far as the meaning of this passage can be elucidated, it would

appear as if the first circumnavigators of Britain, to enhance the idea

of their dangers and hardships, had represented the Northern sea as

in such a thickened half solid state, that the oars could scarcely be

worked, or the water agitated by winds. Tacitus, however, rather chooses

to explain its stagnant condition from the want of winds, and the

difficulty of moving so great a body of waters. But the fact, taken

either way, is erroneous; as this sea is never observed frozen, and is

remarkably stormy and tempestuous.--_Aiken_.

[43] The great number of firths and inlets of the sea, which almost cut

through the northern parts of the island, as well as the height of the

tides on the coast, render this observation peculiarly proper.

[44] Caesar mentions that the interior inhabitants of Britain were

supposed to have originated in the island itself. (Bell. Gall. v. 12.)

[45] Caledonia, now Scotland, was at that time overspread by vast

forests. Thus Pliny, iv. 16, speaking of Britain, says, that "for thirty

years past the Roman arms had not extended the knowledge of the island

beyond the Caledonian forest."

[46] Inhabitants of what are now the counties of Glamorgan, Monmouth,

Brecknock, Hereford, and Radnor.

[47] The Iberi were a people of Spain, so called from their neighborhood

to the river Iberus, now Ebro.

[48] Of these, the inhabitants of Kent are honorably mentioned by

Caesar. "Of all these people, by far the most civilized are those

inhabiting the maritime country of Cantium, who differ little in their

manners from the Gauls."--Bell. Gall. v. 14.

[48] From the obliquity of the opposite coasts of England and France,

some part of the former runs further south than the northern extremity

of the latter.

[50] Particularly the mysterious and bloody solemnities of the Druids.

[51] The children were born and nursed in this ferocity. Thus Solinus,

c. 22, speaking of the warlike nation of Britons, says, "When a woman

is delivered of a male child, she lays its first food upon the husband's

sword, and with the point gently puts it within the little one's mouth,

praying to her country deities that his death may in like manner be in

the midst of arms."

[52] In the reign of Claudius.

[53] The practice of the Greeks in the Homeric age was the reverse of

this.

[54] Thus the kings Cunobelinus, Caractacus, and Prasutagus, and the

queens Cartismandua and Boadicea, are mentioned in different parts of

Tacitus.

[55] Caesar says of Britain, "the climate is more temperate than that of

Gaul, the cold being less severe." (Bell. Gall. v. 12.) This certainly

proceeds from its insular situation, and the moistness of its

atmosphere.

[56] Thus Pliny (ii. 75):--"The longest day in Italy is of fifteen

hours, in Britain of seventeen, where in summer the nights are light."

[57] Tacitus, through the medium of Agricola, must have got this report,

either from the men of Scandinavia, or from those of the Britons who had

passed into that country, or been informed to this effect by those who

had visited it. It is quite true, that in the further part of Norway,

and so also again in Iceland and the regions about the North Pole, there

is, at the summer solstice, an almost uninterrupted day for nearly two

months. Tacitus here seems to affirm this as universally the case, not

having heard that, at the winter solstice, there is a night of equal

duration.

[58] Tacitus, after having given the report of the Britons as he had

heard it, probably from Agricola, now goes on to state his own views

on the subject. He represents that, as the far north is level, there is

nothing, when the sun is in the distant horizon, to throw up a shadow

towards the sky: that the light, indeed, is intercepted from the surface

of the earth itself, and so there is darkness upon it; but that the sky

above is still clear and bright from its rays. And hence he supposes

that the brightness of the upper regions neutralizes the darkness on the

earth, forming a degree of light equivalent to the evening twilight or

the morning dawn, or, indeed, rendering it next to impossible to decide

when the evening closes and the morning begins. Compare the following

account, taken from a "Description of a Visit to Shetland," in vol.

viii. of Chambers' Miscellany:--"Being now in the 60th degree of north

latitude, daylight could scarcely be said to have left us during the

night, and at 2 o'clock in the morning, albeit the mist still hung about

us, we could see as clearly as we can do in London, at about any hour in

a November day."

