For the Indian arc in long. 77 deg. 40' we have the following data:--

deg. ' " Ft.

Punnea 8 9 31.132 ..

Putchapolliam 10 59 42.276 1029174.9

Dodagunta 12 59 52.165 1756562.0

Namthabad 15 5 53.562 2518376.3

Daumergida 18 3 15.292 3591788.4

Takalkhera 21 5 51.532 4697329.5

Kalianpur 24 7 11.262 5794695.7

Kaliana 29 30 48.322 7755835.9

The data of the Russian arc (long. 26 deg. 40') taken from Struve's work are

as below:--

deg. ' " Ft.

Staro Nekrasovsk 45 20 2.94 ..

Vodu-Luy 47 1 24.98 616529.81

Suprunkovzy 48 45 3.04 1246762.17

Kremenets 50 5 49.95 1737551.48

Byelin 52 2 42.16 2448745.17

Nemesh 54 39 4.16 3400312.63

Jacobstadt 56 30 4.97 4076412.28

Dorpat 58 22 47.56 4762421.43

Hogland 60 5 9.84 5386135.39

Kilpi-maki 62 38 5.25 6317905.67

Tornea 65 49 44.57 7486789.97

Stuor-oivi 68 40 58.40 8530517.90

Fuglenaes 70 40 11.23 9257921.06

From the are measured in Cape Colony by Sir Thomas Maclear in long. 18 deg.

30', we have

deg. ' " Ft.

North End 29 44 17.66 ..

Heerenlogement Berg 31 58 9.11 811507.7

Royal Observatory 33 56 3.20 1526386.8

Zwart Kop 34 13 32.13 1632583.3

Cape Point 34 21 6.26 1678375.7

And, finally, for the Peruvian arc, in long. 281 deg. 0',

deg. ' " Ft.

Tarqui 3 4 32.068 ..

Cotchesqui 0 2 31.387 1131036.3

Having now stated the data of the problem, we may seek that oblate

ellipsoid (spheroid) which best represents the observations. Whatever

the real figure may be, it is certain that if we suppose it an ellipsoid

with three unequal axes, the arithmetical process will bring out an

ellipsoid, which will agree better with all the observed latitudes than

any spheroid would, therefore we do not _prove_ that it is an ellipsoid;

to prove this, arcs of longitude would be required. The result for the

spheroid may be expressed thus:--

a = 20926062 ft. = 6378206.4 metres.

b = 20855121 ft. = 6356583.8 metres.

b : a = 293.98 : 294.98.

As might be expected, the sum of the squares of the 40 latitude

corrections, viz. 153.99, is greater in this figure than in that of

three axes, where it amounts to 138.30. For this case, in the Indian arc

the largest corrections are at Dodagunta, + 3.87", and at Kalianpur, -

3.68". In the Russian arc the largest corrections are + 3.76", at

Tornea, and - 3.31", at Staro Nekrasovsk. Of the whole 40 corrections,

16 are under 1.0", 10 between 1.0" and 2.0", 10 between 2.0" and

3.0", and 4 over 3.0". The probable error of an observed latitude is +-

1.42"; for the spheroidal it would be very slightly larger. This

quantity may be taken therefore as approximately the probable amount of

local deflection.

If [rho] be the radius of curvature of the meridian in latitude [phi],

[rho]' that perpendicular to the meridian, D the length of a degree of

the meridian, D' the length of a degree of longitude, r the radius drawn

from the centre of the earth, V the angle of the vertical with the

radius-vector, then

Ft.

[rho] = 20890606.6 - 106411.5 cos 2[phi] + 225.8 cos 4[phi]

[rho]' = 20961607.3 - 35590.9 cos 2[phi] + 45.2 cos 4[phi]

D = 364609.87 - 1857.14 cos 2[phi] + 3.94 cos 4[phi]

D' = 365538.48 cos [phi] - 310.17 cos 3[phi] + 0.39 cos 5[phi]

Log r/a = 9.9992645 + .0007374 cos 2[phi] - .0000019 cos 4[phi]

V = 700.44" sin 2[phi] - 1.19" sin 4[phi].

A.R. Clarke has recalculated the elements of the ellipsoid of the earth;

his values, derived in 1880, in which he utilized the measurements of

parallel arcs in India, are particularly in practice. These values

are:--

a = 20926202 ft. = 6378249 metres,

b = 20854895 ft. = 6356515 metres,

b : a = 292.465 : 293.465.

The calculation of the elements of the ellipsoid of rotation from

measurements of the curvature of arcs in any given azimuth by means of

geographical longitudes, latitudes and azimuths is indicated in the

article GEODESY; reference may be made to _Principal Triangulation_,

Helmert's _Geodasie_, and the publications of the Kgl. Preuss. Geod.