[59] Mr. Pennant has a pleasing remark concerning the soil and climate

of our island, well agreeing with that of Tacitus:--"The climate of

Great Britain is above all others productive of the greatest variety and

abundance of wholesome vegetables, which, to crown our happiness, are

almost equally diffused through all its parts: this general fertility

is owing to those clouded skies, which foreigners mistakenly urge as a

reproach on our country: but let us cheerfully endure a temporary gloom,

which clothes not only our meadows, but our hills, with the richest

verdure."--Brit. Zool. 4to. i. 15.

[60] Strabo (iv. 138) testifies the same. Cicero, on the other hand,

asserts, that not a single grain of silver is found on this island. (Ep.

ad Attic, iv. 16.) If we have recourse to modern authorities, we

find Camden mentioning gold and silver mines in Cumberland, silver in

Flintshire, and gold in Scotland. Dr. Borlase (Hist. of Cornwall, p.

214) relates, that so late as the year 1753, several pieces of gold

were found in what the miners call stream tin; and silver is now got in

considerable quantity from several of our lead ores. A curious paper,

concerning the Gold Mines of Scotland, is given by Mr. Pennant in

Append. (No. x.) to his second part of a "Tour in Scotland in 1772," and

a much more general account of the mines and ores of Great Britain in

early times, in his "Tour in Wales of 1773," pp. 51-66.

[61] Camden mentions pearls being found in the counties of Caernarvon

and Cumberland, and in the British sea. Mr. Pennant, in his "Tour in

Scotland in 1769," takes notice of a considerable pearl fishery out of

the fresh-water mussel, in the vicinity of Perth, from whence 10,000_l._

worth of pearls were sent to London from 1761 to 1764. It was, however,

almost exhausted when he visited the country. See also the fourth volume

of Mr. Pennant's Br. Zool. (Class vi. No. 18), where he gives a much

more ample account of the British pearls. Origen, in his Comment. on

Matthew, pp. 210, 211, gives a description of the British pearl, which,

he says, was next in value to the Indian;--"Its surface is of a gold

color, but it is cloudy, and less transparent than the Indian." Pliny

speaks of the British unions as follows:--"It is certain that small and

discolored ones are produced in Britain; since the deified Julius has

given us to understand that the breastplate which he dedicated to Venus

Genitrix, and placed in her temple, was made of British pearls."--ix.

35.

[62] Caesar's two expeditions into Britain were in the years of Rome

699 and 700. He himself gives an account of them, and they are also

mentioned by Strabo and Dio.

[63] It was the wise policy of Augustus not to extend any further the

limits of the empire; and with regard to Britain, in particular, he

thought the conquest and preservation of it would be attended with more

expense than it could repay. (Strabo, ii. 79, and iv. 138.) Tiberius,

who always professed an entire deference for the maxims and injunctions

of Augustus, in this instance, probably, was convinced of their

propriety.

[64] Caligula.

[65] Claudius invaded Britain in the year of Rome 796, A.D. 43.

[66] In the parish of Dinder, near Hereford, are yet remaining the

vestiges of a Roman encampment, called Oyster-hill, as is supposed from

this Ostorius. Camden's Britain, by Gibson, p. 580.

[67] That of Camalodunum, now Colchester, or Maldon.

[68] The Mona of Tacitus is the Isle of Anglesey, that of Caesar is the

Isle of Man, called by Pliny Monapia.

[69] The avarice of Catus Decidianus the procurator is mentioned as the

cause by which the Britons were forced into this war, by Tacitus, Annal.

xiv. 32.

[70] Julius Classicianus, who succeeded Decidianus, was at variance with

the governor, but was no less oppressive to the province.

[71] By the slaughter of Varus.

[72] The Rhine and Danube.