Inst.:--_Lotabweichungen_ (1886), and _Die europ. Laengengradmessung in

52 deg. Br._ (1893). For the calculation of an ellipsoid with three

unequal axes see _Comparison of Standards_, preface; and for

non-elliptical meridians, _Principal Triangulation_, p. 733.

_Gravitation-Measurements._

According to Clairault's theorem (see above) the ellipticity e of the

mathematical surface of the earth is equal to the difference (5/2)m -ss,

where m is the ratio of the centrifugal force at the equator to gravity

at the equator, and ss is derived from the formula G = g(1 + ss

sin squared[phi]). Since the beginning of the 19th century many efforts have

been made to determine the constants of this formula, and numerous

expeditions undertaken to investigate the intensity of gravity in

different latitudes. If m be known, it is only necessary to determine ss

for the evaluation of e; consequently it is unnecessary to determine G

absolutely, for the relative values of G at two known latitudes suffice.

Such relative measurements are easier and more exact than absolute ones.

In some cases the ordinary thread pendulum, i.e. a spherical bob

suspended by a wire, has been employed; but more often a rigid metal

rod, bearing a weight and a knife-edge on which it may oscillate, has

been adopted. The main point is the constancy of the pendulum. From the

formula for the time of oscillation of the mathematically ideal

pendulum, t = 2 [pi] [root](l/G), l being the length, it follows that

for two points G1/G2 = t2 squared/t1 squared.

In 1808 J.B. Biot commenced his pendulum observations at several

stations in western Europe; and in 1817-1825 Captain Louis de Freycinet

and L.I. Duperrey prosecuted similar observations far into the southern

hemisphere. Captain Henry Kater confined himself to British stations

(1818-1819); Captain E. Sabine, from 1819 to 1829, observed similarly,

with Kater's pendulum, at seventeen stations ranging from the West

Indies to Greenland and Spitsbergen; and in 1824-1831, Captain Henry

Foster (who met his death by drowning in Central America) experimented

at sixteen stations; his observations were completed by Francis Baily in

London. Of other workers in this field mention may be made of F.B. Luetke

(1826-1829), a Russian rear-admiral, and Captains J.B. Basevi and W.T.

Heaviside, who observed during 1865 to 1873 at Kew and at 29 Indian

stations, particularly at More in the Himalayas at a height of 4696

metres. Of the earlier absolute determinations we may mention those of

Biot, Kater, and Bessel at Paris, London and Koenigsberg respectively.

The measurements were particularly difficult by reason of the length of

the pendulums employed, these generally being second-pendulums over 1

metre long. In about 1880, Colonel Robert von Sterneck of Austria

introduced the half-second pendulum, which permitted far quicker and

more accurate work. The use of these pendulums spread in all countries,

and the number of gravity stations consequently increased: in 1880 there

were about 120, in 1900 there were about 1600, of which the greater

number were in Europe. Sir E. Sabine[6] calculated the ellipticity to be

1/288.5, a value shown to be too high by Helmert, who in 1884, with the

aid of 120 stations, gave the value 1/299.26,[7] and in 1901, with about

1400 stations, derived the value 1/298.3.[8] The reason for the

excessive estimate of Sabine is that he did not take into account the

systematic difference between the values of G for continents and

islands; it was found that in consequence of the constitution of the

earth's crust (Pratt) G is greater on small islands of the ocean than

on continents by an amount which may approach to 0.3 cm. Moreover,

stations in the neighbourhood of coasts shelving to deep seas have a

surplus, but a little smaller. Consequently, Helmert conducted his

calculations of 1901 for continents and coasts separately, and obtained

G for the coasts 0.036 cm. greater than for the continents, while the

value of ss remained the same. The mean value, reduced to continents, is

G = 978.03(1 + 0.005302 sin squared[phi] - 0.000007 sin squared 2[phi])cm/sec squared.

The small term involving sin squared 2[phi] could not be calculated with

sufficient exactness from the observations, and is therefore taken from

the theoretical views of Sir G.H. Darwin and E. Wiechert. For the

constant g = 978.03 cm. another correction has been suggested (1906) by

the absolute determinations made by F. Kuehnen and Ph. Furtwaengler at

Potsdam.[9]

A report on the pendulum measurements of the 19th century has been

given by Helmert in the _Comptes rendus des seances de la 13^e

conference generale de l'Association Geod. Internationale a Paris_

(1900), ii. 139-385.

A difficulty presents itself in the case of the application of

measurements of gravity to the determination of the figure of the earth

by reason of the extrusion or standing out of the land-masses

(continents, &c.) above the sea-level. The potential of gravity has a

different mathematical expression outside the masses than inside. The

difficulty is removed by assuming (with Sir G.G. Stokes) the vertical

condensation of the masses on the sea-level, without its form being

considerably altered (scarcely 1 metre radially). Further, the value of

gravity (g) measured at the height H is corrected to sea-level by +

2gH/R, where R is the radius of the earth. Another correction, due to P.

Bouguer, is -(3/2)g[delta]H/[rho]R, where [delta] is the density of the

strata of height H, and [rho] the mean density of the earth. These two

corrections are represented in "Bouguer's Rule": g_H = g_s(1 - 2H/R +

3[delta]H/2[rho]R), where g_H is the gravity at height H, and g_s the

value at sea-level. This is supposed to take into account the attraction

of the elevated strata or plateau; but, from the analytical method, this

is not correct; it is also disadvantageous since, in general, the

land-masses are compensated subterraneously, by reason of the isostasis

of the earth's crust.

In 1849 Stokes showed that the normal elevations N of the geoid towards

the ellipsoid are calculable from the deviations [Delta]g of the

acceleration of gravity, i.e. the differences between the observed g and

the value calculated from the normal G formula. The method assumes that

gravity is measured on the earth's surface at a sufficient number of

points, and that it is conformably reduced. In order to secure the

convergence of the expansions in spherical harmonics, it is necessary to

assume all masses outside a surface parallel to the surface of the sea

at a depth of 21 km. (= R x ellipticity) to be condensed on this surface

(Helmert, _Geod._ ii. 172). In addition to the reduction with 2gH/R,

there still result small reductions with mountain chains and coasts, and

somewhat larger ones for islands. The sea-surface generally varies but

very little by this condensation. The elevation (N) of the geoid is then

equal to

_

/[pi]

N = R | FG^(-1) [Delta]g_[psi] d[psi],

_/

where [psi] is the spherical distance from the point N, and

[Delta]g_[psi] denotes the mean value of [Delta]g for all points in the

same distance [psi] around; F is a function of [psi], and has the

following values:--

+-------+-------+

| [Psi]=| F= |

+-------+-------+

| 0 deg. | 1 |

| 10 deg. | 1.22 |

| 20 deg. | 0.94 |

| 30 deg. | 0.47 |

| 40 deg. | -0.06 |

| 50 deg. | -0.54 |

| 60 deg. | -0.90 |

| 70 deg. | -1.08 |

| 80 deg. | -1.08 |

| 90 deg. | -0.91 |

| 100 deg. | -0.62 |

| 110 deg. | -0.27 |

| 120 deg. | +0.08 |

| 130 deg. | 0.36 |

| 140 deg. | 0.53 |

| 150 deg. | 0.56 |

| 160 deg. | 0.46 |

| 170 deg. | 0.26 |

| 180 deg. | 0 |

+-------+-------+

H. Poincare (_Bull. Astr._, 1901, p. 5) has exhibited N by means of

Lame's functions; in this case the condensation is effected on an

ellipsoidal surface, which approximates to the geoid. This condensation

is, in practice, the same as to the geoid itself.

If we imagine the outer land-masses to be condensed on the sea-level,

and the inner masses (which, together with the outer masses, causes the

deviation of the geoid from the ellipsoid) to be compensated in the

sea-level by a disturbing stratum (which, according to Gauss, is

possible), and if these masses of both kinds correspond at the point N

to a stratum of thickness D and density [delta], then, according to

Helmert (_Geod._ ii. 260) we have approximately

3 g /[delta]D \

[Delta]g = -- -- ( -------- - N ).

2 R \ [rho] /

Since N slowly varies empirically, it follows that in restricted regions

(of a few 100 km. in diameter) [Delta]g is a measure of the variation of

D. By applying the reduction of Bouguer to g, D is diminished by H and

only gives the thickness of the ideal disturbing mass which corresponds

to the perturbations due to subterranean masses. [Delta]g has positive

values on coasts, small islands, and high and medium mountain chains,

and occasionally in plains; while in valleys and at the foot of mountain

ranges it is negative (up to 0.2 cm.). We conclude from this that the

masses of smaller density existing under high mountain chains lie not

only vertically underneath but also spread out sideways.

_The European Arc of Parallel in 52 deg. Lat._

Many measurements of degrees of longitudes along central parallels in

Europe were projected and partly carried out as early as the first half

of the 19th century; these, however, only became of importance after the

introduction of the electric telegraph, through which calculations of

astronomical longitudes obtained a much higher degree of accuracy. Of

the greatest moment is the measurement near the parallel of 52 deg. lat.,

which extended from Valentia in Ireland to Orsk in the southern Ural

mountains over 69 deg. long, (about 6750 km.). F.G.W. Struve, who is to be

regarded as the father of the Russo-Scandinavian latitude-degree

measurements, was the originator of this investigation. Having made the

requisite arrangements with the governments in 1857, he transferred

them to his son Otto, who, in 1860, secured the co-operation of England.