[73] Boadicea, whose name is variously written Boudicea, Bonduca,

Voadicea, &c., was queen of the Iceni, or people of Suffolk, Norfolk,

Cambridgeshire, and Huntingdonshire. A particular account of this revolt

is given in the Annals, xiv. 31, and seq.

[74] Of Camalodunum.

[75] This was in A.D. 61. According to Tac. Hist. i. 6, Petronius

Turpilianus was put to death by Galba, A.D. 68.

[76] The date of his arrival is uncertain.

[77] He was sent to Britain by Vespasian, A.D. 69.

[78] The Brigantes inhabited Yorkshire, Lancashire, Westmoreland,

Cumberland, and Durham.

[79] The date of his arrival in Britain is uncertain. This Frontinus

is the author of the work on "Stratagems," and, at the time of his

appointment to the lieutenancy of Britain, he was _curator aquarum_ at

Rome. This, probably, it was that induced him to write his other work on

the aqueducts of Rome.

[80] This seems to relate to his having been curtailed in his military

operations by the parsimony of Vespasian, who refused him permission to

attack other people than the Silures. See c. 11.

[81] Where these people inhabited is mentioned in p. 355, note 5.

[82] This was in the year of Rome 831, of Christ 78.

[83] Inhabitants of North Wales, exclusive of the Isle of Anglesey.

[84] _I.e._ Some were for immediate action, others for delay. Instead

of _et quibus_, we read with Dr. Smith's edition (London, 1850), _ut

quibus_.

[85] _Vexilla_ is here used for _vexillarii_. "Under the Empire the name

of Vexillarii was given to a distinct body of soldiers supposed to have

been composed of veterans, who were released from the military oath and

regular service, but kept embodied under a separate flag (_vexillum_),

to render assistance to the army if required, guard the frontier,

and garrison recently conquered provinces; a certain number of these

supernumeraries being attached to each legion. (Tac. Hist. ii. 83, 100;

Ann. i. 36.)"--Rich, Comp. to Dict. and Lex. s. v. Vexillum.

[86] A pass into the vale of Clwyd, in the parish of Llanarmon, is still

called Bwlch Agrikle, probably from having been occupied by Agricola, in

his road to Mona.--_Mr. Pennant_.

[87] From this circumstance it would appear that these auxiliaries were

Batavians, whose skill in this practice is related by Tacitus, Hist. iv.

12.

[88] It was customary for the Roman generals to decorate with sprigs of

laurel the letters in which they sent home the news of any remarkable

success. Thus Pliny, xv. 30: "The laurel, the principal messenger of joy

and victory among the Romans, is affixed to letters, and to the spears

and javelins of the soldiers." The _laurus_ of the ancients was probably

the baytree, and not what we now call laurel.

[89] _Ascire_, al. _accire_, "To receive into regular service." The

reference is to the transfer of soldiers from the supernumeraries to

the legions. So Walch, followed by Dronke, Both, and Walther. The next

clause implies, that he took care to receive into the service none but

the best men (_optimum quemque_), who, he was confident, would prove

faithful (_fidelissimum_).

[90] In like manner Suetonius says of Julius Caesar, "He neither noticed

nor punished every crime; but while he strictly inquired into and

rigorously punished desertion and mutiny, he connived at other

delinquencies."--Life of Julius Caesar, s. 67.

[91] Many commentators propose reading "exaction," instead of

"augmentation." But the latter may be suffered to remain, especially as

Suetonius informs us that "Vespasian, not contented with renewing some

taxes remitted under Galba, added new and heavy ones: and augmented the

tributes paid by the provinces, even doubling some."--Life of Vesp. s.

19.

[92] In the year of Rome 832. A.D. 79.

[93] Many vestiges of these or other Roman camps yet remain in different

parts of Great Britain. Two principal ones, in the county of Annandale,

in Scotland, called Burnswork and Middleby, are described at large by

Gordon in his Itiner. Septentrion, pp. 16, 18.