A new connexion of England with the continent, via the English Channel,

was accomplished in the next two years; whereas the requisite

triangulations in Prussia and Russia extended over several decennaries.

The number of longitude stations originally arranged for was 15; and the

determinations of the differences in longitude were uniformly commenced

by the Russian observers E.I. von Forsch, J.I. Zylinski, B. Tiele and

others; Feaghmain (Valentia) being reserved for English observers. With

the concluding calculation of these operations, newer determinations of

differences of longitudes were also applicable, by which the number of

stations was brought up to 29. Since local deflections of the plumb-line

were suspected at Feaghmain, the most westerly station, the longitude

(with respect to Greenwich) of the trigonometrical station Killorglin at

the head of Dingle Bay was shortly afterwards determined.

The results (1891-1894) are given in volumes xlvii. and l. of the

memoirs (Zapiski) of the military topographical division of the

Russian general staff, volume li. contains a reconnexion of Orsk. The

observations made west of Warsaw are detailed in the _Die europ.

Laengengradmessung in 52 deg. Br._, i. and ii., 1893, 1896, published by

the Kgl. Preuss. Geod. Inst.

The following figures are quoted from Helmert's report "Die Groesse der

Erde" (_Sitzb. d. Berl. Akad. d. Wiss._, 1906, p. 535):--

_Easterly Deviation of the Astronomical Zenith_.

Name. Longitude.

deg. ' "

Feaghmain -10 21 -3.3

Killorglin - 9 47 +2.8

Haverfordwest - 4 58 +1.6

Greenwich 0 0 +1.5

Rosendael-Nieuport + 2 35 -1.7

Bonn + 7 6 -4.4

Goettingen + 9 57 -2.4

Brocken +10 37 +2.3

Leipzig +12 23 +2.7

Rauenberg-Berlin +13 23 +1.7

Grossenhain +13 33 -2.9

Schneekoppe +15 45 +0.1

Springberg +16 37 +0.8

Breslau-Rosenthal +17 2 +3.5

Trockenberg +18 53 -0.5

Schoensee +18 54 -2.9

Mirov +19 18 +2.2

Warsaw +21 2 +1.9

Grodno +23 50 -2.8

Bobruisk +29 14 +0.5

Orel +36 4 +4.4

Lipetsk +39 36 +0.2

Saratov +46 3 +6.4

Samara +50 5 -2.6

Orenburg +55 7 +1.7

Orsk +58 34 -8.0

These deviations of the plumb-line correspond to an ellipsoid having an

equatorial radius (a) of nearly 6,378,000 metres (prob. error +- 70

metres) and an ellipticity 1/299.15. The latter was taken for granted;

it is nearly equal to the result from the gravity-measurements; the

value for a then gives [Sigma][eta] squared a minimum (nearly). The

astronomical values of the geographical longitudes (with regard to

Greenwich) are assumed, according to the compensation of longitude

differences carried out by van de Sande Bakhuyzen (_Comp. rend, des

seances de la commission permanente de l'Association Geod.

Internationale a Geneve, 1893, annexe A.I._). Recent determinations

(Albrecht, _Astr. Nach._, 3993/4) have introduced only small alterations

in the deviations, a being slightly increased.

Of considerable importance in the investigation of the great arc was

the representation of the linear lengths found in different countries,

in terms of the same unit. The necessity for this had previously

occurred in the computation of the figure of the earth from

latitude-degree-measurements. A.R. Clarke instituted an extensive

series of comparisons at Southampton (see _Comparisons of Standards of

Length of England, France, Belgium, Prussia, Russia, India and

Australia, made at the Ordnance Survey Office, Southampton, 1866_, and

a paper in the _Philosophical Transactions_ for 1873, by Lieut.-Col.

A.R. Clarke, C.B., R.E., on the further comparisons of the standards

of Austria, Spain, the United States, Cape of Good Hope and Russia) and

found that 1 toise = 6.39453348 ft., 1 metre = 3.28086933 ft.

In 1875 a number of European states concluded the metre convention, and

in 1877 an international weights-and-measures bureau was established at

Breteuil. Until this time the metre was determined by the end-surfaces

of a platinum rod (_metre des archives_); subsequently, rods of

platinum-iridium, of cross-section H, were constructed, having engraved

lines at both ends of the bridge, which determine the distance of a

metre. There were thirty of the rods which gave as accurately as

possible the length of the metre; and these were distributed among the

different states (see WEIGHTS AND MEASURES). Careful comparisons with

several standard toises showed that the metre was not exactly equal to

443,296 lines of the toise, but, in round numbers, 1/75000 of the length

smaller. The metre according to the older relation is called the "legal

metre," according to the new relation the "international metre." The

values are (see _Europ. Laengengradmessung_, i. p. 230):--

Legal metre = 3.28086933 ft., International metre = 3.2808257 ft.