[94] The year of Rome 833, A.D. 80.

[95] Now the Firth of Tay.

[96] The principal of these was at Ardoch, seated so as to command the

entrance into two valleys, Strathallan and Strathearn. A description

and plan of its remains, still in good preservation, are given by Mr.

Pennant in his Tour in Scotland in 1772, part ii. p. 101.

[97] The year of Rome 834, A.D. 81.

[98] The Firths of Clyde and Forth.

[99] The neck of land between these opposite arms of the sea is only

about thirty miles over. About fifty-five years after Agricola had left

the island, Lollius Urbicus, governor of Britain under Antoninus Pius,

erected a vast wall or rampart, extending from Old Kirkpatrick on the

Clyde, to Caeridden, two miles west of Abercorn, on the Forth, a space

of nearly thirty-seven miles, defended by twelve or thirteen forts.

These are supposed to have been on the site of those of Agricola. This

wall is usually called Graham's dike; and some parts of it are now

subsisting.

[100] The year of Rome 835, A.D. 82.

[101] Crossing the Firth of Clyde, or Dumbarton Bay, and turning to the

western coast of Argyleshire, or the Isles of Arran and Bute.

[102] The Bay of Biscay.

[103] The Mediterranean.

[104] The year of Rome 836, A.D. 83.

[105] The eastern parts of Scotland, north of the Firth of Forth, where

now are the counties of Fife, Kinross, Perth, Angus, &c.

[106] This legion, which had been weakened by many engagements, was

afterwards recruited, and then called Gemina. Its station at this affair

is supposed by Gordon to have been Lochore in Fifeshire. Mr. Pennant

rather imagines the place of the attack to have been Comerie in

Perthshire.

[107] For an account of these people see Manners of the Germans, c. 32.

[108] Mr. Pennant had a present made him in Skye, of a brass sword and a

denarius found in that island. Might they not have been lost by some of

these people in one of their landings?

[109] The Rhine.

[110] This extraordinary expedition, according to Dio, set out from the

western side of the island. They therefore must have coasted all that

part of Scotland, must have passed the intricate navigation through the

Hebrides, and the dangerous strait of Pentland Firth, and, after coming

round to the eastern side, must have been driven to the mouth of the

Baltic Sea, Here they lost their ships; and, in their attempt to proceed

homeward by land, were seized as pirates, part by the Suevi, and the

rest by the Frisii.

[111] The year of Rome 837, A.D. 84.

[112] The scene of this celebrated engagement is by Gordon (Itin.

Septent.) supposed to be in Strathern, near a place now called the

Kirk of Comerie, where are the remains of two Roman camps. Mr. Pennant,

however, in his Tour in 1772, part ii. p. 96, gives reasons which appear

well founded for dissenting from Gordon's opinion.

[113] The more usual spelling of this name is Galgacus; but the other is

preferred as of better authority.

[114] "Peace given to the world" is a very frequent inscription on the

Roman medals.

[115] It was the Roman policy to send the recruits raised in the

provinces to some distant country, for fear of their desertion or

revolt.

[116] How much this was the fate of the Romans themselves, when, in

the decline of the empire, they were obliged to pay tribute to the

surrounding barbarians, is shown in lively colors by Salvian:--"We call

that a gift which is a purchase, and a purchase of a condition the most

hard and miserable. For all captives, when they are once redeemed,

enjoy their liberty: we are continually paying a ransom, yet are never

free."--De Gubern. Dei, vi.

[118] The expedition of Claudius into Britain was in the year of Rome

796, from which to the period of this engagement only forty-two years

were elapsed. The number fifty therefore is given oratorically rather

than accurately.

[119] The Latin word used here, _covinarius_, signifies the driver of

a _covinus_, or chariot, the axle of which was bent into the form of

a scythe. The British manner of fighting from chariots is particularly

described by Caesar, who gives them the name of _esseda_:--"The

following is the manner of fighting from _essedae_: They first drive

round with them to all parts of the line, throwing their javelins, and

generally disordering the ranks by the very alarm occasioned by the

horses, and the rattling of the wheels: then, as soon as they have

insinuated themselves between the troops of horse, they leap from their

chariots and fight on foot. The drivers then withdraw a little from the

battle, in order that, if their friends are overpowered by numbers,

they may have a secure retreat to the chariots. Thus they act with

the celerity of horse, and the stability of foot; and by daily use and

exercise they acquire the power of holding up their horses at full speed

down a steep declivity, of stopping them suddenly, and turning in a

short compass; and they accustom themselves to run upon the pole, and

stand on the cross-tree, and from thence with great agility to recover

their place in the chariot."--Bell. Gall. iv. 33.

[120] These targets, called _cetrae_, in the Latin, were made of

leather. The broad sword and target were till very lately the peculiar

arms of the Highlanders.

[121] Several inscriptions have been found in Britain commemorating the

Tungrian cohorts.

[122] The great conciseness of Tacitus has rendered the description of

this battle somewhat obscure. The following, however, seems to have been

the general course of occurrences in it:--The foot on both sides began

the engagement. The first line of the Britons which was formed on the

plain being broken, the Roman auxiliaries advanced up the hill after

them. In the meantime the Roman horse in the wings, unable to withstand

the shock of the chariots, gave way, and were pursued by the British

chariots and horse, which then fell in among the Roman infantry, These,

who at first had relaxed their files to prevent their being out-fronted,

now closed, in order better to resist the enemy, who by this means were

unable to penetrate them. The chariots and horse, therefore, became

entangled amidst the inequalities of the ground, and the thick ranks

of the Romans; and, no longer able to wheel and career as upon the open

plain, gave not the least appearance of an equestrian skirmish: but,

keeping their footing with difficulty on the declivity, were pushed off,

and scattered in disorder over the field.

[123] People of Fifeshire.

[124] Where this was does not appear. Brotier calls it Sandwich, making

it the same as _Rutupium_: others Plymouth or Portsmouth. It is clear,

however, this cannot be the case, from the subsequent words.--_White_.

[125] This circumnavigation was in a contrary direction to that of the

Usipian deserters, the fleet setting out from the Firth of Tay on the

eastern coast, and sailing round the northern, western, and southern

coasts, till it arrived at the port of Sandwich in Kent. After staying

here some time to refit, it went to its former station, in the Firth of

Forth, or Tay.

[126] It was in this same year that Domitian made his pompous expedition

into Germany, from whence he returned without ever seeing the enemy.

[127] Caligula in like manner got a number of tall men with their hair

dyed red to give credit to a pretended victory over the Germans.

[128] Thus Pliny, in his Panegyric on Trajan, xlviii., represents

Domitian as "ever affecting darkness and secrecy, and never emerging

from his solitude but in order to make a solitude."

[129] Not the triumph itself, which, after the year of Rome 740 was no

longer granted to private persons, but reserved for the imperial family.

This new piece of adulation was invented by Agrippa in order to gratify

Augustus. The "triumphal ornaments" which were still bestowed, were a

peculiar garment, statue, and other insignia which had distinguished the

person of the triumphing general.

[130] Of Dover.

[131] Domitian, it seems, was afraid that Agricola might refuse to obey

the recall he forwarded to him, and even maintain his post by force. He

therefore despatched one of his confidential freedmen with an autograph

letter, wherein he was informed Syria was given to him as his province.

This, however, was a mere ruse: and hence it was not to be delivered

as Agricola had already set out on his return. In compliance with these

instructions, the freedman returned at once to Domitian, when he found

Agricola on his passage to Rome According to Dion (liii.), the emperor's

lieutenants were required to leave their province immediately upon

the arrival of their successor, and return to Rome within three

months.--_White_.