The values of a given above are in terms of the international metre; the

earlier ones in legal metres, while the gravity formulae are in

international metres.

_The International Geodetic Association (Internationale Erdmessung)._

On the proposition of the Prussian lieutenant-general, Johann Jacob

Baeyer, a conference of delegates of several European states met at

Berlin in 1862 to discuss the question of a "Central European

degree-measurement." The first general conference took place at Berlin

two years later; shortly afterwards other countries joined the movement,

which was then named "The European degree-measurement." From 1866 till

1886 Prussia had borne the expense incident to the central bureau at

Berlin; but when in 1886 the operations received further extension and

the title was altered to "The International Earth-measurement" or

"International Geodetic Association," the co-operating states made

financial contributions to this purpose. The central bureau is

affiliated with the Prussian Geodetic Institute, which, since 1892, has

been situated on the Telegraphenberg near Potsdam. After Baeyer's death

Prof. Friedrich Robert Helmert was appointed director. The funds are

devoted to the advancement of such scientific works as concern all

countries and deal with geodetic problems of a general or universal

nature. During the period 1897-1906 the following twenty-one countries

belonged to the association:--Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England,

France, Germany, Greece, Holland, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway,

Portugal, Rumania, Russia, Servia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the

United States of America. At the present time general conferences take

place every three years.[10]

Baeyer projected the investigation of the curvature of the meridians and

the parallels of the mathematical surface of the earth stretching from

Christiania to Palermo for 12 degrees of longitude; he sought to

co-ordinate and complete the network of triangles in the countries

through which these meridians passed, and to represent his results by a

common unit of length. This proposition has been carried out, and

extended over the greater part of Europe; as a matter of fact, the

network has, with trifling gaps, been carried over the whole of western

and central Europe, and, by some chains of triangles, over European

Russia. Through the co-operation of France, the network has been

extended into north Africa as far as the geographical latitude of 32 deg.;

in Greece a network, united with those of Italy and Bosnia, has been

carried out by the Austrian colonel, Heinrich Hartl; Servia has

projected similar triangulations; Rumania has begun to make the triangle

measurements, and three base lines have been measured by French

officers with Brunner's apparatus. At present, in Rumania, there is

being worked a connexion between the arc of parallel in lat. 47 deg./48 deg. in

Russia (stretching from Astrakan to Kishinev) with Austria-Hungary. In

the latter country and in south Bavaria the connecting triangles for

this parallel have been recently revised, as well as the French chain on

the Paris parallel, which has been connected with the German net by the

co-operation of German and French geodesists. This will give a long arc

of parallel, really projected in the first half of the 19th century. The

calculation of the Russian section gives, with an assumed ellipticity of

1/299.15, the value a = 6377350 metres; this is rather uncertain, since

the arc embraces only 19 deg. in longitude.

We may here recall that in France geodetic studies have recovered their

former expansion under the vigorous impulse of Colonel (afterwards

General) Francois Perrier. When occupied with the triangulation of

Algeria, Colonel Perrier had conceived the possibility of the geodetic

junction of Algeria to Spain, over the Mediterranean; therefore the

French meridian line, which was already connected with England, and was

thus produced to the 60th parallel, could further be linked to the

Spanish triangulation, cross thence into Algeria and extend to the

Sahara, so as to form an arc of about 30 deg. in length. But it then became

urgent to proceed to a new measurement of the French arc, between

Dunkirk and Perpignan. In 1869 Perrier was authorized to undertake that

revision. He devoted himself to that work till the end of his career,

closed by premature death in February 1888, at the very moment when the

_Depot de la guerre_ had just been transformed into the Geographical

Service of the Army, of which General F. Perrier was the first director.

His work was continued by his assistant, Colonel (afterwards General)

J.A.L. Bassot. The operations concerning the revision of the French arc

were completed only in 1896. Meanwhile the French geodesists had

accomplished the junction of Algeria to Spain, with the help of the

geodesists of the Madrid Institute under General Carlos Ibanez (1879),

and measured the meridian line between Algiers and El Aghuat (1881).

They have since been busy in prolonging the meridians of El Aghuat and

Biskra, so as to converge towards Wargla, through Ghardaia and Tuggurt.

The fundamental co-ordinates of the Pantheon have also been obtained

anew, by connecting the Pantheon and the Paris Observatory with the five

stations of Bry-sur-Marne, Morlu, Mont Valerien, Chatillon and

Montsouris, where the observations of latitude and azimuth have been

effected.[11]

According to the calculations made at the central bureau of the

international association on the great meridian arc extending from the

Shetland Islands, through Great Britain, France and Spain to El Aghuat in

Algeria, a = 6377935 metres, the ellipticity being assumed as 1/299.15.