[132] Agricola's successor in Britain appears to have been Sallustius

Lucullus, who, as Suetonius informs us, was put to death by Domitian

because he, permitted certain lances of a new construction to be palled

Lucullean.--Life of Domitian, s. 10.

[133] Of this worst kind of enemies, who praise a man in order to render

him obnoxious, the emperor Julian, who had himself suffered greatly by

them, speaks feelingly in his 12th epistle to Basilius;--"For we live

together not in that state of dissimulation, which, I imagine, you have

hitherto experienced: in which those who praise you, hate you with a

more confirmed aversion than your most inveterate enemies."

[134] These calamitous events are recorded by Suetonius in his Life of

Domitian.

[135] The Rhine and Danube.

[136] The two senior consulars cast lots for the government of Asia and

Africa.

[137] Suetonius relates that Civica Cerealis was put to death in his

proconsulate of Asia, on the charge of meditating a revolt. (Life of

Domitian, s. 10.)

[138] Obliging persons to return thanks for an injury was a refinement

in tyranny frequently practised by the worst of the Roman emperors. Thus

Seneca informs us, that "Caligula was thanked by those whose children

had been put to death, and whose property had been confiscated." (De

Tranquil, xiv.) And again;--"The reply of a person who had grown old in

his attendance on kings, when he was asked how he had attained a thing

so uncommon in courts as old age? is well known. It was, said he, by

receiving injuries, and returning thanks."--De Ira, ii. 33.

[139] From a passage in Dio, lxxviii. p. 899, this sum appears to have

been _decies sestertium_, about 9,000_l._ sterling.

[140] Thus Seneca: "Little souls rendered insolent by prosperity have

this worst property, that they hate those whom they have injured."--De

Ira, ii. 33.

[141] Several who suffered under Nero and Domitian erred, though nobly,

in this respect.

[142] A Greek epigram still extant of Antiphilus, a Byzantine, to the

memory of a certain Agricola, is supposed by the learned to refer to the

great man who is the subject of this work. It is in the Anthologia, lib.

i. tit. 37.

[143] Dio absolutely affirms it; but from the manner in which Tacitus,

who had better means of information, speaks of it, the story was

probably false.

[144] It appears that the custom of making the emperor co-heir with the

children of the testator was not by any means uncommon. It was done in

order to secure the remainder to the family. Thus Prasutagus, king of

the Iceni in Britain, made Nero co-heir with his two daughters. Thus

when Lucius Vetus was put to death by Nero, his friends urged him to

leave part of his property to the emperor, that his grandsons might

enjoy the rest. (Ann. xvi. 11.) Suetonius (viii. 17) mentions that

Domitian used to seize the estates of persons the most unknown to him,

if any one could be found to assert that the deceased had expressed an

intention to make the emperor his heir.--_White_.

[145] Caligula. This was A.D. 40, when he was sole consul.

[146] According to this account, the birth of Agricola was on June 13th,

in the year of Rome 793, A.D. 40; and his death on August 23d, in the

year of Rome 846 A.D. 93: for this appears by the Fasti Consulares

to have been the year of the consulate of Collega and Priscus. He

was therefore only in his fifty-fourth year when he died; so that the

copyists must probably have written by mistake LVI. instead of LIV.

[147] From this representation, Dio appears to have been mistaken in

asserting that Agricola passed the latter part of his life in dishonor

and penury.

[148] Juvenal breaks out in a noble strain of indignation against this

savage cruelty, which distinguished the latter part of Domitian's reign:

Atque utinam his potius nugis tota illa dedisset

Tempora saevitiae: claras quibus abstulit Urbi

Illustresque animas impune, et vindice nullo.

Sed periit, postquam cerdonibus esse timendus

Coeperat: hoc nocuit Lamiarum, caede madenti.--Sat. iv. 150.

"What folly this! but oh! that all the rest

Of his dire reign had thus been spent in jest!

And all that time such trifles had employ'd

In which so many nobles he destroy'd!