The following table gives the difference: astronomical-geodetic latitude.

The net does not follow the meridian exactly, but deviates both to the

west and to the east; actually, the meridian of Greenwich is nearer the

mean than that of Paris (Helmert, _Groesse d. Erde_).

_West Europe-Africa Meridian-arc._[12]

Name. Latitude. A.-G.

deg. ' "

Saxavord 60 49.6 -4.0

Balta 60 45.0 -6.1

Ben Hutig 58 33.1 +0.3

Cowhythe 57 41.1 +7.3

Great Stirling 57 27.8 -2.3

Kellie Law 56 14.9 -3.7

Calton Hill 55 57.4 +3.5

Durham 54 46.1 -0.9

Burleigh Moor 54 34.3 +2.1

Clifton Beacon 53 27.5 +1.3

Arbury Hill 52 13.4 -3.0

Greenwich 51 28.6 -2.5

Nieuport 51 7.8 -0.4

Rosendael 51 2.7 -0.9

Lihons 49 49.9 +0.5

Pantheon 48 50.8 -0.0

Chevry 48 0.5 +2.2

Saligny le Vif 47 2.7 +3.0

Arpheuille 46 13.7 +6.3

Puy de Dome 45 46.5 +7.0

Rodez 44 21.4 +1.7

Carcassonne 43 13.3 +0.7

Rivesaltes 42 45.2 -0.7

Montolar 41 38.5 +3.6

Lerida 41 37.0 -0.2

Javalon 40 13.8 -0.2

Desierto 40 5.0 -4.5

Chinchilla 38 55.2 +2.2

Mola de Formentera 38 39.9 -1.2

Tetica 37 15.2 +3.5

Roldan 36 56.6 -6.0

Conjuros 36 44.4 -12.6

Mt. Sabiha 35 39.6 +6.5

Nemours 35 5.8 +7.4

Bouzareah 36 48.0 +2.9

Algiers (Voirol) 36 45.1 -9.1

Guelt es Stel 35 7.8 -1.0

El Aghuat 33 48.0 -2.8

[Illustration]

While the radius of curvature of this arc is obviously not uniform

(being, in the mean, about 600 metres greater in the northern than in

the southern part), the Russo-Scandinavian meridian arc (from 45 deg. to

70 deg.), on the other hand, is very uniformly curved, and gives, with an

ellipticity of 1/299.15, a = 6378455 metres; this arc gives the

plausible value 1/298.6 for the ellipticity. But in the case of this arc

the orographical circumstances are more favourable.

The west-European and the Russo-Scandinavian meridians indicate another

anomaly of the geoid. They were connected at the Central Bureau by means

of east-to-west triangle chains (principally by the arc of parallel

measurements in lat. 52 deg.); it was shown that, if one proceeds from the

west-European meridian arcs, the differences between the astronomical

and geodetic latitudes of the Russo-Scandinavian arc become some 4"

greater.[13]

The central European meridian, which passes through Germany and the

countries adjacent on the north and south, is under review at Potsdam

(see the publications of the Kgl. Preuss. Geod. Inst., _Lotabweichungen_,

Nos. 1-3). Particular notice must be made of the Vienna meridian, now

carried southwards to Malta. The Italian triangulation is now complete,

and has been joined with the neighbouring countries on the north, and

with Tunis on the south.

The United States Coast and Geodetic Survey has published an account of

the transcontinental triangulation and measurement of an arc of the

parallel of 39 deg., which extends from Cape May (New Jersey), on the

Atlantic coast, to Point Arena (California), on the Pacific coast, and

embraces 48 deg. 46' of longitude, with a linear development of about 4225

km. (2625 miles). The triangulation depends upon ten base-lines, with an

aggregate length of 86 km. the longest exceeding 17 km. in length, which

have been measured with the utmost care. In crossing the Rocky

Mountains, many of its sides exceed 100 miles in length, and there is

one side reaching to a length of 294 km., or 183 miles; the altitude of

many of the stations is also considerable, reaching to 4300 metres, or

14,108 ft., in the case of Pike's Peak, and to 14,421 ft. at Elbert

Peak, Colo. All geometrical conditions subsisting in the triangulation

are satisfied by adjustment, inclusive of the required accord of the

base-lines, so that the same length for any given line is found, no

matter from what line one may start.[14]

Over or near the arc were distributed 109 latitude stations, occupied

with zenith telescopes; 73 azimuth stations; and 29 telegraphically

determined longitudes. It has thus been possible to study in a very

complete manner the deviations of the vertical, which in the mountainous

regions sometimes amount to 25 seconds, and even to 29 seconds.