He safe, they unrevenged, to the disgrace

Of the surviving, tame, patrician race!

But when he dreadful to the rabble grew,

Him, who so many lords had slain, they slew."--DUKE.

[149] This happened in the year of Rome 848.

[150] Carus and Massa, who were proverbially infamous as informers,

are represented by Juvenal as dreading a still more dangerous villain,

Heliodorus.

--Quem Massa timet, quem munere palpat

Carus.--Sat. i. 35.

"Whom Massa dreads, whom Carus soothes with bribes."

Carus is also mentioned with deserved infamy by Pliny and Martial. He

was a mimic by profession.

[151] Of this odious instrument of tyranny, Pliny the younger thus

speaks: "The conversation turned upon Catullus Messalinus, whose loss

of sight added the evils of blindness to a cruel disposition. He was

irreverent, unblushing, unpitying, Like a weapon, of itself blind and

unconscious, he was frequently hurled by Domitian against every man of

worth." (iv. 22.) Juvenal launches the thunder of invective against him

in the following lines:--

Et cum mortifero prudens Vejento Catullo,

Qui numquam visae flagrabat amore puellae,

Grande, et conspicuum nostro quoque tempore monstrum,

Caecus adulator, dirusque a ponte satelles,

Dignus Aricinos qui mendicaret ad axes,

Blandaque devexae jactaret basia rhedae.--Sat. iv. 113.

"Cunning Vejento next, and by his side

Bloody Catullus leaning on his guide:

Decrepit, yet a furious lover he,

And deeply smit with charms he could not see.

A monster, that ev'n this worst age outvies,

Conspicuous and above the common size.

A blind base flatterer; from some bridge or gate,

Raised to a murd'ring minister of state.

Deserving still to beg upon the road,

And bless each passing wagon and its load."--DUKE.

[152] This was a famous villa of Domitian's, near the site of the

ancient Alba, about twelve miles from Rome. The place is now called

Albano, and vast ruins of its magnificent edifices still remain.

[153] Tacitus, in his History, mentions this Massa Baebius as a person

most destructive to all men of worth, and constantly engaged on the

side of villains. From a letter of Pliny's to Tacitus, it appears that

Herennius Senecio and himself were joined as counsel for the province

of Boetica in a prosecution of Massa Baebius; and that Massa after his

condemnation petitioned the consuls for liberty to prosecute Senecio for

treason.

[154] By "our own hands," Tacitus means one of our own body, a senator.

As Publicius Certus had seized upon Helvidius and led him to prison,

Tacitus imputes the crime to the whole senatorian order. To the same

purpose Pliny observes: "Amidst the numerous villanies of numerous

persons, nothing appeared more atrocious than that in the senate-house

one senator should lay hands on another, a praetorian on a consular man,

a judge on a criminal."--B. ix. ep. 13.

[155] Helvidius Priscus, a friend of Pliny the younger, who did not

suffer his death to remain unrevenged. See the Epistle above referred

to.

[156] There is in this place some defect in the manuscripts, which

critics have endeavored to supply in different manners. Brotier seems to

prefer, though he does not adopt in the text, "nos Mauricum Rusticumque

divisimus," "we parted Mauricus and Rusticus," by the death of one

and the banishment of the other. The prosecution and crime of Rusticus

(Arulenus) is mentioned at the beginning of this piece, c. 2. Mauricus

was his brother.

[157] Herennius Senecio. See c. 2.

[158] Thus Pliny, in his Panegyr. on Trajan, xlviii.: "Domitian was

terrible even to behold; pride in his brow, anger in his eyes, a

feminine paleness in the rest of his body, in his face shamelessness

suffused in a glowing red." Seneca, in Epist. xi. remarks, that "some

are never more to be dreaded than when they blush; as if they had

effused all their modesty. Sylla was always most furious when the blood

had mounted into his cheeks."

The Germany and the Agricola of Tacitus · 第 9 / 10 题