With the ellipticity 1/299.15, a = 6377897 +- 65 metres (prob. error); in

this calculation, however, some exceedingly perturbed stations are

excluded; for the employed stations the mean perturbation in longitude

is +- 4.9" (zenith-deflection east-to-west +- 3.8").

The computations relative to another arc, the "eastern oblique arc of

the United States," are also finished.[15] It extends from Calais

(Maine) in the north-east, to the Gulf of Mexico, and terminates at New

Orleans (Louisiana), in the south. Its length is 2612 km. (1623 miles),

the difference of latitude 15 deg. 1', and of longitude 22 deg. 47'. In the

main, the triangulation follows the Appalachian chain of mountains,

bifurcating once, so as to leave an oval space between the two branches.

It includes among its stations Mount Washington (1920 metres) and Mount

Mitchell (2038 metres). It depends upon six base-lines, and the

adjustment is effected in the same manner as for the arc of the

parallel. The astronomical data have been afforded by 71 latitude

stations, 17 longitude stations, and 56 azimuth stations, distributed

over the whole extent of the arc. The resulting dimensions of an

osculating spheroid were found to be

a = 6378157 metres +- 90 (prob. error),

e(ellipticity) = 1/304.5 +- 1.9 (prob. error).

With the ellipticity 1/399.15, a = 6378041 metres +- 80 (prob. er.).

During the years 1903-1906 the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey,

under the direction of O.H. Tittmann and the special management of John

F. Hayford, executed a calculation of the best ellipsoid of rotation for

the United States. There were 507 astronomical determinations employed,

all the stations being connected through the net-work of triangles. The

observed latitudes, longitude and azimuths were improved by the

attractions of the earth's crust on the hypothesis of isostasis for

three depths of the surface of 114, 121 and 162 km., where the isostasis

is complete. The land-masses, within the distance of 4126 km., were

taken into consideration. In the derivation of an ellipsoid of rotation,

the first case proved itself the most favourable, and there resulted:--

a = 6378283 metres +- 74 (prob. er.), ellipticity

= 1/297.8 +- 0.9 (prob. er.).

The most favourable value for the depth of the isostatic surface is

approximately 114 km.

The measurement of a great meridian arc, in long. 98 deg. W., has been

commenced; it has a range of latitude of 23 deg., and will extend over 50 deg.

when produced southwards and northwards by Mexico and Canada. It may

afterwards be connected with the arc of Quito. A new measurement of the

meridian arc of Quito was executed in the years 1901-1906 by the

_Service geographique_ of France under the direction of the Academie des

Sciences, the ground having been previously reconnoitred in 1899. The

new arc has an amplitude in latitude of 5 deg. 53' 33", and stretches from

Tulcan (lat. 0 deg. 48' 25") on the borders of Columbia and Ecuador, through

Columbia to Payta (lat. -5 deg. 5' 8") in Peru. The end-points, at which the

chain of triangles has a slight north-easterly trend, show a longitude

difference of 3 deg.. Of the 74 triangle points, 64 were latitude stations;

6 azimuths and 8 longitude-differences were measured, three base-lines

were laid down, and gravity was determined from six points, in order to

maintain indications over the general deformation of the geoid in that

region. Computations of the attraction of the mountains on the

plumb-line are also being considered. The work has been much delayed by

the hardships and difficulties encountered. It was conducted by

Lieut.-Colonel Robert Bourgeois, assisted by eleven officers and

twenty-four soldiers of the geodetic branch of the _Service

geographique_. Of these officers mention may be made of Commandant E.

Maurain, who retired in 1904 after suffering great hardships; Commandant

L. Massenet, who died in 1905; and Captains I. Lacombe, A. Lallemand,

and Lieut. Georges Perrier (son of General Perrier). It is conceivable

that the chain of triangles in longitude 98 deg. in North America may be

united with that of Ecuador and Peru: a continuous chain over the whole

of America is certainly but a question of time. During the years

1899-1902 the measurement of an arc of meridian was made in the extreme

north, in Spitzbergen, between the latitudes 76 deg. 38' and 80 deg. 50',

according to the project of P.G. Rosen. The southern part was determined

by the Russians--O. Baecklund, Captain D.D. Sergieffsky, F.N.

Tschernychev, A. Hansky and others--during 1899-1901, with the aid of 1

base-line, 15 trigonometrical, 11 latitude and 5 gravity stations. The

northern part, which has one side in common with the southern part, has

been determined by Swedes (Professors Rosen, father and son, E. Jaederin,

T. Rubin and others), who utilized 1 base-line, 9 azimuth measurements,

18 trigonometrical, 17 latitude and 5 gravity stations. The party worked

under excessive difficulties, which were accentuated by the arctic

climate. Consequently, in the first year, little headway was made.[16]

Sir David Gill, when director of the Royal Observatory, Cape Town,

instituted the magnificent project of working a latitude-degree

measurement along the meridian of 30 deg. long. This meridian passes through

Natal, the Transvaal, by Lake Tanganyika, and from thence to Cairo;

connexion with the Russo-Scandinavian meridian arc of the same longitude

should be made through Asia Minor, Turkey, Bulgaria and Rumania. With

the completion of this project a continuous arc of 105 deg. in latitude will

have been measured.[17]

Extensive triangle chains, suitable for latitude-degree measurements,

have also been effected in Japan and Australia.

Besides, the systematization of gravity measurements is of importance,

and for this purpose the association has instituted many reforms. It has

ensured that the relative measurements made at the stations in different

countries should be reduced conformably with the absolute determinations

made at Potsdam; the result was that, in 1906, the intensities of

gravitation at some 2000 stations had been co-ordinated. The intensity

of gravity on the sea has been determined by the comparison of

barometric and hypsometric observations (Mohn's method). The

association, at the proposal of Helmert, provided the necessary funds

for two expeditions:--English Channel--Rio de Janeiro, and the Red

Sea--Australia--San Francisco--Japan. Dr O. Hecker of the central bureau

was in charge; he successfully overcame the difficulties of the work,

and established the tenability of the isostatic hypothesis, which

necessitates that the intensity of gravity on the deep seas has, in

general, the same value as on the continents (without regard to the

proximity of coasts).[18]

As the result of the more recent determinations, the ellipticity,

compression or flattening of the ellipsoid of the earth may be assumed

to be very nearly 1/298.3; a value determined in 1901 by Helmert from

the measurements of gravity. The semi-major axis, a, of the meridian

ellipse may exceed 6,378,000 inter. metres by about 200 metres. The

central bureau have adopted, for practical reasons, the value 1/299.15,

after Bessel, for which tables exist; and also the value a =

6377397.155(1 + 0.0001).

The methods of theoretical astronomy also permit the evaluation of these

constants. The semi-axis a is calculable from the parallax of the moon

and the acceleration of gravity on the earth; but the results are

somewhat uncertain: the ellipticity deduced from lunar perturbations is

1/297.8 +- 2 (Helmert, _Geodaesie_, ii. pp. 460-473); William Harkness

(_The Solar Parallax and its related Constants_, 1891) from all possible

data derived the values: ellipticity = 1/300.2 +- 3, a = 6377972 +- 125

metres. Harkness also considered in this investigation the relation of

the ellipticity to precession and nutation; newer investigations of the

latter lead to the limiting values 1/296, 1/298 (Wiechert). It was

clearly noticed in this method of determination that the influence of

the assumption as to the density of the strata in the interior of the

earth was but very slight (Radau, _Bull. astr._ ii. (1885) 157). The

deviations of the geoid from the flattened ellipsoid of rotation with

regard to the heights (the directions of normals being nearly the same)

will scarcely exceed +- 100 metres (Helmert).[19]

The basis of the degree- and gravity-measurements is actually formed by

a stationary sea-surface, which is assumed to be level. However, by the

influence of winds and ocean currents the mean surface of the sea near

the coasts (which one assumes as the fundamental sea-surface) can

deviate somewhat from a level surface. According to the more recent

levelling it varies at the most by only some decimeters.[20]

It is well known that the masses of the earth are continually undergoing

small changes; the earth's crust and sea-surface reciprocally oscillate,

and the axis of rotation vibrates relatively to the body of the earth.

The investigation of these problems falls in the programme of the

Association. By continued observations of the water-level on sea-coasts,

results have already been obtained as to the relative motions of the

land and sea (cf. GEOLOGY); more exact levelling will, in the course of

time, provide observations on countries remote from the sea-coast. Since

1900 an international service has been organized between some

astronomical stations distributed over the north parallel of 39 deg. 8', at

which geographical latitudes are observed whenever possible. The

association contributes to all these stations, supporting four entirely:

two in America, one in Italy, and one in Japan; the others partially

(Tschardjui in Russia, and Cincinnati observatory). Some observatories,

especially Pulkowa, Leiden and Tokyo, take part voluntarily. Since 1906

another station for South America and one for Australia in latitude -31 deg.

55' have been added. According to the existing data, geographical

latitudes exhibit variations amounting to +-0.25", which, for the greater

part, proceed from a twelve- and a fourteen-month period.[21]

(A. R. C; F. R. H.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Dyer, Sir Edward" to "Echidna" Volume 8, Slice 9 · 第 72 / 84 题